Created by Fuzzy Cloud

SATYAVRAT VERMA

5892 judgments · newest first · showing 4601–4800

Rupesh Paswan @ Rupesh Kumar PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Rupesh Paswan and his sister‑in‑law Ruby Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the POCSO Act. The allegations centre on a third person, Vikash, who is accused of luring a 13‑year‑old girl, taking …

Raushan Kumar @ Raushan PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raushan Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged seizure of 92.100 litres of liquor from an E‑rickshaw he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle, which was rented to a person named Vimla …

Amit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Amit Kumar, a resident of Kasba Mehsi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 119(1), 308(2), 318(4), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He contended that the FIR was false, arising from a land dispute in which the informant allegedly tried to …

Arun KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Arun Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving the illegal possession of 22.337 litres of liquor and a rifle, alleged under Sections 25(1‑b)a/26 of the Arms Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016. The FIR alleged that the …

Jawed Alam @ Md. Javed @ JawedversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Jawed Alam and Shamshad Azad, were implicated in a kidnapping and alleged sexual assault case involving a 15‑year‑old girl, with charges under IPC sections 363, 366A, 504, 34 and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. Jawed Alam withdrew his anticipatory bail application, while Shamshad Azad …

Aasmin KhatoonversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Aasmin Khatoon and Md. Arman, wife and brother of accused Md. Tanvir, feared arrest in a case alleging assault on police officers and related offences under several IPC sections. They claimed they have clean antecedents and were falsely implicated by an informant, noting that Md. Tanvir …

Munna YadavversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioners, five individuals from Umrai Bigaha village, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. The State opposed the application. During the hearing, the petitioners’ counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. Justice Satyavrat Verma …

Sujit Paswan @ Sanjiv KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Sujit Paswan, sought anticipatory bail in a case where he was alleged to have participated in an arson that resulted in the death of an informant and injuries to the informant's wife. The FIR originally charged him under Sections 341, 325, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, later …

Vishal SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vishal and Rahul Singh applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023. They contended that the FIR was filed by a family informant who sought to evict them from a house, and that the alleged assault …

Pintu Idrishi @ Pintu AlamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Pintu Idrishi and Samir Idrishi, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 109, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act, based on an informant's allegation of their involvement in a shooting incident …

Nikhil SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Nikhil Singh applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. He alleged that the informant falsely implicated him, claiming that he and two unknown persons assaulted the informant, causing a finger …

Asha DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Asha Devi, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 133.5 litres of liquor from her residence. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that the …

Mahesh ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, five residents of Sonaul Sultan village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita relating to waging war against the state, unlawful assembly, assault on police and other offences. The FIR alleged that during …

Mithlesh ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mithlesh Manjhi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Sections 30(a), 37(b) and 37(c) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor and fermented jaggery solution from a jointly owned family house. The petitioner …

Karu Yadav @ Ajay Yadav @ Ajay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Karu Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 2,500 litres of liquor from thirteen motorcycles. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious …

Pappu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Pappu Singh applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Bhargama P.S. Case No. 182 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352 and 3(5) of the BNS read with Section 27 of the Arms Act. He asserted that he has a clean record and that the informant’s …

Abhishek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Abhishek Kumar and Indal Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 concerning alleged recovery of 210 litres of liquor. They argued that the liquor was not in their possession, the …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that the alleged recovery of 720 litres of liquor was from a pit not belonging to him and that the only evidence against him was a …

Vinay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vinay Kumar sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 40 litres of liquor were recovered from two motorcycles linked to him. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested on …

Brajesh Kumar Yadav @ Brajesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, three residents of Kharauni village, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable (B.N.S.) Act relating to assault and other offences. They claim to have clean antecedents and assert that the informant has falsely …

Chintu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Chintu Singh and Rani Devi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 87 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 for alleged kidnapping of a girl on 13‑12‑2024. They contended they have clean antecedents, the FIR was lodged after an undue delay of eight …

