Created by Fuzzy Cloud

SATYAVRAT VERMA

5892 judgments · newest first · showing 4401–4600

Ful Mohammad @ Md. Wasim AlamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ful Mohammad (Md. Wasim Alam), feared arrest in a case (PS‑Dagarua Case No. 288 of 2025) for allegedly possessing 8.250 litres of liquor recovered from an auto, an offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. He asserted that he has a clean …

Sunil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Sunil Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Procedure Code. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner then sought the court's permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The learned counsel for the …

Kiran Devi @ Ranju DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kiran Devi, was implicated in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the BNS and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering five litres of liquor from a location adjacent to her shop. She argued that the liquor was not in her conscious possession, the alleged …

Sunil Mahto @ Sunil Kumar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The appellant Sunil Mahto filed a criminal appeal seeking anticipatory bail in a case pending before the Special Judge, SC/ST, Vaishali. During the hearing, counsel for the appellant requested permission to withdraw the appeal, stating that the appellant had already been arrested. The court …

Phucho YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellants Phucho Yadav and Bharat Yadav filed a criminal appeal against the State of Bihar and Sri Krishna Paswan. The Special Public Prosecutor pointed out that the memorandum of appeal was filed 262 days after the order and that the limitation petition was cryptic, offering no reason for the …

Raj Kumar Mistri @ Raj Kumar @ Raj Kumar VishvakarmaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, five members of the Vishvakarma community, were charged under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments (BNSS) and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for alleged caste-based abuse and assault during a dispute over crop cutting. …

Lallu Yadav @ Lallu Kumar @ Abishek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, four residents of Sultanpur, were charged under several provisions of the Bihar Non‑Specific Statutes (BNS) 2023 and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for allegedly firing at a house following a children’s dispute. They applied for …

Bulu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, four Yadavs from Karwayan village, were charged under several sections of the BNS, 2023 and Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant at his house. The Special Judge refused …

Kundan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

Kundan Kumar filed a petition before the Patna High Court seeking relief against the State of Bihar. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated notices, and the petitioner failed to rectify procedural defects within the three‑week period granted by the court. The petitioner’s …

Ranjit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjit Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 61 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, and was unaware of any …

Sheopujan Prasad @ Sirpujan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Eight petitioners, all residents of Chhaperatar village in Pandarak, Patna, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 117(2) and 351(2) of the Bihar Non‑Compete Statutes, 2023, read with Section 27 of the Arms Act. They claim the …

Ramesh Prasad SinhaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants Ramesh Prasad Sinha, Punam Devi and Atul Kumar Sinha appealed against the refusal of anticipatory bail in a case filed under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, the Indian Penal Code and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The informant, Jyoti Kumari, alleged caste‑based abuse, …

RUPESH YADAV@RUPESH KUMAR YADAVversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Rupesh Yadav was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. His counsel, Mr. Dilip Kumar, requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application after the arrest. The court considered whether a pending anticipatory bail application could be …

Akhilesh ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Akhilesh Chaudhary and Sundar Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 240 litres of liquor was allegedly recovered, of which 190 litres was found in a sack thrown by the accused while fleeing. They contended …

Md. Kamre Alam @ Md. KamareversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Kamre Alam, feared arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 363, 366(A), 365 and 34 relating to alleged kidnapping, rape and common intention. The victim, a 17‑year‑old girl, was recovered pregnant, had eloped with a man named Prince who is in custody, and reportedly does …

Vivekanand TiwariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, three brothers from Siwan, were arrested in a case registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged assault during a dispute over a land sale. They contended that the FIR was a retaliatory move by the informant, who was a patidar of the former landowner …

Jitendra SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jitendra Singh, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 45 litres of liquor from an auto he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that the driver misused his …

Chhathu Manjhi @ Chhatthu Manjhi @ Jitendra ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, four residents of Batani village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 121(1), 121(2), 132, 324(4) and 3(5) of the BNS, alleging false implication by an informant after a stone‑pelting incident. The petitioners' counsel withdrew …

