Created by Fuzzy Cloud

SATYAVRAT VERMA

5892 judgments · newest first · showing 5201–5400

Chandan Mahto @ Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Chandan Mahto applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC Sections 272, 273/34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016. He argued that the case diary had not been produced, he was not arrested on the spot, and the alleged liquor …

Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Kumar was implicated in a case registered under IPC sections 272, 273 and 420 and Section 47(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 672 litres of liquor from a Bolero. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, …

Vivek Kumar @ Vivek SahniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vivek Kumar and Pawan Kumar applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 305 and 331(4) of the B.N.S., alleging that their names were implicated solely through a confessional statement of another accused, Adarsh, which the petitioners argue lacks evidentiary value. The …

Ganga Prajapati @ Ganga Ram KumharversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ganga Prajapati and Sharda Devi, the father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 80(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The informant alleged that after a dowry dispute the accused strangulated his daughter, who later was found dead by …

Bhim YadavversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The appellant, Bhim Yadav, was charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and related provisions for the alleged assault and death of his father. The informant’s FIR named other accused, and the wife of the deceased did not identify the appellant as …

Brajesh Singh @ Brajesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants – five residents of Raundha village – were convicted in the lower court of offences under several sections of the B.N.S. and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant who was a delivery boy. The informant claimed that …

JITENDRA KUMAR RAY @ RAJ @ JITENDRA KUMAR RAJversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar Ray, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case involving robbery under Section 392 IPC, later amended to include Sections 412 and 120(B) IPC. He claimed that the FIR was initially against unknown persons and that his implication arose solely from a …

Mukesh Kumar @ Lagara @ LangaraversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Mukesh Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. He later sought permission to withdraw that application and to surrender, intending to apply for regular bail. The Court granted the request to withdraw the anticipatory bail and dismissed the petition. It clarified …

Neeraj Kumar @ Niraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Neeraj Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. He later sought permission to withdraw that application and to surrender to the authorities to obtain regular bail. The Court, after hearing counsel, granted permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail petition and …

Sunita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sunita Devi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 85 litres of liquor from her residence. The petitioner argued that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that the …

Fulan DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Fulan Devi sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Sections 108 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita alleging dowry demand, torture, attempted murder and the subsequent suicide of a woman. The petitioner, a sister‑in‑law, argued that she has a clean record, was not an …

Ghutar Mandal @ Dhatan Mandal @ Dhutan MandalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ghutar Mandal, a resident of Bhagalpur, was named in an FIR alleging multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, including assault and theft. He contended that the allegations were false, arising from a neighbourly dispute over a passage, and that the FIR was a retaliatory measure. The …

Archana KumariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The High Court considered an application for anticipatory bail filed by Archana Kumari, who was implicated in a dowry‑death case under Sections 108, 80 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The informant alleged that Archana had an illicit relationship with Rupesh, the husband of the deceased, and that she, …

Upendra SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Upendra Singh, was accused of assaulting the informant's grandmother and mother over a dispute concerning an Aadhaar card, with the informant alleging that the petitioner and his wife attacked them. The petitioner contended that he has a clean record and that the allegations are …

Mantun YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mantun Yadav sought to withdraw his anticipatory bail application after being arrested; the court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed his petition. Abhinandan Yadav, a 25‑year‑old with a clean record, applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged firing, land‑dispute related arson, …

Devnandan Sah @ Debu Ji @ Deva Nandan Sah @ DebojiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Devnandan Sah, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging the recovery of 1304.4 litres of liquor from a pick‑up vehicle. The petitioner claimed he was not arrested at the …

Mahesh Kumar @ Mahesh Kumar Singh @ Mahesh SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mahesh Kumar, the owner of a vehicle from which 150 litres of liquor were recovered, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. The petitioner argued that he had no direct possession of the liquor, was not arrested at the spot, and had a clean criminal record. The State opposed …

Dhiraj Yadav @ Dhiraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Dhiraj Yadav and Pradip Yadav applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Excise Act, alleging that the liquor recovered was not in their conscious possession and that the field from which it was seized did not belong to them. They argued that …

