Created by Fuzzy Cloud

SATYAVRAT VERMA

5892 judgments · newest first · showing 5401–5600

Chhabila MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chhabila Mukhiya, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Sections 272 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, involving the alleged recovery of 350 litres of …

Paras ChauhanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Paras Chauhan, the owner of a vehicle from which 322 litres of liquor were seized, applied for anticipatory bail after the police alleged his involvement under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being transported and that the actual …

Md. Nausad KhanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Nausad Khan, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 56(b) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 375 ml of liquor recovered from a scooty he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not caught in possession, …

Pikesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pikesh Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for alleged recovery of 180.750 litres of liquor from his vehicle. He argued that he was not in possession at the time of seizure, that the …

Vijay Yadav @ Vijo YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vijay Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a), 30(c) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of 110 litres of liquor from a public area. He contended that no liquor was found in his …

Umesh PasiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Umesh Pasi, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 120 litres of liquor and a motorcycle from a sand ghat. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the seized items, and was implicated …

Amit Kumar @ Amit SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Amit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, for the alleged recovery of 58 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in …

Rajan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajan Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 270 litres of liquor from a boat. He argued that he was not in possession of the seized boat, was not its owner, and was implicated only …

Akash Paswan @ Akash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Akash Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging offences under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and the Excise Act, stemming from an incident where the informant claimed he, along with his father Sanjit Paswan, assaulted her. The petitioner argued …

Jagarnath PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Jagarnath Paswan applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 272, 273 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor and jaggery solution from a joint‑family house. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested, …

Dipesh Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dipesh Kumar Yadav, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of 144 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, …

Munna YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Munna Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging recovery of 141 litres of liquor from a river bank, alleged offences under IPC sections 272, 273, 34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued he has a clean antecedent, …

Vijay SardarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vijay Sardar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 12.2 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that he had no conscious possession, that the amendment to the Excise Act in 2018 …

Ravibhushan Thakur @ Ravibhusan ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravibhushan Thakur, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 207.38 litres of liquor from his auto-rickshaw. He argued that he was not present at the spot, no liquor was found in …

Ramesh Sahani @ Ramesh SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramesh Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a), 38 and 40(i) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor and a motorcycle. He contended that he had a clean criminal record, that the liquor and vehicle were not in his …

Ravi KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Ravi Kumar and Raushan Kumar, filed anticipatory bail applications in a case involving offences under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code and the Bihar Excise Act. Ravi Kumar sought to withdraw his anticipatory bail application, and the court permitted the withdrawal, …

Tufani SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging that 75 litres of liquor were recovered from plastic sacks not in his possession and that the case was based on a confessional statement of another accused. The …

Shashi Ranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shashi Ranjan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that the alleged liquor seizure was from a third party's premises and that he had no possession or …

Sunny KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunny Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 150 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle he was riding. He argued that he has a clean …

Mahanand PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mahanand Paswan, the owner of a motorcycle from which 99 litres of liquor were recovered, feared arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a friend misused his vehicle. The State opposed his …

Suresh SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Suresh Sahani, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under IPC sections 272 and 273 and several provisions of the Excise Act, alleging that he was implicated without being arrested at the scene and that no liquor was recovered from his possession. He disclosed three …

Ram Nath ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ram Nath Chaudhary sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act alleging that 10 litres of liquor were recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. The petitioner argued that he had no conscious possession of …

Shobha DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shobha Devi, a resident of Khagaria, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged possession of five litres of liquor recovered from a spot adjacent to her house. The petitioner argued that …

Bedu Yadav @ Baiju YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bedu Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 34 litres of liquor from his hut. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the house is joint family property, and the 2018 …

Ajit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging that 190 litres of liquor were recovered from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not …

Abhishek Kumar @ Lallu Kumar @ Lalu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a sack not in his possession. He asserted a clean criminal record and argued that the alleged contraband …

Jimmi Kumar @ Ankit Kumar @ Ankit Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jimmi Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 576 litres of liquor from a boat. He contended that he was not arrested at the scene, had …

Bihari KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Bihari Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Procedure Code. During the hearing, he sought to withdraw that application and instead surrender to the trial court to seek regular bail. The petitioner’s counsel requested permission for withdrawal, and the court granted it. The …

Vikash Kumar @ Bittu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vikash Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018, where 25.62 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a location behind Gaurav Kumar's house. The petitioner argued that no liquor was found in his possession and …

Suraj Manjhi @ Suraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Suraj Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 21.24 litres of liquor on a scooty. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the scooty at the time, and the case was based solely …

Pankaj Kumar Manjhi @ Pankaj Kumar @ Pankaj ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Pankaj Kumar Manjhi and Raj Kumar Manjhi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of 30 litres of liquor from a bush adjacent to the petitioner's house. They …

Ramdev PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ramdev Paswan applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under IPC sections 272, 273 and 34 and Excise Act section 30(a) for allegedly recovering 27 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. The petitioner argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, …

Dipak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Dipak Kumar and Sanjay Tiwary applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 3.6 litres of liquor. They argued that the liquor was located in a joint family house, that they had no conscious …

Raj Narayan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Petitioner Raj Narayan Singh, charged under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420 and 34 of the IPC for a land‑related offence, was granted provisional bail on 19 August 2025 on the condition that he execute a sale deed of 3 decimal of land in favour of the informant. He later withdrew from that undertaking …

Akash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Akash Kumar, a CISF personnel posted in Jharkhand, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC Sections 341, 323, 498A and 34. He is currently residing with his wife (OP No.2) and child at his matrimonial home in Rohtas, while his posting is elsewhere and he lacks …

Ghanshyam YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ghanshyam Yadav, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 304B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged involvement in the dowry‑related death of his sister‑in‑law. The informant alleged that the petitioner and others demanded dowry, tortured the victim, and set her ablaze, …

Amarjeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Amarjeet Kumar, Rajbali Kumar and Manish Kumar, were arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 2,311.38 litres of liquor from several vehicles and charged under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 and the Arms Act. They applied for bail, contending they …

Pramod Pathak @ Pramod Kumar PathakversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Pramod Pathak, arrested on 17 May 2025, sought bail in a case (PS Kalyanpur Case No.125 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 127(2), 115(2), 118(1), 76, 109, 303(2), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. The petition alleged that he was falsely implicated …

Md. Taslim @ HaikalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Md. Taslim @ Haikal, was charged under Sections 120B, 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act in connection with a murder and conspiracy case (PS Tajpur Case No.113 of 2023). He had earlier applied for regular bail (Criminal Miscellaneous No.25768 of 2025) …

Himmat Rai @ Himmat YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Himmat Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita relating to a land‑dispute‑turned‑violence. He claimed a clean antecedent and alleged that the informant had falsely …

Santlal MandalversusThe State of Bihar

D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

Santlal Mandal filed an application before the Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from PS Barhat, Jamui. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the State of Bihar was represented by Advocate Ravindra Kumar. The court examined whether the application could be …

Rakesh Kumar Singh @ Surendra Kumar SinghversusThe Nagar Parishad, Motihari

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar Singh, filed a writ petition in 2017 seeking to quash a 2016 order that cancelled a lease deed between him and the Nagar Parishad, Motihari, alleging the order was passed without hearing and that the lease, originally executed in 1983 for 30 years, had lapsed in 2013 …

Md. Firoj @ FirojversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Firoj, had been granted anticipatory bail on 11 August 2025 with the condition that his father act as one of the bailors. After the father’s death on 5 June 2023, the petitioner filed a modification application, attaching the death certificate and seeking to replace the father …

Ajmudin @ Ajimuddin @ Md. AjmuddinversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ajmudin, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Dhaka Case No.303/2024) involving offences under multiple sections of the B.N.S. and Section ¾ of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984. He alleged that he was falsely implicated, as his name was not in …

Umashankar Singh @ Uma SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Umashankar Singh, a 72‑year‑old petitioner, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 399 and 402 of the IPC relating to alleged dacoity. He had earlier filed a similar application which was rejected, and he contended that although processes under Sections 82 and 83 of the …

NikhilversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nikhil, applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving multiple offences under the B.N.S., the Information Technology Act and the Arms Act, alleging that his name appears in a co-accused's confessional statement but he will cooperate with the investigation. The State opposed the …

Sumangal Kumar Rai @ Shiv Mangal RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sumangal Kumar Rai, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of over 5,200 litres of liquor from three vehicles. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession …

Satyam SauravversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Satyam Saurav, filed a second application for anticipatory bail before the Patna High Court after his earlier application (Cr. Misc. No.65850 of 2025) was withdrawn by order dated 17.09.2025. He argued that the withdrawal was voluntary and sought relief again. The learned senior …

Rajnish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Rajnish Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court in connection with a criminal case (PS Case No. 219 of 2019). The petitioner, represented by Mr. Arvind Kumar, later sought permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel for the State, Mr. Ganesh Prasad …

Bamb Shankar Baitha @ Bam Shankar BaithaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bamb Shankar Baitha, filed a restoration application seeking to have Criminal Miscellaneous No. 75319 of 2025 reinstated to its original file. The State of Bihar opposed the application. The court examined the pleadings filed in the restoration application. Finding that the pleadings …

Ram Avtar Mahto @ Ram Watar Mahato @ Ramotar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ram Avtar Mahto, a 70‑year‑old man with a clean criminal record, applied for anticipatory bail after a police case was registered alleging his involvement in the illegal recovery of 5,951.880 litres of liquor from a truck, two pick‑up vehicles and a car. The charges include offences under IPC …

Gopal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gopal Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly transporting 75 litres of liquor in a plastic bag on his motorcycle. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not …

Raju SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Raju Singh applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 317(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 81 litres of liquor from three motorcycles. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, that the motorcycles were merely owned by him, …

PANKAJ KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Petitioner Pankaj Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application in the High Court of Patna. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then sought permission from the court to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The court, after hearing counsel, granted the request to withdraw. …

Rahul Kumar Singh @ Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar Singh, filed an application seeking restoration of Criminal Miscellaneous No. 54809 of 2025, which had been removed from the court's file. The State of Bihar opposed the application, and both parties were represented before the Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma. The …

Bikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Bikash Kumar and Santosh Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 303(2), 317(2) and 111 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged illegal mining. They contended that they were not named in the FIR, the seized tractors did not belong …

Bhikhar Sao @ Bhakhri Sao @ Sahbir Sao @ Shahveer SawversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bhikhar Sao, was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 720 litres of liquor from a car. He has three prior cases but was not arrested at the scene and no liquor was found in his possession; he was implicated solely on suspicion …

DINESH SINGHversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dinesh Singh, was implicated in a FIR alleging offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, including assault and murder, after an alleged attack on an elderly informant. The informant died three days later of a cardiac failure, which the petitioner’s counsel argued was …

YURAJ KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Yuraj Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 11.25 litres of liquor, a bag and a seized motorcycle. He contended that he had no conscious possession of the liquor or the …

Radha KumariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, four residents of Nimaithi village, feared arrest in a case alleging fraud under Sections 316(5), 318(4), 338 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, where they were accused of withdrawing money from the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana by misusing beneficiaries' account numbers. They contended …

THAKUR TUDU @ PADUM TUDUversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

DISPOSED

Thakur Tudu and Sunita Devi filed a petition seeking restoration of Criminal Miscellaneous No. 79329 of 2025, which had been removed from the court's file. The State of Bihar opposed the petition. The petitioners argued that the grounds for restoration were satisfied. The learned counsel for the …

Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Deepak Kumar filed a restoration application for Criminal Miscellaneous No. 80609 of 2025, which had been pending in the Patna High Court. The petitioner argued that the case should be reinstated to its original file. The State of Bihar opposed the restoration. The court examined the grounds …

Manish Kumar @ Manish JaiswalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Manish Kumar, had been granted anticipatory bail on 10-11-2025 with the condition that his father would act as a bailor. It was later discovered that the father had died in 2008, and the original order omitted the word 'late' before the father's name. The petitioner filed a …

Bashistha Thakur @ Ranjan Kumar ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Bashistha Thakur applied for anticipatory bail in a criminal miscellaneous case. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then sought permission from the court to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The court, after hearing counsel, granted the request to withdraw. …

Uttam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Uttam Kumar and Gautam Kumar were charged under several IPC offences and provisions of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in a case registered at Gaya. During investigation they received a notice under Section 41A of the CrPC, cooperated fully and were not arrested, yet a charge‑sheet was …

Rahul Kumar Pandey @ Rahul Pandey @ Sonu PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar Pandey, applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging murder under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and an offence under Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR claims a family dispute over property led to an extortion demand, after which the petitioner …

Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Kumar sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act alleging recovery of 14,400 litres of liquor from a banana orchard. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, the liquor was not in his possession, …

Tinku KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Tinku Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 936 litres of liquor from a white pickup van. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious possession of …

Raj Kishor SadaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Petitioner Raj Kishor Sada applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 8 and 20(b)(ii), (c) of the NDPS Act, alleging that he is a clean person and that the seized 43 kg of ganja was found in an auto he owned but had allegedly sold to Majharul before the incident. The State opposed the …

Hira Lal @ Hira Chauhan @ Teni ChauhanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Hira Lal, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 15.5 litres of liquor from his house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, and that the 2018 …

Md. Ziauddin AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Ziauddin Ansari, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly transporting 201 litres of liquor in his vehicle. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor …

Arvind KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Arvind Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then sought the Court's permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner argued that withdrawal was appropriate given …

Renu DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Renu Devi, sought anticipatory bail after learning that she might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 78 litres of liquor from her motorcycle. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the …

Shailesh ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shailesh Manjhi applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging recovery of 18 litres of liquor and 7 kg of Mahua flower. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no contraband was found in his …

Bittu PatelversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bittu Patel, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 8.640 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the …

Renu DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Renu Devi, the owner of a motorcycle from which 37.200 litres of liquor was seized, feared arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. She argued that she had no conscious possession of the liquor, was not present at the spot, and was unaware that Nand Kishore Thakur would misuse her …

Suresh SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Suresh Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 37 litres of liquor from a bush near land belonging to others. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his …

Sonu Kumar @ Sonu Kumar SInghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, was granted provisional anticipatory bail on 8‑January‑2026, but the order incorrectly stated that he had a clean antecedent despite a supplementary affidavit showing two prior cases. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the trial court must verify his criminal record and …

Ram Babu RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ram Babu and Vinay Paswan applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for alleged recovery of 201 litres of liquor. They argued that the liquor was seized from a bag not belonging to them and that the only evidence …

Vipin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vipin Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 8.625 litres of liquor. He argued that the liquor was found in a joint family house, he …

Praduman Kumar @ Pradhuman KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Praduman Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging that liquor and raw material were recovered from a public riverbank and not from his possession. He argued that the complaint was …

Vijay SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vijay Singh, the owner of a motorcycle from which 8 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered, sought anticipatory bail under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, claiming he had no knowledge of the liquor and a clean criminal record. The petitioner argued that ownership of the vehicle does not …

Ravi KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravi Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 2.160 litres of liquor from a bush. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location did not belong to him, and the complaint …

Surendra SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Surendra Singh was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 27.720 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and he was unaware of his friend’s misuse of …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act for allegedly recovering 110 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor at the …

Shankar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shankar Yadav, the owner of a motorcycle from which 12 litres of liquor were recovered, was charged under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the liquor, and that the vehicle had been …

Kundan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor, …

TINKU KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Tinku Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, relating to alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor from an auto. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in …

Sudhir Kumar GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sudhir Kumar Gupta, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of 65.850 litres of liquor from his vehicle. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of …

Shatrudhan Kumar Sharma @ Shatrudhan SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shatrudhan Kumar Sharma applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 88.8 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. The petitioner argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the …