Anshu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anshu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after the police alleged that 78.55 litres of liquor were recovered from a semi‑constructed house allegedly belonging to him, based on a confessional statement of his brother amid a property dispute. The petitioner claimed he had a clean criminal …

Guddu Chaudhary @ Guddu Kumar ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Chaudhary sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 80 litres of liquor. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the alleged location did not belong to him, and the complaint originated from a chowkidar …

Sikandar SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Sikandar Sah and Antima Devi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 35 litres of liquor and 100 litres of mahua from a hut adjacent to their house. They argued …

Lalmuni DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Lalmuni Devi sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 15 litres of liquor from her house, which is a joint family property. She argued she had no conscious possession, that the concept of deemed possession was …

Vinod SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vinod Sah, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018, for the alleged recovery of 54 litres of liquor from a public canal area. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, …

Santosh Mahto @ Santosh Kumar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Santosh Mahto, was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. His counsel, Ms. Lalita Kumari, sought the court’s permission to withdraw that anticipatory bail application. The court examined whether an anticipatory bail petition could be …

Bambam Giri @ Bambam Kumar GiriversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bambam Giri, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving multiple offences under the Bihar Narcotic and Smuggling Act (BNS) and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018. He alleged that the incident arose when a speeding vehicle blocked a police convoy, its occupant …

Praduman Kumar @ Praduman RaiversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Praduman Kumar, was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. He applied through counsel for permission to withdraw that anticipatory bail application. The Court examined whether a petitioner may withdraw the application after being …

Narendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Narendra Kumar, the owner of a vehicle from which 6,777.720 litres of liquor was seized, was charged under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that he had a clean antecedent, was not present at the spot of seizure, and was unaware that the …

Bittu Kumar @ Bitu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Bittu Kumar, Akash Kumar and Chhotu Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 110 litres of liquor from a public bush. They argued that they were not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in their …

Ranjit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 1,28,000 hemp balls were allegedly recovered from an auto and a scooty. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, no …

Satyam Ram @ Satyam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Satyam Ram, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 50 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He was not caught in possession and was implicated solely on a confessional statement made by another individual, Bhola, while in police …

Deepak Mahto @ Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Kumar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Deepak Mahto, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor recovered from another individual and a nearby mill. He asserted a clean criminal record and argued that no liquor was found in his …

Shrawan Kumar @ Shrawan Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shrawan Kumar Yadav, was implicated in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 36 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He claimed he had no possession of the …

Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Kumar Yadav @ Ashish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 78 litres of liquor from a Maruti car. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the vehicle's …

Tinku KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Tinku Kumar and Chhotelal Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of 50 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. They argued they were not in possession of the liquor and the case was based solely on a confessional …

Sahil Prakash RajversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sahil Prakash Raj, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 427.200 litres of liquor from a rented room. He asserted a clean criminal record and argued that the liquor was not found in his …

Birbahadur Manjhi @ Birbhadur ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Birbahadur Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 6.5 litres of liquor from a public bush behind a temple. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the location did not belong to him, …

Brij Mahto @ Brij Kishore ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Brij Mahto, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 15 litres of liquor recovered from his joint‑family house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the house is a joint …

Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Kumar, owner of a Scorpio vehicle, was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 63 litres of liquor from his vehicle under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting a clean antecedent and claiming he was unaware of his driver’s alleged misuse of the …

Alok Yadav @ Alok Kumar Yadav @ Alok KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Alok Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 106 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the vehicle's …

Shanti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shanti Devi, a woman with no prior criminal record, was implicated in a case alleging possession of one litre of liquor and ten litres of semi‑manufactured liquor, invoking multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act and Section 45 of the Bihar Excise Act. She contended that she was not …

Budho Tanti @ Budho TantaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Budho Tanti, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering five litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, and that …

Ajeet Kumar @ Ajit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajeet Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where liquor was allegedly recovered from two motorcycles he owned. He argued that he was not caught in possession, that the police relied on the vehicle ownership and a …

Dinesh PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Dinesh Paswan applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 12 litres of liquor from his courtyard. The petitioner argued he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was not found in his conscious …