Kamal Dev Singh @ KamaldevversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, three brothers from Mahuli village, feared arrest in a case (PS 198/2025) alleging assault under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code. They claimed to have clean antecedents and argued that the informant’s FIR was vague and that they were falsely implicated. Their counsel …

Santosh ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Excise Act, alleging that 37.325 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He claimed a clean antecedent and argued that …

Rani Devi @ Rani KumariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rani Devi, a widow, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 85, 80(2) and 108 of the BNS, 2023 relating to alleged dowry demands, torture and the death of her daughter. The petitioner contended that she has a clean record and was falsely implicated by an …

Vishal Kumar Yadav @ Vishal Kumar @ RockyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vishal Kumar Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving a viral video showing firearms, alleged under Section 351(2) of the Bihar Narcotic (B.N.S.) Act, Sections 25(9), 7 and 27 of the Arms Act and Section 66D of the IT Act. The prosecution’s case was based on an …

Manoj YadavversusThe State of Bihar

D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

Manoj Yadav filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court in connection with a criminal miscellaneous case arising from PS Kurtha, Arwal. No counsel appeared on his behalf, while the State was represented by Advocate Sanjay Kumar Sharma. The court examined the application and …

Kiran DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Kiran Devi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged possession of 10 litres of liquor from one house and 20 litres from her own house. She contended that she has a clean antecedent, is a …

Shivlal MarandiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shivlal Marandi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where police alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor from a spot behind his house, with no material seized from his possession. He has one prior excise case. The petitioner argued that the …

Md. ShabbirversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Shabbir, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 324 litres of liquor from an auto he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the …

Ranjeet Patel @ Putul PatelversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjeet Patel, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with offences under Sections 30(a) and 41(i)(ii) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 14.94 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He has three prior cases under the Excise Act …

Budhan BhuiyanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Budhan Bhuiyan, a resident of Jharkhand, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 250 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the …

Sanoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanoj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that he was implicated only because he owned a motorcycle from which 61 litres of liquor were recovered, and that he had no prior criminal record. The petitioner …

Sadanand Kumar @ Sadanand YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sadanand Kumar Yadav, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 275 litres of liquor from two cycles. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was seized from his possession, …

Raja Yadav @ Raja KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raja Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 275 litres of liquor from two cycles. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no liquor in his …

Mahip KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mahip Kumar, the owner of a motorcycle and an auto, faced arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 after 300 litres of liquor were recovered from those vehicles. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the …

Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 180 litres of a liquor-like substance. He was not arrested at the scene and no contraband was found in his possession; the allegation rests on …

Pramila KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pramila Kumari, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016, where 750 ml of liquor was recovered from a motorcycle she owned. She argued that she had no prior criminal record, was not …

Guddu Kamat @ Jay KamatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Kamat applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 1,842.12 litres of liquor from a truck. The petitioner argued that he was not in possession of the seized liquor, was …

Yogendra Kumar @ YogiaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Yogendra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act alleging recovery of 13.875 litres of liquor from a public area. He contended that he has a clean criminal record, that the liquor was not in his …

Ketu BhagatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ketu Bhagat, sought anticipatory bail after the police alleged that 50 litres of liquor were recovered from a scooty he owned, implicating him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was …

Soviya DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Soviya Devi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in anticipation of arrest for alleged offences under Section 30(a) and 30(c) of the Excise Act, relating to the recovery of 14 litres of liquor from a house that is part of a joint family …

Raju Chaurasiya @ Raju Kumar ChaurasiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raju Chaurasiya, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 345.600 litres of liquor from a Bolero pick‑up. He contended that he was not arrested on …

Ashok Yadav @ Ashok KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ashok Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 171 litres of liquor from three motorcycles. He asserted that he has a clean …

Md. MustafaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Mustafa, was implicated in a case involving the alleged recovery of 629.64 litres of liquor from five motorcycles, alleged under IPC sections 272, 273, 414 and 34 and Excise Act section 30(A). He claimed a clean antecedent and argued that the liquor was not found in his …

Ramnath Sahani @ Ramanath SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramnath Sahani, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly recovering 300 litres of liquor and 800 litres of semi‑prepared liquor from a river bank. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no …

