Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
807 judgments · newest first · showing 401–600
The petitioner, Bipul Kumar, was arrested in connection with a cyber‑fraud case (Cyber P.S. Case No. 51 of 2024) alleging receipt of Rs 3,99,000 and charged under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and Sections 66/66(D) of the Information Technology Act. He was not named in the …
The petitioners, Usha Devi and Sanjay Yadav, were named in an FIR for alleged offences under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act and Section 8/20(B)(ii) of the NDPS Act, based on the recovery of 240 g of ganja, 49.68 L of foreign liquor and 55 L of country liquor from a public laboratory. They contended …
Mahesh Singh was arrested in connection with a land‑dispute‑related assault alleged to have been committed with a sharp‑edged axe, attracting charges under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504 read with 34 of the IPC. He has been in custody since 14 May 2025. The petitioner contended that the incident …
Bulbul Singh was arrested in May 2025 for alleged possession of 3.575 kg of ganja under Sections 20(b)(ii)(c) and 29 of the NDPS Act. He contended that the contraband was recovered from co‑accused and not from his conscious physical possession, noting that the auto he was travelling in was occupied …
The petitioner, Dilip Sharma, was arrested in a POCSO case for allegedly capturing a video of the rape of a 16‑year‑old girl, while the actual rape was alleged against a co‑accused who had already been granted bail. The petitioner argued that the charge against him is limited to video recording, …
Damodar Yadav was arrested in connection with a murder case registered under Sections 103(1), 61(2) and 3(5) of the BNS. The FIR was based solely on the informant’s suspicion that the petitioner and his wife intended to kill the informant’s husband, and the informant was not an eye‑witness. The …
Somu Kumar was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 8A(c), 21(c) and 29 of the NDPS Act after police recovered 419.8 grams of brown sugar from beneath the seat of a Swift Dezire car he was travelling in. The petitioner argued that the narcotic was not in his conscious physical …
Laddu Paswan applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 302, 201 read with 34 of the IPC for the alleged murder of an informant's husband, stemming from a dispute over illicit liquor trade. The petitioner has been in custody since July 16, 2025, and the prosecution alleges his active …
The petitioner, Suraj Kumar, was arrested in connection with a robbery of jewellery from Jiva Jewellery Shop and charged under Sections 310(2) and 317(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. Although his name does not appear in the FIR, the prosecution relied on CCTV footage and a recorded …
The petitioners, three residents of Baghmara, sought bail in a case (Manihari P.S. Case No.297 of 2024) involving offences under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR alleged that nine accused, including the petitioners, attacked an informant’s family, damaged property worth …
Santosh Yadav was arrested in connection with Dinara Police Station Case No.146 of 2024 for alleged assault using a lathi, alleged to be with intent to cause death, under IPC sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 307, 504, 506 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for bail, arguing that the incident was …
The petitioners Prince Kumar and Gaurav Kumar were arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 103, 61(2) and 3(5) of the BNS for an alleged firing incident. They were not named in the FIR and have been in custody since 16 July 2025. The prosecution’s case against them is based …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar Yadav, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Sections 103 and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act) after a FIR alleged that he and others opened fire on the informant's father, causing his death. The informant, who is the …
Rohit Kumar, alias Lalu, was arrested in connection with a robbery of jewellery and has been in custody since 20 May 2025, although his name does not appear in the FIR. The only link to him is a confessional statement made by co‑accused Suraj Kumar, and no other incriminating material has been …
Petitioner Raushan Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he, along with co‑accused, abused minor girls by using vulgar language, threatening them, and attempting to disrobe them. He has been in custody since 23 June 2025 and faces charges under several sections of the BNSS and …
Ashik Kumar filed an anticipatory bail petition before the Patna High Court in connection with a criminal case (PS Case No. 442 of 2024). After short arguments, the petitioner’s counsel sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the petition. The issue before the Court was whether the petitioner …
Raja Babu, the petitioner, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 310(3) and 317(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that he was not named in the FIR but was implicated only through confessional statements of co‑accused persons. He had been in custody since 4 …
The petitioner, Md. Mojahid, sought anticipatory bail after being named in an FIR for allegedly shooting the brother of an informant in a land dispute. The FIR listed offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act, with additional charges added later. The petitioner argued that he …
Krishna Yadav was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 143(1), 76 and 3(5) of the IPC, Section 8 of the POCSO Act and Sections 75 and 79 of the Juvenile Justice Act, alleging trafficking of several girls. He has been in custody since 20 March 2025. The petitioner argued that …
The petitioner, Md Shambhu Alam, was arrested during a police raid of a red‑light area in Purnea and charged under multiple statutes including the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, the POCSO Act, the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act and the SC/ST …
The petitioner, Sintu Kumar Yadav, was arrested in connection with a murder case (PS Case No.332 of 2025) where the FIR named him only on the basis of a call detail record and not by any overt act. The FIR alleged offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act, but the substantive …
Chandan Kumar was arrested in connection with a theft of a Scorpio vehicle and charged under Section 309(6) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita. He was not named in the FIR; his name emerged only from a co‑accused's confessional statement. The prosecution alleged he knowingly purchased the stolen vehicle, …
The Patna High Court entertained two successive bail petitions filed by Dhananjay Singh and Jitendra Kumar, both arrested in connection with a FIR dated 25‑08‑2023 alleging indiscriminate firing that resulted in the death of the informant’s son. The petitioners had been in custody for about two and …
The petitioner, Parambir Kumar, was arrested in connection with a robbery of jewellery from Jiva Jewellery Shop and has been in custody since 3 September 2025. He is charged under Sections 310(2) and 317(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, but his name does not appear in the FIR; the only link is a …
Mukesh Singh was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 8 and 20(B)(ii)(c) of the NDPS Act for allegedly possessing 159.33 kg of ganja. He contended that the contraband was found in another vehicle and that the charge‑sheet filed against him was incomplete, lacking a forensic laboratory …
