Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
3365 judgments · newest first · showing 3001–3200
The petitioner, S. Kumar, a Deputy Secretary in the Bihar Health Department, was sanctioned for prosecution under sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B IPC for allegedly colluding to stay a mutation proceeding in favour of Kumar Gyanendra. The petitioner argued that the stay order dated 27‑06‑2013 …
The petitioners, members of the Mahaldar family, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (PS Case No. 295 of 2018) involving offences under Sections 147, 149, 323, 379, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that they assaulted the victim in a …
The petitioner, Sunil Prasad, was accused of kidnapping under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita in Gidha Police Station Case No. 154 of 2024. He had earlier been granted anticipatory bail in a separate kidnapping case (Ara Nawada P.S. Case No. 465 of 2024). The petitioner, now …
Majharool Haque, a medicine shop owner, was implicated in a complaint alleging violations of several provisions of the Drugs and Cosmetic Act, 1940 and Section 420 of the IPC for operating without a valid drug licence. The petitioner produced a licence valid from 2005 to 2010 and a receipt of …
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar Pandey, filed an application for bail fearing arrest in connection with a case registered under Sections 126(2), 109(20) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He was alleged to have filed a complaint against the victim, but the injury …
The petitioner, Mukesh Kumar Singh, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Sonbarsa Raj Case No. 81 of 2024) alleging offences under Sections 406, 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for defalcating approximately Rs. 50 lakh of PACS funds. He claimed innocence, stating he was …
The petitioners, Mayank Mohan and Shekhar Pandey, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 108 and 3(5) of the BNS for allegedly assaulting and threatening a deceased person, leading to his suicide. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners' actions caused the …
The petitioner, Harkesh Bharti, sought relief from anticipated arrest in a case (Bhitaha P.S. Case No. 74 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic and Sexual Offences (BNS) Act, 2023 and the POCSO Act, including abduction of a minor. The prosecution alleged that the …
The petitioner, Upendra Prasad Yadav, sought relief fearing arrest in a complaint (No. 116 of 2023) alleging offences under IPC sections 420, 406, 384 and 386 for allegedly taking Rs. 15 lakh in a failed marriage arrangement. He claimed innocence, stating he was falsely implicated and is a …
The petitioner, Akash Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Case No. 198 of 2025) involving alleged offences of assault, intimidation, and other serious crimes under sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 132, 308(3), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Penal Code. The …
The petitioners, comprising five members of the Manjhi family, feared arrest in connection with a criminal case (PS No. 444 of 2024) alleging offences under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes (BNS) and the Witchcraft Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners assaulted a victim …
Golu Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related case (Bihta P.S. Case No. 878 of 2022) involving alleged assault, torture and dowry demands under IPC sections 341, 323, 494, 498A read with section 34 and under the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner claimed innocence and …
Petitioners Prashan Sen and Arvind Sen sought bail fearing arrest in a case (Vishnupad PS Case No. 316 of 2024) alleging assault on an informant and forced signature, with offences under several sections of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged the petitioners were armed and injured the informant. The …
Petitioner Prabhat Kumar Gupta applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry harassment case (Complaint No. 334 of 2023) under Section 498A IPC. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, assaulted and tortured the victim to demand dowry. The petitioner claimed …
Dharmveer Paswan applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry harassment case (Jamui Mahila PS Case No. 37 of 2020) alleging offences under IPC sections 498A, 313 with 34 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. He claimed innocence, asserted he has no criminal antecedent, and that the …
Vikki Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a rape case (Mau P.S. Case No. 96 of 2025) under Section 70(2) of the B.N.S., provisions of the SC/ST (POA) Act and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner committed rape, but the victim's …
Umesh Saw petitioned for anticipatory bail in a dowry harassment case (IPC 498A, 406; Dowry Prohibition Act 3,4) after a proclamation under Sections 82 and 83 of the CrPC had been issued against him for alleged abscondence. The State opposed the bail, arguing that the proclamation barred relief …
Petitioner Ranjit Sah sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry harassment case under Section 498A IPC. The prosecution alleged he, along with others, assaulted the victim to demand dowry. The petitioner claimed innocence and filed an application for anticipatory bail. The court, relying on …
The petitioner, Akash Kumar, was implicated in a kidnapping case (IPC §§363, 366A read with 34) involving the alleged abduction of a minor for marriage. He claimed innocence, asserting that the victim had eloped with him and that he had no prior criminal record. The court examined the allegations …
The petitioner, Dharmnath Rai, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑death case (PS Case No. 99 of 2024) where he is alleged to have demanded dowry, tortured and caused the death of his daughter‑in‑law. The prosecution charged him under Sections 80, 238 read with Section 3(5) of …
Akash Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in connection with a case involving alleged loot and violations of the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that a stolen motorcycle was recovered from his house and that an accomplice had named …
Abdul Jabbar filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous case. During the hearing, the petitioner, through counsel, expressed his desire to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the anticipatory …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dacoity case (Barh P.S. Case No. 450 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that unknown criminals committed the dacoity and the petitioner’s name appeared …
Petitioners Surendra Rai and Dharmendra Rai filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking permission to withdraw the pending criminal miscellaneous application. The learned counsel for the petitioners requested the court's leave to withdraw, and the State counsel was heard. The court, …
The petitioner, Achheylal Yadav, sought relief from imminent arrest in a case (Malsalami P.S. Case No. 86 of 2025) filed under Sections 96, 115(3), 303(2), 352, 351(3) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, alleging abduction of a girl. The victim's statement, recorded under Section 180 of the …
