Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
3365 judgments · newest first · showing 2601–2800
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Kudhani P.S. Case No. 457/2023) alleged under Sections 302, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He had been in custody since 19-11-2023 and previously applied for bail, which was rejected by the Patna High Court on …
Santosh Kumar was charged under IPC sections 341, 323, 324, 302, 504 and 506/34 for stabbing a victim in a trivial dispute. He has been in custody since July 2023 and the trial has already commenced with two witnesses examined. The petitioner sought regular bail for the second time after an earlier …
The petitioner, Rakesh Yadav, was charged under IPC sections 302 (murder), 307/34 (attempt to murder) and Arms Act section 27. He sought regular bail for the second time after an earlier bail denial. The court examined the investigation report which indicated that the petitioner actively …
The petitioner, Akshay Kumar, was arrested in connection with an ATM loot gang and was found in possession of an iron cutter, a country-made pistol, magazines, live cartridges, ATM cards, cheque books and pass-books. He was charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (310(4), …
The petitioner, Manish Kumar Rai, was charged under Sections 395 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly looting Rs. 8 lakh from a bank, with his name appearing in a co-accused's confessional statement. He has fourteen prior criminal antecedents of a similar nature. The trial court framed …
The petitioner, Suresh Gaddi, was arrested on 24 July 2024 in connection with a police case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. He had previously applied for bail, which was denied by the Patna High Court on 22 January 2025. In a second bail application, …
Ankit Kumar was charged under sections 126(2), 115, 303(2), 308(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for alleged extortion and assault on vehicle owners. He has been in custody since 23‑12‑2024 and has six prior criminal convictions. The petitioner sought regular bail for …
Ram Rai was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 21(b), 23(b) and 29 of the NDPS Act after 102 grams of brown sugar was recovered from his possession. He applied for bail for the second time, having already been denied bail on 10 July 2024. The Patna High Court noted that the …
The petitioner, Ravi Shankar Kumar, was arrested on 8 January 2025 for allegedly looting two mobile phones and Rs.31,500, charged under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. He had been in custody for several months after his earlier bail application was rejected on 12 May 2025. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Roushan Kumar, was charged under Sections 103(1), 61(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for a daylight murder in which several accused fired at a victim, resulting in a fatal gunshot wound. He applied for regular bail, arguing that only one of the three shooters caused …
Ashish Kumar was arrested in connection with a case involving the disappearance of his four‑month‑old son and wife, alleged under IPC sections 363, 302, 201, 120(B) and 34. He claimed he was falsely implicated due to enmity and asserted no prior criminal record. The State argued that the victims had …
The petitioner, Upendra Kumar, was arrested in connection with an alleged honour killing of his sister and charged under Sections 103, 238(a) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. His earlier bail application was rejected on the ground that he was a brother of the deceased and allegedly …
The petitioner, Lilawati Devi, mother‑in‑law of the deceased, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 103(1), 80(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. She had been in custody since 7 September 2024 and only one witness had been examined, indicating a substantial delay …
The petitioner, Prabhat Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code for a robbery at a State Bank of India cash centre. The prosecution alleged that four miscreants snatched Rs. 32,000 along with Aadhaar and voter ID cards, and the petitioner’s name …
The petitioner, Budhdeo Rai, filed an application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding before the Patna High Court. During the hearing on 10-02-2026, the petitioner’s counsel, Dr. Kamal Deo Sharma, requested to withdraw the application. The court permitted the withdrawal. Consequently, the …
Shiv Ram Sah, the father of a deceased girl, was charged under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for murder and Section 27 of the Arms Act for illegal possession of a weapon. The prosecution alleged that he hired a co‑accused to kill his daughter. He applied for regular bail, which was first …
The petitioner, Purushottam Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged cyber fraud involving fake bank accounts. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner opened multiple accounts using a false address and …
The petitioner sought regular bail in a case registered under Sections 392 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging innocence despite being caught committing loot at a CSP centre and having twelve prior serious criminal cases. The prosecution presented that the looted articles and cash were …
The petitioner, Ranjeet Mahto, was charged under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 302 and 120(B) and Section 27 of the Arms Act in a case registered in 2020. He had previously applied for bail, which was rejected in February 2023, and sought a second bail order. The court noted that the petitioner has …
Petitioners Pintu Kumar and Chotu Kumar filed an application seeking modification of a bail order dated 24-12-2025, which had been passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 88660 of 2025 under Section 528 of the BNSS. The application was filed on behalf of petitioner No. 02 (Chotu Kumar) in the Galgaliya …
The petitioner, Ravindra Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, with a recovered country‑made pistol and live cartridges, and is already facing 23 similar serious cases. He applied for regular bail for the second time after his …
Raja Kumar was charged under Sections 395 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code for dacoity and concealment of stolen property. He filed a second bail application (Cr. Misc. No.6398 of 2025) after an earlier bail plea was rejected on 29‑02‑2024. The State argued that all witnesses had already been …
The petitioner, Sohail Ahmad, was arrested in connection with a robbery (Section 394 IPC) involving the looting of a medicine shop and is also implicated in six other serious cases. He applied for regular bail, citing prolonged custody since June 2023 and delay in trial. The State argued that the …
The petitioner, Md. Chand Md. Rasid, applied for bail in a case registered under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code concerning a serious offence. The application was the second attempt after an earlier bail denial on 26 June 2024. The petitioner argued for bail on the grounds of custodial …
Karan Ram was arrested on 30 September 2023 in connection with a murder case under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and for an offence under Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR was lodged based on the brother of the deceased, and subsequently the wife of the deceased and an independent …
