Created by Fuzzy Cloud

SATYAVRAT VERMA

5892 judgments · newest first · showing 5001–5200

Pappu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pappu Kumar, was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 160 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in his vehicle and that no liquor was found in his immediate possession, emphasizing his clean criminal …

Vinod RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vinod Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 180 litres of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was not found in his possession, and the recovery occurred at a …

Krishan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Krishan Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 76.83 litres of liquor from his vehicle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of …

Raushan Yadav @ Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Petitioner Raushan Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No. 183/2025) involving offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 351(1), 351(2), 352, 109(1) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, …

Durga Chaudhary @ Durga Kumar ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Durga Chaudhary and Milan Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that the liquor was recovered from a location not belonging to them and that the case is based solely on a confessional statement made by an accused in police …

Sanjay MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjay Mandal, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 12 litres of liquor from a joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the house being a joint …

Radhakant Ray @ Radha Kant RoyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Radhakant Ray, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of six litres of liquor from his kiosk. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession and that a customer, not the petitioner, had concealed it, …

Md. AshadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Ashad, was implicated in a case for the alleged recovery of 198 litres of liquor from a Scorpio vehicle he owned, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. He sought anticipatory bail, arguing that he was not present at the seizure, had no conscious …

Dhaneshwar PanditversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dhaneshwar Pandit, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 128.625 litres of liquor from an e‑rickshaw. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was seized from his possession, he was not the vehicle's owner, and the …

Laxman NatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three brothers from Harpur Karah, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor recovered from a bamboo orchard, a motorcycle, a bolero vehicle and from two other individuals. They argued they …

Arun NutversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Arun Nut and Sudha Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where liquor was allegedly recovered from various locations and vehicles. They argued they had clean antecedents, were not in possession of the seized liquor, and …

JaipalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Jaipal, the owner of a Scorpio vehicle from which 320.580 litres of liquor was seized, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. for alleged offences under Sections 30(a), 32(ii) and 41(i) of the Excise Act. He argued that he was not present at the spot of seizure, had no …

Shivpati DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shivpati Devi, a woman with no prior criminal record, feared arrest after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 20 litres of liquor found near her hut. The petitioner argued that the liquor was recovered from a …

Bouwa Mukhiya @ Baua MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bouwa Mukhiya, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 15 litres of liquor found in a room adjacent to his courtyard. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and that the …

Javed AliversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Javed Ali, the owner of a bus, was implicated in a case where 1522.92 litres of liquor were recovered from the vehicle, leading to charges under Sections 30(a), 32(i)(ii), 36 and 41(i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016-18. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that he had a clean …

Dadan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Dadan Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged offences under the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act, the Arms Act, and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act. The FIR alleged recovery of liquor and cartridges, and that the accused fired …

Anjali DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Anjali Devi, the petitioner, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 21 litres of liquor from a public area adjacent to a railway track and 15 litres from an open field. She contended that she had no prior criminal record, that the liquor was …

Mukesh Rai @ Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Kumar RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Rai, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 5,257.065 litres of liquor from three vehicles. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the liquor, and was not the …

Ranjeet SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjeet Sahni, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) and Bihar Excise Act sections 30(a)(c)(d) for alleged recovery of 222.5 litres of liquor from a river bank. He argued that the liquor was not in his …

Hakim AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Hakim Ansari, was involved in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding before the Patna High Court. He filed a modification application in the case and later approached the court seeking to withdraw that application. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested permission to withdraw, …

Manoj Rai @ Manoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Rai, the owner of a tractor, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 1,656.7 liters of liquor from several vehicles. He contended that he was not present at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his …

Om Prakash RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Om Prakash Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 3.5 litres of liquor from a Safari car. He contended that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and …

Pramila DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Petitioner Pramila Devi feared arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. She had earlier filed an anticipatory bail application (Cr. Misc. No. 20847/2022) which she later withdrew. She subsequently filed a second anticipatory bail application (Cr. Misc. …

Ganga Prasad MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ganga Prasad Mahto, was implicated in a case concerning the seizure of 607.68 litres of liquor and two motorcycles under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, 2018. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, and was unaware …