Ghanshyam Sah was arrested in connection with a murder case (Puraini P.S. Case No. 228 of 2024) alleged under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The informant, the son of the deceased, claimed the petitioner killed his father over business enmity. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Rashid Jamal, was arrested on 3 March 2025 in connection with a case of supplying counterfeit Indian and Nepali currency, alleged under Sections 179, 180 and 3(5) of the BNS. The FIR alleged that the counterfeit money was found in the possession of a co‑accused, Md. Tahir, and that …
The petitioners, Brahmdeo Mandal and Rintu Mandal, were arrested in connection with a violent incident arising from a land dispute, wherein a group of nine accused damaged property and a co-accused allegedly caused the death of the informant's father‑in‑law. The FIR charges the petitioners under …
The petitioner, Sanjay Bhagat, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137 and 140(3) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and has been in custody since 23 January 2025. The FIR alleges that the informant's son was summoned by co‑accused persons and later went missing, with a threat of …
The petitioners, four residents of Barith village, were arrested in connection with a cyber‑fraud case (Giriyak P.S. Case No. 336 of 2025) and have been in custody since 30 July 2025. They were charged under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, including sections 318(4), 319(2), …
The petitioner, Sanjay Bhagat, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137 and 140(3) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and has been in custody since 23 January 2025. The FIR alleges that the informant's son was summoned by co‑accused persons and later went missing, with a threat of …
The petitioner, Sanjay Bhagat, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137 and 140(3) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and has been in custody since 23 January 2025. The FIR alleges that the informant's son was summoned by co‑accused persons and later went missing, with a threat of …
The petitioner, Piyush Paswan, applied for bail in a murder case (Magadh University PS Case No.142 of 2024) where the FIR named three unknown assailants and the petitioner was not originally listed. His name surfaced only through a confessional statement of a co-accused, and no physical evidence …
Mahboob Alam was arrested during a police raid in a red‑light area of Purnea and charged under multiple provisions of the Bihar Police Act, the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, the POCSO Act, the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. He applied for …
The Patna High Court considered bail applications of three petitioners accused of dacoity under Sections 310(2) and 311 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. None of the petitioners were named in the FIR; their alleged involvement stemmed solely from the confessional statements of a co-accused who …
The Patna High Court considered bail applications filed by four accused persons—Manish Kumar, Rohit Kumar, Anand Kumar, and Rajkrit Kumar—arising from a cyber‑fraud case (Motihari Cyber P.S. Case No. 139 of 2025) involving offences under the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology …
The Patna High Court considered bail applications filed by four accused persons—Mantu Kumar, Rahul Paswan, Raju Kumar and Anchal Kumar—who were arrested in connection with a Giriyak police case alleging cyber fraud and related offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Information …
The petitioner, Rikku Yadav, sought bail for offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act relating to a shooting that allegedly killed the brother of an informant. Although the FIR does not name him, the prosecution linked him to the crime through a call detail record and a …
Akhilesh Kumar, who was not named in the FIR, was arrested in connection with a shooting that resulted in the death of an informant's brother. He sought bail for offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act, alleging that the only link to him was a call detail record while the …
The Patna High Court considered four bail applications filed by Manish Kumar, Rohit Kumar, Anand Kumar and Rajkrit Kumar in connection with a cyber‑fraud case (Motihari Cyber P.S. Case No. 139 of 2025) involving offences under the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act. The …
The petitioner, Ravi Ranjan Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 310(3), 317(5) of the B.N.S and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that he was not named in the FIR and had been in custody since 20 May 2025. The prosecution’s case relied solely on confessional statements of …
The High Court considered two bail applications filed by Kheshari Khan and Rajesh Kumar Gupta in connection with a theft case (Hisua P.S. Case No. 30 of 2025) involving alleged theft of silver ornaments. Both petitioners were not named in the FIR and were arrested based on confessional statements of …
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, was named in an FIR alleging offences under the IPC, POCSO Act and Juvenile Justice Act for allegedly trafficking several girls, both minors and adults, for immoral activities. The petitioner contended that the girls were with his wife’s orchestra for a stage …
The Patna High Court considered four bail applications filed by Manish Kumar, Rohit Kumar, Anand Kumar and Rajkrit Kumar in connection with a cyber‑fraud case (Motihari Cyber P.S. Case No. 139 of 2025) involving offences under the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act. The …
Amit Bind filed a regular bail petition before the Patna High Court. While the petition was pending, the petitioner was acquitted of the charges against him. The petitioner’s counsel then moved the court to withdraw the bail petition on the ground that it had become infructuous. The court examined …
The petitioners, four residents of Barith village, were arrested in connection with a cyber‑fraud case (Giriyak P.S. Case No. 336 of 2025) and have been in custody since 30 July 2025. They were charged under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, including sections 318(4), 319(2), …
The Patna High Court considered bail applications filed by four accused persons—Mantu Kumar, Rahul Paswan, Raju Kumar and Anchal Kumar—who were arrested in connection with a Giriyak police case alleging cyber fraud and related offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Information …
The petitioner, Md. Wasim Khan, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 310(3) and 317(5) of the B.N.S and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that he was not named in the FIR and had been in custody since 28‑02‑2025. The only link to the petitioner was a confessional statement made by …
Chhote Lal Singh was arrested in connection with an assault that led to the death of an informant's mother and has been in custody since August 7, 2025. He sought bail, arguing that the fatal assault was committed by co‑accused Ravi Kumar and Jaiprakash Kumar, that similar co‑accused had already …
The petitioner, Piyush Paswan, applied for bail in a murder case (Magadh University PS Case No.142 of 2024) where the FIR named three unknown assailants and the petitioner was not originally listed. His name surfaced only through a confessional statement of a co-accused, and no physical evidence …