Suresh LalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Suresh Lal, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 147 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not present at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was implicated merely because he owned …

Arun Kumar @ Arun BindversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

Arun Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 60 litres of liquor from a primary school. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the scene, that …

Raja KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Raja Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 17 litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house. He argued that he had no conscious possession, the house being joint family property, and that the 2018 amendment to the …

Harilal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Harilal Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging that 408.835 litres of liquor were recovered from a litchi orchard near his house and that a motorcycle, 10 live cartridges, and other arms were seized from his residence, invoking Section 30(a) of the Excise Act and …

Raj Kumar ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raj Kumar Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in …

Kavindra Ram @ Kavindar RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kavindra Ram, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 95.040 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, that the property is jointly owned, …

Ajay Mahto @ Ajay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajay Mahto, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 35 litres of liquor and 40 litres of Jawa Mahua were recovered from a bamboo bush. He contended that he has …

Jagdish SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jagdish Sahni, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 8.640 litres of liquor from a rented room belonging to Sunil Kumar. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no conscious possession of …

Ratan PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ratan Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He alleged that the alleged seizure of 80 litres of liquor and 2,500 litres of jaggery …

Ranjeet Kumar GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Ranjeet Kumar Gupta, filed an anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Procedure Code. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. His counsel subsequently sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The learned judge …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 61.200 litres of liquor from a ditch adjacent to his house. He asserted a clean criminal record and argued that the allegation was based solely on a …

Mukesh Yadav @ Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 47(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 30 litres of liquor in his cattle shed. He argued he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was not in his immediate possession, and the shed is accessible to villagers who …

Kumari Simpa SagarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kumari Simpa Sagar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 34.560 litres of liquor from a scooty she owned. She argued that she had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle, had a clean …

Piyajo Dom @ Ajad KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Piyajo Dom @ Ajad Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 600 litres of liquor from a jute bag. He argued that he had no possession of the liquor, the alleged location was not his …

Ramikbal Bhagat @ Ramekbal BhagatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramikbal Bhagat, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 27.22 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He argued that no liquor was seized from his possession and the case was based solely on a confessional statement of …

Shambhu KushwahaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shambhu Kushwaha, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 50 litres of spirit from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the vehicle's owner, and the case rested on a confessional …

Prabhu PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Prabhu Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 12 litres of liquor from a thatched kitchen adjacent to his house. He asserted a clean criminal record and argued that the …

Diwakar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner Diwakar Kumar applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that liquor was seized from a garage where his motorcycle was being repaired and that he was implicated solely because he owned the vehicle. The …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rahul Kumar applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 314.28 litres of liquor from a hut that he does not own. The petitioner argued that he was not in possession of the liquor and that the police, acting on a local …

Bholu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Bholu Singh and Satyendra Ram sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. They argued that they had no prior criminal record (or only a minor antecedent for …

Santosh Tiwari @ Santosh Kumar TiwariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Tiwari sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 3324.945 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from two vehicles. He argued that he had no direct possession, was not the owner of the vehicles, and was implicated solely on secret …

Congress DasversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Congress Das, a resident of Dariyapur, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 75 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle. He argued that the vehicle was stolen, he had no …

Bablu Kumar @ Bablu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Bablu Kumar Yadav applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 360 litres of liquor from the bank of the Soti River. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the alleged recovery …

Bittu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bittu Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 9 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the vehicle owner, and the case relied solely on a …

Pinki DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Pinki Devi, the wife of Raj Kumar Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing four litres of liquor recovered from an abandoned place. She argued that the liquor was not in her conscious possession, she was not …

AKHALESH KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Akhalesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after a seizure of 71.125 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned, alleging he had no knowledge of the contravention and possesses a clean criminal record. The State opposed the bail, contending the seizure fell under Section 30(a) of the …

Pukari DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pukari Devi sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging possession of 63 litres of liquor recovered from her e‑rickshaw, with offences under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, Section 78 of the Juvenile Justice Act and Section 30(a) of …