Guddu RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Ram, a resident of Saran district, feared arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 85 litres of liquor and destruction of 400 litres of mahua from a public riverbank. He argued that he had no possession of the contraband, the site was …

Santosh Rai @ Santosh Kumar Yadav @ Santosh RayversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Santosh Rai filed an anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Procedure Code. While the application was pending, he was arrested. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court granted the request, allowing the withdrawal. Consequently, …

Dharmendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three residents of Badroi village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 205 litres of liquor and two motorcycles from a brewery near the Paier river. They argued they have …

Mina DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mina Devi, the petitioner, applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 252 litres of liquor from her motorcycle and an auto. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and was not in conscious possession of the liquor; …

Raja Kumar Paswan @ Raj Kumar PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Raja Kumar Paswan applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor from another shop. He asserted a clean criminal record, no possession of the liquor, and no …

Pramod MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pramod Mahto was implicated under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly possessing 15 litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house. He was not arrested at the scene, and the liquor was not found in his conscious possession; moreover, the FIR omitted the name of the …

Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, had filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner then sought the court's permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The learned counsel for the petitioner argued …

Md. ShahidversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Md Shahid was implicated in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of large quantities of spirit seized from a motorcycle and a shop. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting a clean criminal record and claiming he neither owned the seized vehicle nor had the …

Raushan Kumar @ Raushan Kumar RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raushan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged possession of 33.57 litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house. He argued that he had no conscious possession, the …

Shyam Saw @ Ram KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shyam Saw alias Ram Kumar, was implicated in an excise case involving the alleged recovery of 275 litres of liquor and two bicycles, though he was not arrested at the scene and claimed the evidence was based on secret information. He has three prior cases under the Excise Act and …

Rustam Yadav @ Rustam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rustam Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a), 37(c) and 41(i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging recovery of ten litres of liquor from a joint family house. He argued that he has a clean …

Pravesh Bhuian @ Pravesh BhuiyanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pravesh Bhuian, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly recovering 24 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in his vehicle, that the …

Shambhu SadaversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Shambhu Sada was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending. He sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application after his arrest. The petitioner’s counsel requested withdrawal and the court considered whether such a withdrawal could be permitted. The …

Tej Narayan MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Tej Narayan Mandal, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 22.8 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle, was not in actual possession, and had a clean …

Puna KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Puna Kumar applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that no liquor was recovered from his possession and that the informant’s identity was omitted from the FIR. He argued that the police mechanically …

Akash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Akash Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 317(5), 338, 336(3) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of 78 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. The petitioner argued he had a clean …

Wakeel Sahni @ Okil sahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Wakeel Sahni, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from his motorcycle and a school bag. He argued that he was not present at the spot, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and …

Md. Hasan Imam @ Hasan Imam @ GudduversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Hasan Imam, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 114 litres of liquor from a cart. He asserted that he had a clean antecedent, was not the owner of the seized cart, and that the only evidence against him was a confessional …

Abhishek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 55.98 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a friend …

Vikash Kumar Singh @ Vikas Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vikash Kumar Singh was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in conscious possession of the liquor, and was unaware that another person, Guddu, misused …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rahul Kumar, a resident of Jan Tola, Saran, feared arrest in a case alleging recovery of 92.73 litres of liquor from an auto, an offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not in …

Sipi Turha @ Sippi Turha @ Satyendra PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sipi Turha, was apprehended for alleged possession of 97.29 litres of liquor recovered from his joint‑family house, alleged to violate Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was not seized from his …

Sita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sita Devi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case alleging offences under Sections 30(a), 41(1) and 41(2) of the Excise Act involving the recovery of liquor from a field adjacent to her house and from a truck linked to …

Arvind Singh @ Arvind Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Arvind Singh and Dhuran Singh applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 111 of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 233.280 litres of liquor. They contended that they were not in possession of the seized vehicle, were not owners, and that the …