The petitioner, Sanjay Bhagat, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137 and 140(3) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and has been in custody since 23 January 2025. The FIR alleges that the informant's son was summoned by co‑accused persons and that the petitioner may have been …
Vikash Kumar was arrested in connection with a theft of a Scorpio vehicle and has been in custody since 25‑06‑2025, although his name does not appear in the FIR. The prosecution’s case is based mainly on a confessional statement of a co‑accused, Amit Kumar, and there is no evidence that Vikash knew …
The Patna High Court considered three bail applications filed by Tanveer Shekh, Gulab Nadaf and Riyaz @ Vishal, all accused in a dacoity case (Jalley P.S. Case No. 222 of 2024) under Sections 310(2) and 311 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. None of the petitioners were named in the FIR; their …
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar Pandey, was arrested in connection with a robbery of jewellery from Jiva Jewellery Shop, alleged under Sections 310(2) and 317(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He is not named in the FIR and his alleged involvement rests solely on a confessional statement of co‑accused …
The Patna High Court considered bail applications filed by three petitioners—Tanveer Shekh, Gulab Nadaf, and Riyaz (Vishal)—who were implicated in a dacoity case (Jalley P.S. Case No. 222 of 2024) under Sections 310(2) and 311 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. None of the petitioners were named …
The Patna High Court entertained two successive bail petitions filed by Dhananjay Singh and Jitendra Kumar, both arrested in connection with a FIR dated 25‑08‑2023 alleging indiscriminate firing that resulted in the death of the informant’s son. The petitioners had been in custody for about two and …
The petitioner, Luso Yadav, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Sections 302, 120B, 34 IPC) and has been in custody since July 10, 2025. He contended that the fatal firearm injury was actually caused by co‑accused Pinku Yadav and that the bullet could not have been fired by him. The …
Mukesh Kumar filed a petition seeking modification of an earlier order in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from PS case No. 738 of 2017. The petition was filed against the State of Bihar and Rakesh Maini. Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, argued for interference with the …
The petitioner, Sanjeev Kumar, filed an application seeking restoration of Criminal Miscellaneous No.14843 of 2025, which had been dismissed on 12 January 2026 for want of prosecution. He contended that the failure to appear before the court was neither intentional nor deliberate. The court examined …
Sonu Singh applied for bail in a kidnapping‑for‑ransom case (Sections 364‑A and 34 IPC) where he was not named in the FIR but was implicated through a confessional statement of a co‑accused. He had been in custody since 5 March 2025 and no incriminating material was recovered from him; the victim’s …
Ankesh Kumar was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 8, 20(b)II(C), 25 and 29 of the NDPS Act for allegedly possessing 10.90 kg of charas. He has been in custody since 15 September 2024. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the informant who lodged the FIR was later caught taking …
The petitioners filed regular bail applications in two criminal miscellaneous cases arising from a 2022 police report. The trial was at a late stage, with only one prosecution witness, Dr. Subodh Kumar, yet to be examined. The Patna High Court, after hearing the parties, held that the bail petitions …
Vivek Kumar was arrested in connection with a dacoity alleged under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code, involving theft of gold, silver ornaments and cash, and firearm injuries. He was not named in the FIR and has been in custody since 12‑08‑2024, with the prosecution’s case relying solely on a …
The petitioner, Sahil Alam, applied for bail in a theft case registered as Chandi P.S. Case No.23 of 2025, alleging offences under Sections 334(1) and 303(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He was not named in the FIR and has been in custody since 12‑02‑2025. The allegation against him stems …
Satya Prakash Mahto petitioned for bail in a case registered under Section 103(1)/3(5) of the Bihar Non-Compulsory Statutes (BNS) and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that he was not named in the FIR and has been in custody since 29 January 2025. The only link to him was a confessional statement …
The petitioner, Md. Meraz, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court arising from a police case. The petitioner, through counsel Mrs. Nidhi Anand, sought the court's permission to withdraw the pending application. The court considered the request and found no objection to …
The petitioner, Rajnish Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail petition in the High Court of Patna. He later sought permission to withdraw the petition, citing a prior order (Cr. Misc. No. 40976 of 2025) that stayed further proceedings against him before the trial court. The petitioner argued that there …
The petitioner, Pravesh Sahani, was arrested in connection with a murder case (IPC Sections 302 and 34) arising from an altercation on 16‑03‑2024 that led to the death of the informant’s son. The FIR attributes the fatal assault solely to co‑accused Babloo Sahani, while the petitioner was present …
Parmod Kumar, the petitioner, was arrested in connection with a rape case (PS Sindhugarh Case No.75 of 2025) where the victim, a 17‑year‑old girl, was allegedly assaulted by a co‑accused and the act was video‑recorded by another co‑accused and the petitioner. The petitioner, who is the victim's …
Poonam Devi, the petitioner, was arrested in connection with a FIR alleging assault on the informant's son and other family members, causing bodily injuries. The FIR lists offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 74, 352, 351(2) read with 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. The petitioner, a …
Aman Kumar applied for bail in a case registered as Sarai P.S. Case No.176 of 2024 under Section 317 read with 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He was not named in the FIR but was implicated through a confessional statement of co‑accused Neeraj Kumar and has been in custody since …
The petitioner, Sanjay Chaudhary, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Sections 302 and 34 IPC) and has been in custody since 7 April 2022. He alleged that the informant who lodged the FIR was not an eye‑witness and that the complaint was motivated by a family property dispute, as the …
The petitioner, Sajan Kumar, was arrested in connection with a rape case where a video of the alleged offence was recorded by co‑accused Binod Kumar and the petitioner. The victim, a 17‑year‑old, gave a statement under Section 183 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNSS) that, according to the …
The petitioner, Ajit Mahto, was arrested in connection with a robbery alleged to have taken place at a jewelry shop, charged under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He was not named in the FIR and has been in custody since 18 June 2025. The sole basis for the …
Ankit Kumar was arrested in connection with a kidnapping and alleged murder under Sections 364 and 120B of the IPC. He sought bail, contending that his name appeared only through a co‑accused's confessional statement and that the victim did not identify him, with no other incriminating material. The …