PINTU YADAV @ RAJESH KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pintu Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged seizure of 5,706.36 litres of liquor from a truck. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the vehicle owner, and was implicated …

Pappu Yadav @ Pappu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pappu Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 6.400 litres of liquor from a Scorpio vehicle he owned. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession and that he was unaware his father, Harendra Yadav, …

Ashok SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ashok Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 279 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He asserted a clean criminal record, denied ownership of the seized vehicle, and claimed he was …

Lalita Devi @ Lalati DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Lalita Devi applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging that the alleged seizure of 65 litres of liquor was from the house of Baby Devi, not her possession. She asserted a clean …

Ramlakhan ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramlakhan Choudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for alleged recovery of 153 litres of liquor from a public bush near an embankment. He contended that the liquor was not in …

Harilal SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Harilal Sah, a resident of Siwan, sought anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under IPC sections 272, 273, 34 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 (sections 30(a), 38(i), 41(i)) for the alleged recovery of 2,220.48 litres of liquor from a car and …

Shantosh Tiwari @ Santosh Tiwari @ Santosh Kumar TiwariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shantosh Tiwari sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018‑22. He has six prior criminal cases, five under the Excise Act, and is alleged to have been involved in the recovery of large quantities of liquor from a …

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 36 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 270 litres of liquor from a gunny bag on four motorcycles. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, did not own the vehicles, and …

Rajeev Ranjan @ Raju Ranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajeev Ranjan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 700 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a house belonging to Asha Devi, not the petitioner. He argued that the recovery was based …

Suraj PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Suraj Paswan and Aditya Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that the liquor recovered was not in their possession and the location was public. They argued that the investigation relied on secret information …

Ritesh BhagatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ritesh Bhagat, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 207 litres of liquor from a bush not in his possession. He argued that the complaint originated from a chowkidar without prior police information and …

Sandeep Singh @ Sandeep Kumar SinghversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sandeep Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in an excise case involving alleged recovery of 1,252.8 litres of liquor from various vehicles. He argued that he was not in possession of the seized liquor, did not own the vehicles, and his implication rested solely on a …

Kakulati DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Kakulati Devi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that liquor was recovered from a joint family house without her personal possession. She argued that the 2018 …

Kali Rai @ Raj Kishor RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kali Rai, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 160.56 litres of liquor from an orchard he does not own and from which nothing was seized in his possession. He contended that he was implicated solely on secret information without …

Vijay YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vijay Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for the alleged recovery of 192.75 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal …

Ashlok ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ashlok Manjhi, a resident of Goha village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC Sections 272 and 273 and Bihar Excise Act Sections 30(a), 38 and 42 for allegedly recovering 450 litres of liquor from a tractor. He contended that he was not present at the spot of …

Ravindra RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravindra Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of 140 litres of liquor and 2000 litres of mahua from a public riverbank. He argued …

Md. Abu NasarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Abu Nasar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 118.320 litres of liquor from his Swift Dzire vehicle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was unaware …

Arun YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Arun Yadav sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging that 67.5 litres of liquor were recovered from a public bush, not from his possession. He argued that the alleged recovery site did not belong to him, the informant’s name was …

Upendra ChaudhariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Upendra Chaudhari, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 24 litres of liquor recovered from his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the house is joint family property, and the confession of his …

Ravi Ojha @ Rabi OjhaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Ravi Ojha, the owner of a truck, was implicated in the seizure of 4,359.6 litres of liquor near Narmada Warehouse. He was not arrested at the spot and the liquor was not found in his conscious possession; the allegation is that his driver misused the vehicle. The petitioner, who has a …

Golu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Golu Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of large quantities of liquor. He asserted a clean criminal record, argued that the alleged liquor was recovered from a location not under his …

Md. SajeedversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Sajeed, sought anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under Sections 30(a), 30(c), 30(d), 32(3), 41(a) and 41(b) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 280 litres of spirit and 4.68 litres of liquor from a closed …

Md. JahidversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Md. Jahid, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. He later sought permission to withdraw that application and to surrender to the trial court to seek regular bail. The learned counsel argued for withdrawal, and the court granted the request. The …

Ajay YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Ajay Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 109, 132, 324(4) of the B.N.S., 2023, Sections 27, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018. The …

