Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
5892 judgments · newest first · showing 3601–3800
The petitioners, Birendra and Vijay Mandal, were charged in a 2014 case for offences including murder, robbery, and illegal possession of arms. They had previously obtained anticipatory bail, which was later withdrawn on the condition that they surrender and apply for regular bail. Instead of …
The petitioner, Pawan Singh, filed a modification application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding before the Patna High Court. The petitioner, through counsel, later sought the Court's permission to withdraw that application. The State of Bihar, represented by an Assistant Public Prosecutor, …
The appellant Mritunjay Thakur filed Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.118 of 2026 before the Patna High Court arising from a 2017 case. The appellant, represented by Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Singh and Ms. Divya Bharti, sought permission to withdraw the appeal. The State of Bihar, represented by Special Public …
The petitioner, Nabal Sha, sought anticipatory bail after learning of a pending case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of ten litres of liquor from a straw house on his premises. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in his conscious …
The appellant, Sintu Kumar, filed a criminal appeal challenging the State of Bihar and Rita Devi. During the proceedings, the appellant sought to withdraw his second anticipatory bail application. The learned counsel for the appellant requested permission from the court to withdraw the application. …
The petitioner, Suneeta Devi, sought bail in a criminal case registered under Sections 406, 409 and 420 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging cheating and criminal breach of trust of public money. She claimed to have a clean antecedent, asserted that she was falsely implicated by the …
The petitioner, Merolal Sahani, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking modification of the time of surrender granted in an anticipatory bail order. The petitioner had not surrendered within the period specified in the original bail order. The State opposed the modification. The Court …
The petitioners, Mukesh Sahni and Ajay Kumar, applied for bail in a criminal case (PS Case No‑219/2025) alleging violation of Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from an orchard not owned by them. The …
The petitioner, Sugreev Singh, was implicated in a case concerning the alleged recovery of 724.28 litres of liquor from a seized vehicle, charged under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean criminal …
Bhola Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous petition against the State of Bihar arising from a police case. No counsel appeared for the petitioner, while the State was represented by Advocate Shyameshwar Dayal. The Hon'ble Justice Satyavrat Verma observed that there was no prosecution instituted …
Appu Patel and Amar Patel, the petitioners, had been granted anticipatory bail with a stipulated time to surrender. They filed a modification application seeking an extension of the surrender deadline. The State of Bihar opposed the extension. Justice Satyavrat Verma held that the court should not …
The petitioner, Ramesh Yadav, was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 67.5 litres of liquor from a public place. He has five prior cases, four of which are also under the Excise Act, and has been in custody since 9‑January‑2026. The petitioner argued that he …
The petitioner, Ranjeet Sah, applied for bail in a criminal case registered under Sections 413 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 442.8 litres of liquor from a tractor and a motorcycle. He contended that …
Anil Bind (also known as Anil Choudhary), a resident of Hariharpur in Bhojpur district, filed a restoration application seeking to have Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2370 of 2026 reinstated to its original file. The petitioner was represented by Advocate Shankar Kumar, while the State of Bihar was …
The petitioner, Ashok Kumar Sinha, a senior citizen with a clean record, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in an FIR alleging offences under Sections 406, 420, 506 and 34 of the IPC. The FIR primarily targets his nephew, Mukesh Kumar Sinha, for allegedly cheating an informant by …
Petitioner Pallu Kumar was granted anticipatory bail with a stipulated surrender date. He failed to surrender within the prescribed time and subsequently filed an application seeking modification of the bail order to extend the surrender period. The Court examined whether it could extend the …
The petitioner, Aditya Kumar Singh, was implicated in a fraud case involving alleged unauthorized withdrawals from several bank accounts, with charges under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Prevention of Corruption Act. He contended that he opened the accounts on the direction of …
The petitioners, four residents of Uchidih village, filed a contempt application before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and its officials, alleging non‑compliance with an order of the Writ Court. The petitioners later informed the Court that the order had been complied with and …
The petitioner, Saista Perween, challenged the termination of her husband's services by the District Programme Officer, Literacy, Muzaffarpur, issued on 04-12-2025. The State argued that the earlier order dated 16-01-2025 in CWJC No.8272 of 2018 had been complied with, and that the petitioner could …
Jayant Kumar Jha, a ward secretary, was implicated in a case under Sections 409, 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly withdrawing Rs. 17 lakh meant for the Jal Nal Yojna, which was not completed. Jha, who has a clean antecedent, applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that he was falsely …
The petitioner, Neeraj Gandhi, was implicated in an FIR under Section 304 IPC for a fire that broke out at Pal Hotel, resulting in six deaths. He contended that he was not present at the scene, that the fire was caused by the chef’s negligence, and that the FIR exaggerated the allegations. The …
