Created by Fuzzy Cloud

PURNENDU SINGH

872 judgments · newest first · showing 401–600

Rishu Kumar @ Rishu RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rishu Kumar, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 74, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, alleging assault on the informant's relatives. The District Court had rejected his anticipatory bail on the ground that he allegedly …

Faraz AhmadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Faraz Ahmad, the husband, was charged under Section 85 of the BNS and Section 3(5) of the Dowry Prohibition Act for allegedly torturing his wife over dowry demands. He applied for pre‑arrest bail, contending that the allegations were false and that the matter was a private matrimonial dispute. Both …

Aslam AlamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Aslam Alam, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 74, 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act (BNS), alleging that he acted in self‑defence during a fight with the informant and his wife. The State opposed the …

Ajit Rai @ Bhulani RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajit Rai, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 110, 303(2), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the BNS, alleging that he was falsely implicated in an assault on an informant and his son. The FIR alleges that the petitioner and co‑accused assaulted the …

Mina Devi @ Heena DeviversusThe State of Bihar

CONSIGNED

Mina Devi and Ankit Raj Singh filed a modification petition in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from PS Daudpur, Saran. The petition sought relief against the State of Bihar. The court examined whether the petition could proceed in view of the bar imposed by Section 403 of the Bihar Negotiable …

Sanjeet SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Sanjeet Sah applied to the Patna High Court for a modification of the order dated 07‑03‑2025 that required him to surrender and furnish a bail bond before the District Court. The petitioner sought a further extension of time, citing reasons and supporting an affidavit. The Court examined …

Monu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

CONSIGNED

Monu Kumar filed a modification application seeking to avail an appropriate legal remedy, contending that Section 403 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) imposes a bar on his relief. The petitioner, represented by Mr. Rakesh Bihari Singh, argued that the bar should not preclude his …

Rinki DeviversusThe State of Bihar

CONSIGNED

Petitioner Rinki Devi filed a modification application seeking to avail a legal remedy despite a statutory bar under Section 403 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). The State of Bihar opposed the application. Counsel for the petitioner argued that the bar should not preclude the remedy …

Satya Narayan ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three retired employees of S.K. Mahila College, Begusarai, filed a writ petition seeking fixation of pension, retiral benefits and ACP/MACP from the date of their appointment, alleging mis‑calculation and non‑compliance with Government Circular No. 169 dated 28‑01‑2013. The State of …

NANNKU @ NANKU SAHversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ALLOWED

The appellants challenged their conviction under IPC sections 323 and 34 for voluntarily causing hurt, arguing that the trial court failed to properly assess the evidence and that key witnesses – the investigating officer and the medical officer – were not examined. The prosecution’s case was based …

Bipin Yadav and Ors.versusThe State Of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants Bipin Yadav and Umesh Yadav were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhagalpur, for attempt to murder (IPC s.307) in conjunction with common intention (IPC s.34) and, in Umesh's case, for unlawful possession of a firearm (Arms Act s.27). They appealed under CrPC s.374(2), …

Nazrana KhanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Nazrana Khan filed a writ petition seeking an inquiry into alleged fraudulent registration and manipulation of her land records by state officials and private respondents, claiming she was defrauded of Rs.70 lakh. The land in question is situated in Biharsharif Circle, Mauza Amarpur. The High Court …

Basdeo ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Basdeo Chaudhary, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Bihar and its officials to produce records of a purported land acquisition of his raiyati land (Tauzi No. 3296) and, if no acquisition had been effected, to initiate proceedings under the Right to Fair …

Mandal BaskiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mandal Baski filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 29‑11‑2025 of the District Magistrate‑cum‑Collector of Kishanganj that confirmed a registered sale deed of land settled in his father's favour. The petitioner alleged that the confirmation violated Section 27(3) of the Bihar Land Reforms …

Sundarwati DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, heirs of a deceased landowner, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to set aside a letter that allegedly misreported the Minimum Valuation Report (MVR) for land acquisition for a road widening project, and to award compensation calculated at twice the …

Md. Mojammil Hussain @ Mojammil HussainversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Mojammil Hussain, a 20‑year‑old, was charged under Sections 352 and 351(3) of the BNS and Section 67B of the Information Technology Act for allegedly attempting to make obscene photographs and videos of a minor girl viral and for harassing her by phone calls. He pleaded that no …

Sujit Singh @ Sujit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, six individuals from Bishunpura village, were implicated in a FIR (Case No. 746/2024) alleging that they attempted to kill an informant and her family, assaulting them and causing injuries. They sought pre‑arrest bail, claiming innocence and that the allegations stemmed from a land …

Arun kumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Arun Kumar was arrested in connection with a rape and alleged abortion case (Mahila PS Case No. 62 of 2025) under Sections 127(1), 115(2), 69, 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act. He claimed the sexual relationship with the complainant was consensual and that both parties were …

Babul Yadav @ Babul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Babul Yadav, was charged under multiple sections of the Bihar Non‑Statutory (BNS) for allegedly participating in an unlawful assembly that entered an informant's agricultural land, destroyed crops and demanded a Rs 10 lakh extortion. The petitioner contended that he is the lawful …

Guddu PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Pandey and Manoj Pandey were arrested in connection with a land‑related assault case (PS‑423/2024) alleging offences under several sections of the Bihar Non‑Specific (BNS) Act. The petitioners sought pre‑arrest bail, arguing that the dispute was civil in nature and that the injuries were …

Kishori PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, Kishori Paswan and Sharwan Kumar, sought pre‑arrest bail in a case (Chakia P.S. Case No. 186 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 447, 307, 341, 323, 354, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the IPC. The FIR alleged that the accused, with intent to kill, assaulted the informant and …

Binod Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Binod Kumar Singh, Shila Singh and Rajeev Ranjan, filed a modification petition in a criminal appeal arising from case No. 356 of 2024. The petition sought relief invoking Section 403 of the BNSS. The State of Bihar and Ravi Kumar were the respondents opposing the petition. The …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manish Kumar was charged under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 85, 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act for allegedly torturing an informant over dowry demands. He applied for pre‑arrest bail, arguing that mediation with the complainant (Rani Kumari) had failed …

