Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
5892 judgments · newest first · showing 4801–5000
The petitioner, Nagendra Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged possession of liquor recovered from a joint family house. He argued that he had no conscious possession, the liquor could belong to other …
The petitioner, Ajay Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 36 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018, where 10 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from two motorcycles. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious …
The petitioner, Vijay Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), (b) and (c) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor and 2000 litres of fermented Jawa Mahua, which were destroyed. He argued that he had no prior criminal …
The petitioner, Ramesh Chaudhary, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 216 litres of liquor from a motorcycle and the courtyard of his house. He contended that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the seized …
The petitioner, Kanhaiya Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail after fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), (c) and (d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that the liquor and mahua seized were not in his possession and that he was falsely implicated by a …
The appellants appealed under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the refusal of anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged caste‑based assault, robbery and injury. The informant alleged that on 22‑02‑2025 the appellants, along with …
The appellant, Raju Kumar, filed a criminal appeal (SJ) No.2741 of 2025 before the Patna High Court challenging a decision of the lower court in PS case No.117 of 2025. During the hearing on 20-01-2026, counsel for the appellant sought the Court's permission to withdraw the appeal. The State, …
The appellants, Saroj Mahto and Hira Matho, appealed under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the refusal of anticipatory bail by the Additional Sessions Judge. They alleged that the informant’s FIR, filed two days after the alleged …
The appellants, Ramashish Sah and Dinesh Prasad, appealed under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the refusal of anticipatory bail by the Additional Sessions Judge. They contended that they were falsely implicated in a dispute over …
Petitioner Pramod Manjhi filed an anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Procedure Code. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner, through counsel, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court, after hearing …
The appellants, three residents of Gorhiyari Saidpur, were charged under several IPC offences and sections of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. After a superficial police investigation, the police submitted a final report exonerating them, but the …
The petitioner, Santosh Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of five litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. The petitioner argued …
The petitioner, Sunny Kumar, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the …
The appellant, Ritesh Kumar Sinha, filed a criminal appeal before the Patna High Court challenging the proceedings of the State of Bihar and respondent Jyoti Kumari. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant was arrested. Counsel for the appellant subsequently moved the court seeking …
The petitioner, Ashu Kashyap, sought anticipatory bail after the police seized 272.025 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned, alleging a violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle, was not in possession at the time of …
The petitioners, a family of five from Akbarpur, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 124(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 122(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS Act, 2023, arising from a land‑dispute incident involving alleged assault and robbery. They contended …
Munna Chaudhary sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 10 litres of liquor recovered from his house. He argued he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was in a joint family property, and no conscious possession was established, …
The petitioner, Dharamvir Prasad, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for alleged recovery of liquor from various locations, including his own house which is a joint‑family property. He argued that he had no conscious possession, that …
The petitioner, Khushabu Kumari, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 540 litres of liquor from a Scorpio vehicle and two motorcycles she owned. She contended that she had no knowledge of the misuse of her vehicle and possessed a clean …
Suraj Kumar, the owner of a motorcycle from which 6.48 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, arguing that he was not in possession of the liquor and was unaware of his friend's alleged misuse of the vehicle. The State …
Sunita Devi was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 4 litres of liquor from her residence, which is part of a joint family property. She applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that no liquor was …
Badal Nut sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 30 litres of liquor from a bush behind his house, which was not in his possession. The petition highlighted that the alleged recovery site did not belong to him and the FIR …
Manoj Sah, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 40 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He claimed he was not in possession of the liquor, did not own the motorcycles, and was implicated only after a chowkidar’s report, …
Petitioners Rambabu Chaudhary and Dhiraj Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Sections 30(a) and 41(i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for the alleged recovery of 295.200 litres of liquor from their jointly owned house. They argued that they …
The petitioner, Narayan Goswami, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 40 litres of liquor recovered from a semi‑constructed house. He was not arrested at the scene and the liquor was not found in his conscious possession. The …
The petitioner, Brij Kishor Chaudhary, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from premises adjacent to his shop. He argued that he was not arrested, no liquor was found in his possession, and the alleged recovery occurred on …
The petitioner, Priyanshu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning of a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 720 litres of liquor from a public riverbank. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and the alleged …
