Allahabad High Court
AMAN MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh petition due to errors in the array of respondents.
Summary
Petitioner Aman Mishra filed a writ petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petitioner’s counsel argued that there were mistakes in the way the respondents were listed (the array of respondents). The court examined the claim and found that the procedural defect warranted dismissal of the petition. The judges ordered the petition to be dismissed but granted the petitioner liberty to file a fresh petition correcting the errors. No substantive merits of the case were addressed.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition should be dismissed on account of errors in the array of respondents
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- procedural defect
- fresh petition
- array of respondents
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 7828 of 2026
Aman Mishra
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anshuman Singh, Santosh Kumar
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., R.V. Pandey
Court No. - 4
HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J.
HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.
1. Heard Sri Santosh Kumar, learned counsel for petitioner, learned standing
counsel for State and Sri R.V. Pandey, learned counsel for respondent-Bank.
2. Sri Santosh Kumar, learned counsel for petitioner submitted that there are
certain mistakes in the array of respondents, therefore, this petition may be
dismissed with liberty to file fresh.
3. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed with the aforesaid liberty.
March 19, 2026
Sartaj
(Garima Prashad,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
SARTAJ AHMAD
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…