The petitioner, owner of a hotel adjacent to Pal Hotel, sought anticipatory bail after a fire at Pal Hotel resulted in six deaths and alleged negligence under Section 304 IPC. He argued that the fire originated in Pal Hotel due to the chef’s negligence and that his own hotel was not the site of the …
Amrita Kumari filed a civil writ petition (CWJC No.19722 of 2024) against the State of Bihar and several education officials. The petitioner sought restoration of the writ after it had been dismissed or withdrawn. The High Court, after hearing counsel, considered the grounds presented in the …
The petitioner, Nikhil Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged sexual assault and other offences against a minor, charged under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and the POCSO Act. He contended that he has a clean record and was falsely implicated, …
The petitioner, Raghuraj Tiwari, owner of the Mausami Orchestra, was arrested in connection with alleged offences under the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, the POCSO Act and the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, 1956, on the claim that two minor girls were found in his orchestra. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Saket Sameer, sought anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 379, 504, 498A and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. He claimed false implication, cooperation with police under Section 41(A) CrPC, and expressed willingness to pay a …
The petitioners, including Amna Khatoon and others, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous case. They later approached the court seeking permission to withdraw that application. The learned counsel for the petitioners requested the court’s …
Surya Narayan Mistri filed a petition seeking modification of an order in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding. The petitioner later requested permission to withdraw the modification application. The court considered the petitioner's request and the arguments of the State and the respondent, Bihar …
Petitioners Kanhaiya Lal Santhalia and Saurav Santhalia filed a contempt application against the State of Bihar and several officials, alleging non‑compliance with an order dated 13 May 2025 in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7759 of 2025. The petitioners later informed the court that the order had …
The petitioner, Pankaj Tirky, was charged with offences under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly misappropriating compensation meant for land acquisition victims Kishore Kumar and Sunaina Devi. The petitioner claimed a clean antecedent and asserted that he …
The petitioner, Rohit Paswan, was named in an FIR for offences under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes (B.N.S., 2023) following an alleged assault on an informant. He contended that he has a clean record, was falsely implicated, and that the alleged assault was minor and not under …
Petitioner Parwati Devi applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., arising from a land dispute where the informant alleged looting of wheat crops. The petitioner argued that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that …
Petitioner Md. Sabir filed a contempt application against the State of Bihar and several officials, alleging non‑compliance with an earlier order dated 3‑July‑2025 in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1116 of 2025. The petitioner later claimed that the order had been complied with and sought the …
Sambhu Mehta was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 103(1), 61(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act, based on a FIR against unknown persons and a confessional statement of co‑accused Shiyaram Mehta. The petitioner, who has twelve prior cases, has been in custody since …
The Patna High Court considered the bail application of Lalu Paswan, who was arrested in connection with offences under IPC sections 448, 504, 323, 324, 307, 506 and 34 arising from a land‑related dispute with the informant. The petitioner claimed a clean antecedent, asserted that only one grievous …
The petitioners, including Sajan Prasad Singh and his sons, filed a restoration application seeking to have Criminal Miscellaneous No. 56076 of 2025 restored to its original file. The State of Bihar opposed the application. The High Court heard arguments from counsel for both sides on 6 February …
The petitioner, S.K. Ekbal, was charged under multiple sections of the B.N.S. for alleged stabbing offences that resulted in the death of the informant's son. He claimed that he was at Gaunaha Police Station on the date of the incident, resolving a land dispute, and therefore could not have …
The petitioner, Arun Kumar Tiwari, was implicated in a FIR alleging offences under the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and the Arms Act, stemming from a shooting incident in which his brother Santosh allegedly fired at the informant's son. The petitioner contended that he had a clean record and was …
The petitioner, Rajiv Prasad Verma, applied for bail anticipating arrest in a case involving offences under several sections of the B.N.S. and Section 37 of the Excise Act. The investigating officers testified that the alleged knife injury was actually caused by a blunt object, reducing the …
Sudish Sahani was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 245 litres of spirit from an open field and charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was not caught in possession, the alleged recovery was from land not belonging to him, and that the case was …
The petitioner, Subhash Kumar, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor from a truck and a banana orchard. He contended that he was not caught …
Petitioner Gita Sinha filed a contempt application against the State of Bihar and several officials, alleging non‑compliance with an order dated 21.01.2025 in CWJC No. 17331 of 2024. The Collector, Nawada, later complied with the order, albeit belatedly. The petitioner sought permission to withdraw …