The petitioner, Md. Afroj, was implicated in a dowry harassment complaint (Case No. 49 of 2024) alleging offences under Section 498A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and false implication. The State opposed the …
Ekram Ansari was implicated in a case of assault causing simple injury under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He feared arrest and applied for anticipatory bail, claiming he was falsely implicated. The State opposed the bail. The court examined the facts, the nature of the alleged …
Petitioner Rajnath Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a murder case (Section 302 IPC) registered as Manihari P.S. Case No. 95 of 2025. The prosecution alleged he strangulated the deceased, but the petitioner’s counsel argued that no material evidence linked him to the crime and …
The petitioners, six members of the Yadav family, feared arrest in a criminal case (Malsalami P.S. Case No. 86 of 2025) alleging abduction of a girl. The case was instituted under Sections 96, 115(2), 303(2), 352, 351(3) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The victim’s statement recorded under …
The petitioner, Sahzahan Khatoon, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Madhuban P.S. Case No. 532 of 2024) filed under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was among those who assaulted the prosecution side. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Sumit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after a video of him allegedly waving a pistol went viral on social media, leading to a criminal case under Sections 292 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 27 and 25(9) of the Arms Act. The pistol was not recovered and the …
Petitioner Yogendra Singh feared arrest in a complaint (No. 2323 of 2023) alleging cheating under Section 420 of the IPC, where the prosecution claims he collected Rs. 1,25,000 in three installments for purported house‑construction work. The petitioner contended that he is innocent, that the matter …
The petitioner, Deepak Raj, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal case (PS Case No. 191 of 2025) alleging assault under Sections 127(1), 127(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and others assaulted …
Raja Kumar sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case (PS No. 197 of 2025) alleging his involvement in the supply of 3 kg of ganja, recovered from Vikas Kumar who identified the petitioner as the supplier. The offenses alleged were under Sections 20(b)(ii)(B) and 25 of the Narcotic …
The petitioners, S.K. Bahadur and his son Lefaqat, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (PS Case No.272 of 2025) involving alleged assault over a money dispute. The case was instituted under Sections 126(1), 118(1), 117(3), 109(1) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. …
Prince Kumar Chaudhur and Nikhil Kumar Chaudhur, residents of Bankat village in East Champaran, were charged under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act for alleged demand of rangdari and assaulting an informant, along with four other cases. They filed an …
The petitioner, Panchu Mahto, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (Baruraj P.S. Case No. 269 of 2023) for alleged rape of a 13‑year‑old girl. The prosecution alleged offences under Sections 376 and 385 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The Patna …
The petitioner, Shailendra Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with a case under Sections 25(1‑b)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, where a country‑made pistol and live cartridges were recovered from his residence. The court examined whether the circumstances justified …
The petitioner, Chintu Kumar, was accused under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly defalcating Rs. 1,50,000. He claimed innocence but offered to repay the amount in six equal monthly installments. The State opposed his bail application. The Patna High Court, …
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Case No.268 of 2025) filed under Section 317(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged involvement in a stolen motorcycle case and having prior criminal antecedents. The State opposed the bail, arguing the …
The petitioners, Sridevi and Liladhar Mukhiya, grandparents of the alleged kidnapper Abhishek Kumar, filed a bail application fearing arrest in a POCSO case (Dumra PS Case No.266 of 2025) involving the alleged kidnapping of a minor. The prosecution alleged offences under Sections 137(2) and 96 of …
Petitioner Nitesh S. Sharma applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related assault case (Complaint No. 1137(C) of 2024). The prosecution alleged that he and others assaulted the victim to demand dowry, invoking sections 60, 318(4), 316(2), 303(2), 85 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, …
The petitioners, Shrikant Kumar and Sutil Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with Noor Sarai police case No.257 of 2025, which alleges they attempted to rape a 14‑year‑old girl. The prosecution alleges offences under Sections 137(2) and 140(3) of the B.N.S., and the …
The petitioner, Rohit Kumar Singh, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Bishanpur P.S. Case No. 84 of 2025) involving offences under Section 310(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that unknown criminals committed loot and forgery and that the …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a kidnapping case (Bairiya P.S. Case No. 150 of 2025) filed under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner kidnapped a girl, while the petitioner claimed innocence, …
Rampravesh Kushwaha was implicated in a case (Piprasi P.S. Case No. 70 of 2022) for allegedly defrauding approximately Rs.8,75,000 under Sections 420 and 409/34 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. Fearing arrest, he applied for anticipatory bail, asserting his innocence and offering to repay the amount …
Petitioners Pradeep Kumar and Kuldeep Kumar, accused in Simri Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No. 122 of 2025 for offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest. The State opposed the bail on the ground of alleged assault causing injuries to the …
The petitioner, Basudeo Kumar, feared arrest in connection with a criminal complaint (Case No. 1557(C) of 2023) alleging offences under IPC sections 498(A), 323, 324, 504, 34 and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He expressed willingness to keep the second opposite party, Nipu Kumari, with …
Chhotan Manjhi and Hariom Manjhi applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for alleged assault causing injuries. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners assaulted the victim, while the petitioners claimed …
The petitioner, Sandeep Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a kidnapping case (Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 686 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 363, 365, 366A/34 of the IPC and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged the petitioner had kidnapped a minor girl, while …
The petitioner, Umesh Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Ghoshi PS No.220 of 2025) involving multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, including assault, grievous hurt and other serious charges. He was alleged to have assaulted an informant and a family …