Ajay Kumar @ Ajay PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ajay Kumar filed a petition seeking restoration of Criminal Miscellaneous No. 74272 of 2025, which had been removed from the court's file. The petitioner argued that the grounds for removal were not valid and that the case should be reinstated. The State of Bihar opposed the restoration, contending …

Akhilesh RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Akhilesh Rai, applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 360.92 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and …

Govind KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Govind Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 79864 of 2025, which was granted by the Patna High Court on 12 January 2025. A subsequent modification application was rejected on 17 January 2026, but the order mistakenly recorded the bail grant date as 12‑1‑2025 …

Guddu Yadav @ Guddu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Guddu Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that the alleged seizure of 300 litres of liquor was from a premises not belonging to him and that he had no direct involvement. The …

Subodh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Subodh Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that 103.200 litres of liquor were recovered from two motorcycles not owned by him. He argued that the seizure was not from his conscious …

Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vikash Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged alleging his involvement in the recovery of 2,142 litres of liquor from five vehicles, offences punishable under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise …

Vivek Sharma @ Vivekanand SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vivek Sharma, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged possession of 114.48 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle and a bag. He contended …

Gulshan Singh @ Gulshan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gulshan Singh, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act alleging recovery of 703.125 litres of liquor from a public toilet. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the liquor, …

Amrit Chauhan @ Pahari @ Sudhanshu RanjanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Amrit Chauhan sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case involving alleged recovery of 1,260 litres of liquor and offences under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that no liquor was found in his …

Prem Vaibhav @ BittuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Prem Vaibhav, filed a second anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court after an earlier application (Cr. Misc. No. 51783 of 2025) had been withdrawn. The petitioner argued that the second application should be entertained. The State opposed the application. The Court …

Radhe MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Radhe Mahto, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 304B, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the alleged dowry‑related murder of his sister‑in‑law. He claimed to have a clean record and argued that he could not have informed the informant of the killing, suggesting the …

Surendra Paswan @ Surendra RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Surendra Paswan, sought regular bail in a criminal case involving offences under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code. He had previously been granted provisional anticipatory bail, which was later cancelled by the trial court after an injury report deemed the injury grievous. The …

Md. IslamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md Islam, was arrested in connection with a case alleging conspiracy to murder and offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act. The informant claimed that the petitioner’s brother was involved in a plot to kill a relative and that the petitioner was part of the …

Dhananjay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dhananjay Kumar, a government servant, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a murder case under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act. The allegations stemmed from an informant's claim that the petitioner had conspired to have the …

Ejaj Shah @ Ejaj AhamadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ejaj Shah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act. The informant alleged that his son had recorded a conspiracy by several persons to kill the informant, and that the planning allegedly took …

Jayant KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Jayant Kumar applied for regular bail in a criminal miscellaneous case involving alleged offences under Sections 109(1) and 61(2) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner argued that he was not named in the FIR, his name only surfaced during investigation based on a mobile number …

Asgar Hussain Ansari @ Asgar AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ejaj Shah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act. The informant alleged that his son had recorded a conspiracy by several persons to kill the informant, and that the planning allegedly took …

Raju SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raju Singh, was not named in the FIR but was implicated because his tractor was found loaded with sand allegedly extracted by a sand mafia. He faces potential arrest under multiple sections of the Bihar Nagar Sand (BNSS) Act, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner argued …

Bijendra JhaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bijendra Jha, a junior engineer, was implicated in an FIR dated 18‑08‑2022 alleging fraud involving Rs 57,27,553 related to work in the Madhepura Vidhan Sabha constituency for FY 2014‑15, with charges under IPC sections 420, 409, 467 and 468. Jha contended that the primary accused, …

Chhotu Pandey @ Barun kumar PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Chhotu Pandey and Raj Kumar Pandey applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act, 2023, alleging assault on the informant's son and others. They contended they have clean antecedents and that the …

Raushan Yadav @ Raushan RajversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raushan Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 32(2)(3) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 510.375 litres of liquor and seizure of three motorcycles. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, …

Bali NutversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Bali Nut, accused of offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, had earlier been granted provisional anticipatory bail subject to verification of his criminal antecedents. The verification revealed eight prior cases, leading to cancellation of …

