Created by Fuzzy Cloud

CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA

807 judgments · newest first · showing 201–400

Ahmed @ Ahmad Hussain @ Mate Ahmad @ Ahmed MateversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Ahmed Hussain, was charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly abusing an informant in his caste name during a site inspection. The appellant contended that he was unaware of the informant's caste, that the alleged abuse was not …

Rajnish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, Rajnish Kumar and Bikash Kumar Ray, appealed under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against an order dated 03‑09‑2025 of the Additional Sessions Judge‑1 cum Special Judge SC/ST Act, Bhojpur, which had denied bail in a case alleging firing on an informant and …

Md. Hakeem Miya @ Md. HakeemversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Md. Hakeem Miya, was charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly kidnapping a 14‑year‑old daughter of an informant belonging to a Scheduled Caste, purportedly for illicit intercourse or marriage. The appellant contended that the …

Md. Meraj @ MehrajversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Meraj, was named in a 2022 complaint alleging mental and physical cruelty under Sections 498A, 147, 148, 149, 323, 379, 384, 34 of the IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act for demanding Rs.1.5 lakh dowry. He filed an anticipatory bail petition, arguing that the complaint lacked an …

Ishwar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ishwar Kumar was named in an FIR for alleged assault arising from a neighbourhood dispute over a dog bite, with charges under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. He applied for anticipatory bail, contending that he was falsely implicated, that the injury report was unreliable, and …

Sanichari DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Sanichari Devi, Sanjay Chaudhary and Pradeep Chaudhary, were named in an FIR for the murder of an informant's daughter, alleged to have occurred because of a suspicion of an illicit relationship and a demand for money. The petitioners contended that the FIR did not disclose any …

Ankit Singh @ Ankit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ankit Singh was arrested in connection with a cyber‑offence (Sections 66(E), 67 and 67(B) of the Information Technology Act) for allegedly making a video of the informant’s daughter viral after befriending her on Instagram. The petition argued that the FIR did not allege any sexual harassment, none …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manish Kumar was named in an FIR for alleged involvement in cheating in a Sipahi recruitment examination, charged under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and the Bihar Public Examination Prevention of Unfairness Act, 2024. The petitioner argued that his name appeared only because a …

Binda DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Binda Devi and Mosmat Nilam Devi, were named in a complaint (Case No. 7517(C) of 2023) alleging offences under Sections 420 and 120B of the IPC for an illegal land transfer. They contended that the matter was essentially a civil dispute and that they, being women of clean …

Sonu Kumar @ Geet Sagar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Sonu Kumar and Rishikesh Kumar, were named in an FIR (Town P.S. Case No.346 of 2020) under IPC sections 341, 323, 307 read with 34 for allegedly assaulting Jitendra Kumar and throwing him into a drain. The injured party’s statement identified the petitioners and another person as …

Dilkhush @ Dilkhush SahniversusThe State Of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, four residents of Akraha village, were named in an FIR for assault, arson and other offences under the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. They sought anticipatory bail, claiming they were falsely implicated due to a land dispute and that no burnt material was recovered at the scene. The …

Anil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Anil Kumar, was named in an FIR for kidnapping and alleged intent to murder the informant's wife, invoking Sections 137(2), 87 and 3(5) of the BNS. He contended that the case was false, arising from a property dispute with the informant, who is his cousin, and argued that the FIR was …

JAI KARAN KUMARversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Jai Karan Kumar, was arrested in connection with a kidnapping and sexual assault case involving the minor daughter of an informant, under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. The victim, however, recorded a statement under Section …

Dinesh Yadav @ Manjit YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dinesh Yadav, was named in an FIR for the alleged murder of an informant's sister over a dowry demand, charged under Sections 80, 238 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita. He contended that he is the elder brother‑in‑law (bhaisur) and lived separately from the victim, asserting a …

Santosh SahniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Santosh Sahni, was named in an FIR for alleged assault on an informant's family, with charges under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita. He sought anticipatory bail, arguing that the allegations were general, omnibus, and that he has a clean antecedent. The State opposed, …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manish Kumar, a government teacher, was arrested under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the IPC for allegedly forging educational certificates to obtain his job. He contended that the documents were genuine, that he was a victim of a mass drive, and that he had been removed from service …

RAMAN KUMAR @ SRI RAMAN KUMARversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

WITHDRAWN

The appellants filed a criminal appeal before the Patna High Court and subsequently sought the court's permission to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to raise any concerned issues at a later stage. The court considered the request and allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the petition was …

SUMA DEVIversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appeal challenged the cancellation of bail granted to Bijay Mandal in a land‑sale dispute where the complainant alleged cheating, assault and offences under the SC/ST Act. The trial court had granted regular bail on the condition of a modest cash surety, noting that the matter was essentially …

DR. GAUTAM CHOUDHRY @ GAUTAM KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Dr. Gautam Choudhry was accused of assaulting a woman who visited his clinic and her brother, and of using caste-based abusive language, invoking several IPC offences and provisions of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The police filed a closure report in his favour, but the Special Sessions …

YOGENDRA PATHAKversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The appeal (Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.3543 of 2022) arose from PS case No.118 of 2020 concerning YOGENDRA PATHAK and Lodhu Pathak against the State of Bihar and Chandrika Das. The appellants were represented by Mr. Dr. Kamal Deo Sharma, while the respondents were represented by Mr. Sadanand Paswan, …

DROPADI DEVIversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

A petition was filed in the Patna High Court in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 71882 of 2019 arising from a police case in Munger. The petitioners, represented by counsel, sought the court's permission to withdraw their application. The sole issue before the court was whether the petition could be …

CHANDAN BHAGAT @ LADENversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Chandan Bhagat, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Munger, for illegal manufacturing and possession of firearms under Sections 25(1)(a) and 26(11) of the Arms Act, based on a police raid that allegedly recovered gun‑making tools and gunpowder from his house. The …

CICLversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The Patna High Court considered an appeal against the Special Judge's refusal to grant bail to a 17‑year‑old juvenile accused of murder under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the BNS. The appellant was not named in the FIR and the only evidence against him was a confessional statement of a co‑accused; no …