The petitioner, Md. Mustak, was implicated in a complaint (No. 652C of 2024) alleging assault and dowry harassment under IPC sections 323 and 498A and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Fearing arrest, he applied for anticipatory bail. The State and the informant opposed the application. …
The petitioner, Dilkhush Yadav, husband of the deceased, was implicated in a murder case registered as Baheri P.S. Case No. 359 of 2024 under Sections 80, 85 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He filed an application for anticipatory bail fearing arrest, asserting that the charge‑sheet …
The petitioners, Md. Jakur Husain and Md. Ganni (Shane Ali), were charged in Sakri Police Station Case No. 117 of 2025 for offences including assault under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The petitioners applied for anticipatory bail, seeking protection from arrest. The …
Santosh Kumar Panjiyara applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in Mahila Police Station case No.18 of 2025, which alleged his involvement in assault and torture of a woman for dowry under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner …
Petitioner Pankaj Kumar, a system analyst with the Bihar School Examination Board, was implicated in a case alleging tampering of exam results, forgery of records, and issuance of fraudulent certificates. The prosecution charged him under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2) read with Section 3(5) …
Petitioner Pratap Singh, a member of the Panchayat Teacher Niyozan Committee, was alleged to have conspired with Neelam Kumari to facilitate her selection using forged certificates, leading to charges under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 120B and 471. He applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in …
The petitioners, Dilip Sah, Jugeshwar Sah and Anand Kumar, feared arrest in connection with Kalyanpur Police Station Case No. 260 of 2025, which alleged offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. They claimed innocence and argued that the present case was a retaliatory …
The petitioners, Akash Giri, Md. Azharuddin and Amgir Mukhiya, filed anticipatory bail applications fearing arrest in connection with Barharia Police Station Case No. 421 of 2024, which alleges they shot and killed a person, resulting in five gunshot injuries. The offences alleged are under Sections …
Rohit Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a kidnapping case (Sahiyara P.S. Case No. 41 of 2025) under Sections 137(2), 140(3), 96 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that he kidnapped a minor girl, while the …
The petitioners – Akash Giri, Md Azharuddin and Amgir Mukhiya – applied for anticipatory bail in connection with Barharia Police Station Case No 421 of 2024, which involves alleged murder under Sections 103(3) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The …
Ankit Kumar Sah applied for bail after being charged in Andar Police Station Case No. 178 of 2025 under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(10), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly assaulting a victim and causing a simple injury. The petitioner feared arrest and sought relief …
Petitioners Poornima Devi and Bachhu Mukhiya, in‑laws of the complainant, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a dowry‑related complaint (Case No. 23/2023) under IPC sections 498A, 341, 323, 379 and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The State opposed, contending that a …
The petitioners, Akash Giri, Md. Azharuddin and Amgir Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail in connection with Barharia Police Station Case No. 421 of 2024, which alleges they shot and killed a person, resulting in five gunshot injuries. The prosecution alleged offences under Sections 103(3) and 3(5) of …
The petitioners, Amresh Kumar and Anil Kumar, filed applications seeking interim protection in criminal miscellaneous proceedings before the Patna High Court. Both petitioners, through their counsel, later sought to withdraw these applications, requesting liberty to raise their grounds at a later …
The petitioner, Md. Shamsher Alam, sought to quash an order that had rejected his Section 239 Cr.P.C. petition for discharge in a dowry‑related case filed by his wife, Kahkashah Parveen. He alleged that the marriage was illegal because the wife was already lawfully married to Jabir Hussain and had …
The petitioner, Anand Kumar Goyal, borrowed Rs. 7 lakh from the complainant and issued ten cheques of Rs. 49,000 each and one cheque of Rs. 2 lakh to repay the loan. All the cheques bounced due to insufficient funds, leading to a criminal complaint (Case No. 357C of 2016) before the Judicial …
The State of Bihar filed a petition seeking to quash the order dated 17-04-2017 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur (East) in Sakra Police Station Case No. 187 of 2014. The court examined the records and found that the actual aggrieved party was Opposite Party No. 3, not …
The petitioners – the father, mother and brothers of the complainant – sought quashing of the cognizance taken by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in a complaint alleging assault, robbery and criminal intimidation under IPC sections 323, 341, 504 and 379. The complainant, a tempo driver, claimed …
Indal Paswan was granted anticipatory bail on 10 December 2025 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 82833. He filed a modification application on 20 January 2026 seeking an extension of the time allowed for surrendering to the court and furnishing bail bonds for an additional four weeks. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Md. Abulaish, filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash a letter dated 6‑12‑2017 issued by the Regional Office of the Bihar State Pollution Control Board and a mandamus directing the respondents to restrain a brick kiln operated by Moti Sah. The petition also requested the …
The petitioners, a group of residents from Gadua village, filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking interim protection in a criminal miscellaneous case against the State of Bihar and another respondent. During the hearing on 20-01-2026, the petitioners, through counsel Mr. Bipin …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 11‑01‑2018 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Kaimur, which had allowed the complainant’s petition under the same provision. The High Court examined whether the lower …
The petitioner, Dinanath Prasad, filed a writ petition seeking to quash an order dated 25‑11‑2015 that rejected his request to cut a sakhua tree on his raiyati land in West Champaran. He relied on an earlier order of the High Court (C.W.J.C 25370/2013) that had permitted the cutting of the tree. The …
Syed Shujiauddin filed an application in 2019 seeking to quash a cognizance order dated 28 January 2015 that had been passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Patna in Complaint Case No. 1148 of 2014. The application was filed more than four years after the cognizance order, with no explanation …
The appellant Vijay Kumar Jha appealed against the Special Judge’s order rejecting his Section 227 CrPC application, which had allowed framing of charges for alleged offences under the IPC and the SC/ST (PoA) Act arising from a land‑sale dispute with Geeta Devi. The complainant alleged that the …
