Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
5892 judgments · newest first · showing 4201–4400
The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case involving alleged illegal liquor possession under IPC sections 272 and 273 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act sections 30(a), 41 and 47. He argued that the charge sheet contained a clerical …
The petitioner, Chhotu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging that the alleged seizure of 455 litres of spirit was from land not belonging to him and that he had no conscious possession. He …
Manish Chaudhary applied for bail in a criminal case (Criminal Miscellaneous No.1546 of 2026) concerning alleged offences under Sections 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the Bihar Narcotic/Excise Statute, 2023, read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, for the alleged recovery of 1,528.200 litres of …
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar Choudhary, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 1528.200 liters of liquor from a truck and charged under Sections 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, together with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he …
The petitioner, Sohan Choudhary, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 1,528.200 liters of liquor from a truck, charged under Sections 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had no prior …
The petitioners, four individuals from Pachoi village, were granted anticipatory bail by the Patna High Court with a condition to surrender by a specified date. They later filed a modification application seeking an extension of the surrender period. The State opposed the application, arguing that …
The petitioner, Jitendra Rai, was charged under IPC sections 272, 273, 414 and 34 and several provisions of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 6,168.6 litres of liquor from three vehicles. He contended that he was not caught in the act, no liquor was found in his possession, and that the …
The petitioner, Sunny Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor from his hotel and a toddy shop. He argued that no liquor was seized from his possession and that the case was based solely on a …
Shashi Bhushan Singh applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 750 ml of liquor was recovered from a guardroom in DRCC premises. The allegation is based solely on a …
Petitioner Sujit Kumar Yadav sought anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a), 37 and 47 of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor from a house and a motorcycle not owned by him. He argued that he had no possession of the liquor, no …
Petitioner Prince Kumar Chauhan applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. The petitioner claimed he was not in possession of the …
The petitioner, Gautam Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 2 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession …
The petitioner, Ajit Singh, was implicated in an excise case (PS Case No.1272 of 2025) for alleged possession of 300 ml of liquor in a vehicle he owned, alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession …
Petitioner Baiju Sah sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act alleging that 47.07 litres of liquor were recovered from his jointly‑owned house. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious …
The petitioner, Bhutta Sahni, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 80 litres of liquor and a motorcycle were seized. He argued he has a clean antecedent, the seized items were not in his possession, and …
Sudhir Sahni applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 80 litres of liquor from a motorcycle that was not in his possession. The petitioner argued that the police had mechanically …
The petitioner, Sanjay Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 126 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, the seized vehicle was not his, and the case was based solely on …
The petitioner, Zeba Naaz, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for the alleged recovery of 171 litres of liquor from a vehicle she owned. She argued that she had a clean antecedent, was unaware of her …
Petitioners Pramod Yadav and Ganawa Yadav sought anticipatory bail after learning that they might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 200 litres of liquor and 200 litres of jawa mahua from a forest area. They argued they have no prior criminal …
Mohit Lather applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under the Excise Act alleging recovery of 204 litres of liquor from his vehicle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware of any …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 17.250 litres of liquor recovered from an auto. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no …
The petitioner, Md. Tauheed Parwez Alam, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for allegedly possessing 8.25 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean …
The petitioners, three women residing in Saidnagar, Darbhanga, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 134.40 litres of liquor from a hut adjacent to their house. They contended that no liquor …
The petitioner, Chhotak Bind, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 14 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in his conscious possession, …
Petitioner Kamlesh Bind applied for anticipatory bail under the Criminal Procedure Code. While the application was pending, he was arrested. The petitioner’s counsel sought the court’s permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court granted the request, holding that a party may …
Lalaram, the owner of a vehicle rented to Zoom Car Service, was implicated in the recovery of 285.495 litres of liquor from his car and faced charges under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that …
The petitioner, Sumit Kumar Mishra, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 23.58 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicles, and was implicated solely on a …
The petitioner, Srikant Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(c) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 28 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, that the motorcycles were his …
The petitioners, Amar Paswan and Rohit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 50 litres of liquor from the bank of the Gandak River. They argued they have a clean antecedent, were not caught in …
