Created by Fuzzy Cloud

ARUN KUMAR JHA

744 judgments · newest first · showing 201–400

Rinku KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Rinku Kumari, filed a petition seeking cancellation of the bail granted to the accused, Sunil Kumar Thakur, alleging that he had submitted a forged Panchnama dated 28‑08‑2022 and had threatened her and her family. The accused contended that the Panchnama was genuine and that any …

Sonali KumariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, two women from Hathiyar village, sought bail fearing arrest in a Bodhgaya police case alleging assault under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable and Securities Act. The prosecution alleged that they, along with co‑accused, assaulted an informant with a rod, causing a head …

Maskoor Alam @Md.Maskoor AlamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners sought relief from imminent arrest in a 2018 case (Raniganj PS No.391) alleging offences under several IPC sections arising from a land dispute. The prosecution alleged that co‑accused Wasil assaulted the informant, causing grievous injuries, while the petitioners denied any …

Niranjan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Niranjan Yadav, sought bail in connection with a criminal case (Nabinagar P.S. Case No. 295 of 2025) alleging assault, robbery and other offences under several sections of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner assaulted the informant's husband, causing a scalp wound, …

Dropadi DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Dropadi Devi, the mother‑in‑law of the complainant, was implicated in a dowry harassment case (Naugachia Mahila P.S. Case No. 35 of 2025) alleging demand of Rs 5 lakhs and physical/mental torture under IPC sections 498A, 341, 323, 504, 506 read with 34 and D.P. Act sections 3 and 4. The petitioner …

Soni DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, who are relatives of an informant, sought bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (Gaya Muffasil P.S. Case No. 911 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 85 and 74 read with Section 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. The prosecution alleged …

Md. Arsad @ BhuttaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners sought bail fearing arrest in a case (Rosera P.S. No.217/2025) alleging offences under Sections 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 352 and 110 of the B.N.S. The prosecution claimed the petitioners demolished an informant's house, assaulted him and that Md. Hira delivered a Khanti blow. The …

Awadh Rai @ Avadya RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Awadh Rai was named in PS Kesariya Case No. 398 of 2025 for alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, including assault and grievous hurt. The prosecution alleges that Rai and co‑accused assaulted an informant with a lathi, danda and an iron‑rod‑fitted bicycle chain, causing multiple …

Malay Kumar MishraversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Malay Kumar Mishra was named by an informant in FIR No. 566 of 2025 for allegedly firing at the informant, violating Section 109 read with Section 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, alleging the case was filed maliciously due to political …

IndiaversusSri Pranay Raj,

DISPOSED

The petitioners, senior officials of the North East Frontier Railway, filed a writ petition against the respondent, a former Loco Inspector now serving as a Loco Pilot, seeking to challenge his suitability for the post of Loco Inspector. In a supplementary affidavit, the petitioners admitted that …

IndiaversusAmol Kumar Singh

DISPOSED

The petition challenged the Central Administrative Tribunal's order that quashed damage rent levied on the respondent for unauthorized occupation of a railway quarter at Jamalpur. The respondent had been allowed to retain the quarter on educational grounds until 15 April 2019, after which he was …

Prayagadhwaj Yadav @ PrayagversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Prayagadhwaj Yadav, owned a Hyundai Venue that he had rented out via a Zoom Car application. The vehicle was seized by police on 21 June 2024 after 350.250 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from it, and a Sub‑Divisional Magistrate ordered its confiscation and auction on 1 July …

Subhash Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Subhash Kumar Singh, filed a writ petition seeking the release of his godown that had been seized by the Excise Department in connection with the recovery of 1,107.360 litres of illicit foreign liquor. The seizure was made under Sections 30(a), 32(i)(iii), 36, 41(i)(ii), 56(b) and 62 …

Manoj Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Manoj Kumar Yadav, filed a writ petition seeking the release of a Tata truck seized under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for alleged involvement in the recovery of illicit foreign liquor. The High Court granted the petitioner liberty to file …

Sri Binod SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Binod Singh, challenged the confiscation of a room in his property after illicit liquor was seized from that premises during a raid, where the tenant Sudhir Kumar was arrested. The lower authorities had sealed the room on 31 July 2024 and later ordered its confiscation on 14 December …

M/s. Kuber Metal and Power TradingversusThe Union of India

DISPOSED

M/s Kuber Metal and Power Trading filed a writ petition challenging an ex‑parte GST assessment order dated 12‑02‑2024 and subsequent appellate orders that imposed a liability of Rs 16,26,025 for the period Oct‑2019 to Jan‑2020. The petitioner alleged that the assessment and appellate authorities …

Ishwar Chandra SharmaversusThe Union of India

DISPOSED

Petitioner Ishwar Chandra Sharma filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 27.03.2025 of the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Bihar & Jharkhand, which declined his request to compound an offence under Section 276B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the FY 2012-13. He contended that …

Vishal BijpuriaversusThe Principle Chief Commissioner

ALLOWED

Vishal Bijpuria filed a writ petition challenging a notice issued under section 148A of the Income Tax Act for reassessment of AY 2018-19, contending that the income was already disclosed in the original return and accepted under section 143(1)(a). He also argued that the Income Tax Officer …

Vishal BijpuriaversusThe Principle Chief Commissioner

ALLOWED

Vishal Bijpuria filed a writ petition challenging a notice issued under Section 148A of the Income Tax Act and the subsequent reassessment proceedings for AY 2019-20, contending that he had already disclosed the alleged escaped income in his return which was accepted under Section 143(1)(a). He also …

Reema KumariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, three unmarried women aged 20‑22, applied for bail after being implicated in a case (PS No. 514 of 2025) alleging assault on the informant's family under several sections of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners assaulted the informant's mother with an iron rod, …

Rakesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, five members of the Saw family, sought relief from imminent arrest in a criminal case (Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 363 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, along with others, assaulted the informant's family …

Guddu yadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners – five residents of Semrhi village – were implicated in a police case (Yadopur PS Case No.198 of 2025) for alleged assault on an informant and his father, allegedly using lathis, rods and a spear. The prosecution alleged offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(2), 109, …

Md. SarfarazversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Sarfaraz, was implicated in a case (PS No. 175 of 2024) alleging offences under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 379, 385, 307 and 354(B) of the Indian Penal Code, including assault, robbery, extortion and attempted outrage of modesty. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and …

Chandan Kumar @ Chandan RajversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, sought relief fearing arrest in a case (PS‑730/2025) alleging offences under several sections of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that a co‑accused, Abhishek Kumar, called an informant, after which the petitioner and other co‑accused …

Amla DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Amla Devi, a 69‑year‑old mother‑in‑law, was implicated in a murder case (PS No.1011 of 2025) alleging that she and co‑accused electrocuted and hanged the sister of an informant. The prosecution relied on Sections 103(1) and 61(2) of the B.N.S. while the defence argued that the post‑mortem report did …

Mausam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Mausam Kumar, a former Technical Assistant of a Gram Panchayat, sought bail fearing arrest in a case (Morkahi PS Case No.175 of 2025) alleging offences under IPC sections 406, 409, 419, 420, 467, 468 and 120(B) for alleged defalcation of scheme funds. The FIR was lodged nine years …

Sarswati Devi @ Sita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sarswati Devi, sought relief fearing arrest in a case (Sahiyara PS Case No. 203 of 2025) alleging offences under sections 126(1), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 352 and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with other accused, abused the …

Raja SahniversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Raja Sahni filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court challenging an action of the State of Bihar. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Krishna Kumar Yadav, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The Court considered whether a petition may be withdrawn at the …

Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, filed a civil miscellaneous petition in the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and three private respondents. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel submitted that the matter had become infructuous and requested permission to withdraw the petition. …

Arun Kumar SinghversusThe Union of India

DISPOSED

The petitioners, two railway employees, challenged an order dated 19‑08‑2025 issued by the Deputy Chief Personnel Officer of East Central Railway. They sought liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) to contest that order, while requesting that the interim order dated 13‑08‑2025 …

Dhanu PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Dhanu Paswan filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the release of his TVS motorcycle, which was seized after two individuals riding it were found with 1.5 litres of illicit liquor. The petitioner was not named in the FIR and claimed no involvement in the offence. The court examined Rule …

Rajesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rajesh Kumar filed a writ petition seeking the release of a tempo seized under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for alleged possession of 300 litres of illicit liquor. The petitioner requested liberty to file an application under Rule 12A of the Bihar …

Arvind KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Arvind Kumar petitioned the Patna High Court for the release of his vehicle seized under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 after 800 ml of illicit foreign liquor was recovered from the driver. The State argued that confiscation proceedings were underway but …

Pankaj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pankaj Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking the release of a tempo seized under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for alleged possession of illicit liquor. The petition argued that the vehicle could be released upon payment of a penalty by filing an …

Ranjeet Paswan @ Ranjit Paswan @ Ranjit KumarversusThat State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjeet Paswan, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 19‑05‑2025 of the Assistant Commissioner Prohibition that confiscated his vehicle (Reg. No. BR01BH9925). The petitioner sought to set aside the order and requested liberty to file an appeal under Section 92 of the …

Rahul Raj Kumar @ Rahul RajversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, a driver of an Ola‑registered Alto, was stopped by police who recovered illicit liquor from four passengers but none from the driver or the vehicle. The Additional Collector ordered the vehicle’s release only upon payment of a penalty, which the Excise Commissioner later modified to …

Md. Mehebub Alam QuraishiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Md. Mehebub Alam Quraishi filed a writ petition seeking release of his four‑wheel vehicle seized by Buxar Excise Police for allegedly transporting 100 ml of illicit liquor, invoking Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018/2022. The State argued that …

Ritesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ritesh Kumar filed a writ petition seeking the release of his Scorpio vehicle seized under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 in connection with an illicit liquor case. The petitioner asked the court to allow him to file an application under Rule 12A of the Bihar …

Upendra PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Upendra Prasad sought a writ directing the State of Bihar and its officials to de‑seal his house, which had been sealed under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 after the recovery of illicit foreign liquor and beer. The petitioner requested liberty to file an …

Suraj PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Suraj Prasad challenged two orders: one dated 17‑06‑2025 by the Commissioner of Excise dismissing his appeal, and another dated 02‑04‑2025 by the Sub‑divisional Magistrate directing confiscation of his Tata Magic vehicle seized under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged …

Sadhu PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sadhu Prasad, challenged the confiscation of his tractor by the Excise authorities under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging it was seized for alleged involvement in illicit liquor. His appeal against the Collector‑cum‑District Magistrate’s order dismissing the …

Ankit Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ankit Kumar Yadav, sought the release of a Tata truck seized under Section 30a of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for alleged involvement in illicit liquor recovery. The High Court was asked to grant liberty to file an application under Rule 12A of the Bihar Prohibition …

Jagdeo PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Jagdeo Prasad filed a writ petition in the Patna High Court seeking to quash three orders that had sealed his premises under Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, following the recovery of illicit liquor. The petitioner was not the owner of the premises; ownership belonged to …

Birju Kumar Mahto @ Birju KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Birju Kumar Mahto challenged the sealing of his residential premises, which also housed a warehouse, after the Excise Department seized 470 litres of cough syrup containing codeine. The seizure was made under Sections 30(a), 30(g), 32, 62 and 56(6) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, …