Akhilesh Kumar @ Akhilesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Akhilesh Kumar, filed an application seeking modification of an earlier order dated 16-10-2025 which had extended his time to surrender before the District Court. He submitted reasons and an affidavit supporting a further extension. The Court examined the justification provided and …

Jitendra Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar,

CONSIGNED

Petitioner Jitendra Kumar Singh filed a contempt petition against the State of Bihar and officials of the Water Resources Department, alleging non‑compliance with a prior order. The respondents contended that the contempt order had been complied with because the required amount was sanctioned and …

Harendra KumarversusThe Union of India

DISPOSED

Harendra Kumar filed a contempt petition against the Union of India and officials of the Bihar State Co-operative Marketing Union Ltd., alleging non‑compliance with an order dated 13 July 2023 concerning payment of gratuity and leave encashment. The respondents filed a show‑cause memorandum …

Mahendra Prasad SahversusSri Amir Subhani

CONSIGNED

The petitioners, three individuals from Purnea, filed a contempt petition alleging that the Government of Bihar had not made the full payment of their General Provident Fund (GPF) as directed by the Court. They sought liberty to file a fresh representation for the release of the pending amount. The …

Dhanjay Rai @ Dhananjay RoyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dhanjay Rai, applied to the Patna High Court seeking a further extension of the time granted to surrender before the learned District Court, modifying the earlier order dated 24‑09‑2025. The court examined the reasons and affidavit submitted with the modification application. Finding …

Noor AlamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Noor Alam appealed to the Patna High Court under Section 14(A)(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the rejection of his pre‑arrest bail. The FIR alleged that he, along with family members, assaulted an informant and used caste‑based slurs in public after a dispute over a tractor. …

Goutam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The appellants Goutam Kumar and Bittu Kumar appealed under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST Act against the refusal of anticipatory bail by the Exclusive Special Judge. The FIR alleged that they were part of a mob that assaulted the informant's daughter and later the informant, using caste-based insults …

Suraj Kumar @ Suraj Kumar BarhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Suraj Kumar Barhi, a 20‑year‑old, was charged with kidnapping the minor daughter of an informant under several sections of the BNS and later under Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act. He applied for pre‑arrest bail, arguing that the charge‑sheet was already filed, there was no evidence of tampering, …

Amit Kumar DubeyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Amit Kumar Dubey, was arrested in a dowry‑related assault case filed under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 85 and 3(5) of the BNS and D.P. Acts, alleging that he brutally assaulted his wife, the daughter of Bindu Devi, and evicted her from their matrimonial home. He applied for pre‑arrest …

Dharmendra Kumar HimanshuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar Himanshu, sought pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 420, 467 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code alleging illegal construction of a fodder‑manufacturing unit on government land under the Mukhya Mantri Udyami Yojana. He contended that the scheme’s terms …

Diwakar Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Diwakar Kumar Singh, sought protection from arrest in a criminal case filed under Sections 406 and 506 of the IPC concerning an alleged fraudulent land sale. He contended that the dispute was essentially civil, involving breach of a contractual agreement and non‑payment of cheques, …

Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case alleging dowry‑related torture under Sections 85 and 3(5) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court noted that the dispute is essentially a private matrimonial conflict rather than a societal …

Gita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Gita Devi, Ugan Manjhi, Kishori Manjhi and Sabo Devi, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 118(2), 109 and 35 of the BNS for allegedly assaulting an informant. They claimed innocence, stating that the matter was a case‑and‑counter‑case …

Balkrishna Mehta @ Balkrishna MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Balkrishna Mehta, sought anticipatory bail in a case alleging misappropriation of public funds under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that during his tenure as Mukhiya of Gram Panchayat Barhouna, irregularities and embezzlement occurred in various …

Dheeraj Paswan @ Dheeraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, three Paswan brothers from Ishara village, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 189(2), 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 352, 351(3) and 109(1) of the Bihar Penal Code, alleging they assaulted the informant's husband and a person named Vivek Kumar over a dispute …

Abhay Kumar Yadav @ Tufani Yadav @ Abhay Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners sought pre‑arrest bail in a case involving alleged firing on an informant and his family over a land dispute. The FIR alleged that petitioners 1 and 2, along with a co‑accused, indiscriminately fired, causing grievous injuries, while petitioner 3 allegedly assaulted the informant's …

Raj Kumar Gupta @ Raj Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, Raj Kumar Gupta and his wife Savitri Devi, parents of alleged offender Gopal Gupta, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case involving alleged sexual exploitation of a minor, false promise of marriage, and alleged assault by the parents. The FIR charges offences under Sections 64, …

Munna Kumar @ ChhotakuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, Munna Kumar and Ram Babu Sah, were charged under Sections 109, 118(2), 3(5) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly opening fire on an informant, causing grievous abdominal and chest injuries. They claimed innocence, arguing that the case was fabricated due to a …

Chhotu Tiwari @ Alok Tiwari @ Alok Kumar TiwariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The appellant, Chhotu Tiwari, aged 19, was charged under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for assaulting an informant and allegedly using caste‑based slurs. The trial court denied his pre‑arrest bail, prompting an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the SC/ST Act. The prosecution alleged that …

Raj Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The appellants, seven individuals from Malda village, were charged under the SC/ST (POA) Act and several sections of the Bihar Penal Code for allegedly entering the informant's house, assaulting him and using caste slurs. The appellants contended that the FIR was filed in retaliation for an …

Gaurav KumarversusThe State of Bihar through the Special P.P. SC and ST Act

DISPOSED

Gaurav Kumar appealed to the Patna High Court against the Special Judge's refusal to grant pre‑arrest bail under the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The FIR alleged that the accused assaulted the informant at Bhulan Bigha with an iron rod and insulted him by …

Vicky KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vicky Kumar appealed against the rejection of his pre‑arrest bail under Section 14(A)(2) of the SC/ST Act. The FIR alleged assault on a police party, including a constable of a scheduled caste, but did not name the appellant; his name emerged only from a co‑accused’s confessional statement. The …

