Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SANGEETA DEVIversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The court disposed of the petition without merits, directing the petitioner to file objections and the respondent to pass a reasoned order within stipulated timeframes.

Summary

The petitioner, Sangeeta Devi, applied for the issuance of Form F.L.7, which was pending before the second respondent. An adverse report dated 02‑06‑2026 was made by the Senior Superintendent of Police, Gorakhpur, and a copy was provided to the petitioner. The High Court, without examining the merits of the application, disposed of the writ petition subject to the petitioner filing objections to the police report, supported by a personal affidavit, within one week. The petitioner must also submit a copy of the order to the second respondent. The court further directed the second respondent to consider the objections and pass a reasoned order within two weeks thereafter. The order was signed by Justices Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate procedural remedy when an adverse police report is filed against a petitioner's application for Form F.L.7?
  • Can the court dispose of the writ petition without addressing the merits, directing only procedural compliance?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • Form F.L.7
  • adverse police report
  • procedural order
  • Allahabad High Court

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                          WRIT TAX No. - 3897 of 2026

                                    Sangeeta Devi
                                                                                                   .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus
                                    State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                         :   Aditya Tripathi
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                         :   C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 39
                                                  HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J.
                                                  HON'BLE SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI, J.

                                    1. At present, the petitioner's application for issuance of Form F.L.7, is
                                    pending before the respondent no. 2. An adverse report is described to have
                                    been made by the Senior Superintendent of Police, Gorakhpur, on
                                    02.06.2026. Copy of the same is available to the petitioner.

                                    2. Accordingly, without entering into the merits, the writ petition is disposed
                                    of with a direction, subject to the petitioner filing objections to the report
                                    dated 02.06.2026, supported by his personal affidavit, along with the copy of
                                    this order before respondent no. 2, within a period of one week from today,
                                    the said respondent shall proceed to pass appropriate reasoned order dealing
                                    with the objections filed by the petitioner, within a further period of two
                                    weeks thereafter.

                                    September 23,
                                    2026
                                    Bhanu         (Swarupama Chaturvedi,J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
BHANU PRATAP KUSHWAHA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.