Ranjeet ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Ranjeet Chaudhary sought release of his house that had been sealed under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 after 5 litres of illicit country‑made liquor were recovered from his premises. He requested liberty to file an application under Rule 12B of …

Anil PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Anil Prasad filed a writ petition seeking the release of his four-wheeler, which was seized under Sections 281, 125(a) and 125(b) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, after he was booked for rash and negligent driving while intoxicated …

Seepahi RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Seepahi Ray filed a writ petition seeking release of his auto seized after police found one litre of illicit country-made liquor in the vehicle, invoking Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. The State argued that release could only be obtained by …

Bagra and SonsversusThe Union of India

DISPOSED

Bagra and Sons filed a writ petition seeking the provisional release of 34,650 kg of betel nuts seized by customs under Section 110(A) of the Customs Act, 1962. The petitioner had filed an application for release on 11 December 2025, which remained pending without a reasoned order. The petition …

M/S MAA BHAGWATI TRADERS,versusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, M/s Maa Bhagwati Traders, filed a writ petition challenging the dismissal of its appeal by the Additional Commissioner of State Tax, which was dismissed as time‑barred, and also contested the cancellation of its GST registration. The High Court noted that the appeal was indeed filed …

Bhogendra Kumar Kamat @ Bhogendra KamatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, a proprietor of a computer hardware business, filed a writ petition challenging two orders: one dated 17‑04‑2025 by the State Tax Additional Commissioner (Appeal) that dismissed his appeal on the ground of delay, and another dated 13‑01‑2022 by the Joint Commissioner that cancelled …

Gopal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Gopal Kumar filed a writ petition in the Patna High Court seeking to quash an appellate order dated 27‑03‑2025 that dismissed his GST appeal on the ground of delay, as well as an ex‑parte order cancelling his GST registration under Section 29 of the GST Act and a related show‑cause notice. The …

Shyam JaiswalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shyam Jaiswal filed a writ petition in the Patna High Court seeking to quash an order‑in‑appeal dated 20‑06‑2025 that dismissed his GST appeal on grounds of delay, as well as an ex‑parte order cancelling his GST registration under Section 29 of the GST Act and a related show‑cause notice. The …

M/s Shivam EnterprisesversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shivam Enterprises filed a writ petition challenging appellate orders dated 01.03.2024 and 04.09.2024, a show‑cause notice dated 17.08.2020, and an ex‑parte cancellation order dated 12.09.2020, alleging that no opportunity of hearing was provided and that natural justice was violated. The petitioner …

M/S Ranveer KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petition filed by M/s Ranveer Kumar sought to quash the appellate authority’s uploading of APL‑02 on the GST portal and the show‑cause notice and ex‑parte order cancelling its GST registration, alleging violations of Sections 107(11) and 107(12) of the Bihar GST Act and the principles of natural …

Manju SinghversusThe Union of India

DISMISSED

Manju Singh filed a civil writ petition in the Patna High Court challenging actions of the Union of India, the CGST Commissioner, and the State of Bihar. The petitioner, through counsel, later moved the court to withdraw the petition. The respondent, representing the State, raised no objection to …

Priya Trading Co.versusThe Union of India

DISPOSED

Priya Trading Co., through its proprietor, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus to restore its GST registration and a certiorari to quash the cancellation order dated 22-07-2021. The petition also challenged the dismissal of its earlier appeal on grounds of delay and limitation. The Court noted …

Bandhan Kumar SinghversusThe Union of India

DISPOSED

Bandhan Kumar Singh filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash the order dated 1 September 2025 of the State Tax Additional Commissioner Appeal, Patna, which dismissed his GST appeal on the ground of delay without considering its merits. The petitioner admitted that his appeal was dismissed …

Saurabh Mishra @ Saurabh Mishr @ Saurabh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Saurabh Mishra, was implicated in a FIR (Supaul P.S. Case No. 300 of 2025) for offences including assault, causing grievous hurt and violations of the Arms Act. He alleged that the injury report showed only blunt injuries, contradicting the charge of a "Farsa" blow, and claimed the …

Bharat Bhushan @ Bharat Bhushan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bharat Bhushan Singh, sought relief from imminent arrest in a case arising from a police raid on illegal sand mining where police were attacked and tractors seized. The prosecution alleged his involvement in offences under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code, including assault …

Mousama KhatoonversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Mousama Khatoon and Tohid Alam, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a land‑dispute case (Paharkatta P.S. Case No. 117 of 2025) where they were alleged to have participated in assaults causing injuries, including a knife injury to the informant’s brother. The prosecution …

Prema DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Prema Devi sought relief from arrest in a criminal complaint (Case No. 1918 of 2023) alleging she had committed cruelty and torture under Section 498A of the IPC, and was accused of an illicit relationship with the complainant's husband. The petitioner denied all allegations, claiming the …

Vimal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Vimal Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging cheating and forgery under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that he induced the informant to pay Rs. 85,000 for admission and certificates that were …

Ashok MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Ashok Mahto, was charged with assaulting the father of an informant, resulting in the victim's death. He applied for bail for the second time after an earlier bail denial. The petitioner argued that the trial had been delayed since his custody began on 26‑10‑2024 and that this delay …

Sunita DeviversusThe Union of India

DISPOSED

Sunita Devi filed a writ petition in the Patna High Court challenging a CAT order that permitted withdrawal of her original application and dismissed her review. She sought liberty to file a representation before the Principal Chief Personnel Officer of Western Railway for redress of her grievances …

The Union Of India and OrsversusNathuni

DISPOSED

The Union of India and several railway officials filed a writ petition challenging a Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) order that directed the calculation of pension for the deceased railway employee Ramashish Yadav. The petitioners argued that the CAT’s directive to count 100% of service from …

Pawan KumarversusThe Union of India

DISPOSED

Pawan Kumar filed a writ petition challenging a Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) order that dismissed his original application without addressing its merits because a civil review petition filed by the Union of India was pending. He contended that the civil review petition had been dismissed …

Md. JawedversusThe Accountant General (A and E), Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Md. Jawed, sought appointment on compassionate ground after his father, a clerk in the Accountant General's office, died in 2015. The Departmental Screening Committee evaluated his application in 2016 and found him unfit, communicating the decision to his mother in 2017, 2018 and …

Shambhu Nath RaiversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Shambhu Nath Rai filed a writ petition challenging the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate's order that imposed a penalty of Rs 3,80,000 for the release of his vehicle seized after a small quantity of illicit liquor (875 ml) was recovered. The petitioner argued that the penalty was excessive, the vehicle’s …

Mohit LatherversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mohit Lather, filed a writ petition seeking the release of a seized Swift LXI vehicle (HR 11 R 7103) that had been confiscated in connection with a prohibition case involving 204 litres of illicit liquor. The vehicle had been ordered to be confiscated and auctioned by the …

Dharmu Kumar @ Dharmpal SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dharmu Kumar, was accused of assaulting the husband of an informant, leading to the latter's death, under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1) and 103(1) of the B.N.S.S. The prosecution's case relied mainly on the informant's wife stating that the deceased had left with the petitioner, …

Md Alisher @ BadalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md Alisher @ Badal, was arrested in connection with a case involving the alleged kidnapping and sale of a minor girl, under Sections 137(2) and 140(2) of the BNS. The victim’s statement indicated she was taken by two persons, sold, and later met the petitioner who allegedly handed …

Baiju Kumar @ Rohit @ Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners Baiju Kumar and Anil Kumar applied for bail in a theft case (PS Parsa Bazar Case No. 152 of 2025) under Sections 305(5) and 331(4) of the B.N.S., 2023. The prosecution alleged that the accused were involved in theft of several apartments, relying on a confessional statement of …

Raju Kumar Mahto @ Raju Kumar @ RajeevversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raju Kumar Mahto, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Kotwali P.S. Case No. 351 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 302, 34, 120(B) of the IPC and several provisions of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged his participation in the shooting of the informant's …

Dharmendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, a 20‑year‑old student, applied for bail in a case registered under Section 309(6) of the BNS for allegedly participating in a robbery where the informant was threatened and forced to transfer Rs.49,000 via QR code. The prosecution alleged that two persons hired the informant's …

Raj Kumar PatelversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raj Kumar Patel, was arrested at the Indo‑Nepal border while driving a stolen motorcycle and charged under Sections 317(4) and 317(5) of the BNS. He filed a bail petition, asserting a clean antecedent, that he had been in custody since 27‑Oct‑2025, and that no incriminating material …

Shankar SahuversusIndra Devi

ALLOWED

Shankar Sahu filed an application seeking restoration of Criminal Revision No. 498 of 2022, which had been dismissed on 08 September 2025 for failure to comply with an earlier order dated 19 December 2024. The petitioner argued that the reasons for non‑compliance justified reinstating the revision. …

Nitu KumariversusThe State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Patna

CONVERTED

Petitioner Nitu Kumari filed a writ petition seeking to quash an order dated 31.01.2026 of the Additional Sessions Judge which denied bail to her husband and directed her to vacate the marital home. The petition was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The Court examined …

Arun Kumar RajgariaversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Arun Kumar Rajgaria filed a criminal revision petition (No. 492 of 2025) arising from a complaint case in Banka. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Vijay Anand, sought the court's permission to withdraw the petition. The court considered the request and, without elaborating on substantive grounds, …

Neeraj Kumar @ Niraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Neeraj Kumar was arrested following a cyber‑raid that uncovered a laptop, mobile phones, ATM cards and other items, and he was charged under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act (BNS) and the Information Technology Act. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, …

Kaushlendra Pd. SinhaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Pankaj Kumar and Kaushlendra Prasad Sinha, were arrested following a police raid that seized mobile phones, SIM cards and a vehicle in connection with Nawada Cyber Police Station Case No. 165 of 2025, which alleged offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 …

Rahul PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Rahul Paswan applied for bail in a case (Asthawan P.S. Case No. 262 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 126(2), 115(1), 118(1), 109 and 3(5) of the BNS. The prosecution alleged that Paswan and co‑accused assaulted the informant’s son, who later died, with the death attributed to …

Mithlesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mithlesh Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he raped a woman, recorded a video of the act, and threatened to make it viral, as well as other offences under Sections 64, 74, 76 and 351(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that the video was …

Om Prakash Kumar @ Omprakash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Om Prakash Kumar, was arrested for alleged offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, after a stolen car with forged ownership documents was intercepted while he was driving it. He claimed he had borrowed the vehicle from a friend, was unaware of its …

Pawan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Pawan Kumar was arrested in a Mahila Police Station case alleging dowry demand of Rs. 2,00,000, assault, attempted strangulation and attempted arson against his wife. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that the injury reports were inconsistent and that he had a clean antecedent, with the …

Pankaj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Pankaj Kumar and Kaushlendra Prasad Sinha, were arrested following a police raid on a vehicle where several mobile phones and SIM cards were seized. They were charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act for alleged cyber …

RAGHUBAR BINDversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raghubar Bind, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 80 read with Section 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, alleging dowry harassment and cruelty leading to the death of his wife, the daughter of an informant. The prosecution claimed the petitioner and his mother assaulted the …