Ram Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The appellants, Ram Kumar Sah and his family members, were charged under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant and using caste-based insults at the informant's doorstep. The …

Saurabh Sunny @ Saurabh Kumar @ Saurabh SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The appellant, Saurabh Sunny, was charged under several IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged dowry‑related physical and mental torture of his wife. The trial court denied his pre‑arrest bail, prompting an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the SC/ST Act. The Patna High …

Pankaj Kumar Sinha @ Pankaj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Pankaj Kumar Sinha appealed against the rejection of his pre‑arrest bail under the SC/ST Act, alleging that he, as an LIC agent, misappropriated Rs 23 lakh belonging to the complainant. The trial court had taken cognizance of offences under IPC sections 420 and 324 and Section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST …

Jitendra Yadav @ Jitendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The appellants, five accused persons belonging to a Scheduled Caste, appealed against the rejection of their pre‑arrest bail petition filed under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The FIR alleged that they, along with other accused, …

Jay Shiv RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The appellants appealed under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the lower court's refusal to grant them pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 96, 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act and Sections 3(1)(r)(s) of …

Naga Kahar @ Suraj Kumar PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The appellants, three brothers from Rohtas, were charged under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code and Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for allegedly assaulting and abusing an informant by using his caste name. They …

Manik @ Manik ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The appellants, Manik Choudhary and Shivam Kumar, were charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant and snatching money, with a claim that they used caste‑based abusive language. The appellants …

Chandan PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Chandan Paswan, a 19‑year‑old student, was implicated in a dacoity case (Lakhnaur PS Case No.31 of 2025) under Sections 331(4), 305, 310(2) and 311 of the BNS. He was not named in the FIR; his name appeared only in a confessional statement of co‑accused Ganesh Yadav, which the petitioner argued has …

Mithlesh Ray @ Mithilesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Mithlesh Ray and Hari Kishor Ray, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case (Bachhwara P.S. Case No. 337 of 2024) involving multiple offences under the BNS, including assault, robbery and rioting. The FIR alleged that they, along with others, entered the informant's house armed, …

Dabloo @ Dablu @ Dabba @ Nishant KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dabloo, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a 2015 case registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged robbery of a tractor and cash. The FIR did not specify the tractor’s registration number and the accusation was based largely on the co‑accused’s information, raising …

Sandeep AnandversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sandeep Anand, was implicated in a complaint under Section 420 IPC alleging cheating in a land sale where the buyer paid Rs.61,51,000 but the sale deed was not executed and a pending title suit was undisclosed. The petitioner argued that the dispute is essentially civil and sought …

Pratik Rai @ Pratik RajversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Pratik Rai, was implicated in a robbery case (PS Case No. 408 of 2020) for allegedly looting a truck loaded with bananas, an offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. He applied for pre‑arrest bail, contending that he is innocent, that the bananas were not …

Gulam Rabbani @ Gulam RabbaneeversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gulam Rabbani, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the BNS and Section 6 of the POCSO Act, alleging sexual exploitation of the informant's sister under the pretext of marriage. The FIR alleges that the petitioner maintained a sexual …

Ankush KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

An 19‑year‑old petitioner, Ankush Kumar, was accused of kidnapping a minor girl under Sections 96, 352 and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Sale (BNS) Act and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act. The FIR alleged that he, along with two unknown persons, abducted the victim, but the child’s statement …

Lakshman SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, five relatives from Samastipur, were charged under Sections 316(2), 318(4) and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act for allegedly cheating the informant by taking ₹10 lakh for a marriage that was later revealed to be fraudulent. They applied for pre‑arrest bail, arguing that …

Dilkhus Kumar @ DilwaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dilkhus Kumar, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a murder case registered under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The only incriminating material against him was a confessional statement of co‑accused Sajan Kumar and call‑detail records showing four calls between Sajan’s phone and …

Lalan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, sons of Lalan Singh, were charged under several IPC sections including 307 (attempt to murder) for allegedly assaulting an informant and his family during a land dispute. They claimed the injuries were simple and caused in self‑defence without intent to kill. The State opposed …

Santosh Kumar Yadav @ Santosh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Santosh Kumar Yadav, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109 and 3(5) of the BNS, alleging that he was falsely implicated in an assault on an informant. He asserted that he and the informant are agnates and expressed a desire to settle the …

Akhalesh kumar @ Akhilesh Kumar @ Aklesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Akhalesh Kumar, aged about 21, was charged under Sections 85 and 3(5) of the BNS and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for allegedly torturing the complainant over dowry demands. He claimed that his marriage in 2022 was voidable because he was a minor at the time, and …

Niraj Kumar @ Neeraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Niraj Kumar, aged 23, was arrested in connection with a kidnapping allegation under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the B.N.S., involving the minor daughter of the informant Soni Devi. He contended that a similar allegation when he was a juvenile resulted in his release after a Juvenile …

Seraj Ahmad @ SonuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Seraj Ahmad, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Mahila Police Station (Case No. 66 of 2025) for alleged offences under Sections 64, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the State and the second opposite party were …

Sudhir KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sudhir Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging kidnapping of two minor girls for marriage, under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the B.N.S. The petitioner contended he merely handed the girls over to a third person, Deepak, and had no role in any kidnapping. The victims' statements recorded …

Rahul Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rahul Kumar Singh petitioned for pre‑arrest bail in a case where his wife alleged physical and mental torture for dowry demands, invoking sections of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner claimed innocence and expressed willingness to settle the matrimonial …

Nitu JainversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Nitu Jain filed a writ petition challenging a land acquisition notice issued on 28‑10‑2010 for the NH‑28A project, alleging that her name was omitted from the Gazette and no personal notice was given. She further claimed that compensation under the Right to Fair Compensation and …

Subhash Chandra SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Subhash Chandra Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to rectify a land mutation receipt that remained in his deceased father's name and to have the mutation transferred to his name as the legal heir. He also requested liberty to withdraw the writ and instead file a …

