GIRISHBHAI DAHYABHAI SHAHversusC.C. JAIN & ANR
2009 INSC 97931 July 2009Appeal(s) allowed
Girishbhai Dahyabhai Shah was prosecuted under Section 16(1)(a)(i) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 for allegedly selling adulterated curd. The sample was taken on 8 April 1988 and the Public Analyst’s report indicating adulteration was filed on 4 May 1988 but was only served to the accused on 17 July 1…
NASIB HUSSAIN SIDDI AND ORS.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT
2011 INSC 71928 September 2011Appeal(s) allowed
In 2003 a police constable attempted to escort two men to the police station; one, Hussain Ibrahim Siddi, grabbed and pushed the constable while his wife and mother intervened verbally. All three were convicted under IPC sections 325, 506(2), 333, 342 and 114 and sentenced to three years, later reduced by the Gujarat H…
BALJINDER SINGH @ BITTUversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2011 INSC 72028 September 2011Appeal(s) allowed
In July 1994, Baljinder Singh and his brother Bhupinder Singh assaulted Kulwinder Singh, the owner of a cart that had inadvertently entered their paddy field, inflicting knife and fist injuries. The trial court convicted Baljinder under IPC sections 326 and 324, sentencing him to four years rigorous imprisonment with a…
JAI BALAJI INDUSTRIES LTD.versusPEC LTD. & ORS.
2009 INSC 120127 October 2009Dismissed
Jai Balaji Industries Ltd. entered into a purchase agreement with a foreign seller for manganese ore and a subsequent High Seas Sale Agreement with PEC Ltd., a government company, which was to act as seller. After the cargo arrived, Jai Balaji tested a small portion, found it sub‑standard and rejected the entire consig…
BANDA CHINNA SUBBARAYUDU & ORS.versusTHAILAM VISHANATHA RAO & ANR.
2009 INSC 120227 October 2009Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants obtained a decree for recovery of money and the decree-holder initiated execution proceedings, resulting in the sale of the appellants' property on 25 November 2003. On the same day a third party obtained a stay of the execution proceedings, which remained in force until 2 December 2004. Because of the s…
A.V. PADMA & ORS.versusR. VENUGOPAL & ORS
2012 INSC 5327 January 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The widowed mother and her two educated daughters of a deceased motor accident victim were awarded compensation, which was later enhanced by the High Court. The insurer deposited the full amount with the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, which ordered a portion to be placed in long‑term fixed deposits despite the claiman…
TAMIL NADU ELECTRICITY BOARDversusM/S RASIPURAM TEXTILE (P) LTD. & ORS.
2008 INSC 133925 November 2008Dismissed
The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board inspected Rasipuram Textile Mills and discovered alleged theft of electrical energy. Under Sections 39(1) and 44(1)(c) of the Electricity Act, 1910, the Board prosecuted the company and its directors. The trial court convicted the directors, but the appellate court set aside those convi…
DEEPA T.HOMAS & ORS.versusMEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA & ORS.
2012 INSC 5125 January 2012Disposed off
The appellants, students admitted to private unaided medical colleges in Kerala for the 2007-08 MBBS batch, challenged their discharge after the Medical Council of India (MCI) found their admissions irregular because they had secured less than 50% marks in the competitive entrance examination, a requirement omitted in …
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusRAKESH KUMAR ARORA & ORS.
2008 INSC 108724 September 2008Appeal(s) allowed
A fatal road accident occurred on 5 February 1997 when a vehicle owned by the respondent was driven by Karan Arora, a 15‑year‑old who did not possess a valid driving licence. The deceased's family claimed compensation from United India Insurance Company, which denied liability on the ground that the driver was unlicens…
S.L. CONSTRUCTION & ANR.versusALAPATI SRINIVASA RAO & ANR.
2008 INSC 121623 October 2008Dismissed
The appellants issued a Rs.2 lakh cheque to the respondents on 22 June 2003, which was presented and dishonoured three times within the six‑month period prescribed by Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Notices were issued after each presentation, but the first notice was not served and the second was withdr…
MAN BAHADURversusSTATE OF H.P.
2008 INSC 108323 September 2008Appeal(s) allowed
Man Bahadur was convicted under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act after a search was conducted without informing him of his statutory right to be searched before a gazetted officer or a magistrate as mandated by Section 50 of the Act. The search memo and other documents failed to show any such c…
SHIV KUMAR MISHRAversusSTATE OF GOA THROUGH HOME SECRETARY
2009 INSC 23623 February 2009Dismissed
Shiv Kumar Mishra was convicted under Section 20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act for possession of 1.31 kg of ganja and sentenced to three years' rigorous imprisonment. He appealed, arguing that the weight should exclude seeds, leaves, and moisture, which would reduce the quantity below the 1 kg threshold for a 'small quanti…
PALWINDER SINGHversusBALWINDER SINGH & ORS.
2008 INSC 119020 October 2008Appeal(s) allowed
The deceased, Darshan Kaur, a dumb (and allegedly deaf) woman, was set on fire on 6 April 2001 and gave two dying declarations identifying the accused. The Sessions Judge refused to discharge the accused under Section 227 of the CrPC, but the High Court, on revision, allowed the discharge, preferring one dying declarat…
REDAUL HUSSAIN KHANversusNATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY
2009 INSC 124819 November 2009Dismissed
The petitioner, Redaul Hussain Khan, was arrested on 31 May 2009 for allegedly sending money to an extremist group later declared an unlawful association under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA). While the investigation was transferred to the National Investigation Agency, the petitioner sought statu…
PANCHI DEVIversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.
2008 INSC 149218 December 2008
Panchi Devi, the widow of a work‑charge employee who died in 1978, claimed a family pension under Rule 22A of the Rajasthan Public Works Department (B&R) Work Charge Employees Service Rules, 1964, which became effective on 17 September 1980 with a sub‑rule (6) applicable from 1 September 1982. The High Court dismissed …
ASHOK KUMAR LINGALAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.
2011 INSC 77118 October 2011Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Ashok Kumar Lingala, obtained a mining lease over land recorded as private patta land, while respondent No.3 (SIMORE) held a lease over adjoining government and forest land. The Director of Mines restrained the appellant’s mining activities on the ground of alleged overlapping, leading to writ petitions …
DISTRICT PROGRAMME CO-OORDINATOR, MAHILA SAMKHYA AND ANR.versusABDUL KAREEM AND ANR.
2008 INSC 105818 September 2008Appeal(s) allowed
Mahila Samkhya, a Karnataka society, hired Abdul Kareem as a driver on a fixed‑term contract that was renewed for the period 1 November 1997 to 31 October 1999. The society terminated his services on 3 July 1998 invoking clause XIV of his appointment letter, alleging misconduct. The Labour Court held the termination il…
THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.versusPREM SARUP
2008 INSC 105918 September 2008Dismissed
Constable Prem Sarup was convicted under Section 170 IPC for an offence in 1974, but the conviction was set aside in 1979 because the principal prosecution witnesses turned hostile. The Punjab Police nevertheless initiated disciplinary proceedings under Rule 16.3(1)(b) of the Punjab Police Rules, 1934, imposing a two‑y…
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARDversusMR. SARATCHANDRAN P. & ANR.
2008 INSC 106018 September 2008Appeal(s) allowed
The Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) maintained two separate services, the General Establishment and the Board Secretariat Service. Two employees of the Secretariat Service, S.G. Rajappan and L. Radhadevi, received out‑of‑turn promotions that were later declared illegal. The senior employee in the General Establis…
SUNITADEVI SINGHAN1A HOSPITAL TRUST AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.
2008 INSC 130717 November 2008Appeal(s) allowed
The Sunita Devi Singhania Hospital Trust, a charitable hospital, imported equipment under Notification 64/88-Cus which exempted it from customs duty provided it reserved 10% of beds for low‑income patients and offered free outpatient treatment to at least 40% of patients. The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate T…
P. VENUGOPALversusMADAN P. SARATHI
2008 INSC 116717 October 2008Dismissed
The appellant was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing two cheques of Rs.60,000 each that were dishonoured. He contested the existence of a creditor‑debtor relationship, the service of statutory notice, and the authenticity of his signature. The trial and appellate courts found that…
NATIONAL FERTILIZERS LTD.versusJAGGA SINGH (DECEASED) THROUGH L.RS.& ANR.
2011 INSC 80115 November 2011Dismissed
In 1983 the Punjab government acquired 29.68 acres of land in Bhatinda for employee housing of National Fertilizers Ltd (NFL) under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The landowners challenged the compensation awarded by the Land Acquisition Collector, leading the Additional District Judge to fix Rs.32.50 per square yard …
MONDRI SREENUversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
2008 INSC 115715 October 2008Dismissed
The appellant, Montri Sreenu, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for murdering his mother‑in‑law, Batta Chandramma. The prosecution relied on the appellant’s confession before a magistrate, extra‑judicial confessions to witnesses, recovery of a stone and stick allegedly used as weapons, and medica…
SHIJI @ PAPPU AND ORS.versusRADHIKA AND ANR.
