Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

SAYRA ASRAFKHAN PATHAN (SAYRABIBI D/O. AHMEDBHAI PATEL)versusASRAFKHAN WAHIDKHAN PATHAN

Disposal
27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Holding

The application for condonation of delay is dismissed for default, and the main revision application does not survive.

Summary

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of delay in a revision proceeding dated 2025. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner during the hearing, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the matter. The court observed that the application remained pending for an extended period and the petitioner had not prosecuted the case. Consequently, the court dismissed the condonation application for default due to want of prosecution. As a result, the main revision application was also deemed not to survive.

Issues considered

  • Whether a condonation of delay application can be entertained when the petitioner fails to appear and prosecute the case.

Subjects

condonation of delaycriminal revisiondefaultprosecutiondismissal

Judgment

   R/CR.MA/5332/2025                           ORDER DATED: 20/02/2026




   IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD


 R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION
              OF DELAY) NO. 5332 of 2025
    In F/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION/5734/2025

================================================
      SAYRA ASRAFKHAN PATHAN (SAYRABIBI D/O.
                   AHMEDBHAI PATEL)
                           Versus
       ASRAFKHAN WAHIDKHAN PATHAN & ORS.
================================================
Appearance:
KHUSHBU H DANECHA(7099) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
NOTICE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 2
O I PATHAN(7684) for the Respondent(s) No. 1,3,4
MR PRANAV DHAGAT, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 5
================================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL

                         Date : 20/02/2026

                          ORAL ORDER


     When the matter is called out, none is present on behalf of
the applicant. The matter is of 2025 and still on the stage of delay
condonation. It appears that the applicant is no more interested in
the matter. Hence, this application for condonation of delay is
dismissed for default, for want of prosecution.              Notice is
discharged.




                              Page 1 of 2
     R/CR.MA/5332/2025                                                             ORDER DATED: 20/02/2026




         In view of application for condonation of delay is dismissed
for default, main revision application does not survive.



                                                                                         [ P. M. Raval, J. ]
hiren/DB/1/6tss20226




   Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
   Digitally signed by: HIREN VIRENDRABHAI MER(HC00351), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 20/02/2026 14:16:53


                                                    Page 2 of 2


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "condonation of delay"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.