Anuj Singh @ Anuj Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anuj Singh, was implicated in a case under IPC Sections 272 and 273 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act Sections 30(a), 38 and 42 for allegedly possessing 450 litres of spirit in a tractor. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious possession, and was not …

Nira DeviversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Nira Devi, the wife of Bibhay Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition seeking cancellation of the anticipatory bail that had been granted to her husband on 12 July 2023. The petition was based on the husband's alleged failure to pay the monthly maintenance of Rs.4,000 ordered by the court on …

Md. Serajuddin @ Md. Seraj @ SirajuddinversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Md. Serajuddin, had filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case. During the pendency of that application, he voluntarily surrendered before the trial court. The petitioner then sought the court's permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The learned …

Laiba Fariyal @ Laiba FarihalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Laiba Fariyal sought anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against her under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. Although the police had taken cognizance of the offence based on the charge sheet, they had not arrested her and she had cooperated with the …

Guddu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Guddu Singh, the petitioner, applied for bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 168 litres of liquor. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the scene, no liquor was found in his possession, and the case was based solely on a confessional …

Bali NutversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Bali Nut was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He had earlier obtained provisional anticipatory bail conditioned on verification of his criminal antecedents, claiming only two cases, but the verification revealed eight antecedents, leading to cancellation of that …

Aslam AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three members of the Ansari family, were arrested in connection with a violent incident alleged to have occurred on the eve of Muharram, where the informant's son was reportedly stabbed. They sought regular bail for offences under Sections 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 351(2) …

Vijay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vijay Kumar was arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly possessing 35.4 litres of liquor at his brother Sanjay Kumar’s house, which is a joint family property. The petitioner, who has a clean antecedent, argued that he was not in …

Dharmendra Ray @ Dharmendra RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dharmendra Ray, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging that 50 litres of liquor were recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, that the vehicle belonged to him, and that he was unaware of his friend's …

Shyambabu SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shyambabu Sah applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 35 litres of liquor from a house that is part of a joint family property. The petitioner …

Sonu Kumar @ Sonu NutversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Sonu Kumar and Govind Nut, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, for alleged recovery of liquor near their residence. They applied for anticipatory bail, asserting that the liquor was not in their possession and that the FIR …

Manish Kumar Singh @ Manish SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manish Kumar Singh applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 70 litres of liquor from a boat. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had …

Pawan Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pawan Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 324 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He argued that nothing was seized from his possession and the case was based …

Jitendra Kumar @ Jitendra Singh @ Jhullan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Jitendra Kumar and Laljeet Singh, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from a seized motorcycle. They argued that they have clean antecedents, were not in possession of the liquor at the time of …

Satendra ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Satendra Chaudhary sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 7.4 litres of liquor from a public area in Videshi tola. He argued that the liquor was not in his …

Pintu Poddar @ Pintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pintu Poddar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning alleged possession of 25 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not caught in possession and that the case against him relied solely on a …

Heera Lal Manjhi @ Heera ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Heera Lal Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act, where liquor was allegedly recovered from his house and other premises. He argued that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, that the house is …

Pintu RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pintu Rai, owner of a vehicle from which 550.56 litres of liquor were seized, sought anticipatory bail alleging he was not present at the spot and had no conscious possession of the liquor. He has four prior cases under the Bihar Excise Act. The State opposed the bail. The Court granted …

Sangita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sangita Devi Dhani Lal Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 14 litres of spirit from her joint‑family house. She argued that the liquor was not in her conscious possession, …

Shushant Sharma @ Rabsan SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shushant Sharma, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 36 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a motorcycle not owned by him. He argued that the only evidence against him was a …

Kunkun SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kunkun Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 816 litres of liquor from a Mahendra pickup. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the …

Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Kumar, the owner of a pick‑up vehicle, was implicated in a case (PS Case No‑154/2025) for the alleged recovery of 531 litres of liquor, an offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. The petitioner argued that he had a clean antecedent, …

Nagendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Nagendra Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous case. The court granted him a week to rectify certain defects in the application, but the defects remained unrectified. The petitioner subsequently sought permission to withdraw the …