Awdhesh Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Awdhesh Kumar Yadav filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the authorities to measure and demarcate his land in Pachra Nimahi, Sitamarhi, at his cost. He later informed the court that a prior order dated 18‑07‑2024 in B.L.D.R. Case No. 95 of 2022 had already directed the …

Devanand PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Devanand Pandey, alleged that his raiyati land in Bhagalpur district was used for constructing a road under the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana without any acquisition process or compensation, violating his constitutional right to property under Article 300A. He contended that the …

Nirnimesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, who bought a small parcel of land in 1994, challenged acquisition proceedings initiated in 2006 under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, alleging that no notice, possession, or compensation was effected before the 2013 Act came into force. An award was later made in 2025 under the …

Rajeev NayakversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajeev Nayak, filed a writ petition challenging a letter dated 17 October 2023 issued by the Circle Officer, Pandaul, which declared certain parcels of land in Madhubani district as belonging to the Mahatma (MATH) despite earlier revenue records showing the land in the names of the …

Hriday UranwversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Hriday Uranw, filed a writ petition challenging the Collector‑Cum‑District Magistrate’s order dated 27‑03‑2025 which rejected his Settlement Cancellation Appeal concerning land in Khata No. 148, Plot No. 1483. He alleged that the settlement was illegal because the land was allotted …

Tapan Das @ Tapan Kumar DasversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Tapan Das filed a writ petition seeking payment of compensation for land acquired under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, after an award (Prapatra IV) was prepared and the amount communicated. The petitioner …

Paritosh Chand Das @ Pritosh Chand DasversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Paritosh Chand Das filed a writ petition seeking payment of compensation for land acquired under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. An award (Prapatra IV) had been issued under Section 37(2) of the Act, but the District …

Ravishankar ThakurversusState of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Ravishankar Thakur filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the District Land Acquisition Officer (DLAO) to pay fair compensation at commercial rates for his land acquired by the State of Bihar under a perpetual lease. He had already submitted a representation to the DLAO, but …

Moinuddin Ahmed @ Mainuddin AhmadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Moinuddin Ahmed, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus to restrain the State authorities from dispossessing his land in Gopalganj district following a Jamabandi cancellation order dated 02.01.2026. He had already appealed the cancellation before the District …

Alok Kumar PankajversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner Alok Kumar sought a writ of mandamus directing the State authorities to remove an illegal encroachment on his land (Khata No. 860, Plot No. 1487, 42 decimals) and to enforce a prior High Court order restoring possession to him. He alleged that private respondents had forcibly occupied …

Rakesh Narayan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Rakesh Narayan Singh, claimed that his ancestral land of 8.10 bighas was acquired in 1976‑77 for the Gogri‑Narayanpur Embankment under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, but he never received compensation and the relevant records are missing. The State of Bihar argued that compensation …

Devendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Devendra Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking to withdraw a pending modification application. He relied on the bar provision contained in Section 403 of the Bihar Negotiable Security Act, 2023, which corresponds to Section 362 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. …

Lalu Yadav @ Upnandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Lalu Yadav, an 18‑year‑old, filed a modification application in the Patna High Court. He sought to withdraw the application invoking the bar provision under Section 403 of the Bihar Negotiable Security Act, 2023, which mirrors Section 362 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, filed a modification application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding arising from PS Case No. 139 of 2025. He sought to withdraw the application, invoking the bar provision under Section 403 of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments (Security) Act, 2023, which corresponds to …

Mantu RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mantu Rai applied for bail, and the court on 24-12-2025 granted regular bail but erroneously recorded that he had a clean criminal antecedent. The petitioner later discovered that paragraph 4 of the order contained a typographical mistake, as he actually had one prior case (Sonpur P.S. Case No. 377 …

Chandra Bhushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

CONSIGNED

The petitioner, a retired toll clerk, filed a contempt petition alleging that the State of Bihar and its officials had failed to pay his pending General Provident Fund (GPF) amount despite a court order dated 08.05.2023 directing payment and disciplinary action against errant officers. The order …

Ajay RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellant, Ajay Rai, filed a criminal appeal (SJ) No.3040 of 2025 arising from PS case No.782 of 2023 before the High Court of Patna. The appeal sought relief against the State of Bihar and a co-respondent, but the appellant's counsel failed to annex the requisite documents, including the …

Rakesh Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar Singh, filed a modification application seeking an extension of time to surrender before the learned District Court as required by an order dated 16‑10‑2025. The petitioner could not comply within the prescribed period and submitted reasons and an affidavit supporting …

Ambuj Kumar @ Bablu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ambuj Kumar, sought pre‑arrest bail in a case where 120 litres of illicit liquor were seized from an auto‑rickshaw registered in his name. He claimed the vehicle was being used by his brother, Arvind Kumar, who was arrested at the scene, and that he had no knowledge of the liquor or …

Kulwanti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Kulwanti Devi was accused in a FIR for allegedly obtaining benefits under the Pradhan Mantri Awaas Yojana – Gramin by falsely claiming she owned no pucca house, despite possessing two, and for misappropriating Rs. 90,000 of government funds. The petition sought anticipatory bail, asserting she had …

Sima DeviversusThe State Of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, four residents of Pipra village, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging they assaulted an informant and her family. They contended that they were falsely implicated, that any injury caused was …

Saurav Kumar @ Saurav Kumar MandalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Saurav Kumar and Niraj Kumar, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes, 2023, alleging that they were involved in an assault on an informant and his family. The FIR primarily …

Chandan Kumar Ray @ Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Kumar @ BelagversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar Ray, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 20 litres of illicit liquor recovered from a banana orchard behind his house. He contended that the orchard is an open space accessible to anyone and that …

Vivek Kumar PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vivek Kumar Prasad, the owner of a motorcycle from which 15.48 litres of illicit liquor was recovered, applied for pre‑arrest bail under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, was not named in the FIR, and had no knowledge of the liquor …

