Created by Fuzzy Cloud

SATYAVRAT VERMA

5892 judgments · newest first · showing 3801–4000

Chhaparahi Devi @ Gita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Chhaparahi Devi, a woman with a clean criminal record, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged possession of 15 litres of liquor. The petitioner argued that she was not …

Rakesh GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rakesh Gupta, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 138.04 litres of liquor from five motorcycles. He claimed he was not in possession of the seized items, was not the …

Bijendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bijendra Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 (as amended in 2022), for alleged recovery of 69.84 litres of liquor from an E‑rickshaw he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was unaware that Vijay …

Amar ChaudhariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Amar Chaudhari, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 50 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, …

Dhirendar Mehta @ TunnuversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Dhirendar Mehta, filed an anticipatory bail application in the Patna High Court. He later sought permission to withdraw that application and instead surrender to the trial court to seek regular bail. The learned counsel for the petitioner argued for withdrawal, and the court granted …

Shankar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shankar Yadav applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering liquor concealed in a vegetable field adjacent to his house. He asserted a clean criminal record and argued that the alleged contraband was not found in …

Santosh Kumar Yadav @ Santosh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Kumar Yadav applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of 270 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and the case relied solely on a …

Manju Kunwar @ Manju KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manju Kunwar, a widow, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of liquor from her joint family house and a nearby bush. She contended that she was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and …

SADHU HALWAI @ NISHU HALWAIversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sadhu Halwai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 215.460 litres of liquor and a motorcycle from a public riverbank. He argued that he was not caught in possession, the seized items did not …

Amar RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Amar Ray, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging that 18 litres of liquor were recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in …

Shard Singh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shard Singh Yadav, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 62 litres of liquor were recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of …

Sanjay ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjay Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of liquor from his house and related premises. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, that the liquor was …

Arvind Paswan @ Arvind KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Arvind Paswan sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 113.70 litres of liquor in his cowshed. He argued that the liquor was not in his immediate possession, the cowshed was …

MD. IZHARUL ISLAMversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md Izharul Islam, owner of a pickup vehicle, was implicated in a case alleging the recovery of 1,074.420 litres of liquor from his vehicle, violating Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting a clean criminal …

Nandani KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nandani Kumari, sought anticipatory bail after her husband and an associate were apprehended with ten litres of liquor from a motorcycle registered in her name. She argued that she had no knowledge of the alleged offence, possessed a clean antecedent, and that ownership of the …

Rajesh RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rajesh Rai applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 210 litres of liquor. He argued that …

Vikash Kumar @ Bikku @ Vikku KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vikash Kumar, a resident of Samastipur, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 241.92 litres of liquor from a vehicle he did not own. The petitioner asserted a clean criminal record and argued that …

Rakesh RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rakesh Ray, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018 for allegedly transporting 60 litres of liquor in his motorcycle, although the liquor was not found in his conscious possession and he claimed ignorance of his friend’s misuse of …

Shrawan Kumar @ Shrawan kumar Singh @ Shrawan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shrawan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 1,036.080 litres of liquor from a location beside a school. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the site was public, and the informant’s …

Dilip Yadav @ Dilip Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dilip Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 1,486.56 litres of liquor near a motorcycle. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not …

Ranjit PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjit Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274, 275, 3(5) BNS and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022. He contended that the alleged liquor recovery (6.6 litres from Dharmendra's house and 21.3 litres from Ram …

Godhan Kumar @ Godhan MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Godhan Kumar and Vicky Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that the alleged liquor recovery was not from their possession and that the investigation was mechanically driven. The State opposed …

Neeraj Ray @ Neeraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Neeraj Ray, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 35 litres of liquor from a bush, though no liquor was found in his possession and the alleged site does not belong to him. He claimed a clean criminal record and argued that the …

Abhishek Kumar @ Abhishek Kumar GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for the alleged recovery of 22.6 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, had a clean …

Manohar Yadav @ Manohar Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manohar Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 306 litres of liquor near the Bagmati river. The petitioner argued that he was not caught in possession, the liquor was recovered from a public area, …