Ritesh Kumar GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ritesh Kumar Gupta sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bihar Non‑Excise and Bihar Excise Acts. He contended that he was falsely implicated, his name appearing only in the confessional statement of an accused who was already on regular bail, and …

Anil SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anil Sah, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from a tyre. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at …

Manish Kumar RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manish Kumar Ray applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the BNS and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 170 litres of spirit and 2 litres of spurious liquor from the house of Sachin …

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, for the alleged recovery of 34.56 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor …

Bittu Ray @ Bittu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bittu Ray, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 242.640 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, the liquor was not in his possession, the alleged …

Virat KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Virat Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with offences under Sections 30(a) and 45 of the Excise Act, where 55.180 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a house that is a joint family property. The petitioner …

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application in the Patna High Court after being implicated in a criminal case. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner’s counsel subsequently sought the court’s permission to withdraw the anticipatory …

Pappu Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pappu Kumar Yadav, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He claimed he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, and was unaware …

Atal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Atal Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Excise Act, involving the recovery of 30 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued that he had a clean …

Neeraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Neeraj Kumar sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 14.75 litres of liquor from a house owned jointly by Lal Singh and Dheeraj Kumar. The petitioner argued that he had no conscious possession …

Saroj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Saroj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 45 litres of liquor from a scooty he owned. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that another person …

Indal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Indal Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged possession of 4.875 litres of liquor. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent and that the alleged …

Rakesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 10.98 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which he claims is joint family property and that he had no conscious possession. He asserted a clean antecedent and argued …

Vilash RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vilash Ray, feared arrest in a case alleging that 27 litres of liquor were recovered from his motorcycle, an offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor …

Ganesh Singh @ Ganesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ganesh Singh (also known as Ganesh Yadav), a resident of Kayam Nagar, Bhojpur, feared arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 150 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he has a clean criminal record, was not in …

Krishna Sharma @ KrishnaversusThe State of Bihar

D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

Krishna Sharma filed a criminal miscellaneous petition (No.2376 of 2026) arising from PS case No.8 of 2025 in the High Court at Patna. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the State of Bihar was represented by learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Mr. Syed Mojibur Rahman. The court …

Suraj Kumar @ Suraj RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Suraj Kumar, a resident of Daulatganj, applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case registered under Section 111 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, concerning the alleged recovery of …

Saroj Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Saroj Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging that 60.48 litres of liquor were recovered from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he was not present …

Mankesh ChauhanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mankesh Chauhan, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 100.8 litres of liquor from a room he allegedly rented. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and …

Vakil PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vakil Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 108 litres of liquor concealed near a public mazar. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location was public, and the …

Surendra RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Surendra Rai, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 6.75 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was unaware of his friend's misuse …

Nipoo KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Nipoo Kumari applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act where 27 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a motorcycle she owned. She asserted that she has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was unaware that …

Vikesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vikesh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016 for allegedly possessing 33 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle. He asserted a clean criminal record, claimed he was not the vehicle's …

Lalbabu BaithaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Lalbabu Baitha, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging recovery of 12 litres of liquor from a scooty he owned, under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in …

Raja Kumar @ Raja BabuversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Raja Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 153.25 litres of liquor, 20 litres of spirit, and seizure of a motorcycle. The petitioner claimed a clean antecedent, no …

Devnath Pal @ GagaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Devnath Pal, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 102.4 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, the house is jointly owned, …

Sonu kumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 140 litres of liquor from a hut not belonging to him. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor and that the …

Ramkewal SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ramkewal Sahani applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 14.5 litres of liquor from shops he owned. He argued that no liquor was seized from his possession, that he was …

Praman SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Praman Sahni, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 70 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was …

Rakesh Kumar KushwahaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Rakesh Kumar Kushwaha and Sujet Paswan, were implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 37 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. They argued that they had no prior criminal record, that the liquor was not found in their …

Munna RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Munna Rai, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), (b) and (c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly recovering 60 litres of liquor and 4,000 kg of Mahua solution, which were destroyed at the spot. He was not arrested at the scene and the …

Kunti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kunti Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, where 80 litres of liquor was recovered, 35 litres allegedly from her house. She argued she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that the liquor …

Anand Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Anand Kumar Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 1.98 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not in …

Bipat SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bipat Sahni, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor from a public bamboo clump. He argued he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, …

Satrudhan Kumar Yadav @ Satrudhan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Satrudhan Kumar Yadav, was implicated in a case involving the alleged recovery of 468 litres of liquor from four motorcycles, alleged offences under IPC sections 272, 273, 414 and 34 and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. He had not been arrested at the spot and no liquor was found in …

Raja Kumar @ Raja Kumar Mandal @ Rakesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Raja Kumar sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 44.100 litres of liquor from a house not owned by him. The petitioner argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not …

Sanjay SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Sanjay Sahni and Rajiv Sahni, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor and fermented mahua from a public riverbank. They argued that they were not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in their possession, and the …

Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vikash Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging that 43.2 litres of liquor were recovered from an orchard behind his house. The petitioner claimed he was not present at the spot, that the liquor was not in his possession, and that a …

Umesh SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Umesh Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 105 litres of liquor from his house and 200 litres from a nearby location. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the house is joint …

RAMESH MAHTOversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners – three residents of Kesariya, East Champaran – applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 60 litres of liquor. They contended that they were not arrested …

Rina DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rina Devi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 45 litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned. She argued that she had no prior criminal record, was not present at the spot of …

Shatrughan Sahni @ Shatrudhan Sahni @ Satrudhan SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shatrughan Sahni sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging the recovery of 12,600 litres of liquor from a pit adjacent to his house. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his …

Mohit YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Mohit Yadav and Pappu Yadav applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that the seized liquor and vehicles were not in their possession and that they were implicated by a hostile watchman …

Laxman PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Laxman Paswan, the petitioner, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly possessing 7 litres of liquor in his shop, though he was not arrested at the scene and claimed a clean criminal record. He applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal …

Ranjeet Sah @ Ranjeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Petitioner Ranjeet Sah applied for anticipatory bail. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court granted the request, allowing the withdrawal. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was …

Suraj Paswan @ Suraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Suraj Paswan applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 5.4 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and that he is not the …

Naresh MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Naresh Mandal applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 138 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a mango orchard owned by Ramdas, a place unrelated to the petitioner. The petitioner argued that he was not caught in possession, …

Chhotelal PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Chhotelal Paswan applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case alleging offences under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the Excise Act, where 40 litres of liquor were recovered from his joint‑family house. The petitioner argued that the …

Raju KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raju Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 317(5) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of large quantities of liquor from a house and two motorcycles. He argued …

SalauddinversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Salauddin, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing three litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession at the time of seizure, and was unaware that another …

Santosh ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Choudhary sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where he was alleged to be involved in the recovery of 37 litres of liquor and 1760 litres of semi‑manufactured liquor from a location not belonging to him. He argued that he was not …

Sanjeet Yadav @ Sanjit YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjeet Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 25 litres of liquor were recovered from his under‑construction house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the …

Vicky KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Vicky Kumar and Sunil Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging that the liquor was recovered from a river bank not belonging to them and that they were implicated solely on secret information …

Vikram KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vikram Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 57 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, the alleged liquor was …

Bhola Tiwari @ Bhola Ji TiwariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Bhola Tiwari applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 76.32 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not in possession of the seized car, was not the owner, and that the case against him was based …

SHIV SHANKAR SAHNI @ SHIVSHANAKR SAHNIversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shiv Shankar Sahni applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 40 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He contended that he was not in possession at the time of seizure and was …

Bachche Nadaf @ Mohammad Ishad @ Md. Ishad @ BachcheversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bachche Nadaf (also known as Mohammad Ishad), was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 10.95 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, that the liquor was not found in his conscious …

Ghuran RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ghuran Ram, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 22.2 litres of liquor were recovered from a bush not belonging to him. He claimed the complaint was instigated by a hostile chawkidar and that he had no …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Rahul Kumar appealed against the exclusive special judge's order rejecting his anticipatory bail in a case involving multiple serious offences under the IPC, Arms Act and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. He argued that the notice was validly served through a jointness application, he has a …

Amit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Amit Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal case (PS Case No. 35 of 2023) alleging that he and the respondent, Pallavi Singh, are cohabiting with a child. Both parties appeared before the court and affirmed that they are staying together, with the …

SURESH YADAV @ SURESH KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

CONVERTED

Suresh Yadav appealed a criminal conviction arising from PS case No.31 of 2025 in Gaya. The appellate court observed that the appeal was improperly framed, as the matter falls under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act and should have been filed as a criminal miscellaneous …

Sugiya DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, five women related to the deceased, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑death case registered under Sections 80(2) and 3(5) of the BNS. They contended that the informant was not an eyewitness, the allegations were vague and omnibus, and that they had clean …

Ranjan ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Ranjan Manjhi, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. Subsequently, he approached the court seeking permission to withdraw that application. The court heard arguments from counsel for both the petitioner and the State. Permission to withdraw was granted …

Dinesh Sao @ Dinesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellant, Dinesh Sao, was charged under several IPC provisions and Sections 3(1)(r)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting and extorting a landowner during a dispute over a boundary wall that was being demolished with a JCB. The informant claimed that the …

BALIRAM SHARMA @ Baliram Kumar SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, six members of the Sharma family, were accused of assaulting a neighbour and his wife over a dispute concerning a banana tree and adjoining land. They sought anticipatory bail, claiming they have clean antecedents and that the injuries alleged were minor, arguing they were falsely …

Munna Singh @ Sanjay Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Munna Singh (Sanjay Kumar Singh) appealed against the refusal of anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 448, 341, 323, 354B, 427/34 of the IPC and Sections 3(1)(r)(s)(h) of the SC/ST Act. The FIR alleged that the appellant, while intoxicated, entered the complainant’s house, used …

Chanda KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chanda Kumari, was implicated in an excise case for the alleged recovery of 1,290 litres of liquor from a scooter she owned. She contended that she had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was unaware of the misuse of her vehicle by …

Ravi Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, Ravi Kumar Yadav and Vinay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 37 of the Excise Act and Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act. The FIR alleged recovery of four empty liquor bottles, four cartridges and a motorcycle, and the …

Bibha DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bibha Devi, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 6.5 litres of liquor from a house that is part of a joint family property. She contended that she had no actual possession of the liquor, has a clean criminal …

Sunny Rai @ Sunny KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Sunny Rai and Md. Mazhar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of 367.92 litres of liquor from an ambulance. They argued that they were not arrested at the spot, had no possession of the seized vehicle, …

Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vikash Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, where 212 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from three motorcycles. The petitioner argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not …

Uday Shankar Kuwar @ SonuversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Uday Shankar Kuwar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged illegal possession of liquor under Sections 292 and 111 of the BNS and Sections 30(a), 32, 41(i)(ii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He contended that he has a clean …

Rajan MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajan Mandal, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case concerning the alleged recovery of 457.8 litres of liquor from two vehicles, alleged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not caught in …

Rahul YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rahul Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 23.165 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not arrested at …

Kavita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Kavita Devi sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 60 litres of liquor from her joint family house. She argued she had no conscious possession, the liquor was not in her exclusive control, and she had a clean …

Aditya Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Aditya Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 5,385.12 litres of liquor from two vehicles. He contended that he was not present at the spot, had no possession of the liquor, and was not the owner of the seized …

Chandan Manjhi @ Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandan Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 12 litres of liquor from the verandah of his joint‑family house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, that the concept of …

Upendra ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Upendra Manjhi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of ten litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not …

Mukesh Chaudhary @ Mukesh Pasi @ Mukesh ChoudhariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mukesh Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 7 litres of liquor from a hut. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not found in his possession, and the allegation arose …

Mannu @ Abhimanyu Kumar @ Abhimanyu PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mannu @ Abhimanyu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning of a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 2.4 litres of liquor from his residence, a joint family property. He argued that no liquor was found in his conscious possession, the …

Pushpa DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Pushpa Devi, the wife of a deceased man, applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging that 78.300 litres of liquor were recovered from an auto she owned. She was not arrested at the spot and the liquor was not found in her personal …

Prabhat Kumar Rai @ Prabhat KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Prabhat Kumar Rai, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 570 litres of liquor and 7,000 litres of raw jawa from the bank of the Gandak River, which were destroyed on the spot. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the …

Kavita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Kavita Devi, a widow residing in Patna, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 20 litres of liquor from her house. She contended that the liquor was located in a …

Hira PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Hira Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 20 litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, that the concept of deemed …

Mumtaj @ Mumtaj DeviversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Mumtaj Devi, filed an anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Procedure Code. While the application was pending, she was arrested by the police. Her counsel then sought the Court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application, arguing that the purpose of the …

Jai Prakash ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jai Prakash Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was …

Arvind KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Arvind Kumar, the petitioner, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for the alleged recovery of 144 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in conscious …

Anil Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anil Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after a police case was registered under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 23.250 litres of liquor and seizure of …

Nitin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nitin Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, where 114.63 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, …

Sharda DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sharda Devi applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged possession of 11 litres of liquor, six litres of which were said to be recovered from her house. She argued that she has a clean …

FULAN CHAUDHARY @ PHULAN CHAUDHARYversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Fulan Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 5.75 litres of liquor. He contended that he was not arrested at the scene, no liquor was found in his possession, the …

Akash Kumar Paswan @ Ashish Kumar PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Akash Kumar Paswan, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. His counsel, Mr. Pramod Mishra, subsequently sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The …

Niraj Kumar Manjhi @ Neeraj Kumar ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Niraj Kumar Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, for the alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a scooty he owned. He argued that he had a clean …

Bikash Yadav @ Ram Bikash YadavversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Petitioner Bikash Yadav applied for anticipatory bail in a criminal case. While the application was pending, he was arrested. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court, after hearing both sides, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, …

Lalan MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Lalan Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 25 litres of liquor from a public riverbank. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and the …

Jitendra Chaudhary @ Jitend chaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jitendra Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 106.20 litres of liquor were recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that he was …

Mohammad FaijanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mohammad Faijan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged offences under several IPC sections, the Motor Vehicles Act and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, relating to the recovery of 2799.360 litres of liquor from a truck. He contended that he has a …

Babloo KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Babloo Kumar, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging that 40 litres of liquor were recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was implicated merely because he owned the …

Chhabila MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chhabila Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Non‑Statutory (BNS) Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, relating to alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor from the bank of the Tilaway river. The …

Chandan Srivastava @ Chandan Kumar SrivastavaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandan Srivastava, was implicated in a case alleging the recovery of 2,365.375 litres of liquor from his pickup vehicle, invoking Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, …

Ajeet Kumar @ Chote @ ChhoteversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajeet Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act read with Section 111 of the BNS for allegedly recovering 43.2 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not caught in …

Ranjeet Kumar @ Ranjeet Kumar HembramversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjeet Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from a bicycle. He was not caught in possession and is not the owner of the bicycle; his implication rests on a confessional statement made by …

Krishnadeo GoswamiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Krishnadeo and Vishnudeo Goswami, father and son, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 28.59 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not arrested on the spot, and had no conscious …

Jitendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 6.3 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was unaware …

Kishan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Kishan Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application in the High Court of Patna. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then approached the court seeking permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The court, after hearing counsel, granted permission to withdraw. …

PAWAN MAHTO @ PAVAN MAHTOversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pawan Mahto, a person with a clean antecedent, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of five litres of liquor from a location behind his house. He feared arrest as the alleged liquor was not found in his possession and the …

Raj Kishore SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Raj Kishore Sahani and Shiv Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 395 litres of liquor and 400 litres of semi‑manufactured liquor that was destroyed near a river. They argued they have …

Jwala SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jwala Singh, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 1,293.06 litres of liquor from two boats on the Ganga. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, did not own the boats, and …

Tunni Devi @ Tuni DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Tunni Devi and Lakshman Mahto, aunt and uncle of an informant, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case (PS Sheikhpura Case No. 276 of 2025) involving multiple offences under the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act, 2023. They claim to have clean antecedents and assert that …

Sanjeet Kumar @ Sanjeet ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjeet Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of liquor from his shop, which he had let on rent to Kalandar Singh. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, had a clean antecedent, …

Amit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Amit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging recovery of 1,950 litres of liquor from two motorcycles and a sack, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He asserted a clean criminal record, claimed he was not in …

Rahul YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Yadav, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 33 of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 480 litres of spirit from a car he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that another person, Vijay, …

Bharti Gerai @ Bharati Gorai @ Bharti GorainversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bharti Gerai, a woman with a clean antecedent, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 360 ml of liquor from a car she owned. She argued that the liquor was not found in her conscious possession, she was not arrested at …

Amit Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Amit Kumar Sah and Gourav Kumar Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(i) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly transporting 148.78 litres of liquor in a vehicle they owned. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not in possession …

Sonu Dewan @ Danish RajaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Dewan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, concerning the alleged recovery of 630 litres of liquor from a Scorpio. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not the owner of the …

Vijanti Devi @ Bijanti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vijanti Devi, the wife of Mahavir Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 280 litres of liquor from her Scorpio vehicle. She argued that the liquor was not in her conscious possession and that she was …

Raju Sah @ Raju Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Raju Sah sought anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 570 litres of liquor and 7,000 litres of raw Jawa from a riverbank. The petitioner argued that no liquor was found in his …

Chhotak Musahar @ Chotak Mushahar @ Kariya MusaharversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chhotak Musahar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that 20 litres of liquor were recovered from an open field not under his possession. He argued that the chowkidar who implicated him did not inform police earlier, …

Satendra NoneiaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Satendra Noneia, owner of a Scorpio vehicle, was implicated in a case (PS Nautan Case No. 261 of 2025) for alleged recovery of 666 litres of liquor, alleged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that the liquor was seized from his vehicle without his knowledge, that he had a …

FARMAN ALI @ MD. FARMANversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ALLOWED

The appellants, eight individuals from Dogachhi village, were charged under several IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly setting fire to an informant's hut. They contended that the allegations were false, arising from a land dispute, and that they had previously …

Md. SadiqueversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, Md. Sadique and Jawed, appealed under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the refusal of anticipatory bail by the Special Judge in a case involving alleged offences under the IPC and the SC/ST Act. The informant alleged that the accused forcibly …

Santosh Kumar @ Santosh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, a group of nine individuals including Santosh Kumar, were charged under multiple IPC sections (147, 149, 341, 323, 325, 307, 504, 506) and Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly snatching a motorcycle and assaulting the informant's family on 2 …

Mahavir YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, a group of nine individuals including Santosh Kumar, were charged under multiple IPC sections (147, 149, 341, 323, 325, 307, 504, 506) and Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly snatching a motorcycle and assaulting the informant's family on 2 …

Nitish Kumar @ Guddan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, six individuals from Ballopur village, were charged under multiple IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged assault, abuse, chain snatching and political intimidation on 8 June 2024. Their anticipatory bail application was rejected by the Special Judge, …

Anant Kumar @ Munna Singh @ Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anant Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and (d) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 82 litres of liquor from a brewery. He argued that he was not caught in the act, no liquor was found in his possession, he was not named …

Sujit Kumar @ S.K. MishraversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sujit Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging that 20 litres of liquor were recovered from his Scorpio vehicle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the …

Kartik @ Kartik JainversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kartik Jain, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case alleging offences under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 310.5 litres of liquor from a car he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, …

Gorelal YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gorelal Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly having 57.375 litres of liquor seized from his auto. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the …

Bhola SaoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bhola Sao, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 300 litres of liquor from his Bolero vehicle and a motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean …

Gudan Rai @ Abhishek RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Gudan Rai, a resident of Gopalganj, applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, alleging that 81.9 litres of liquor were recovered from a Mahindra vehicle. The petitioner claimed he had no prior criminal record, was not the …

Heera Lal MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Heera Lal Mandal applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 15 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware of any misuse of his vehicle by a …

Binod ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Binod Choudhary, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 210 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He contended that …

Pankaj ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pankaj Thakur, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging that he concealed 112.9 litres of liquor in a bamboo orchard. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and he …

Banti KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Banti Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was unaware that another …

Bullet MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Bullet Mukhiya applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of 138 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of …

Anupam KhekettaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anupam Kheketta, sought anticipatory bail after a police seizure of 1,206 litres of liquor from a pickup vehicle he owned, alleging he had no knowledge of the illicit use of the vehicle. He argued he had a clean criminal record and that ownership alone should not implicate him. The …

Dipesh Kumar @ Dipesh Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Dipesh Kumar and Santosh Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 10.125 litres of liquor from a sack not in their …

Sanjeet Ray @ Sanjeet Kumar @ Sanjeet RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjeet Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 48 litres of liquor from his residence, which is a joint family property. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession and that the 2018 …

Bela @ Vikas Kumar @ Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vikas Kumar, feared arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 35 litres of liquor recovered from a jute sack near a canal. He argued that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, the location did not …

Arun RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Arun Ray, the owner of a pickup vehicle, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 495 litres of liquor. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a person named Suraj misused his vehicle, …

Suman KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Suman Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(d) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 1,600 litres of fermented jawa mahua from a public bush. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no possession, and the …

Dharmendra RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dharmendra Ray, was implicated in a case registered under Section 317(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 28.4 litres of liquor, of which 17.4 litres were said to have been recovered from a co‑accused, Subodh. The petitioner argued that he …

Shiwaji SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shiwaji Sahani, a resident of Sheohar district, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 684 litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and is not the orchard's …

Pappu Sahni @ Pappu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pappu Sahni, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 684 litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the orchard's owner, and was implicated solely on a co-accused's …

Munni Lal ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Munni Lal Manjhi, filed an anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Miscellaneous proceeding. While the application was pending, the petitioner was arrested. The petitioner’s counsel sought the court’s permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application on the ground of …

Kirani RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Kirani Rai and Arvind Rai were implicated in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 120 litres of liquor from a public area. They argued that they have no prior criminal record, were not …

Nagendra RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nagendra Ray, a resident of Vaishali with a clean antecedent, had been granted provisional anticipatory bail on 18-12-2025 by a coordinate bench. The State of Bihar sought clarification on the ownership and details of a seized vehicle allegedly linked to the alleged offence, …

Kanhaiya Shah @ Kanhaiya KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Kanhaiya Shah and Mithilesh Choupal, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that liquor was recovered from a vehicle they did not own. They contended that they were …

Nirmohi ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nirmohi Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 15 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not the owner of the vehicle, the liquor was not found in his possession, and that …

Raman Kumar JhaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raman Kumar Jha, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 40.800 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not present at the spot of seizure, and was unaware that another …

Prakash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Prakash Kumar, a resident of Vaishali district, applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 10,600 litres of liquor from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that the …

Rakesh ChaudhariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rakesh Chaudhari, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for alleged possession of 80 litres of liquor and 600 litres of Jawa Mahua jaggery solution recovered from a ruined house. He contended that he has a clean …

Ajeet Kumar Vishwakarma @ Ajeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajeet Kumar Vishwakarma, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the seizure of 918 litres of liquor from two cars and a motorcycle. He asserted that he had a clean antecedent and was not in possession of the liquor, merely owning the seized …

Jitendra Kumar @ Jitendra Kumar Singh @ Jitendra SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Jitendra Kumar and Amit Kumar, were implicated in an excise case for allegedly recovering 319.680 litres of liquor from a tractor. They have prior criminal antecedents—one case for the first petitioner and two for the second. They applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) …

Anil MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anil Mahto, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 270 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, …

Prince Kumar @ Pince KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Prince Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after the police alleged his involvement in an offence under Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The informant claimed that on 10 August 2025 two suspects were seen near the Buddha Colony police station; one fled throwing a country‑made pistol …

Komal DasversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Komal Das, applied for anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016 alleging possession of liquor and Jawa Mahua. He argued that he has a clean antecedent and that the alleged seizure occurred at a location not …