Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
3365 judgments · newest first · showing 2801–3000
The petitioners, a group of relatives from Pidara village, filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking to quash an order dated 1 November 2015 passed by the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj, in a criminal miscellaneous case. The application was filed six years after the …
The appellants, five members of the Thakur family, were charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting the informant and his sister on 7 February 2021. The informant claimed the accused dragged his sister and, …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 227 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 28‑02‑2019 that dismissed their earlier petition for discharge from charges of Sections 341, 324, 307, 504 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution case alleged that on …
The appellant Suraj Thakur was charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for an alleged assault on an informant’s sister and the informant on 7 February 2021. The appellant contended that he was falsely implicated and that no …
The petitioner Pradeep Kumar Singh filed an amendment to his quashing application seeking to set aside an order dated 22 February 2021 passed by the Sessions Judge, Supaul. The High Court allowed the amendment, directing that the impugned order be set aside and granting the petitioner liberty to …
The petitioners, a group of relatives from Bastar, Chhattisgarh, filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court seeking to quash the order dated 7 March 2019 passed by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Samastipur, in a case registered under Sections 498(A), 307, 120B of the …
The petitioner, Kumar Pramendra, filed an application in the Patna High Court seeking to raise all grounds at a later stage. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested permission to withdraw the application. The court allowed the withdrawal and directed that if the petitioner later files such …
The petitioners, Ashwini Kumar and Rajiv Ranjan, filed an application seeking to quash an order dated 7 November 2019 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 1st Danapur, in case No. 255 of 2015. The application was filed more than 21 months after the impugned order. The Court observed …
The petitioners filed an application seeking to quash an FIR registered under Sections 341, 323, 498A, 379 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The court noted that a charge‑sheet had already been filed and cognizance taken on the case. Since the matter had progressed beyond the stage at which an …
The petitioners sought quashing of FIR No. 510 of 2020 registered under IPC sections 406, 420, 384 and 34, alleging that the dispute arose solely from a breach of a sale agreement for land and that the matter could be redressed by a civil suit for specific performance. The prosecution alleged that …
The appellant Manish Kumar filed a criminal appeal before the Patna High Court. The Court had earlier allowed the appeal on 4 August 2022 subject to the removal of certain procedural defects. The parties complied and the court’s office note confirmed that the defects were removed. In view of this …
The petitioners challenged two orders: a revisional order dated 09.04.2025 that set aside a favorable District Magistrate order, and a confiscation order dated 30.12.2023 that seized two trucks loaded with stone boulders. They sought certiorari to quash both orders and mandamus to release the …
The petitioner, Md. Meraj Akhtar Ansari, filed an application seeking to quash two orders dated 30 July 2019 and 28 October 2016, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 465 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code against him and others. The orders were passed by the 10th Additional District …
The appellant, Suraj Kumar, a juvenile assessed to be under eighteen at the time of the alleged murder of an informant's husband, had been in custody since 25‑08‑2024. He filed an application for bail, contending that under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, bail is …
The petitioner, Suresh Sharma, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Bihar, to dispose of his objection dated 10 March 2025 to include his saw‑mill in the Final Seniority List, which is required for a license under the Bihar Saw Mills …
The appellant, Md. Arman, a juvenile assessed to be under eighteen, was alleged to have participated in a gang rape. He filed an application for bail, invoking the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, specifically sections that treat bail as a rule and its denial as an …
Petitioner Pradeep Yadav was levied a penalty of Rs.8,65,344 by the Mineral Development Officer, Nawada, based on a letter dated 09‑09‑2025. The petitioner contended that the penalty was imposed without a show‑cause notice or any opportunity of hearing, violating natural justice. The High Court …
The petitioner, Ranjeet Kumar Yadav, challenged the seizure of his vehicle and a hefty fine imposed by Bihar authorities, alleging that the penalty was levied without a prior hearing and that a show‑cause notice was issued only after the decision was made. The court examined whether the post‑factum …
Petitioner Ravi Kumar was levied a penalty of Rs. 8,55,250 by the Mineral Development Officer, Nawada, without any show‑cause notice or hearing. The petitioner contended that this contravened the principles of natural justice. The High Court observed that the mining authorities had repeatedly been …
The petitioner, Virendra Yadav, challenged a penalty of Rs.8,96,281 imposed by the Mineral Development Officer, Nawada, via a letter dated 03.09.2025, alleging that no show‑cause notice or hearing was afforded. The Court noted that prior directives had warned mining authorities against imposing …
Kaushal Kumar Singh was charged under Sections 302, 304(B), 120(B) of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for the alleged torture and killing of his wife. He had been in custody since August 2024 and was granted regular bail on 4 September 2025 subject to the condition that the …
The petitioner, Jawala Prasad, applied for bail in a case registered under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. His earlier bail application had been rejected on 15 September 2025. He filed a new bail application within six months of the rejection. The Patna High Court held that the new application …
Manu Rai applied for regular bail for offences under Sections 319(2), 313(4), 303(2), 336(3) and 340(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, relating to an alleged ATM fraud. This was his second bail application after a prior denial on 24‑09‑2025. The prosecution highlighted the seriousness of the …
Ajit Kumar, the petitioner, filed a modification application seeking to alter the bail order dated 15 October 2025 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 53730 of 2025. The application was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Patna, presided over by Justice Sandeep Kumar. The central issue was …
The petitioner, Sujit Kapad, was arrested in connection with the seizure of 1,075 bottles of codeine‑rich cough syrup from a tempo, alleged to be offences under Section 317(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances (BNS) Act and Section 21(c) of the NDPS Act. He had been in custody since 5 December 2024 …