Manoj Singh @ Manoj Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Singh applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest under Section 111 of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 233.280 litres of liquor. The petitioner argued that he was not in possession of the seized vehicle, was not the owner, and that the only evidence …

Baby SoniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Baby Soni, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 259.410 litres of liquor from her Tata Safari vehicle. She argued that she had a clean antecedent, was a woman, and was not in …

Amar Kumar @ Amar Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Amar Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for allegedly possessing three litres of liquor in a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the liquor, and …

Mathura Dhangad @ Muthura MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mathura Dhangad, applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging offences under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, based on the alleged recovery of 52 litres of liquor and destruction of 150 litres of mahua pass from his …

Pawan Mandal @ Pawan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pawan Mandal, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging recovery of large quantities of liquor from properties linked to his relatives. He contended that the liquor was stored in a joint family …

Nagina KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Nagina Kumari, owner of a motorcycle from which 13.876 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2016. She argued she had a clean antecedent, was a woman, and had no knowledge of the liquor …

Nandlal DhangarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nandlal Dhangar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 30(a) and 41(i) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor recovered from his house and a nearby bush. He argued that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, the house is joint family …

Guddu Kumar @ Guddu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Kumar Yadav, a resident of Manikpur village, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 2.25 litres of liquor from a paddy field that does not belong to him. He feared arrest and filed a petition for anticipatory bail, arguing that the …

Ganauri Manjhi @ Gandura ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, six individuals from Tetri Musahari village, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 10 litres of liquor. They argued that they were not arrested at the spot, had no …

Siya DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Siya Devi, the owner of a motorcycle from which 150 litres of liquor was seized, was implicated in offences under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act. She applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that she was not in actual possession of the liquor, had no knowledge of its misuse by a …

Shanti Devi @ Shanti KuwarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shanti Devi, a woman with two prior excise cases, feared arrest after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 270 litres of liquor from a bush behind her hut. She contended that the liquor was not in her possession, the site did not …

Chandresh ChauhanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandresh Chauhan, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 140.400 litres of liquor from a motorcycle and a car he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, and …

Aman KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Aman Kumar was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending. He approached the High Court seeking permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The petitioner’s counsel argued for withdrawal, and the court considered whether such withdrawal was permissible. The court …

Jay Prakash Ray @ Wakil RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Jay Prakash Ray sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case alleging that 24 litres of liquor were recovered from his scooter, invoking IPC sections 272, 273 and 34 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018 sections 30(a) and 41. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested on …

Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Santosh Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 20 litres of liquor recovered from a bush. He argued he had a clean antecedent, the liquor was not in his conscious …

Mahesh PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mahesh Paswan was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 56(b) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for the alleged recovery of 99 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and …

Jay Kishor KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three residents of Sitamarhi district, sought anticipatory bail after learning that they might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act involving alleged recovery of 1,517.25 litres of liquor from a school, a Hyundai Santro car and a scooty. They contended …

Situ Kumar @ Sintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Situ Kumar, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was …

RUPAN MURMU@ RUPAN MUMURversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rupan Murmu, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing six litres of liquor and Rs.4,000 recovered from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was only linked …

Bikku KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Bikku Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for the alleged recovery of 18 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time …

Most. Manju DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manju Devi was arrested in connection with an alleged offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act involving the recovery of 30 litres of liquor and the destruction of 80 litres of semi‑prepared liquor. She contended that she was not apprehended at the scene, had no possession of the liquor, …

Anjali Kumari @ Anjali DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Anjali Kumari and Kamini Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving multiple offences under the Bihar Penal Code and the Bihar Excise Act, alleging they have clean antecedents and were not directly involved in the alleged recovery of liquor from Bashista Ray's …

SHIV KUMAR YADAVversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shiv Kumar Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under IPC sections 420 and 34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 55.8 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, did not own the …

Munna RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Munna Rai, the petitioner, feared arrest in an excise case (PS Motipur Case No. 376 of 2025) involving alleged recovery of 539.640 litres of liquor from a Tata Magic vehicle. He claimed he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and was implicated solely on secret information …

Lala YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Lala Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging recovery of 100 litres of liquor from an e‑rickshaw. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and …