Nawneet Singh @ Tuddu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nawneet Singh, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 656.61 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not arrested, the alleged liquor was …

Rajesh GiriversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rajesh Giri sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 36 litres of liquor from his residence, which is a joint family property. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor and that the 2018 amendment to …

Baban Rai @ Baban KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Baban Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 900 ml of liquor recovered from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not caught in the act, had no conscious possession, and was implicated based on a chowkidar's …

Yaswant Kumar MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Yaswant Kumar Mandal applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly recovering 5 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in …

Reeta DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Reeta Devi, a woman with two prior excise cases, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 221, 262, 263 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. She alleged false implication by an informant and argued that …

SANNI KUMAR RAYversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanni Kumar Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 22.5 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that no liquor was found in his personal possession, the …

Rajesh Kumar HansdaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajesh Kumar Hansda, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case alleging he possessed 10 litres of liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was found in a joint family house, and he had …

Mantosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mantosh Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 12 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was unaware that …

Ashok Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ashok Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018/2022 for alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was …

Indrajeet SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Indrajeet Sahni, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 71.28 litres of liquor from a public place and asserting that nothing was found in his possession. He highlighted his …

Nirmal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Nirmal Kumar and Harendra Ram, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 250 litres of liquor from a sack. They contended that they were not apprehended at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and were …

Devendra Bhagat @ Jhagru BhagatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Devendra Bhagat, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 116.640 litres of liquor from a public bush near his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the location was accessible to the public, and the …

Subham KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Subham Kumar, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 56(b) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 123.12 litres of liquor from his Maruti Suzuki car. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and that the vehicle was …

Ladan Kumar @ Laddan Kumar @ Rameshwar MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ladan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 132.74 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, that the concept of deemed …

Dharmendra Sah @ Dharmendra Kumar @ Dharmendra PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dharmendra Sah, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, alleging that liquor was planted at his premises and that he was not in possession of the seized vehicle or liquor. He argued that the investigation was based on …

Yogendra BindversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Yogendra Bind, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 5.7 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, the liquor was not in his …

Dharmendra PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Dharmendra Paswan sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 117.68 litres of liquor from his residence. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the scene, and that the liquor was located in a joint family …

Kolai MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kolai Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 444 litres of liquor from a paddy field adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the recovery was …

Praduman ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Praduman Chaudhary, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly transporting 29.850 litres of liquor on a motorcycle registered in his wife's name. He contended that he was not apprehended at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, …

Jhagru Mukhiya @ Jhagru BinversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jhagru Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that the alleged seizure of 40 litres of liquor occurred in a public area and that he was not in possession at the time. He argued that the complainant (the …

Shankar Rai @ Shiv Shankar RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shankar Rai sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging that 44.55 litres of liquor were recovered from his cowshed. The petitioner contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the cowshed was accessible to …

Munna KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Munna Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with offences under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Excise Act, alleging that the liquor seized from a scooty belonged to a friend and that he was not in possession at the time of the alleged …

Saddam Ansari @ Mir SaddamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Saddam Ansari, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 189 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, based primarily on a confessional statement made by Dinesh while in police custody. The petitioner argued that he was not caught in …

Dashai MusaharversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dashai Musahar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that liquor recovered from his joint family house was not in his conscious possession and that he was implicated by an inimical watchman. …

Rajkishor Yadav @ Rajkishor YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajkishor Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 30 litres of liquor were recovered from a location not belonging to him and that he was implicated by a hostile chowkidar. …

Lalbabu Mahto @ Lal Babu MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Lalbabu Mahto was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 41(1) and 41(2) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 2,205 litres of liquor from a truck. He has fifteen prior excise cases and claims he was not caught in possession nor is he the owner of the seized vehicle, asserting that …

Manoj Kumar @ Manoj RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 43.74 litres of liquor from two vehicles. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicles, and the case was based solely on a …