Nitish Kumar was charged under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act for a murder that occurred in Madhuban. The petitioner sought regular bail, arguing that no witness had yet been examined. The court noted that the petitioner had given a self‑incriminating …
The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar, filed a third application for regular bail in a Sessions trial (No. 678 of 2025) arising from a case registered on 4 January 2025 at Chapra Town Police Station. He has been in custody since 5 January 2025, and the trial has proceeded with seven witnesses already …
Ram Yadav, accused of murder under Sections 103(1), 61(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act, applied for regular bail for the second time. The petitioner contended that charges had been framed but no witness had been examined, warranting bail. The court noted …
The petitioner, Rameshwar Kumar, was charged with kidnapping and murdering a six‑year‑old child under Sections 363, 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He has been in custody since 29 April 2024 and the charges have been formally framed. The petitioner filed a second application for regular …
The petitioner, Md. Sajid Ansari, was involved in a criminal proceeding (Criminal Miscellaneous No.84284 of 2025) before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the case, an application was filed before the court, the nature of which is not specified in the record. The petitioner subsequently …
Binod Ray was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 115(2) and 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 25(1‑Ba), 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing at an informant and causing chest injury. The petitioner, in custody since 4 December 2024, filed a …
The petitioner, Mithilesh Rai, sought regular bail in a case registered under Sections 304B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the alleged murder of his wife. His earlier bail application had been rejected in November 2024. The petitioner argued innocence, that only charges had been framed, and …
The petitioner, Pankaj Sharma, was arrested in connection with the offences alleged in Sessions Trial No. 1522 of 2025 arising out of PS Rajiv Nagar Case No. 654 of 2024. He has been in custody since 23 December 2024 and possesses eighteen prior criminal convictions. The petitioner filed a second …
The petitioner, Rajesh Kumar Singh, was arrested as the driver of a Scorpio car from which 445.17 litres of illegal liquor were seized. He was charged under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated and had been in custody …
Kishundev Ram was arrested in connection with a murder case (Baruraj P.S. Case No. 188 of 2024) under Sections 115(2), 126, 80 and 3(5) of the BNS. He had been in custody since 15 January 2025 and claimed he was falsely implicated and that the trial was unduly delayed. The petitioner’s counsel …
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, had earlier been granted bail by the High Court on 22 September 2025 in connection with Beur Police Station Case No. 134/2025. However, the lower court refused to accept his bail bond, citing a prior criminal antecedent, and the petitioner remained in custody since 17 …
Lachhi Ram was granted bail on 15-10-2025 with the condition that both bailors be his blood relatives. He later applied for modification, stating that his only blood relative, his wife, had already signed the bail affidavit and no other blood relative was available. The petitioner argued that the …
The petitioner, Jitendra Manjhi, was arrested on 18 October 2024 for alleged cultivation of opium and charged under Sections 8(b), 18 and 29 of the NDPS Act. He has been in custody since his arrest and has three prior convictions under the same Act. The petitioner applied for regular bail after the …
The petitioner, Vikash Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Section 64(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 6 and 12 of the POCSO Act. The allegations involve the petitioner obtaining a naked photograph of the minor victim during a WhatsApp video call and the …
Full Devi, the wife of a deceased soldier, had earlier applied for anticipatory bail which was rejected on 7 March 2022. She subsequently failed to surrender and filed a second anticipatory bail application. The Patna High Court, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in G.R. Ananda Baju v. State …
The petitioner, Dharmendra Yadav, was charged under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act in Akbarpur P.S. Case No. 395 of 2025. The Patna High Court had earlier granted him bail on 24‑09‑2025, subject to verification of his antecedent. Upon verification, the lower court …
The Patna High Court heard applications for regular bail and anticipatory bail filed by several accused in a kidnapping case (PS Case No. 368 of 2023) involving offences under the IPC and the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners participated in the kidnapping of a minor girl along …
The petitioner, Vikky Kumar, was arrested in connection with a robbery and assault case (Sugauli PS Case No. 263 of 2024) under Section 393 of the Indian Penal Code. The alleged crime involved multiple accused persons stabbing a victim, binding him, and looting his mobile phone, cash, and a watch, …
The petitioner, Lal Babu Ram, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 392 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged robbery and assault. The prosecution alleged that unknown criminals injured an informant and looted two mobile phones, one of which was recovered from the …
The petitioner, Pramod Bind, was charged with gang rape under Section 376(D) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4, 6 and 8 of the POCSO Act. He applied for regular bail for the second time, having been in custody since 15 January 2023, after an earlier bail application was rejected. The …
Petitioners Punit Kumar and Shubham Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case registered under Sections 140(3), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act, alleging that the victim was kidnapped and assaulted over a business dispute. The State contended that …
The petitioner, Mithun Paswan, filed an application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding and later sought permission to withdraw it. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested the court's permission to withdraw the application. The court, after hearing the counsel, granted permission to …
The petitioners, Punit Kumar and Shubham Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in two criminal miscellaneous cases alleging that the kidnapping and assault charges under Sections 140(3), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS were false. The prosecution alleged that the victims were kidnapped and assaulted due …
Vikash Kumar Singh applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Laxmipur PS Case No. 314 of 2024) alleging illegal transport of sand under multiple sections of the BNS, the Mines Act and the Bihar Minerals Prevention of Illegal Mining Transportation and Storage Rule, 2019. The prosecution …
The petitioner, Binod Kumar Mahto, filed an application to confirm the provisional bail granted to him on 22 November 2024 in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from PS Case No. 105 of 2018. The petitioner’s counsel asserted that the entire amount of Rs. 4.5 lakh alleged to be involved in the …