Petitioner Binod Kumar Singh filed a contempt application challenging the compliance of an earlier order dated 24-10-2024 in CWJC No.16026/2024. The State argued that the Circle Officer had complied by issuing an order on 16-06-2025, as shown in the annexure. The petitioner then sought the court's …
Arun Kumar Singh filed a contempt application before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and several officials, alleging that his grievance had not been addressed. The petitioner later informed the court that his grievance had been redressed and sought permission to withdraw the contempt …
The Patna High Court heard an application for anticipatory bail filed by petitioner No.3, a 61‑year‑old senior citizen with a clean record, who was alleged to have participated in an assault related to a land dispute. The petitioner argued that the injury report was inconsistent and possibly …
The petitioner, Dhananjay Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S., 2023, alleging that he was falsely implicated in the assault and murder of the informant's father. The FIR alleges that the petitioner, along with others, entered the informant's house, …
Anil Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court in a criminal case (PS Case No. 425 of 2024). During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel expressed difficulty in continuing the proceedings and sought the court's permission to withdraw the application. The court …
The petitioner, Dheeraj Kumar Paswan, was arrested in connection with an alleged kidnapping of a girl purportedly aged 13, under Sections 137(2), 96 and 61 of the B.N.S. The petitioner contended that the victim was actually 17‑19 years old, as determined by a medical board and the magistrate, and …
Rahul Kumar was arrested in connection with a case filed under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, alleging that he assaulted a neighbour with a knife. The petitioner contended that the informant, who is also his neighbour, had a property dispute with him and later recanted his …
The petitioner, Vinit Singh, was implicated in an FIR alleging offences under Sections 376 and 313 of the Indian Penal Code, stemming from a relationship that began in 2015 and allegedly involved a false promise of marriage. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting a clean record, his age of …
Mantosh Kumar, the owner of a vehicle from which 3520 liters of codeine were allegedly recovered, applied for anticipatory bail before the Patna High Court. His first anticipatory bail application (Criminal Miscellaneous No. 29554 of 2024) was withdrawn on 22 August 2024. He subsequently filed a …
The petitioner, Perwez Khan, feared arrest in a case involving numerous IPC offences and a provision of the Bihar Control of Use and Play of Loudspeaker Act, arising from a disturbance during a Durga immersion procession near a mosque. He asserted a clean antecedent and claimed false implication by …
Shiv Kumar Kewat, a driver‑cum‑owner of a vehicle allegedly used in the kidnapping of a woman, was arrested on 27‑08‑2025 and charged under Sections 140(1), 140(3) and 3(5) of the BNS. He applied for regular bail, contending he has a clean record and that the victim’s husband and a co‑accused had …
The petitioner, Md. Bashir Ahmad, filed a restoration application concerning Criminal Miscellaneous No. 77601 of 2023 arising from a police case in Bhabua, Kaimur. The State of Bihar and South Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd were opposite parties. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Prabhakar Singh, …
The petitioners, three Yadav brothers, filed an anticipatory bail application in a case registered under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Petitioners No.2 and No.3 withdrew their applications, which the court allowed. Petitioner No.1, claiming …
Petitioner Rajendra Tiwari, a 69‑year‑old man with a clean record, was implicated in an FIR (PS‑212/2025) alleging offences under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 25(1‑b)(a), 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act, stemming from the alleged killing of an informant's …
Petitioner Karu Choudhary sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that the liquor recovered from his under‑construction house was planted and that the case diary had not been produced. The …
The petitioners, three residents of Ishapur, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 2,200 litres of liquor from vehicles. They argued they had clean criminal records, were not in possession of the liquor, …
Rohit Singh filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case arising from PS Dighwara, Saran. He later sought permission to withdraw that application and instead surrender to obtain regular bail. The court, after hearing counsel for both parties and the investigating officers, granted the …
Aradhana Giri filed a contempt application against her husband, Anuj Pal Goswami, alleging violation of an order dated 08‑04‑2024 in Criminal Miscellaneous No.17926 of 2024. While the contempt proceeding was pending, the parties obtained a mutual‑consent divorce and the husband withdrew all pending …
The petitioner, Bhuplal Yadav, was arrested in connection with a 2020 incident alleged to involve rioting, assault, and murder under IPC Sections 147, 148, 149, 324 and 302. He applied for regular bail, claiming he was falsely implicated and that the FIR contains only vague, omnibus allegations. The …
The petitioner, Md. Tanveer Alam, applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging his participation in a violent assault on his family, with charges under multiple sections of the B.N.S. He claimed a clean criminal record and asserted that the allegations were false and motivated by a …
The appellant, Babulal Mahto, filed an appeal against his conviction but failed to file it within the statutory 90‑day period. He sought condonation of the delay, pleading that he was unaware of the specific legal provision governing the limitation. The Special Public Prosecutor argued that …
The petitioners, Dashai Ram and Sita Devi, father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law of a woman who died under suspicious circumstances, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case registered under Sections 80 and 61(2) of the B.N.S. The FIR alleged that the deceased was tortured for a …