Mukesh Mukhiya sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under IPC sections 272, 273, 414, 34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where he is alleged to be linked to the recovery of 1,575 litres of liquor from five motorcycles. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested on the …
Awadhesh Kumar Ray applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 38(i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. He contended that he was not in possession of the alleged liquor, was not the owner of the truck from which 1,685.88 …
Petitioners Prabhu Narayan Yadav and Sulekha Devi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 110, 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. They contended that they have clean antecedents and were falsely implicated by an …
The petitioners, Uday Prasad and Tunni Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bihar Non‑Serious (BNS) Act and the Arms Act. They asserted they have clean antecedents and alleged that the informant falsely implicated them, claiming no …
Mukul Kumar, the owner of a motorcycle from which 17.28 litres of liquor was seized, feared arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being placed in his vehicle and that he had a clean criminal record. The State opposed his …
The petitioner, Lalan Koda, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging possession of 200 litres of liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018. He argued that the liquor was recovered from a joint family house, not from his conscious possession, and that …
Amit Kumar, the owner of a vehicle from which 92.35 litres of liquor was seized, applied for anticipatory bail, claiming he had no knowledge of the driver’s misuse and possesses a clean criminal record. The State opposed the bail, alleging offences under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar …
The petitioner, Bhagat Mahato, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the CrPC in connection with a case alleging offences under Sections 272 and 273 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, involving the recovery of 63.50 litres of liquor from his Hyundai car. He argued that …
The petitioner, Hridaya Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, concerning the recovery of 9.8 litres of liquor from a public bush, of which only 0.4 litre was linked to two …
The petitioner, Ravikant Prasad, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for the alleged recovery of 98.5 litres of liquor from his Alto car. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of …
The petitioner, Gulzar Ahmad, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 1,203.84 litres of liquor from a pickup vehicle and a motorcycle. He contended that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, was merely the owner of the motorcycle, and …
The petitioner, Sidhnath Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 25 litres of liquor from his residence. He contended that he has a clean criminal record, that the liquor was …
Bhikham Rai applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a FIR registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109 and 132 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act relating to a shooting incident that injured a woman. He contended that he was falsely implicated despite having three prior …
Vicky Kumar was implicated in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly transporting 1,633.38 litres of liquor in a truck. He contended that he neither owned the vehicle nor had knowledge of the liquor, and that the case was based solely on a confessional statement made by another person in …
The petitioners, four brothers named Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several offences of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. They asserted they have clean antecedents and alleged that the informant’s allegations were vague, exaggerated, and that they were falsely …
Petitioner Kaushal Kumar was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for the alleged recovery of 160 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and had no …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor and mahua jaggery solution, though no material was seized from his possession at the time of the incident. He sought anticipatory bail, arguing that the …
The petitioner, Dhananjay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 70 litres of liquor from a public water tank. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location did not belong to …
The petitioner, Rajesh Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 4 litres of liquor and 240 kg of Mahua flowers from two motorcycles. He argued that nothing was recovered from his …
The petitioners, Santu Noniya, Ranjan Kumar and Babi Devi, feared arrest in a criminal case (PS Case No. 218/2025) involving offences under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023. They asserted that they have clean antecedents and that the allegations of assault against them are vague and stem from a …
The petitioners, Yugeshwar Rai and Rangbaj Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018 for alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not arrested at the spot, the liquor was not …
The petitioner, Mahendra Chaudhary, applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 47(a)(f) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act alleging possession of 40 litres of liquor and 400 kg of fermented Jawa Mahua. He argued that the liquor was recovered from a joint family house, not from his …
The petitioner, Dilip Paswan, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor from a motorcycle and his joint‑family house. He argued that he was not in actual possession, was not the owner of the seized vehicle, and that the house …
The petitioner, Naim Shah, owner of a chicken shop in Kailash market, was implicated in the recovery of 64.5 litres of liquor from a premises adjacent to his shop under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, has a …
Sudama Sharma petitioned for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (Bidupur PS No. 542 of 2025) involving multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The informant alleged that Sharma, during a land‑related altercation at a construction site, assaulted him with a knife, causing …
The petitioner, Anshu Rajak, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging that liquor was recovered from a location adjacent to his house and that he was not arrested at the spot nor found in possession of the …
The petitioner, Sadab Faisal, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in an excise case involving the alleged recovery of 198 litres of liquor from his Ertiga vehicle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, and was unaware that …