The petitioner, the successful bidder for the Bhojpur Sone‑35 sand ghat, claimed that the State of Bihar had misrepresented the available sand quantity and had granted overlapping short‑term permits to third parties, depleting the resource. The petitioner sought reduction of royalty, a fresh …
Jay Prakash, the petitioner, filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking relief concerning his motorcycle, which had been seized. The respondents included the State of Bihar, senior police officials, and a traffic ASI, Guria Kumari, who were parties to the seizure. The State counsel …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar Ashk, filed an application seeking to quash the order dated 27 June 2019 in Mahila Police Station Case No. 27 of 2018, wherein cognizance was taken for offences under Sections 354A and 509 of the Indian Penal Code after a charge‑sheet was filed. The High Court allowed …
The petitioner, Sharad Chandra Sarraf, filed an application seeking to quash the entire proceeding of Special Case No. 422 of 2015 (Kadamkuan PS Case No. 534 of 2015) and the order taking cognizance dated 19‑04‑2016 under Section 135 of the Electricity Act. He contended that he had deposited the …
Mahendra Prasad Yadav filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking to raise all grounds of his case at a later stage. The petitioner also had an interim protection order dated 12‑12‑2024. The court, after hearing counsel, granted permission to withdraw the present application and allowed …
The petitioner, Manish Singh, was charged in Complaint Case No. 2040 of 2010 for alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 384 IPC relating to a commercial dispute over diesel pump sets supplied to the Bihar State Ward Board. The petitioner contended that the matter was essentially …
Petitioner Krishna Deo Kumar Singh sought quashing of FIR No. 25 of 2020 registered at Taraiya Police Station, which alleged offences under IPC sections 420, 406, 506 and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioner contended that an offence under Section 138 can only be pursued by …
The petitioners, four brothers from Nuruddinganj, filed a petition in 2019 seeking to quash FIR No. 175 of 2018 registered at Sitamarhi Police Station. The petition was filed before the charge-sheet was filed and cognizance taken. During the hearing on 29‑01‑2026, counsel for the petitioners argued …
The petitioner Sanjay Kumar was charged under Section 498A IPC and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act in Rampur P.S. Case No. 243 of 2016. He was granted provisional bail by the High Court on 15‑05‑2017, but the lower court cancelled his bail bonds on 24‑01‑2018 after an informant alleged …
The petitioner, Daroga Kumar Sharma, filed an application seeking to quash the order dated 08-02-2019 passed by the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Munger, which arose from a case investigating alleged forgery of his matriculation certificate. The prosecution, based on a report from the …
The petitioner Sanjay Kumar was charged under Section 498A IPC and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act in Rampur P.S. Case No. 243 of 2016. He was granted provisional bail by the High Court on 15‑05‑2017, but the lower court cancelled his bail bonds on 24‑01‑2018 after an informant alleged …
The petitioner, Veer Singh, filed an application seeking to quash FIR No.117 of 2019 registered at Balia Police Station. The application was pending before the High Court when the lower court had already disposed of the proceedings on 18 December 2023. The Court observed that since the matter had …
Dev Kumar filed an application seeking to quash the order dated 16 July 2019 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge in a criminal case (Case No. 146 of 2019). The High Court examined the status report and found that charges had already been framed and the trial was pending argument. …
The appellant, Nandan Singh, a juvenile aged below eighteen, was charged under IPC sections 341, 323, 302/34 for assaulting an informant's family, during which a co‑accused stabbed the informant's brother who later died. The appellant contended that, as a child in conflict with law, he is entitled …
The appellant, a juvenile, was charged with looting a jewellery shop and murdering the owner, along with seven other alleged offences in Patna. He filed an application for bail against the order of the Special Judge dated 08.05.2025. The High Court examined whether bail could be granted to a minor …
The petitioners, Ashish Kumar and others, filed a quashing application challenging an order arising from a 2017 case in Munger. The court examined whether the quashing application was maintainable. It held that the application was not maintainable and directed the petitioners to convert it into an …
The petitioners, including Dharmendra Yadav and others, filed an application before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and Chandani Devi. Their counsel informed the court that the dispute had been settled between the parties, and the petitioner sought to withdraw the application. The …
The petitioners Arbind Pandey and Shatrujit Pandey filed an application seeking to quash two earlier orders dated 12 March 2019 and 12 January 2012 relating to a criminal case (Goh PS Case No.126 of 2010). The petition argued that the charges had already been framed, rendering the quash application …
The petitioners, a group of members of the Ansari family, filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking quash of several criminal proceedings pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul. They asserted that the parties had reached a settlement and would not be aggrieved by the …
The petitioners, Rani Devi and Hemant Yadav, filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking to quash an order dated 30‑04‑2019 in which the SDJM, Madhepura had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 498A and 312 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act …
The petitioner, Digvijay Pratap Singh, filed an application seeking to quash the order dated 03‑07‑2019 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheohar, in a complaint alleging dishonest transfer of land. The prosecution alleged that the opposite party had given Rs 35,000 to the petitioner's elder …
The petitioner, Ramanjee Jha, challenged the seizure of his hydraulic tipper (Reg. No. BR07GC1770) and the imposition of a penalty of Rs. 8,42,000 by various mining and transport authorities, alleging that no challan, show‑cause notice or hearing was afforded. The court noted that the fine was …
The appellant, Sonu Kumar Yadav, was convicted and sentenced to three months' imprisonment. He filed a criminal appeal (SJ) No.5578 of 2019 in the Patna High Court. No counsel appeared for the appellant, and the appellant himself did not appear, having lost interest in the appeal after serving the …
The appellant Mukesh Kumar challenged the trial court’s order rejecting his discharge petition under Section 227 of the CrPC in a murder case where his brother‑in‑law was killed. The FIR named other persons, but the appellant argued he was not named and was falsely implicated due to village …