The petitioner, Saurabh Kumar Singh, applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case registered under Sections 317(5), 318(4) and 340(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued that …
The petitioner, Anil Sahu, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, for allegedly transporting 30 litres of liquor in his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in …
Petitioner Priyaranjan Choudhary applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 0.75 litres of liquor from a cowshed belonging to Subodh Choudhary. The petitioner …
Manish Kumar, a resident of Khokasaha in Samastipur, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 10.8 litres of liquor from a straw house not belonging to him. He asserted a clean criminal record and argued that the …
The petitioner, Sanjay Ram, feared arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 36 litres of liquor from an auto he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, and was unaware that …
The petitioner, Bhola Sah, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly possessing 25.92 litres of liquor in a dalan, though no arrest was made at the spot and the liquor was not in his immediate possession. He has eight prior …
Petitioner Karu Chauhan sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a) to 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of liquor and fermented Mahua from land adjacent to his borewell, which he claims does not belong to him. He contended that …
The petitioner, Amar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged illegal possession of 720 litres of liquor and seizure of a Bolero vehicle and a motorcycle under Sections 338, 336(3) and 318(4) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Sections 30(a) and …
The petitioner, Sushil Pathak, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging recovery of 1.920 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house and not in his possession. He argued that the investigation was based …
The petitioners, three residents of Tehti Bin Toli, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor. They argued they have no prior criminal record, the liquor was recovered from a public place not belonging to …
The petitioner, Om Prakash Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 126 litres of liquor from a maize field not owned by him. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in …
Ramvinay Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 427.140 litres of liquor from a vehicle he did not own. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, the seized …
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 175 litres of liquor from a public place. He argued that he was not in possession of the …
The petitioner, Chandan Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 45 litres of liquor from a bush not in his possession. He argued that the police implicated him mechanically based on …
Kabita Devi was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 20 litres of liquor recovered from a bathan near her house. She filed an anticipatory bail application, arguing that the liquor was stored by a hostile neighbour …
The petitioner, Bablu Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 900 litres of liquor. He has five prior cases under the Excise Act but was not arrested at the spot and …
Petitioner Pradeep Kumar applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging that 8.145 litres of liquor were recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious …
The petitioner, Rajesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, relating to alleged recovery of liquor from an agricultural field. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession and that the alleged …
Ramadhar Das, owner of a vehicle seized in a case involving 600 ml of liquor allegedly possessed by his son Raj Kumar Das, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 30(a), 37(b) and 37(c) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner argued he had a clean antecedent and was unaware of …
Manoj Yadav applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 936 litres of liquor from an old, jointly‑owned house. The petitioner argued that he was not in actual possession, the house was …
Lakshman Kumar, the owner of a motorcycle from which 15 litres of liquor were recovered, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with offences under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Excise Act. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not …
Santosh Yadav, a resident of Ballia, Uttar Pradesh, feared arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 1,486.56 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of …
The petitioner, Biranjan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 51.120 litres of liquor from a scooty he owned. The petitioner's counsel admitted a mistake in the …
Petitioners Chotan Yadav and Dharmendra Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that the recovery of 200 litres of liquor was based solely on a confessional statement made by Santosh Kumar while in …
Mukesh Sahani applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor from a field not belonging to him. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession and that the case was based on a …
Petitioner Rahul Kumar, who has six prior excise cases, applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act alleging recovery of 656.61 litres of liquor from a bush not in his possession. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot and that the …
The petitioner, Harishankar Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of …
Manju Devi applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging recovery of 10 litres of liquor and 50 litres of Mahua from her residence, alleged offences under Sections 274 and 275 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act. She …
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after a vehicle he owned was seized containing 398.52 litres of liquor, alleged to be a violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had no knowledge of the misuse of his vehicle and that no liquor was found in his …