The petitioners, led by Usha Shah, filed an application in the Patna High Court seeking to quash an order dated 4 January 2019 passed by the District and Sessions Judge, Bhojpur, in a criminal revision case. While the petition was pending, the trial court proceeded with the case and the …
The petitioners, a group of sand‑ghat operators in Rajasthan, were awarded mining rights by the Bihar Department of Mines and Geology and applied for environmental clearance under the EIA Notification No. 1533/2006. They alleged that the State Level Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) held its …
The petitioners, a group of sand‑ghat operators in Madhubani and Banka districts, challenged the environmental clearances granted to them for sand mining. They alleged that the State Level Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) held its appraisal meeting on 03‑08‑2024 without giving the statutorily …
The petitioners, a group of sand‑ghat operators in Rajasthan, challenged the environmental clearances granted by the State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA) of Bihar on the ground that the State Level Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) had conducted its meeting on 3 August 2024 without …
The petitioners, a group of sand‑ghat operators in Rajasthan, were awarded mining rights by the Bihar Department of Mines and Geology and applied for environmental clearance under the EIA Notification No. 1533/2006. They alleged that the State Level Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) held its …
The petitioners, a group of sand‑ghat operators in Madhubani and Banka districts, challenged the environmental clearances granted to them for sand mining. They alleged that the State Level Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) held its appraisal meeting on 03‑08‑2024 without giving the statutorily …
The petitioners, a group of sand‑ghat operators in Madhubani and Banka districts, challenged the environmental clearances granted to them by the State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA) on the ground that the State Level Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) had conducted its appraisal …
The petitioners Vinay Kumar Singh filed an application in the Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous matter arising from a 2017 complaint. During the hearing on 20‑01‑2026, the petitioner's counsel sought to withdraw the application, seeking liberty to raise the grounds at a later stage. The …
Anand Kumar Gupta filed an application seeking interim protection in a criminal miscellaneous case against the State of Bihar and Sachchidanand Dubey. The petitioner later sought to withdraw the application, requesting liberty to raise grounds later. The Patna High Court, noting the withdrawal and …
Ramashray Singh filed an application before the Patna High Court challenging an order dated 23.01.2019 passed by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtas, in Criminal Revision No. 232 of 2017 arising out of Miscellaneous Case No. 34 (M) of 2015. The petitioner contended that the order was ex‑parte …
The petitioner, Sanjay Lahkar, filed an application challenging the order dated 28‑01‑2019 of the Additional Sessions Judge which dismissed his revision against an earlier order dated 5‑02‑2018 in a criminal case. The High Court, after hearing counsel, found merit in the petition and quashed the …
Arshad Habib filed an application seeking to quash an order dated 03‑03‑2015 passed by the Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate in a criminal case. The High Court directed the petitioner’s counsel to issue notices to the opposite parties and to comply with procedural requirements, granting four weeks …
The petitioners challenged an order dated 19 May 2009 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Nawadah in Complaint Case No. 826-C of 2008. The challenge was filed before the Patna High Court in 2019, more than a decade after the impugned order. The court examined whether the petition could be …
The petitioners, Amresh Kumar and Anil Kumar, filed applications seeking interim protection in criminal miscellaneous proceedings before the Patna High Court. Both petitioners, through their counsel, later sought to withdraw these applications, requesting liberty to raise their grounds at a later …
Amar Nath filed an application to quash the order of cognizance dated 12‑11‑2014 in a case arising from a tenancy dispute. The petitioner alleged that the FIR and subsequent criminal charges under IPC sections 341, 323 and 504 were filed by the tenant, Smt. Arti, to exert pressure in a civil …
The petitioner, a rice mill proprietor, challenged the order dated 10‑12‑2018 that took cognizance of an FIR alleging cheating, forgery and violation of Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act (ECA) in connection with the seizure of a truck carrying rice. The prosecution claimed the rice was …
Krishna Prasad Keshri and his wife Bina Devi filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking interim protection in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding. They later requested to withdraw the application and were granted liberty to raise all their grounds at the stage of framing of charge, as …
The petitioners in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding filed an application before the Patna High Court. After hearing, the petitioners sought to withdraw the application, seeking liberty to raise all grounds at a later stage. The Court permitted the withdrawal and directed that any future …
The petitioner, Sunny Kumar, filed an application seeking to withdraw a pending application and requested liberty to raise all grounds at the stage of framing of charge. The High Court, after hearing counsel for both parties, permitted the withdrawal of the application and allowed the petitioner to …
Ram Chandra Khairwar filed an application seeking interim protection and to raise objections to the maintainability of his prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioner later requested to withdraw the application and to raise all grounds at the stage of framing of …
Bhola Singh filed an application under Section 227 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking discharge in an excise case, challenging the order of the Second Additional Sessions Judge that rejected his discharge plea. The High Court examined whether the lower court’s refusal could be quashed, …
The petitioner, Anand Kumar Goyal, borrowed Rs. 7 lakh from the complainant and issued ten cheques of Rs. 49,000 each and one cheque of Rs. 2 lakh to repay the loan. All the cheques bounced due to insufficient funds, leading to a criminal complaint (Case No. 357C of 2016) before the Judicial …
The petitioners, Vikash Kumar Singh and Birendra Kumar, filed an application to quash the order of cognizance dated 27‑04‑2019 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas, which was based on FIR allegations of assault, robbery, and threat with a pistol. They contended that the FIR was false, …
The petitioner, Ashish Saha, filed an application seeking quashal of FIR No. 84/2019 dated 24-03-2019 registered at Bahadurganj Police Station for offences under various sections of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR alleged that the petitioner, along with four armed persons, had molested, restrained, …