Ram Bhola Kumar petitioned for bail in a robbery case registered under Section 309 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He was not named in the FIR and has been in custody since 7 July 2025. The sole allegation against him stems from a confessional statement of …
The petitioner, Shashi Ranjan, was arrested in connection with a bank dacoity and the murder of two constables, alleged under IPC Section 396 and Arms Act Section 27. He was not named in the FIR; his name emerged from a co-accused's confessional statement, and no incriminating material directly …
Vinod Yadav was arrested in connection with a murder case (Sursand P.S. Case No.451 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 302, 363, 201 and 120‑B read with 34 of the IPC. He has been in custody since 22‑04‑2025. The police later submitted a closure report against him, stating that no …
Rupesh Kumar, the appellant, applied for bail for the third time after two earlier bail pleas were rejected in earlier criminal appeals. The case originates from a 2023 police report in Bhagalpur and is currently at the trial court, which is nearing the conclusion of the trial. The appellant argued …
The petitioners, Suryadeo Paswan, Vicky Paswan and Alakh Paswan, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No.81839 of 2025 arising from PS Case No.-44 Year-2025 before the Patna High Court. They appeared before the Hon’ble Justice Chandra Shekhar Jha seeking to withdraw the petition. The court heard …
Rakesh Kumar was arrested in connection with a murder case (PS Case No. 22 of 2025) under Section 103(1)/3(5) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act, although his name does not appear in the FIR. He has been in custody since 21‑08‑2025. The prosecution’s case against him rests solely on a …
The petitioner, Shiv Ram Bhagat, filed a petition seeking modification of an earlier order dated 25 June 2024, which had permitted the withdrawal of his earlier petition and dismissed the application as withdrawn. The petitioner argued for a change to that order, while the State, represented by an …
Petitioner Kundan Kumar filed a modification petition seeking an extension of time to surrender and furnish a bail bond after being granted bail in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 54513 of 2025. The petitioner claimed personal hardship prevented filing the bail bond within the original deadline. The …
The petitioner, Ajeet Kumar, was named in an FIR under Section 309(4) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly threatening an informant with a pistol and stealing Rs.72,875 along with other valuables. He contended that his inclusion resulted solely from the confessional statement of co‑accused …
The petitioner, Shivam Vishwakarma, was implicated in a murder case (PS Case No. 33 of 2024) for allegedly supplying a country‑made pistol and live cartridge to co‑accused Gulshan Yadav, who later confessed to the murder. The petitioner argued that the informant was not an eye‑witness and that the …
The petitioner, Md. Javir Shekh, was named in an FIR (Kudhani P.S. Case No. 163 of 2022) for multiple offences including an alleged attempt to commit rape and causing grievous injury to the informant's husband. The petitioner contended that the allegations were false, arising from a property …
Satish Kumar (Satish Yadav) was named in an FIR for alleged mental and physical cruelty under Sections 498‑A/34 of the IPC and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, stemming from a dowry demand for land and a car. The FIR was lodged 15 days after the alleged incident, and the petitioner’s counsel …
The petitioner, Tajman Ray, was arrested in connection with a case (Turkauliya P.S. Case No. 1080 of 2022) alleging offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 308, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code for assaulting an informant and his son. The petitioner contended that the incident was a "free …
The petitioners, eight residents of Pakadhi village, were named in an FIR for multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code and the POCSO Act, alleged to have assaulted the husband of an informant, causing his death, and to have outraged the modesty of the informant's daughter. The defence argued …
Bina Kumari, a middle school teacher, was named in an FIR for alleged forgery of her matriculation certificate and mark‑sheet to obtain a government teaching post, facing charges under IPC sections 420, 120B, 467, 468 and 471. She contended that the original documents were genuine, that she had lost …
The petitioner, Ramesh Sahni, was implicated in a FIR alleging kidnapping of a 14‑year‑old girl and alleged illicit intercourse/marriage under Sections 363, 366A of the IPC and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 164 CrPC stated that she married the petitioner …
The petitioner, Nepali Pandit, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Suryagarha P.S. Case No. 149 of 2019) under IPC sections 302/34 and Arms Act section 27. He sought bail, arguing that the FIR lacked an eye‑witness and was based merely on prior enmity, and that the police had submitted a …
The petitioners, Sanjay Mahto and Chhotu Mahto, were named in an FIR for alleged murder of an informant's husband, originally under Sections 363, 120‑B and 34 of the IPC, later amended to include Sections 302 and 201. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners administered intoxicating liquor and …
Vikesh Kumar Singh was arrested in connection with a FIR alleging mental and physical cruelty and dowry harassment under IPC sections 341, 323, 498A, 504, 506, 34 and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner contended that the allegations were vague, the FIR was lodged two months after …
The petitioners, nine members of the Ansari family, were accused in Forbesganj P.S. Case No. 394 of 2024 of murdering the husband of an informant, allegedly by a group assault involving lathis and fists. The prosecution charged them under multiple IPC sections including 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 302, …
Vikram Kumar was named in a complaint (No. 1033C/2023) alleging offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 328, 379, 504, 498A and a provision of the Dowry Prohibition Act for alleged mental and physical cruelty linked to a dowry demand for a four‑wheeler. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the …
The petitioner, Anil Choudhary, sought bail in connection with a complaint (No. 1666/2023) alleging offences under several IPC sections and the Dowry Prohibition Act, based on alleged mental and physical cruelty for a dowry demand. Counsel for the petitioner argued that the complaint was not …
Vikash Kumar Singh was arrested in connection with a complaint alleging offences under IPC sections 323, 498A, 379, 34 and the Dowry Prohibition Act for mental and physical cruelty linked to a dowry demand for land. The petitioner argued that the complaint lacked a supporting affidavit and contained …
The petitioners, Manju Devi, Vikash Prasad and Ravi Raushan Kumar, were arrested in connection with a rape case (Sugauli PS Case No. 196 of 2024) alleging that the complainant, a married woman, was deceived into a sexual relationship under a false promise of marriage. The petitioners sought …