Meena DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Meena Devi, the informant, appealed to the Patna High Court seeking cancellation of the bail granted to Aditya Kumar Jha, who was arrested for offences under sections 103, 238, 61(2), 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita and for murder under IPC section 302. The ground of the appeal was that the …

Demanti Devi @ Deventi DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Demanti Devi and Sunil Kumar were arrested in connection with FIR No. 224 of 2025 alleging mental and physical cruelty, a second marriage, and other offences under the BNS. They contended that the FIR was filed retaliatorily after they lodged a criminal trespass case against the informant’s family, …

Musarraf Alam @ MisterversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Musarraf Alam, was implicated in a complaint alleging kidnapping and rape of a 16‑year‑old girl, the informant’s daughter. The victim initially gave a voluntary statement under Section 183 of the BNSS, claiming she left home of her own accord for Nepal, leading the police to file a …

Dhiru SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dhiru Sahani, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, with 77.250 litres of liquor recovered from an open pond near his residence. The petitioner argued that the seized liquor was …

Sahadev Paswan @ Sahdeo Paswan @ Sahadeo PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sahadev Paswan, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor and possession of a pistol, under Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022. The prosecution alleged recovery of …

MANISH BHARTI @ MANISH KUMAR @ MANISH KUMAR BHARTIversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Manish Bharti, was implicated in a case (PS Case No. 548 of 2025) for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, with 228 litres of liquor recovered from a tempo. He contended that …

Habibur RahmanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Habibur Rahman, was implicated in a case of alleged possession of 57.24 litres of illicit liquor and illegal trading under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, although his name does not appear in the FIR. The liquor was recovered from a motorcycle belonging to the …

VIJAY MANDALversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Vijay Mandal and Vikash Mandal, were named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, with 80 litres of liquor recovered near Madheli Dam. They contended that the recovery was made in a …

Pintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Pintu Kumar was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly manufacturing illicit liquor, with 355.5 litres recovered from a bamboo cluster behind his house. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not in his conscious physical …

Om Prakash Chaurasiya @ Om Prakash Prasad ChaurasiyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Om Prakash Chaurasiya, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, with 220 litres of liquor recovered from a river bank. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious physical …

Sulo Chaudhary @ Surendra ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sulo Chaudhary, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal trading and manufacturing of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, with 29 litres of liquor recovered from his jointly occupied house. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious …

Harendra RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Harendra Rai, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, with 66 litres of liquor recovered from a kiosk. The petitioner contended that the seized liquor was not in his conscious …

Birendra ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Birendra Chaudhary, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged illegal manufacturing of liquor, with 34 litres of illicit liquor recovered from a house. The petitioner contended that the house from which the liquor …

Dilip UraonversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Dilip Uraon was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor, with 35 litres of liquor recovered from a house. The petitioner contended that the recovered liquor was not in his conscious …

Suresh Yadav @ Suresh Prasad Yadav @ Suresh GopversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Suresh Yadav, was named in an FIR for alleged possession of 544.320 litres of illicit liquor and offences under Sections 30(a), 32(3) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. He sought anticipatory bail, contending that his name was implicated only through the testimony …

Ranjit Mahto @ Ranjit Kumar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ranjit Mahto, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, with 131 litres of liquor recovered from an open area near his village. He sought bail, arguing that the liquor was not found …

Rina DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rina Devi was named in an FIR for allegedly possessing 20 litres of illicit liquor and engaging in illegal trade under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. She applied for anticipatory bail, contending that the liquor was recovered from a courtyard shared by several family members …

Pappu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pappu Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, with 18 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle. The petitioner contended that the motorcycle was not linked to …

Dheeraj Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dheeraj Kumar Sah, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor, with 69 litres of IMFL recovered from a motorcycle. He contended that his name appeared only because of a …

Vijay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vijay Kumar was named in an FIR for alleged possession of 241.125 litres of illicit liquor and alleged violations of IPC sections 272, 273 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that the liquor was recovered from a vehicle that did not belong to him …

Sanjay RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners were named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, involving the recovery of 120 litres of IMFL from an open river belt. They contended that their identification was based merely on suspicion arising from a local watchman's testimony and that the liquor …

Manoj YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manoj Yadav was named in an FIR for allegedly possessing 20.250 litres of illicit liquor and engaging in illegal trade under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He contended that the liquor was recovered from an open area behind his house, which he does not own, …

Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Raushan Kumar and Chandeshwar Rai, were named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor, with 795.870 litres of IMFL recovered in an Excise case. They contended that the seized liquor was not in their conscious physical possession and that the seizure …

Madho Sah @ Modi SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Madho Sah was named in an FIR for allegedly possessing 212.175 litres of illicit liquor and engaging in illegal trade under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 (Amended). He contended that the liquor was seized from a vehicle that he neither owned nor drove, and that his …

Ashish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ashish Kumar, was implicated in a case for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor, with 1,783.8 litres recovered from a Bolero pickup van he owned. He argued that his only connection to the offence was ownership of the vehicle, not actual possession or …

Anil ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Anil Choudhary, was named in an FIR for allegedly possessing two litres of illicit liquor and engaging in illegal trade under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The liquor was recovered from a pile of wood behind his house, an open area accessible to the public, …

Bipin Paswan @ Vipin PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bipin Paswan, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor, with 441.3 litres recovered from a motorcycle. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious physical possession and that the seizure list lacked independent witness support. …

Raghunath SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raghunath Sah, was implicated in a case (PS Case No. 98 of 2025) for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor after 18 litres of IMFL/Mahua were recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he was only the registered owner of the vehicle and had no conscious …

Sant Lal Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sant Lal Kumar Singh, who was not named in the FIR, was apprehended in connection with a murder case (Nautan P.S. Case No. 185 of 2021) involving offences under IPC Sections 302, 120B/34 and Arms Act Section 27. The petitioner argued that the informant was not an eye‑witness and that the FIR …

Vijay Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vijay Kumar Singh, a former director of Zenovia Healthcare Pvt Ltd, was named in a complaint alleging dishonour of two cheques worth Rs. 16 lakh each, invoking Sections 420 of the IPC and 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He contended that the rent agreement and cheques were executed by the …