Ashok YadawversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ashok Yadaw, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 69.120 litres of illicit liquor. The FIR linked him to the crime solely on the basis of a confessional statement made by a co‑accused, …

Chandeshwar RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Chandeshwar Rai applied for pre‑arrest bail after being implicated in a case alleging recovery of 17.28 litres of illicit foreign liquor from his residence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that the case was false, stemming from personal enmity, and that the …

Kripa Sahani @ Kripa Kumar SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Kripa Sahani, a 19‑year‑old, applied for pre‑arrest bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for allegedly transporting 55.8 litres of illicit liquor in a motorcycle registered in his name. He contended that he was not present at the …

Kartik KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Kartik Kumar, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case (Bidupur P.S. Case No.658/2025) alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly transporting 43.74 litres of illicit liquor in a car he owned. He contended that he was not present at the …

Shubhash Ram @ Shubhash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Shubhash Ram, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 700 ml of country‑made liquor in his fodder store. He claimed innocence, stating he was neither involved in the sale nor consumption of …

Raj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Petitioner Raj Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court. During the hearing on 17-02-2026, his counsel sought to withdraw the petition. The court entertained the request and dismissed the petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the case were considered. The …

Mithlesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Mithlesh Kumar, applied for pre‑arrest bail after 29.5 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from a motorcycle registered in his name. He claimed he was falsely implicated because the vehicle was parked in a public area and he had no involvement in liquor trade. The State opposed …

Sikandar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, four individuals from Bhagwanpur, sought pre‑arrest bail in a 2018 case (Fatuha PS No. 314) for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, wherein 100 litres of illicit liquor were seized. They claimed innocence and alleged false implication. The …

Puja KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Puja Kumari and Jitendra Sah sought protection from arrest in a case (PS 414/2025) alleging offences under several sections of the BNS and the IPC, including attempt to murder. They claimed innocence and requested an amicable settlement, invoking the Supreme Court’s decision in Naushey …

Bhola PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Bhola Paswan applied for pre‑arrest bail after being implicated in a case (Birpur P.S. Case No. 267 of 2025) for alleged possession of 17.7 litres of illicit liquor recovered from a bush near his house, alleged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended …

SEEMA DEVI @ SIMA DEVIversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, three women from Juria village, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case (Baheri P.S. Case No. 322/2025) alleging offences under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes (BNS) for an alleged assault motivated by a land dispute. They contended that they were falsely implicated …

Sanoj YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sanoj Yadav, was implicated in an excise case for the alleged recovery of 388.8 litres of illicit liquor from his wheat field, alleged under Sections 30(a) and 38(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that the liquor was seized from an open field accessible to …

Santosh NutversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Santosh Nut, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act where five litres of illicit liquor were allegedly recovered from an open bush. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that the liquor was found in a public area …

Guddu Chaudhary @ Guddu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Guddu Chaudhary, a 27‑year‑old resident of Basahi village, filed a petition for pre‑arrest bail in connection with PS Janta Bazar Case No.304 of 2025, which alleges an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Raushan Raj, argued for release …

Sunil Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sunil Kumar Sah was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 11.54 litres of illicit foreign liquor from his house, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that the case was false, motivated by personal enmity, and that other members of his joint family …

Pujan Paswan @ Pujan PasvanversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

Petitioners Pujan Paswan and Yogendra Paswan applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case where 240 litres of illicit liquor were seized from an open sandbank, alleged under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioners claimed they were falsely implicated and that the …

Sahil Sahani @ Shahi KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Sahil Sahani (Shahi Kumar), applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case where 60 litres of illicit liquor were seized from a motorcycle, alleged to violate Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed innocence and alleged false implication. The State opposed …

Nepali Rai @ Nawalkishore RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nepali Rai, sought pre‑arrest bail in a case (PS 306/2025) alleging possession of 50 litres of illicit liquor under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The FIR stated that the liquor was recovered from an open area behind his house, which the …

Bikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bikash Kumar, sought pre‑arrest bail in an excise case where 2 litres of illicit liquor were seized from a motorcycle he owned but was being driven by his brother. He claimed he had no knowledge of the liquor and that he had a clean criminal record. The State opposed the bail, …

Chhotu @ Satish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chhotu @ Satish Kumar, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 9 litres of illicit foreign liquor recovered from co‑accused Babloo Kumar. The petitioner argued that he was not named in the …

Mostt. Shanti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, two widows, alleged that the Rural Works Department and other local authorities began constructing a village PCC road over their ancestral land in Lavapur Narayan, Vaishali, without following the acquisition procedure prescribed under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency …

Tinkeshwar BhartiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Tinkeshwar Bharti filed a writ petition seeking compensation for 4.2432 decimals of land acquired by the State of Bihar for the Patna Metro Rail project, invoking the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The petitioner …

Prithviraj SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, a group of landowners from Siwan district, filed a writ petition seeking the quashing of a Jamabandi cancellation case and a notice issued under Form‑XVII of the Bihar Mutation Rules, alleging that the Additional Collector had failed to act on their application under Section 9(6) of …

Aniket KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Aniket Kumar filed a writ petition alleging that a public road had been illegally constructed on his land (Khata No.1049, Khesra No.3647) by private respondents 14‑18, creating breach of peace. He sought mandamus directing the State to restrain the construction, enforce Sections 163 and 164 of the …

Darweshwar ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Darweshwar Chaudhary, filed a writ petition seeking quashing of an order dated 25‑08‑2025 issued by the Lok Shikayat Nivaran Adhikari, a mandamus directing respondents not to interfere with his possession, a restraining order against road construction on his Khatiyani land, fresh …

Hare Krishna Pandey @ Hare Krishan PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Hare Krishna Pandey, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Circle Officer, Sonepur, to measure and demarcate his land (Khata No. 846, Khesara No. 1945) and to erect a cemented pillar after demarcation. He had earlier applied on 20‑12‑2025 for the same relief, but the …

Syed Mohammad Faiz UddinversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Syed Mohammad Faiz Uddin, filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an order of the Additional Collector cancelling his jamabandi and also sought mandamus directing the authorities to include the land in his name and to accept land revenue. He claimed the land is his …

