Created byFuzzy Cloud| Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
61 judgments delivered by benches including this judge.
Surajsinh Rupsinh Rajput filed a criminal revision application (R/CR.RA/497/2010) against the State of Gujarat. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Bhushan B. Oza, sought extension of probation benefits. The court ordered the Probation Officer to submit a report, which included the applicant's death certificate showing he die…
The applicant, originally convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to one year imprisonment with a fine, filed a criminal revision challenging the conviction. The High Court had earlier ordered the applicant's legal heirs to deposit Rs.5,000 as cost in connection with a substitution o…
The Gujarat State Co‑operative Agriculture and Rural Development Bank Ltd. filed a criminal revision application 169 days after the judgment of the Sessions Judge, seeking condonation of the delay. The bank explained that the delay was due to obtaining certified copies, seeking legal advice, and gathering necessary doc…
Manojbhai Jayantibhai Talpada was sentenced to 510 days’ simple imprisonment for failing to pay maintenance arrears of Rs 1,20,000 and a cost of Rs 2,000, as ordered by the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Anand. The applicant subsequently deposited Rs 60,000 towards the arrears and, by 14 August 2026, had already …
The petitioner, Vijaypari Lalpari Goswami, who is serving a 360‑day imprisonment for non‑payment of maintenance, filed a criminal revision application challenging a Sessions Judge's conviction. The revision was filed 168 days after the impugned judgment, and the petitioner sought condonation of this delay, explaining t…
Vijaybhai Mohanbhai Shah was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to one year imprisonment and a fine. The original complainant later received a settlement of Rs.5,00,000 and voluntarily agreed to compound the offence. Both parties filed a criminal revision seeking quash of the co…
Zakirbhai Ganibhai Mankad was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to one year imprisonment and a fine. He filed a criminal revision and a misc application seeking to quash the conviction, alleging an amicable settlement with the complainant, Shankarbhai Solanki, who received a ca…
Mohmand Talha Susiwala, convicted under the Negotiable Instruments Act, was sentenced to one year of simple imprisonment and completed the term, being released on 27 July 2024. He filed a criminal revision application challenging the conviction and, concurrently, a regular bail application. The High Court examined the …
The petition filed by Ajaysinh Poonamsinh Rathod sought condonation of a 261‑day delay in filing a criminal revision against a judgment of the Family Court, Vadodara. Both parties agreed that the matter was amicably settled and that the delay was not intentional. The court examined Supreme Court precedents, notably Col…
The accused, Nileshkumar Rameshbhai Parmar, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonoured cheque and sentenced to one year imprisonment with a compensation order of Rs.7,30,000. He appealed, but the conviction was upheld by the Additional Sessions Judge. Subsequently, the o…
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of delay in a revision proceeding dated 2025. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner during the hearing, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the matter. The court observed that the application remained pending for an extended p…
The petitioner filed a criminal revision application (No. 315 of 2020) seeking maintenance, after a prior criminal miscellaneous application for condonation of delay (No. 4276 of 2020) was dismissed by the High Court on 30 September 2025. The revision application remained pending because it was inadvertently not dispos…
Mahesh Kumar Harilal Rajpara appealed a conviction under Section 467 of the Indian Penal Code for forgery, which had been upheld by the Additional Sessions Judge. The appellant argued that the prosecution’s case was weak, citing the absence of handwriting expert analysis, lack of specimen signatures, and no recovery pa…
Kirtibhai Keshavlal Patel filed a criminal revision application challenging a conviction, but the application was filed 176 days after the judgment. The applicant sought condonation of the delay, explaining that certified copies, legal advice, and necessary documents took time to obtain and that the delay was not inten…
The liquidator of M/s Champion Agro Ltd. filed a criminal revision application before the Gujarat High Court challenging an order of a subordinate court in a matter involving the Directorate of Enforcement. The applicant contended that the charges had already been framed, rendering the revision infructuous, and sought …