Nirmal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Nirmal Kumar and Shiv Prasad Rai, elected officials of Ward No. 5, Hardiya Panchayat, were named in an FIR alleging defalcation of funds allotted under the Nal‑Jal Yojana and the construction of a substandard water tank that collapsed. They contended that the money had been …

Sanjay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar, a Class III employee of T.M.B. University, was implicated in a university case for allegedly forging certificates and cheating, alleged under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. He applied for anticipatory bail, contending …

Bhola SaoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Bhola Sao and Alok Sao, were named in an FIR for offences under Sections 406, 420 and 120(B) of the IPC arising from an alleged abuse of the informant and her family at Bhola's house. The petitioners contended that the matter was essentially a civil dispute over a land sale …

Chitranjan Kumar @ Chitranjan Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chitranjan Kumar, was named in an FIR for allegedly cheating Rs. 52 lakhs from an informant, with charges under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act. He contended that the dispute stemmed from a partnership disagreement over profit sharing in the …

Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mukesh Kumar, the petitioner, was named in a 2016 complaint alleging criminal breach of trust under IPC Section 406 and dishonour of cheque under NI Act Section 138 for allegedly failing to repay a Rs. six lakh loan. He contended that the complaint was unsubstantiated, lacked an affidavit, and …

Shatrudhan Sah @ Shatrohan SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Shatrudhan Sah and Niharika Kumari, were named in an FIR for alleged offences under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita in connection with an illegal land transfer where they acted as witnesses to the sale deed. They contended that the matter was essentially civil, that …

MURARI SINGHversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION

Murari Singh appealed against his acquittal in a criminal case decided in 2020. The appeal was filed in the Patna High Court but no counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant despite repeated calls. The court noted that the appeal had been pending for five years and the appellant appeared to have …

Bihar through the District Magistrate, BegusaraiversusSangeeta Kumari

DISMISSED

The State of Bihar appealed the acquittal of Sangeeta Kumari, who was alleged to have been present in a house where a large consignment of foreign liquor was seized. The prosecution relied on the testimony of eight police witnesses and an informant, but many of those witnesses contradicted each …

Bittu Kumar @ Bittu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellant, Bittu Kumar, filed a criminal appeal (SJ) No.3084 of 2025 and a criminal revision No.745 of 2024 before the Patna High Court challenging a conviction by the State of Bihar. The court examined the report from the District and Sessions Judge, 1st-cum-Special Court, Madhepura, dated …

KRISHNA KUMAR SHARMAversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellant, a clinic owner, appealed against the order cancelling the regular bail of three accused who were charged with fraud involving passport and visa services, assault, and caste-based harassment, amounting to Rs. 18.69 lakh. The prosecution alleged that the accused took money from about …

Munna SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Munna Sahani, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a FIR (Case No. 314 of 2021) that alleged his involvement in a murder and related offences under the IPC, Arms Act and Explosive Substances Act. The petitioner was not named in the FIR; his alleged involvement stemmed solely …

Vikash Kumar @ Bikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Vikash Kumar, filed an application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding (Criminal Miscellaneous No.5606 of 2026) arising from a case registered in 2024. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought the court’s permission to withdraw the application. The Hon'ble Justice considered …

Ranvir YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ranvir Yadav was named in an FIR for demanding ransom from a government contractor, with charges under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act. He contended that the main allegation was against his co-accused Bharat Yadav and that a compromise had been reached between …

Krishna Kumar @ Krishna GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Krishna Kumar and Deepak Kumar, were named in an FIR for alleged assault and other offences under the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, stemming from a dispute involving the informant's relationship with a co-accused. They contended that the allegations of physical assault were vague, …

HIMANSHU KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Himanshu Kumar, was named in an FIR relating to a sexual assault case involving a 14‑year‑old victim, where the FIR specifically alleges that Prince Kumar, son of Chandra Kishore Singh, committed penetrative rape. The petitioner contended that no allegation of penetrative assault was …

Bhagwan Prasad MandalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, members of the Mandal family, were charged in a 2021 case for kidnapping, attempted sexual assault, and related offences under several IPC sections. The alleged victim, the informant's daughter, recorded a statement under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. stating she was 18, voluntarily …

Babloo KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Babloo Kumar and Nitam Kumari, brother‑in‑law and sister‑in‑law of a deceased woman, were named in an FIR for a dowry‑death under Sections 80(2), 238(a) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The FIR alleged that the death resulted from the non‑payment of a Rs 50,000 dowry demand made on the …

Vishal Kumar @ Vishal PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vishal Kumar was arrested in connection with a 2021 case alleging illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor under several provisions of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act. The police seized 100 litres of Mahua liquor from the bank of a river and claimed it belonged to the …

Pranav KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pranav Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 394 and 307 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging robbery and attempted murder at a petrol pump. He was not named in the FIR; his alleged involvement stems solely from a confessional statement of …

Rupesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rupesh Kumar and Kamlesh Kumar were implicated in a cyber‑crime FIR alleging fraud through forged online advertisements for loans and escort services, with several offences listed under the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita. The petitioners contended that no direct incriminating evidence linked them to the …

Sanjeet Kumar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sanjeet Kumar Mahto, was implicated in a case involving alleged conspiracy (IPC s.120(b)) and violations of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the recovery of 1103.04 litres of illicit liquor from a vehicle. The liquor was allegedly linked to a co-accused who used the …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners—Manish Kumar, Vikash Kumar and Sandeep Kumar—sought bail in a criminal case (Sessions Trial No. 88 of 2024) arising from FIR No. 21 of 2023, which alleged offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 307 and Arms Act section 27. They were summoned under Section 319 of the Cr.P.C. …

Sanoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Sanoj Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged offences under Sections 21(c) and 25 of the NDPS Act after 115 litres of Wiscop cough syrup containing the prohibited drug codeine were recovered from his vehicle. The petitioner contended that he merely owned the vehicle, which had been …