Vikash Ram sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 108 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a motorcycle. He argued he was not caught in possession, was not the vehicle's owner, and was implicated by a local informant without …
The petitioner, Rajesh Sada, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 107.37 litres of liquor from an auto. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the vehicle at the time of the incident, and that the vehicle had …
Lita Soran, a woman with a clean antecedent, feared arrest in a case alleging recovery of 36 litres of liquor from her joint family house under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. She argued that the liquor was not in her conscious possession, that the 2018 amendment abolished the …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in an excise case involving the alleged recovery of 100.800 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, that the driver acted without his knowledge, …
The petitioner, Gajendra Raut, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging recovery of 5 litres of liquor from a bush adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the location did not …
Manoj Kumar (Manoj Choudhary) applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 15 litres of liquor at his poultry farm. He contended that the liquor was planted by an adversary, that he was not in actual possession, and that …
The petitioner, Abhay Kumar, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act for allegedly having 750 ml of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor, was not in possession at the time of seizure, …
Vicky Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 79 litres of liquor from a brick‑kiln. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, the liquor was not in …
The petitioner, Vikash Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 3,335.4 litres of liquor from a truck. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not …
The petitioner, Kedar Ravidas, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 17.25 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested …
Mithlesh Chaudhari applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 alleging that 67 litres of liquor were recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. The petitioner argued that …
The petitioner, Mukhtar Dhangad, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from his residence. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and that …
The petitioner, Sudin Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 20 litres of liquor and 200 litres of jawa mahua from a banana orchard adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious …
The petitioners sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that 140 litres of liquor was recovered from a bag near a river and not from their possession. They …
The petitioner, Vicky Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 15.375 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the seized liquor was not in his possession, and the …
The petitioner, Manoj Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 6.375 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time …
Petitioner Birju Yadav sought anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 14.625 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious …
Jagdev Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(I)(II) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 2,205 litres of liquor from a DCM truck. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious possession …
The petitioner, Pujan Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 200 litres of spirit were allegedly recovered from a bush not belonging to him. He argued that the recovery was not from his conscious …
The petitioner, Rohit Kumar Singh, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 23 litres of liquor recovered from a garden that does not belong to him. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on a confessional statement made by another accused, …
The petitioners, Jainath Kumar and Shyam Babu Ray, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022. They contended that they were not arrested on the spot, …
The petitioner, Sukhari Sahni, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018, involving the alleged recovery of 149.76 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, did not own the vehicle, …
The petitioner, Sumit Bharti, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 80 litres of liquor from a public place. He contended that no liquor was found in his possession and that the case was …
The petitioner, Dhanji Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018, alleging that 14 litres of liquor were recovered from his joint family house. He argued that he had no conscious possession, the liquor could …
The petitioner, Md. Jahir, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging possession of 796.8 litres of liquor recovered from a Mahindra pick‑up, with charges under IPC sections 272 and 273 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 sections 30(a), 36 and 41. He contended he had a …
Mukesh Manjhi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from a place adjacent to his house. The petitioner claimed he was not in possession of …
Petitioners Bachchalal Kumar and Chhotu Kumar applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 48 litres of liquor from a paddy field near a school. They argued that they …
The petitioner, Om Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 30.39 litres of liquor from his joint family house. The petitioner argued that he had no prior arrest, no …
The petitioner, Sultana Parween, sought anticipatory bail after learning that she might be arrested in a case registered under Sections 272 and 273 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of nine litres of liquor from a scooty she …
The petitioner, Gulshan Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 60 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a sack near a canal, not in his possession. He argued that the recovery was …