The petitioner, Bharat Paswan, was named in an FIR for offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 354‑B, 504/34 and Section 8 of the POCSO Act, alleged to have outraged the modesty of a minor girl and touched her cheek. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the informant, who resides with her maternal …
The petitioners, Ravindra Kumar Jaiswal and his wife Sinku Jaiswal, were named in a 2019 complaint alleging cheating under IPC sections 323, 406, 420, 504 and 34 for receiving Rs.1 lakh and failing to deliver goods. They contended that the dispute was essentially civil and that the criminal …
The petitioner, Pawan Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case alleging an attempt to rape a 17‑year‑old girl, with charges under Sections 341, 323, 354‑A, 354‑B, 504/34 of the IPC and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. The petitioner contended that the FIR was false, arising from a land‑mortgage …
The petitioner, Jayaullah, was named in an FIR for a multitude of offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act, relating to an alleged assault during a land‑dispute incident. The FIR alleged that he, along with co‑accused, used lathis and iron rods causing injuries, with an alleged …
The petitioners, Prwin Kumar Singh and Chao Shen, were named in an FIR for alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B and 34 of the IPC, accused of cheating an informant by forging a stamp‑paper agreement for the supply of mobile handsets. They contended that they had supplied handsets …
Four brothers were arrested in connection with a case of alleged possession and illegal trade of 750 ml of foreign liquor, charged under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 30(a) and 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act. The petitioners applied for …
The petitioners, four brothers, were named in an FIR for alleged forgery of a sale deed, extortion and other offences under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code. They contended that the matter was essentially a civil land dispute, as the land belonged to their grandfather, and that the alleged …
The petitioner, Jata Shanakar Yadav, was named in a complaint alleging mental and physical cruelty under Sections 498-A, 323, 436, 307 and 326 of the IPC following the birth of a female child. The petitioner contended that the dispute had been settled by the local panchayat and that the complainant …
The petitioner filed a second anticipatory bail petition after his earlier application was rejected, alleging no change in circumstances. The court noted that the earlier petition had been dismissed because proceedings under Sections 82 and 83 of the Criminal Procedure Code were already underway. …
The petitioner, Swami Nath Yadav, was named in an FIR for offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 324, 498A, 34 and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging mental and physical cruelty and assault with a sharp-edged weapon. The defence argued that the allegations of cruelty were vague and that …
The petitioner, Halchal Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court. During the hearing on 4 February 2026, his counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition. The court granted the request, allowing the withdrawal. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as …
The petitioner, Anita Devi, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition (No.16574 of 2025) in the High Court of Patna arising out of a police case from East Champaran. On 3 February 2026, counsel for the petitioner sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The Hon’ble Justice Chandra …
The petitioner, Akshaya Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court. During the hearing on 3 February 2026, counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition. The Court granted the request, allowing the withdrawal. Consequently, the petition was …
The petitioner, Bulbul Yadav, was charged under Section 109(1) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing a weapon that injured Dayanand Yadav and informant Mithilesh Kumar on 20 January 2025. The petitioner contended that the injuries were not caused by a …
The petitioner, Md. Mustaque Ahmad, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The sole issue before the Court was whether the petition could be withdrawn at the petitioner's …
The petitioner, Vikash Sharma, filed an anticipatory bail petition in the High Court of Patna after a FIR was lodged against him. During arguments, the Court noted that the proceedings in the underlying criminal case (Cr. Misc. No. 88615 of 2024) had already been stayed by an order dated 19.02.2025. …
The petitioners—Sanju Devi, Rakhi Devi and Jhalendra Prasad—were named in an FIR for alleged assault, mental and physical cruelty, and dowry harassment under IPC sections 498‑A and 365 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The FIR also alleged that the informant’s daughter went missing after the alleged …
The petitioners, Rajesh Kumar and co‑accused, were named in a complaint (Case No. 255(C) of 2020) alleging offences under Section 498A of the IPC for alleged mental and physical cruelty linked to a dowry demand. The petitioner contended that no dowry was demanded and that the allegation was …
The petitioner, Sunny Kumar, was named in an FIR for offences under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC relating to a death that occurred on 13-12-2023. He contended that the incident was an accident caused by a bus rear wheel and sought anticipatory bail, asserting a clean antecedent. The State opposed …
The petitioner, Niraj Kumar, was named in a complaint alleging offences under IPC Sections 323 and 498A and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for alleged mental and physical cruelty and dowry demands. The complaint was filed six months after the alleged incident and was not supported by an …
The petitioner, Saroj Kumar Roy, was named in a complaint alleging mental and physical cruelty under Section 498A of the IPC and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for allegedly demanding Rs. 2 lakh as dowry. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail, arguing that the complaint was vague, omnibus, …
The petitioner, Ashique Alam, was named in a 2019 complaint alleging offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 498A and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act, including mental and physical cruelty and a threat of a second marriage over dowry. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that the …
Rajan Kumar Sharma was named in a 2020 complaint alleging cruelty and dowry harassment under IPC sections 498‑A, 323, 341 and 506. He contended that his wife habitually files false criminal cases and that an earlier police case (Bodh‑Gaya PS Case No.398 of 2020) was closed with a closure report. The …
The petitioner, Santosh Kumar Sharma, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with Complaint No. 829 of 2019 alleging offences under several IPC sections and the Dowry Prohibition Act, based on accusations of mental and physical cruelty for a dowry demand of Rs. 2.5 lakh. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Parvej Alam, was named in an FIR for offences under Sections 341, 323, 376, 504, 34 of the IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act, alleging a physical relationship with the minor daughter of the informant under a false pretext of marriage. The petitioner contended that the …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar, was implicated in a fraud case (Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 750 of 2023) alleging cheating of Rs. 14,77,169 deposited with Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance. He contended that the alleged illegal withdrawal was executed using his desktop computer by co‑accused colleagues, not …