Vijay Kumar @ Bijendra Kumar @ Bijendra SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vijay Kumar was named in an FIR for supplying spurious liquor that caused two deaths, alleged to have occurred on 29-10-2021. The petitioner contended that he was in judicial custody for a separate case (Kudhani PS Case No. 751 of 2021) from 10-10-2021, as evidenced by a bail order dated 22-12-2021. …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manish Kumar was named in an FIR for several offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Information Technology Act after a police raid on a cyber‑crime hub. The raid recovered mobiles but no incriminating material was found at his residence; a co‑accused merely identified him among 12 …

Bablu ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Bablu Chaudhary, was named in an FIR for alleged fraud and related offences under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and the Information Technology Act. During a police raid, cash of Rs. 1,35,000, ATM cards, passbooks, and cheque books were recovered from his …

Ashutosh Kumar @ MantuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ashutosh Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018, with 225 litres of liquor reportedly recovered. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not seized from his …

Bindeshwari SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner sought cancellation of the bail granted to him on 11 July 2023, arguing that he had not complied with condition (ii) which required the opposite party No.2 to pay Rs. 60 lakhs as part of a compromise. The court observed that the underlying dispute was civil, pending as Title Suit …

Vishnu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vishnu Kumar petitioned for bail in a case registered under Sections 310(3) and 317(5) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He was not named in the FIR and has been in custody since 8 June 2025. The only link to him is a confessional statement of a co‑accused, with no other incriminating …

M.R. MustafaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

M.R. Mustafa was arrested in connection with a case involving the illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, for which he was charged under Sections 272 and 273 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He had been in custody since 9 December 2025 and argued that he …

Rohit Kumar @ GoluversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, filed his third successive bail application in a criminal case where the trial is nearing completion. Counsel argued that all prosecution witnesses, including the doctor and investigating officer, have already been examined. The court noted that the trial is at its final …

Jitendra SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Jitendra Sah, was arrested in connection with the alleged dowry‑related murder of his wife, who died from burn injuries after kerosene was poured on her. He is charged under several IPC sections (341, 323, 325, 326, 307, 506, 498‑A) and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, …

Surendra RautversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Surendra Raut was arrested in connection with a violent incident at the Indo‑Nepal border where a crowd assaulted police and the petitioner was alleged to have attempted to snatch an INSAS rifle from an injured constable. The FIR listed a slew of offences under the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and …

Mukesh ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mukesh Chaudhary was arrested in connection with a dacoity alleged to have taken place at M/s Spandan Sphurti Finance Limited, where Rs. Seven Lakhs was allegedly looted at gunpoint. The petitioner was not named in the FIR and his alleged involvement rests solely on the confessional statement of a …

Krishna Kanhaiya @ SarkarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Krishna Kanhaiya sought bail for offences under Sections 109 read with 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He was not named in the FIR and had been in custody since 14 September 2025. The allegation against him stemmed solely from the confessional statement of …

Sujeet Kumar SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Sujeet Kumar Sharma, was named in an FIR for alleged offences under Sections 8(c), 21(c), 22(c), 25 and 29 of the NDPS Act, based on the recovery of 299.32 grams of smokeless tobacco (smack) and 1189 litres of Wiscof syrup containing codeine. The prosecution alleged that the …

Rupesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Rupesh Kumar, was named in an FIR for offences under Sections 307, 34, 393 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act, relating to a robbery during which a firearm injury was caused. He sought anticipatory bail, arguing that his name surfaced only through the confessional statement of …

Dharmendra Kumar Ray @ Dharmendra RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar Ray, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. The court observed that the petitioner had been declared an absconder in 2023. Relying on that status, the court held that anticipatory bail could not be granted. Consequently, the petition for …

Ganesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ganesh Yadav was arrested in connection with theft of a land‑lifting excavator and alleged illegal sand mining, charged under Section 379 IPC and Sections 4(i) and 21 of the Bihar Mine and Minerals Development and Regulations Act. He had been in custody since 30 July 2025 and filed a bail petition. …

Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Raushan Kumar was named in an FIR for alleged assault and threat to a 19‑year‑old informant in a case where the co‑accused was accused of rape. The petitioner argued that the allegations against him were vague, that he had a clean antecedent, and that the serious rape charge did not pertain to him. …

Roushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Roushan Kumar, was named in an FIR under Section 80 read with 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita for the death of the informant's daughter, who allegedly died after being assaulted. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the death was due to natural causes following a cesarean …

Ekbal MiyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ekbal Miya was named in an FIR for assaulting an informant, his daughter, and kidnapping the informant's minor daughter for marriage, under several IPC sections and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, being only the father of the main co-accused, and pointed to …

DEEPAN PASWANversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Deepan Paswan, was named in an FIR for alleged murder under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, arising from a local dispute. He contended that he had no direct involvement, stating that his only connection was a personal acquaintance with co‑accused Kanchan …

Vikash Kumar Yadav @ Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vikash Kumar Yadav was arrested in connection with a murder case (Sections 302/34 IPC and Section 27 Arms Act) where five co‑accused allegedly shot the husband of an informant. The petitioner sought bail, arguing that the informant was not an eye‑witness and that the investigation was already …

Kalinda DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The Patna High Court heard two anticipatory bail petitions arising from PS Maharajganj Case No.242 of 2021. The first petition (Cr. Misc. No.6306) sought bail on the ground of a post‑FIR compromise, but the court held that the offence was heinous and non‑compoundable, so the earlier denial of bail …

Baiju SahniversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, Baiju Sahni and his wife Shila Devi, were named in an FIR for the murder of an informant's husband, alleged to have been caused by assault with an iron rod, spear and other weapons. Both sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court examined …

Seema Devi @ Seema kumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Seema Devi filed a petition seeking cancellation of the bail granted to Rajan Sharma. The petitioner argued that the bail should be set aside. The State and the accused opposed the petition. The court observed that an identical prayer for cancellation of bail was already pending before the trial …

Purushotam Kumar @ Purushotam Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Purushotam Kumar Singh was apprehended for possible arrest in a murder case (Case No. 154 of 2022) involving offences under IPC sections 302, 120(B), 34 and Arms Act section 27. He was not named in the FIR and the police had filed a closure report in his favour, which was accepted by the …