Ravi PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravi Prasad, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 25 litres of liquor from his brother's house, which is a joint family property. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, no liquor was found in his …

Satyendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Satyendra Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging recovery of three litres of liquor from a shop not owned by him. He asserted a clean criminal record and argued that no liquor …

Rajesh RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajesh Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, relating to alleged recovery of 170 litres of spirit and 2 litres of spurious liquor from another person's house. …

Ajay Manjhi @ Ajay Kumar ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Ajay Manjhi and Rudal Manjhi, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 56 litres of liquor from a public bridge. They argued they have clean antecedents, the liquor was not found in their possession, …

Sonu Yadav @ Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor. The petitioner argued that he has a clean antecedent, the alleged liquor …

Munna YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Munna Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged alleging that he recovered 8.64 litres of liquor from a sugarcane field belonging to Khedi Yadav, an offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested …

Bablu ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Bablu Manjhi sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 85 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of the …

Kallu Yadav @ Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kallu Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 12 litres of liquor from a location behind another person’s house. The petitioner claimed he …

Jay Prakash Sahani @ Andul SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Jay Prakash Sahani and Bablu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that liquor was recovered from a bush not belonging to them and that they were not caught in possession. They …

Harekishun Singh @ Hare Kishan SinghversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

Harekishun Singh applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of 152.625 litres of liquor from a house not owned by him. He argued that the recovery was based solely on a …

Ramita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ramita Devi, the owner of a vehicle, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 126 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. She was not arrested at the spot and no liquor was found in her conscious possession; the prosecution’s case …

Vikash Kumar @ Vikash SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vikash Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 100.44 litres of liquor from a public bush. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the site did not belong to him, and that …

Prem Kumar GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Prem Kumar Gupta, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 8.64 litres of liquor from a scooty he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of …

Kaushal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kaushal Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, alleging that liquor was recovered from motorcycles he owned but he was not present at the seizure. He contended that he had no knowledge of the misuse of his vehicle …

Arun Kumar BhagatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Arun Kumar Bhagat, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 2.25 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property occupied by multiple tenants. He asserted that the liquor was not in his conscious …

Deepak Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar Sah, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for the alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from an e‑rickshaw he owned. He argued that he was not present at the spot of seizure, had no conscious possession …

Sam Narayan Chaudhary @ Satya Narayan ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sam Narayan Chaudhary, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of illicit liquor. The petitioner argued that he was not in actual possession of the liquor and …

Mukesh Kumar Singh @ Mukesh Singh @ Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Kumar Singh applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 36 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly transporting 1,364.250 litres of liquor. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, did not own the …

Rita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rita Devi, a resident of Darbhanga, applied for anticipatory bail after the police sought to arrest her in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, for the alleged recovery of 16.875 litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned. She argued that she had a …

Ramesh Sahni @ Ramesh SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Ramesh Sahni, filed an anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Procedure Code. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner’s counsel then sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Hon'ble Justice …

Vishal Chaudhary @ Vishal Kumar ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vishal Chaudhary, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 544.47 litres of liquor from a hut belonging to Manoj Kumar. The petitioner argued that …

Lalita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The appellant, Lalita Devi and Ram Jinis Raut, filed a criminal appeal (SJ) No.860 of 2024 arising from a police case in Sitamarhi. The respondents were the State of Bihar and Khushbu Kumari. During the hearing on 21-01-2026, counsel for the appellants sought the court's permission to withdraw the …

Rajesh Ranjan @ Raju SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The appellant, Rajesh Ranjan (Raju Singh), was charged under several IPC provisions and Section 3(i)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged assault, caste-based abuse, and a land‑related dispute. He contended that he has a clean record and that the complaint is false, arising …

Mohasin Ahmad @ Shibu @ Sibu MiyanversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The appellants, Mohasin Ahmad and Rinku Miya, filed a criminal appeal (SJ) No.2751 of 2024 before the Patna High Court. While the appeal was pending, both appellants were arrested. They subsequently applied to the Court for permission to withdraw their appeal. The learned Special Public Prosecutor …