The petitioner, Nago Kewat, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving the recovery of liquor, assault on police officers, and the freeing of a detainee, with charges under multiple sections of the B.N.S. and Section 45 of the Excise Act. He asserted that he has a clean …
Mukesh Rai applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged possession of 20 litres of liquor recovered from a scooty. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, did not have the scooty in his possession, …
The petitioner, Ranjeet Kumar Ray, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the BNS, 2023, including offences such as extortion and assault. He claimed he was falsely implicated, arguing that the FIR only specifically named other accused (Mukesh …
Lalu Kumar was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. He sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application after his arrest. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Birendra Kumar, requested the court’s leave to withdraw, and the State’s …
The petitioner, Jasim Akhtar, filed an anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Procedure Code. During the hearing on 20-01-2026, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead surrender to the authorities to seek regular bail. The …
The petitioner, Sanoj Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 8.7 litres of liquor and a motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, the seized items were not in his conscious possession, …
The petitioner, Sahaban Ansari, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S., 2023 relating to a land dispute in which he was alleged to have assaulted the informant. The petitioner asserted a clean record and claimed the allegations were false, noting …
The petitioner, Radheshyam, feared arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 414 and 34 and Bihar Excise Act sections 30(a) and 41(i) concerning the alleged recovery of 4,473 litres of liquor from a truck. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and is …
Basanti Devi, a government employee, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging offences under several sections of the BNS, stemming from a dispute with a neighbour who alleged an assault on her and her family. The petitioner argued she has a clean record, that the FIR was …
Jay Prakash Mahto applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 58.100 litres of liquor concealed behind the house of Umesh Panjiyar. The petitioner argued that he was …
The petitioners, four members of the Sah family, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes (BNS) and the POCSO Act, based on allegations by an informant that they assaulted her family members. The petitioners contended …
The petitioner, Sangita Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging possession of 30 litres of liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. She argued she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that the liquor was found in a joint family house, not in her …
Fantush Kumar (Viraj Kumar) applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act and Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, alleging recovery of 90 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, did not …
Shashi Kant Kumar, the owner of a vehicle from which 475.200 litres of liquor was seized, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor and was unaware that the vehicle was being used by others, Rajiv Kumar and Govinda …
The petitioner, Nirdosh Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 84 litres of liquor from a scooty, which he claims he did not possess nor own. He has five prior criminal cases, three under the excise law, and contends that the accusation is …
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of large quantities of liquor from two vehicles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, had a clean …
The petitioner, Md. Amzad Ali, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 1,999.180 litres of liquor from his residence, which is a joint family property. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and …
The petitioner, Niraj Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 316(1) and 318(4) of the B.N.S., 2023. He claimed a clean record and alleged that the informant, a relative, had falsely implicated him after a two‑day delay in filing the FIR. The petitioner argued that …
The petitioner, Suraj Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 420 litres of liquor. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the …
Nilam Devi, the wife of Ashok Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, where 25.98 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle she owned. She argued that she was not in possession of …
The petitioner, Bhawesh Paswan, filed an anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered at Mahishi Police Station, Saharsa. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and …
The petitioner, Abhishek Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 41(1) and 41(2) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of liquor from an open field, a truck and a motorcycle. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the …
The petitioner, Basant Singh, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with offences under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Excise Act, alleging that liquor was recovered from a vehicle he did not own and that he was not arrested on the spot. He …
The petitioner, Jayram Chaudhary, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 2.625 litres of liquor from his motorcycle and a bag. He argued that he has a clean …
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 41(1) and 41(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 2,517.120 litres of liquor from a truck and two pick‑up vehicles. He contended that he was not in …
Bikram Mahaldar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act read with Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleges that liquor, a motorcycle, a country‑made pistol and three live cartridges were recovered, but none were …
The petitioners, Nande Chaudhary and Kishun Chaudhary, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case alleging violation of Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Excise Act, 2018 for the alleged recovery of 35 litres of liquor from their jointly owned house. The …
Jay Kumar, the owner of a Tata Sumo, was implicated in a case (PS Case No‑192/2025) for the alleged recovery of 855 litres of liquor from his vehicle, alleged offences under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The …
The petitioner, Sanjay Ram, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 1.5 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was …