Ajit YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajit Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 350 litres of liquor from his vehicle. He argued that he was not present at the spot of …

Idi FarhanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Idi Farhan applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, relating to the recovery of 19.095 litres of liquor from his …

Prema DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three residents of Utara village, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case (PS‑Case No. 372 of 2025) alleging that 8.6 litres of liquor were recovered from their jointly‑owned house, contravening Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, …

Aklu SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Aklu Sahani, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from a motorcycle owned by his wife. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor, and was implicated merely …

Rahul Singh @ Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rahul Singh applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 14.4 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no …

Mithu DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mithu Devi, the owner of a motorcycle from which 13.5 litres of liquor was recovered, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with an offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. She argued that she had no prior criminal record, was …

Chhathu Kumar @ Chhotu Kumar @ Kalalu @ KalluversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chhathu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that the liquor recovered was from premises unrelated to him and that a confessional statement obtained in police custody lacked …

Ajeet Kumar @ Ghughan @ Sanjeev KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajeet Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 80 litres of liquor from a forest area near a river. He asserted a clean antecedent, no possession of the liquor, and that the allegation was …

Saheb KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Saheb Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 105 litres of liquor from bags kept in front of a temple. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and that the …

Kaka Rawani @ Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Kaka Rawani and Deepak Rawani, proprietors of a hotel in Gaya, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016 for allegedly storing 38.5 litres of liquor and Rs.868 on the hotel roof. They argued they have clean antecedents, the …

Santosh Kumar @ MalluversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Kumar, a resident of Pakari village, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case (PS. Case No.242/2025) alleging that 53 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle linked to him, invoking Section 317(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and …

Suraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Suraj Kumar and Kapildeo Mistry applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 150 litres of liquor from a Hyundai car. They contended that they have clean antecedents, were not in possession of the …

Chunni DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chunni Devi, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly having 10 litres of liquor recovered from the courtyard of her joint family house. She contended that she had no conscious possession, the property is jointly owned, and she has a clean …

Subhash Kumar @ BulletversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Subhash Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 105 litres of liquor from a pond area not belonging to him. He argued he has a clean antecedent and that the liquor was not found in his …

Asha SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Asha Singh, sought anticipatory bail after a police case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the recovery of 1.875 litres of liquor from a scooter she owned. She argued that she was not present at the scene, the liquor was not in her conscious possession, …

AshirwadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ashirwad Ojha, a restaurant owner, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 30(e) and 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 15 ml of liquor and three empty bottles recovered from his premises. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, that the …

Prakash Mahto @ Pragash MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners Prakash Mahto and Harindra Mahto applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 81,600 litres of liquor from three motorcycles. They argued they were not caught in possession, were not owners of the seized …

Ashok YadawversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ashok Yadaw, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 30.420 litres of liquor from a sack near his village. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the location did not belong to him, and the …

Anil Sahni @ Anil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anil Sahni, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that the alleged seizure of 12 litres of spirit occurred at a location adjacent to his property and that no contraband was found in his possession. He …

Kishor YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Kishor Yadav, owner of one of three motorcycles from which 105 litres of liquor were seized, applied for anticipatory bail after fearing arrest under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware …

Dhanji PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dhanji Prasad, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from his motorcycle, although the liquor was not found in his possession and he claims he was unaware of any misuse of the vehicle. He asserted a clean …

Sanjeet RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjeet Rai, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that the liquor seized from a ditch did not belong to him and that he was implicated solely on secret information without proper investigation. He argued that …

Mukesh Gupta @ Mukesh PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

D.F.D. (PRE-EMPTORY)

Mukesh Gupta and Uttam Gupta filed Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.2119 of 2025 before the Patna High Court challenging a decision of the lower court. The respondents were the State of Bihar and Puja Kumari. No counsel appeared on behalf of the appellants, while the State was represented by learned Special …

Jagarnath SahversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Jagarnath Sah was charged under Sections 302 and 201 of the IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for the death of the mother‑in‑law of the informant, Mantut Devi. The Special Judge had rejected his application for anticipatory bail, relying on the FIR and the …

