Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

M/S AIR EXPERT INDIAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty granted to the petitioner to file an appeal within two weeks, which will be entertained on merits without limitation objections.

Summary

The petitioner, M/s Air Expert India, filed a writ petition challenging the orders dated 29 October 2025 issued by the Assistant Commissioner, State Tax Jurisdiction Sector‑4, which allegedly denied its right to appeal under Section 107 of the GST Act. The petition sought a certiorari to quash the impugned orders and a mandamus directing the respondents to permit the filing of an appeal. The Court noted a recent decision in Ms/S Sky Texpros Private Ltd. v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2026:AHC:189230‑DB) where the Commissioner was directed to issue administrative instructions allowing appeals even where electronic records showed nil demand. The State did not oppose the petitioner's request for liberty to file an appeal. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioner liberty to file an appeal within two weeks, which may be entertained on merits without limitation objections.

Issues considered

  • Whether the orders dated 29‑10‑2025 issued by the Assistant Commissioner are liable to be quashed by certiorari.
  • Whether a writ of mandamus can be issued directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to file an appeal under Section 107 of the GST Act.
  • Whether the limitation period bars the filing of such an appeal.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • GST
  • Section 107
  • certiorari
  • mandamus
  • appeal
  • limitation
  • High Court of Allahabad
  • administrative instruction

Judgment

          HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                              WRIT TAX No. - 3821 of 2026

M/S Air Expert India
                                                                   .....Petitioner(s)
                                        Versus

State Of Uttar Pradesh And Another
                                                                 .....Respondent(s)

Counsel for Petitioner(s)               :   Dheeraj Dwivedi, Pranjal Shukla
Counsel for Respondent(s)               :   C.S.C.

Court No. - 39
                 HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J.
                 HON'BLE SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI, J.

1. Heard Sri Dheeraj Dwivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri
Arvind Kumar Mishra, learned Standing Counsel for the State.

2. Present petition has been filed for the following relief:

     i) issue a writ or direction or pass an order in the nature of Certiorari
     quashing the impugned Order in MOV-09 dated notice in DRC-01/Form
     GST MOV-07 dated 29.10.2025 and the impugned order issued in GST
     Form GST MOV-09 dated 29.10.2025 issued passed by the Office of
     Assistant Commissioner, State Tax Jurisdiction Sector-4 (Mobile Squad
     6), Ghaziabad Uttar Pradesh the respondent no. 2, (Annexure No. 7 & 10
     to the writ petition);


     ii) issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to allow the
     petitioner to file an appeal against the order dated 29.10.2025 under
     Section 107 of the GST Act;

4. On the last date i.e. 16.09.2026, we have passed below quoted order:-

     "1. Presently, in view of the order passed in Ms/S Sky Texpros Private
     Ltd vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and 2 Others, 2026:AHC:189230-DB, it
     has been noticed that the Commissioner issued necessary administrative
     instructions to allow for such appeals to be filed, even in cases where the
     electronic records show nil demand.
                                                                                                       WTAX No. 3821 of 2026
                                                                          2


                                            2. Learned counsel for the petitioner may obtain fresh instructions and
                                            file necessary affidavit, if required, to establish that despite resorting to
                                            such measures, the petitioner is not being permitted to file the appeal.

                                            3. Put up as fresh on 30.09.2026."

                                    5. Today, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner may
                                    be permitted to file an appeal.

                                    6. Prayer made is not opposed by learned Standing Counsel for the State.

                                    7. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty
                                    to file an appeal.

                                    8. If such appeal is filed within a period of two weeks from today, the
                                    same may be entertained on merits without raising any objection to
                                    limitation.



                                                   (Swarupama Chaturvedi,J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.)
                                    September 30, 2026
                                    #Vikram/-




Digitally signed by :-
VIKRAM GUPTA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.