Allahabad High Court
VINAYAK NIRMAN PRIVATE LIMITEDversusADJUDICATING AUTHORITY UNDER THE PROHIBITION OF BENAMI PROPERTY TRANSACTION ACT 1988 DELHI AND 2 OT
- Decided
Holding
The petition was dismissed as not pressed.
Summary
The petitioner, Vinayak Nirman Private Limited, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions under the Prohibition of Benami Property Transaction Act, 1988. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel, Sr. Advocate Utkarsh Khanna, informed the Court that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the petition. The respondents’ counsel, including Krishna Agarawal, raised no objection to the withdrawal. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition on the ground that it was not pressed. No substantive merits of the case were adjudicated.
Subjects
- withdrawal of writ petition
- benami property transaction act
- high court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT TAX No. - 873 of 2024
Vinayak Nirman Private Limited
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
Adjudicating Authority Under The Prohibition Of
Benami Property Transaction Act 1988 Delhi And
2 Others .....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sr. Advocate, Utkarsh Khanna
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ankur Agarwal, C.S.C., Gaurav
Mahajan, Krishna Agarawal
Court No. - 39
HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J.
HON'BLE SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI, J.
1. Sri Utkarsh Khanna, learned counsel for the petitioner states, the
petitioner does not wish to press the present writ petition any more.
2. Sri Krishna Agarawal, learned counsel for the revenue and learned
Standing Counsel have no objection.
3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
(Swarupama Chaturvedi,J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.)
September 8, 2026
Abhilash
Digitally signed by :-
ABHILASH SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…