Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SMT RAMA DEVI SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition was not pressed with liberty to challenge the order and was therefore dismissed.

Summary

The petitioner, Smt Rama Devi Shukla, filed a writ petition under Section 101 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, challenging an order dated 23 April 2025 passed by Respondent No.4. The petitioner sought dismissal of the writ petition on the ground that it was not pressed with liberty to challenge the order. The court examined whether the petition was indeed pressed with liberty. Finding that the petition was not pressed with such liberty, the court dismissed the writ petition. The dismissal was ordered on 18 March 2026 by Justice Prakash Padia.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition was pressed with liberty to challenge the order dated 23-04-2025 passed by Respondent No.4.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • Section 101
  • U.P. Revenue Code
  • liberty to challenge
  • dismissal

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                                WRIT - C No. - 5577 of 2026

                                    Smt Rama Devi Shukla
                                                                                                          .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                             Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 4 Others
                                                                                                        .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                       :   Santosh Kumar Pandey
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                       :   C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 6
                                                           HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.

                                    1. After some arguments, a prayer has been made by the counsel for the petitioner to
                                    dismiss the present writ petition as not pressed with liberty to challenge the order
                                    dated 23.04.2025 passed by the Respondent No.4 in the proceedings initiated by the
                                    petitioner under Section 101 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.


                                    2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed.



                                                                                                      (Prakash Padia,J.)
                                    March 18, 2026
                                    Swati




Digitally signed by :-
SWATI PATHAK
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.