Sunny Deval yadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Sunny Deval Yadav, was named in an FIR for murder, culpable homicide, conspiracy and abetment (IPC §§302, 201, 120(B), 34) and sought anticipatory bail. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that co‑accused had been granted bail, and that the FIR only alleged he called the …

Sarita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Sarita Devi and Rangila Kumar, mother‑in‑law and brother‑in‑law of the deceased, were implicated in a dowry‑death case (Shahkund P.S. Case No. 123 of 2024) under Sections 304B and 201 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for allegedly causing the death of the …

Chandan Sah @ Chandan Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Chandan Sah, was named in an FIR for allegedly kidnapping and raping a 14‑year‑old girl, offences charged under Sections 65 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail, arguing that the medical …

Shambhu SahuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Shambhu Sahu, was named in an FIR for alleged cheating in a land transaction and charged under Sections 318(4), 308(3), 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. He contended that he was only a witness to the agreement and derived no monetary benefit, arguing that the …

Ritik KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ritik Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged cyber fraud and related offences under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code (BNS) and the Information Technology Act. The FIR alleged that objectionable material was recovered during a raid, but no incriminating material was found on …

Husne Ali SaifiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Husne Ali Saifi, was named in an FIR for alleged hacking of the RCMS portal to obtain ration cards, facing charges under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act. He contended that he operates a legitimate Customer Service Centre and that …

Nawal Kishor Ray @ Naval Kishor RayversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Petitioner Nawal Kishor Ray filed an anticipatory bail petition in the Patna High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The Court examined whether a petitioner is entitled to withdraw an anticipatory bail application. It held …

Upendra DubeyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Upendra Dubey, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Mairwa P.S. Case No. 138/2025) under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act. The FIR was based solely on the informant’s suspicion after a dead body was found, and the petitioner was not an …

Om Narayan ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Om Narayan Manjhi, was arrested in connection with a neighbourhood dispute that led to an alleged assault on an informant and others, resulting in charges under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 397, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner contended that the incident was a …

PAMMY DEVI @ PAMMY CHAUBEYversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Pammy Devi, the petitioner, was arrested in a complaint case alleging forgery and cheating under Sections 467, 468 and 34 of the IPC related to a land dispute. She contended that she was the bona‑fide purchaser of the land, that the matter was essentially a civil family dispute, and that she had a …

Md. Shakib @ Shakib NehalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Md. Shakib, filed a bail application in a criminal miscellaneous case pending before the Patna High Court. The trial was at its final stage with only one official witness, a doctor, yet to be examined. The court considered that the trial was nearing completion and that the pending …

Md. Kallu @ Kallu MiyanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Md. Kallu was arrested in connection with the alleged murder of an informant’s father, an incident said to have arisen after a dispute at a toddy shop owned by Kaushalya Devi. The FIR, based largely on Kaushalya Devi’s statement, implicated Kallu along with unknown persons under Sections 103(1) and …

Manish Kumar @ ChintuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manish Kumar had been in custody since 19 February 2024 for a case registered as Vaishali P.S. Case No. 328 of 2020. Only six of ten prosecution witnesses had been examined, and an informant had given a clean chit to the petitioner. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the two‑year detention without …

Kamlesh Pathak @ Praduman PathakversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Kamlesh Pathak, was arrested in connection with a 2002 dacoity and murder case (Section 396 IPC) based solely on a confessional statement of a co‑accused, Ram Ballabh Sahni. The petitioner was not named in the FIR and had been in custody since 25‑08‑2025. He sought bail, arguing that …

Ambika Kumar @ Akhilesh Kumar Singh @ Akhilesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ambika Kumar, was arrested in connection with a SC/ST police case alleging gang rape and caste-based abuse, with charges under multiple sections of the BNS, the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. The petitioner argued that the alleged victim was an adult, the FIR was lodged 20 days after …

Baijnath Das @ Baidyanath DasversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Baijnath Das was arrested in connection with a land‑dispute related assault alleged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 308(3), 352 and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code. He has been in custody since 17‑Nov‑2025 and sought bail, contending that the incident was a "free fight" in which both …

Krishana Singh @ Krishana KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Krishana Singh was arrested in connection with a murder case (Gaighat P.S. Case No. 89 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 302, 201, 506 and 34 of the IPC. He has been in custody since 4 July 2025 and contended that he was not involved, pointing out that the injured …

Vinay Pal @ Binay PalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vinay Pal was arrested in connection with a kidnapping and murder case (Sections 364 and 302 IPC) arising from an incident on 26 May 2022, with the FIR lodged 45 days later. The petitioner, claiming a clean antecedent, argued that the investigation was complete, a charge sheet had been filed, and no …

Khushabu Kumari @ Muskan @ Khushabu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Khushabu Kumari, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Amnour PS Case No.22 of 2025) under Sections 331(6), 103(1) and 61(2) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, although she is not named in the FIR. The FIR alleges that several co‑accused murdered the informant's son while …

Niraj Kumar PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Niraj Kumar Paswan, was arrested in connection with offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Immoral Trafficking (Prevention) Act and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, based on a FIR in which the alleged victim claimed to be 18 years old. He sought …

Rajesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Rajesh Kumar was arrested in June 2025 for alleged possession of 30 bottles of Wincerex cough syrup and 547 tablets of various medicines, offences punishable under Section 21(C) of the NDPS Act. He contended that the contraband was recovered from a joint family house and that he did not …

Indu DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Indu Devi, the wife of co-accused Sanjay Yadav, was arrested in connection with a murder case (PS Case No. 25 of 2024) involving the killing of an informant's aunt, allegedly over a land dispute. The petitioner sought bail, arguing that the allegations arose from a property dispute, the …

Abhishek Kumar DubeyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar Dubey, was arrested in connection with a dowry‑related complaint (Case No. 1260 of 2022) alleging mental and physical cruelty under multiple IPC sections and Section 5 of the Anaitik Vyapar Adhiniam. The complaint was filed on 21‑12‑2022, nine months after the alleged …