Sunil Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The appellants appealed under Section 14(A)(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the trial court's refusal to grant anticipatory bail in a case alleging assault and non‑payment of wages. They contended that the complaint was false, the police had filed a closure report, and the …

Kundan RajversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Kundan Raj, was arrested in connection with an alleged abduction and was charged under Sections 140(2) r/w 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 25(1‑Ba), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution recovered cash, an iPad and a mobile phone from him, while a loaded …

Satyam Yadav @ Satyam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Satyam Yadav and Sittu Yadav, were charged under IPC sections 341, 354A, 307, 504, 506 (read with Section 34) and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly assaulting an informant and firing at him during an attempt to seize his niece. They contended that they were falsely …

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, was arrested in connection with a robbery involving a firearm under Section 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that he and accomplices stopped a vehicle, threatened the informant with a firearm, and stole cash and a motorcycle, with …

Inzamamul @ AppuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Inzamamul @ Appu, was arrested in a police raid on a house linked to a co‑accused alleged to be running a mini gun factory. The police recovered firearms and related materials, but none were found on the petitioner. He contended that the search violated Section 103(4)(5) of the …

Murad AliversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Murad Ali, was charged under Sections 61(2) and 109 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing at an informant. He contended that he was falsely implicated, noting that his name does not appear in the FIR and the only incriminating material is a …

Anil Kumar Singh @ Doman SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Anil Kumar Singh, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 25(1‑b)a and 26 of the Arms Act after police recovered a country‑made pistol from a bush during his apprehension. The defence argued that the pistol was found without cartridges, no independent witness was …

Shrawan Kumar @ Shrawan LaheriversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Shrawan Kumar, sought bail in a case (Sarmera P.S. Case No. 208 of 2025) alleging he attacked an informant with an axe, causing severe injuries including a severed ear. The prosecution relied on the informant’s claim and a medical report indicating a human bite that amputated the …

PRABHAT KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Suraj Paswan filed a criminal miscellaneous petition seeking bail before the Patna High Court. He subsequently filed an interlocutory application requesting that the bail petition be withdrawn. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that he no longer wishes to pursue the bail relief. The court …

Aarti deviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Aarti Devi, sought bail in a murder case (Charpokhari P.S. Case No. 186 of 2025) registered under Section 140(3) of the BNS. The prosecution alleged that she was involved in the killing of the informant's brother, based partly on a confessional statement of a co‑accused and a …

Sittu Yadav @ Sintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Satyam Yadav and Sittu Yadav, were arrested in connection with a police case involving alleged assault, attempted kidnapping of a minor, and firing upon an informant, charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Arms Act, and Section 34 of the IPC. They claimed …

Manu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manu Kumar Son was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged firing under Section 109(1) read with Section 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on the confessional statements of co‑accused Vishal Kumar and Laddu Yadav, with no …

Sumit Kumar @ Amit Kumar MandalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sumit Kumar, was implicated in a theft from a Hanuman temple and charged under Sections 334(1) and 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged his involvement, while the petitioner claimed innocence, stating that recovered items did not belong to him and that …

Sachin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Sachin Kumar and Siyaram Kumar, were arrested in connection with a dacoity alleged under Sections 310(2) and 311 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, wherein a group of miscreants allegedly robbed an informant of cash, jewellery and a mobile phone. The petitioners contended that …

Ram Sagar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

CONVERTED

Ram Sagar Kumar, the petitioner, married the alleged victim Sugga Kumari after being charged in Turkauliya P.S. Case No. 673 of 2022 for offences under Sections 363, 366, 376, 504, 506/34 of the IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. He surrendered on 31.01.2026 and is in custody. He sought to quash …

Md. Ayaz Akhtar Arzoo @ Ayaz Akhtar ArzooversusThe State Of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, Md. Ayaz Akhtar Arzoo and Md. Alamgir, appealed under Section 14(A)(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the Special Judge's refusal to grant anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged mob formation, caste‑based abuse of a constable, and damage to government …

Golu Mistry @ Golu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Golu Mistry, was charged under several provisions of the Bihar Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant with an iron rod. The appellant contended that the allegations were false, arising from a land …

Shivam Kumar Singh @ Shivam Kumar @ Kallu Singh @ KalluversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Shivam Kumar Singh, was arrested during a police check when 500 grams of charas was recovered from him, leading to charges under Sections 20(b)(ii) and 29 of the NDPS Act. The petitioner claimed false implication, highlighted that the seized quantity was far below commercial levels, …

Sintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sintu Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case alleging his involvement in a staged disappearance of an informant's husband. The prosecution alleged that he harbored the missing husband, while the petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated and merely provided shelter without …

Satish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Satish Kumar was arrested in connection with the murder of the informant's grandson, alleged under Sections 103(2) and 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. The prosecution’s case is based mainly on the fact that the petitioner was last seen with the deceased, with no eyewitnesses, forensic evidence, or motive …

Satish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Satish Kumar was arrested following a police raid that recovered several mobile phones and SIM cards, leading to a cyber‑crime FIR charging him under multiple sections of the B.N.S., 2023 and the Information Technology Act. The petitioner contended that the FIR was vague, that he was falsely …

Sachin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sachin Kumar, was arrested in connection with the alleged rape and subsequent death of a minor girl, the daughter of an informant, under Sections 103(1), 70(2), 66 read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution relied on …

Priyanshu Gaurav @ HappyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, a 19‑year‑old law student, was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he conspired with his father, a driver, to abscond with Rs 90 lakh entrusted for transport to Kolkata. The prosecution claimed the amount was recovered at the petitioner's and his father's instigation, …