Sudama Gandharva, owner of a vehicle from which 2016 litres of liquor were seized, was charged under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing he had a clean record, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his driver misused the …
The petitioners, Bahadur Ray and Abhimanyu Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that liquor and raw fermented Jawa Mahua were recovered from the Ganga river bank and that they were implicated solely on the testimony …
The petitioner, Rupan Ray, owner of a Mahindra pickup, was implicated in the seizure of 561.6 litres of liquor and faced arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was unaware …
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar Choudhary, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle and that he was not caught in possession, …
The petitioner, Dilip Prasad, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 41(1) and 41(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 2,517.120 litres of liquor from a truck and two pick‑up vehicles. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, was not in …
The petitioner, Bablu Sah, filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case arising from Begusarai. He later approached the court seeking permission to withdraw that application and to surrender, with a view to obtain regular bail. The petitioner’s counsel argued for the withdrawal, while …
The petitioner, Seth Yadav, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 100 litres of liquor from the foothills of Chalho hill, where no liquor was found in his possession. He argued that the accusation was based on secret information and that the alleged …
Petitioner Raj Kumar Singh applied for anticipatory bail but was arrested while the application was pending. His counsel sought the court’s permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court considered whether a pending anticipatory bail petition could be withdrawn after arrest. It …
Petitioner Jawahir Sahani sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 300 litres of liquor and 800 litres of semi‑prepared liquor were seized from a public riverbank location not belonging to him. The petition argued that no …
The petitioners, Raju Mahto and Dharmveer Mahto, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and Section 30(a). They contended that the liquor allegedly recovered from their houses was part of joint family property, …
The petitioner, Rajesh Kushwaha, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 45 litres of liquor near Koiripatti waterfall. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location was public, and the …
Petitioner Buban Sahni sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, alleging that the alleged liquor recovery was from a public riverbank and that he had no conscious possession. He contended that the complaint was …
Manoj Sahani sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under IPC sections 272 and 273 and the Bihar Excise Act sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) alleging possession of 5 litres of liquor and 5,000 litres of raw Jawa Mahua. The petitioner argued that he was not caught in the act, nothing …
Petitioner Rajesh Nut was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 400 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He claimed he was not in possession of the vehicle and that the complaint originated from a chowkidar, questioning the police …
The petitioner, Dhanjit Singh, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 182.42 litres of liquor from his Hyundai car and motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession at the …
Petitioner Rajan Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 19,500 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious possession of the …
The petitioner, Sushil Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 300.9 litres of liquor from his Scorpio vehicle and a flour mill. He contended that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession and that he was unaware of his …
The petitioner, Tinku Rai, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 210 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He asserted that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, was not the vehicle's owner, and was falsely …
The petitioner, Intiya Devi, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered against her under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged possession of liquor. She argued that the liquor was recovered from a joint family house, she had no conscious …
Ashok Rai, the owner of a pickup vehicle, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 1,058.73 litres of liquor were recovered from his vehicle. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being transported, that the driver and attendant misused …
Mukesh Mukhiya was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 18 litres of liquor from his motorcycle, invoking Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the BNS read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that …
The petitioner, Vishal Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that he was implicated in the recovery of 27 litres of liquor from a motorcycle despite having no prior criminal record and no possession of the …
The petitioner, Jatashankar Mukhiya, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a public place. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the recovery site did …
The petitioner, Raushan Sahni, applied for anticipatory bail after being apprehended in a case involving alleged recovery of 375 ml of liquor from a motorcycle and multiple offences under the B.N.S., 2023 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not …
Ravi Soni applied for anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging that 25.02 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle linked to him. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, did not have the liquor in his conscious possession, and was not …
The petitioners, three residents of Bhairopur, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor from land not belonging to them. They argued that no liquor was found in their possession and that the FIR did not …
The petitioner, Ritesh Vishwakarma, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for the alleged recovery of 207 litres of liquor from his vehicle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not present at the time of seizure, and was …
Sudama Devi, the wife of Hitesh Singh, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the recovery of 15 litres of liquor, a country-made pistol and three live cartridges from her husband's house. The petitioner argued that she was not …