Kushmi Devi,versusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, a group of landowners, claimed that they had not received the compensation due for their land (Plot No.2907) acquired under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for an extradosed cable bridge project. The …

Shubham GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Shubham Gupta, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a complaint (Case No. CA‑1507/2022) alleging offences under Sections 420, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The complaint arose from a dispute with the complainant, Krishna Kumar Sinha, and mediation attempts failed because the …

GauravversusThe State of Bihar through the Secretary Dr. Pratima,

WITHDRAWN

Gaurav and Prem Kumar filed a Letters Patent Appeal before the Patna High Court challenging actions of the State of Bihar and its officials. The petitioners, through counsel Mr. Harsh Singh, sought to withdraw the pending application while preserving the right to pursue any appropriate remedy later. …

Sujeet Kumar @ Sujit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Sujeet Kumar, was arrested in September 2024 for alleged possession of a loaded pistol, an offence under Sections 25(1‑B)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. He applied for pre‑arrest bail after being in custody for more than a year and having ten prior criminal cases, three of which relate …

Manoj Kumar Sah @ ManojversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Manoj Kumar Sah applied for regular bail in a case under Sections 21(b), 22 and 23 of the NDPS Act, alleging that his earlier bail application was rejected and he has been in custody for over a year since June 2024. The petitioner argued that the prolonged detention warranted release. The court …

Madan Kumar @ MintuversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Madan Kumar, applied to modify a paragraph in the order dated 02‑12‑2025 which stated that he never willingly desired to appear before the District Court on 17‑12‑2025. The High Court examined whether there was any error of record, arithmetical or typographical mistake, or a …

Aniket Kumar alias Aneeket KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Aniket Kumar filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing various state authorities to complete the measurement and demarcation of his ancestral land under Rule 23(2) of the Bihar Tenancy (Amendment) Rules, 2023. He had deposited the required measurement fee on 14‑04‑2025, but the Circle …

M/s Priyadarshi Resort and Hotel LtdversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Priyadarshi Resort and Hotel Ltd, challenged the cancellation of their Jamabandi (land record) by the Additional Collector on 4 March 2025, which directed the land be re‑recorded in the names of Helios Finance and Helios Corporation. They filed an appeal before the Bihar Land …

Indu DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Indu Devi, the wife of Saheb Yadav, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 363 and 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 8 and 17 of the POCSO Act. The trial was at the stage of final arguments before the Special Judge (POCSO Act) in Siwan. The petitioner argued …

Sudama RaiversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, Sudama Rai, Chanchan Yadav and Chennai Yadav, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case (Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 96/2025) alleging offences under numerous sections of the BNS, the Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act and the Arms Act. The FIR alleges that the petitioners, …

Arjun Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Arjun Kumar Singh, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a complaint case registered under IPC sections 406, 420 and 34. The dispute could not be settled through mediation, as evidenced by a mediator’s report dated 30‑10‑2025. The High Court examined the seriousness of the alleged offences, …

Gopal Sahni @ Gopal Sahni DasversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Gopal Sahni and Shubhkala Devi, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case alleging kidnapping of a minor girl with intent to marry, under Sections 87 and 3(5) of the BNSS. They claimed innocence, stating they are the parents of the main accused, Sachin Kumar, and that the victim herself …

NIRAJ KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Niraj Kumar, was arrested in connection with a FIR alleging that he stabbed three persons, including the informant’s son, causing injuries. He filed a pre‑arrest bail application before the Patna High Court seeking release pending investigation. The offences alleged fall under …

Jaynarayan MishraversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Jaynarayan Mishra, was charged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 316(2), 318(2), 352 and 351(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act, 2023 for allegedly cheating a landowner, failing to execute a sale deed, and assaulting the informant. The petitioner claimed that the dispute had been …

Md. NezamuddinversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Nezamuddin, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a criminal case alleging that he demanded Rs.15 lac as dowry and forced the informant’s father to execute a sale deed of 17 decimal of land in his favour. The FIR charges under Sections 70(1), 61(2), 318(4) and 3(5) of the BNS, while the …

Md. Ashraf Khan @ TinkuversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Ashraf Khan, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 406 and 420/34 IPC alleging he fraudulently obtained Rs.6 lakh by promising a medical college admission for the informant's son. He contended that the matter was essentially a civil monetary dispute and sought an …

Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, five members of the Yadav family, were charged under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code for allegedly obstructing the execution of a court decree, during which police officers were injured. They applied for pre‑arrest bail, claiming innocence and asserting that the only …

Chandrashekhar RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandrashekhar Rai, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case arising from a land‑dispute‑related assault alleged under several sections of the BNS and the IPC. He claimed innocence, a clean record, and expressed willingness to settle the matter amicably through mediation. The State also …

Anoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anoj Kumar, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a complaint alleging offences under Sections 380, 420, 406, 408, 467, 468, 471 and 504 IPC relating to alleged misappropriation of land documents and fraudulent loan. The State opposed the bail, while the petitioner claimed innocence and …

Akash kumar @ Aakash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Akash Kumar, sought pre‑arrest bail in a Mahila Police Station case alleging offences under Sections 85, 318(4), 89, 351(2) of the BNS and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act, stemming from a complaint by a former partner who alleged cruelty and a force‑ful abortion. The petitioner …

Md. Shaukat Ali @ Mohammad Saukat AliversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Md. Shaukat Ali applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes (BNS). During the pendency of the bail application, the petitioner and the informant reached a compromise, documented by a jointly signed petition dated 17‑01‑2026. The court …

Om Prakash Rai @ Om Prakash RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Om Prakash Rai, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under several sections of the BNS. The High Court noted the serious nature of the allegations and the petitioner’s admitted enmity with the informant, and therefore directed that the petitioner may seek regular bail …

Ravi Ranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ravi Ranjan Kumar, a 22‑year‑old, was charged under multiple provisions of the BNS, the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act for alleged sexual offences against the informant's daughter and for using his caste name in public. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS identified the place …