The appellant, Devendra Sah, appealed a conviction under IPC section 304B and section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, for which he was sentenced to ten years' imprisonment and a fine. He filed an interlocutory application seeking suspension of the sentence and release on bail pending the appeal. The …
The petitioners filed a petition in the Patna High Court seeking quash of an order dated 20 May 2019 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtas, which had set aside a magistrate’s dismissal of complaint case 937/2017. The magistrate had dismissed the complaint on the basis of a police report …
Rakesh Giri petitioned to quash the order dated 08.08.2018 by the Chief Judicial Magistrate that took cognizance of offences under IPC s.307 read with s.120B and Arms Act s.27. The prosecution had lodged three FIRs for the same incident, alleging that Giri conspired to murder an informant. Giri …
Petitioners Kundan Kumar and others sought to quash a July 1, 2019 order of cognizance taken by a Judicial Magistrate under several IPC sections and the Arms Act in a land‑dispute case. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners threatened and assaulted Sanju Devi with weapons and that Kundan …
The petitioners, four former teachers, filed an application to quash the order of cognizance dated 24‑06‑2019 taken by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger, in a case alleging forgery of their experience certificates under IPC sections 420/34, 467, 468, 471 and 120B. The FIR was based on …
Kamleshwar Prasad filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking to withdraw the pending application and to raise all grounds at the stage of framing of charge. The State of Bihar opposed the request. The court examined the petitioner's prayer in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Kanchan …
The petitioners filed an application seeking to quash the order of cognizance dated 1 July 2019 issued by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Masaurhi, which had taken cognizance of offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 307, 504 and Arms Act section 27 in connection with a …
The petitioner, MD. Tarique Fatah, filed an application in the Patna High Court. Counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the application. The Court granted the request, allowing the withdrawal. Accordingly, the application was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the …
Om Prakash Mahto filed a petition under Section 239 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to set aside a February 2019 order of the Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi, which had rejected his application to quash a criminal case filed by Baljit Mahto alleging cheating and criminal breach of trust over a …
The petitioner, Janeshwar Pandey, filed an application seeking to quash an FIR registered under Section 135 of the Bihar Electricity Act, 2003. The petitioner argued that a charge sheet had already been filed and cognizance taken, rendering the quash petition unnecessary, and requested permission to …
The Patna High Court heard an application filed by petitioners seeking relief in Criminal Miscellaneous No.4700 of 2019. The petitioners, through counsel, elected to withdraw the application, requesting liberty to raise the grounds at a later stage. The Court allowed the withdrawal, dismissed the …
The petitioner, Lalan Kumar Singh, filed an application seeking to quash the order dated 20 September 2018 of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Munger, which refused the release of his licensed revolver, and also to quash a subsequent order of the Additional Sessions Judge affirming the same. …
The petitioner Jogendra Ravidas filed an application in 2019 seeking to quash a 2010 order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhabhua, which had taken cognizance of offences under IPC sections 147, 323, 324 and 342. The petition was filed after an inordinate delay. The Patna High Court, after hearing …
The petitioners, comprising Uzra Bano and her sons, were accused in a complaint of assaulting and stealing Rs.30,000 from the complainant. They filed an application to quash the order dated 06-10-2018 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Second Class, Patna, asserting that the dispute had been settled …
The appellant, a minor at the time of the alleged offence, was charged under Sections 20(b)(II)(c), 23, 25 and 29 of the NDPS Act for the alleged recovery of 71.140 kg of charas. The trial court denied bail, but the appellant’s counsel argued that under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of …
Kamli Devi filed a complaint alleging that her husband was brutally assaulted by several accused on 12 March 2017, leading to his death. The Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) of Sheohar took cognizance of the offences under Sections 341, 323, 302, 504 and 34 IPC against all named accused and scheduled …
Abren Kumar, a juvenile aged under eighteen, was charged with murder under IPC sections 302/34 and the Arms Act section 27. He had been detained since September 2022. The appellant sought bail, invoking the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, arguing that bail is a rule for …
The petitioner, Ram Subhodh Choudhary, filed an application to quash the order dated 16.05.2018 in which a Judicial Magistrate took cognizance against him under IPC sections 406, 420 read with 34, based on a complaint by Dinanath Chaudhary alleging breach of a partnership agreement, non‑payment of …
Shankar Ram, the petitioner, sought to quash a magistrate's order of cognizance dated 01‑12‑2018 that had taken cognizance of offences under IPC sections 363 and 366(A) and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. He argued that he was merely the uncle of the main accused and had no role in the alleged crime. …
Shiv Shankar Prasad filed an application seeking to raise all grounds at the stage of framing of charge in a criminal miscellaneous case. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the application and defer raising the grounds. The court allowed the withdrawal, noting that any …
The petitioner, a Circle Officer, filed an application to quash a magistrate's order that took cognizance of offences under Sections 427 and 504 IPC for demolishing an encroachment allegedly targeting the complainant's ancestral house. The petitioner argued that the action was taken in his official …
The petitioners, Pankaj Kumar Singh and Chandra Shekhar Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court challenging an order of a magistrate. They contended that the application had become infructuous because the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Begusarai, had …
The petitioner, Angad Shukla, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Bihar Mines and Geology Department to refund Rs.9,64,000 deposited as a successful bidder for confiscated sand and to pay interest, alleging malafide actions that prevented him from completing the work. He claimed …
The petitioners – Ram Babu Yadav, Savitri Devi and Naresh Kumar Singh – filed an application under Section 239 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 26‑08‑2019 of the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Darbhanga, which had rejected their earlier application. The complainant …