Vijay Singh Yadav, owner of a pickup vehicle, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for the alleged recovery of 388.96 litres of liquor from his vehicle. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the …
The petitioner, Madhu Devi, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 17.5 litres of liquor from a scooty she owned. She argued that she had no prior criminal record, was not in possession …
The petitioner, Gaurav Mendiratta, sought anticipatory bail after a police case was registered alleging that 341.28 litres of liquor were recovered from a car he owned, invoking Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code and several provisions of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016‑18. He contended …
The petitioner, Alok Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 15 litres of liquor in a seized motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession at the …
The petitioner, Saurav Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in an excise case involving alleged recovery of 712.501 litres of liquor from two vehicles. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the seized vehicles, and was implicated solely on a confessional …
Manish Kumar Yadav was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2016 for allegedly possessing 324 litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in his conscious …
The petitioner, Chhabila Nut, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, for alleged possession of liquor recovered from two locations and his joint‑family house. He argued that no liquor was found in his immediate possession, the house is …
The petitioner, a village Mukhiya, was implicated in a case alleging misappropriation of Rs.43,79,850 and charged under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023. She applied for anticipatory bail, asserting a clean antecedent, that the allegations were false, and that an inquiry report by the D.D.C. …
The petitioner, Purushottam Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of five litres of codeine cough syrup. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no contraband …
The petitioner, Rakesh Das, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 557.730 litres of liquor from his house and a vehicle. He argued that he has a clean …
Petitioner Nikhat Praveen, a village Mukhiya, was implicated in a case alleging misappropriation of Rs.43,79,850 and charged under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023. She applied for anticipatory bail, asserting a clean antecedent, that the allegations were false, and that an inquiry report by the …
The petitioner, Kamlesh Paswan, was implicated in a case (PS Case No. 98 of 2025) for alleged recovery of 75 litres of liquor from a kiln, invoking Sections 191(2), 190, 115(2), 126(2) and 132 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act. He applied …
Satendra Chaudhary sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where police alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he did not own. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was …
The petitioner, Bamb Shankar Baitha, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of 284.1 litres of liquor from a straw house not owned by him. He argued …
The petitioner, Raju Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly recovering 30 litres of liquor from a field adjacent to his house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in his possession, and …
The petitioner, Hajari Ray, was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 45 litres of liquor from his motorcycle, an offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He sought anticipatory bail, arguing he had a clean record and was unaware that his friend misused his …
The petitioner, Sandeep Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging recovery of 303 litres of liquor from a car he owned, under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3) of the B.N.S and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018. He contended that he had a clean …
The petitioner, Bishwanath Mukhiya, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from the Gandak river and 300 litres of liquor‑manufacturing liquid, which were destroyed. He argued that no …
The petitioners, five residents of Ghusiya Kala, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022. An informant alleged that four to five intoxicated …
The petitioners, who are the mother, father, sister and brother of the accused Chandan, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 376 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. They alleged that the complainant had a consensual …
The petitioner, Bachcha Prasad Kushwaha, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(c) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 2,498.34 litres of liquor from a truck and a motorcycle. He argued that he was not present at the spot of seizure, did …
The petitioner, Dinesh Mukhiya, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 50 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, …
Paspati Devi, a 74‑year‑old woman with a clean record, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case registered under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, relating to alleged dowry‑related torture and murder. The petitioner argued that the informant was not an …
The petitioner, Shushil Sahni, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 432 litres of liquor from a jungle. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession, the alleged site did not belong to him, and the case …
Petitioner Mangaru Bind applied for anticipatory bail under the Criminal Procedure Code. While the application was pending, he was arrested. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court, after hearing both sides, granted permission to withdraw. …
The petitioner, Virendar Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 14.760 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not the owner of the motorcycle, nothing was seized from his possession, and the …
Mannu Chaudhari applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Sections 30(a), 41 and 47 of the Excise Act, alleging that liquor was recovered from a joint family house and that no liquor was found in his conscious possession. The …
The petitioner, Rajesh Dhangad, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 49 litres of liquor from an under‑construction house belonging to his brother Koriman Dhangad. He asserted a clean antecedent, no possession of …
The petitioner, Ravindra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging recovery of 2,880 litres of liquor from his Mahindra Bolero vehicle under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he …
Vinod Yadav was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, that the vehicle was merely owned by him, and that he was unaware of any misuse by a third …
