Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

MADHU VACHASPATI UCHCHATAR MADHYAMIK VIDYALAYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition was dismissed as it had become infructuous following the District Magistrate's acknowledgment of the school's existence.

Summary

The petitioner, Madhu Vachaspati Uchchatar Madhyamik Vidyalaya, filed a writ petition challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. The petitioner argued that the school’s existence was not recognized, seeking relief. Respondent No.3, the District Magistrate, subsequently acknowledged the existence of the school, rendering the petition ineffective. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petition had become infructuous. The Court held that, in view of the District Magistrate’s acknowledgment, there was no longer any ground for the writ. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed and any interim order previously granted was vacated.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition is maintainable after the District Magistrate acknowledged the existence of the school

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • school recognition
  • interim order
  • dismissal
  • jurisdiction

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                            WRIT - C No. - 66026 of 2011


                                    Madhu Vachaspati Uchchatar Madhyamik
                                    Vidyalaya                                                    .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    State of U.P. and Others
                                                                                               .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)      : Gaurav Tripathi, Ram Ram Singh, V.B.
                                                                     Yadav
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)      : C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 29
                                                      HON'BLE ARINDAM SINHA, J.
                                                      HON'BLE SATYA VEER SINGH, J.

                                    1. Mr. Gaurav Tripathi, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner
                                    and submits, the writ petition has become infructuous inasmuch as
                                    respondent no.3, (the District Magistrate) has acknowledged existence of
                                    the school. Mr. K.M. Mishra, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel
                                    appears on behalf of State.

                                    2. The writ petition is dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.



                                                                                            (Arindam Sinha,J.)



                                                                                           (Satya Veer Singh,J.)
                                    March 18, 2026
                                    VS




Digitally signed by :-
VIDYA SAGAR BARATAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.