Sarita Kumari @ Sarita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sarita Kumari, was accused of murdering her husband based on an informant's allegation that she and her family killed him to claim his share. The prosecution alleged a conspiracy, while the petitioner’s counsel argued she was falsely implicated, highlighting a clean antecedent and …

Manishankar Singh @ Mani Singh @ Manishank SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Manishankar Singh, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 309(4) and 103 of the B.N.S., 2023, alleging involvement in a temple theft and the murder of a priest. The prosecution’s case relied primarily on the confessional statement of co-accused Md. Saddam, who admitted to …

Shyam Babu Ray @ Bhola RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Shyam Babu Ray, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Rampur Hari P.S. Case No. 144 of 2025) alleged under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023. He claimed that he was falsely implicated, asserting an alibi that he was driving a bus at the time of the incident and that …

Arjun prasadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Arjun Prasad, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 103(1), 80(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., alleging that his wife died by suicide within a year of marriage. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and co‑accused Kavita Devi conspired to murder the informant's daughter by …

SarfrazversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sarfraz, was arrested in connection with a case registered under several sections of the B.N.S., alleging that he lured a woman to Bangalore, sold her for money, and promised marriage which he later reneged. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, that the woman was …

Rohit Soni @ Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rohit Soni, was arrested in connection with the death of the informant's son, whose body was found in a village pond. The informant alleged that the petitioner strangulated his son with a cord from his pants, citing a purported confession obtained on a blank paper. The petitioner …

Nitesh Kumar @ Nitin Kumar @ Nitish Kumar @ NiteshversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nitesh Kumar, was charged in a 2020 case for offences under Sections 363, 365 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code relating to the alleged abduction and murder of an informant's son and the theft of his motorcycle. The prosecution's case relied primarily on the confessional statement of …

MEERA KUMARIversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Meera Kumari filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the respondents to execute a non-bailable warrant of arrest dated 13 June 2018 and to invoke Section 82 of the Criminal Procedure Code against respondent Jagdish Gorain. Respondent No.5 appeared before the trial court and was released on bail …

FURKAN ALAM @ MD. FURKAN ALAMversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, a BSF constable, challenged a Family Court order directing him to pay Rs 20,000 per month as maintenance to his wife, arguing that his actual salary was lower than the court’s assessment and that the wife had refused to live with him. The respondent wife contended that the order was …

SHEIKH SAFI AHMAD @ SHEKH SAFI AHEMANDversusThe State of Bihar

CONVERTED

The petitioner Sheikh Safi Ahmad filed a criminal revision petition challenging the dismissal of his appeal and the conviction affirmed by the Judicial Magistrate. The High Court examined whether, under Section 401(5) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, a revision petition can be treated as an appeal …

VIKASH KUMAR MEHTA @ VIKASH MEHTAversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The Family Court in Araria ordered the petitioner, Vikash Kumar Mehta, to pay monthly maintenance of Rs.3,000 to his wife and Rs.2,000 to each of his minor children until they attain majority or marriage. The petitioner contended that two of the children (nos. 3 and 4) were residing with him, making …

LALAN PRASAD MEHTAversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION

Lalan Prasad Mehta filed a criminal revision petition (No.116 of 2022) before the Patna High Court challenging orders of the State of Bihar and his wife Pushpa Devi. No counsel appeared for the petitioner, while the State’s assistant public prosecutor, Md. Matloob Rab, was present. The Court noted …

VIJAY YADAV @ BIJAY YADAVversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Vijay Yadav filed a criminal revision petition before the Patna High Court challenging an order of the trial court. The court had earlier directed the petitioner to file a surrender certificate by a specified date, granting a final opportunity to comply. The petitioner failed to appear on the last …

MD. ISHTIYAQ @ ISHTIYAQversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Md. Ishtiyaq, filed a criminal revision petition but later reached a settlement with the respondents and sought the court’s permission to withdraw the petition. The court examined whether a petition can be withdrawn after settlement. It found no legal impediment to allowing the …

KAPILDEO SINGHversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners were acquitted by the trial court of charges under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 307 and 337 IPC arising from a 1997 incident. The complainant appealed, and the appellate court partially allowed the appeal, overturning the acquittal and remanding the case for sentencing on a …

DOST MOHAMMADversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Dost Mohammad filed a criminal revision challenging a Family Court order that raised his maintenance liability to Rs. 6,300 per month, more than 50% of the court's assessed income of Rs. 12,600. He relied on the Supreme Court's guideline that maintenance should not exceed 25% of a husband's net …

UTTAM RAIversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioners Uttam Rai, Bikram Rai and Bajrang Rai filed a criminal revision petition before the Patna High Court challenging an earlier order. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel sought the Court's permission to withdraw the revision petition. The Court considered whether it could allow …

Bhola Raut @ Bhola Kumar RautversusThe State of Bihar

CONVERTED

The Patna High Court examined the bail denial order of the Children Court against Bhola Raut, a 17‑year‑old accused of offences under the IPC and POCSO Act. The petitioner filed a revision challenging the order, contending that it was an original order and not subject to appellate jurisdiction. The …

Bikash Yadav @ Bikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioners, a group of individuals from Munger and Lakhisarai districts, filed a criminal revision petition challenging the police attachment of their house, which they alleged was beyond the order of the learned I/C Chief Judicial Magistrate dated 28.07.2025. The order of the trial court had …

Jitu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioners Jitu Singh and Karan Singh filed a criminal revision challenging a July 7, 2025 order of the District & Sessions Judge, Supaul, which dismissed their request to mark certain documents as exhibits in a trial arising from Supaul P.S. Case No. 402 of 2021. The documents pertained to …