Raja KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raja Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 2 litres of liquor and a motorcycle. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession …

Raj KishoreversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raj Kishore, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 130 litres of liquor near a school. He argued he had a clean antecedent, the liquor was not recovered from his possession, and the …

Dhanmatiya Devi @ Dhanmuni DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Dhanmatiya Devi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 5 litres of liquor from her residence, which she claims is joint family property and not in her conscious possession. She argued she has a clean antecedent and that …

Sanjit SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjit Sahni, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 45 litres of liquor were recovered from a paddy field adjacent to his house. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no …

Gautam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gautam Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 5.82 litres of liquor from other individuals. He argued that he was not caught in possession and that the case was based solely on a confessional …

Pawan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pawan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 17.5 litres of liquor recovered from a husk house adjacent to his residence. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, that …

Subhash AgarwalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Subhash Agarwal, owner of a motorcycle, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 25.98 litres of liquor from his vehicle. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession and that he was unaware of any misuse of the …

Indrajit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three residents of Khakhai village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 99 litres of liquor near Ramvilash Yadav's field. They argued they have clean antecedents, the liquor …

Shankar PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Shankar Paswan and Surendra Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 120 litres of liquor from a motorcycle they owned. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not in …

Pinki Kumari @ Pinki DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Pinki Kumari and Anju Kumari, daughters of Sanjay Chaudhary, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging recovery of 14 litres of liquor and 240 litres of Jawa Mahua from their father's house. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not arrested at the spot, and had …

Nitesh Kumar @ Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nitesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 180 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his …

Jitendra RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jitendra Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the site did not belong to him, …

Bhadru Paswan @ Akash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Bhadru Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under the NDPS Act and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 15.2 g of heroin, 2.81 g of ganja and 6 L of liquor recovered from Chandra Bhushan Kumar. He contended he had a clean …

Rajendra RajwanshiversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Petitioner Rajendra Rajwanshi was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending. His counsel sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court considered the request and granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail …

Neero DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Neero Devi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly possessing 7 litres of liquor recovered from a corridor outside her house. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, is …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 240 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicles, and was …

Ram Niroha Mahto @ Ram Nirhora @ Ram NirohaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Ram Niroha Mahto and Awadhesh Dubey, home guards, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act after a video showed them at a premises where 750 ml of a red liquid, later identified as containing ethyl and methyl alcohol, was recovered. They argued that they …

Md. Alamgir @ Md. AlamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Alamgir, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 after 9.36 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of the driver’s misuse of the vehicle and possessed a clean criminal …

Sita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sita Devi, applied for anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act alleging recovery of 25 litres of liquor from her residence, which is a joint family property. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that …

Shailesh Kumar @ Bhondu Chaudhary @ Shalesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shailesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor and 200 litres of jawa mahua from a forest area. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no contraband was found in his …

Shivji RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shivji Ram, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 45 litres of liquor from a bush on land belonging to another person. He asserted that he has a clean criminal record, was not arrested at the scene, and that the …

Munna YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Munna Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging recovery of 42.8 litres of liquor from a sugarcane field that does not belong to him. The petitioner argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, that …

Ajay ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajay Manjhi, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 4 litres of liquor and three bottles of Kingfisher beer found in a house that is part of a joint family property. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, that the …

Devanand Prasad Gupta @ D.P. GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Devanand Prasad Gupta, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged possession of 77.760 litres of liquor recovered from his Tata Safari. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, …

Golu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Golu Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged seizure of 120.96 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he had a clean criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was …

Vijay Rai @ Vijay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vijay Rai (Vijay Kumar) applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where liquor was allegedly recovered from premises adjacent to his house but not from his possession. He argued that the complaint originated from a chowkidar …

Om PrakashversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Om Prakash, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly possessing 1.4 litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle, that the liquor was …

Rajesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Rajesh Kumar and Guddu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 2,664 litres of liquor. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not arrested at the spot, did not own the seized vehicle, and were implicated …

