Allahabad High Court
MANU DEEP SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHER
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed, with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition.
Summary
The petitioner, Manu Deep Sharma, filed a writ petition (Writ No. 9310 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. The court observed discrepancies in the petition and held that it was not properly pressed. Consequently, the petition was dismissed on procedural grounds. The court, however, granted the petitioner liberty to file a fresh petition addressing the deficiencies. No substantive merits of the case were considered.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate remedy when a writ petition contains discrepancies and is not pressed?
Subjects
- writ petition
- procedural defect
- dismissal
- liberty to file fresh petition
- high court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 9310 of 2026
Manu Deep Sharma
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Other
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ambuj Kumar Mishra, Vineet Kumar
Sharma
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shyam Mani Shukla
Court No. - 40
HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J.
There are certain discrepancies in the writ petition, therefore, learned
counsel for the petitioner states that the present petition may be dismissed as
not pressed with liberty to file afresh.
In such view of the fact, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with
liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition.
March 19, 2026
Sattyarth
(Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
SATTYARTH ANAND
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…