Rasilaben Suvashchandra Ganatra filed a criminal case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against Minaben Rameshbhai Garnara, who was convicted by the 6th Additional Senior Civil Judge, Rajkot. The conviction was appealed, and the Sessions Court set aside the judgment and remanded the matter for fresh c…
The applicant, Javed Khalil Ansari, filed a criminal revision application seeking permission to withdraw the proceeding and to file an appropriate application before the trial court. The learned counsel, Mr. Shivam R. Joshi, requested liberty to withdraw, which the court granted. The court ordered that the matter stand…
The petitioner filed Criminal Revision Application No.814 of 2016 under the domestic violence provisions. While the revision was pending, the parties resolved the dispute through mediation at the District Court, Patan, and executed a settlement report dated 10 June 2025. The settlement included an affidavit by the peti…
The petitioners, Ronak Prakashbhai Gohil and another, filed a criminal revision application challenging an order of a subordinate court. They later informed the High Court that the charge had already been framed by the trial court and sought permission to withdraw the revision. The learned counsel for the petitioners r…
The applicant, Smit Maratha, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking to quash and set aside the FIR/Order. The applicant’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the application, reserving the right to file a fresh application after the charge-sheet is filed. The Court considered whether such withdrawal co…
The applicant filed criminal miscellaneous applications seeking to quash and set aside an FIR and order. Subsequently, the applicant sought the court's permission to withdraw these applications. The court considered the request and granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the applications were dismissed as withdra…
The applicant filed criminal miscellaneous applications seeking to quash and set aside an FIR and order. Subsequently, the applicant sought the court's permission to withdraw these applications. The court considered the request and granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the applications were dismissed as withdra…
The applicants, Maganbhai Babubhai Rathod and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking to quash and set aside the FIR and order. They later approached the court through counsel Ms. Kiran Udasi, requesting permission to withdraw the application and to be allowed to file a fresh application after the c…
The State of Gujarat filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of a 265‑day delay in filing Criminal Appeal No. 5213/2026. The respondent, Shaileshbhai Dhirajlal Joshi, neither appeared in person nor through counsel despite notice being served. The Court examined the explanations provided in the ap…
The State of Gujarat filed a criminal appeal but delayed filing it by 54 days. The State then moved an application under Order 54 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking condonation of this delay. The respondent’s counsel waived service of the rule. The court examined the explanations provided for the delay and found th…
The applicant, Chandrajit @Dipak Kalidas Rathod, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of a 168‑day delay in filing his criminal appeal. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, waived service of the rule. Counsel for both sides were heard. The court found that the reasons given for the delay were…
The applicant, Akhtarali, filed a criminal appeal against the State of Gujarat more than 201 days after the prescribed period and sought condonation of the delay. The respondent State, through its counsel, waived service of the rule. The High Court examined the explanations provided in the condonation application. Find…
The petitioners, Bachubhai Dahyabhai Patel and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking to quash and set aside FIR/Order No. 9513 of 2026. They later sought permission to withdraw the application and requested liberty to file a fresh application after the charge-sheet is filed. The respondent, State …
Ashokbhai Shivlal Rana filed a criminal miscellaneous application and a criminal appeal that had been dismissed for failure to remove office objections. The applicant sought restoration of both proceedings. The State of Gujarat opposed the restoration. The court considered the procedural lapse and the applicant's reque…
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of a 122‑day delay in filing a criminal appeal. The respondent waived service of notice. The court examined the application and found that the delay was not wholly unexplained. Consequently, the court exercised its discretion to condone the d…