Mahavir KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mahavir Kumar, the owner of a vehicle from which 405 litres of liquor was seized, applied for anticipatory bail under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession …

Aakash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Aakash Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 110 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a motorcycle not owned by him. He argued that he was implicated solely on the testimony of a …

Ragini DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ragini Devi, owner of a Tata Punch, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018 after 1.050 litres of liquor were recovered from her vehicle. She was not arrested at the scene and the liquor was not found in her personal possession; the prosecution …

Chhotu Das @ Dhirendra DasversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chhotu Das, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 32(iii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of liquor from his shop and a motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was not found in his …

Uttam Kumar Yadav @ Uttam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Uttam Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 720 litres of liquor from a public riverbank. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, the recovery …

Kanchan DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Kanchan Devi applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 275 litres of liquor from a totorickshaw. She argued that she had no conscious possession of the liquor, was not arrested at the spot, and was merely …

Rakesh Kumar @ GolaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 230 litres of liquor from an auto. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not caught in possession, and is not the owner of the …

Munna ChauhanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Munna Chauhan applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 160 litres of liquor from a public bush. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, the FIR …

Manoj Sahani @ Manoj SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, seven residents of Banparua village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC Sections 272 and 273 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 (Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1)). They contended that no arrest was made at the scene, no liquor was found in …

Ram Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ram Kumar Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 274, 275, 317(5) and 34 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 675 litres of liquor from a …

Shambha Khatoon @ Anguri KhatoonversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shambha Khatoon applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 alleging that 9.6 litres of liquor were recovered from her house, which is a joint family property. The petitioner argued that she has a clean …

Mannu Kumar @ Mannu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mannu Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 160 litres of liquor from a banana orchard adjacent to his house. The petitioner argued …

Omprakash Sah @ Om Prakash SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Omprakash Sah, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging the recovery of 18.360 litres of liquor from a bag and a motorcycle. He asserted that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was not the owner of the seized …

Sukesh Rai @ Sukesh Prasad YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sukesh Rai, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that the alleged liquor recovery occurred at a location not under his possession and that his name was omitted from the FIR. The petitioner argued that the …

Yogesh Kumar @ Jugesh RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Yogesh Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 10.750 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. The petitioner argued that no liquor was …

Baldev Yadav @ Baaldev YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Baldev Yadav applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 125 litres of liquor. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the scene, the alleged contraband was …

Guddu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Guddu Kumar and Pappu Ray applied for anticipatory bail before the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, they were arrested by the police. The petitioners, through their counsel, sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The State opposed the withdrawal. The …

Santosh singhversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Santosh Singh, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for alleged recovery of 207.75 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in actual possession of the liquor, and was only the …

Sharwan Choudhary @ Sarwan ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sharwan Choudhary was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 83.175 litres of liquor from his house, alleged to be an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He applied for anticipatory bail, contending he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was in a …

Soni DeviversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Petitioner Soni Devi applied for anticipatory bail in a criminal miscellaneous case. While the application was pending, she was arrested in connection with the case. Her counsel then sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court, after hearing both sides, …

Ramesh Kumar @ JhutailaversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Ramesh Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner’s counsel then sought the court’s permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court examined whether a …

Pappu Singh @ Amar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants appealed under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the Special Judge’s refusal to grant anticipatory bail in a case involving multiple offences under the IPC and the SC/ST Act. They contended that the FIR contained …

Nandeshwar Singh @ Sadhu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The appellant Nandeshwar Singh was convicted in a criminal case (PS case No.178/2023) and filed an appeal before the Patna High Court. During the hearing, the appellant’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the appeal and to surrender to the trial court to seek regular bail. The court granted …

Upendra RavatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The appellant, Upendra Ravat, was charged under several provisions of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act, 2023 and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for allegedly assaulting the son of an informant, causing multiple injuries, including one grievous …

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 87 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, alleging abduction of a factory employee. He contended that he has a clean record and that the allegations are false, asserting that the …

HIRA YADAVversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Hira Yadav appealed against the State of Bihar and Pyari Kunwer in a criminal matter arising from PS Durgawati. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant was arrested. The appellant's counsel sought the court's permission to withdraw the appeal on the ground of the arrest. The High Court, …