Kiran Devi was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 110 litres of liquor from a house that is part of a joint family property. She contended that she had no direct possession of the liquor, had a clean antecedent, and that the FIR did not …
The petitioner, Shambhu Mahto, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 647.82 litres of liquor from a tractor. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the seized liquor, and was …
The petitioner, Birendra Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly having 104 litres of liquor seized from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and that the vehicle …
The petitioner, Raushan Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 200 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not the owner of the seized vehicle, and that his name does not appear in the FIR, …
Mahendra Ram applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Excise Act, where 150,400 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from an e‑rickshaw owned by him. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, …
Dashrath Yadav applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the scene, that the liquor was recovered from …
The petitioner, Sunil Kumar Rai, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, where 20 litres of liquor were recovered from a scooty he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested …
The petitioner, Rajesh Kumar Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for the alleged recovery of 16,500 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of …
The petitioner, Sarita Devi, was granted provisional anticipatory bail by the Patna High Court on 29-01-2026. However, the order inadvertently omitted a direction for the trial court to verify her criminal antecedents. The petitioner’s counsel highlighted this omission, prompting the Court to insert …
The petitioner, Harendra Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was recovered from a place not belonging to him, and that no liquor was …
Vishnu Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and Sections 318(4) and 317(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, alleging recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a scooty. He contended that he was not in …
The petitioner, Anil Rai, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 300 litres of liquor from the bank of the Punpun River. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting a clean criminal record and arguing that the alleged recovery …
Mukesh Kumar sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of liquor from premises adjacent to his house. He argued he had no possession of the liquor and possessed a clean criminal record. The State opposed the bail. The …
The petitioner, Md. Wasim Ansari, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 0.375 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, had a clean antecedent, and was …
The petitioner, Md. Ujale, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 35.7 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession and that he was unaware that a friend had used the vehicle …
Petitioner Rajesh Manjhi sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case involving alleged recovery of 240.87 litres of liquor from an auto, with charges under Sections 318(4), 303(2), 317(5) and 61(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar …
The petitioner, Jageshwar Kumar Singh, was implicated in a case (Kadwa PS Case No. 300 of 2025) for allegedly possessing 70 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and was unaware that his friend misused the …
The petitioner, Ram Pukar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic and Smuggling (BNS) Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that the liquor was recovered from a motorcycle not in his possession and …
The petitioner, Nandi Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 18 litres of liquor from two premises, one being a joint family house. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the …
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 7.5 litres of liquor near a Durga temple. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession, the alleged recovery occurred on public land, and the case was based solely on a …
The petitioners, four residents of Nawalpur, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 129,600 litres of liquor from a sugarcane field not owned by them. They argued they had clean antecedents (except one …
Petitioner Rajan Mukhiya sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 129.6 litres of liquor from a sack near a bamboo orchard, which was not in his possession. The petitioner argued that the alleged recovery occurred on …
Resma, Asmira and Fida Hussain filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners sought permission to withdraw the application. The court considered the request and, recognizing the petitioners' difficulty, …
The petitioners, Abhishek Kumar and Subash Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from a bush. They argued that no liquor was found in their possession, the alleged recovery …
The petitioners, four brothers, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 830 litres of liquor from two locations. They contended that the liquor was not in their conscious possession, the recovery site did …
The petitioner, Ramesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 210.6 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from four vehicles. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no possession …
The petitioner, Satrughan Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, concerning the alleged recovery of 10.6 litres of liquor from a public crossing. He …
The petitioner, Amitabh Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, relating to alleged recovery of 4,428.72 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not caught in possession and that the …
The petitioner, Jay Prakash Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 180 litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the location did not belong to him, and the …
Baljit Chaudhary sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 47A and F of the Bihar Excise Act, 1915, read with Section 98(2)(3)(4) and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018, alleging recovery of liquor from his house. He argued that the liquor …
The petitioner, Sachin Kumar, filed an application for anticipatory bail under the Criminal Procedure Code before the Patna High Court. During the hearing on 29 January 2026, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court, after hearing the …