Mahendra Manjhi @ Manish ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

Mahendra Manjhi applied for anticipatory bail in a criminal miscellaneous case. The Registry had identified defects in the application and granted the petitioner two weeks to rectify them, but the defects were not remedied. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, leading the court to infer …

Praduman Kumar SawversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellant, Praduman Kumar Saw, was charged under several IPC provisions, the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the Information Technology Act for allegedly sending obscene photographs of the informant to her husband and threatening her. He applied for …

Rajneeti Kunwar @ Lalan KunwarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Rajneeti Kunwar and Babita Devi, sought anticipatory bail in a dowry‑related case (Criminal Misc. No.74341 of 2025) alleging false implication. The FIR alleged that the victim was assaulted by her husband and other family members, but the petitioners argued that the husband and …

Rishav Raj @ Rishav KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Rishav Raj, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving alleged assault on a lady police officer during a police operation. He claimed the allegations were exaggerated, that he only intervened to protect his family, and that the injury to the informant …

Nirmala Devi @ Nirmala KumariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Nirmala Devi, a government school teacher, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a dowry‑related homicide case registered under Sections 80(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The informant, the victim's mother‑in‑law, alleged that the petitioner and other family members demanded dowry and …

Ravi Raj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Ravi Raj Kumar and Bijendra Kumar, were accused of overloading a sand‑laden truck in violation of Sections 318(4), 303(2), 317(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023. They contended that the sand had a valid mining challan and that the total weight of the truck (41,070 kg) was below its …

Vinod ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, six members of the Manjhi family, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in an FIR alleging assault on an informant on 1 August 2025. They argued they have clean antecedents and that the FIR is vague, with inconsistencies regarding the informant’s statement and the timeline …

MANISH KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manish Kumar and Gaurav Kumar, brothers, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes (BNSS) 2023. They claim they were falsely implicated by a neighbour with whom they have a land dispute, and that the alleged assault …

Shiv shankar SahuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shiv Shankar Sahu, an 18‑year‑old student, applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging assault, pouring hot oil, and theft under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes. He claimed a clean antecedent and that the incident was accidental, arising from a dispute at his mother’s tea …

Rajesh Bhagat @ Rajesh MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, Rajesh Bhagat and Awadhesh Bhagat, applied for anticipatory bail in a case where police recovered 107 kg of ganja from a bush on the basis of a secret informant's tip. The petitioners claimed they have clean antecedents, were not present at the scene, and were falsely implicated by …

Umesh Kumar Mandal @ Umesh MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Umesh Kumar Mandal, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, stemming from an alleged assault and threat to demolish a house over a land dispute. He asserted a clean antecedent …

Bhikhar DasversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bhikhar Das, a 70‑year‑old man with a clean record, was implicated in an assault case arising from a Holi program on 14‑03‑2025, alleged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 110 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He contended that the FIR, filed on 16‑03‑2025, was based on a false …

Birendra Kumar MishraversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Birendra Kumar Mishra, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging recovery of 20.25 litres of liquor from two vehicles, one of which he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was unaware of the misuse of …

Munna Kumar @ Munna Kumar MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Munna Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, where 25 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, …

Karan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Karan Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 192 litres of liquor. He argued that the liquor was recovered from a location not belonging …

Ashok Paswan @ Ashok Kumar PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ashok Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 30(d), 30(f), 33 and 34 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, relating to alleged recovery of spirits and liquor from a motorcycle and a shop. He argued that the seized items were not in his …

Girija DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Girija Devi, a woman with a clean antecedent, sought anticipatory bail after the police alleged that 20.1 litres of liquor were recovered from her house in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. She argued that the house is joint family property, she had no conscious …

Divya PrakashversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Divya Prakash filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from an excise matter. The petitioner, through counsel, later sought permission to withdraw that application and instead surrender to the trial court to seek regular bail. The High Court examined whether …

Parshotam SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Parshotam Singh feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 144 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He asserted he had sold the vehicle before the incident and had no conscious possession of the liquor, and he possessed a clean criminal record. …

Pawan Yadav @ Pawan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pawan Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 57.03 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from public premises and not from his possession. He argued that the investigation was mechanically …

