Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

RADHIKKUMAR JAYANTIBHAI DHAMELIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

Holding

The Court allowed the bail application, granting regular bail to the applicant under the conditions specified.

Summary

The applicant, Radhikkumar Jayantibhai Dhameliya, filed a successive regular bail application under Section 483 of the Code of Criminal Procedure after a charge sheet was filed for offences under Sections 61, 316(3), 318(4), 336(3), 338 and 340(2) of the Indian Penal Code. He had been in custody since 16 March 2026 and claimed he played no vital role in the alleged forgery and that further detention was unwarranted. The State opposed bail, arguing the seriousness of the accusations and the applicant's conduct. The Court examined the material, noting that the prosecution’s case relied mainly on documentary evidence, the co‑accused had already been granted bail, and the prosecution failed to show a need for continued custody. Considering that the trial would be lengthy and continued detention served no purpose, the Court allowed the bail application. The applicant was released on regular bail upon execution of a personal bond of Rs.10,000 with one surety and subject to standard conditions.

Issues considered

  • Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail after the filing of a charge sheet under Section 483 CrPC despite the seriousness of the offences.
  • Whether the prosecution has demonstrated a necessity for the applicant's continued custody.
  • Whether the conditions imposed are sufficient to safeguard the interests of justice.

Legislation cited

Subjects

regular bailSection 483 CrPCsuccessive bailcharge sheetIndian Penal CodeGujarat High Courtbail conditions

Judgment

     R/CR.MA/13168/2026                          ORDER DATED: 12/06/2026




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

 R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR SUCCESSIVE REGULAR BAIL -
            AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 13168 of 2026

==========================================================
                    RADHIKKUMAR JAYANTIBHAI DHAMELIYA
                                  Versus
                            STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR. RAAJEN D JADHAV(10026) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR RONAK RAVAL APP for the Respondent No. 1
MR ANIRUDH SUCHAK for original complainant
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA

                             Date : 12/06/2026

                               ORAL ORDER


                        ORAL ORDER
1.      Rule. Learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of
        respondent State.


2.      The applicant,       by way of this successive bail
        application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS,
        seeks regular bail in connection with the FIR being
        C.R. No. 11201001250017 of 2025 registered
        with CID Crime Gandhinagar Police Station,
        Dist. Gandhinagar, for the offences punishable
        under Sections 61, 316(3), 318(4), 336(3), 338 and
        340(2) (as per FIR / 316(5) (as per chargesheet).

3.      It is the submission of learned counsel for the
        applicant that he is suffering confinement since
        16.03.2026. He further submitted that the applicant


                                 Page 1 of 4
     R/CR.MA/13168/2026                                      ORDER DATED: 12/06/2026




        has not played any vital role in the alleged offence.
        Hence,            further   detention         of   the     applicant           is
        unwarranted.

4.      Learned           APP    has   opposed         the    bail     application
        contending that, considering the conduct of the
        applicant and nature of accusation, the discretion
        may not be exercised in favour of the applicant.


5.      Having heard the learned counsel for the respective
        parties and upon perusal of the material placed on
        record, it appears that, during investigation Rs.10
        lakhs being paid by the applicant to the complainant.
        The prosecution case is based on documentary
        evidence and investigation on the aspect of forgery
        etc     already         been   over.         The   co-accused         Daksh
        Goswami has been granted bail by the coordinate
        bench of this Court. The prosecution failed to
        demonstrate further custody of the applicant is
        necessary. In such circumstances, when chargesheet
        is filed and trial would take considerable time,
        keeping behind the applicant behind bar, would not
        serve any purpose. Hence, the bail application is
        allowed.


     6. Hence, the applicant is ordered to be released on
        regular bail in connection with the FIR being C.R.


                                       Page 2 of 4
     R/CR.MA/13168/2026                      ORDER DATED: 12/06/2026




        No. 11201001250017 of 2025 registered with
        CID Crime Gandhinagar Police Station, Dist.
        Gandhinagar, on executing a personal bond of
        Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousands only), with one
        surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the
        learned Trial Court and subject to the conditions that
        he shall:


         No.                    Conditions
         (a) not take undue advantage of liberty or
             misuse liberty;
         (b) not act in a manner injuries to the interest of
             the prosecution;
         (c) surrender passport, if any, to the lower court
             within a week;
         (d) not leave India without prior permission of
             the Sessions Judge concerned;
         (e) furnish latest address of residence to the
             Investigating Officer and also to the Court at
             the time of execution of the bond and shall
             not change the residence without prior
             permission of the trial Court;




7.    The authorities shall release the applicant if he is not
      required in connection with the any other offence. If
      breach of any above condition is committed, the
      Sessions Judge concerned shall take appropriate
      action or issue warrant against the applicant. The bail


                              Page 3 of 4
         R/CR.MA/13168/2026                                                               ORDER DATED: 12/06/2026




            bond to be executed before the learned trial Court
            having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for
            the sessions judge concerned to delete, modify and/or
            relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with
            law. Nothing stated hereinabove, shall tantamount to
            the expression of any opinion on the merits of this
            case. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent.
            Direct service permitted.



                                                                                               (ILESH J. VORA,J)
   P.S. JOSHI


Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: PALLAV SUBHASHCHANDRA JOSHI(HC00177), Principal Pvt. Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 12/06/2026 16:58:25




                                                          Page 4 of 4


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "regular bail"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.