BHOLA SINGH @ RAKESH KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner Bhola Singh was convicted under Section 325 IPC for causing grievous hurt to the informant's sister during an assault over a property dispute. He appealed the conviction, arguing lack of sufficient evidence, misappreciation of medical testimony, and that a prior complaint case had …

Mangesh Kushwaha @ Ganesh KushwahaversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Mangesh Kushwaha filed a revision petition challenging the Additional Sessions Judge's order rejecting his application under Section 228 of the CrPC for framing a charge under Section 307 of the IPC. The petitioner argued that intention to cause death must be proved and that the trial court had …

Md. Kamal Shah @ Kamal SahversusThe State of Bihar

CONVERTED

The petitioners, members of the family of Md. Kamal Shah, sought a criminal revision of an order of the Additional Sessions Judge who had taken cognizance in an SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) case. The State contended that the revision was not maintainable and that an appeal under Section 14A(2) …

Urmila DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Urmila Devi, the mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, was charged under Section 80(2) read with Section 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for allegedly killing the daughter of an informant over a dowry dispute. The petitioner contended that the allegation was …

Dharamvir Yadav @ Dharamvir RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dharamvir Yadav, applied for bail in a case registered under Section 317(2) of the BNS for allegedly keeping a stolen motorcycle at his residence. The prosecution alleged that a police raid recovered the stolen motorcycle from the petitioner's house, while the petitioner contended …

Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rohit Kumar was arrested in connection with a joy‑firing incident at a marriage during which a person was shot dead. He was charged under Sections 103(1) read with 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 25(1‑b)A, 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act. The petitioner pleaded innocence, arguing that the …

Shivam Kumar @ Shivam Kumar Raj @ Shivam SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shivam Kumar was arrested following a raid that uncovered 260 litres of illicit mahua liquor allegedly being smuggled by train. He was charged under Section 317(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016. The petitioner contended that he had …

Ayush RajversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ayush Raj was arrested in connection with a case involving the alleged riding of a stolen motorcycle and charged under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023. He claimed that he had purchased the motorcycle in good faith, had a clean antecedent, and that the chargesheet had already been filed. The …

Rupesh MandalversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Rupesh Mandal, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition. The Court granted the request, allowing the withdrawal. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive …

Jitendra SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Jitendra Sah was arrested in connection with a case under the NDPS Act for alleged possession of 14.90 grams of a brown sugar-like narcotic substance and a mobile phone. The petitioner claimed false implication, highlighted a record error showing 80 grams instead of the actual 14.90 grams, and …

Ajanish Kumar @ Ajanish Yadav @ Ajnish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ajanish Kumar, was arrested in connection with a robbery alleged under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code, wherein Rs.36,500 was allegedly snatched from an informant. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on a confessional statement and CCTV footage, with no FIR naming the …

Jasiya DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Jasiya Devi was arrested under Sections 8 and 20(b)(II B) of the NDPS Act for allegedly possessing 10.41 kg of ganja, part of a total 31.1 kg seized at Sakri railway station. She contended that no contraband was recovered from her, that her thumb impression was obtained under duress, and that she …

Amarnath Singh @ Amarjit SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Amarnath Singh, sought bail in a murder case (Complaint No. 2598 of 2018) alleging offences under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with co‑accused, killed the complainant's son by running him over with a tractor, while …

Sulo Yadav @ Sholo YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sulo Yadav, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 25(1‑B)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act, alleging that the alleged seizure of a country‑made katta and ten live cartridges from his possession was unfounded and that the police failed to follow the provisions of Section 100 …

Kundan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Kundan Kumar and Deepak Kumar were arrested in connection with a theft alleged under Sections 334(1) and 303(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act, with a charge sheet filed after they had been in custody since 26‑06‑2025. The petitioners claimed they were falsely implicated and …

Adars Kumar @ PurushotamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Adars Kumar, was arrested during a police raid that recovered 1,817.460 liters of illicit liquor, and was charged under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016. He claimed he was merely a labourer attending a village feast, had no ownership or control …

Kanhaiya KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Kanhaiya Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging inducement of marriage, a physical relationship lasting six years, and related offences under Sections 69, 352 and 351(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that the informant’s statement under Section 183 was …

Rupesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rupesh Kumar, was arrested after a police raid recovered a musket, cartridges, and a knife from his residence and that of a co-accused. He applied for bail, claiming innocence, lack of any incriminating material in his personal possession, a clean criminal record, and that the …

Sonam @ Sanam @ Sangeeta DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sonam (also known as Sanam and Sangeeta Devi), was accused in a 2005 case involving serious offences such as murder, attempt to murder, and unlawful assembly, alleged to have taken part in an armed extremist encounter that resulted in a police death. She contended that she was …

Diwakar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Diwakar Kumar was charged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1) and 307 read with Section 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 for an alleged robbery and assault. The prosecution’s case relied on the statement of an apprehended co‑accused who named the petitioner, but no incriminating articles were recovered …

Vikash Kumar Paswan @ Vikash PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vikash Kumar Paswan was arrested as a co‑passenger in a vehicle from which 666 litres of illicit country‑made liquor were seized, alleged to be offences under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act. The petitioner claimed he was neither the driver nor the owner of the vehicle, …

Aditya SagarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Aditya Sagar, was arrested for alleged black‑marketing of fertilizers under Sections 7(i)(a)(ii) of the Essential Commodities Act. He contended that he was implicated only because the fertilizers were found in premises he rented and that he was neither the shop owner nor the driver. …

Munna RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Munna Ram was arrested in connection with an alleged offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act for allegedly keeping 182 litres of illicit Mahua liquor on the banks of the Sone River. The petitioner claimed innocence, asserted that no incriminating material was found in his …

Vijay ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Anuj Kumar and Arvind Kumar were arrested in connection with a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly manufacturing and selling illicit country-made liquor. The prosecution claimed a raid recovered 145 litres of mahua liquor and gas cylinders from …

Sachin Kumar Yadav @ Sachin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sachin Kumar Yadav, was arrested in a raid on allegations of dealing in country‑made and foreign liquor under Sections 274, 275 r/w 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016. Police recovered large quantities of liquor and …

MikkuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mikku was arrested in connection with the transportation of foreign liquor, with 179.25 litres seized from two vehicles and charges under Sections 292 and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 30(a), 32, 41(i) & (ii) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016. He argued that he …

Dharamveer KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dharamveer Kumar, was arrested as a passenger in an auto during a police raid that uncovered 240 litres of illicit foreign liquor, leading to charges under Sections 303(2), 317(2), 317(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, …

Rakesh Kumar @ BhullaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rakesh Kumar was arrested in connection with an Excise case alleging possession of illicit mahua liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016. The prosecution’s secret information led to the seizure of 105 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, but no liquor was found in the …

Pappu PrasadversusThe State Of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Pappu Prasad, a driver, was arrested after his vehicle was intercepted and 350 litres of illicit country-made liquor were seized, leading to charges under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act. The petitioner claimed he was merely the driver, not the owner, and asserted his innocence, …

Lakhan Rai @ Lakhan RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Lakhan Rai was arrested following a police raid that uncovered mobile phones, a knife, illicit liquor and cash, leading to charges under multiple sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, the Arms Act and the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he was falsely …

Kumar Vishoka NandversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kumar Vishoka Nand, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State of Bihar to institute a criminal case based on a written report and to recover his missing son, aged about 25 years. The petitioner later informed the court that his son had returned and he no longer wished to …

Vivek KumarversusPriti Kumari

DISPOSED

Vivek Kumar Tanti was ordered by the Family Court, Munger, to pay a monthly maintenance of Rs.9,000 to his wife, Priti Kumari. He claimed inability to pay and obtained a conditional stay on 09.09.2025, which was later vacated after he failed to make payments. He filed a revision petition challenging …

XXXXversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The revision petition challenged the denial of bail to a 15‑year‑old child in conflict with law (CICL) who was apprehended in a narcotics seizure under the NDPS Act. The petitioner argued that the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 mandates bail unless there are reasonable …

Duni Lal YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, four brothers, filed a petition seeking restoration of Civil Miscellaneous Case No.1958 of 2017, which had been dismissed for non‑prosecution on 4 August 2025. They explained that the dismissal resulted from an inadvertent omission on their part. The learned counsel for the …

IMBESAT SHAUKATversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Imbesat Shaukat filed a criminal writ petition in the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and several officials, primarily challenging actions of the Station House Officer (respondent No.6) who had since died. The petitioner’s counsel sought to remove the deceased respondent’s name from the …

Ajay Prasad, AdvocateversusThe Registrar General High Court,

DISPOSED

The petitioner filed a contempt petition alleging that the executing court failed to dispose of Execution Case No.236 of 2023 despite Supreme Court guidelines. The High Court examined a communication from the Civil Judge (Senior Division)-9, Patna, explaining that the delay was due to multiple …

M/S SHYAM AGENCIES TRHOUGH ITS PROPRIETOR RAJESH KUMAR BHAGATversusThe State of Bihar through the Director General of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna.

DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION

M/S Shyam Agencies, represented by its proprietor Rajesh Kumar Bhagat, filed a criminal writ petition before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar, several police officials and a private respondent. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, and the petitioner’s counsel sought an …

RAJU KAZIversusNIRA DEVI

CONVERTED

Petitioner Raju Kazi filed a criminal writ jurisdiction petition against his wife Nira Devi. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to convert the writ petition into a criminal revision petition. The Court examined the request and found no impediment to the conversion. Accordingly, the Court …

SHAMBHUSARAN DUBEYversusThe State of Bihar through S.P. Aurangabad (Bihar).

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three members of the Dubey family, filed a writ petition seeking quash of FIR No. 120 of 2018 registered at Goh Police Station, alleging that the FIR was filed contrary to Supreme Court guidelines in Priyanka Srivastava & Anr. v. State of U.P. However, the investigating agency …

Nathuni PaswanversusSatya Narayan Paswan

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Nathuni Paswan and Shambhu Paswan, filed a petition before the Patna High Court seeking restoration of Civil Miscellaneous Case No.1310 of 2018, which had been dismissed for non‑prosecution on 9 January 2025. They explained that the dismissal resulted from an inadvertent omission on …

Ishwar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Ishwar Yadav, filed an application seeking restoration of Criminal Revision No. 439 of 2022, which had been dismissed on 13 October 2025 for failure to comply with a peremptory order dated 2 September 2025. The petition argued that the dismissal was premature and that the revision …

Vikram KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vikram Kumar was charged with murdering his wife and shooting at his paramour under Sections 109 and 103(1) of the BNS and several provisions of the Arms Act. He had been in custody since February 2025 and his earlier bail application was rejected. The petitioner argued that the key witnesses had …

Ram Lakhan MehtaversusTuleshwar Mahto

ALLOWED

The petitioners, a group of brothers named Mehta, filed a petition in the Patna High Court seeking restoration of Civil Miscellaneous Case No. 1707 of 2018, which had been dismissed for non‑prosecution on 30 September 2024. They explained that the dismissal was due to an inadvertent omission on …

Md. Abdullhah @ Md. AbdullahversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Md. Abdullah, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court. The petition sought relief against the State of Bihar. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Raj Kishor Prasad, requested permission to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the …