NANHAK YADAV @ NANK YADAV @ NANHKU YADAVversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nanahk Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 250 litres of liquor, of which 100 litres were said to have been found in his motorcycle. He contended that he was not present at the spot, had no conscious possession of …

Ranjit Kumar @ Ranjit YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 164.4 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he was not present at the spot of seizure, had …

Priyanshu JaiswalversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The appellant, Priyanshu Jaiswal, filed a criminal appeal before the Patna High Court challenging the conviction by the State of Bihar and Abhishek Kumar Gond. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant was arrested by the police. The appellant’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the …

Sakuntla Devi @ Shakunti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Sakuntla Devi, a Scheduled Caste woman, appealed against the refusal of anticipatory bail in a case where she was charged under several IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly abusing and snatching the mobile of an Assistant Settlement Officer. She contended that the …

Muzaffar Hussain @ Md. Muzaffar HussainversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, four residents of Kachna village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar National Security Act, 2023, alleging they formed an unlawful assembly, created a ruckus, and assaulted police while demanding the release of a …

Golden Ansari @ Ahsan AlamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, four residents of Bela village in Gurua, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case (PS Case No.303 of 2025) that alleged offences under Sections 109, 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 132, 190, 191(2), 191(3), 196 and 299 of the B.N.S. The petitioners contended they have …

RAVEESH KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Raveesh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act, 2023, alleging assault and theft. He asserted a clean antecedent and contended that the FIR only implicated him in the alleged snatching of a chain, not in …

Kavita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners—Kavita Devi, Tapeshwar Ram and Roshan Ram—applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S., alleging that they were falsely implicated by an informant with whom they have a property dispute. The informant claimed that on 7 September 2025 the …

Prabhash kumar Yadav @ Prabhash YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, three residents of Barsam village, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (PS Case No.84/2024) involving offences under Sections 189(4), 126(2), 115(2), 109, 117(2), 352 and 351(2) of the Bihar Non‑Compete Statutes, 2023. They claimed they have clean …

Karu Prasad @ Rajeev Ranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Karu Prasad, also known as Rajeev Ranjan Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving offences under Sections 147, 149, 188, 341, 342, 332, 353, 307, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The police seized a motorcycle registered in his name, which his son Kattappa …

Maran Paswan @ Vivek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Maran Paswan applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023. He asserted a clean antecedent, claimed the allegations were false and stemmed from a neighbourly dispute, and …

Amarnath SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners Amarnath, Ram Janam and Prabhu Sahani filed an anticipatory bail application in a case involving alleged offences under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 and the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. The petitioners sought to withdraw the application for Amarnath and Prabhu, …

Nisha DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nisha Devi, owner of a motorcycle, was implicated in a case (PS Case No. 481 of 2023) for alleged possession of 108 litres of liquor, alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018. She applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that she has a …

Dinesh Kumar @ Dinesh PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dinesh Kumar, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 37 and 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 after 2.235 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle and another motorcycle was seized. Although the liquor was not found in his possession and …

Ram Yadav @ Ram Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Ram Yadav filed an anticipatory bail application before this Court. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then moved the Court seeking permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The State opposed the withdrawal. The Court, after hearing both sides, granted permission …

MANOJ SAHANI @ MANOJ KUMAR @ BIRODHI SAHANIversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Sahani applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case alleging recovery of 160 litres of liquor, offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the …

DIPAK MAHTOversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Dipak Mahto filed an anticipatory bail application but inadvertently submitted it as a regular bail petition. During the pendency of the application he was arrested, and he sought the court’s permission to withdraw the bail petition. The court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the …

Bipin Kumar @ Bipin BihariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bipin Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of liquor. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the scene, and the allegation was based solely on a confessional statement of …

Deepak Kumar Yadav @ Dipak YadavversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal miscellaneous case. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court granted the permission, resulting in the anticipatory bail …