Kaushalaya Devi @ Sarita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Kaushalaya Devi sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned. She argued that she was not in possession of the liquor, was unaware of …

zafirversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Zafir, was facing an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case arising from PS Jokihat, Araria. He approached the High Court seeking permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application and to surrender to the trial court for regular bail. The learned counsel for the …

Pucho Paswan @ Fucho PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pucho Paswan applied for anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 60 litres of liquor from a straw house on his premises. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested, and that the liquor …

Chandrama Kumar @ Durdara @ DurduraversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Chandrama Kumar, accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 45 litres of mahua from an auto, sought anticipatory bail claiming he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the seized goods, and was implicated solely on a confessional statement of another …

Bikki Manjhi @ Bikki KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bikki Manjhi, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 14 litres of liquor recovered from a joint family house. He argued that he had no conscious possession, the liquor was part of joint family property, and the only evidence was …

Ankaj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ankaj Kumar, a resident of a joint family house in Lakhisarai, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 10 litres of liquor recovered from his home. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, that no liquor was found in his conscious possession, and …

Anshu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anshu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in an excise case (Sections 30(a) and 56(2) of the Bihar Excise Act) for allegedly recovering 150 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not apprehended at the spot, and the …

Dhoni KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Dhoni Kumar and Neelam Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, alleging that the liquor recovered was not in their possession and that the informant’s name was omitted from the FIR. They argued that …

Kundan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 24.9 litres of liquor from his residence, a joint family property. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, that the …

Md. Naeem @ Naeem MansuriversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Naeem Mansuri, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic and S... Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 15 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he …

Sunny Rai @ Sunny KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunny Rai, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 2,944.9 litres of liquor from a warehouse he does not own. He argued that the only evidence against him was a confessional statement made by a …

Vinod Yadav @ Vidiyo Sahab @ Vinod PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petition involved two accused, Vinod Yadav and Baiju Kumar, arrested in connection with an alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. Baiju Kumar sought anticipatory bail but was arrested during the pendency of his application; the court permitted him to …

Rupesh Kumar GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Rupesh Kumar Gupta and his son Akash Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 61.38 litres of liquor from their residence. They argued that they have …

Rinku DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rinku Devi applied for anticipatory bail after learning that she might be arrested in a case alleging possession of six litres of liquor under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. She argued that she has a clean …

Ritesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Ritesh Kumar and Sonelal Ray, feared arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 900 ml of liquor from a mango orchard near their residence. They argued that the liquor was not in their …

Baulal Kumar @ Babulal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Baulal Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from his motorcycle and another 15 litres from the house of Lakhan Marandi. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in …

Mukesh SaoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mukesh Sao, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor recovered from a motorcycle and a sack belonging to another person. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, that the liquor was …

Deepak Kumar @ Deepak PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 90.615 litres of liquor were recovered from a bamboo orchard belonging to Harendra Sahani, with no material found in the petitioner's possession. He …

Aditay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Aditay Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 70 litres of liquor and a motorcycle from the Falgu river. He argued that the alleged contraband was not seized from his possession, the …

Kishan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kishan Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 69.3 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not …

Ashok MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Ashok Mahto and Mukesh Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for alleged possession of liquor recovered from a joint family house. They argued they have clean antecedents, the liquor was not in …

Rajnish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajnish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 10.125 litres of liquor from a straw house. He argued he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and the straw house does …

Raj KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raj Kumari, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 1,460.040 litres of liquor from a Tata Magic vehicle she owned. She argued that she had no …

Bhola Uraon @ Bhola UranversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bhola Uraon, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that no liquor was recovered from his conscious possession and that the premises involved were joint family property. He argued that the 2018 …

Santosh Yadav @ Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Santosh Yadav and Bipin Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several IPC offences (sections 341, 323, 385, 504, 506, 272, 273) and the Bihar Excise Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, while intoxicated, arrived in a Scorpio …

Nagendra MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nagendra Mahto, feared arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 100 litres and 123.5 litres of liquor from a public place. He contended that the liquor was not found in his possession, the location did not belong …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor from a public Bhagwati Asthan. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the alleged recovery site did not belong …