The petitioners, three brothers named Lalu, Raman and Rahul Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 19.275 litres of liquor from a location not belonging to them. They contended that the liquor was …
The petitioner, Kanhaiya Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 3.87 litres of liquor from a forest area near a railway station. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor …
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar Ray, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for alleged recovery of 43.2 litres of liquor from a scooty he owned. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, the liquor was not found in his possession, …
Shiv Shankar Rajwanshi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Sections 30(A) and 30(c) of the Excise Act, involving recovery of liquor and jawa mahua. The petitioner claimed he was not arrested on the spot, had no …
The petitioner, Naresh Rai, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for the alleged recovery of 59.7 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, …
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar Dom, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not present at …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar Jha, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 1.5 litres of liquor in his vehicle. He argued that the liquor was hidden by his driver, that he was unaware of the misuse, and that nothing was recovered from his conscious …
The petitioner, Ranjan Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 7.5 litres of liquor from an abandoned bag, which he claimed was not in his conscious possession. He argued that the investigation relied solely on secret information without proper …
Vishal Sah was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 27 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, charged under Sections 30(a), 32(1)(3) and 41(i)(ii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the …
The petitioner, Santosh Kumar, was implicated in a case involving the seizure of 81 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, alleged under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he was not present at the spot, had no conscious …
Petitioner Pawan Safi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with offences under Sections 30(a), 31(1) and 31(2) of the Excise Act, alleging that he was not arrested at the scene and had no conscious possession of the seized liquor. The …
Pinki Devi applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging offences under Sections 30(a) and 37(c) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of nine litres of liquor from a bush behind her father‑in‑law's house. The petitioner argued she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that no liquor was …
The petitioner, Dhiraj Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 9.75 litres of liquor from sacks, which he claims were not in his possession and were located on property not belonging to him. He contended that the police had mechanically …
The petitioner, Laxman Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1)(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, relating to the alleged recovery of 559.8 litres of liquor from a truck and a motorcycle. He contended that he was not in …
Vijay Paswan filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, he surrendered to the authorities. The petitioner then sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The learned counsel for the State opposed the …
Mukhlal Prasad Gupta, the owner of a Hyva truck, was implicated in the recovery of 803.520 litres of liquor alleged to be in violation of Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting that he had a clean antecedent and that the …
Santosh Ram, a resident of East Champaran, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of 35 litres of liquor from a field not owned by him. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, no possession …
The petitioner, Suraj Kumar, owner of a Bolero vehicle, was implicated in the recovery of 358.2 litres of liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he was not present at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his driver misused the vehicle. …
Petitioner Rajendra Sahni sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly recovering 108 litres of liquor from a bush near a sugarcane field. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the …
The petitioner, Niraj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He alleged that the recovery of 22.5 litres of liquor and a seized motorcycle were linked to other accused, and that his implication rested solely on a confessional statement …
The petitioner, Jiwachh Kumar, the owner of a Hyundai car, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 84 litres of liquor from his vehicle. He argued that he was not present at the spot, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and he was …
The petitioner, Raghu Nandan Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of liquor from locations not in his immediate possession. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the …
The petitioner, Phulbabu Kumar, was implicated in a case (PS‑46/2025) for alleged possession of 186.06 litres of liquor recovered from four motorcycles and jute sacks, alleged to be a violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He contended that he had a …
Mukesh Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 25.875 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that …
The petitioner, Ranjan Nat, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing two litres of liquor and mahua jaggery solution recovered from his house, which was subsequently destroyed. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the …
Anuj Kumar, the owner of an E‑rickshaw from which 40.600 litres of liquor was seized, feared arrest under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, was not arrested at the spot, and was unaware that another person, …
Santosh Mehta and Hariom Mehta applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that liquor was recovered from motorcycles not owned by them and that they were implicated solely on the basis of a chowkidar's information. The …