Sanju DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanju Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act involving alleged recovery of liquor. She argued that the liquor was not in her conscious possession, the location was public, and the complaint was based on the testimony of a …

Lalbabu Ram @ Lalbabu Kumar RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Lalbabu Ram, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 5.8 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which he claims is joint family property and that he had no conscious possession. He …

Satyendra RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Satyendra Rai, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 and Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, relating to the alleged recovery of 1,840 litres of liquor from a pickup vehicle. He argued that …

ArsadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Arsad and Bipta, residents of Bhagwanpur village, filed a petition seeking anticipatory bail after learning that they might be arrested in a case (PS No.259/2025) involving alleged offences under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances (B.N.S) Act and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, …

Upendra SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Upendra Singh, applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 390 litres of liquor were recovered from motorcycles and a bag linked to him. He argued that he was not in …

Niraj DasversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Niraj Das, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 8.7 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that the vehicle was registered in his …

Dipak PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dipak Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 15 litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, that the concept of …

Roshan Kumar Mandal @ Raushan Kumar MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Roshan Kumar Mandal, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor from a cattle‑shed behind his house. He argued that he was never arrested at the spot, that the liquor was not in his …

Surendra Singh @ Surendra Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Surendra Singh applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018/2022 for alleged recovery of 354.81 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, had no …

Babita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Babita Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 36 litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned. She argued that …

Guddu SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Sahani applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging that the alleged liquor recovery was from a field not belonging to him and that no liquor was found in his possession. The petitioner argued that the police …

Vijay Chaudhary @ Vijay ChaudhariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Vijay Chaudhary and Deepak Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 45 litres of liquor from a location not belonging to them. They argued that no liquor was found in their possession and that the …

Appu ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, four members of the Manjhi family, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case alleging offences under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from their jointly owned …

Arjun Chaudhary @ Arun ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Arjun Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where three litres of liquor were recovered from his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the house is a …

Bikku Sahani @ Bikku KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Bikku Sahani, a resident of East Champaran, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for allegedly recovering 50 litres of liquor from a sack. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the …

Govind KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Govind Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 5 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession, that he was unaware his friend misused the vehicle, …

Sonarwa DeviversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Sonarwa Devi, was arrested in connection with a criminal case and had filed an anticipatory bail application. While the application was pending, her counsel sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail. The court considered whether a petitioner may withdraw an …

Ravi Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravi Kumar Singh, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of five litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle and that the actual offender fled the scene, …

Anuj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, four residents of Buchchi village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No. 330 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 126(2), 127(2), 118(1), 115(2), 110, 191(1), 192 and 190 of the BNS. They claimed to have a clean antecedent and argued that the informant’s …

Mithun KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, five residents of Buchchi village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Nardiganj PS Case No.330 of 2025) that alleged offences under Sections 126(2), 127(2), 118(1), 115(2), 110, 191(1), 192 and 190 of the Bihar Narcotic and Smuggling Act. They contended that the …

Sikandar Singh @ Sikandra Singh @ Sikandra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sikandar Singh, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of the seized vehicle, was …

Sonelal MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sonelal Mukhiya applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for alleged recovery of 95 litres of liquor from another's land. He asserted a clean criminal record, no possession of the liquor, and …

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018 for alleged possession of 10 litres of liquor at his house and 16 litres at a nearby location, though no liquor was recovered from his immediate possession and the house is a …

Guddu Kumar @ Abhishek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Guddu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of over 3,200 litres of liquor from vehicles linked to him. He argued that he was not in possession of the seized …

Mahesh MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mahesh Mahto, the owner of a motorcycle from which 8.205 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 274, 275, 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was …

Laxman Mallik @ Laxman Kumar @ Laxmana kumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Laxman Mallik, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of 117 litres of liquor from a public bush and a motorcycle not owned by him. He …

JITENDRA SAHNIversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Jitendra Sahni and Arvind Sahni filed an anticipatory bail application in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. Arvind was arrested while the application was pending, and the petitioners sought to withdraw his anticipatory bail request, which the Court permitted, …