The petitioner, Phani Lal Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(4) of the B.N.S., 2023, alleging that he assaulted a victim with a spade causing grievous injury. The court examined whether the seriousness of …
The petitioner, Vijay Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in connection with a case (PS Bahera Case No. 261 of 2025) filed under Sections 109 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was …
The petitioners, Shankar Rai, Dilip Rai and Sikandar Rai, filed an anticipatory bail application in connection with Parsauni P.S. Case No. 143 of 2025, which involved offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that petitioners 1 and 2 were the order …
The petitioner, Sikandar Kumar Choudhary, was arrested in connection with offences under the Arms Act, NDPS Act and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after a police search recovered 350 grams of ganja, a pistol, a gun, illicit liquor and cash. He had been in custody since 22 July 2025 and …
The petitioner, Sarita Kumari, was accused in a case registered under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 7 of the Election Commission Act for allegedly embezzling and black‑marketing rice and wheat meant for the Public Distribution System. She filed an …
The petitioners sought bail in a dowry‑death case (Guthani P.S. Case No.250 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Section 80, 3(5) of the BNS and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Petitioners 1 and 2 withdrew their bail application and were directed to surrender within four weeks and apply …
The petitioner, Rigendra Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Baikunthpur P.S. Case No. 105 of 2022) involving alleged offences under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 498A, 406 and 34 of the IPC. The informant, Soni Kumari, alleged physical and mental torture by the …
The petitioner, Ajay Sada, feared arrest in a case (Mahishi P.S. No.17 of 2025) alleging offences under the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that a person named Sadhu Sada abducted the informant’s daughter, while the petitioner asserted he was falsely …
Ramkrit Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 61(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 25(1‑b)a and 26 of the Arms Act. He was alleged to have falsely implicated another person by producing illegal arms. The court examined whether the …
The petitioners, six individuals from Saguniya village, were implicated in Dhoraiya Police Station Case No.83 of 2023 for offences under sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 354 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code, involving rioting and assault. They filed an application for anticipatory bail, …
The petitioner, Vicky Kumar, sought bail fearing arrest in a complaint (No. 13236(C) of 2024) filed under Sections 115(2), 118(2), 303(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly taking Rs. 92,000 and a pen‑drive from a laboratory in February 2024. The complaint was lodged only in …
The petitioner, Dinesh Prasad, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a 2015 case (Shikarpur P.S. No. 264) involving offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 387. The case listed 22 accused, but the police investigation concluded with a final report exonerating the petitioner. The High …
Kajal Kumari and Ramayan Mahto applied for anticipatory bail in connection with PS Daraunda Case No. 224 of 2025, which alleged offences under several sections of the B.N.S. The petitioners claimed innocence and alleged false implication, with petitioner 1 being a woman facing general allegations. …
The petitioners, Raj Kumar Bhuiyan, Govind Bhuiyan and Subash Bhuiyan, filed an application before the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, the petitioners were arrested. Their counsel then sought to withdraw the application, stating it had become infructuous. The Court noted that …
Rahish Paswan was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case (PS Kusheshwar Asthan Case No. 199 of 2025) under Sections 137(2), 96 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that he kidnapped a girl, but the victim’s statement indicated that she had voluntarily eloped …
Mantosh Rai, husband of a woman who was allegedly killed for dowry, sought relief from imminent arrest in a case filed under Sections 80(2), 238 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He informed the court that the couple had four children, who were residing with his family, and that the deceased …
The petitioner, Deepak Sahni, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 25(1‑B)a and 26 of the Arms Act, where a looted pistol was allegedly recovered from his motorcycle. The prosecution alleged that the weapon …
Vikash Kumar was initially implicated in a murder case (Pipariya P.S. Case No.31 of 2019) under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. After investigation, the final report exonerated him, but the magistrate proceeded to take cognizance despite the exoneration. Fearing arrest, the petitioner …
The petitioner, Yansh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a complaint (No. 490(C) of 2024) filed under Section 85 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita alleging assault and torture of a victim for dowry. The prosecution alleged his involvement, while the petitioner claimed innocence. The …
The petitioners, Meera Devi and Arti Devi, were accused of killing the daughter of an informant in a dowry dispute, under sections 80 and 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. They filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438(2) of the CrPC. Meera Devi withdrew her application and was directed to …
The petitioner, Chhotelal Yadav, was apprehended for alleged looting of Rs.3000 from an informant's cash counter under Section 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He feared arrest in connection with PS Case No. 09 of 2025. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the parties had amicably settled …
Petitioner Raushan Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Sarai P.S. Case No. 221/2025) alleging offences under Sections 85, 103(2) and 3(5) of the BNSS, with the prosecution alleging he killed his wife. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the wife actually died of dengue, the …
The petitioner, Md. Amir, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No. 1004 of 2025) alleging violation of Section 65(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Sections 9 and 10 of the Child Marriage Prohibition Act, and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly marrying an under‑aged …
The petitioner, Pankaj Jha, sought anticipation bail in connection with a criminal case (PS Case No. 137 of 2025) alleging assault and discharge of a firearm, resulting in the victim sustaining fractures and gunshot injuries. The charges were framed under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109(1), 118(2) and …
Manish Paswan applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No.67/2025) involving multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, including assault causing grievous injury. The prosecution alleged that he had assaulted the victim, and the offences were serious in nature. The …
The petitioner, Kanhaiya Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Warisaliganj No. 320 of 2025) involving alleged offences under several sections of the B.N.S., including assault causing a lacerated wound. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner assaulted Shanker Kumar, while …