Abhimanyu Kumar @ Abhimanyu RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Abhimanyu Kumar, was named in an FIR for the murder of an informant's married daughter, an offence alleged primarily against the victim's husband, Mukesh Kumar. The petitioner, a cousin of the husband, asserted that the FIR contains no specific allegation against him and highlighted …

Shivam Kumar @ Shivam Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shivam Kumar was named in an FIR for allegedly manufacturing 110 litres of illegal Windlas syrup, violating Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 and several provisions of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act. The prosecution’s case relied on a co‑accused’s disclosure and police …

Dilip RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, four residents of Gadal village, were implicated in a police FIR (Case No. 266 of 2021) for alleged assault on police officers using weapons, under multiple IPC sections. They argued that they were not named in the FIR, the allegations were vague and omnibus, and that the …

Gulshan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Gulshan Kumar filed an anticipatory bail petition before the Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous case. He later approached the court seeking permission to withdraw the bail application. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Devendra Kumar, submitted the withdrawal request. The court examined the …

Purnwashi Yadav @ Purnwashi KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Purnwashi Yadav, was arrested in connection with a shooting incident that injured Bablu Kumar, the cousin of an informant, over a money dispute related to sugarcane purchase. He was charged under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act, …

Mumtaj Alam @ Mantaj AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners were named in an FIR alleging kidnapping of a 17‑year‑old girl for illicit intercourse or marriage, with offences under IPC sections 366A, 504, 506 and 34 and POCSO Act sections 4 and 8. Petitioners 1 and 2 were named in the FIR, while 3 and 4 were not; they claim they were merely …

Shankar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shankar Yadav, who was not named in the FIR, was apprehended in connection with a looted truck case (Amas P.S. Case No. 377 of 2022) involving theft of coal and cash. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that no incriminating material linked him to the crime except a vague suspicion arising …

Vinod Paswan @ Binod Paswan @ Arun YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Vinod Paswan, was arrested in connection with a murder arising from a land dispute and charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code (341, 323, 302, 307, 506 read with 34). He had been in custody since 19 March 2025 and applied for bail. The petitioner argued that the FIR …

Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh MandalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mukesh Kumar, accused under Sections 8 and 20(b)(ii)(c) of the NDPS Act for alleged possession of 61.150 kg of ganja recovered from a co-accused's house, sought bail after being in custody since 16‑06‑2025. He argued that he was not apprehended on the spot, surrendered voluntarily, and that the …

Sonu Kumar @ Gulu Kumar @ Golu @ Golu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sonu Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he kidnapped a 17‑year‑old girl, the informant’s daughter, for illicit intercourse or marriage. The girl’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) indicated that she left her parents’ home …

Ratnesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ratnesh Kumar, was arrested in connection with an alleged attempt to commit rape under Sections 64, 62, 76 read with 3(5) of the Bhartiya Naya Sanhita, 2023. He has been in custody since 13 May 2025. The petitioner contended that the dispute was settled through a compromise petition …

Praful Kumar @ Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Praful Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged possession of a loaded pistol, another loaded pistol, and eleven live cartridges, and charged under Sections 310(4), 310(5), 317(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 25(1-A) and 25(1-B) of the Arms …

Lal Bachan SahniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Lal Bachan Sahni, who was not named in the FIR, sought bail for alleged offences of murder, attempt to conceal murder, criminal conspiracy and illegal possession of arms under IPC sections 302, 404, 120‑B read with 34 and Arms Act section 27. He has been in custody since 6 February 2024 after his …

Arun RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Arun Ray, who was not named in the FIR, was arrested in connection with a 2019 murder case (Sadar P.S. Case No.555) involving offences under Section 302 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case relied solely on a confessional statement of a co‑accused, Varun Kumar, and no other …

Raj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Raj Kumar was arrested in connection with a robbery case (Chiraiya P.S. Case No.520 of 2022) under Section 392 of the IPC, although his name does not appear in the FIR. The prosecution’s case against him rests solely on a confessional statement made by co‑accused Nitesh Kumar, and no physical …

Awadhesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Awadhesh Kumar, who was not named in the FIR, was arrested on 7 May 2025 in connection with a murder case and alleged offences under Sections 103(1) and 61(2) of the Bihar Non‑Compulsory Statutes and the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case rested mainly on a confessional statement of a co‑accused, with …

Mithun KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mithun Kumar, arrested on 08‑07‑2024, remained in custody for over a year and seven months while his trial was pending. His earlier bail petition was dismissed as withdrawn, and he filed a second successive bail petition on two grounds: the trial had not concluded within six months as previously …

Mintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mintu Kumar was arrested in connection with a robbery case (Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 87 of 2025) under Section 309(6) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, although his name does not appear in the FIR. He has been in custody since 9 March 2025. The only link to him is a confessional statement made by …

Shrawan Pal @ Shrawan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Shrawan Pal, Bipen Pal and Pawan Kumar, were arrested in connection with an alleged assault that resulted in the death of the informant's brother. The FIR indicates that the informant left the scene and was not an eye‑witness to the entire incident, and the allegations of assault …

Shammi KapoorversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shammi Kapoor was arrested in connection with a dacoity at PP Jewellers, Begusarai, and charged under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and the Arms Act. He has been in custody since 28‑11‑2024. Two FIRs were lodged for the same incident (Case No. 575 and Case No. 576). Bail …

Gyani Kumar @ Gyanu @ Gyanu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Gyani Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Sessions Trial No. 960 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 103(1), 238(a), 303(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. He is not named in the FIR and has been in custody since 26‑02‑2025. The prosecution’s case rests on a …

Rupesh RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rupesh Ram was arrested in connection with a case under the NDPS Act for alleged possession of 58 kg of ganja recovered from a co-accused's partially constructed house. The only incriminating material against him was the statement of co-accused Bahru Mandal, who had already been granted bail and …

Vijay ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vijay Chaudhary was arrested in connection with a case under the NDPS Act and the Arms Act for allegedly possessing 1 kg 5 gms of charas, a pistol and live cartridges. He sought bail, arguing that the weight was marginally above the commercial quantity threshold and that the packaging weight should …

