Allahabad High Court
LATA YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME AND 7 OTHERS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed off/Decided on merits
Holding
The petition is dismissed for default due to the petitioners' non‑appearance.
Summary
Petitioners Lata Yadav and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners at the revised call, while the State's counsel was present. The Court inferred that the petitioners were no longer interested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for default. The interim order, if any, was vacated.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for default when petitioners fail to appear at the revised call
Subjects
- writ petition
- default dismissal
- non‑appearance
- interim order vacated
- High Court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - C No. - 5944 of 2025
Lata Yadav And Another
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home
And 7 Others .....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vikas Yadav, Arpit Dwivedi
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Suresh Chandra Srivastava
Court No. - 3
HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
1. None appears on behalf of the petitioner(s), even in the revised call.
2. Shri Prakhar Mishra, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel
appearing on behalf of the State respondent(s) is present.
3. In light of the fact that learned counsel for the petitioners have not
appeared in the revised call, we are of the view that the petitioners are no
longer interested in pursuing this writ petition.
4. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for default.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.)
October 8, 2025
Raj
Digitally signed by :-
RAJ NIGAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench
Checking your session…