The petitioner, Atiullah Ansari, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry harassment case filed under Section 85 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and others assaulted the victim to demand dowry. The petitioner pleaded innocence and …
The petitioners, Madhavi Kumari and Aman Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in Teghra P.S. Case No. 50 of 2025, which alleged offences under several sections of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged they assaulted an informant's husband, while the petitioners claimed innocence and alleged …
Malo Devi, the mother‑in‑law of a deceased individual, was implicated in a dowry‑related homicide under Sections 80(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. She filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in connection with PS Hilsa Case …
The petitioner, Anup Kumar Ram, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (PS Ramnagar Case No. 22 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 329(3), 126(2), 115(2), 103(2), 351(2) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that …
The petitioner, Ranjay Kumar, feared arrest in a criminal case (PS Case No. 111 of 2025) for alleged illegal consumption of electricity under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003. The prosecution alleged that he had connected a wire to the main LT line without a valid connection. The petitioner …
Satish Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after his motorcycle was used by Kundan Kumar to transport brown sugar, violating sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the NDPS Act. The petitioner claimed he had sold the motorcycle to Kundan and that the registration had not been transferred to the buyer’s name. …
Meghanath Yadav (Nilesh Kumar) sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered as Bhanas P.S. Case No. 28 of 2025, which alleged offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that eight accused assaulted a victim, causing …
Brajesh Kumar petitioned the Patna High Court for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in connection with a criminal case (Civil Lines P.S. Case No. 92 of 2025) alleging offences under sections 351(2), 351(3), 85 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry …
Lalendra Prasad and his wife Vimla Devi sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in Hilsa Police Station Case No. 487 of 2025 for alleged assault and dowry‑related killing of a deceased woman, offences charged under Sections 80(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution …
The petitioners, Bali Sah, Satyandra Sah and Anita Devi, feared arrest in a criminal case (PS Basantpur Case No. 402 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, including assault. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners assaulted the victim, while the …
The petitioner, Akhilesh Kumar Thakur, feared arrest in a 2016 case (PS No.46) involving multiple IPC offences (Sections 448, 341, 326, 307, 379, 506/34) and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He claimed innocence, stating that the dispute had been settled as the parties are agnates. The informant …
The petitioner, Mukesh Singh, applied for anticipatory bail after being arrested in Navinagar for alleged offences under sections 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and sections 25(1‑B)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act for possessing a country‑made pistol. The court examined …
The petitioners Hare Krishna Manjhi and Randhir Manjhi sought bail in a criminal case (PS Chapra Muffasil Case No. 460 of 2025) where Randhir was charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly assaulting a victim with a Daab. The petitioners withdrew the bail application …
Arpi Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 309(6) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, alleging that he was falsely implicated and that another accused had named him in a self‑inculpatory statement. The petitioner claimed a clean antecedent and …
The petitioner, Jay Shankar Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (Bhawanipur P.S. Case No. 220 of 2025) involving multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and others assaulted the victim, causing grievous …
Shubham Kumar, also known as Shubham Singh, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a kidnapping case (Shivsagar P.S. Case No. 260 of 2025) under Sections 137(2) and 140(3) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that he had kidnapped the victim, while the petitioner asserted his innocence, …
The petitioner, Soni Kumari, was accused in Patliputra Police Station Case No. 383 of 2018 of manufacturing a forged appointment letter, invoking IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 379 and 34. She feared arrest and applied for anticipatory bail. The State opposed the bail, emphasizing the seriousness …
The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a case registered under Sections 8 and 20(b)(ii)(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. The police, acting on information, raided his residence and discovered dried ganja, leading to the …
Rinki Devi, the daughter‑in‑law of the informant, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in PS‑212/2025 where she is accused of torturing and killing a pregnant woman. The prosecution alleges her involvement in the death, while she contends the deceased died of a heart attack and she has been …
The petitioners, Ruksana Khatun and Kamre Rai, feared arrest in a criminal case (Laheriasarai PS Case No. 274 of 2025) alleging assault under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act. They contended they were falsely implicated and that the matter had been settled between the parties …
Petitioner Ravi Ram applied for bail fearing arrest in Bagaha P.S. Case No. 221 of 2025, which alleged offences under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act. He asserted innocence, claimed the injury to the victim was simple, and maintained a clean criminal record. The court …
The petitioner, Md. Allauddin, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a 2016 case (PS No. 158) filed under Sections 401, 413, 414, 467 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged theft and related offences. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner committed theft after conducting …
The petitioners Sunil Sahni and Pramod Sahni applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that the informant was assaulted with an iron rod and lathi, and …
The petitioners, Shambhu Das and his family members, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in Bisfi Police Station Case No. 185 of 2025, which alleged offences under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners had assaulted the victim, while …
The petitioner, Ajit Kumar Singh, feared arrest under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act in connection with a police case (Raghopur P.S. Case No. 164 of 2025) and filed a criminal writ petition seeking quashing of the FIR. The Patna High Court, on 28 July 2025, ordered that no coercive steps …
The petitioner, Bhishma Singh, filed an application fearing arrest in connection with Didarganj Police Station Case No. 423 of 2023, which was originally registered under IPC Sections 341, 323, 379, 506/34 and later taken in cognizance under Section 307 (attempt to murder). The prosecution alleged …
The petitioner, Payal Kumari, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a case alleging her involvement in her husband's suicide, charged under Sections 103(1), 3(5) and 305 of the B.N.S. The State and the informant opposed the bail, arguing the seriousness of the allegations. The petitioner’s …
The petitioner, Md. Guljar Alam, sought bail fearing arrest in a case (Roshna P.S. Case No. 63 of 2025) filed under Section 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The co‑accused alleged that the petitioner had sold the pistol involved in an accidental firing. The …
The petitioners, five brothers from Devkuli village, feared arrest in connection with PS Brahmapur Case No. 213 of 2025, which alleged assault under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable and Settlement Act (BNSS). The prosecution alleged that petitioners 1, 2 and 3 had assaulted the victim, while …
The petitioners, a father and his two sons, applied for anticipatory bail after their names surfaced during the investigation of a police assault case (Vishnupad P.S. Case No.173 of 2025). The FIR did not name them, but they were alleged to be involved in offences punishable under multiple sections …
Vishwajeet Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No. 398 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 118(1), 317(2), 303(2), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, where he is alleged to have assaulted a victim with a stick causing a …
Vinay Kumar, a security guard, was accused of stealing paddy worth Rs.10 lakh and had confessed to the offence. He filed an anticipatory bail application under Sections 61(2), 303(2), 318(4), 316(5) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, fearing arrest in PS‑Nemdarganj Case No.279 of 2025. The …
The petitioners, Nitish Kumar Yadav and Rambhajjo Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly assaulting an informant with a rod. The prosecution opposed the bail, …
The petitioner, Sardar Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving offences under Sections 147, 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 379 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that Kumar and others brutally assaulted Surendra Yadav, causing a fractured left …
The petitioner Mukesh Kumar filed an application to quash the order dated 14‑06‑2018 of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, which had taken cognizance of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for a bounced cheque of Rs.2,75,000. The prosecution alleged that the …
The petitioners, Md. Habib and Md. Zakir Hussain, filed an application in the High Court of Patna in a criminal miscellaneous case. Their counsel, Mr. Raj Kumar, sought permission to withdraw the application. The Court, after hearing, granted the permission. Consequently, the application was …
The petitioners Sunil Kumar Singh, Banaras Singh and Priyanka Singh filed an application seeking interim protection in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding. They later moved the court to withdraw that application and requested liberty to raise all grounds at the charge‑framing stage. The learned …
The petitioners sought quashing of an order dated 04‑08‑2016 passed by the Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa, in connection with PS case No. 168 of 2015, alleging false implication in a theft and assault case and claiming the order was issued in a printed format without proper sanction. The …
The petitioners sought to quash the order dated 25.02.2021 of the Additional Session Judge which had taken cognizance of offences under sections 363, 366A, 376/34 of the IPC and section 4 of the POSCO Act against them in a kidnapping case. The complaint was lodged by Sintu Kumar Pandit alleging that …
The petitioner, Sub‑Inspector Sanjay Kumar, filed an application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. and Article 226 seeking quashing of FIR No. 388 of 2018 registered at Sirdalla Police Station for alleged offences under Sections 225(A), 225(B), 201, 188 of the IPC and Sections 51, 52 of the Bihar …
Vikash Kumar Singh filed an application in the Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous matter against the State of Bihar and Keshav Kumar Jha. During the hearing on 27-01-2026, the petitioner’s counsel sought to withdraw the application, requesting liberty to raise all grounds at a later stage. …
Manish Kumar filed a petition seeking to quash the order dated 31.03.2018 of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, relating to Begusarai Town Police Station Case No.724 of 2017. The petitioner, along with the informant, submitted that the dispute with the opposite party had been settled to …
Petitioners Raghvir Sharan and Brajendra Kumar Singh filed an application before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar. The court directed the State’s counsel to file a counter‑affidavit within eight weeks and ordered the petitioners to submit a copy of their brief to the State counsel by …
Nitu Sinha filed a petition under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking maintenance for herself and her daughter after her husband, Awdhesh Kumar Sinha, concealed his prior marriage and later ceased financial support. The Family Court had rejected her maintenance claim, prompting her to …
The petitioner, Sachcidanand Singh, filed an application before the Patna High Court. During the hearing on 27-01-2026, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the application, arguing that it had become infructuous. The court examined the request and found that the application indeed …
Alok Kumar filed an application seeking to quash the order of the Additional Sessions Judge that rejected his revision and the order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate taking cognizance of offences under Sections 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The complaint, filed by his sister Shobha Kumari, …
The petitioner, Kumar Vivek, was charged under IPC sections 323, 307, 498A, 34 and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for alleged dowry demands, cruelty, and an attempted murder of his wife, Namrata Kumari. The FIR alleged that the bride's family was forced to pay a car and Rs. 11 lakh as dowry, …
The petitioners, a group of accused persons, filed an application to quash the order dated 10 July 2019 of the Judicial Magistrate which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 307, 379, 504 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act arising from a complaint by Satendra Kumar …
The petitioner, Dr. Avinash Kumar Sharan, sought to quash the order dated 16‑04‑2019 by the Chief Judicial Magistrate that took cognizance of an alleged homicide under Section 304 of the IPC based on a complaint that the deceased died after an injection at his clinic. The prosecution had filed a …
The petitioners, a junior engineer and a technical assistant employed under Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, filed an application to quash the order of cognizance and summons dated 15‑04‑2019 issued by the CJM, Nawada, in a complaint alleging misappropriation of funds, demand for a commission, assault and …
The petitioners sought quashing of a magistrate's order that issued summons against them under IPC sections 147, 323, 379 and 34 for alleged assault and theft on disputed land. The prosecution alleged that the accused entered the complainant's land, plucked fruits, assaulted the complainant's son …
The petitioners sought to quash an order dated 21‑08‑2019 that discharged a prosecution witness (PW‑2) without allowing the defence to cross‑examine her in a rape‑case (IPC §§376, 34). The trial court had discharged the witness because the petitioners' senior counsel failed to appear for …
The petitioner, Nand Kumar Singh, was charged under IPC sections 406, 420 and 504 following a complaint by Binay Kumar alleging that the petitioner failed to execute a sale deed after receiving full payment for land. The petitioner contended that the dispute was purely contractual and that the …
The petitioners, Rajendra Prasad and Meena Devi, filed an application seeking to quash the order dated 21‑06‑2019 of the Judicial Magistrate‑Ist Class, Begusarai, which had taken cognizance of offences under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Domestic Violence Act against …
Shivshankar Kaushik Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. was awarded a sand‑ghat contract by Bihar State Mining Corporation Ltd. and began mining. The Managing Director later issued a notice levying a penalty of Rs.96,97,705 for allegedly excavating sand beyond the permitted area, without issuing a show‑cause …
The petitioners filed applications seeking to quash a order dated 24 May 2018 by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class‑cum‑Principal Magistrate, Madhepura, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 417, 420, 448, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code arising from a land‑pond dispute. The …
The petitioner, Sunil Kumar Paswan, filed an application challenging a High Court order dated 20‑08‑2019 that took cognizance of the offence only against two of the nine accused persons. The petitioner sought to have cognizance taken against the remaining accused (OP Nos. 2‑9). The learned counsel …
The petitioner, Brajendra Kumar Singh, paid full consideration for a piece of land and obtained possession, but when he sought registration the accused refused to execute the sale deed, assaulted him and threatened his life, alleging cheating. He filed a criminal complaint invoking IPC sections 420, …
Petitioner Ranjit Kumar filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking permission to withdraw the pending application. The learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Prashant Sinha, requested the court's leave to withdraw. The court, after hearing, granted the permission to withdraw. …
The petitioners Veena Devi and Pammi Kumari, both women, were charged under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting an informant. They filed an application seeking quash of the charge‑framing order dated 23‑09‑2019 passed by the Additional …
The petitioners sought to quash a May 24, 2018 order of the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class‑cum‑Principal Magistrate, Madhepura, which had taken cognizance of offences under IPC Sections 417, 420, 448, 504 and 506 arising from a complaint about a pond on disputed land. The complainant alleged that …
The petitioners filed an application in the Patna High Court seeking relief in a criminal miscellaneous matter. During the hearing on 27-01-2026, counsel for the petitioners requested to withdraw the application while retaining the liberty to raise all their grounds at a later stage. The Court …
The petitioner, Sunil Kumar Yadav, filed an application seeking quash of FIR No. 184/2018 registered at Sirdalla Police Station and the ensuing investigation under Sections 467, 468, 471, 474, 420, 353 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. The State argued that the counter‑affidavit had been filed …
Petitioner Neel Kamal Bharti filed an application seeking quash of FIR No. 131/2018 alleging offences under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code for alleged embezzlement through fraudulent birth certificates. The prosecution alleged misappropriation of about Rs. 10 lakh, while the petitioner’s …
The petitioners sold a parcel of land to the complainant, promising to hand over possession after the sale deed was executed, but thereafter refused to deliver possession and threatened the complainant. The complainant filed a criminal complaint, leading to an order dated 25.01.2018 by the Judicial …
The petitioner, Vishal Bharti, filed an application seeking to quash the order dated 29 January 2021 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge in Sessions Trial No. 793 of 2019. The prosecution alleged that after a marriage settlement, the informant had a physical relationship with the …
Ajay Kumar petitioned the Patna High Court for quashment of the order dated 03‑12‑2024 that authorized the seizure of his payloader (Reg. No. BR24GA‑6919) in connection with an illegal sand‑mining case (Barun PS Case No 366 of 2022) and for its release. Earlier, the court had directed him to file a …
Nirmal Singh filed a writ petition seeking the quashment of an order that had impounded his payloader (vehicle) on suspicion of involvement in illegal sand mining under sections 379 and 411 of the IPC and various mining regulations. The petitioner was earlier directed to approach the Mines …
Arun Kumar, the in‑charge headmaster of an upgraded middle school in Virupur, was alleged to have misappropriated Rs 18,23,609 released for the construction of six additional classrooms. The Block Education Officer reported the alleged misappropriation, leading to the registration of an FIR under …
The petitioner, Ranjan Kumar Mishra, filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking to set aside an order dated 06.01.2021 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑3, Patna, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 341, 323, 379, 504 and 506/34 of the IPC against …
The petitioner, Nayeemasraf @ Mohammad Nayeem Ashraf, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition (No. 52205 of 2019) against the State of Bihar. The petitioner’s counsel was permitted to add the informant as Opposite Party No. 02. The court directed that a notice be issued to the newly added opposite …
The petitioners filed an application in the Patna High Court relating to a criminal miscellaneous case and later sought to withdraw it, requesting liberty to raise all grounds at a later stage. The court allowed the withdrawal, noting that any future application would be examined by the lower court …
The petitioner, Shambhu Kumar, filed an application seeking to quash a maintenance order of Rs.10,000 per month dated 2 May 2016, which was affirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge. The High Court examined the order and found no illegality, noting that the petitioner, as the husband of the …
The petitioner, Sohel Kumar Soni, filed an application seeking to quash the cognizance order dated 29‑01‑2019 in a dowry‑related complaint (Case No. 305 of 2018) that alleged he tortured his wife for dowry, invoking IPC sections 498A and 494 and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner …
Petitioner Rajeev Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry harassment complaint (Sections 498A IPC and 4 Dowry Prohibition Act). The prosecution alleged that he and co‑accused tortured the informant for dowry. The petitioner claimed innocence, no prior criminal record, and that the …
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case (PS Case No. 98 of 2024) alleging offences under Sections 341, 323, 498A, 504, 506, 379 r/w 34 of the IPC and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, where he is accused of assaulting a victim to demand dowry. The petitioner …
Mahendra Prasad, a Daftari in the Sub‑Registrar's office, was implicated in a case (PS Case No. 616 of 2024) for alleged manipulation of government records under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and false implication. The …
The petitioner, Jay Kumar Yadav, filed an application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding before the Patna High Court. The petitioner sought the Court’s permission to withdraw that application. The Court, exercising its discretion, granted the request for withdrawal. Consequently, the application …
The petitioner, Golu Kumar, was accused of molesting a 13‑year‑old girl under multiple provisions of the Bihar Penal Code, the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming that the parties had settled the dispute, a view supported by the informant's counsel. The court, …
The petitioner, Rajesh Kumar, a municipal employee, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 406 and 409 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged defalcation of Rs. 6,65,912. The High Court examined the seriousness of the alleged financial loss and the nature of …
Santosh Kumar sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a complaint (Case No. 119C of 2023) alleging his involvement in assault, torture, and dowry harassment under IPC sections 323, 341, 504, 498A and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner claimed innocence and feared …
The petitioner, Ravi Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with a case registered under Section 27 of the Arms Act and several sections of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly firing at individuals, causing injuries. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner fired in the air …
The petitioners, Bipat Rai and Avadesh Ray, filed anticipatory bail applications fearing arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.572 of 2024, which alleged offences of extortion, criminal breach of trust, cheating, false evidence and a provision of the CPC. The prosecution alleged that the …
The petitioners, a group of seven individuals from Asudhan Ke Mathiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with a criminal case (PS Case No. 22 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 191(2), 190, 115(2), 126, 351(2) and 109 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that …
The petitioner, Vivek Sharma, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a murder case (PS Case No. 663 of 2024) where he was accused under Section 140(3) of the BNS, with additional charges under Sections 103(1) and 238. The prosecution alleged he killed his wife, while the petitioner claimed …
The petitioner, Dheeraj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry harassment case (Complaint No. 941 of 2024) under Sections 498A read with 34 of the IPC. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and others assaulted the victim to demand dowry. The petitioner claimed innocence and …
Petitioner Raj Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry harassment case (Section 498A IPC) arising from Complaint No. 1309 of 2024. The prosecution alleged that Raj Kumar and others assaulted the victim to demand dowry. The petitioner claimed innocence and filed an application for …
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar Singh, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a Piro police case (No. 417 of 2023) involving alleged extortion under IPC sections 386, 387, 504, 506/34. The prosecution alleges that the petitioner demanded ransom, while his counsel argues that the mobile used …
The petitioners, Chhotu @ Md. Mustafa and Noor Alam @ Md Nur Alam, sought anticipatory bail in two criminal miscellaneous cases (Nos. 44458 and 45111 of 2025) arising from PS Case No. 349 of 2024, where they were accused of forcing a victim to sell mixed petrol and diesel and, upon resistance, …
The petitioner, Om Prakash Ram, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry harassment case (Complaint No. 1030 of 2015) alleging offences under IPC Section 498A and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and others assaulted the victim to demand dowry. The …
Krishnandan Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related case (Sikandara P.S. Case No. 25 of 2023) that alleged offences under IPC sections 498(a), 323, 307, 504, 379 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and others assaulted and …
The petitioner, Ankit Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with a criminal case (PS Case No. 120 of 2025) involving alleged offences under several sections of the BNS. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with three others, stabbed the victim. The High …
The petitioners, Bipat Rai and Avadesh Ray, filed anticipatory bail applications fearing arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.572 of 2024, which alleged offences of extortion, criminal breach of trust, cheating, false evidence and a provision of the CPC. The prosecution alleged that the …
The petitioner, Upendar Kumar Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 406, 409 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly defrauding a micro‑finance company of Rs. 2 lakhs. The prosecution alleged criminal breach of trust, dishonest …
The petitioner, Md. Shabbir, sought bail fearing arrest in a case (Bihta P.S. Case No. 283 of 2025) involving multiple offences under the Bihar Penal Code and the Arms Act, including assault with a pistol. The prosecution alleged that he struck an informant on the head with the butt of a pistol, …
The petitioners, Chhotu @ Md. Mustafa and Noor Alam @ Md Nur Alam, sought anticipatory bail in two criminal miscellaneous cases (Nos. 44458 and 45111 of 2025) arising from PS Case No. 349 of 2024, where they were accused of forcing a victim to sell mixed petrol and diesel and, upon resistance, …
The petitioner, Amish Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related assault case (PS Case No. 183 of 2024) involving multiple offences under the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act (BNS) and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and others …
The petitioner, Md Babu Ali, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related case (Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 246 of 2024) where he was alleged to have assaulted and tortured a victim for dowry. The prosecution charged him under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 …
The petitioner, Neelam Kumari, was named in an FIR for alleged forgery of an appointment letter related to a GNM post, invoking IPC sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471/34. She contended that she had no knowledge of the forged document and played no role in its creation. The State opposed her request …
The petitioner, Jitu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a Shahpur police case (No. 142 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 8(c) and 21(a) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. The prosecution alleged that two persons were arrested with 'smack' …