Pawan Kumar @ Pawan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, six residents of Laxminiya village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023 relating to alleged assaults and accusations of witchcraft. They contended that they have clean antecedents and that the informant had falsely …

Naveen MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Naveen Mahto, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the CrPC for an alleged theft offence under Section 379 of the IPC. He requested a correction in the FIR date from 27.08.2020 to 20.02.2020, which the court permitted. The petitioner had two prior cases and was previously …

Ramayan Sahani @ Ramkaran SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ramayan Sahani sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving numerous IPC offences, alleging that the FIR was false and that earlier cases pertained to the same incident. He argued that the allegations of assault and looting were vague and ornamental, and that he had already secured …

Subhash Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Subhash Kumar Yadav, was implicated in a 2017 case (PS‑63) for offences under IPC Sections 365 and 34 based on an informant’s allegation that he and others abducted his father. The police investigation concluded with a final form (No. 77/2023) finding the petitioner innocent, yet the …

Dhananjay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dhananjay Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code after fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 309(4) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. The FIR alleged that the petitioner’s vehicle was used by an accused, …

Suresh SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Suresh Sah, sought anticipatory bail in a case where he was charged under several IPC sections for alleged assault and related offences. He contended that he has a clean record and that the FIR was lodged 12 days after the alleged incident without a satisfactory explanation, …

Ranjay Thakur @ Ranjay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Dr. Ranjay Thakur, a rural doctor with a clean record, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving the death of a woman, the wife of Naveen Kumar. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner assisted Naveen Kumar and his family in disposing of the dead …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 308(5), 303(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act for alleged involvement in a looting incident. The FIR described unknown assailants looting cash, mobiles and firing …

Pintu MusharversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pintu Mushar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 28 litres of liquor from a paddy field adjacent to his house. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his …

Sagar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sagar Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018 & 2022, where 237.24 litres of liquor and 174 litres of beer were allegedly recovered from a bus. He contended that he was not in possession of the …

Rakesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, was implicated in an excise case for the alleged recovery of five litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that another individual, Sudhir, misused his vehicle. The State …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manish Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 219.6 litres of liquor from three motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not present at the …

Komal Mauraya @ VishalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, Komal Mauraya and Vijay Maurya, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 1111.60 litres of liquor. They argued that they were not arrested at the spot, had no possession of …

Guddu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Kumar sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging he was involved in the recovery of 35 litres of liquor from a motorcycle and one litre from a person named Md. Nausad. The petitioner argued he was not caught in the act, did …

Bablu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Petitioner Bablu Kumar was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending. He sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The petitioner’s counsel submitted the request, and the State’s counsel was heard. The court granted permission to withdraw the …

Hari Lal RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, comprising Hari Lal Ram and four relatives, applied for anticipatory bail in a criminal case (Darauli PS Case No.247 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the B.N.S. The petitioners argued that the FIR was based on a trivial dispute over a buffalo and that they were …

Pradeep KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pradeep Kumar, was implicated in a case involving the seizure of 95.400 litres and 52.650 litres of liquor from four motorcycles, alleged under Sections 414 and 34 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was not present at the spot, had no liquor in …

Chandan @ Chhotu @ ChhotiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Chandan and Kariman sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 129 litres of liquor from a vehicle. They argued they had no conscious possession, were not owners of the seized vehicle, and the FIR …

Kunti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kunti Devi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. after a seizure of 1080 kg of mahua flower from a motorcycle she owned, alleged to be in violation of Section 30(c) of the Excise Act. She argued that she was not present at the spot, had no conscious …

Mahendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mahendra Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for the alleged recovery of 18.75 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor, that the vehicle was …

Lal Babu @ Govind Yadav@ Govind KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Lal Babu, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(c) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 50 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He was not caught in possession of the liquor, nor was he the owner of the vehicle, and the prosecution’s case relied on a …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 2.16 litres of liquor from a public bush behind a hotel. He argued he had no possession, a clean antecedent, and that the complaint was based on the …

Jokhan MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Jokhan Mahto sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act alleging recovery of liquor from his joint family house and from Munni Devi's house. The petitioner argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, the …

Daroga YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Constable Daroga Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 61 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not present at the spot of seizure, had no liquor in his possession, and was unaware that his …

Manjesh Kumar @ Manjesh ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manjesh Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application in the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court, after hearing counsel, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory …

Sudama RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sudama Rai applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a), 38(a) and 41(1) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 3,876.48 litres of liquor from a truck. He contended that he was not in possession of the seized goods, was not the owner of the truck, …

Chhotu Ram @ Maruti KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chhotu Ram (Maruti Kumar), feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 36 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 40 litres of liquor from a plastic bag. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, that the alleged liquor was not in his conscious possession, …

Lila Devi @ Masomat Lila DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Lila Devi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 35 litres of liquor from a thatched house that is part of a joint family property. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, …

Guddu Yadav @ Guddu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 650 litres of liquor from four motorcycles. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession …

Abhishek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Abhishek Kumar and Ankit Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, relating to alleged recovery of 1,840 litres of …

Gudiya DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Gudiya Devi applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 8.25 litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned. She argued that she had no prior criminal record, was a woman, and had no conscious …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manish Kumar applied for anticipatory bail in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act alleging recovery of 111.04 litres of liquor from vehicles he owned. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware of any misuse of his vehicle by a co‑accused. …

Raj Kumar PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Raj Kumar Paswan and Rajnish Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Sections 30(a), (c) and (d) of the Excise Act. They argued that they had not been arrested, that no liquor was found in …

Shri Vicky Kumar @ Vicky Ray @ Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vicky Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 561 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not caught in possession, was not the vehicle's owner, and was implicated solely on secret information without proper …

Nagendra RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nagendra Ray, sought anticipatory bail after the police seized 2.250 litres of liquor from his motorcycle and 41.340 litres from a cowshed, alleging violations of Sections 30(a), 56(b) and 44 of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had no prior criminal record, was not in …

Rupesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rupesh Yadav sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 81 litres of liquor from an auto and a motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the …

Pramod MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Petitioner Pramod Mahto filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, he was apprehended by the authorities. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court, after hearing both sides, granted …

Tikuli Nut @ Aman KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Tikuli Nut (Aman Kumar) was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of liquor and Mahua from a spot adjacent to his house. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not caught in possession, and that the FIR was based merely on a …

Prashant Kumar @ Prashant Kumar RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Prashant Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the BNSS and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging recovery of 36.75 litres of liquor from a bush adjacent to his house. He contended that the …

Guddu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, for alleged recovery of 351 litres of liquor from a public place. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found …

Dinesh Chaudhary @ Pusha ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dinesh Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 25 litres of liquor from a public place. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found …

Vishavjit Singh @ Mantu Singh @ Bishwajit SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vishavjit Singh, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a), 32(2), 32(3), 36, 41(1) and 41(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 7,555.68 litres of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, …

Tusi DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Tusi Devi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor from her residence and from another individual. She argued that she had no conscious possession, the property was jointly owned, and that …

Shri Kusheshwar MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Kusheshwar Mukhiya and Ramadhar Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 51 litres of liquor from their jointly owned house. They argued they have clean antecedents, the liquor was not in their conscious …

Anil NoniyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anil Noniya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 34 and 36 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 2,200 litres of spirit and three motorcycles were seized. He argued that he was not in possession of the seized items, was not the owner of …

Aditya Kumar @ Bambam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Aditya Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 100 ml of liquor was recovered from a house where he was a tenant, not the owner, and that no liquor was found in his …

Ram Kumari DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ram Kumari Devi, the owner of a motorcycle from which 28.365 litres of liquor and cash were seized, feared arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. She argued that she had no knowledge of the liquor being transported, …

Santra DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santra Devi, a woman with no prior criminal record, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018/2022 for alleged possession of 4.5 litres of liquor recovered from a field adjacent to her house. She argued that the liquor was not in her …

