Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
5892 judgments · newest first · showing 4001–4200
The petitioner, Ramesh Thakur, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in an FIR alleging multiple offences under the BNS, based on the informant's claim that he participated in an assault on 06-09-2025. The petitioner argued he has a clean antecedent and that the FIR’s allegations are …
The petitioners, four Paswan brothers, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 117(2), 109, 76, 352 and 351(2) of the B.N.S., 2023, arising from an altercation at Maa Kali Temple where they allegedly objected to others sitting in the temple on the basis of their belief …
Shiv Kumar Sardar applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 alleging that 75 litres of liquor were recovered from a straw house on his premises. The petitioner argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not …
The petitioner, Sunil Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018, for allegedly possessing 360 ml of liquor in a scooty he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the scene, and was …
Anila Devi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor from a third party and from her joint family house. She argued that she had no conscious possession, the FIR did not …
The petitioner, Gopal Prasad, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for the alleged recovery of 25 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was …
Manji Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 92.8 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. The petitioner argued he had no prior criminal record, was not arrested at the …
The petitioner, Sikendar Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that 70 litres of liquor were recovered from a public place and not from his …
The petitioners, three residents of Heera Tola, Patna, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 880 litres of liquor from two breweries. They contended that the liquor was not in their conscious …
Shravan Kumar Yadav petitioned the Patna High Court for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, concerning the alleged recovery of 801.100 litres …
Jhuni Khatoon, the wife of Raushan Shah, applied for anticipatory bail in an excise case where 22 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle she owned. She argued that she had a clean antecedent, was a woman, and had no conscious possession of the liquor, which was seized from the vehicle and …
The petitioner, Sanoj Sahani, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He asserted that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor, and was …
Kishun Sahni applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that the only evidence against him is a confessional statement made by another accused in police custody and that he was not caught in possession of …
The petitioners, three members of the Manjhi family, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case (PS‑395/2025) alleging offences under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 8.5 litres of liquor from their joint family …
The petitioner, Akash Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that he was implicated based on a confessional statement made by another person in police custody and that no liquor was recovered from his …
The petitioners, Herod Singh, Bhola Singh and Chandan Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 37(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. They contended they have clean antecedents and …
The petitioner, Ajay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC Sections 272 and 273 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, alleging that the alleged liquor and Mahua Jaggery solution were not recovered from his possession. He has two prior excise …
The petitioner, Gautam Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning of a pending case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 11 litres of liquor from a bush not belonging to him. He argued that the FIR lacked the informant’s name and that no liquor was found in his …
The petitioner, Akshay Lal Bind, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for alleged possession of 34 litres of liquor recovered from his house and a field. He argued that the liquor was not in his …
The petitioners, Lala Sahni and Shankar Sahni, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 200 litres of liquor from a location not belonging to them. They argued they have a clean criminal …
Petitioner Karu Miyan sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 alleging recovery of 85 litres of liquor and 1,000 litres of Mahua jaggery from a bamboo orchard not owned by him. He asserted a clean antecedent and …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 21.75 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not the owner of the vehicle, that the liquor was not seized from his conscious possession, and that his …
The petitioner, Rajendra Sinha, was implicated in a case alleging the recovery of five litres of liquor from a school van, alleged to be a violation of Sections 30(a), 32 and 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean antecedent and that the alleged offence was …
Shyam Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(A) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 11.90 litres of liquor from a field near an under‑construction house belonging to his family. The petitioner …
Shivshankar Chouhan applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, involving the alleged recovery of 144 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, …
Lakhiya Murmu applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Special Statutes (BNSS) in connection with offences under Sections 191(2), 190, 132, 262, 263 of the BNSS and Sections 30(a) and 45 of the Excise Act. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent and that the …
The petitioner, Vibhesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a), 44, 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the seized liquor, and was not the …
Barun Kumar Singh, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case alleging recovery of 240 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued that he had a clean criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor, and …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, involving alleged recovery of 3,335.4 litres of liquor from a truck. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the liquor, was …
Petitioners Gauri Devi and Dwarika Sah sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 7.450 litres of liquor was allegedly recovered from a pit in their jointly owned house. They argued that no liquor was found in their conscious …
Bulet Yadav was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 291.84 litres of liquor from a modified three‑wheeler, although he was not apprehended on the spot and claimed he was not the vehicle's owner. He has six prior criminal cases, three of which …
The petitioner, Prakash Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, for allegedly possessing 24.660 litres of liquor recovered from a pick‑up vehicle he owned. He argued that he had no conscious …
The petitioner, Deepak Sah, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor from an open field belonging to Ravindra Sah. He argued that he was not caught in possession, the liquor was not on his property, and the informant’s …
The petitioners, Sarvan Kumar and Ramjanm Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 57.75 litres of liquor from a cowshed. They argued that the liquor was not in their conscious possession …
Arvind Sahni sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 30(c) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act, where the police alleged recovery of liquor and raw material from a public mango orchard based largely on a confessional statement of a co-accused in custody. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Sunil Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 35.395 litres of liquor from his sister's house. He argued that he was not arrested on the …
Petitioners Raghu Kumar and Hari Sahni applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case alleging offences under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, involving the alleged recovery of liquor from sacks and a motorcycle. They contended that they were …
Kalendra Chaudhary was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 25 litres of liquor from his house, which is part of a joint‑family property. He contended that no liquor was found in his conscious possession, that …
The petitioner, Lalit Sada, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 95 litres of liquor from a co‑accused's premises. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in his conscious …
Sunita Devi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case alleging offences under Sections 30(a), (b) and (c) of the Excise Act, where liquor was allegedly recovered from her husband’s house. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, was …
The petitioner, Mustak Ahmad, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 27 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not …
The petitioners, five residents of Harlochanpur, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Sections 126, 115(2), 132, 121(1), 121(2), 127(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging involvement in the …
Mahadev Sah applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 41 litres of liquor from a car. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, did not have …
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar Ray, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 171 litres of liquor from five motorcycles, though he was not caught in possession and is not the owner of the vehicles. The prosecution’s case relied on a confessional …
Dewanti Kumari applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, where 15 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle she owned. She argued that she had a clean antecedent, was not in actual …
The petitioner, Lavkush, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018/2022, alleging recovery of 50 litres of liquor from Mantu Kumar, with whom he has no relation. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no …
The petitioner, Nandlal Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016 for alleged possession of 50 litres of liquor recovered from his joint‑family house. He argued that no liquor was …
The petitioner, Ajeet Ray, was implicated in a case under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Sections 30(a), 32(i) and 41(i) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 4,406.4 litres of liquor. He claimed he was not in possession of the seized truck and …
Petitioner Rahul Singh sought anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case involving alleged seizure of 4,406.4 litres of liquor from a truck, under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic/Excise Act and Sections 30(a), 32(i) and 41(i) of the Bihar Excise Act. He …
The petitioner, Sunny Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 156 litres of liquor from an auto. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and was implicated solely on …
The petitioners sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act involving the alleged recovery of 164.805 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. They argued that the liquor was not in their conscious possession, they were not owners of the vehicles, and …
Sabir Husain applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 113.040 litres of liquor from his auto. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that …
Petitioners Pavan Mahto and Jitendra Mahto, accused under Sections 274, 275 BNS and 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for alleged possession of liquor and Mahua, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest. They contended that no arrest or seizure occurred at the spot, that the alleged …
The petitioner, Binod Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 575.28 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no …
Balram Singh applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Excise Act and Sections 351(2) and 351(3) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act for the alleged recovery of nine litres of liquor from his joint family house. The petitioner argued that he has a clean …
The petitioners, Dhuran Singh and Arvind Singh, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 1,036.80 litres of liquor from a bush near a school. They argued that they were not apprehended on the spot, the liquor was not found in their possession, …
Vimlesh Kumar, a resident of Buxar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018, concerning the recovery of 54.005 litres of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent and that the liquor was not …
The petitioner, Milind Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged possession of 750 ml of liquor in an e‑rickshaw. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not …
Mohan Singh sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving alleged seizure of 630 litres of liquor and two motorcycles, with offences under IPC sections 272, 273, 414 and 34 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, that the …
Satish Yadav sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 1486.56 litres of liquor and a motorcycle were seized. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the seized items, does …
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor from an open area near his house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and the …
Petitioner Premi Sahani sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for allegedly transporting 7 litres of liquor in his motorcycle. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor, was not in actual possession, …
The petitioner, Satyendra Dhangar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from a bush near his house. He asserted that he has a clean …
Shashi Kumar petitioned for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 1,000 litres of liquor and seizure of a motorcycle. He claimed he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and was implicated by a hostile …
The petitioners, Vikash Kumar, Niraj Kumar and Ugrim Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for the alleged recovery of 907.2 litres of liquor from a truck. They argued they had clean antecedents, were not …
Petitioner Pintu Kumar was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 7.5 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a friend misused his …
The petitioner, Anil Ray, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 133,500 litres of liquor from the house of the deceased Harihar Paswan. He contended that he was not present at the scene, had no possession of the liquor, and had no relationship with …
Gulshan Kumar Yadav was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 2,615.760 litres of liquor from two vehicles, under Sections 318(4), 317(5) and 61(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 30(a), 32(ii)(iii), 36 and 41(ii) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner, who has five …
The petitioner, Sikandar Kumar, was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 200 litres of liquor and 200 litres of jawa mahua from a forest, which were destroyed at the spot. The petitioner was not arrested at the scene and no liquor was found in his possession. …
Rohit Kumar was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 246 litres of liquor from an auto, charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was not arrested at the scene, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was not the owner of the vehicle, asserting …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 246 litres of liquor from an auto, alleged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had no prior criminal record, was not arrested at the spot, did not have the liquor in his conscious …
The petitioner, Sanjay Yadav, was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. He subsequently approached the court seeking permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the application should be withdrawn …
Munshilal Tudu was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application after the arrest. The Court considered whether a pending anticipatory bail application …
Lalan Singh and Rajan Singh were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 12 litres of liquor recovered from their house, which they claim is a joint family property and that they have no conscious possession. They argued that the 2018 amendment to …
Anil Choudhary filed a criminal miscellaneous petition (No.59557 of 2023) against the State of Bihar. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while counsel for the State was present. The matter was heard before Justice Satyavrat Verma on 31-01-2026. The court observed the absence of …
The petitioner, Munesh Kumar Sharma, owner of a vehicle from which 10,214.4 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail alleging he had no knowledge of the illicit use of his vehicle and maintains a clean criminal record. The State opposed the bail, contending the petitioner is implicated …
Jonsan Kumar was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending. He sought permission from the court to withdraw that application. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Amar Kumar Singh, requested the withdrawal, and the State’s counsel, Ms. Pushpa Sinha, was heard. The court granted …
The petitioner, Sahdeo Yadav, was implicated in a case concerning the seizure of 549 litres of liquor from a pickup vehicle he owned, though the liquor was not found in his possession at the time of arrest. He claimed to have a clean antecedent and argued that ownership of the vehicle alone should …
The petitioner, Aman Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 188, 290, 414 and 120B and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the seizure of 587.52 litres of liquor, part of which was recovered from his motorcycle and car. He argued that he …
Petitioners Parvjit Rai and Srikant Singh sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act and Section 3 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984. They contended that neither was arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in …
Petitioner Abdhesh Paswan sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for allegedly recovering 15 litres of liquor and 100 kg of Mahua flower from two motorcycles. He argued that he had …
The petitioner, Ranjit Prasad, filed a regular bail application before the Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from PS Hilsa, Nalanda. Counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Muskan Singh, appeared before the court and informed that the petitioner wished to withdraw the bail …
The petitioners, Hira Lal Das and Manish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 11.625 litres of liquor from a husk house. They argued that they were not arrested at the scene, no liquor was found in their …
The petitioner, Sakesh Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 120 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the vehicle's owner, and his name was omitted …
Petitioners Vinod Paswan and Avishek Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. They contended that the only evidence against them was a …
The petitioners, two brothers and their sister, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 and several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, alleging that liquor recovered from their father’s joint family house could not be …
The petitioners, Sonu Kumar Yadav and Raju Bind, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where the alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor was based solely on a confessional statement of another accused. The petitioners …
The petitioner, Ajay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that the liquor recovered from his joint family house was not in his conscious possession and that the concept of deemed possession …
The petitioner, Jugeshwar Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 50 litres of liquor and 7,000 litres of Mahua jawa were allegedly recovered from a public area near the Sone river. He argued that he was not arrested …
Anil Bhandari filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner then sought the court's permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The court granted permission for withdrawal, holding …
Shyam Mahto sought protection from arrest in a case registered under Section 21(C) of the NDPS Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that the seized 39 litres of cough syrup and 28.065 litres of liquor were recovered from a hut belonging to another person, Ram …
Sangita Devi applied for anticipatory bail after learning that she might be arrested under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 20,800 litres of liquor from her joint family house. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that no liquor …
Lav Kumar Singh, the owner of a house from which 150.230 litres of liquor were recovered, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, claiming he had no conscious possession and a clean antecedent. He argued that the police …
The petitioner, Sitaram Mukhiya, applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act alleging possession of 157.5 litres of liquor at his joint family house. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, the liquor was not in his conscious …
Petitioner Ranjeet Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and (c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 30 litres of liquor from his allegedly abandoned joint‑family house. He contended that no liquor was found …
The petitioner, Prabhu Chaudhary, filed an anticipatory bail application in the High Court of Patna. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner's counsel then sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application, arguing that the purpose …
The petitioner, Biru Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not in possession of the seized vehicle, was not arrested at the spot, and …
Four brothers, Pramod Kumar, Sonam Kumar, Sujit Kumar and Vijay Prasad, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners expressed difficulty in continuing the case and sought permission to withdraw the application. The court granted …
Reena Devi applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 for alleged possession of 34 litres of liquor in a half‑constructed house. The petitioner, a woman with two prior excise cases, argued that the liquor was not in her …
The petitioner, Tunni Devi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for the alleged recovery of 420 litres of liquor from two auto-rickshaws. She argued that she was not present at the spot of seizure, …
Ashwani Kumar, owner of a restaurant, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act for the recovery of an empty liquor bottle from his premises. He argued that he was not present at the spot, had no conscious possession of the bottle, and was unaware that a …
Petitioner Parwati Devi applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 70 litres of liquor from a public area. The petitioner argued that she was not in possession of the liquor, the alleged recovery site was public, …
The petitioners, Shiv Shankar Singh and Arjun Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 272, 273, 308/34 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 (sections 30(a), 38(i), 41(i)). They contended that the liquor (129,600 litres) was recovered from a …
The petitioner, Subodh Manjhi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 35.7 litres of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the …
The petitioner, Akhilesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly having 100 litres of liquor recovered from his courtyard. He argued that the liquor was stored in a joint‑family house, that he had no …
Arvind Chaudhari applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor from a joint family house. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in his …
Amresh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 30 litres of liquor and a mobile phone were recovered from a motorcycle allegedly linked to him. He contended …
The petitioners, four individuals from Chehra Khurd village, filed a restoration application seeking to have Criminal Miscellaneous No. 67202 of 2025 reinstated to its original file. The State of Bihar opposed the application. The Hon'ble Justice Satyavrat Verma heard arguments from counsel for both …
The petitioners, Bablu Kumar and Satyendra Rai, were charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 170 litres of liquor and 1,000 litres of raw material from breweries near the Ganga river. They contended that they were not arrested at the spot, no …
The petitioner, Bhim Mandal, had earlier been granted anticipatory bail. He later applied to modify that bail order, alleging that the order was obtained by concealing his criminal antecedent. The State opposed the modification. The Court, adhering to a consistent view, held that an anticipatory …
Manish Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging recovery of 2,660.025 litres of liquor from a truck and charged under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B, as well as sections 30(a), 30(i)(ii) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the …
The petitioner, Suman Ram, filed a modification application seeking an extension of the surrender period prescribed in an anticipatory bail order. The court examined whether it could extend the surrender deadline when the petitioner had neither surrendered within the original period nor applied for …
The petitioner, Md Adib Alam, a supervisor with Tejas Rajdhani Coach, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging possession of 30.75 litres of liquor recovered from Rajendra Nagar Railway Station and related offences under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, the …
The petitioner, Dhiraj Kumar Singh, was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 2,395.5 litres of liquor from an abandoned house belonging to the late Maksudan Mahto. The petitioner was not arrested at the scene, no liquor was found in his …
The petitioner, Chandan Noniya, was arrested in connection with alleged illegal possession of 55.665 litres of liquor recovered from the house of Urmila Devi, invoking Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, that the recovery …
The petitioner, Gwari Nat, was charged under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 20 litres of liquor and 100 litres of Mahua solution, which were destroyed at the spot. He was not apprehended in possession of the liquor and was implicated by a watchman with whom …
The petitioner, Lalu Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 448.980 litres of liquor from a pick‑up vehicle he owned. He was not arrested at the spot and claimed that the liquor was not in his …
The petitioner, Pappu Singh, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, where 51.12 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a bag and a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no …
The petitioner, Jitendra Rai, was charged under Section 414 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly being involved in the recovery of 697.32 litres of liquor from a Bolero vehicle. He has seven prior cases, five under the Excise Act, and claims he was not arrested at the …
The petitioners, three villagers, were charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 120 litres of liquor from the bank of the Ganga River. They had prior excise cases but were not arrested at the spot and no liquor was found in their conscious …
The petitioner, Raghunath Sah, was implicated in the seizure of 842.760 litres of liquor from a Bolero pick‑up vehicle he owned, although he was not present at the spot and no liquor was found in his immediate possession. He argued that he was unaware of the vehicle’s misuse by another individual …
Madho Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 25 litres of liquor from a mango orchard. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, that the liquor was …
The petitioner, Deepak Sahani, was charged under IPC sections 272, 273 and 34 and several provisions of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 290 litres of liquor and 8,000 litres of raw material from a riverbank. He contended that he has a clean record, that the seized …
The petitioner, Raj Narayan Ram @ Dubey, was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 for allegedly recovering 36 litres of liquor from a public bridge. He was not arrested at the spot and no liquor was found in his possession; the case relied mainly on a …
The petitioners, three brothers from Muzaffarpur, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 concerning alleged recovery of liquor and Mahua Jaggery solution that was destroyed in a river. They argued that no …
The petitioner, Rajdeo Chaudhary, was arrested in connection with the seizure of 170 litres of liquor, an automobile and a motorcycle from a house that is part of a joint family property. He was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner pleaded that he has a clean …
The petitioner, Sunil Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition (No. 62673 of 2025) arising from a police case in East Champaran. He subsequently moved a restoration application seeking to have the petition reinstated in the court's original file. The learned counsel for the petitioner and the …
Shri Krishna Mahto applied for bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022. He has seven prior cases, one involving alleged recovery of 494.64 litres of liquor from a co‑accused’s straw house, but he was not arrested at the scene and no …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, had been granted anticipatory bail on 11-12-2025 with the condition that his father, Ram Kumar Mandal, act as one of the bailors. The petitioner later applied to modify this condition, claiming his father lacked property to furnish the required surety and requesting …
Chunchun Chaudhary was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 12 litres of liquor from a house that is a joint family property. The petitioner argued that he was not in conscious possession, the liquor was not seized from him, and that the concept of deemed possession had been abolished …
Santosh Mahto applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging recovery of 55 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He argued that he was not caught in possession and that the investigation was mechanically …
The petitioner, Ankit Singh, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 623.88 litres of liquor from a Scorpio and a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, did not have …
The petitioner, Aditya Anand, was implicated in a criminal miscellaneous case (PS Case No. 354 of 2024) in Saharsa district. He filed a regular bail application before the High Court of Patna. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the bail application, requesting …
The petition filed by Jhariya Devi sought anticipatory bail after she feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging recovery of 18 litres of liquor and 7 kg of Mahua flowers from a hut near a government school. The petitioner argued that she was …
The petitioners, Bijay Yadav and Basant Yadav, filed a modification application seeking an extension of the surrender period granted under anticipatory bail. The State of Bihar opposed the application. Justice Satyavrat Verma observed that the court consistently refuses to extend the surrender …
The petitioner, Dhanu Mahto, applied for bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022. He has three prior cases, one involving alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house, but no liquor was found in his …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 33, 35, 36 and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging that liquor was recovered from premises not belonging to him and that he was not caught in possession. He …
The petitioner, Ravi Kumar, was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 180 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, an offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and did not have conscious …
The petitioner, Raja Kumar, filed a restoration application for Criminal Miscellaneous No. 75277 of 2025, which had been previously dismissed. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Shashi Kant, while the State of Bihar was represented by Mr. Rajendra Singh. The court examined the grounds presented …
The petitioner, Chhotu Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 55 litres of liquor from a public pond. The petitioner claimed a clean antecedent and argued that the alleged liquor was not in his possession and …
The petitioner, Vikash Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 59,400 litres of liquor and seizure of a motorcycle from land not owned by him. He argued that nothing was found in his …
The petitioner, Lav Kush, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 82 litres of liquor and seizure of a motorcycle. The petitioner argued that he was not in …
The petitioner, Sushil Kumar Manjhi, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a), 36, 38 and 41 of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 621.120 litres of liquor from a Tata Sumo vehicle. He has two prior criminal cases and was not arrested at the spot, nor was any …
Petitioner Baban Singh applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with alleged offences under IPC Sections 414, 272, 273 and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act involving the seizure of 3,780.72 litres of liquor from a truck and a car he owned. He argued that he had a …
The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from a house that is part of a joint family property. He sought bail under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, arguing that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession …
The petitioner, Vikash Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition (No. 6867 of 2026) arising from a 2018 police case. The petition sought restoration of another criminal miscellaneous case (No. 70103 of 2025) which had been removed from the court’s file. The State opposed the restoration and …
The petitioners, Sonu Jha and Sudhir Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving alleged possession of 200 ml of liquor, 500 ml of beer, and three empty cartridges. The allegations were based on confessional statements made by co-accused persons while in police …
Vikash Kumar was accused of an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, involving alleged recovery of 600 litres of liquor near the Ganga River. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no possession of the liquor, and was implicated …
The petitioner, Dinesh Chaudhry, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 14 litres of liquor, four of which were said to be from his joint‑family house. He contended that he …
The petitioner, Sanoj Manjhi, applied for bail in a criminal case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging recovery of 30 litres of liquor from a location not belonging to him. The petitioner disclosed five prior cases, four of which were also under the …
The petitioner, Chhote Mahto, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 432 litres of liquor from the Bagmati River. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, …
The petitioner, Chawkalet Nut, was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 270 litres of liquor from a bush behind a co-accused's hut. He was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the alleged recovery occurred on land …
The petitioner, Nantun Mukhiya, applied for anticipatory bail in a criminal case. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. He then sought permission from the court to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The court, after hearing counsel, granted the request to …
Petitioner Prabhawati Kunwar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging that liquor was recovered from a public pond near her house and not from her possession. She has five prior cases …
The petitioner, Sazzad Ali Guddu, sought anticipatory bail in a case alleging recovery of 81 litres of liquor from three motorcycles, invoking Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no liquor in …
The petitioner, Indrajeet Ray, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 1,840 litres of liquor from a pickup vehicle. He argued that he was not in …
The petitioner, Sunil Kumar Yadav, was arrested in connection with an alleged recovery of 324 litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard, an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. He had a prior case and was in custody since 18-12-2025, but the alleged liquor was not …
The petitioner, Ravi Ranjan Kumar, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 82 litres of liquor from a premises belonging to Dashrath Bhuiyan, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018/2022. He contended that the liquor was not found in his …
Petitioner Shri Prakash Mandal applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with offences under the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act (Sections 336(3), 274, 275, 3(5)) and the Excise Act (Sections 30(a) and 41(i)). He contended that he was not in …
Ganesh Rai was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 25.5 litres of liquor from a motorcycle and charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022. The petitioner argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and was implicated …
The petitioners, Anil Kumar Ray and Sudhir Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act involving the recovery of 4,942.080 litres of liquor from a truck. They argued that they were not …
Vishwanath Ray was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 947.475 litres of liquor, alleged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022. The petitioner argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and that the liquor was not found in his …
The petitioners, Jai Prasad Rai and Kanti Devi, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 103 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, where an informant alleged that the accused had murdered his aunt on 17‑09‑2024. The petitioners argued that they have clean antecedents and …
The petitioner, Chiku Chaudhary, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 5,637.880 litres of liquor from a truck. He was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and he is not the owner of the vehicle; the …
The petitioner, Sujeet Yadav, was convicted in a criminal case and subsequently filed a regular bail application. The petitioner later sought the court's permission to withdraw this bail application. The learned counsel for the petitioner argued that withdrawal was permissible despite the …
The petitioner, Umesh Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving the seizure of large quantities of liquor from his truck and a car, under several provisions of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was unaware of …
Vikrant Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he was likely to be arrested in a case under Section 37 of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 and several provisions of the Arms Act. The incident involved firing in Madhuban Colony, where a co‑accused, Munna Kumar, …
Gore Lal Singh (also known as Gore Lal Sharma) applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He argued that the FIR specifically implicates another accused, Umesh Singh, and that no direct allegation of assault is made …
Petitioner Bala Nut filed an anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Procedure Code. While the application was pending, he was apprehended by the police. The petitioner then sought permission from the court to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The learned counsel for the State …
The petitioner, Golu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under IPC Section 414 and Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018 Section 30(a) concerning alleged recovery of large quantities of liquor from his vehicle and a mango orchard. He argued that the liquor was not in his …
The petitioner, Ranjeet Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 65 litres of liquor from a hut not belonging to him. He asserted a clean criminal record and that the liquor was …
Ram Naresh Ray was charged under Sections 30(a), 41(1) and 41(2) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 2,656.8 litres of liquor from a truck and a Bolero vehicle. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was merely the owner …
Petitioner Ray Kumar was granted regular bail on 30-01-2026 with the condition that his father, Balmiki Yadav, act as a bailor. The father is also an accused in the same case, rendering him ineligible to be a bailor. The petitioner’s counsel requested that the brother‑in‑law, Sushil Kumar, be …
The petitioner, Raju Kumar Chaudhary, was charged under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 27 litres of liquor and destroying 35 litres of semi‑manufactured liquor. He was not arrested at the spot and no liquor was found in his possession; his name appeared only in …
The petitioner, Chandan Mahto, was charged under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor and 2000 litres of mahua pass, though the seizure occurred at a location not owned by him and no contraband was found in his possession. He had been in judicial custody since …
The petitioner, Saral Rai, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that no liquor was recovered from his possession and that the alleged seizure occurred at a public riverbank. He argued that the police had mechanically …
Alab, the petitioner, filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking anticipatory bail in a criminal case arising from PS Palasi, Araria. During the hearing, the senior counsel for the petitioner expressed difficulty in continuing the proceedings and requested permission to withdraw the …
The petitioners, a group of Yadav individuals from Sarro village, filed a restoration application before the Patna High Court seeking to have Criminal Miscellaneous No. 76519 of 2025 reinstated to its original file. The State of Bihar opposed the application. The court examined the grounds presented …
The petitioner, Sikendar Ram, was implicated in a case involving the seizure of 729 litres of liquor from four motorcycles, alleged under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing …
Uma Shanker Pandey, the petitioner, had been granted anticipatory bail with a condition to surrender within a specified period. He failed to surrender within that time and subsequently filed an application seeking modification to extend the surrender period. The State opposed the application. The …
Petitioner Rana Sukanta Kundu, a resident of West Bengal, feared arrest in a case registered under several IPC sections and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of spirits, alum and liquor from the houses of seven accused. No liquor or alum was seized from his premises; the …
The petitioner, Raman Mahto, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 417.600 litres of liquor from a Bolero vehicle, under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the BNS read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was not apprehended at the spot, the liquor was not …
The petitioner, Sanjay Dhangar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that 45 litres of liquor were recovered from three locations, only 26 litres allegedly from his house, which is joint family property. He contended that he …
Vishal Raj, the petitioner, faced arrest in a case involving alleged seizure of 2,240.28 litres of liquor from four vehicles, with charges under IPC sections 272, 273 and 120(B) and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018. He contended that he had no conscious possession of the …
The petitioner, Arvind Sahani, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging recovery of 97.66 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, did not …
The petitioner, Bogi Ram, applied for anticipatory bail after fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor. He argued he has a clean antecedent, the alleged liquor was not in his possession, and the FIR omitted the …
Vishal Kumar Chaudhary was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor and seizure of a motorcycle, charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and that the case against …
Manish Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, involving the alleged recovery of 707.280 litres of liquor from a Scorpio. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious …
The petitioner, Rupesh Kumar, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 703.125 litres of liquor from a washroom near Baba Badal Chaudhary Sthan, an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was not apprehended at the spot, had no conscious possession of …
The petitioner, Gopal Yadav, a government servant with the Indian Railways, was arrested in connection with a property‑related dispute that allegedly led to a shooting injuring the informant's son. He faces multiple serious offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 324(4), 109, …
Manoj Kumar filed a restoration application seeking to have Criminal Miscellaneous No.49456 of 2025 restored to its original file. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Arun Kumar and the State by Mr. Ahmad Ali. The court examined the grounds raised in the restoration application. Finding the …
Petitioner Parwati Devi sought anticipatory bail after learning that she might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 15 litres of liquor recovered from a joint family house. She argued that the liquor was not in her conscious …
The petitioner, Srikant Rai, was charged under Sections 414 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 330 litres of illicit liquor and two seized motorcycles at a joint family house. He has eight prior criminal cases, five under the excise …
Petitioner Mohammad Hafiz, owner of a Bolero vehicle from which 210 litres of liquor was seized, applied for anticipatory bail under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was unaware of its misuse by a driver, and that ownership of the vehicle …
The petitioner, Rakesh Ram, was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 60 litres of liquor from a canal area in Nipaniya village. He has three prior excise cases and has been in custody since 23 October 2025. The petitioner argued that he was not apprehended at …
Manish Kumar and Anil Prasad were granted anticipatory bail by the Patna High Court with a condition to surrender within a specified period. They failed to surrender within that time and did not file an application seeking modification before the deadline expired. The petitioners filed a …
The petitioner, Pratik Kumar, was charged under IPC sections 468, 471, 420, 414 and 34, and Bihar Excise Act sections 30(a), 32, 36 and 41 for allegedly recovering 5,951.8 liters of liquor from five vehicles. He contended that he was not apprehended at the scene, had no possession of the liquor, and …
The petitioner, Gaurav Kumar Singh, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 167.25 litres of liquor from an agricultural field, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He has four prior cases, three under the excise law, but was acquitted in one. The petitioner argued that he …
Petitioner Raviranjan Ray sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under IPC sections 272, 273 and 34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that liquor was seized from a vehicle not owned by him and that his mobile number was used by a friend to commit the …
The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 182.250 liters of liquor from a cattle shed on his premises, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He applied for bail, asserting a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not found in his conscious …