Bablu SahversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, Bablu Sah and three others, were charged under several IPC offences and Section 3(1)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant and his companions and stealing money and a mobile phone. They applied for …

Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Mukesh Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal miscellaneous case. While the application was pending, the petitioner died. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application on the ground of the petitioner’s death. The Court, after hearing the …

Tarun Singh @ Tarun Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Tarun Singh sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 21(c) of the NDPS Act read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 78.9 litres of codeine syrup were allegedly recovered from a motorcycle. The petitioner argued that he was not in actual possession of …

RANJAN KUMAR @ RANJAY KUMARversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

DISMISSED

The appellants filed an appeal under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act seeking anticipatory bail after a Special Judge refused it in connection with FIR No.19‑2023 alleging fraud, cheating, and caste‑based harassment. The prosecution alleged that the accused had set up a …

Uma Shankar PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Uma Shankar Prasad, was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 180 litres of liquor from his vehicle, violating Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016-18-22. He sought anticipatory bail, arguing he had a clean antecedent and was unaware that his …

Ajit Kumar Singh @ Ajit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajit Kumar Singh, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 1,800 litres of liquor. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the scene, …

Mithun Ray @ Mithun Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The appellants, seven individuals from Budhasi Karbalia Tola, filed a criminal appeal (SJ) No.4026 of 2025 against the State of Bihar and Dhanraj Kumar Ram. During the hearing on 21-01-2026, the appellants' counsel sought the court's permission to withdraw the appeal on the ground that the parties …

Ram Niwas Rai @ Mukesh RanjanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Ram Niwas Rai (Petitioner 1) and Sharma Rai (Petitioner 2), filed anticipatory bail applications in a criminal case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. Petitioner 1, who had already been arrested, sought to withdraw his …

Mithilesh Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mithilesh Kumar Singh applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018, alleging that 33 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle he did not own and that the only evidence against him was a confessional statement made …

Ajay Kumar Sahni @ Ajay SahniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Ajay Kumar Sahni and Manikant Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Bibhutipur, Case No. 246/2023) involving multiple IPC offences including assault, robbery and criminal intimidation. They contended that the FIR was filed by an agnate informant with whom …

Shivam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shivam Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 32.5 litres of liquor and a motorcycle recovered from his uncle's premises. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not caught with the liquor, did …

Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Raushan Kumar, appealed under Section 14-A(2) of the SC/ST Act against the trial court’s refusal to grant anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged caste-based assault and robbery. He claimed a clean antecedent and argued that the FIR was filed 11 days after the incident, …

Pappu Paswan @ Pappu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pappu Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 10 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his kiosk. He has four prior criminal cases, three of …

Suraj Patel @ Suraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellants, Suraj Patel and Dharmendra Patel, appealed to the Patna High Court against the refusal of anticipatory bail under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. They contended that they have clean antecedents and were falsely …

Thakur Tudu @ Padum TuduversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Thakur Tudu and his wife Sunita Devi, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 45 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 30 litres of liquor from a village area. They argued they have no prior criminal record, were not caught in possession, and the liquor was …

Rudal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rudal Kumar applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 30(a), 30(c), 30(d) and 32(3) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 210 litres of spirit and 3,240 empty liquor bottles from his truck. The petitioner argued that he was not present at the spot of seizure, had a clean …

Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 153 litres of liquor from an auto. He asserted that he was not in possession of the vehicle, was not its owner, and was implicated solely on the basis of a …

Sarjun Yadav @ Sarjun KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Sarjun Yadav, appealed under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against a lower court order refusing anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged assault and caste-based abuse. The appellant argued that he was falsely …

Ravindra PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Ravindra Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a FIR (Supaul PS Case No. 368 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 65 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. He contended that he has a clean record and …

Rani DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rani Devi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged possession of 12 litres of liquor recovered from her joint family house. She argued that she was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in her …

Veena DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Veena Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274, 275, 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, relating to the alleged recovery of 261 litres of liquor and two motorcycles. She …

MANTOSH YADAVversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mantosh Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 24.675 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not caught in possession, does not own the seized vehicle, …