Dabalu Mahaldar @ W MahaldarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, a lessee of a government pond under Patta No. 62 dated 24‑06‑2023, filed a writ petition seeking multiple mandamus orders directing various state authorities to remove illegal encroachments, enforce his lease, and award compensation. He relied on a prior Patna High Court judgment …

Rajkumar Sinha @ Rajkumar PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, a group of landowners from Shankarpur Jhama, claimed that the compensation awarded for their lands acquired for the Salepur‑to‑Rajgir road was undervalued because the Minimum Value Register (MVR) had not been revised since 2023 and a statutory multiplier of two should apply. They …

Ratneshwar MishraversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Ratneshwar Mishra and Arjun Mishra, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus to restrain the State of Bihar and its revenue officials from constructing on, disturbing possession of, or improperly acquiring their purchased land in Naruar, Madhubani. They also requested liberty to file …

Kishun ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

A large group of petitioners, residents of Amwan‑Durgapur in Bodh Gaya, filed a writ petition seeking protection from alleged threats of dispossession and demolition of their houses on several revenue plots. They claimed to be in possession of the land, supported by rent receipts and title deeds, …

Shri Prakash ChandraversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three brothers claiming ancestral ownership of land in Mauja‑Barwa, Khata No‑213, alleged that the State of Bihar and its officials had encroached upon their property. They filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the respondents to pay compensation under the Land …

Radha Devi @ Prabha DeviversusThe State of Bihar

CONSIGNED

Petitioners Radha Devi and Raju Paswan filed a writ petition seeking a court order directing the District Magistrate to investigate their claim of ownership over a plot of land allegedly purchased by oral agreement in 1988, to restore possession, and to initiate civil and criminal action against …

Ghanshyam JhaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ghanshyam Jha, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to restore possession of his Khatiani raiyati land, which he alleges was illegally occupied by the Gram Panchayat Mukhiya and villagers who constructed an RCC road on the land without consent. He …

Ajit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner purchased land and applied for mutation of title, but the Circle Officer rejected the application by e‑communication without giving notice or a hearing, citing vague objections from villagers and a claim that the land belongs to a Math. The petitioner sought certiorari to quash the …

Rambilash Jha alias Ram Bilash JhaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rambilash Jha, filed a writ petition seeking certiorari to quash three orders dated 11 September 2025, 23 January 2024 and 6 March 2018 issued respectively by the Bihar Land Tribunal, the Commissioner of Tirhut Division and the Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Sitamarhi. The …

Devki SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, four brothers, claimed ownership of land purchased in 1929 and held a Jamabandi since 1957, which was mutated to their names in 1985. In 2025 a private respondent filed a Jamabandi cancellation case, and the Additional Collector cancelled the Jamabandi, relying on a 1931 deed. The …

Shrikant KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Shrikant Kumar claimed ownership of land based on a 1973 exchange deed, but a partition suit (Title Suit No. 483 of 1989) had been filed by the original landholder, resulting in Jamabandi No. 608 being in the original holder’s name. The Deputy Collector Land Reforms (DCLR) issued an order on …

Jayant Singh @ Jayant KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, brothers Jayant, Ajit and Chandan Kumar, claimed ownership of a 2 2/3 dismil plot in Masaurha based on a 1979 sale deed, while respondent Nand Kishore Sharma asserted a competing title. The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms (DCLR), acting under the Bihar Land Disputes Resolution Act, …

Md. AmruddinversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, accused of offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) of the IPC for an alleged fraudulent land transaction, applied for pre‑arrest bail, claiming the matter is a civil dispute and that the sale deed was executed voluntarily. The State also expressed willingness for an …

Saurav KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Saurav Kumar and Kundan Kumar, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case involving multiple IPC offences and a violation of the Arms Act. Their earlier bail order was set aside because the criminal antecedent details were incorrect. They submitted a corrected application, asserting that …

Sabitri DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sabitri Devi, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a criminal case (PS‑Case No. 340/2024) alleging offences under Sections 80(2), 238 and 3(5) of the BNS. The High Court noted that a co‑accused had been acquitted by the Sessions Court in order 383 of 2025. Considering the FIR allegations …

Subodh Singh @ Subodh Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Subodh Singh and Sudhanshu Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking a further extension of the time granted to them to surrender before the learned District Court. An earlier order dated 26‑11‑2025 had already extended the surrender deadline. The petitioners …

Rinku Kumar @ Rikku KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rinku Kumar filed a modification application in a criminal miscellaneous case. He sought to withdraw the application, invoking the bar under Section 403 of the B.N.S.S., 2023, which corresponds to Section 362 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The learned counsel argued that the bar …

Harikishor MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Harikishor Mukhiya and family members, filed an application seeking a further extension of the time granted to them to surrender before the learned District Court. The original order dated 16 October 2025 had already extended the surrender deadline, but the petitioners argued that …

Md. Amem AlamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md Amem Alam, was charged under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act for allegedly receiving Rs.25 lakh from the informant for a flat registration that never occurred. He claimed innocence and sought pre‑arrest bail, arguing that the dispute was …

Laxman Kumar @ Lakshman Kumar @ LaxmanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Laxman Kumar, applied to the Patna High Court seeking modification of an earlier order dated 08-10-2025 that required him to surrender and furnish a bail bond before the District Court. He requested a further extension of time to comply with the surrender requirement. The Court …

Pradeep SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pradeep Sahani applied to the Patna High Court seeking a further extension of time to surrender before the District Court, alleging that the bail bond was not accepted because the District Transport Officer and Superintendent of Police failed to produce a required vehicle report. The High …

Vinaykant SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Vinaykant Sahani, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court. During the hearing, his counsel sought to withdraw the petition. The court entertained the request and dismissed the petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the case were examined. The …

Dr Kameshwar PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

CONSIGNED

Dr. Kameshwar Prasad filed a contempt petition before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and B.N. Mandal University. The petition was heard on 6 February 2026 before Justice Purnendu Singh. After considering the show‑cause notices filed by the State, the Court found that the order …