The petitioner, Dhananjay Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of 12.21 litres of liquor from his joint family house. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested on the spot, that …
The petitioner, Rajnish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, where 2 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a motorcycle not owned by him. He argued he had a clean antecedent and that the seized liquor was …
Petitioner Pramod Singh applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 146.88 litres of liquor from his vehicle. He argued that he was not present at the spot, the liquor was not in his conscious …
The petitioner, Jitendra Rai, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 54 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no …
The petitioner, Md. Nasir, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 320 litres of liquor from an auto. He contended that he was merely a passenger who lost his mobile, which was later found in the seized vehicle, and that he had no …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly recovering 228.885 litres of liquor from a middle school premises. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in his …
The petitioner, Shankar Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging that the alleged seizure of liquor and a pistol was not from his possession and that the investigation was mechanically driven. He has four prior …
The appellants, Sanjay Singh and Santosh Singh, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and the BNS, 2023 for allegedly abusing and threatening an informant during a land dispute. The Special Judge had refused anticipatory bail, prompting the …
The appellants, Vishwanath Kumar Singh and others, appealed against the Special Judge's refusal to grant anticipatory bail under Section 14-A(2) of the SC/ST Act in a case involving alleged caste-based assault and other offences. They argued that the notice was properly served, the complainant …
The appellants, Brajesh Kumar Mandal and Kundan Kumar Mandal, filed Criminal Appeal No.1907 of 2025 against the State of Bihar and Mahendra Rajak. During the pendency of the appeal the appellants surrendered before the court. They then applied for permission to withdraw the appeal. The High Court, …
Manoj Bharti appealed against the refusal of anticipatory bail under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The FIR alleged that he, along with others, threatened an informant over a no‑confidence motion and later fired shots at the informant’s house, though no one was injured …
The appellant, Gope Khan, was charged under several IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged assault and caste-based abuse. He applied for anticipatory bail, which was denied by the District and Additional Sessions Judge. The appellant contended that the notice was …
The appellants, eight residents of Ustu village, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act, 2023 for alleged assault and caste-based abuse during a dispute over an obscene song. The …
The petitioners, Julfequar Ali, Arbaj Sai and Danish Sai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352, 74 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. They contended that they have clean antecedents and are falsely implicated by an …
The appellants, three sons of Surendra Prasad, were accused of assaulting the informant's grandmother during a land dispute, resulting in her death. The informant alleged that the appellants were cutting soil from his land and, when confronted, assaulted his grandmother. The appellants, who have …
Vijay Yadav sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR alleging offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, including assault and rioting. He asserted a clean record and claimed the informant, an agnate with whom he has a property dispute, falsely implicated him. …
The petitioner, Niraj Kumar, an 18‑year‑old with a clean record, was implicated in an assault case arising from a dispute over a passage, with the FIR alleging his participation in multiple assaults. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that the injuries were simple, he was falsely implicated, …
The petitioners, Rohit Baitha and Ram Kumar Rajak, were implicated in an FIR arising from a motor‑vehicle accident in which a passenger died. Rohit was alleged to be the driver of the auto, while Ram was a passenger who sustained injuries. Both filed anticipatory bail applications. Rohit's counsel …
Hiralal Kumar Yadav filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case. He later sought to withdraw that application and surrender to obtain regular bail. The High Court allowed the withdrawal, dismissing the anticipatory bail application as withdrawn. The Court directed that, upon surrender, …
Nirmala Devi and Prakash Ram applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 143, 61(2)(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., alleging involvement in the trafficking of minor girls. The prosecution’s case rests mainly on the confessional statement of a co‑accused, Sumit, who named the …
The petitioners—Abdul Rahman, Md Noorsid Alam and Khurshed Alam—filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case (PS‑Chhauradhano Case No. 282 of 2022) involving offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant alleged that the …
The petitioners, three residents of Kabirpur, Gaya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. They contended that they have clean antecedents and were falsely implicated by an …
The petitioners, Vinod Kumar Singh and Man Singh, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case alleging offences under several sections of the B.N.S., including assault, robbery and other violent crimes. They claimed to have clean antecedents and argued that the informant had falsely …
Petitioner Bacha Mahto filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case. The petitioner sought to withdraw the application, citing that the affidavit was sworn by his wife, who is also an accused. The petitioner requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail and to file a fresh …