The appellant, Ramgopal Nanulal Razak, filed a criminal appeal before the Gujarat High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died on 26 October 2014, and a death certificate was produced. The appellant’s counsel informed the Court that the legal heirs were unwilling to pursue the matter. The Court con…
The applicant filed a criminal appeal 71 days after the prescribed period and sought condonation of the delay. The respondent State waived service of the rule. The Court examined the explanations provided in the application and found them satisfactory. Consequently, the Court held that the delay was sufficiently explai…
The applicant, Dipakbhai Kotvadiya, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of a 560‑day delay in filing his criminal appeal against the State of Gujarat. The respondent State, through its counsel, waived service of the rule. The Court examined the explanations provided for the delay and found th…
The applicant, Harkhabhai Virambhai Gagabhai Thakor, filed a criminal appeal against the State of Gujarat but missed the prescribed filing deadline by ten days. He filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of this delay. The respondent State, through its counsel, waived service of the rule. The cou…
Abdul Basit Mohammad Bilal Qureshi filed a criminal appeal against the State of Gujarat but delayed filing it by 42 days. He applied to the High Court of Gujarat for condonation of this delay. The respondent State, represented by counsel, did not contest the service of the rule. The Court examined the explanation provi…
The applicant, Samiruddin @ Bond, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of a 44‑day delay in filing his criminal appeal against the State of Gujarat. The respondent State waived service of the rule. The sole issue was whether the 44‑day delay could be condoned under procedural law. The court ex…
Somnathbhai Ramjibhai Vajnabhai Gamit, the sole appellant in a criminal appeal against his conviction, died on 14 February 2026 while incarcerated at Lajpor Central Jail, Surat. The appellant’s counsel, Mr. Yogendra Thakore, had filed the appeal, and the State was represented by Ms. C.M. Shah. The court examined the ja…
The applicant, Parth Ganesh Mandaliya, filed a criminal appeal against the State of Gujarat but delayed filing the appeal by 23 days. He filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of this delay. The respondent State did not contest service of the rule. The Court examined the explanation provided for…
The applicant, Shaileshbhai Babubhai Katara, filed a criminal appeal after a delay of 480 days and sought condonation of that delay. The respondent State of Gujarat waived service of the rule. The Court examined the explanations offered for the delay and found them satisfactory. Consequently, the Court ordered that the…
The applicants, who were convicted and sentenced to various terms for offences under IPC sections 420, 468, 471 and 120‑B, filed a regular bail application under Section 389 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking suspension of their sentences pending appeal. The trial court had earlier suspended the sentences and relea…
The State of Gujarat filed a criminal appeal (No. 314 of 2011) against Dharamvirsingh Shiyotasingh Yadav. The respondent’s counsel submitted a death certificate showing that the sole respondent had died on 21 February 2026. The court examined the certificate and noted that the death was duly registered with the Junagad…
The applicant, Kalpesh @ Kalu @ Daud, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of a 119‑day delay in filing his criminal appeal against the State of Gujarat. The respondent State waived service of the rule. The court examined the explanations provided for the delay and found them satisfactory. Con…
The applicant filed a criminal appeal 13 days after the prescribed period and sought condonation of the delay. The respondent State waived service of the rule. The court examined the explanation provided for the delay and found it satisfactory. Consequently, the court held that the delay could be condoned. The applicat…
The applicant filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of a 203‑day delay in filing a criminal appeal. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, waived service of notice. The Court examined whether the delay was sufficiently explained to merit condonation. It found that the delay was not totally unexp…
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of an 18‑day delay in filing a criminal appeal against the State of Gujarat. The respondent waived service of notice. The court examined whether the delay was satisfactorily explained. It held that the delay was not totally unexplained and th…
The petitioner, Maksudmiya Mohadmiya Shaikh, filed an application seeking condonation of a 143‑day delay in filing a criminal appeal against the State of Gujarat. The respondent, the State, waived service of notice. The Court examined whether the delay was satisfactorily explained. It found that the delay was not wholl…