Parwati DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Parwati Devi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with an alleged offence under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act involving the alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor. The petitioner argued that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, …

SUKHARI BINDversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Sukhari Bind and Gudiya Devi, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 11.48 litres of liquor recovered from a joint family house. They argued they have clean antecedents, the liquor …

Sonalal SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonalal Sahni, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of large quantities of liquor from premises adjacent to his shop. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession and that the investigation …

Dinesh Ray @ Dinesh Kumar RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dinesh Ray, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for the alleged recovery of 514.5 litres of liquor from a truck he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and had no conscious …

Godhan Ram @ Godhan PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Godhan Ram, filed an anticipatory bail application in the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the application, he was arrested. The petitioner then sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The learned counsel for the petitioner argued that …

Rakesh Pashi @ Rakesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rakesh Pashi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of 100.8 litres of liquor from a rented house. He argued that he was not arrested, had no liquor in his possession, and was …

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Chandan Kumar and Chhotu Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor. They argued that they were not arrested at the spot, did …

Lal Bihari Mukhiya @ Lalbihari NishadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Lal Bihari Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 23,400 litres of liquor from a plastic sack. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the …

Akshay Kumar @ Akshay SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Akshay Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 1,128 litres of liquor from two vehicles. He contended that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the seized vehicles, and was implicated …

Ram Kumar KamtiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, who are the father‑in‑law, mother‑in‑law and brother‑in‑law of a woman, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 341, 323, 498A, 504, 34, the Dowry Prohibition Act (ss.3,4) and the Bihar Excise Act (s.37). The FIR alleged that the victim’s …

Balram Paswan @ Balram Kumar PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Balram Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case alleging offences under Sections 274 and 275 of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 18 litres of liquor from a paddy field. The petitioner argued that he was not caught …

Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 88.5 litres of liquor from a Hyundai car. He contended that he was not in possession of the seized liquor, was not the owner of the vehicle, and was …

Sumit Kumar @ Sumit Kumar RautversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Sumit Kumar Raut applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 58.970 litres of liquor from an auto. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, had no …

Santosh PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner Santosh Paswan feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of two litres of liquor from his house. He argued he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was in a joint‑family house and not in his conscious possession, and that the 2018 …

Koyali DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Koyali Devi, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing six litres of liquor recovered from a straw house on her premises. She argued that the liquor was not in her conscious possession, the straw house is accessible …

Ibran AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ibran Ansari, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 21.06 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the liquor, and was unaware that …

Sonu Singh @ Vikash Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Petitioner Sonu Singh, arrested in an excise case, filed an anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Procedure Code. During the hearing, he requested to withdraw the anticipatory bail and instead surrender to the trial court to seek regular bail. The High Court permitted the withdrawal, …

Rakesh Mukhiya @ Rakesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rakesh Mukhiya, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 2.35 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his …

Mundrika PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mundrika Prasad, a resident of Gaya, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 2 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of …

Pramod RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pramod Ram, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act for allegedly recovering 50 litres of liquor from five sacks. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and …

Bittu Thakur @ Bikash ThakurversusThe state of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bittu Thakur, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 632.880 litres of liquor from a bolero pickup. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, was not the vehicle's owner, and was …

Boby Kumar @ Ravi Kumar @ BobyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged offences under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic and Smuggling Act and the Excise Act, alleging that no liquor was recovered from their personal possession and that the alleged recovery was from a jointly owned family …

Bacchalal Choudhary @ Bachchalal ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Bacchalal Choudhary applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 21.66 litres of liquor from various places including his shop. The petitioner argued that he has a clean …

Pankaj Rai @ Pankaj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pankaj Rai, sought anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under Sections 30(a) and 41(i)(ii) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 164.16 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He contended that he was not arrested at the scene, had no …

Shivam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shivam Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 30(c), 30(d), 33 and 36 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 22.360 litres of liquor and 10 litres of spirit recovered from his father's house. He argued that the liquor was stored in a joint …

Babita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Babita Devi, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 for alleged possession of 947.475 litres of liquor recovered from her son’s house and shop. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that …