The petitioner, Adhik Yadav, had filed an anticipatory bail application in the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner’s counsel then sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court considered whether a …
The petitioners, Anil Kumar and Kisun Dev Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., stemming from a land‑dispute‑related assault alleged to have occurred on 31 July 2025. They argued that they …
The petitioner, Gayama Yadav (also known as Ajay), sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109 and 352 of the Bihar Non‑Specific Act, 2023. The FIR alleges that his buffaloes grazed the informant’s field, leading the petitioner to assault …
The appellant, Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being charged under several sections of the B.N.S., the Arms Act and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged involvement in a shooting incident. The FIR alleged that a person named Rahul shot the …
The petitioner, Baban Manjhi, applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging that 26 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, had no knowledge of …
The petitioner, Ashok Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, relating to alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor near his village. He disclosed five prior criminal cases, four of which were under the Excise Act, …
The petitioner, Sita Devi, sought anticipatory bail after the police alleged that 37 litres of liquor were recovered from her residence, invoking Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. She contended that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that the liquor was located in a joint family house, …
Pawan Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under the Excise Act alleging offences under Sections 30(a), 41 and 56(b) for the alleged recovery of 20.940 litres of liquor from his Ertiga car. He argued that he had a clean …
Manish Yadav appealed against the refusal of anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 115(2), 69, 89, 352 and 351(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act and Sections 3(i)(w) and 3(ii)(v‑a) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The informant alleged …
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 129.870 litres of liquor from a cattle-shed. He argued that he was not in possession of …
Anu Kumari filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in connection with PS case No. 309 of 2024, which alleged offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The SHO appeared before the Patna High Court and admitted that, despite a final form favoring the petitioner, he …
The petitioner, Reena Devi, applied for anticipatory bail after a police case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 28 litres of liquor from her motorcycle. She argued that she had no prior criminal record, was a woman, and that the liquor was seized from …
Petitioner Rahul Kumar sought anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 612 litres of liquor from a public place near Budhanpur Chaur. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in …
The petitioners, Jungla and Mangal Ram, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 43.82 litres of liquor from a co‑accused's residence. They argued that they have clean antecedents, were not caught in …
The petitioner, Vikash Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 82.5 litres of liquor. The petitioner argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, …
The petitioner, Saryu Chaudhary, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(A) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of ten litres of liquor from his residence. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested, …
The petitioner, Pramod Ray, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 1,000 litres of liquor from a sack near the Ganga river. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no possession of the liquor, and that the location was a public area …
The Patna High Court considered an application for anticipatory bail filed by Sunil Rajbanshi, who was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor and 3000 litres of fermented Jawa Mahua solution near Kolwa …
The petitioner, Hemant Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that the recovery of 11.7 litres of liquor was made from a location not belonging to him and was based solely on a confessional statement made by Sadanand Rai in …
The appellant, Ravi Ranjan Kumar, was charged under several IPC sections and Sections 3(i)(r)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting a complainant and stealing a vehicle key and money. He sought anticipatory bail, which was denied by the Special Judge. The appellant …
The petitioner, Punit Rai, was implicated in a case under Section 111 of the BNS read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 43.2 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, was not apprehended at the spot, did not have possession of …
The petitioner sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 531 litres of liquor were recovered from a pickup vehicle he was driving, though he claimed no ownership or conscious possession and a clean antecedent. The …
The petitioner, Ajay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 4.5 litres of liquor from a bush. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the FIR omitted the informant's name, …
Akshay Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 alleging he was involved in the recovery of 56.7 litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard that does not belong to him. The petitioner claimed a clean …
The petitioner, Rajan Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 317(5) of the BNS and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that he was not arrested at the scene, had no conscious possession of the seized liquor, and was implicated …
The petitioner, Om Prakash Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 790.56 litres of liquor from an orchard not owned by him, claiming he was implicated solely on the basis of a chowkidar's information without any material seized from his …