Rabindra Yadav was named in an FIR for alleged physical and mental cruelty under Sections 498-A, 341, 504, 506, 34 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, stemming from a demand for Rs.2 lakh and a Bolero vehicle. The petitioner argued that the cruelty allegations were vague, …
The petitioner, Shaurabh Thakur, was named in an FIR for offences under Sections 363 and 302/34 IPC relating to a missing woman. He argued that only suspicion linked him to the crime, noting that the informant was not an eye‑witness and that the primary allegation rested on his father, Karelal …
The petitioner, Md. Yeshan, a driver employed by St. Paul School, was named in an FIR for alleged theft of a Bolero Jeep (registration BR-31PA-7513) under IPC sections 379 and 420. He claimed the vehicle was on hire to the school and that he had promptly reported the theft to the police, but no FIR …
The petitioner, Pramod Mahto, was charged under Section 498A of the IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for alleged mental and physical cruelty and dowry demands. The complaint was filed after eleven years of marriage and was not supported by an affidavit, which the petitioner’s counsel …
The petitioner, Shyam Sundar Chaudhary, was named in a complaint (Case No. 600 of 2023) alleging offences under IPC sections 498A, 323, 406, 504 and 506 for alleged mental and physical cruelty linked to a dowry demand of a motorcycle. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail, arguing that the …
The petitioner, Pradip Kumar, was named in an FIR (Gopalpur PS Case No. 58 of 2024) for offences under Sections 363, 302/34 of the IPC relating to the disappearance of an informant’s wife. The petitioner contended that, apart from a familial link to the main accused Karelal Thakur, there was no …
The petitioner, Savitri Devi, sought bail in a criminal case (PS Case No. 219 of 2023) where she was accused of assault and other offences arising from a land dispute. The FIR alleged that she, along with co‑accused, assaulted the informant during a land measurement, with the land having been …
The petitioner, Bhawesh Kumar Jha, a class‑4 employee (peon) of Punjab National Bank, was named in an FIR for alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 409, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code relating to the defalcation of Rs 7,81,643 and the withdrawal of Rs 1,60,000 from a deceased …
The petitioner, Aditya Kishore, was arrested in Mahila Police Station Case No.19 of 2023 on charges of mental and physical cruelty and dowry harassment under various IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act sections. He filed a bail petition, contending that the allegations were vague and that he and the …
The petitioners, four fathers from Chhota Jhauan, were named in an FIR for alleged murder (IPC §§302, 201 & 34) of the daughter of petitioner No.1. They contended that the FIR was false, filed out of personal enmity with the informant whose grandson had previously been imprisoned. The informant was …
Manju Devi was named in a complaint (Case No. 1564C of 2019) alleging that she failed to return a Rs. 2 lakh loan and issued a dishonoured cheque, leading to a charge under Section 406 of the IPC for criminal breach of trust. The petitioner argued that the dispute was essentially civil, concerning …
The petitioner, Chuman Choudhary, was named in a complaint alleging mental and physical cruelty under IPC sections 323, 341, 498‑A, 504 and 506/34 for non‑fulfilment of a dowry demand. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the complaint was false, fabricated, and not supported by an affidavit, citing …
Amiruddin was named in a complaint alleging mental and physical cruelty, and dowry demands, leading to charges under IPC sections 323, 341, 379 and 498‑A. The petitioner contended that the allegations were false, fabricated and overly general, citing the precedent of Priyanka Srivastava v. State of …
The petitioner, Tej Narayan Singh, was named in an FIR for alleged offences under Sections 409 and 420 of the IPC and Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, based on a claim that rice and wheat recorded in an e‑POS system were missing on physical inspection, suggesting a black‑market sale. The …
Maneer Ansari and family filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners sought permission to withdraw the petition. The court considered the request and, finding no impediment, allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the petition …
The petitioner, Umesh Gop, filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the application. The Court, exercising its inherent jurisdiction, allowed the withdrawal request. Consequently, …
Divyalata filed a petition before the Patna High Court seeking relief, but was arrested while the petition was pending. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the arrest rendered the petition infructuous and requested its withdrawal. The court considered whether a petition that has become infructuous …
Guddu Kumar Sharma, the petitioner, was not named in the FIR but was implicated through a co-accused's confessional statement in a theft and vehicle‑tampering case (IPC §§420, 406, 379, 467, 468, 411/34). He claimed he merely rented a garage from Pintu Singh/Chandramani Ray and had no documentary …
The petitioners, Rajkumar Ram and Sanjiv Kumar Tulsyan, were arrested in connection with a 2016 police case alleging forgery and cheating related to a piece of land. They contended that the core dispute was a civil land matter, already before the District Magistrate and the Bihar Land Tribunal, and …
Rajesh Prasad and Shobha Devi, parents of co‑accused Nikash Kumar, were implicated in a kidnapping case (Baniyapur P.S. Case No. 13 of 2024) involving the alleged abduction of a 17‑year‑old girl for illicit intercourse or marriage. The petitioners sought bail, contending that the allegations against …
The petitioner, Anil Kumar, was named in a 2018 complaint alleging offences under IPC sections 420 and 406 and NI Act section 138 for a dishonoured cheque of Rs. 4 lakh related to a land sale. The petitioner argued that the dispute was essentially civil, that the sale consideration had already been …
Manjoor Khaliffa was named in an FIR alleging that three minor girls – two his daughters and a maid – were forced into immoral traffic. The raid was conducted on a tip from an NGO, but the girls’ statements under Section 164 of the CrPC indicated they were apprehended without cause. No substantive …
The petitioner, Shakil Khan, was named in an FIR for offences under Section 498A of the IPC and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleged to have subjected the complainant to mental and physical cruelty for not meeting a dowry demand of a motorcycle. The petitioner’s counsel argued that both …
Dadan Singh, the petitioner, was named in a 2020 complaint (No. 2268(C)) alleging offences under IPC sections 498A, 323, 341, 506 and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, primarily for alleged mental and physical cruelty linked to a cash demand for land purchase. The petitioner had previously …
The petitioner, Ashif, was named in a complaint (Araria Complaint Case No. 431C of 2021) alleging cruelty and dowry harassment under Section 498A of the IPC. The petitioner claimed that the dispute was resolved through mediation on 20 March 2025, with both parties agreeing to continue their married …
