Allahabad High Court
PADAMDHARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Summary
Padamdhar filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and five other respondents. The petition was argued by senior counsel N.C. Gupta, assisted by Arjit Gupta, while the revenue side was represented by Standing Counsel Ankur Agarwal. The Court noted that a separate order had already been passed in Writ Tax No. 3909 of 2026 concerning the same matter. In view of that earlier order, the Court held that the present petition could no longer be entertained. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as infructuous.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition remains maintainable after a separate order has been passed in Writ Tax No. 3909 of 2026
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- dismissal
- Allahabad High Court
- jurisdiction
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT TAX No. - 3566 of 2026
Padamdhar
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 5 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arjit Gupta
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 39
HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J.
HON'BLE SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI, J.
1. Heard Sri N.C. Gupta, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Arjit
Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ankur Agarwal, learned
Standing Counsel for the revenue.
2. In view of the separate order passed in Writ Tax No. 3909 of 2026, the
writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Swarupama Chaturvedi,J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.)
September 29, 2026
#Vikram/-
Digitally signed by :-
VIKRAM GUPTA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…