Ranju DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ranju Devi applied for anticipatory bail after learning that she might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 20 litres of liquor and 300 litres of Jawa Mahua solution from her residence. She contended that she was …

Bulet Yadav @ Bulat YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Bulat Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 65.820 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a vehicle he did not own. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was …

Rameshwar SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rameshwar Sah, owner of a truck, was implicated in the seizure of 2,356.720 liters of liquor from his vehicle in a case under the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not caught with the liquor, and that the driver acted without his knowledge. The State …

Banti KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Banti Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 250 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the …

Kanhaiya RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kanhaiya Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He contended that he had only one prior case under the Excise Act, whereas the impugned order mistakenly …

Satan Mukhiya @ Santan MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Satan Mukhiya applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged possession of 7 litres of liquor recovered from a paddy field and his house. He argued that the liquor was found in a …

Dharmendra Kumar @ Dharmendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Dharmendra Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Sections 47(a) and (f) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 60 litres of liquor and 400 litres of fermented jawa mahua from a public drain. The petitioner …

Anil SardarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anil Sardar, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 104 litres of liquor from locations adjacent to his house. He argued that no liquor was found in his conscious possession and that the …

Suresh PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Suresh Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of four litres of liquor from his house, which is a joint family property. He contended that the prosecution’s claim of two prior cases …

Sikandar @ Golu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Sikandar and Rohit, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of 78 litres of liquor. They argued that the alleged …

Sandeep Yadav @ Sandeep Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Sandeep Yadav, was charged under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, IPC and IT Act for alleged rape, robbery and related offences, based on the victim's claim that she was assaulted, filmed and threatened. The appellant contended he had a clean record, that the allegations were …

Arjun KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Arjun Kumar, the owner of a motorcycle from which 50 litres of liquor was seized, filed a petition for anticipatory bail under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, claiming he had no knowledge of the liquor and was not in possession. He argued that he had a clean antecedent and …

Ramakant MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramakant Mahto, applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 50 litres of liquor were recovered from a sack not in his possession and that he has a clean antecedent. The prosecution opposed the …

Raju RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raju Ram, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of five litres of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the scene, …

Munna MiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, five residents of Areraj, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. They alleged that the informant, a neighbour, fabricated the charges stemming from a dispute over a …

SIKENDAR KUMAR @ GOLU KUMAR @ Sikender @ GoluversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sikendar Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that the alleged liquor recovery was not from his possession and that the police investigation …

Babita KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Babita Kumari, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 735 ml of liquor from a motorcycle she owned. She argued that she had no prior criminal record, was not present at the spot of seizure, and …

Satyendra Kumar @ Satyendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Satyendra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 160 litres of liquor from a location not owned by him. He has eight prior criminal cases, seven of which are also under the Excise Act. The petitioner argued that he …

Bindeshwar Mahto @ BinoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bindeshwar Mahto, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 922 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which he claims is joint family property and not under his conscious possession. He argued that the concept of deemed …

Gaurav KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gaurav Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 7.250 litres of liquor from a scooter he owned. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession and that he was unaware of his friend's misuse of the vehicle. …

Chunnu Paswan @ Chunnu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chunnu Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 113.70 litres of liquor from a cattle shed belonging to another person. He argued that he had …

Munna SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Munna Sah, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 4.5 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession and that he was unaware of his friend's alleged misuse of the …

Bhadai Paswan @ Bhaday Paswan @ Bhadaya PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bhadai Paswan, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for allegedly possessing 3.96 litres of liquor recovered from his house. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was located in a …

Sonu Ray @ Sonu kumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 879.525 litres of liquor from a room in front of a government boring. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his …

Aditya KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Aditya Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 14.625 litres of liquor from a location in front of a government residence. He contended he had a clean antecedent, was not caught with the liquor, and …

Trivuwan Chaudhary @ Tiraguna ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Trivuwan Chaudhary, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor from a scooty registered in his wife's name. The petitioner …

Ramadhar Sahani @ Nagendra SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ramadhar Sahani applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of liquor. He argued that the liquor was seized from a location not belonging to him, that he had no conscious possession, and that …

Rajeshwar PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajeshwar Pandey, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, where liquor was allegedly recovered from a pickup vehicle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, did not possess the seized …

Lalpari DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Lalpari Devi and Nelu Devi, wives of Anil and Sunil Sahni, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 15 litres of liquor recovered from their joint family house. They applied for anticipatory bail, arguing they …

Dilip kumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Dilip Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 alleging recovery of 26 litres of liquor from a co‑accused’s possession and a garbage heap. The petitioner argued that nothing was recovered from his …

Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 42 litres of liquor concealed near his relative's house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the recovery site did not …

Surendra Kumar @ Kariya @ Surendra RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three residents of Chakiyaz Tola, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 1,000 litres of liquor. They contended that they were not caught in possession, did not own the seized vehicle, …

Shakil Ahamad Khan @ Shakeel Ahamad KhanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shakil Ahamad Khan, the owner of a vehicle from which 987.6 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, claiming he had no knowledge of the driver’s alleged misuse and possessed a clean antecedent. The State opposed the bail. The Court, after …

Anil NatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Anil Nat and his wife Sugan Devi, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 190 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to their house. The petitioners contended that the liquor …

Birendra Yadav @ Virendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Birendra Yadav, owner of a vehicle from which 40.125 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued he had a clean antecedent and was unaware that the vehicle would be misused by another person, Kundan, who …

Tara DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Tara Devi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 90 litres of liquor from her joint family house. The petitioner argued that she was not arrested, the liquor was not in her …

Gautam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gautam Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 38(1) and 38(2) of the Bihar Excise Act relating to alleged recovery of liquor from another accused, Indrajeet. He argued that he was not caught in possession and that the case against him was based …

Kamlesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kamlesh Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 70 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor, did not own the …

Ranjan KewatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjan Kewat, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor recovered from his house and that of another. He argued that the liquor was located in a joint family property, he had no …

Shani KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shani Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 225.375 litres of liquor from a car and motorcycles. The petitioner argued he was not caught in possession, did not own the seized vehicles, and the case was based solely on …

Vijendra Mukiya @ Vijendra MukhiaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vijendra Mukiya, a resident of Samastipur, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor from the houses of Ganesh, Santosh, and Pawan Devi. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, …

Nilu Singh @ Nilesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nilu Singh, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 126 litres of liquor from an e‑rickshaw, which he claimed he did not own or possess. He argued that the police had implicated him based on information from a spy without …

MITHUN RAI @ MITHUN RAY @ MITHUN KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mithun Rai sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 164.160 litres of liquor from a Tata Magic vehicle. He contended he was not caught with the liquor, was not the owner of the vehicle, and was merely a chowkidar, arguing …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 33.1 litres of liquor from a Toto rickshaw he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, …

Dheeraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Subhash Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 46 litres of liquor were recovered from a bush adjacent to his field, with no possession or arrest at the spot. He argued that the police mechanically …

Vimal Devi @ Vimla DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Vimal Devi, Kundan Kumar and Chandan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, relating to the alleged recovery of …

Bipin Singh @ Vipin Bihari SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Bipin Singh and Ramnath Mahto, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 318 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, and Section 11 of the Public Gambling Act. They contended that the alleged …

Ajay Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ajay Kumar Sah applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 36 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was implicated merely as …

Apsana KhatunversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Apsana Khatun, sought anticipatory bail after a seizure of 15,600 litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned, alleging she was unaware of her friend's misuse of the vehicle and had no possession of the liquor. The State opposed the bail, citing offences under Sections 30(a), …

Ratan Kumar @ Triloki SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ratan Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging recovery of 8.1 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, the seized …

Akshay Kumar @ Akshay MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Akshay Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 132.74 litres of liquor from his house, which is a joint family property. The petitioner …

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 1,300 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor nor aware that the vehicle would be used for the alleged offence, …