Sundar ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sundar Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor. He argued that the liquor was seized from a location not belonging to him and that the case was based solely on a confessional …

Prahlad Kumar Singh @ Pramod SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Prahlad Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a), 41(1), 31(1) and 31(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 5,385.12 litres of liquor from a truck and a car. He contended that he was …

Rajesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rajesh Yadav, owner of a pickup vehicle, was implicated in the recovery of 2,710.08 litres of liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that the liquor was seized from the vehicle, not from his personal possession, and that he was unaware of its misuse by a person …

Ram Adhar Rai @ Ramadhar RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Ram Adhar Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 109 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26, 35 and 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR alleged that he, together with two others, entered the informant’s house on 15‑04‑2025, fired ten …

Brjesh Kumar PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Brjesh Kumar Pandey, was implicated in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 and the B.N.S., 2023 for alleged possession of 255.72 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle and a car he owned. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious …

Awadhesh Kumar @ Avdhesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Awadhesh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a road robbery case (PS Sonbarsa Case No.36 of 2022) involving offences under IPC Sections 395 and 397. The FIR was lodged against unknown persons, and the petitioner’s name surfaced only through a confessional statement of an accused …

Santosh ChaudhariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Chaudhari applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 alleging that 4 litres of liquor were recovered from his joint‑family house. The petitioner argued that he had no conscious possession, the …

Akhilesh RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Akhilesh Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (Kopa PS Case No.164 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. He alleged that the FIR was a false implication arising from …

Shyam YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shyam Yadav, a 64‑year‑old senior citizen with a clean record, applied for anticipatory bail after the police seized weapons and alleged his involvement in offences under Sections 310(4), 310(5), 317(5) of the B.N.S. 2023 and Sections 25(1‑b)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. He contended that he was …

Sunil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunil Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from a third party's orchard. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and had no possession of the …

Dharmendra Yadav @ Golu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Dharmendra Yadav was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. His counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application after the arrest. The Court examined the request and granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the …

Omprakash Gupta @ Om PrakashversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Omprakash Gupta, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 165.630 litres of liquor from a public place. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the recovery site did not belong to him, and …

Dipu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dipu Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that the liquor recovered was not in his possession and the alleged site was public. He argued that the police relied on a chowkidar’s …

Md. Kamal @ Kamal SekhversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, three brothers from Ofapur, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged assault. They contended that the allegations were false, arising from a neighbour dispute over drainage, and that only one of …

Rajendra PalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑death case registered under Sections 304B and 34 of the IPC. They alleged that the informant’s sister was married in 2014, faced dowry demands, was assaulted, and later died, but …

Swaminath MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Swaminath Mahto, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 340.050 litres of liquor were seized from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the …

Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Santosh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 85.5 litres of liquor from an auto and a motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and the seized liquor was not …

Tuntun MehtaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, nine members of the Mehta family, were implicated in a case arising from a dispute that began when an informant's nephew accidentally struck Bahadur with a bicycle. The informant alleges that Bahadur and later the petitioners assaulted several persons, including the informant, using …

Bachchelal PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bachchelal Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Witch (Daain) Practices Act. He asserted a clean record and claimed he was falsely implicated, arguing that the FIR did not specifically allege assault …

Birju Yadav @ Vikash Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Birju Yadav, was implicated in a case under Sections 8(B), 18 and 29 of the NDPS Act for alleged involvement in opium cultivation on 24.99 acres of forest land. He contended that he has a clean antecedent and that the FIR does not disclose how his name was identified, arguing that …

Hareram Yadav @ Hareram SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Hareram Yadav and Vishendra Yadav sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging assault, robbery and other offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita arising from a dispute over the sale of a cow. They contended they have clean antecedents, that the alleged theft of …

Suraj YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Suraj Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 250 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor …

Brahmdeo Saw @ Badho SaoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Badho and Pankaj, were charged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 191(2) and 110 of the BNS for allegedly assaulting an informant during a dispute over buffalo feeding. They contended that the informant had fabricated the complaint, that Badho had previously been acquitted in a …