The petitioners filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking to set aside an order dated 03.08.2019 of the Gopalganj Fast Track Court, which had rejected their petition under Section 227 read with Section 154(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioners submitted a supplementary …
Dr. Sanjeev Kumar Agrawal filed an application seeking interim protection in a criminal miscellaneous case. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Bipin Kumar, requested to withdraw the application and sought liberty to raise all grounds at the stage of framing of charge. The court, after hearing …
The petitioners sought to quash a 11‑April‑2017 order in which a Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate had taken cognizance under IPC Section 498A and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act against all accused in complaint No. 3081(C) of 2016. Petitioners 3 and 4, the brother and sister‑in‑law of the …
The petitioner, Ajay Sharan, filed an application in the High Court of Judicature at Patna in criminal miscellaneous case No. 61038 of 2018 arising from a 2016 police case. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Bipin Bihari Singh, with counsel Mr. Prashant Kumar seeking permission to withdraw the …
The petitioner, Pawan Kumar Suman, was facing arrest in a criminal case (Madhepura PS Case No. 482 of 2020) for alleged offences under Sections 419, 420 and 409 of the Indian Penal Code relating to non‑deposit of Rs. 21,96,357. He had already paid Rs. 7,77,937 and was ready to furnish a demand draft …
The petitioners, three male relatives of an informant, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging they had tortured the informant over dowry demands. The State opposed the bail, contending the allegations …
The petitioner, Chandan Pathak, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal case (PS Dawath Case No. 321 of 2024) alleging offences of molestation, threats to make intimate moments viral, and an acid attack under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the …
Vikram Kumar was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case (PS Saraiya Case No. 98 of 2022) under IPC sections 363, 366 and 34. The prosecution alleged that he abducted a girl, but the victim’s statement under Section 183 of the BNSS indicated that she had voluntarily eloped with the petitioner. …
The petitioner, Balmiki Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Case No. 102 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 109, 351(3), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleges that the petitioner stabbed the victim, …
The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a kidnapping case (Punaura PS Case No. 99 of 2025) under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleges that he abducted the informant's daughter, while the petitioner claims innocence, stating the girl …
The petitioners sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under sections 223, 152, 196, 197 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly waving a Palestine flag on the eve of Muharram, a sensitive religious occasion. The prosecution alleged that the act could disrupt public order. …
The petitioner, Md. Safique Mansoori, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court seeking compliance with a prior court order. The Court directed the Superintendent of Police (S.P.), Sitamarhi to submit a report, but the S.P. forwarded a junior officer's report instead and …
The petitioner, Nitesh Kumar, was arrested in a PMLA case alleging that he facilitated cyber‑fraud and money‑laundering by arranging bank accounts and transferring €950 from a foreign victim’s credit card to a shell company. He contended that he was an unwitting victim whose documents were misused, …
Petitioner Ravi Kumar filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court challenging actions of various officials of the State of Bihar. The petition listed several respondents including the State, the District Magistrate, and other local officials. During the hearing on 16-01-2026, the …
Vijay Sah, a director of an unauthorised Nidhi company, was charged under Sections 406, 420, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged misappropriation of approximately Rs. 2 crore. He applied for regular bail before the Patna High Court, having been in custody since 7 November 2023 and …
The petitioner, Niraj Kumar, was in custody since 2 March 2025 for offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, arising from a dispute in his apartment where he allegedly stabbed an informant. He applied for regular bail for the second time after a prior bail plea was …
The petitioner, Md Ibran, was charged under Sections 25(1‑b)a, 25(1‑AA), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act in Naya Bhojpur P.S. Case No. 2 of 2024 and had been in custody since September 2024. His earlier bail application was rejected, but he filed a second regular bail petition arguing that the charge was …
Manish Chandra Agrawal filed a criminal writ petition challenging the issuance of notice in Title Suit No. 288 of 2025 filed by respondents 9‑14. The petitioner's counsel claimed no notice was received, while the respondents asserted that notice had been issued. The court held that the petitioner, …
The petitioner, Dhananjay Kumar, brother of the informant, was charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for assaulting the informant with a rod. He had been in custody since March 9, 2025, and his earlier bail application was rejected. The petitioner’s senior counsel …
The petitioner, Aditya Kumar Pandey, was arrested in August 2022 and charged under the Arms Act (Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26, 35) and the NDPS Act (Sections 8, 20(b)(ii)(b), 22) for possession of a pistol, live cartridges and 1.5 kg of ganja. He applied for regular bail for the first time, which was …
Daulat Yadav was arrested in connection with a case under the NDPS Act for alleged possession of 3.080 kg of ganja, charged under Sections 8, 20(b)(ii)(B) and 25. He had been in custody since 7 January 2025 and had previously applied for regular bail, which was rejected. On a second bail …
Santosh Kumar was charged under multiple sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing at a victim, resulting in injuries. He applied for regular bail for the second time after an earlier bail denial. The petitioner argued that no witness had …
The petitioner, Sachin Kumar, was arrested on 10 January 2025 for alleged possession of 6.245 kg of ganja, charged under Sections 8 and 20(b)(ii)B of the NDPS Act. His earlier bail application was rejected on 23 April 2025. He filed a second bail application, contending that the trial had progressed …
The petitioner, Mithilesh Mandal, was charged under IPC Section 376(D‑A) and POCSO Act Section 4(6) for allegedly raping a minor. The prosecution alleged that the accused forcibly took the victim on a motorcycle, gagged her, and committed rape. The petitioner sought regular bail, arguing that …
The petitioner, Rajiv Ranjan Kumar, was arrested on 17-12-2024 after 1.8 kg of ganja and 32 plant pieces were seized from him. He was charged under Sections 20(A), 20(B)(II)(B) and 25 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. His earlier bail application was rejected on …