Munni Devi @ Kaushalaya DeviversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Munni Devi filed an anticipatory bail application under the criminal procedure. While the application was pending, she was arrested. Her counsel then sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court granted the request, allowing the withdrawal. Consequently, the …

Balram MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Balram Mukhiya applied for anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 2 litres of liquor and 20 litres of jawa mahua from his under‑construction house. The petitioner claimed he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was planted by …

Amit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Amit Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for allegedly possessing two litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the liquor, and that his brother had …

Subhash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Subhash Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 46 litres of liquor from a bush adjacent to his field. He argued that he was not in possession, the alleged liquor was …

CHINTA DEVIversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chinta Devi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 12.5 litres of liquor. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that the …

Sunil Sahani @ RajaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunil Sahani, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 85 litres of liquor from the Dhanauti river. The petitioner argued that he was not …

Jitendra RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jitendra Rai, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor and mahua. He asserted a clean criminal record and argued that the alleged …

Shiv Pujan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Shiv Pujan Kumar and Suma Kumari, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Sections 30(A) and 32(C) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 13.65 litres of beer from a motorcycle they owned. They argued they …

Dharamveer KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dharamveer Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail after a police case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 21 litres of liquor from an abandoned bag at Barauni Railway Station, where his identity card was found. He contended that he was not …

Janki ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Janki Chaudhary, was implicated in an excise case for alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from his motorcycle, though the liquor was seized from another individual and not found in his possession. He asserted a clean criminal record and claimed he was unaware that the vehicle …

Ankit Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ankit Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018, alleging that he was implicated solely on a confessional statement of another person and that no liquor was recovered from his possession. He has three …

Santu Choudhary @ Santu Chaudhary @ Sanatu ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Santu Choudhary, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged possession of 200 litres of liquor. He claimed a clean antecedent and argued that the alleged liquor …

Rahul Kumar SafiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rahul Kumar Safi applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that he was implicated based on a police‑custody confessional statement of another person and that no liquor was recovered from his possession. …

Vinay Mahto @ Vinay Kumar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The appellants, six individuals from Borbara village, appealed against the Special Judge’s order dated 15‑02‑2025 that rejected their application for anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under several IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. They contended that they were …

Rakesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The appellant, Rakesh Kumar, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, challenging an order dated 19‑06‑2025 passed by the Exclusive Special Judge, SC/ST (POA) Act, Nawada. While the appeal was pending, the …

Gajraj Yadav @ Dharamdeo Yadav @ Gajrai YadavversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Gajraj Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from a 2012 police station case. During the hearing on 2 February 2026, counsel for the petitioner informed the court that the petitioner intended to surrender and had instructions to …

Kumud RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Kumud Rai, a woman with a clean antecedent, sought anticipatory bail after the police seized 265.5 litres of liquor from a Scorpio vehicle she owned, alleging she was involved in an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. She argued she was not in possession of the …

Md. Niyamat Ali @ Md. NiyamatversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, six residents of Akabarpur village, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S. relating to offences such as unlawful assembly, rioting, and assault. They alleged that the FIR, based on an informant's account, falsely …

Md. JakirversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, four residents of Rampatti village, were implicated in a case arising from an altercation at a Tazia fair on disputed land, where an informant alleged they assaulted him for video‑recording women. The petitioners contend they have clean antecedents (except two with a prior case) and …

Durgesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Durgesh Yadav filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case (PS Case No. 92 of 2025) pending before the Patna High Court. The petitioner was represented by Advocate Dewanand Tiwari, while the State of Bihar was represented by Advocate Manoj Kumar. During the hearing, counsel for the …

Lalita Devi @ Lila DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 303(2), 109, 352 and 191(2) of the B.N.S. alleging assault, robbery and other offences arising from a land‑related dispute. The petitioners contended that the case was false, that the informant …

Veer KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Veer Kumar and Bala Ji, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging offences under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act, 2023, including unlawful assembly and assault on police. They contended that they were falsely implicated due to prior excise …