Pappu RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three brothers from Kushar village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC Sections 272 and 273 and Bihar Excise Act Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) for allegedly recovering 10 litres of liquor and 1000 kg of mahua from a public bush. They argued they …

Naresh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Naresh Kumar, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 31.875 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor and was unaware that his friend …

Shyam Kumar @ Shyam Kumar MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shyam Kumar sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 22.5 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. The petitioner argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and that the …

Dinesh MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dinesh Mahto, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274, 275, 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. He contended that the alleged recovery of 31 litres of liquor and 400 litres …

Ajay KumarversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajay Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail after learning of a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 187.8 litres of liquor from a motorcycle near Keshav Market. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not …

Sanjay ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Sanjay Choudhary, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. During the hearing on 15-01-2026, the petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Pramod Kumar, sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail petition. The State, represented by Mr. Abhay Kumar, opposed the …

Viral BhagatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Viral Bhagat and Lagan Bhagat applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 80 litres of liquor. They contended that they have no prior criminal record, the liquor was not found in their …

Yogendra ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Yogendra Thakur and his sons, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for alleged recovery of 889.2 litres of liquor. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not in possession of the seized …

Manoj Rai @ Manoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Rai applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 23.345 litres of liquor from his joint family house. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not found in his personal possession, the …

Shatrudhan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shatrudhan Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 140 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious possession …

Suraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Suraj Kumar, the owner of a Hyundai car, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 37(1) of the Excise Act for the recovery of 750 ml of liquor from his vehicle. He argued that he had a clean …

Manoj Kumar Yadav @ Manoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Kumar Yadav applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging that 889.2 litres of liquor were recovered from his truck and a motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not present at the spot of seizure, and that …

Kanchan Kumar MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kanchan Kumar Mandal, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor from a water tank. He asserted that he has a clean …

Shailesh Yadav @ Shailesh Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shailesh Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018 alleging that 282.06 litres of liquor were recovered from his cattle house. The petitioner contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, …

Guria Devi @ Gudia KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guria Devi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor recovered from a joint family house. The petitioner argued that she has a clean antecedent, is a …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor from his motorcycle and a house. He argued that he was not in actual …

Abdhesh Sahani @ Abadh Kishore Sahni @ AbdheshversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, two brothers, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 concerning alleged possession of liquor and Jawa Mahua. They filed an anticipatory bail application. During pendency, petitioner 1 was arrested and his counsel sought to withdraw …

Sandil Kumar @ Shandilya RajversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Sandil Kumar and Navin Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act concerning alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. They argued that no liquor was found in their conscious …

Nagina SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nagina Sahani, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act concerning the alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from the Dharauti river. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and …

Reena Devi @ Rina DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Reena Devi, a woman with no prior criminal record, was implicated in a case alleging the recovery of 22,200 litres of liquor from three motorcycles, charged under Sections 317(4) and 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. She contended that no …

Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Kumar, the owner of a motorcycle from which 30 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered, feared arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a …

Khaltha Kumar @ Saurav Kumar @ Saurabh Kumar @ KhaltaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Khaltha Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 26.25 litres of liquor from the house of Viru Kumar. He argued that he had no possession of the liquor, no relationship with the alleged location, and the FIR omitted the …

Akhilesh Kumar Singh @ AkhileshversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Akhilesh Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving numerous offences under the Bihar Penal Code and the Bihar Excise Act, including alleged recovery of 652.875 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not caught in possession, did not own the seized …

KARAN MANJHIversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Karan Manjhi, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor from a bush near a river and from a motorcycle. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the …

Abhishek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 24.75 litres of liquor and beer from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at …

Munshi RishiyashanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Munshi Rishiyashan, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he was not present at the spot, had no conscious possession of the …

Chandan Ray @ Chandan RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandan Ray, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 4.125 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle, had a clean criminal record, and was not in …

Yashodhar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Yashodhar Yadav, owner of a Scorpio vehicle, was implicated in a case where 450 litres of liquor were recovered from his vehicle, alleged to violate Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He applied for …

Vishwajeet Bantar @Vishojeet BantarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vishwajeet and Abhishek Bantar were implicated in a case under Sections 274, 275(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016 for allegedly recovering 49.2 litres of liquor from a public canal. The petitioners, claiming a clean antecedent and no …