The petitioner, Khushed Mistri, filed an application for bail in a murder case (Lalmaniya P.S. Case No.43 of 2024) where he is accused under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, with cognizance also taken under Sections 341, 323, 302, 504/34 IPC. The prosecution alleges that the petitioner, …
The petitioner, Munil Patel, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly snatching a motorcycle. He has been in custody since October 2023 and has prior criminal antecedents. The petitioner applied for bail, arguing that the trial was …
Mukesh Paswan was charged with murder, criminal conspiracy and illegal possession of arms under Sections 302, 120(B) of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for bail for the second time after an earlier bail denial. The court noted that the petitioner was the assailant, had prior …
Lal Bachan Sahni was charged under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act for a murder case arising from a 2019 police report. The petitioner filed a second bail application in the Patna High Court after an earlier bail denial on 5 March 2024. The State opposed …
Robins Singh was charged under Sections 302 and 392 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act in a case registered as PS. Case No. 272 of 2023. He applied for regular bail for the first time, which was rejected on 31 July 2024. He filed a second bail application before the Patna High …
The petitioners, Md. Imamuddin Khan and Md. Tanvir, were charged under IPC Section 302 for murder and under Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 27 of the Arms Act. They sought bail for the second time after an earlier bail application was rejected on the ground of their alleged involvement in the killing of …
Raj Kumar Sahani was charged under Sections 302, 34 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code for a murder case. He filed his third application for regular bail before the Patna High Court while the trial was ongoing and five witnesses had already been examined. The petitioner argued that bail should be …
The petitioner, Satyendra Mahto, filed an application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding arising from PS Case No. 65 of 2023 in Maker, Saran. The application was opposed by the State of Bihar and Binod Devi. During the hearing on 9 February 2026, counsel for the petitioner sought permission to …
The petitioner, Santa Paswan, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code concerning the theft of a motorcycle and a mobile phone. The prosecution's case includes a self‑inculpatory confession of a co‑accused that implicates the petitioner, and he is …
The petitioner, Md. Heera, was charged under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code (dacoity) and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly snatching money from an informant. He applied for regular bail for the second time after an earlier bail denial. The prosecution presented material, including a …
Manish Kumar was arrested in connection with a case involving damage to Indian Oil’s petroleum and gas pipelines, alleged use of explosives, and other offenses. He is charged under IPC sections 379, 511, 427, 285 and 120(B), as well as sections 15(2) and 15(4) of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipeline …
Petitioner Raushan Kumar Sah was accused in a complaint under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504 and the Dowry Prohibition Act for demanding dowry and assaulting the complainant. He contended that the allegations were false and that the dispute had been resolved through a one‑time settlement reflected in a …
Mukesh Kumar Singh filed an application seeking anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 406, 420 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code. The Patna High Court noted that the petitioner’s counsel had failed to comply with an earlier order dated 27 January 2026 and was allegedly misleading …
Rohit Kumar petitioned the Patna High Court seeking bail in a criminal case (Complaint No. 306 of 2023) filed by his wife Nilam Devi under Sections 498A IPC and 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The dispute is matrimonial, and both parties have agreed to dissolve the marriage under Section 13B of the …
The petitioner, Sheikh Sumer, a driver, was arrested after police intercepted a truck at a toll plaza and recovered 29,000 bottles of codeine cough syrup, leading to charges under Sections 8(C), 21(C), 25 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. The petitioner claimed innocence …
The petitioner, Santosh Kumar Sharma, applied for bail in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from PS Case No. 349 of 2023. The trial court had earlier rejected his bail application on 9 January 2026, although a provisional bail was granted to another accused, Raja Kumar, to appear for an …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar Singh, applied for regular bail in a case (S.T.R. No.163 of 2024) involving charges of murder (IPC s.302) and concealment of evidence (IPC s.201). The prosecution alleged that a dead female body was found on railway tracks, strangulated, and the informant was a …
The petitioners, Bindhyachal Tiwary and Anita Kumari, feared arrest in a 2018 complaint (Case No. 3850) alleging cheating of Rs 5 lakhs and offences under IPC sections 406 and 420/34. They claimed innocence and offered to repay the alleged amount in six equal installments of Rs 83,333 each. The …
The petitioner, Uday Mallah, was arrested in connection with a theft case (Rampur P.S. Case No. 740 of 2023) alleged under Sections 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that unknown persons broke into an informant's house and stole jewellery and cash. The petitioner had been …
The petitioner, Sudhir Krishna Kant Jha, applied for regular bail in a complaint case (CR No. 119 of 2020) alleging offences under IPC sections 323, 498A, 494, 34 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner tortured the complainant for dowry and threw her out of the …
Mithun Paswan, the petitioner, filed a bail application in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 68727 of 2025 before the Patna High Court. During the hearing on 9 February 2026, the petitioner’s counsel sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the bail application. The Court, after hearing the counsel, …
Akhilesh Kumar and Vikash Ram filed a bail application in a criminal miscellaneous case before the Patna High Court. They later approached the court seeking permission to withdraw the bail application. The learned counsel for the petitioners requested such permission, and the State's counsel was …
Ashok Mandal was charged with kidnapping for ransom under Sections 364, 364A and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner had been in custody since May 19, 2023 and earlier bail applications were rejected by the Patna High Court. He filed a fresh regular bail application, arguing that the trial …
Shambhu Manjhi was charged under Sections 376 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly raping a 10‑year‑old girl. He applied for regular bail, arguing that the trial had begun, no witnesses had yet appeared, and he had been in custody since March 2024. The …