Shivnath SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shivnath Sah was arrested in connection with the murder of Rahul Kumar under Sections 103(1), 3(5) and 61(2) of the BNS and has been in custody since 30‑08‑2025. The petitioner applied for bail, contending that the FIR was based solely on hearsay from an informant who was not an eye‑witness and that …

Shashi Kumar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Shashi Kumar Mahto, was arrested in connection with a case alleging rape of a 16‑year‑old girl, charged under IPC sections 376(2) and 376(2)(n), section 6 of the POCSO Act and section 9 of the Child Marriage Restraint Act. He contended that the alleged victim was his wife, the …

Lalan SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Lalan Sah was arrested in connection with an NDNDPS case where 94 grams of brown sugar was seized from co‑accused and a motorcycle, not from his possession. He has been in custody since 13 October 2025 and applied for bail, arguing that the evidence against him is merely circumstantial and that the …

Krishna SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, accused in a criminal case arising from a land dispute, applied for bail alleging they assaulted an informant with a sword and lathi, causing simple injuries. The FIR alleged intent to kill, but a medical report showed the injuries were minor, negating a prima facie intention to …

Sunil Kumar Singh @ Sunil SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, accused of assault with a sword and lathi in a land‑dispute incident, were charged under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, including offences relating to grievous hurt and attempt to cause death. They had been in custody since 12 August 2025 and sought bail, …

Chotu Singh @ Chhotu Kumar @ Chhotu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, accused of assault with a sword and lathi in a land‑dispute incident, were charged under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, including offences relating to grievous hurt and attempt to cause death. They had been in custody since 12 August 2025 and sought bail, …

Gudiya Devi @ Muskan @ Gudiya @ Gudiya KumariversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Gudiya Devi, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought to withdraw the petition and requested liberty to file a modification petition under the earlier order dated 01.05.2025. The Court considered the request …

Deepak Sah @ Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Deepak Sah, was arrested in connection with an NDNDPS case and an offence under Section 111 of the Bhartiya Naya Sanhita, 2023. The seized 94 grams of brown sugar was recovered from co‑accused Radheyshyam Yadav and Lalita Devi, not from the petitioner, and the motorcycle from which …

Fantesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Fantesh Kumar was named in an FIR for alleged cyber fraud and related offences under the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita and the Information Technology Act. The petitioner argued that his name was recorded only based on statements of co‑accused and that no incriminating material was recovered from …

Rinki DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rinki Devi, a maid, was named in an FIR for alleged theft of a wrist‑watch and Rs 18,000 from her employer’s house. She contended that the accusation was false, arising from a salary dispute and her refusal of the employer’s brother’s sexual advances, and highlighted a 60‑day delay in filing the FIR …

Heera Paswan @ Heera KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The High Court heard two anticipatory bail applications arising from FIR No. 142 of 2025 in Punaura, Sitamarhi, which alleged offences under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Securitization Act (BNS) and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Heera Paswan was alleged to have fired a weapon, injuring two …

Dinesh Kumar @ Dinesh RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, parents of a co-accused in a rape and video‑sharing case, sought bail after being implicated as supporters of the alleged offender. The FIR alleged offences under Sections 64, 123, 318(2), 351(2), 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita and Sections 67 and 67(A) of the Information …

Suraj Kumar @ Baudhu Mandal @ Baithu MandalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Ravi Kumar Verma, Sunil Kumar Verma and Suraj Kumar, were arrested in connection with Lakhisarai Police Station Case No. 160 of 2025 for alleged kidnapping of the informant's son and related offences under Sections 137(2) and 140(1) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. They applied …

Om Prakash @ BittuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Om Prakash, was arrested in connection with a case involving possession of 14.67 grams of narcotic substance, a country‑made pistol, and diesel‑like liquids. He argued that the seized items were recovered from a vehicle’s dickey without his conscious knowledge and that the narcotic …

Ajay Kumar Pandey @ Ajay Pandey @ Ajay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Ajay Kumar Pandey, filed a bail application in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from PS case No.199 of 2018. The trial had progressed to the stage where prosecution evidence was already closed and the matter was fixed for examination of defence witnesses. The petitioner’s senior …

Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, was arrested on 23 June 2025 for alleged possession of 1,800 bottles of Triprolidine Hydrochloride and Codeine Phosphate syrup, offences under Sections 21 and 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. He applied for bail, arguing that a co-accused in the …

Ravi Kumar VermaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Ravi Kumar Verma, Sunil Kumar Verma and Suraj Kumar, were arrested in connection with a kidnapping alleged to have been committed to facilitate a murder, as recorded in Lakhisarai Police Station Case No. 160 of 2025 under Sections 137(2), 140(1) read with 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya …

Shyam Kishore MishraversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shyam Kishore Mishra, accused under Sections 8, 20(b)(ii)(C), 25 and 29 of the NDPS Act, has been in custody since 14 September 2022. His first bail application was rejected in September 2023 with a direction to expedite the trial. The second bail petition highlighted that only seven of nine …

Manoj Kumar JaiswalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manoj Kumar Jaiswal was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 20(b)(ii)(c) and 29 of the NDPS Act after 31.883 kg of alleged ganja was seized from his house. The petitioner argued that the seizure was politically motivated, that the material was not confirmed as ganja before forensic …

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged firing and planting a live bomb, charged under multiple sections of the IPC, the Arms Act and the Explosive Substances Act. He had been in custody since 21 October 2022 and argued that his inclusion in the FIR was …

Md. Nashruddin @ Mohammad NasaruddinversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Nashruddin, was arrested in connection with a murder arising from a land dispute and charged under several IPC sections including 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 302 and 506. He has been in custody since 21 May 2024 based largely on the informant’s suspicion, with no eyewitness …

Pappu MandalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Pappu Mandal, who was not named in the FIR, was arrested on 20 August 2025 in connection with a case involving alleged murder of an informant's husband and several other offences under the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner sought bail, arguing that the informant was not an eye‑witness, the …

Md. SumitversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md Sumit, was arrested on 13-12-2024 in connection with multiple offences under the BNSS, POCSO Act and Immoral Traffic Act, alleged to have forced a girl into immoral activities. He contended that the police failed to prepare an arrest memo as required by Section 47 of the BNSS, …