The petitioner, Nitu Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor from her residence. She argued she has a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession, and the house is joint family property, making …
The petitioner, Binod Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(c) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 14 litres of liquor in a seized motorcycle. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession and that he was unaware …
The petitioner, Anil Kumar, feared arrest in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 and the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, alleging that liquor was recovered from vehicles not in his possession and that he was implicated solely on secret information. He contended that he was …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 897.15 litres of liquor from a truck he owned. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure and was unaware that his vehicle would be used …
The petitioner, Tamanna Khan, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 432 litres of liquor from a riverbank. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the location was public, …
The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, had been granted anticipatory bail on 19‑January‑2026. During the hearing, counsel pointed out a discrepancy in the village name, claiming the order mistakenly recorded “Ismailpur” instead of “Ismailchak”. The court examined the order and found that the village name …
Rampari Devi and Mahesh Paswan applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging possession of 52 litres of liquor under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not arrested at the scene, and the liquor was found in a joint family house, making it uncertain that …
The petitioners, Ragani Kumari and Raju Devi, were arrested in connection with an FIR (PS‑67/2024) alleging offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506 and 34. They contend they have clean antecedents, are women, and were falsely implicated because the FIR specifically names Santosh and …
The petitioner, Md. Feroz Alam, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous case. During the hearing on 19 January 2026, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and to surrender to the authorities …
Anand Kumar sought relief from arrest in connection with PS case No.126 of 2024, which alleged offences under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 30(a), 32(ii), 32(iii) and 36 of the Bihar Excise Act. He had earlier obtained a provisional anticipatory bail …
The petitioners, Anish Ray and Mannu Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 559.200 litres of liquor from a vehicle they did not own. They argued that no liquor was found in their possession and that the only …
Chhotu Kumar, the owner of a car from which 400 litres of liquor was seized, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 32(B) of the Excise Act. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the …
Guddu Choudhary applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor from his joint family house. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, the liquor was not in his …
The petitioner, Shyam Babu, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that the alleged liquor recovery was from a public place and not in his possession. He argued that the police were mechanically …
The petitioner applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 500 ml of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest and was …
The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar Das, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 114.120 litres of liquor from his joint family house. The petitioner asserted a clean antecedent, no arrest, and …
The petitioner, Parmanand Thakur, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37(A) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of six litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He asserted that he had a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in his conscious possession and that he was unaware …
Pawan Mukhiya applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of 171 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious …
The petitioner, Rajkishor Purvey, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, alleging that liquor was recovered from a government school and that he had no possession or direct involvement. He argued that the complaint …
The petitioner, Dhiraj Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 4.875 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, that the …
The petitioner, Anjani Chauhan, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor and jawa mahua from the Sone river. The petitioner argued that no liquor …
Prince Kumar Rai, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 51.84 litres of liquor from a sack. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the alleged recovery occurred at a location not …
The petitioner, Bhim Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 60 litres of liquor from a paddy field not belonging to him. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location was communal, and …
Manjula Devi applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC Sections 272, 273 and 34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged possession of liquor recovered from her house, which is a joint family property. She argued she …
The petitioner, Ajit Paswan, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the house is a joint family property, and the 2018 …
The petitioners, five residents of Mahadeva village in Rohtas district, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018/2022 for allegedly possessing 45 litres of liquor and 1,000 litres of Mahua …
The petitioner, Santosh Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 14.975 litres of liquor, of which 2.6 litres were said to have been found in his house, a joint‑family property. He argued that no …
Laljee Prasad, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 after 49.5 litres of liquor was recovered from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the …
The petitioner, Amar Singh, sought anticipatory bail after the police alleged that liquor amounting to 861.5 litres was recovered from his dalan and 846.87 litres from a neighbour’s house, invoking Sections 30(a), 36 and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that the liquor was not in his immediate …
The petitioner, Sadam Alam, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 846 litres of liquor from a public field. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the alleged recovery site …
The petitioner, Aadarsh Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 21.620 litres of liquor from a location not belonging to him. He has three prior criminal cases, two of which are also under the excise …