The applicant filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of a 51‑day delay in filing a criminal appeal against the State of Gujarat. The respondent waived service of notice. The court examined the application and found that the delay was not wholly unexplained. Consequently, the court held that the …
The applicant, Kalpeshbhai Sureshbhai Harijan, filed an application before the Gujarat High Court seeking condonation of a 13‑day delay in filing a criminal appeal against the State of Gujarat. The applicant’s counsel waived service of notice on the respondent State. The court examined the content of the application an…
The appellant, Naresh @ Lalo Rayaji Rathod, was convicted in a Special POCSO trial for offences under IPC sections 363, 366, 376 and POCSO sections 4 and 6, and was sentenced to simple imprisonment for each count. On appeal under Section 374 CrPC, the appellant argued that the trial court erred by imposing simple impr…
The applicant, Jayesh Makwana, filed a criminal appeal against the State of Gujarat but delayed filing it by 42 days. He filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of this delay. The respondent State, through counsel, waived service of the rule. The Court examined the explanation provided for the de…
The applicant, Chauhan Savitaben, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of an 83‑day delay in filing a criminal appeal against the State of Gujarat. The applicant waived service of notice on behalf of the respondent. Counsel for both sides were heard, and the court examined the explanations pro…
The applicant, Ajay @ Shivo Manilal Tirgar, filed a criminal appeal against the State of Gujarat but delayed filing it by 213 days. The respondent State, through counsel, waived service of the rule. The applicant sought condonation of the delay, arguing sufficient explanation for the lapse. The Court examined the expla…
The applicant filed a miscellaneous application seeking condonation of a 329‑day delay in filing Criminal Appeal No. 587 of 2026 against the State of Gujarat. The Additional Public Prosecutor, representing the State, waived service of the rule. Both parties appeared before Justice S.V. Pinto, who examined the explanati…
The applicant, Vasudevbhai Narmadashankar Pandya, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking successive regular bail after the filing of a chargesheet. The trial court had examined 19 prosecution witnesses and was nearing the conclusion of the trial. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Viral Vyas, requested permission…
Mohammad Javed filed an application seeking condonation of a 78‑day delay in filing Criminal Appeal No. 1008 of 2026 before the High Court of Gujarat. The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service of the rule. The Court examined the explanations offered for the delay and found them satisfac…
The petitioner, Jigar Mukeshbhai Brahmbhatt, filed an application seeking condonation of a 104‑day delay in preferring Criminal Appeal No. 1177 of 2026 against the State of Gujarat. The Additional Public Prosecutor, on behalf of the State, waived service of the rule. Both parties appeared before Hon’ble Ms. Justice S.V…
The applicant, Kantibhai @ BhuriYo Ratilal Panchal, filed an application seeking condonation of a 24‑day delay in filing Criminal Appeal No. 1425 of 2026 against the State of Gujarat. The respondent, the State, waived service of the rule. The sole issue was whether the court could condone the delay. The court examined …
The applicant, Tapu @ Rameshbhai Jikabhai Baraiya, filed an application seeking condonation of a 336‑day delay in preferring Criminal Appeal No. 911 of 2026 before the High Court of Gujarat. The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service of the rule. The court examined the explanations provi…
Jigneshbhai Dineshbhai Halpati filed a criminal appeal but delayed filing it by 335 days. He applied to the High Court of Gujarat for condonation of this delay. The respondent State of Gujarat did not contest service of the application. The Court examined the explanations provided for the delay and found them satisfact…
The applicant, Rakeshbhai Kaliyabhai Baria, filed an application seeking condonation of a 31‑day delay in filing Criminal Appeal No. 46949 of 2025 against the State of Gujarat. The Additional Public Prosecutor, on behalf of the State, waived service of the rule. The Court examined the explanations provided for the dela…
The petitioners filed an application seeking condonation of a 341‑day delay in preferring Criminal Appeal No. 52363 of 2025 against the State of Gujarat. The Additional Public Prosecutor, on behalf of the State, waived service of the rule. The court examined the explanations offered for the delay and found them satisfa…
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.