The petitioner, Babloo Lal, was charged under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act for the murder of a collection agent. He sought bail for the second time after an earlier bail application was rejected. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner had a financial …
The petitioner, Manish Kumar (also known as Manish Singh, Manish Rai, Nanki, Jitendra Rai, Jitendra Ray, Jitendra Singh), applied for regular bail in a case registered as Bidupur Police Station Case No. 428 of 2019, which alleged offences under Sections 307 and 353 of the Indian Penal Code and …
The petitioner, Nageshwar Yadav, was arrested in January 2025 in connection with a criminal miscellaneous case. He filed an application before the Patna High Court, the nature of which is not specified, seeking relief. The informant's counsel informed the court that the petitioner had already been …
Aruni Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case registered under Sections 379, 411, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 21 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, and Section 56 of the BM (CPIMTS) Amendment Rule, 2021 for alleged illegal sand …
Mithilesh Yadav applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal complaint (Case No. 43 of 2021) alleging offences under IPC sections 498‑A, 494 and the Domestic Violence Act. The petitioner claimed innocence and submitted a settlement agreement with his wife, Meera Kumari, wherein he …
The petitioners, Nawaz Sharif and Md. Aslam, applied for regular bail in connection with a case registered under Section 310(2) of the B.N.S. 2023, alleging that they have been in custody since December 5, 2024. The prosecution alleged that six to seven persons, armed, entered the informant's house …
The petitioner, Ranjay Kumar, was charged under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 (also referenced as Section 37) of the Arms Act for allegedly threatening and assaulting a truck driver and his helper, and for looting Rs. 3,000. The prosecution presented a confessional statement …
Vishwakarma Kumar was arrested in September 2023 for firing at an informant who was demanding ransom and is charged under Sections 341, 323, 307, 386, 387, 120B, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He has nine prior criminal convictions and has been in custody since the …
Petitioner Putul Rai, the wife of a co-accused who had already been granted anticipatory bail, applied for anticipatory bail in a complaint alleging cheating and criminal breach of trust under IPC sections 406 and 34, involving a sum of Rs. 14,60,000. The petitioner argued that she had not received …
The petitioner, Sanjay Yadav, filed an application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding before the Patna High Court. The petitioner’s counsel later sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the application, stating it had become infructuous. The State of Bihar, through its APP, opposed the …
The petitioner, Ravi Gupta, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 394 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging involvement in a shooting at a jewelry shop. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with unknown persons, fired upon the …
Petitioner Raja Kumar filed an application which he later sought to withdraw. The learned counsel requested permission to withdraw, which the court granted. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn.
The petitioner, Praveen Kumar Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a murder case (Baheri P.S. Case No. 54 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the pistol used in the killing belonged …
Naushad Alam was charged under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting the father of an informant with weapons. He had previously applied for regular bail, which the Patna High Court dismissed on 23 May 2023. The petitioner renewed his bail plea, arguing that the trial …
Petitioners Mukesh Paswan and Chanchal Kumari filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking relief, but the police had already submitted the final form concerning the case. The petitioners, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw their application. The Court considered the …
The petitioners – Gurjeet Singh, Ravi Singh, Manoj Agrawal and Rinku Singh – sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with PS Ramnagar Case No. 363 of 2017, wherein they were charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code for offences including rioting, assault, and communal …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar Das, sought anticipatory bail in a complaint alleging cheating and the issuance of two bounced cheques amounting to Rs. 4,00,000, filed under Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC and Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioner offered to pay the …
The petitioners, accused in a 2017 case (PS No. 363) for offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code including public order offences and communal tension, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest. The prosecution alleged that they were involved in causing public disturbance and …
Manjeet Singh was charged under multiple IPC sections, Section 12 of the POCSO Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly kidnapping a girl who, according to his counsel, had eloped with him. The petitioner filed a second bail application after an earlier denial. The court noted that five of …
The petitioners, Jishan Alam and Abu Sahma, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a police case (Simraha P.S. Case No. 04 of 2024) that alleged their involvement in assaults causing injuries to two victims, invoking several IPC offences …
The petitioners filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court without attaching the earlier order rejecting their previous application. The court noted that the required document was not placed on record. Consequently, the court dismissed the application as withdrawn, granting …
The petitioners – Shiv Shankar Chaudhary, his wife Sunita and daughter Rinku – sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a property‑related case (Pupri P.S. Case No. 248 of 2024) filed under IPC sections 406, 420, 467, 468 and 34. The prosecution alleged that Shiv Shankar, who claimed ownership of …
The petitioner, Md. Ishaque, feared arrest in a new FIR (Bagha Patkhauli PS Case No. 788 of 2022) alleging offences under Sections 420, 409 and 120B of the IPC. He contended that the same allegations had already been raised in an earlier FIR (Case No. 499 of 2019) for which he had been granted …
The petitioner, Kameshwar Thakur, feared arrest in an excise case (PS No. 34 of 2021) filed under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. An earlier anticipatory bail application was rejected on 10‑12‑2021, and a fresh application was filed. The Court examined the …
The petitioner, Pradip Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case (PS Case No.23 of 2024) alleging his involvement in arson and extortion, including sections 143, 144, 385, 387, 335, 386 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 395, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly snatching Rs. 5,37,641 at gunpoint. The prosecution claimed that Rs. 86,000 of the looted money was recovered from the petitioner, while the petitioner asserted …