The petitioner, Saroj Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner's counsel subsequently sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court, after …
Kundan Kumar, the owner of a vehicle from which 1.95 litres of liquor was recovered, was charged under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He applied for anticipatory bail, contending that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in his car and that he …
Petitioner Nikesh Kumar Yadav applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under the Excise Act alleging recovery of 180 litres of liquor from three vehicles. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no possession of …
The petitioner, Vinda Rai, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 32(3) and 33 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 180 litres of liquor from three vehicles. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and that the liquor was not …
The petitioner, Jai Narayan Thakur, was implicated in an excise case for the alleged recovery of 180 litres of liquor from three vehicles, alleged to violate Sections 30(a), 32(3) and 33 of the Bihar Excise Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting that he has a clean antecedent and that he …
The petitioners, Bulat Yadav and Ramesh Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 13.5 litres of liquor from a public place. They argued that they were not arrested on the spot, did not have conscious …
The petitioner, Sikandar Mahto, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging that no liquor was recovered from his possession and that the prosecution’s case relied solely on a confessional statement made by another person …
The petitioner, Krishna Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application in the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner then sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court granted permission to withdraw, holding that …
The petitioner, Sonam Kumari, was granted provisional anticipatory bail on 29‑01‑2026. However, the order failed to include a direction for the trial court to verify her criminal antecedent. The petitioner’s counsel sought amendment, arguing that without such verification the bail could be …
Mukesh Kumar, the owner of a vehicle from which 625.86 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he was not present at the spot, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and he was unaware that his driver …
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 4.5 litres of liquor from a paper‑plate factory. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession, the alleged recovery occurred on premises not owned by …
The petitioner, Santosh Rai, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging recovery of 227.5 litres of liquor from a vehicle, with charges under IPC Sections 272, 273 and 34 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not the …
The petitioner, Vijay Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where liquor was allegedly recovered from locations adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession and …
The petitioners, Upendra Rai and Murari Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of liquor from a brick kiln. They applied for anticipatory bail, asserting clean antecedents and that the alleged recovery was not from their possession. The …
The petitioner, Suresh Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 100 litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house. He contended that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, that the house is jointly owned, …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 100 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not the owner of the vehicle, no liquor was found in his possession, and the case was based solely on a confessional …
Shabana Khatoon, the owner of a scooter and a motorcycle, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 20.46 litres of liquor from her vehicles. She contended that she was not in possession of the liquor, had no knowledge of its misuse by others, …
Rampravesh Sahni applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of 30 litres of liquor from a forest area. The petitioner asserted a clean criminal record and argued that no liquor was …
The petitioner, Sujeet Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 200 litres of spirit from two vehicles and a house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not in …
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case alleging that 1,827 litres of liquor were recovered from a truck he was allegedly involved in transporting puffed rice. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not the owner of the truck, and had no knowledge of the …
The petitioner, Goutam Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 21 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at …
The petitioners, Ajit Kumar and Vijay Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after learning that they might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging the recovery of 72 litres of liquor from a motorcycle and a scooty. They contended …
The petitioners, a group of six individuals, filed Criminal Miscellaneous No.4201 of 2026 arising from a 2020 police case in Patna. No counsel appeared on their behalf, while the State of Bihar was represented by Advocate Jharkhandi Upadhyay. The matter was listed before Justice Satyavrat Verma. …
Madho Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 46 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle. He argued he was not in possession of the vehicle and was implicated solely on a confessional statement of another accused, which he …
The petitioners, Chandan Kumar Singh and Kundan Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 151.68 litres of liquor. They argued they had no possession of the liquor, the recovery site did not belong to …
The petitioner, Shanti Devi, sought anticipatory bail after a police case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleged that 15 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle she owned. She argued that she had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle and that she was not in …
The petitioners, Ful Kumari Devi and Nageshwar Chaudhari, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case alleging offences under Sections 30(a), (b) and (c) of the Excise Act for possession of liquor recovered from a joint family house. They …