Poonam DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Poonam Devi, was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged kidnapping, theft and rape under IPC sections 363, 366 and 376(2)(g). The victim, a 19‑year‑old girl, initially claimed she was eloped by Poonam Devi in the FIR, but later named a different person, Rinku Devi, in a …

Tanveer ShekhversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Tanveer Shekh, was arrested in connection with a dacoity case (Jalley P.S. Case No. 200 of 2024) under Sections 310(2) and 311 of the B.N.S., though his name does not appear in the FIR. He was taken into custody on 23‑01‑2025 based solely on a self‑confessional statement, with no …

Gurnam SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Gurnam Singh, a driver, was arrested for allegedly transporting 286.75 kg of ganja in a container and charged under Sections 8, 20(b)(ii)(c), 25 and 29 of the NDPS Act. He contended that he had no knowledge of the contraband, invoking Section 35 of the NDPS Act, and argued that mandatory procedures …

Munna Singh @ Shashidhar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The High Court considered three bail applications filed by Sunil Singh, Munna Singh and Upendra Singh, who were implicated in a murder case (Basudeva PS Case No. 39/2025) under Section 103(1) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioners were not named in the FIR; their alleged …

Sunil Singh @ Sunil YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The High Court considered three bail applications filed by Sunil Singh, Munna Singh and Upendra Singh, who were implicated in a murder case (Basudeva PS Case No. 39/2025) under Section 103(1) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioners were not named in the FIR; their alleged …

Upendra SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The High Court considered three bail applications filed by Sunil Singh, Munna Singh and Upendra Singh, who were implicated in a murder case (Basudeva PS Case No. 39/2025) under Section 103(1) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioners were not named in the FIR; their alleged …

Uttam Kumar @ Utam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The High Court considered two anticipatory bail petitions filed by Uttam Kumar and Amit Kumar, who were named in FIR No. 242 of 2025 for alleged cyber‑fraud offences under the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act, 2000. Police raids recovered debit cards, mobiles, cash and …

Abhay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Abhay Kumar, was named in an FIR for offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita relating to a rape‑murder case in which co‑accused Rajpal Mahto was the principal offender. The petitioner was alleged to have helped rescue Rajpal from the custody of the informant and villagers after the …

Sunil PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sunil Paswan was named in an FIR for alleged cyber‑related offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act, based on information obtained from co‑accused persons seized in a raid. No incriminating material was recovered from Paswan’s possession, and he maintains a …

Raj Kishore Ray @ MalahuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Raj Kishore Ray sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 420 and 120(B) of the IPC and Sections 30(a), 32(ii) and 41(i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, where 4,725.72 litres of illicit liquor were seized from a vehicle he …

Dharmendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged cyber fraud and related offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act, 2000. He applied for anticipatory bail, contending that his involvement was inferred solely from a co-accused's statement and …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Sonu Kumar, Ankit Kumar and Ritik Kumar, were named in an FIR for alleged cyber‑fraud and related offences under the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita and the Information Technology Act. The prosecution’s case relied on statements of co‑accused persons, but no incriminating material …

Ramakant Kumar @ Ramakant MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ramakant Kumar, was arrested in connection with a neighbourhood dispute that led to a violent altercation, for which he was charged under several IPC provisions including assault and attempted murder. He applied for bail, contending that the incident was a mutual free‑fight, that he …

Syamkant @ Shyamkant KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Syamkant Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a case (Kotwa PS Case No. 95 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the IPC. He alleged that the incident was a mutual free‑fight arising from a neighbourhood dispute, and that …

Neeraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Neeraj Kumar, who was not named in the FIR, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Bibhutipur PS Case No.442 of 2024) and has been in custody since 08‑08‑2025. He sought bail, arguing that his name only surfaced from the confessional statements of co‑accused and that no incriminating …

Kundan Kumar @ Vishal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Kundan Kumar was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 137, 140(3), 140(1), 103(1) and 61(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act and has been in custody since 20 July 2025. The FIR alleges that the informant’s son was summoned from his house by co‑accused persons and that …

Rajesh Kumar GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The High Court considered two bail applications filed by Kheshari Khan and Rajesh Kumar Gupta in connection with a theft case (Hisua P.S. Case No. 30 of 2025) involving alleged theft of silver ornaments. Both petitioners were not named in the FIR and were arrested based on confessional statements of …

Amit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Amit Kumar was arrested in connection with a case of looting a Scorpio vehicle and charged under Section 309(6) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita. He had been in custody since 25 June 2025 and sought bail, arguing that he had a clean antecedent, the investigation was complete, and there was no risk of …

Kanhaiya Kumar @ Kanhaiya SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Kanhaiya Kumar was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 8 and 20(B)(ii)(c) of the NDPS Act for allegedly possessing 159.33 kg of ganja. He has been in custody since 23 October 2024 and contends that the contraband was actually found in another vehicle, making his implication false. The …

Narmdeshwar TiwariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Narmdeshwar Tiwari was arrested in connection with an excise case alleging illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor, with 2,554 liters seized from an abandoned vehicle. The petitioner contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession and that the seizure list lacked …

Alok KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Alok Kumar, who was not named in the FIR, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137 and 140(3) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and has been in custody since September 4, 2025. The prosecution’s case against him rests solely on a confessional statement of co‑accused Dheeraj …

Sunil MandalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Sunil Mandal, was named in an FIR for a violent incident arising from a land dispute, wherein he and co‑accused allegedly assaulted the informant’s father‑in‑law, causing his death, and damaged property worth Rs 50,000. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail, arguing that the clash …

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, sought confirmation of the provisional bail granted to him in an earlier criminal miscellaneous petition. The court noted an earlier order directing the petitioner’s brother, Krishna Kumar, to undertake payment of Rs. 14,00,000, of which Rs. 3,00,000 had already been …

Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case involving the minor daughter of an informant, alleged to have been abducted for illicit intercourse or marriage. He has been in custody since 28 December 2024 and sought bail, arguing that the allegations were false, the …