The petitioners, including Gurjeet Singh, Ravi Singh, Manoj Agrawl, and Rinku Singh, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with PS Ramnagar Case No. 363 of 2017, where they were accused of offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code relating to public order and communal tension. …
The petitioner, Renu Devi, filed an application seeking modification of an earlier order dated 21 June 2024 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 36369 of 2024. The original order had granted her a period to appear before the lower court and to seek provisional anticipatory bail, conditioned upon the …
The petitioners, Parwati Devi and Bhushankumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS 380/2022) alleging offences under Sections 406, 409 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged non‑completion and misappropriation of government scheme work. They claimed innocence, asserted …
The petitioner, Dharma Domh, was arrested in connection with a robbery (Section 392 IPC) alleged to have been committed with a pistol. His name surfaced during the investigation through a self‑incriminating statement of a co‑accused, and he is also implicated in seven other similar serious cases. He …
The petitioner, Bivek Prasad, was accused in a 2019 complaint under Section 498A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for allegedly torturing his wife and throwing her out of the matrimonial home. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and false implication. The …
The petitioners, Nawaz Sharif and Md. Aslam, were charged under Section 310(2) of the B.N.S. 2023 for allegedly entering an informant's house armed, looting jewelry and cash. Both have been in custody since 5 December 2024 and filed regular bail applications, which were previously dismissed on 16 …
The petitioners, Md. Imamuddin Khan and Md. Tanvir, were charged under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for murder and under Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 27 of the Arms Act. They had been in custody since 27‑06‑2023 and earlier sought bail, which was rejected on 09‑04‑2024. In a second bail …
The petitioners, Afzal Hussain, Kausher Ali and Sahana Khatoon, feared arrest in a Gopalganj police case (No.330 of 2024) where they were alleged to have stabbed the victim and assaulted her with a brick under IPC sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504 and 506/34. They pleaded innocence, claiming false …
The petitioner, Birju Kumar, applied for bail for an alleged offence under Sections 393, 394, 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, arising from a case registered in 2022. This was his third bail application after two earlier rejections by the Patna High Court. The …
The petitioner, Dhirendra Tanti, filed an application seeking modification of the order dated 10.08.2022 which dealt with his bail conditions. The specific relief sought was an extension of the time granted to surrender before the lower court for furnishing bail bonds, originally set by the order …
The petitioner, Ghanshyam Bhagat, sought regular bail in a 2013 case under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, Section 17 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act and Section 13 of the UAPA. Earlier bail applications were rejected on 13.12.2023 and 30.08.2023, and the petitioner argued that the …
The petitioner, Md. Faiz (also known as Md. Fariduddin Haque), sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry harassment case (IPC Sec. 498 and Dowry Prohibition Act Sec. 4) filed in 2019. The prosecution alleged that he demanded dowry and tortured his wife, and also raised the issue of three …
The petitioner, Ashutosh Kumar, was charged under Sections 376, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 6 of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a minor. He filed a second bail application after an earlier bail request was rejected. The prosecution alleged serious offences involving a minor, and …
The petitioners, four relatives, feared arrest in connection with a 2022 police case involving multiple IPC offences. Bail had already been granted to two of them, while the remaining two sought anticipatory bail. The petitioners informed the court that they had settled the dispute and filed a …
The petitioner, Ranjeet Kumar, was arrested on 27‑12‑2024 in connection with a violent incident involving extortion and the discharge of firearms, and is charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act. He applied for regular bail for the second time, arguing …
Ranjeet Paswan was charged under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code for robbery with hurt in Gurua P.S. Case No. 02 of 2022. He had previously applied for bail, which was rejected, and made a second bail application. The court noted that his name appeared in the self‑inculpatory statements of …
The petitioner, Raju Paswan, applied for bail in a case registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code for robbery. The High Court had earlier rejected his bail application on 7 May 2025, noting his alleged involvement in six similar serious cases and his custody since 7 December 2024. The …
The petitioner, Neeraj Kumar, was charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act for alleged gang‑related extortion of Rs. 2,59,260 from an informant. He has been in custody since 17‑12‑2024 and has five prior criminal antecedents. The …
The petitioner, Sagar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related case (Murliganj PS Case No. 454 of 2022) that alleged offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 498A, 504, 506/34 and Section 75 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The State opposed the bail application. The Court, …
The petitioner, Kunal Jha, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Chewara P.S. Case No. 13 of 2024) involving alleged purchase of looted goods under IPC sections 341, 342, 356 and 379. The prosecution alleged that four unknown persons committed the loot and that the petitioner bought the …
The petitioners Raju Paswan and Hirday Paswan applied for regular bail in a case registered under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code for robbery. Their earlier bail applications had been rejected, and they contended that no witness had been examined. The State argued that all witnesses had been …
The petitioners Raju Paswan and Hirday Paswan applied for regular bail in a case registered under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code for robbery. Their earlier bail applications had been rejected, and they contended that no witness had been examined. The State argued that all witnesses had been …
The petitioner, Devesh Kumar, filed a restoration application seeking to revive Criminal Miscellaneous No. 4477 of 2018, which had been dismissed for non‑prosecution on 21‑04‑2025, and earlier sought restoration of Criminal Miscellaneous No. 41177 of 2018 dismissed on 18‑04‑2024. No counsel appeared …
Petitioner Prakash Murmu was implicated in a complaint (CA1456 of 2023) alleging torture, assault, and a demand for Rs. 2,00,000 as dowry under Section 498A of the IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and false implication. The State …
The petitioner, Abhishek Raj, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a financial fraud case (PS Case No. 211 of 2023) involving alleged cheating, criminal breach of trust, forgery and conspiracy under various IPC sections. He claimed he had taken Rs. 13.65 lakh as consultancy fees and that a …
Shiva Paswan was charged under Sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 324, 504, 307, 379 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He filed a second bail application after an earlier denial. The court noted that five witnesses had already been examined and that remaining witnesses, including …
Manoranjan Prasad and Baby Devi filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking to raise all grounds at the stage of framing of charge. The State of Bihar and Lalmuni Devi opposed the application. The petitioners, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw the application. The Court …
Karu Singh, the petitioner, filed his fourth bail application in a Sessions trial (No.203 of 2021) concerning offences under Sections 302, 307, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The case, arising from PS Bypass Case No.220 of 2020, was reported to be on the verge of …
Tulsi Rajbhar was charged under Sections 70(1) and 324(4) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 4 and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act in connection with POCSO Case No.127 of 2024. The petitioner sought bail for the second time after an earlier bail …
The petitioner, Mintu Rajbhar, was charged under Sections 70(1) and 324(4) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act in connection with a child sexual offence. He applied for bail for the second time after an earlier bail application was rejected on 25-06-2025. The …
Sonu Kumar, husband of a deceased woman, was implicated in a murder case (Gaya Muffasil P.S. Case No. 450 of 2024) under Sections 302, 304(b), 34 and 120(b) of the IPC. Although he was not originally named in the FIR, the informant later identified him as an accused. The petitioner sought …
The petitioner, Golu, was charged under Sections 70(1) and 324(4) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act in connection with a case registered in Buxar. A bail application filed earlier was rejected on 25‑06‑2025. The petitioner made a second bail application, …
The petitioner, Anubhav Kumar, sought regular bail for offences under Sections 393, 307, 326 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, relating to a train‑loot incident where a firearm was discharged. The trial is underway with six of ten witnesses already examined. The petitioner …
The petitioners, three residents of Sanghata village, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 191, 126(2), 115(2), 118, 109, 303(2), 74, 352 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for alleged assault causing grievous injuries. The prosecution alleged …
Vishal Kumar applied for anticipatory bail in a criminal case (Taraiya P.S. Case No. 149 of 2025) where he is charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for assault causing grievous injury. The prosecution alleges that he fractured the victim's nose and also injured the …
The petitioner, Chhotu Nut, was arrested in connection with a criminal case and had previously filed an application before the Patna High Court. He later sought the court's permission to withdraw that application, citing his arrest as the reason. The petitioner was represented by Advocate Jitendra …
The petitioner, Chandan Kewat, filed an application fearing arrest in a case (Bind P.S. Case No. 178 of 2025) where he is charged under sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act and the SC/ST Act for alleged molestation of a minor. The petition …
The petitioners, a group of seven individuals from Rohtas district, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with FIR No. 131 of 2025, which alleged assault on an informant and the theft of Rs. 5,500. The prosecution charged them under Sections 191(2), 190, 109, 118(1), 303(2), …
The petitioners, Vinod Prasad and his wife Malti Devi, along with their daughters Chhatiya Devi and Priyanka Kumari, sought relief from arrest in a murder case (Sections 304B/34 IPC) registered as Dhanarua P.S. Case No. 257 of 2017. The counsel for the first two petitioners withdrew the bail …
Bhim Patel applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related complaint (Case No. 519 of 2023) that alleged offences under Sections 498A, 323, 379, 406, 504, 120B of the IPC and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that Patel and others assaulted the victim to …
The petitioners, four individuals from East Champaran, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 341, 379, 307/34 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleges that they assaulted an informant and extorted Rs. 41,000. The petitioners contended …
The petitioner, Binkatesh Kumar Rai, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related assault case (Complaint No. 1200 of 2023) alleging offences under IPC sections 323, 324, 498A/34 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner assaulted the victim to …
The petitioner, Shainki Khnuja, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a 498A dowry harassment case (Complaint No. 3006 of 2023). The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and others assaulted the victim to demand dowry. The petitioner claimed innocence and expressed willingness to maintain …
Petitioner Ravin Mandal applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related complaint (Case No. 1929 of 2018) that alleged offences under IPC sections 341, 342, 323, 498A and 494. The prosecution alleged that he assaulted the victim to demand dowry, while the petitioner claimed innocence …
Rita Kumari, a Panchayat Secretary, was implicated in Chewara Police Station Case No.5 of 2020 for alleged offences under Sections 406, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) of the IPC. The prosecution alleged irregularities in the execution of government schemes, but the police investigation concluded …
The petitioner, Sanjay Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with a criminal case (Mashrakh P.S. Case No. 322 of 2020) involving multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner assaulted a victim, causing grievous injuries, and …
Roji Begum applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a Special NDPS case where 94 gm of smokeless tobacco (smack) was recovered from her residence. She asserted innocence, clean antecedents, and highlighted that neither she nor her husband had been arrested. The State opposed the bail, citing …
Vijay Manjhi and Chhotu Manjhi sought relief fearing arrest in a case (P.S. Case No. 331 of 2024) filed under Section 96 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. They claimed that the alleged victim had eloped with them, and argued that the victim’s statement had not been properly considered. The court noted …
Abhishesk Paswan filed an application before the Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous case. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the State was represented by Mr. Amitesh Kumar, APP. The court noted the absence of any representation for the petitioner. Consequently, the …
Rupesh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a complaint case (No. 261C of 2024) filed under IPC sections 115(2), 109, 85, 305 and Section 3 of the DP Act. He claimed innocence and alleged false implication. The court, relying on the Supreme Court’s guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. …
The petitioner, Saurav Kumar, sought relief from anticipated arrest in a criminal case (Pachmahla P.S. Case No. 7 of 2025) where he was charged under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act for assaulting an informant and demanding extortion money. The …
Roushan Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (PS Kumarkhand Case No.141 of 2024) that alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, including assault and other violent crimes. The petitioner asserted his innocence, clean antecedent and sought …
The petitioner, Anjan Bharti, applied for anticipatory bail in a complaint alleging assault and torture for dowry demands under Sections 74, 85, 352 and 355 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged his involvement, while the petitioner …
Ghanshyam Singh, a recovery officer with Bihar Gramin Bank, applied for bail fearing arrest in a 2016 complaint (No.1231C) alleging offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 474 and 120B. The complaint was lodged by the brother of one accused against his own brother, the banker, and other …
The petitioners, residents of Ghasipakad, were named in FIR No. 328 of 2025 for alleged assault causing simple injury under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. They filed an application for anticipatory bail, claiming they were falsely implicated and that the victim’s injury was minor. …
The petitioners, Bigna Devi and Juli Kumari, filed an anticipatory bail application in connection with a criminal case (Chenari P.S. Case No. 118 of 2024) involving alleged offences under Sections 498(A), 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner's counsel withdrew the application on …
Shubham Kumar, a resident of Bhojpur, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act. The allegations involve assault on a minor and inappropriate touching. The …
The petitioners, Ravi Thakur and Jitendra Thakur, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Akbarnagar P.S. Case No. 127 of 2024) involving alleged assault causing simple injury under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged they participated in the assault, …
The petitioner, Naveen Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal case (PS No. 290 of 2025) that alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the Arms Act, the SC/ST Act and the POCSO Act, including extortion (rangdari). The prosecution opposed the bail, arguing the …
The petitioner, Himanshu Kumar (alias Chandan), was accused in a dowry harassment case (Complaint No. 277 of 2024) under IPC sections 498A and 34 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and false implication. The State opposed the bail. Relying on the …
The petitioner, Tarkeshwar Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a 2003 case (PS No. 88) involving offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 353, 379 and Arms Act section 27. He claimed innocence, asserted that he was an absconder only due to work commitments in Pune and Delhi, and had a …
Arsad Ansari applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (No. 234 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 74, 75, 3(5) of the BNS and Sections 4 and 8 of the POCSO Act, involving the alleged molestation of a 14‑year‑old girl. The prosecution presented the serious nature of the …
The petitioner, Mantu Kumar Modi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Purnea Mahila P.S. Case No. 22 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the B.N.S. for making false promises of marriage and having a physical relationship with the complainant. The prosecution alleged …
Satendra Turha applied to the Patna High Court seeking regular bail after his name appeared in the driver’s self‑inculpatory statement in a case involving the seizure of 470.083 kg of ganja. The prosecution alleged that the seized narcotics were linked to the petitioner under Sections 20(b)(ii)(c), …
The petitioner, Vishwadev Anand, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal case (Pandaul P.S. Case No. 108 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and others stabbed the victim, but the petitioner claimed innocence and …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the POCSO Act for allegedly establishing a physical relationship with an informant under the pretext of marriage. The prosecution alleged that …
The petitioners, Sourav Pandey and Bhola Pandey, sought relief fearing arrest in a case (Ropou P.S. Case No. 147 of 2025) involving multiple offences under the BNS. The first petitioner was arrested during the pendency of the application, and his counsel requested withdrawal of the application on …
Mithun Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for alleged assault causing simple injury. The prosecution alleged his involvement, while the petitioner maintained his innocence. The State and the informant …
The petitioners, Urmila Devi, an 80‑year‑old woman, and Ragni Devi, the sister‑in‑law of the deceased, feared arrest in a murder case (Case No. 76 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 103(1), 238, 85 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. They contended that they were falsely …
The petitioners, four members of the Yadav family from Shahjahnapur, sought bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (Bikram P.S. Case No. 319 of 2025) filed under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita alleging assault. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners assaulted the victim, while …
The petitioner, Sunita Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (Baheri P.S. Case No. 354 of 2025) involving multiple offences under the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and the Dowry Prohibition Act. She is alleged to be the mother‑in‑law of the victim and accused of torturing …
Vikash Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related case (Baheri P.S. Case No. 354 of 2025) involving multiple offences under the B.N.S. and the Dowry Prohibition Act. He asserted that he and his wife, Richa Kumari, are government‑school teachers and that the allegations of …
The petitioner, Raju Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Muffasil P.S. Case No. 335 of 2025) involving multiple offences under the BNSS, including assault causing abrasion to the victim's lip. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner assaulted the victim, while the …
The petitioners, Shahdeo Chauhan and his wife Saroj Devi, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Hisua P.S. Case No. 315 of 2025) where their son Rankit Chauhan is accused of kidnapping. The prosecution alleged offences under Sections 96 and 140(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, …
The petitioner, Prabhat Kumar (also known as Prabhat Pathak), sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related case (Sitamarhi Mahila P.S. Case No. 34 of 2024) filed under IPC sections 498A, 341, 323, 504, 406, 506/34. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and others assaulted the …
The petitioners, members of the Yadav family, feared arrest in a case (Amarpur PS Case No. 32 of 2025) involving alleged assault, caste-based abuse, and offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. They contended they were innocent and merely relatives of the main …
The petitioners, Priti Kumar, Vijay Mahto and Sanjay Mahto, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a murder case (PS Case No. 262 of 2025) where they were alleged to have been involved in the killing of Rishi Kumar, who had eloped with their daughter. The prosecution alleged offences under …
The Patna High Court considered an application for anticipatory bail filed by Anil Kumar in connection with a case registered under sections 310(2), 317(3), 61(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. The prosecution alleged that three unknown persons looted an informant and that the …
The petitioner, Umesh Ray, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Bhelahi PS Case No. 48 of 2025) involving multiple offences under the Bihar Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that a mob of about 50‑55 persons, including the petitioner, assaulted police while they were attempting …
The petitioner, Ramesh Rai, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Bhelahi PS Case No.48 of 2025) involving alleged participation in a mob that assaulted police while they were trying to arrest another accused. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was among 50‑55 persons who …
Dipak Kumar sought relief from imminent arrest in a case registered under Sections 137(2) and 140(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita alleging abduction of a girl. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner abducted the victim, but the victim’s statement indicated that she had voluntarily eloped with …
The petitioners, Asha Devi and Mira Devi, sought relief from arrest in a criminal case (Rampur Hari P.S. Case No. 144 of 2025) filed under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. Counsel for Mira Devi withdrew her application, and the court dismissed it, directing her to surrender …
The petitioner, Sanjiv Mehta, sought anticipatory bail after a vehicle registered in his name was seized containing 48 litres of cough syrup with codeine, alleged to be in violation of Section 21(C) of the NDPS Act. He contended that he had sold the vehicle to Roshan Roy on 12 September 2024, …
Petitioner Bablu Mukhiya sought bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No.105/2024) involving offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 506/34 and Arms Act section 27. He asserted that the matter had been amicably settled with the accused, who are close relatives, and a compromise petition had been …
Petitioner Raj Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court. The Court, on 18 July 2024, directed the petitioner to file the requisite documents and serve notice to the second opposite party, the police inspector, within one week. The petitioner failed to appear and …
The petitioner, Binayak Bhalchandra, filed an application seeking to quash the order dated 17 September 2018 that had taken cognizance of alleged offences under Sections 292 and 354(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 66(E) and 67(A) of the Information Technology Act. The High Court examined …
The petitioners sought to quash a cognizance order dated 28‑08‑2018 and a subsequent revision order because the case against them was instituted more than seven years after the alleged incident. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, armed with a rifle, assaulted a pregnant woman, causing a …
The petitioner, Amant Sharma, was charged under IPC Sections 188 and 353 and Section 10 of the Bihar Conduct Examination Act for allegedly disrupting an examination centre. He contended that he was merely dropping off his ill niece, had no criminal intent, and that the case was fabricated. The State …
The matter is Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.355 of 2022 arising from PS case No.161 of 2019, filed by Jai Prakash Paswan against the State of Bihar and Shakuntala Devi. The appellant sought to challenge the conviction recorded in the lower court. The appeal was listed before Hon’ble Justice Sandeep Kumar …
The appellant Karu Kumar appealed against his conviction for rape, wrongful restraint and causing hurt under IPC sections 376, 341 and 323, and for offences under section 3(i)(xi) of the SC/ST Act. He sought bail under Section 389(1) of the CrPC and suspension of his sentence, arguing that the …
The petitioners, two women from Madhubani district, were charged under IPC sections 341, 323 and 504/34 in a case registered in 2013. They filed an application seeking to quash the order dated 06.01.2022 that framed charges against them, arguing that the proper remedy was a discharge application …
The petitioner, Rupendra Kumar, filed an application seeking to quash the order dated 08‑06‑2018 of the Sessions Judge, Khagaria, which rejected his request for the release of a seized rifle, live cartridges, a mobile phone and cash. The seizure arose from a pending criminal case (Alauli P.S. Case …
Chanda Devi filed an application seeking to quash two orders that had declared possession under Section 145 of the Criminal Procedure Code – one dated 24 July 2019 by the Sessions Judge and another dated 25 April 2017 by the SDM. The petitioner contended that the proceedings under Sections 144 and …
The petitioners filed an application to quash the order of cognizance dated 06.01.2021, which had taken cognizance of offences under several IPC sections and the Dowry Prohibition Act against them. They contended that there were no specific allegations against petitioners 1‑3 and that the dowry …
The appellant, Geeta Devi, appealed against an order dated 28‑09‑2021 of the Special Judge (SC/ST (POA) Act) that had taken cognizance of an alleged assault under IPC Section 323 and Sections 3(i), (r), (s) of the SC/ST (POA) Act. The prosecution alleged that the appellant and others assaulted the …
Petitioners Parmeshwar Sharma and Sohan Sharma filed an application seeking quash of an order dated 21‑11‑2019 that had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 341, 323, 354, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioners, through counsel, later decided to withdraw the application, seeking …
The petitioner, Ranjit Kumar Shukla, filed an application seeking to quash the order dated 01.07.2021 of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali, which had taken cognizance of an alleged offence under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code. The petition argued that the cognizance was improper. During …
Brijendra Choudhary filed an application seeking to quash an order dated 06‑10‑2020 in which a Special Judge had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 302, 201, 376, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the POCSO Act, despite a contrary police report. The petitioner argued that …
In a criminal miscellaneous proceeding (No.44488 of 2021) arising from a 2017 complaint in Gopalganj, the petitioner, Lal Babu Sharma, filed an application before the Patna High Court. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Bipin Kumar, sought to withdraw the application. The court, after hearing on 3 …
The petitioner, Santosh Kumar Suman, a cabinet minister of Bihar, filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking relief from the operation of an order dated 12‑02‑2021 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in PS Case No. 199 of 2017. The petitioner contended that the order and …
The petitioners filed an application seeking to quash an order dated 06.03.2021 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge in a revision proceeding concerning a land dispute arising from Warisnagar P.S. Case No. 282 of 2018. Both parties claim ownership of the land from which wood was cut; …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar, was arrested after police seized a motorcycle containing one litre of illicit liquor. He contended that he had sold the motorcycle to Anil Harijan before the incident and that the transfer of ownership was pending due to technical issues. The petitioner argued that the …
The petitioner, Tarkeshwar Tiwari, filed an application in a criminal miscellaneous case and later sought to withdraw it, requesting liberty to raise all grounds at a later stage. The court allowed the withdrawal of the application, directing that any future application be considered by the lower …
The appellant Raj Narayan Singh was implicated in a case arising from an old land dispute with the informant Ram Janam Ram. The FIR alleged offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 504, 506 and under Section 3(1)(V) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The appellant contended that the dispute …
The petitioners, members of the Mishra family, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quash of FIR No. 173 of 2019 registered at Bhairav Asthan PS, which alleged offences under several IPC sections and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petition argued that the investigation was pending …
Ravi Bhushan Ojha appealed to set aside a part of the judgment dated 08.04.2021 in which the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Buxar, allowed the appeal of respondents 2 and 3 and set aside their conviction and sentence under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that …
The petitioner, Idris Ansari, filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking relief. While the proceedings were pending, the charges against him were framed by the trial court. The petitioner’s counsel subsequently moved to withdraw the application, arguing that it had become infructuous. …
Manoj Kumar filed an application seeking to quash the order dated 08‑09‑2014 by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Katihar, which had taken cognizance of an alleged offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioner argued that the order should be set aside. During hearing, …
The appellants, four Yadav brothers, were charged under IPC sections 304, 201, 308, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly killing an informant's husband at a marriage ceremony. They filed an application seeking to set aside the …
Petitioner Waquar Raza challenged the illegal seizure of his vehicle by Bihar authorities, seeking a writ of certiorari, mandamus for release, and an independent inquiry. The High Court examined the order dated 06.01.2026 that rejected his show‑cause reply without recording any reasons. Relying on …
The appellant, a child in conflict with law, was accused of abducting an informant's daughter and having a physical relationship with her. The appellant argued that he was a juvenile, being under eighteen at the time of the alleged offence, and invoked the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of …
The appellant, Saurabh Yadav, was alleged to have been hired to murder the deceased. He was a juvenile at the time of the alleged offence, being under eighteen years of age. The appellant sought bail, invoking Sections 3(i), (iv), (v), (xiv) and Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and …
Govind Thakurai filed a civil writ petition (Case No.428 of 2026) in the Patna High Court challenging actions of various officials of the State of Bihar. The petition was filed against the State of Bihar and several departmental officers. During the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel sought the …
Ashok Kumar Thakur filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking to quash an order dated 25.05.2015 issued by the Sub‑Divisional Officer under Section 144 of the Criminal Procedure Code, and the subsequent confirming order dated 09.04.2019 by the Additional Sessions Judge. The petitioner …
Munni Devi, the petitioner, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Principal Chief Conservator of Forest‑cum‑Chairman of the State Level Committee for Wood‑Based Industries, Bihar, to dispose of her representation dated 15‑12‑2025. She wants her saw‑mill included in the Final …
The petitioners sought to quash an order dated 25-02-2019 of the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Bihar Sharif, which had taken cognizance of offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 504, 337 and 379 arising from a land‑dispute incident on 10‑11 February 2018. The magistrate, after reviewing the …
The appellant Sanjeev Kumar filed a criminal appeal (SJ) No.793 of 2019 seeking to set aside the order dated 29‑11‑2018 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, IV‑cum‑Special Judge, SC/ST Patna, in Special Case No. 466 of 2017. The appellant claimed that the dispute had been settled …
The petitioners, a group of twelve individuals from Charuanwan village, were acquitted in a criminal case (PS Case No.57 Year‑2018). After the acquittal, they filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking permission to withdraw it. The petitioners argued that, having been cleared of all …
The petitioners Ajeet Kumar and Indrajeet Kumar sought to quash a summons order dated 17-12-2019 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 341, 323, 504 and 34 IPC despite the charge‑sheet indicating that they were not involved. The …
The petitioner, Avinash Kumar, filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking to set aside an order dated 20 January 2016 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Nawada, which had taken cognizance under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. The application was filed in 2019, more …
The appellant, a school principal, was summoned by a Special Judicial Magistrate in a SC/ST case despite a police investigation that exonerated him. The prosecution alleged that the principal’s son was assaulted and that the principal’s school staff participated in the assault and theft of a gold …
Shiva Mourya filed an application in the Patna High Court seeking to withdraw the present application and raise all grounds at a later stage. The petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw, citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Kanchan Kumar v. State of Bihar. The court considered …
The appellants Manoj, Harishchandra and Sunil Thakur were charged under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC sections for allegedly threatening a complainant over a land dispute involving a temple for Scheduled Castes and Tribes. The trial court took cognizance of the offences …
The appellants Raj Kumar Mahto, Om Prakash Mahto and Ravindra Mishra were charged in a 2018 complaint case for the death of Mahadeo Mahto, a Scheduled Caste wage‑labourer, alleging they killed him by a tractor over a wage dispute. The Sessions Judge took cognizance under IPC sections 341, 323, 406 …
The petitioners filed an application seeking to raise all grounds at a later stage in the criminal miscellaneous proceedings. The petitioners subsequently sought to withdraw this application. The court, after hearing counsel, allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the application as withdrawn, …