The petitioners, Anil and Babulal Hembrum, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of 40 litres of liquor from their joint family house. They argued …
Krishna Kumar was implicated in an excise case for the alleged recovery of 1.250 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and that his brother had misused the vehicle without his knowledge. The State opposed his …
The petitioner, Jay Kumar, was implicated in a case (PS Case No. 127 of 2022) for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act involving the recovery of 45 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor …
Guddu Kumar Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 8.25 litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the …
The petitioners, Rohit and Rahul Kumar, were accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of large quantities of liquor recovered from a joint family house. They argued they had no conscious possession, the property was jointly owned, and the amendment of 2018 had …
The petitioner, Vinod Raman, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly concealing 16,500 litres of liquor in a pit at a temporary fodder hut that does not belong to him. He has three prior excise cases and was not arrested at the spot, leading him to seek …
Petitioner Ratnesh Singh sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 36 of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of 1,364.250 litres of liquor from a truck. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and was implicated solely on …
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 36 of the Bihar Excise Act involving alleged recovery of 1,364.250 litres of liquor from a truck. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the vehicle owner, and was implicated …
Madan Sahani applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging recovery of 25 litres of liquor from his motorcycle, charging him under IPC sections 272 and 273 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in …
The petitioners, a group of seven individuals from Hamidpur, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging possession of ten litres of liquor by Balindra Paswan. …
Laxman Prasad Paswan filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court seeking relief against the State of Bihar. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated notices. The State's counsel, Nand Kumar, was present and informed the court that the petition was …
Ranjan Kumar Kamat was charged with kidnapping, kidnapping for marriage, and related offences under the IPC and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, which was rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge. Kamat appealed (Cr. Appeal SJ …
Ranjan Kumar Kamat was charged with kidnapping, forced marriage and related offences under several IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, which was rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge. Kamat appealed (Cr. Appeal SJ No.1731) arguing that the …
The appellant, Ravi Kumar, was charged with multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in a case arising from an alleged assault and robbery on 06.01.2024. He applied for anticipatory bail, which was denied by the 1st …
Chhotu Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous petition against the State of Bihar. No counsel appeared for the petitioner, while the State was represented by A.P.P. Parmanand Prasad. The State argued that the petition was taken up on 11 September 2024 and the petitioner was given two weeks to rectify …
The appellants – six individuals named Manish Kumar, Ramesh Ray, Munna Kumar, Pintu Kumar, Rohit Ray and Sipahi Ray – filed Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.3385 of 2025 before the Patna High Court arising from Police Station Janta Bazar case No.120 of 2025. While the appeal was pending, all the appellants …
The appellants, Salimul Haque and Md Ashif Nasim, were charged under several provisions of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act, 2023 and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for allegedly assaulting the husband of the informant and using caste-based slurs. …
The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (Goraul PS Case No. 436 of 2025) involving alleged kidnapping, robbery, sexual assault, blackmail, and extortion, with charges under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Sections 66A …
Ghanshyam Mandal applied for anticipatory bail in a criminal case (Palasi P.S. Case No. 368 of 2025). After hearing, he requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead surrender to obtain regular bail. The Patna High Court granted the request, dismissed the …
The petitioner, Dhallu Mandal, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged possession of 30 litres of liquor. He argued that the case diary had not been produced, he had a clean antecedent, and the liquor was found in a joint‑family house, …
The petitioner, Mohit Kumar Chaudhary, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, and applied for anticipatory bail. He argued that the police had not yet submitted the required report from the Superintendent of Police, and that no liquor was recovered …
Bambam Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 30(a), 32(1), 32(3), 41(1) and 42(2) of the Excise Act relating to the recovery of 2,358.720 litres of liquor from four vehicles. The petitioner argued that …
Shukumar Paswan was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. His counsel, Mr. Amarnath Jha, requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application after the arrest. The State, represented by Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha, opposed the withdrawal. …
The petition filed by Krishnawati Devi, mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 80, 238 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic/Criminal Statutes, 2023, alleging dowry‑related torture and death. The informant alleged that the victim was married on 7 …
The petitioners, Veena Devi and Puja Devi, women with clean antecedents, were implicated in a case alleging assault under various sections of the BNS. They contended that the allegations against them were vague and that the real perpetrators were male family members, including Subhash and Tinku, who …
The petitioners, Sarjun Yadav and Rakesh Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 300 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. The petitioners argued that …