Nitish Kumar @ Ghocha Kumar @ GhochaversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered as Bhadwar P.S. Case No. 16 of 2025, alleging offences under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The FIR alleges that the petitioner, …

Krishna ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Krishna Chaudhary, applied to the Patna High Court seeking a modification of the earlier order dated 23 September 2025 which had granted an extension of time to surrender before the learned District Court. The petitioner argued that further time was required, supported by an …

Bipin Kumar @ Vipin LalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bipin Kumar, was directed by the Patna High Court to surrender before the learned District Court by 24 September 2025. He was unable to do so and filed a modification application seeking an extension of time. The court examined the reasons set out in the application and accompanying …

Dr. Smt. Renu SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Dr. Renu Sah, Chandan Kumar and Sushil Rai, filed a petition in the Patna High Court seeking restoration of Criminal Miscellaneous No. 69226 of 2018, which had been dismissed for non‑prosecution on 24 November 2025. The respondents were the State of Bihar and Upendra Nath Tiwary. …

Binod SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Binod Singh, filed a petition seeking further modification of an earlier order dated 17‑09‑2025 that had extended his time to surrender before the District Court. The petitioner submitted reasons and an affidavit supporting the need for additional time. The High Court examined the …

Akbar AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Akbar Ansari, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking further extension of time to surrender before the learned District Court, modifying an earlier order dated 15 May 2025. The High Court examined the reasons provided in the petitioner's affidavit and the modification …

Bajo YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Bajo Yadav filed a writ petition seeking to quash a letter issued by the Circle Officer directing maintenance of law and order over his ancestral land and to obtain a status‑quo direction pending the outcome of Title Suit No.110/2017. He alleged that local authorities, in collusion with …

Manoranjan Singh @ Manoranjan PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoranjan Singh filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State officials to pass an order on his Mutation Revision Application No.46/2024-25, which has been pending since 3 September 2024, and a certiorari to set aside an order dated 1 August 2024 passed by the District Court of Land …

Ishwar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three landowners from Village Jota, Gaya, filed a writ petition in the Patna High Court seeking the removal of a waste processing unit constructed on their raiyati land and compensation for alleged illegal retention of the land by various state authorities since 2023. They alleged …

Manirul Islam @ Md. Manirul HaqueversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Manirul Islam, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the Sub Divisional Officer to provide police for land measurement and the Circle Officer to measure his purchased land as per a 1997 deed. The petition also cited several orders dated 2015, 2018, and 2019 that had not …

Diwakar Kumar GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Diwakar Kumar Gupta filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court challenging a decision of the State of Bihar and its revenue officials. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the required genealogical records were not placed on record, rendering the petition incomplete. The court directed …

Ram Bachan RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, a large group of individuals, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 29‑01‑2020 passed by the Member (Administrative) of the Bihar Land Tribunal, which dismissed their case and affirmed earlier mutation orders. They contended that the Member, an IAS officer, sat alone …

Ram Kishun YadavversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioners, Ram Kishun Yadav and others, filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court challenging actions of the State of Bihar and its officials. During the hearing on 5 February 2026, the petitioners' counsel sought permission to withdraw the writ petition, citing developments that …

Vimlesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, son of a landowner whose land was acquired in 2008 for the Bagmati Pariyojna embankment, filed a writ of mandamus seeking payment of compensation that had not been received. The petitioner alleged that despite an award notice issued in 2008, no action was taken by the Special Land …

Khalilur RahmanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Khalilur Rahman, claimed ownership of a 0.14‑decimal land parcel in Katihar, purchased by a registered deed in 1965 and recorded in the revenue records. He alleged that neighbouring occupants (respondents 9‑27) were unlawfully disturbing his peaceful possession and that various state …

Md. Janul Haque @ Md. Jainul HaqueversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, eleven accused persons, were arrested in connection with a case registered under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes and the Indian Penal Code for assaulting an informant, his wife and brother and outraging the wife’s modesty. They claimed innocence and sought bail, …

Md. RajaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Raja, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the Bihar Non‑Compulsory Statutes and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR alleges that Raja and his uncle Md. Kajim abused persons performing Namaj and subsequently …

Ranjan PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ranjan Paswan applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case where the FIR alleged that he, along with others, assaulted an informant with a common intention to kill and stole Rs.5,000. The petitioner claimed the informant was his relative and that a land dispute led to a fight in self‑defence, asserting …

Sunny Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sunny Kumar Yadav applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case involving alleged dowry‑related violence and other offences under the IPC, Dowry Prohibition Act, SC/ST (POA) Act and POCSO Act. The court observed that the dispute is essentially a private matrimonial conflict rather than a societal offence …

Aldip Singh @ Aldip Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Aldip Singh, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 316(2), 318(4) and 351(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act, alleging that he merely facilitated a visa for the informant after receiving Rs. 2,00,000, and that the visa turned out to be a tourist visa …

Ramadhar RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramadhar Ram, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a complaint alleging cheating, criminal breach of trust and forgery under IPC sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and NI Act section 138. The petitioner claimed innocence and sought settlement through mediation, while the State and …

Habib @ HabeebullahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Habib @ Habeebullah, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case (Kachna PS Case No. 59/2025) involving offences under several sections of the BNS, alleging that a large group of accused created a ruckus at the police station and assaulted police to secure the release of another detainee. …

Md. Samru @ SamruversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Md. Samru, Md. Asif and Md. Pocha, were named in an FIR for allegedly creating a ruckus at a police station, assaulting police personnel and pressurising them to release a detainee, along with 50‑60 unknown persons. They contended that the FIR did not specifically allege any overt …

Pallu Ray @ Raghuveer KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, a co‑villager, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes (BNS) for alleged ransom demand, robbery and assault. The petition argued that the allegations against him were vague and that the specific charge of threatening …

Md. Danish Husain @ Md. DanisversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioners, Md. Danish Husain and Md. Imran, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous case. During the hearing, the petitioners, through counsel, expressed their desire to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The learned counsel for …