Mohan Chaupal @ Mohan ChoupalversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Mohan Chaupal was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application after the arrest. The court granted the request to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail …

Shriram Singh @ Dhudhali SinghversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Shriram Singh was served a notice under Section 35 of the BNSS after the police decided not to arrest him. Since he had no apprehension of arrest, he petitioned the High Court to withdraw his anticipatory bail application, seeking liberty to file a fresh application if needed. The court examined the …

Munna Kumar @ Munna YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Munna Kumar and Arvind Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 45 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not arrested on the spot, and had …

Jiwacch MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jiwacch Mahto Satyanarayan Mahto, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, alleging that 355.200 litres of liquor were recovered from a pickup auto and a motorcycle was seized, though he claimed no ownership or possession of the …

Nitesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Nitesh Kumar and Sangita Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 45 litres of liquor on a motorcycle they did not own. They argued that the police had relied on a chowkidar’s complaint without …

Sanjay MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjay Mandal, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of a large quantity of liquor from a truck. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, …

Nanki Paswan @ Nanhki PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Petitioner Nanki Paswan applied for anticipatory bail but was arrested while the application was pending. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application after the arrest. The Court considered whether a pending anticipatory bail application could be withdrawn …

Jitendra RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jitendra Ram, was implicated in a case for alleged possession of 18 litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle, under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued that he had no conscious possession, had a clean antecedent, and was …

Sudhir PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sudhir Paswan sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 24 litres of liquor from a public place. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the location did not belong to him, and the complainant (the chowkidar) failed to …

Shyam singh @ Shyam Kumar Singh @ Shyam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Shyam Singh was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought the court’s permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application on the ground that the petitioner had already been taken into custody. The court considered …

Ranjeet Kumar @ Ranjeet YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjeet Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that liquor and Mahua flowers were seized from a vehicle he did not own. He argued that the police relied on secret …

Mukesh Singh @ Mukesh Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mukesh Singh, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 3,335.4 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no possession of the liquor, was not the owner of …

Munna Singh @ Munna Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Munna Singh, accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 3,335.4 litres of liquor, sought anticipatory bail claiming he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the liquor, and was implicated solely on a confessional statement of another accused made in …

Bikki Kumar @ Bikki ParnabversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, five residents of Fatehjanpur, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 and multiple sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 relating to alleged recovery of 870 ml of liquor from …

Balinder Ray @ Sunil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Balinder Ray (alias Sunil Kumar), feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, alleging recovery of liquor, a motorcycle and a scooty. He claimed he was not in possession of the seized items, was not the owner, and was implicated solely …

Shatrughan ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shatrughan Manjhi, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 130 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from his joint‑family house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the property was jointly owned, and …

Upendra ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Upendra Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 45 litres of liquor from a public place near a railway crossing. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no …

Ratan Rai @ Ratan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ratan Rai, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 210 litres of liquor from the bank of the Ganga River. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession, the alleged recovery …

Ganesh MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ganesh Mahto, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 49.50 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, had a clean antecedent, and was unaware that another person, …

Ramashankar Yadav @ Vinod YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ramashankar Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 489.540 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the …

Sitaram RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sitaram Rai, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. The petitioner asserted that he …

Gultesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gultesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of three litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his shop, not from his possession. He asserted a clean criminal …

Bullet YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bullet Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail after fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, involving the alleged recovery of 32.4 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, the liquor …

Raju Bind @ LulhaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raju Bind, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 43 litres of liquor from a public area. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession and the case was based solely on a confessional statement of an …

Dilip KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dilip Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged illegal liquor possession (1525 litres) and offences under IPC sections 272, 273, 420 and the Bihar Excise Act. He argued he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested on the spot, did not have the liquor …

Abdesh Sahni @ Abadh Kishor Sahni @ AbdheshversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Petitioner Abdesh Sahni applied for anticipatory bail but was arrested while the application was pending. His counsel sought the court’s permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed …

Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 190.08 litres of liquor, though he was not arrested at the spot and no liquor was found in his possession. He contended that the case was based on secret …