Surendra Mahto was arrested in March 2025 after a raid on a shop in Madhubani recovered various narcotic substances, mobile phones and Nepali currency. He was charged under Sections 20 and 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act for alleged involvement in a narcotics …
The petitioner, Dhirendra Paswan, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 310(2) and 317(3) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act (BNS) and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He had been in custody since 13 November 2024 and had previously applied for bail, which was rejected. …
Mahendra Marandi was charged under IPC sections 363, 364, 365, 506 and later 302, as well as Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act for the alleged killing of a deceased person. He applied for regular bail for the second time after an earlier bail application was rejected. The petitioner argued that no …
The petitioner, Rohit Sah, was accused in Barharia P.S. Case No. 624 of 2024 of kidnapping a minor girl under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and Sections 8 and 17 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution sought denial of bail, alleging the offences were serious. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Md Mustakim, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (Trial No. 4426 of 2023) arising from a 2017 dowry‑related complaint that alleged offences under Sections 498A, 504, 323, 307, 406, 420 of the IPC and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution …
The petitioners, members of the Mahto family, feared arrest in connection with Goraul Police Station Case No. 15 of 2025, which alleged offences under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. They asserted that they were innocent and were being harassed due …
The petitioner, Bibha Devi, sister‑in‑law of the alleged victim, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related torture case (Kartaha P.S. Case No. 38 of 2025). The prosecution alleged offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The …
Debnath Mukherjee was arrested in connection with a complaint alleging cheating, criminal breach of trust, forgery and criminal conspiracy under IPC sections 406, 420, 467, 468 and 120(B) relating to a dispute over the sale proceeds of a flat. The petitioner claimed he was innocent, stating he was …
Manish Kumar Gupta, a senior bank official, was accused of assaulting his wife and evicting her from their matrimonial home, leading to a criminal case under Sections 85, 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest. The State opposed …
The petitioner, Rajnish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a murder case (Pakaridayal P.S. Case No. 35 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along …
The petitioners, Ashok Ram and Dhanesh Ram, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Case No. 271/2025) involving alleged assault with lathi and danda that led to the death of a relative. The prosecution alleged that thirteen FIRs named the petitioners among other accused, charging them …
The petitioners, Ranjit Kumar and Sujit Singh, were implicated in a case (Halai P.S. Case No. 107 of 2025) alleging an attempt to rape a minor, invoking several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the POCSO Act. They applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that the victim's statement …
The petitioners, Sharwan Kumar and Mantan Chandrabanshi, sought bail fearing arrest in a case (Konch P.S. Case No. 607 of 2022) that alleged their involvement in violent assaults causing head injuries to an informant and his two sons, and injuries to four persons. The prosecution charged them under …
The petitioners Rani Devi, Sonu Kumar and Shrawan Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (No. 516 of 2025) alleging assault of three women under several sections of the Bihar Special (BNSS) Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners had regularly assaulted the informant's …
The petitioners, eight men related to the groom’s side, feared arrest in connection with a criminal case (Sajour P.S. Case No. 71 of 2025) alleging assault on the bride’s side under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners participated in …
The petitioners, Bablu Ray and Mohan Ray, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in connection with Darbhanga Town Police Station Case No. 125 of 2025, which is registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleges that the petitioners assaulted the victim. The …
The petitioner, Hridya Yadav, sought bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Ramgarhwa No.348 of 2025) involving alleged possession of illegal arms. The prosecution alleged recovery of a country‑made pistol, a rifle, and magazines from the petitioner’s room, charging him under Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26, 35 …
Hari Om Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (Balwahat P.S. Case No.22 of 2025) involving alleged extortion, discharge of firearms and injury to a person. The prosecution charged him under several sections of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner …
The petitioners, numbered 2, 4, 5 and 6, sought bail after being implicated in a case (Phulparas P.S. Case No. 143 of 2025) involving offences under various sections of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Statute (BNS) and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that they assaulted an informant …
The petitioner, Niranjan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Bahera P.S. Case No.104 of 2024) involving alleged offences under Sections 310(4) and 310(5) of the BNS and Sections 25(1‑b)a and 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that unknown criminals were planning a …
Bulbul Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a kidnapping case (PS Kumarkhand Case No. 161 of 2025) under Sections 87 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that he kidnapped a married woman who had eloped with Rahul Kumar, Bulbul's brother. …
The petitioners, Ramesh Yadav and Pawan Kumar, were implicated in a police case (No. 269 of 2025) for alleged assault and other offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. They applied for anticipatory bail, asserting their innocence and noting that the informant was a …
The petitioner, Md. Oquais Salik, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related complaint (Kishanganj Complaint No. 97 of 2025) alleging torture, abuse and assault under Section 85 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section ¾ of the Domestic Violence Act. The prosecution alleged …
The petitioners, Ramesh Paswan and Upendra Paswan, filed a bail application fearing arrest in connection with PS Nokha Case No.219 of 2025, which was instituted under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 351(2), 352(3) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners had …
Amit Kumar Paswan applied for bail after learning that he might be arrested in connection with a case (Bachhwara P.S. Case No. 05 of 2023) alleging offences under Sections 366(a) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly abducting a girl. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated …
Krishn Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a criminal case (PS Case No. 143 of 2025) alleging illegal mining under Sections 303(2) and 317(2) of the B.N.S., Section 21 of the M.M. (D&R) Act, 1957 and Section 56 of the B.M. (CPIMTS) amendment Rules, 2019. The petitioner …
The petitioners, members of the Pramod Das family, feared arrest in a case concerning alleged assault with swords and lathis over a land dispute, for which they were charged under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act. The prosecution alleged they injured the informant’s relatives …
The petitioners – Jai Nandan Singh, his son Pramod Kumar, grandson Prince Kumar and local resident Chotu Kumar – applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a Danapur police case (No. 841 of 2025) that alleged offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, including …
The petitioners, Sadhu Ram (Shiv Pratap Rai) and his wife Dharmsheela Devi, feared arrest in a criminal case (Naya Bhojpur P.S. Case No.31 of 2025) filed under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The police had exonerated them and filed a final form clearing them, while a …
The petitioners, Santosh Mandal and Phoolwati Devi, parents of a minor accused of attempted rape, feared arrest in a case registered under multiple provisions of the BNS, the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. They contended that they were falsely implicated solely because of their relationship to the …
The petitioners, five individuals related to a deceased person, feared arrest in a case (Rupauli P.S. Case No. 135 of 2025) alleging they killed the deceased under Sections 108 and 3(5) of the BNSS. The prosecution’s case described the petitioners as the in‑laws and villagers who allegedly murdered …
The petitioner, Shailesh Patel, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS 550 of 2024) involving alleged violent assault and shooting. The prosecution alleged that Patel and others assaulted an informant, forced the victim into a marriage hall, and on Patel’s orders, Abhishek Patel shot …
The petitioner, Subodh Mandal, faced arrest in connection with a police case alleging offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act, primarily for allegedly firing at an informant and his brother. The prosecution alleged his involvement, but the informant, through …
Vijay Yadav applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case where he is alleged to have shot at an informant under Sections 109 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleges that the petitioner fired a gun causing injury to the informant. The …
The petitioner, Master Nayem, sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case (PS Amour Case No. 260 of 2025) where he was alleged to have assaulted a victim, violating sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner caused various …
Babul Sharma applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a 2017 case (PS No. 38) concerning alleged theft of high‑tension wire, charged under Sections 379, 411, 413 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that Sharma and others cut and stole the wire from an electrical tower. …
Petitioner Jeetendra Tiwari applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging assault with a Gadasa. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner assaulted the victim's head, while the petitioner claimed innocence, citing an …
Naulesh Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Begusarai Mufassil P.S. Case No. 431 of 2024) filed under Sections 109(1), 352, 117(2), 118(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and others …
The petitioner, Ravi Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Rafiganj P.S. Case No. 282 of 2025) involving multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, arising from a family money dispute. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, being the brother‑in‑law of the …
Ajay Thakur applied for anticipatory bail after the police raided his house in connection with a case registered under Sections 126(2), 127(2), 132, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the accused, including the petitioner, assaulted the police …
The petitioner, Rohit Raj, was implicated in a Bodhgaya police case alleging assault with a shard-edged weapon causing injuries, charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He claimed innocence, asserting that a prior personal dispute led to his false implication. The State …
The petitioner, Sandeep Kumar, filed a bail application fearing arrest in Mahila Police Station Case No. 49 of 2025, which alleged offences under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner had a physical relationship with the informant under the pretext of …
Petitioners Jaitun Yadav and Bipin Devi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a 1995 case (Andhrathari PS No.81) involving alleged offences under IPC sections 498A, 302, 201 and 304B. The prosecution alleged that they, along with others, assaulted an informant's sister over a demand for a cow …
The petitioner, Afroz Mansoori, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Case No.321 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 126(2), 74, 75(1), 76, 3(5) of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 8 and 12 of the P.O.C.S.O. Act, wherein he is accused of taking an informant's daughter to a …
The petitioner, Bittu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Lakhisarai PS Case No. 898 of 2021) involving alleged offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 509 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and others looted and assaulted an …
The petitioners, who are relatives of a deceased person allegedly killed in a murder case (Paras Bigha P.S. Case No. 201 of 2025), sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 80(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The High Court examined the general and omnibus nature of the …
The petitioner, Ritesh Ranjan, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 25(1‑b)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The police had recovered two country‑made pistols from co‑accused persons, and the co‑accused’s self‑inculpatory statement alleged that the …
Mahesh Ray applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in Sadar P.S. Case No. 504 of 2025, which alleged his involvement in extortion along with others under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner demanded money from an informant, while the petitioner …
The petitioner, Anamul Haque, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Baniyapur PS Case No. 264 of 2025) filed under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita alleging he abused and assaulted the informant's husband. The petitioner claimed innocence and a clean criminal record, …
Petitioner Rajesh Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with a criminal case (Maner PS Case No. 800 of 2025) that alleged his involvement in an attempted rape of a 13‑year‑old girl. The prosecution charged him under multiple provisions of the Bihar Narcotic Substances (BNS) …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, a driver, was implicated in a traffic accident that resulted in two deaths and was charged under Sections 281, 106(1), 125(A), 125(B) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments (BNSS) Act, with Section 105 later added. He claimed innocence, asserted that he also sustained …