The petitioner, Bablu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act alleging recovery of 1,313.280 litres of liquor from a boat. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no liquor in his possession, and was implicated …
Mithu Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. The allegation involved recovery of 70 litres of liquor from a location near Nayka Tola temple, …
Vijay Chauhan applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor and fermented mahua. The petitioner asserted that he has a clean antecedent and that the …
The petitioner, Doman Tuddu, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of 12 litres of liquor from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no …
The petitioner sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of five litres of liquor. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession, the FIR omitted the informant’s name, and the investigation was mechanically …
Mukesh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 300 litres of liquor from three motorcycles. The petitioner argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, that the vehicles were owned by him but …
Ashish Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case alleging offences under Sections 30(a), 30(c) and 30(d) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of liquor and mahua flowers from his residence and that of another person. The …
The petitioner, Bhola Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic/Excise Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of 20 litres of liquor from his residence. He contended that the liquor was …
The petitioner, Raju Kumar Manjhi, was implicated in a kidnapping (Sec. 363 IPC) and criminal intimidation (Sec. 366 IPC) case based on an FIR filed on 1 June 2022 concerning an alleged incident on 4 November 2021. He contended that he has a clean record, the allegation was false, and the FIR was …
The petitioners, Amit Kumar Yadav and Sudarshan Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, relating to alleged recovery of liquor and raw wine. They argued they have clean …
Munna Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 105 litres of liquor from his residence, which he claims is a joint family property and that he had no conscious possession. He argued that the 2018 amendment to …
The petitioner, Bhim Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not …
Vikash Ram sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 40 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that he had no conscious possession, the liquor was stored in a family property, and the 2018 amendment to the …
Vikash Rai applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 86.175 litres of liquor from a wheat field. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not found in his possession, the location did not belong to him, and the FIR …
Petitioner Gayatri Devi was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, one of which she owned. She argued that she had no conscious possession of the liquor, had a clean antecedent, and was unaware of any …
The petitioners, Sumit Kumar and Arun Kumar, were implicated in a case involving the alleged recovery of 27.9 liters of liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. Sumit Kumar was arrested during the pendency of his anticipatory bail application, which was subsequently withdrawn with the …
The petitioner, Ganesh Sahni, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a), 30(c) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act relating to the recovery of 110 litres of liquor and 690 litres of fermented Jawa Mahua from the house of his brother‑in‑law, …
The petitioners, Saddam Hussain and Janarul, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the B.N.S. They argued that the allegations, stemming from a political dispute over voting, were false and that the injury report contradicted the claim of a stabbing. …
Sikandar Kumar Choudhary, the owner of a vehicle from which 750 ml of liquor was recovered, was charged under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act. He was not arrested at the spot and did not have the liquor in his conscious possession; the allegation was based solely on his ownership of …
The petitioner, Mithun Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 317(5), 303(2), 317(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. He claimed he was falsely implicated, stating that the informant’s cultivator was stolen and three accused, after being caught, named …
The petitioners, Anmol Kumar and Niket Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple offences of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, arising from a property dispute and alleged assault. They contended that they were falsely implicated, that the informant was a relative …
Swati Jha was arrested while her anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. Her counsel requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application after the arrest. The court considered the request and granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory …
Ravi Kumar, a resident of Gaurichak, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR alleging extortion and assault on a fruit seller and his family. The petitioner argued that he has a clean record and that the allegations against him are vague and omnibus, with the main thrust of the …
The petitioner, Pankaj Kumar Jha, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. During the hearing, his counsel sought permission to withdraw the application, stating the petitioner would surrender and apply for regular bail. The Court granted permission to withdraw and …
The petitioner, Roshan Saw, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act after 1,170 litres of liquor were recovered from a truck he owned, though the liquor was not found in his possession and the driver fled the scene. He asserted that he had a clean antecedent and was …
Amrit Adhikari applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 32(3) and 56(b) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 906.84 litres of liquor from his pickup vehicle. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, the liquor was not in his conscious possession and …
The petitioner, Ajay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 142.560 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the seized …
The petitioners, Chandan Kumar and Mohan Kumar Ray, were implicated in a case under Sections 274, 275 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and Section 30(a) of its Amendment Act for allegedly recovering 170 litres of spirit and 2 litres of spurious liquor from a house not belonging to them. They …