The petitioners, family members of the accused, were named in an FIR for alleged kidnapping of a 14‑year‑old girl under Sections 366A and 34 of the IPC. They contended that the primary allegation was against their relative Vikash Sharma and that the victim’s statement under Section 164 CrPC was …
The petitioner, Dilip Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged cheating, criminal breach of trust, misappropriation of property and criminal conspiracy (IPC §§ 420, 406, 409, 120B) involving a customer of M/s Swablambi Co-operative Society Ltd. He contended that he was merely the branch manager and …
The petitioners, Surendra Sah and Binod Sah, were named in an FIR for multiple offences arising from a land dispute, including assault and attempted murder. They argued that the incident was a free fight, with both sides sustaining injuries, and that the injury to the informant's father was caused …
Subhash Chandra Mishra was named in a 2022 complaint alleging mental and physical cruelty and dowry demands under Sections 323, 498A and 34 of the IPC, arising from a marriage that took place in 2010. The petitioner argued that the allegations were vague, general and filed twelve years after the …
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged assault with a knife, grievous hurt, and attempt to murder of the informant's daughter, stemming from a dispute over a three‑year live‑in relationship. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the case was false, citing a radiological report …
The petitioners, who are in‑laws of the deceased, were named in an FIR for offences under IPC sections 304‑B (dowry death) and 201/34 (causing disappearance of evidence) relating to the alleged killing of an informant's daughter over a Rs 2 lakh dowry demand. They filed an anticipatory bail …
Kameshwar Prasad Sharma, Chairman of Pawa PACS, was not named in the FIR relating to the alleged misappropriation of 16,768.50 quintals of custom milled rice from a State Food Corporation godown in Nalanda. The petitioner argued that the allegations of conspiracy were directed only at two named …
Balram Singh, Chairman of Kariyanna PACS, was implicated in a FIR (Laheri PS Case No.279 of 2017) concerning missing rice from a State Food Corporation godown, although his name does not appear in the FIR. The FIR names Ranjit Kumar and Abhay Kumar as the primary accused for the alleged loss of …
Vijay Krishna Prasad, Chairman of Lohara PACS, was implicated in a FIR (Laheri PS Case No.279 of 2017) concerning the alleged misappropriation of 16,768.5 quintals of custom milled rice from a State Food Corporation godown. The FIR, filed under Sections 409 read with 34 of the IPC, named only two …
Vivek Kumar Sinha filed an anticipatory bail petition before the Patna High Court. The investigating officer's report was placed on record. After hearing, the petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. Justice Chandra Shekhar Jha allowed the withdrawal, …
The petitioner, a wholesale footwear dealer, was named in a 2005 complaint (No. 1570) alleging offences under Sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code for failing to pay Rs. 1,10,442 to the complainant. The petitioner contended that the dispute was essentially civil, arising from a business …
Ashok Kumar, the Chairman of a Primary Agricultural Credit Society (PACS), was not named in an FIR filed under Sections 409 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code concerning the alleged disappearance of 16,768.50 quintals of custom milled rice from a State Food Corporation godown. He sought …
The petitioner, Md. Rahbar, was named in a 2022 complaint (Case No. 487) alleging offences under Section 498-A of the IPC for mental and physical cruelty, including assault while intoxicated, allegedly over a demand of Rs. 1 lakh. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the complainant, Bibi Rahila …
The petitioners, five individuals from Dumari village in Nawada district, filed an anticipatory bail petition before the Patna High Court. After a prior order in Cr. Misc. No. 19949 of 2024, the petitioners' counsel sought the Court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The …
The petitioners, named in an FIR for alleged murder and conspiracy (IPC Sections 302 and 120B), sought bail after the FIR was lodged 16 days after the alleged incident. They argued that the FIR was delayed, the allegations were vague, and the death was due to a natural cause (brain stroke) rather …
The petitioner, Bipin Kumar, Chairman of a PACS, was not named in an FIR concerning the alleged misappropriation of 16,768.5 quintals of custom milled rice from a State Food Corporation godown. The FIR named only Ranjit Kumar and Abhay Kumar as accused. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail, …
Bhola Prasad, the Chairman of the PACS of Malti Panchayat, was implicated in an FIR (Laheri PS Case No.279 of 2017) concerning the alleged misappropriation of rice from a State Food Corporation godown, although his name does not appear in the FIR. The FIR charges under Sections 409 read with 34 of …
The petitioner, Shashi Raj Kumar, PACS Chairman, was not named in the FIR relating to the alleged misappropriation of rice from a State Food Corporation godown, where two co-accused were charged under Section 409 read with 34 of the IPC. He contended that the allegations were solely against the …
Shayamdev Prasad, Chairman of Nahub PACS, was implicated in a 2017 FIR concerning missing rice from a State Food Corporation godown, although his name does not appear in the FIR. The FIR alleged offences under IPC Section 409 read with Section 34, and the investigation focused on two named …
The petitioner, Santosh Kumar Raj, was named in an FIR for offences under IPC sections 498‑A, 323 and 506/34 and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging mental and physical cruelty for demanding Rs 20 lakh as a loan to start a business. The petitioner sought bail, contending that the demand …
The petitioner, Arjun Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a murder case (IPC Sections 302/34) where he was named as a co-accused. The FIR alleged that he, along with Chhappan Singh and Gautam Ram, lured the informant's son to his house and the son was later found dead. The petitioner …
Bhagamani Devi was arrested in connection with a dowry death case (Section 304‑B IPC) alleging her involvement in the death of an informant's daughter over a buffalo demand. The petitioner argued that the allegation was based solely on suspicion, that the informant was not an eye‑witness, and that …
The petitioner, Nagendra Kumar Singh, was named in an FIR for alleged mental and physical cruelty and dowry harassment under Sections 498-A, 379, 323, 341, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, with a demand of Rs.10 lakh. The petitioner argued that the allegations …
Ram Prasad Singh, Chairman of Cheran PACS, was not named in the FIR relating to the alleged misappropriation of 16,768.5 quintals of custom milled rice from the State Food Corporation's godown in Nalanda. The FIR, filed under IPC sections 409 read with 34, named only Ranjit Kumar and Abhay Kumar as …
The petitioner, Iftekhar Khan, was named in a 2012 complaint alleging cheating, criminal breach of trust and criminal conspiracy (IPC §§406, 420, 120B) for selling a disputed land parcel for Rs. 50,26,000 but failing to deliver possession. The petitioner contended that the land is situated in …