Shiv Kumar Yadav @ Shivrath YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shiv Kumar Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 225 litres of liquor recovered from a bush near a canal. The petitioner …

Kanhaiya Chaudhary @ KanhaiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kanhaiya Chaudhary, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 9 litres of liquor, though no liquor was found in his possession and the alleged recovery occurred on land not belonging to him. He claimed the complaint was filed by an …

BHAGWATI DEVIversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

DISPOSED

Bhagwati Devi, the wife of Pankaj Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 3.75 litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned. She was not present at the spot of seizure and did not have the liquor in her conscious …

Meghu PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Meghu Paswan, was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 8.94 litres of liquor from his house, a joint family property, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He asserted a clean criminal record and argued that the liquor was not in his …

Raju Rai @ Raju KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raju Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 33 and 34 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 280 litres of spirit were recovered from a bush near his house but not from his possession. He argued that the …

Umawati Devi @ Umrawati DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Umawati Devi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that the liquor recovered was not in her possession and was seized from premises adjacent to her house. She has a prior case under the Excise Act and contended that …

Ramesh Prasad @ Ramesh Prasad GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramesh Prasad, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 800 ml of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was unaware …

Mohammad SaddamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mohammad Saddam, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 50 litres of spirit from a motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, the seized vehicle is …

Jitendra Kumar Jaiswal @ Jitendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar Jaiswal, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that liquor was recovered from a location adjacent to his shop and that he was not in possession of the contraband. He argued that the …

Bangar Rai @ Rajeshwar RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three brothers from Brahmchari Pokhar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from a canal. They argued that they were not caught in possession, the liquor was recovered …

Upendra Kumar @ Chhotu @ Upendra Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 9.75 litres of liquor from the dhaba owned by petitioner No.2. They argued that they have clean antecedents, were …

SHIVDANI CHOUDHARY @ SHIVDANI CHAUDHARIversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shivdani Choudhary applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC in connection with a case alleging offences under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Excise Act, where 2.5 litres of liquor were recovered from a house that is part of a joint family property. The petitioner argued that he …

Shivam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shivam Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that liquor was recovered from a motorcycle not owned by him and that he was not arrested at the spot. He contended that the FIR did not …

Santu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Santu Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor and 5,000 litres of jawa mahua from a public area. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the alleged …

Dashrath BhuiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Dashrath Bhuiya applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 82 litres of liquor from his house, which is a joint family property. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested, no liquor …

Manoj Singh @ Manoj Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three individuals with prior excise cases, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 111 of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 336.960 litres of liquor. They argued they …

Guli Sah @ Goli Sah @ Gulli SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Guli Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor near Sirani Canal. He contended that the liquor was not found in his possession, the alleged …

Urmila DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Urmila Devi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 12 litres of liquor from a structure adjacent to her house. The petitioner argued that she has a …

Sunil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunil Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 51.84 litres of liquor from a scooty he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the …

Ranvir SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranvir Singh, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Sections 30(a), 32, 41, 56(b) and 62 of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 438.75 litres of liquor from a godown. He contended that he has a …

Ramchandra Chaudhary @ Ramchandra PasiversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Ramchandra Chaudhary appealed against the rejection of his anticipatory bail application in a case under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, where he was alleged to have participated in an assault that led to the death of the informant's father. The appellant …

Mrityunjay Singh@ Chhotu Singh @ Kumar MrityunjayversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Mrityunjay Singh, filed an anticipatory bail application in the High Court of Patna. He later sought permission to withdraw that application and instead surrender to the trial court to seek regular bail. The Court, after hearing counsel, granted permission to withdraw the …

Tahseen HussainversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Petitioner Tahseen Hussain sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018, alleging the recovery of 110 litres of codeine cough syrup from a vehicle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no prior criminal record, and …

Ashish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ashish Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for the alleged recovery of 6.75 litres of liquor from an Indio car. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and that the liquor was not found in his …

Ramadhar MadeshiyaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, Ramadhar Madeshiya and his wife Binda Devi, appealed against the refusal of anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged assaults on an informant and his family, charged under several sections of the Bihar National Security Act, 2023 and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes …