X ETC.versusRAJESH KUMAR & ORS.
2025 INSC 57923 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined whether the Kerala High Court erred in quashing five FIRs filed under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act against a computer teacher accused of inappropriate conduct with female students. The allegations included holding students' hands while using a mouse, asking inva…
NAEEM BANO ALIAS GAINDOversusMOHAMMAD RAHEES & ANR.
2024 INSC 100022 November 2024Disposed off
The appellant landlord sought relief against a tenant's revision petition under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, contending that the notice of ejectment issued on 24 July 2015 was valid. The dispute centered on whether the Uttar Pradesh State amendment of 1954, which changed the notice period from fif…
RAVI AGRAWALversusUNION OF INDIA & ANOTHER
2024 INSC 64820 August 2024Disposed off
Ravi Agrawal filed a writ petition seeking retrospective application of the Finance Act, 2022 amendment to section 80DD of the Income Tax Act, which allows a subscriber to discontinue payments to a Jeevan Adhar scheme upon attaining the age of 60 and to use the accumulated benefit. He argued that the amendment should a…
SATENDER KUMAR ANTILversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ANR.
2025 INSC 90916 July 2025Dismissed
The State of Haryana filed an application seeking modification of a Supreme Court order that required police to serve notices under Section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, only through the mode prescribed in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and not via electronic means such as WhatsApp. …
JANSHRUTI (PEOPLE’S VOICE)versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2025 INSC 53615 April 2025Dismissed
The petitioners, Janshruti (People’s Voice), filed a writ under Article 32 seeking gender‑neutral guidelines for domestic violence complaints and a declaration that Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code (now Section 84 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita) is unconstitutional. The Court examined whether the provision violate…
AMAR SARDARversusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL
2024 INSC 104012 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed
Amar Sardar was convicted by a Fast Track Court for offences under Sections 376, 511 and 354 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment. He appealed to the Calcutta High Court, which upheld the conviction and sentence. The appellant contended that the High Court had merely reiterated the trial cour…
SUREKHA DOMAJI BELEversusEXECUTIVE ENGINEER, TESTING DIVISION, MSEDCL
2026 INSC 63911 June 2026Case Partly allowed
Surekha Domaji Bele, an Upper Division Clerk with over two decades of service at MSEDCL, was suspended in 2006 for alleged indiscipline and related misconduct. A domestic enquiry was held but later declared unfair, leading to a de novo adjudication before the Labour Court where misconduct was proved. The employer dismi…
BRITISH MOTOR CAR COMPANY (1939) LTD.versusM/S HINDUSTAN COMMERCIAL BANK LTD. SINCE HAS BEEN MERGED INTO PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ANR.
2026 INSC 6719 July 2026Appeal(s) allowed
British Motor Car Company (1939) Ltd., the landlord, leased premises to Hindustan Commercial Bank (HCB). In 1986 HCB was amalgamated into Punjab National Bank (PNB) under a scheme framed by the RBI pursuant to Section 45 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, causing HCB to cease to exist and its tenancy rights to vest i…
SRI PRASANTA KUMAR PAL & ORSversusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS
2025 INSC 7838 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
Iswar Chandra Pal executed a registered gift deed on 7 December 1967 transferring 20.88½ acres to his three sons and three daughters, which was entered in revenue records on 26 May 1969. After the land reforms, 8.80 acres of his remaining holdings were declared surplus and vested in the State. Following the 2nd and 3rd…
TUHIN KUMAR BISWAS @ BUMBAversusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL
2025 INSC 13732 December 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Tuhin Kumar Biswas, was charged under IPC sections 341, 354C and 506 for allegedly restraining a complainant and voyeuristically photographing her when she attempted to enter a disputed property. The complainant claimed intimidation and intrusion of privacy, while the appellant argued that he was enforci…
NEERAJ GUPTAversusPARDEEP KUMAR BANSAL & ORS.
2026 INSC 6601 July 2026Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Neeraj Gupta filed a private complaint alleging that his father died after an altercation with the respondents, leading to a criminal proceeding under sections 302 IPC. The complaint was taken up by a Judicial Magistrate First Class under Section 156(3) CrPC, and the magistrate recorded some pre‑charge ev…
KRISHNA KUMAR OJHA & ORS.versusJITENDRA CHAUDHARY & ORS.
2026 INSC 6621 July 2026Dismissed
The appellants, heirs of the original plaintiffs in a partition suit, challenged a compromise decree entered on 22 February 1994 that purportedly settled the suit but was signed without the consent of Defendant No.5, Chaturbhuj Chaudhary. The lower courts had set aside the decree on grounds of fraud and lack of signatu…
SHAURYA SUNIL KUMAR SINGHversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
2026 INSC 6661 July 2026Dismissed
The appellant, Shaurya Sunil Kumar Singh, was arrested in connection with a cyber‑fraud case involving a mule company and was charged under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Prevention of Corruption Act and the IT Act. After being remanded, the investigating agency filed a charge‑sheet on 2 September 2025, but failed to…
PARVEEN KUMAR @ PARVEEN CHAUHANversusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.
2026 INSC 6671 July 2026Appeal(s) allowed
Parveen Kumar was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment in 2009. In 2022 he applied for remission under the 2002 Haryana remission policy, which required the Governor’s approval under Article 161 of the Constitution, but his application was rejected on the ground that the later 2008 policy, issued unde…