The petitioner, Aman Vishwakarma, was named in a complaint (Case No. 1038 of 2023) alleging offences under Sections 323 and 498A of the IPC for mental and physical cruelty linked to dowry demands. He had previously obtained bail in a related FIR (Case No. 555 of 2023) and was paying interim …
Balram Singh, Chairman of Kariyanna PACS, was implicated in a FIR (Laheri PS Case No.279 of 2017) concerning missing rice from a State Food Corporation godown, although his name does not appear in the FIR. The FIR names Ranjit Kumar and Abhay Kumar as the primary accused for the alleged loss of …
The petitioners, Narmdeshwar Mishra and Mohit Mishra, were implicated in Complaint No.1978 of 2023 for alleged offences under IPC sections 352, 406, 504 and 506/34, stemming from a dispute over unpaid commission where the complainant claimed a commission of Rs.14.40 lakh but received only Rs.4 lakh. …
Manoj Kumar and Kundan Kishore were arrested in connection with a complaint alleging offences under several IPC sections arising from a Rs 45 lakh land transaction. They contended that the sale deed was executed by Asha Devi, their mother‑in‑law, and that the dispute was essentially civil. The State …
Ranjan Kumar was charged in Complaint No. 5494(C)/2021 for alleged offences including assault, robbery and offences under the Prevention of Witch (Dain) Practices Act, with the prosecution alleging he snatched a golden chain. The petitioner contended that the allegations were false, arising from a …
Petitioner Kaif Alam was arrested in connection with an FIR alleging assault with a knife that caused head and lip injuries to his cousin, the informant, under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 303(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita. He filed an anticipatory bail petition, …
Sachchidanand Singh was arrested in connection with a 2019 complaint alleging cheating under Section 420 IPC for allegedly impersonating a co‑owner to mortgage land and obtain a Rs 5 lakh loan from Madhya Gramin Bank. The petitioner contended that the loan was secured only against his share of the …
The petitioner, Pappu Giri, was named in an FIR for murder (IPC s.302 read with s.34) and an offence under the Arms Act (s.27) arising from a land‑dispute incident in which a co‑accused, Chandan Ram, fired the fatal shot. The petitioner contended that the FIR only specifically implicated the …
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition against the State of Bihar and Nibha Kumari. No counsel appeared on his behalf, and he failed to attend hearings despite repeated calls. The respondent’s counsel informed the court that criminal proceedings under Sections 82 and 83 …
Manuu Ram was named in a 2019 complaint (Case No. 510) under Section 498-A IPC for alleged mental and physical cruelty related to dowry demands. He contended that the complainant, Basanti Devi, had been living in adultery with Kishun Ram since 2016 and that the 498-A case was a false, omnibus …
The petitioner, Raj Kishore Rahi, a deed writer, was named in an FIR for alleged cheating under IPC sections 420, 471 and 34, accused of preparing a false sale deed for land claimed by the complainant. He contended that he was merely a witness to the civil transaction and had no role in the alleged …
The petitioner, Shatrujeet Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged cheating of Rs.1,62,000 under IPC sections 323, 406, 420 and 34. The complainant claimed the petitioner failed to provide a promised dealership, but the petitioner’s counsel argued the matter was essentially civil and had been settled …
The petitioner, Sandip Manjhi, was named in an FIR for alleged kidnapping of a 16‑year‑old girl with intent to commit illicit intercourse or marriage, under IPC sections 366‑A read with 34 and POCSO Act section 8. He sought bail, contending that the primary allegation of sexual assault pertained to …
Mukesh Sah and Lalji Sah were named in an FIR for the alleged murder of a man's husband, charged under IPC sections 302 read with 34 and Arms Act section 27. The informant alleged the petitioners shot the victim, but the petitioners contended there was only suspicion and highlighted their clean …
The petitioners, three women from Bhattha Mohamadpur, were named in an FIR under IPC sections 363 and 366-A for allegedly kidnapping the minor daughter of an informant to facilitate illicit intercourse or marriage. They contended that the marriage was consensual, as the girl was in love with the son …
The petitioner, Sanjeev Kumar Chaurasia, was implicated in a complaint (No. 2443 of 2022) alleging cheating through a dishonoured cheque of Rs.55,000 and offences under several IPC sections. He contended that the cheque was never presented to the bank and that no bank memo existed, arguing that the …
The petitioners, Abhinav Shourya and Sunita Devi, filed criminal miscellaneous applications seeking bail in connection with Complaint Case No. 1101(C) of 2023, which alleged multiple offences including dowry harassment and cruelty under various IPC sections and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The …
The petitioners, Abhinav Shourya and Sunita Devi, sought bail in two criminal miscellaneous proceedings arising from a complaint (Case No. 1101(C) of 2023) alleging multiple offences including dowry harassment, cruelty, and other IPC offences. The complainant alleged that Abhinav subjected her to …
The petitioners, Pintu Rai and Deepak Rai, were named in an FIR for offences under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that they overtook and stopped the vehicle of an informant and his deceased relative, after which co‑accused Rajiv Rai and Bhola …
Abu Bakar Siddique was named in a criminal complaint (C.A. No. 451 of 2023) alleging offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 504 and 498-A for mental and physical cruelty stemming from a dowry demand of Rs.2 lakh. The petitioner argued that the complaint was false, unsubstantiated by an affidavit, and …
Ravi Kumar was named in an FIR under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506 and 498‑A of the Indian Penal Code for alleged physical and mental cruelty after the birth of a female child and for demanding a four‑wheeler vehicle. The petitioner sought bail, arguing that the allegations were vague, arose after ten …
The petitioner, Md. Mumtaz Alam, was named in an FIR for offences under IPC sections 323, 341, 504, 498A and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging mental and physical cruelty for non‑payment of a Rs.2 lakh dowry demand. He applied for anticipatory bail, contending that the informant had …
The petitioner, Birendra Mehta, was arrested in a complaint (Case No.295 of 2023) alleging offences under IPC sections 147, 323 and 420 for allegedly receiving Rs 5 lakh under an agreement dated 10‑11‑2020 and failing to execute a sale deed. The petitioner contended that the matter was essentially a …
Ritesh Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous petition against the State of Bihar and Pooja Kumari. The High Court directed the petitioner to appear, but he failed to do so despite a specific order dated 15.01.2026. The opposite party, Pooja Kumari, appeared in person with counsel. The court observed …
The petitioner, Shambhu Kumar, was arrested on 4 May 2024 in connection with offences under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 and has been in custody for about one year and nine months. He filed a second bail application, arguing that the trial had progressed only to the appearance stage, …