Jitendra Rai @ Jitendra RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jitendra Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 30 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, that the concept of deemed possession was …

Pintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pintu Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, alleging that liquor was recovered from motorcycles he owned but he was not in possession at the time. He argued that he was unaware of his friend’s …

Shiv Shankar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shiv Shankar Mahto was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 16.575 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, and was unaware that a …

AJAY CHAUDHARY @ AJAY KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajay Chaudhary, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 35 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not caught in possession, and that the FIR does not disclose the …

Akhilesh Kumar @ Fujju @ FujjiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Akhilesh Kumar and Guddu Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 80 litres of liquor. They argued that no liquor was found in their possession, the alleged recovery occurred at a …

Mohan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mohan Yadav sought anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor, related articles and a motorcycle. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the …

Sarjun YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sarjun Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 65 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean criminal record, was not in possession of …

Rajesh Sahani @ Rajesh Kumar SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajesh Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from a bush near the Dhanauti river. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the recovery site did not …

Bholu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bholu Kumar, was implicated in a case involving the alleged recovery of 164.100 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned, attracting charges under Sections 272, 273 and 34 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. He contended that he had …

Vicki Verma @ Bikki KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vicki Verma (also known as Bikki Kumar), sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 4.320 litres of liquor from a garden and a motorcycle belonging to another person. The petitioner argued that he was not …

Tara DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Tara Devi sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 17.2 litres of liquor recovered from a scooty she owned. She argued that she was not in actual possession, was unaware of the …

Mohd. Mumtaz @ Mohd. Mumtaz Alam @ Mintu MiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Mohd. Mumtaz sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274, 275 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and Section 30(a) for alleged recovery of 1,840 litres of liquor from a pick‑up vehicle. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the …

Mohan Kumar @ Mohan RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mohan Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the BNS, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of 1,360 litres of liquor from a car. He has five prior criminal cases, three of which are excise matters, and claims he was …

Raja Ram @ Omprakash RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raja Ram, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor from a field adjacent to his house and from another house. He argued that he was not arrested, no liquor was …

Sunil YadavversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Sunil Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application in the High Court of Patna. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner’s counsel then sought the court’s permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court considered the …

Vishal DixonversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vishal Dixon, owner of a vehicle from which 420 litres of liquor were seized, applied for anticipatory bail, arguing he had no conscious possession of the liquor and had merely rented the car to a ride‑sharing service. He contended that the police implicated him solely because he was …

Niraj YadavversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Niraj Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 16 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of …

AJEET KUMAR @ AJEET SINGHversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajeet Kumar, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a), 30(c), 30(d) and 30(g) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 43 litres of liquor from a kiln. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the kiln, and was …

Dilip Mahto @ Dilip Rai @ Kari MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Petitioner Dilip Mahto had filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case. While the application was pending, he was arrested. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory …

Umesh Chaudhary @ Butan ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Umesh Chaudhary was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 14.8 litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard. He asserted that he had no possession of the liquor, the orchard did not belong to him, and that he possessed a clean criminal …

Chhotu Mandal @ Chhotu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chhotu Mandal, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that the alleged recovery of liquor was from a premises unrelated to him and based solely on a confessional statement made in police custody. He also highlighted …

Shushant Sharma @ Rabsan SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shushant Sharma, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 192 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the vehicle, and the …

Umesh PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Umesh Paswan, feared arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018, alleging recovery of liquor from locations adjacent to his premises. He contended that he had a clean antecedent and that the liquor was not found in his conscious …

Rahul SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rahul Sahani applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, alleging that liquor was recovered from two motorcycles but he was not arrested on the spot and does not own the vehicles. The petitioner has three prior excise …

Sanchu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanchu Kumar, was implicated in a case (Excise P.S. Case No. 339 of 2025) for alleged possession of 30 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle, had a clean criminal record, and was not in possession …

PUNNA CHOUDHRYversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Punna Choudhry feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging recovery of 240 litres of liquor from a public bush, with no possession or prior criminal record. He argued that the alleged recovery occurred on public land and that the …