2011 INSC 79714 November 2011Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants were charged under Sections 354 and 394 IPC for an alleged assault and robbery arising from a land access dispute. While the criminal case was pending, the parties reached an amicable settlement, and the complainant withdrew support for the prosecution. The appellants filed a petition under Section 482 C…
ABDUL REHMAN & ORS.versusK.M. ANEES-UL-HAQ
2011 INSC 79514 November 2011Appeal(s) allowed
Abdul Rehman and co‑accused filed a complaint with the Crime Against Women (CAW) Cell alleging that K.M. Anees‑ul‑Haq had demanded dowry, invoking sections 406 and 34 of the IPC and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. In retaliation, the respondent lodged a complaint under sections 211, 500, 109, 114 and 34 …
RAVINDER RAJversusM/S. COMPETENT MOTORS CO. PVT. LTD. & ANR.
2011 INSC 11510 February 2011Dismissed
Ravinder Raj booked a Maruti car in the mid‑1980s, paid an advance and later paid the full price in February 1989. Before the official billing on 5 April 1989, the government raised excise duty, increasing the car's price by about Rs.6,710, and the dealer asked the buyer to pay the excess amount, which he did under pro…
RASHIDA HAROON KUPURADEversusDIV. MANAGER, ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS.
2010 INSC 848 February 2010Appeal(s) allowed
The deceased workman suffered a heart attack six months after being involved in a vehicular accident. The Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation awarded compensation, which the insurer challenged. The Karnataka High Court set aside the award against the insurer, held that the employer (vehicle owner) was liable despit…
TAMIL NADU WATER SUPPLY & DRAINAGE BOARDversusM/S. SATYANARAYANA BROTHERS PVT. LTD.
2009 INSC 12155 November 2009Disposed off
The Tamil Nadu Water Supply & Drainage Board entered into a contract with M/s. Satyanarayana Brothers Pvt. Ltd. for the Veeranam drinking‑water project. The contractor failed to complete the work within the extended time, leading to arbitration. After several awards and appeals, the Supreme Court found that the sole ar…
CHANDRAN @ MANICHAN @ MANIYANversusSTATE OF KERALA
2011 INSC 2644 April 2011Disposed off
The case involved a massive spurious liquor tragedy in Kerala where 31 people died and many were injured after consuming liquor adulterated with methyl alcohol. The accused, a group of brothers and their associates, were charged under the Abkari Act, particularly Section 57A, for mixing or permitting the mixing of a no…
M/S. JULIEN EDUCATIONAL TRUSTversusSOURENDRA KUMAR ROY & ORS.
2009 INSC 12702 December 2009Appeal(s) allowed
Julien Educational Trust, which runs a school, sought to purchase adjacent land owned by eight co‑sharers for expansion. An oral agreement was reached, draft deeds were prepared and approved by most sellers, but execution was delayed and the sellers later attempted to sell the land to third parties. The Trust filed a s…
MOHAMMED YUSUFversusFAIJ MOHAMMAD & ORS .
2008 INSC 13812 December 2008Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant filed a suit for permanent and temporary injunction in 2002. The respondents, served with summons, repeatedly sought extensions to file their written statement under Order 8 Rule 10 of the CPC, but the trial court rejected their application and set a date for recording evidence. The respondents filed a re…
THOTA VENKATESWARLUversusSTATE OF A.P. TR. PRINCL. SEC. & ANR.
2011 INSC 6342 September 2011Disposed off
The petitioner, Thota Venkateswarlu, married Parvathareddy Suneetha in India and later moved with her to Botswana, where she alleged cruelty and dowry demands. A complaint was lodged in India invoking IPC sections 498‑A and 506 (alleged to have occurred abroad) and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4 (alleged to hav…
ANIL KUMAR JAINversusMAYA JAIN
2009 INSC 11011 September 2009Appeal(s) allowed
Anil Kumar Jain and Maya Jain, married in 1985, filed a joint petition for mutual divorce under Section 13‑B of the Hindu Marriage Act in 2004. After the statutory six‑month period, the wife withdrew her consent, stating she did not want the marriage dissolved, leading the trial court and the High Court to dismiss the …