The petitioner, Digvijay Narayan Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of nine litres of liquor thrown outside his house. He argued that the case diary had not been produced despite being called for, that he had not …
The petitioner, Dhiraj Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 105 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, alleging that he was falsely implicated in the death of his wife. He contended that the marriage had lasted 13 years, produced two …
Parasnath Singh applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging assault with an iron rod, sword and lathi, resulting in injuries to an informant and his relatives. The petitioner claimed a clean antecedent and argued that the informant's injury was simple and the allegations …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 25 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and that his friend, who fled the scene, …
The petitioner, Sudhir Sahni, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 30, 38(i), 38(ii) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 6.375 litres of liquor recovered from a kiosk not owned by him. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, …
Petitioner Pramila Devi, the owner of a vehicle in which 144.750 litres of liquor were seized, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC for alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Excise Act. She argued that she was not present at the spot of seizure, had no …
The petitioner, Sanjay Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 14,400 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, the liquor was not …
The petitioner, Mannu @ Abhimanyu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He has five prior criminal cases, four relating to excise, and contends that his implication is based solely on a …
The petitioner, Dipu Sahni, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 105 litres of liquor from a bush adjacent to his house. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not apprehended at the spot, and no liquor was found in his possession. …
Amarjeet Ram and Shambhu Ram were implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor from their residences, which are part of a joint family property. The petitioners, who have no prior criminal record, argued that the liquor was not in their …
Vishwamitra Singh applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case alleging the recovery of 103.68 litres of liquor and a motorcycle under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the …
The petitioner, Rakesh Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Non‑Commercial Sale Act and Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that no liquor was recovered from his possession and that the alleged recovery …
Munna Yadav applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 93 litres of liquor from his auto. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of …
The petitioner, Md. Afroz Ansari, feared arrest in a case alleging the recovery of 2,615.760 liters of liquor from a Hyva truck and a pickup vehicle, offences charged under Sections 318(4), 317(5), 61(2) of the Bihar Narcotic/Excise Statutes (BNS) 2023 and Sections 30(a), 32(ii)(iii), 41(i)(ii) of …
The petitioner, Arvind Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 243 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He contended that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the seized vehicle, and that the …
Sabita Devi applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case arising from a police raid where a mob assaulted officers. She argued she has a clean antecedent, was not named in the FIR, and was only present at the scene out of curiosity. The State opposed the bail, citing the serious …
The petitioner, Siyaram Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 32(3) and 56(b) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act relating to the alleged recovery of liquor from a godown and two vehicles. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor and …
Meena Devi, a resident of East Champaran, applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 13 litres of liquor from her house. She argued that she was not in actual possession, the house is joint family property, and …
The petitioner, Krishna Choudhary, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 31 litres of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the alleged liquor …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 43.5 litres of liquor from a motorcycle and a hut. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and is not the owner of the seized …
The petitioner, Navin Kumar Nisant, was implicated in the alleged recovery of 291.960 litres of liquor from two cars under Sections 30(a) and 32(ii) of the Excise Act. He was not arrested at the scene, no liquor was found in his possession, and the allegation rests on a confessional statement of …
The petitioner, Jhuna Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 alleging recovery of 414.72 litres of liquor from a location near the Soti River. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at …
The petitioner, Subodh Sao, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 750 ml of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, and was implicated …
The petitioner, Laxman Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in an excise case alleging recovery of 40.860 litres of liquor from Vina Devi's premises. The allegation was based solely on a confession made by Vina Devi while in police custody, with no material seized from the …
The petitioner, Anjay Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 30(a) of the Indian Penal Code. An order granting anticipatory bail was issued on 28‑01‑2026, but it incorrectly recorded his village as “Bhagwanpur Bhuski” instead of the correct “Bhagwatpur Bhuski”. The petitioner’s counsel …
The petitioner, Chandrashekhar Paswan, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of ten litres of liquor from a field not belonging to him. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor …
The petitioner, Sunil Prajapati, was implicated in a case concerning the seizure of 86.355 litres of liquor from a Maruti Dzire vehicle he owned, under Sections 30(a), 32(1)&(3) and 41(1)&(2) of the Bihar Excise Act. He claimed he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle and maintained a …
The petitioner, Chandan Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a)(b)(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of liquor and Jawa Mahua from a riverbank. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found …
The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar, was implicated in an excise case for alleged recovery of 70 litres of liquor and 300 litres of fermented Jawa Mahua from a motorcycle he owned, though nothing was found in his conscious possession. He claimed a clean antecedent and asserted that he was unaware of any …
The petitioner, Devwrat Ray, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 41 and 56 of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 180 litres of liquor from an auto. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, and was only the owner …
The petitioner, Ravan Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 832 litres of spirit from his dalan. He argued that the alleged seizure was not from his immediate possession, the dalan …
The petitioner, Ritesh Kumar, was implicated in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 4.8 litres of liquor and the seizure of a motorcycle used by a co‑accused, Rahul. The petitioner, who owned the vehicle but was not in possession at the time of the incident, sought …
Petitioner Pappu Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal miscellaneous case. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court, after hearing counsel for both sides, granted the …
The petitioner, Lalu Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He alleged that the alleged 31 litres of liquor and a seized motorcycle were recovered from a location …
The petitioners, Ramdahin Yadav and Surendra Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor and Jawa Mahua. They argued that the alleged seizure was not from their possession and that the police had …
The petitioner, Lallu Mushahar, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 20 litres of liquor from a sack near his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location did not belong to him, and the …
Pappu Mukhiya applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging that the alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor was from a public place and that he was not arrested or found in possession of the liquor. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Bipin Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 432 litres of liquor from an auto. He contended that he was not the owner of the vehicle, nothing was seized from his possession, and his …
The petitioner, Upendra Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 360 litres of liquor from a public area near the Gandak river. He argued that he was not arrested, no liquor was found in his possession, and the location does not belong to …
The petitioner, Pinkesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 44.49 litres of liquor from a bush near Ranveer Jha's house. He argued that he had no possession of the liquor, no …
Shamvati Devi, the wife of Naresh Nut, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of ten litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned. She argued that she had a clean antecedent, was not present at the spot, and had …
The petitioner, Sujit Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 555 ml of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, and was unaware that another …
Ashok Kumar Sah applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 120 litres of liquor from three motorcycles. The petitioner argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not arrested at the scene, …
The petitioner, Gaurav Kumar Kejriwal, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 32(3) and 37 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 0.650 litres of liquor in his vehicle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the liquor, …
The petitioner, Rohit Gupta, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor and mahua. He argued that the liquor was recovered from a joint family …
The petitioners, Rajendra Tanti and his son Suman Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Sections 30(a), 32(3) and 45 of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 180 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, a toto …
The petitioner, Subodh Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of liquor, a motorcycle and jawa mahua. He contended that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the seized vehicle and was implicated only through a …
Sudhir Gupta was implicated in a case under Section 47(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018 for allegedly possessing 10 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. The petitioner argued that he had no conscious possession, that the liquor could not be …
The petitioner, Nitesh Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 25.92 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in his …
The petitioner, Kanti Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act involving the seizure of large quantities of liquor from vehicles she owned. She argued she had no conscious possession of the liquor and was unaware that a …
Sudhir Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 102.6 litres of liquor from an e‑rickshaw. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not the owner of the …
The petitioner, Kamta Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 75 litres of liquor and a motorcycle. He asserted a clean criminal record and argued that the seized vehicle and liquor were not in his possession, …
The petitioner, Ranjan Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 82.5 litres of liquor, of which 22.5 litres were said to be from his premises. He argued that the liquor was found in an open area (palani) accessible to villagers and that …
Petitioner Rajendra Chaudhary sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 37 litres of liquor from a neighbour's paddy field and 1910 litres of semi‑manufactured liquor from land adjacent to his house, which was …
Manoj Kumar Singh applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 alleging that 83.07 litres of liquor were recovered from his Mahindra XUV‑500. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, …
The petitioner, Fulwa Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act, where police alleged recovery of liquor and Mahua jaggery solution from her residence, a joint family property. She contended that she did not have conscious …
The petitioner, Ranjay Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 85 litres of liquor and 1,000 litres of fermented Jawa Mahua solution. He argued that he has a clean …
Deewan Kumar sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 alleging he was involved in the recovery of 85 litres of liquor and 1,000 litres of fermented Jawa Mahua solution. The petitioner argued that he was …
Gautam Kumar, the owner of a motorcycle from which 39.375 litres of liquor was recovered, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with offences under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not …
The petitioner, Bablu Singh, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 6.84 litres of liquor from a public bush. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the allegation stemmed …
The petitioner, Dhanesh Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 7 litres of liquor. He argued that the liquor was located in a joint‑family house, he had no conscious possession, and …
The Patna High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Deepak Kumar, who was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. The petitioner contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar Rai, owner of a truck, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 836.79 litres of liquor from his vehicle. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that he had no prior criminal record, was not arrested at the scene, and …
The petitioner, Anil Sonkar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor from an e‑rickshaw he owned. He argued that he was not present at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, …
Shanichri Devi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 16,400 litres of liquor from a hut adjacent to her house. She argued she had no possession of the liquor, the hut did not belong to her, and she had a clean …
Anil Kumar, the petitioner, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case (PS Alamganj Case No. 845 of 2022) alleging that 540 ml of liquor was recovered from his scooter, invoking Sections 30(a), 36 and 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that he was not arrested at …
Mahendra Mukhiya applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with offences under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. He argued that the alleged liquor was recovered from a public canal, not …
The appellants, Lalit Kumar and Jitendra Kumar, were charged under several IPC sections and the SC/ST Act for allegedly demolishing a hut, looting property, and threatening a woman with caste-based abuse in a land dispute. They sought anticipatory bail, which was denied by the Special Judge, …
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 9.7 litres of liquor near the dalan of Rajunandan. He contended he had no prior criminal record and that the liquor was not found in his possession, the …
The petitioner, Bittu Kumar Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 7,555.68 litres of liquor. The petitioner claimed a clean antecedent and argued that …
The petitioner, Rajiv Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 171 litres of liquor from a hut not owned by him. He asserted a clean criminal record and no direct possession or relationship with …
The petitioner, Bideshi Rai (Ravindra Kumar Yadav), sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 237 litres of concealed liquor. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession, the recovery …
The petitioner, Gouri Shankar Ray, was implicated in an excise case (Case No. 780 of 2023) for the alleged recovery of 6,600 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He was not arrested at the spot and claimed he was unaware that the vehicle would be used for the alleged offence. The petitioner …
The petitioners, Mina Devi and Vicky Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging that no liquor was found in their possession and the recovery was from a location unrelated to them. They argued that the …
The Patna High Court entertained an application for anticipatory bail filed by Dinesh Singh, who was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 15 litres of liquor and having a motorcycle seized. The petitioner contended that he had no conscious …
The petitioner, Chandan Bharti, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 968.76 litres of liquor from two cars and a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the seized …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where liquor was allegedly recovered from several vehicles. He argued that he was not caught in possession, did not own the vehicles, and was implicated solely on a …
Subodh Kumar, the owner of an e‑rickshaw from which 45 litres of liquor were recovered, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with an alleged offence under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in …
The petitioner, Sunil Mallik, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that the alleged liquor recovered from a bush and a motorcycle did not …
The petitioner, Dipak Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where three litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a scooty he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was unaware of his …
The petitioner, Mantosh Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 11.34 litres of liquor from a straw near his house. The petitioner argued that he has a …
The petitioner, Rajnish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 16.02 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a cowshed not belonging to him. He argued that the recovery was not from his possession and that the complainant …
The petitioner, Rajkumar Nat, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 14 litres of liquor from plastic gallons near his village. He contended that he was not apprehended at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the recovery …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 54 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not caught in the act, did not own the vehicle, and was implicated solely on the basis of a chowkidar’s …
The petitioner, Baban Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 30 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and that the FIR omitted the …
The petitioners, Ghanshyam Kumar and Kanhaiya Kumar, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 28.440 litres of liquor from their joint family house. They argued that they have clean antecedents, that the liquor was not in their conscious …
Shyam Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging he was involved in the recovery of 190 litres of liquor from a public cremation ghat. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at …