Baso DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Baso Devi, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of six litres of liquor from a joint family house. She argued that the liquor was not in her conscious possession, the house is jointly owned, and the …

Shashi Bhushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shashi Bhushan Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 4,007.52 litres of liquor from three vehicles. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not …

Prahlad SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Prahlad Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 81 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He contended that he was not present at the spot of seizure, had no …

Shiv ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shiv Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail after the police recovered 25 litres of liquor and 2 litres of spirit from his house in connection with an alleged offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued that the liquor was located in a joint …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manish Kumar feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly recovering 87.390 litres of liquor from a Swift Dzire. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not the owner of the seized vehicle, and that the liquor …

Sudhakant ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sudhakant Chaudhary, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing four litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean record, was not in actual possession of the liquor, and was unaware …

Dipak Sahani @ Dipak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dipak Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic and Smuggling Act (BNS) and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. He argued that the alleged liquor and Mahua flower were recovered from a location …

Vindeshwari Sardar @ Bindi SardarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vindeshwari Sardar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He asserted a clean criminal record and argued that …

Babita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Babita Devi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC in connection with a case alleging offences under several IPC sections (147, 148, 341, 323, 324, 504, 353, 307) and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. She argued that she has a clean record, was not arrested, and the alleged …

Radhika DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Radhika Devi, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of large quantities of liquor from a neighbour's house and a street in front of her residence. She argued that no liquor was found in her …

NITESHWAR KUNVAR @ NITESHWAR KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Niteshwar Kunvar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 40 litres of spirit from two motorcycles. He argued that he had no direct possession of the contraband, that he was unaware of his …

Pankaj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pankaj Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 459.5 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He argued he had no possession, was not the owner, and the case relied on a confessional statement made in police custody, which he …

Bigan Chaudhary @ Bigan @ Bigan Kr. ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Bigan Chaudhary sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from a sack. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the sack did not belong to him, and the complaint …

Ramesh RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramesh Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 1,950 litres of liquor from a pit and two scooters. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, …

Raj Kumar Kushwaha @ MashversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Raj Kumar Kushwaha applied for anticipatory bail in a case where he is alleged to have been involved in the illegal possession of 724.26 litres of liquor, charged under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. The petitioner claimed he was …

Jitendra PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Jitendra and Dharmendra Paswan, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 70 litres of liquor at their joint family house. They argued that they have clean antecedents, were not arrested at the …

Makun RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Makun Ram, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 48.2 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and had no conscious possession of the …

Abhay Kumar Yadav @ Dhanji YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Abhay Kumar Yadav and Umesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 15.87 litres of liquor from a collapsed house. They argued that they were not caught in possession, the FIR omitted the …

Uday PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, four residents of Chapra, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging possession of 43.200 litres of liquor. They contended that they were not arrested at the spot, …

Dhanu Mahto @ Dhane MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Dhanu Mahto, filed an anticipatory bail application in the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner then sought the court's permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The learned counsel for the petitioner …

Ankit Kumar @ Ankit SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, Ankit Kumar and Aniket Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in connection with a criminal case (Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No.991/2025) involving alleged possession of 500 ml of liquor and three empty cartridges, offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar …

Vishnu Kumar MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vishnu Kumar Mandal, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that he was implicated merely as the owner of a vehicle from which liquor was recovered, without any personal possession of the contraband. The petitioner …

Rani DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rani Devi, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016 after 51.75 litres of liquor were recovered from a bag placed beside her motorcycle. She argued that she had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor …

Rakesh Kumar @ GolaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 1,950 litres of liquor from two scooties. He argued he had no conscious possession, was not the owner of the vehicles, and had a clean …

Balbir YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Balbir Yadav and Pankaj Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 22 litres of liquor. They argued that they have clean …

Shobha DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shobha Devi, a resident of Garju Bigha in Gaya district, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 8 litres of liquor from Sita Devi's house and 6 litres from her own house. She contended that she had no conscious …

Dinesh PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dinesh Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor and 1500 litres of semi‑prepared Mahua from a river bank, a public place. He argued that nothing was …

Deepak Ray @ Deepak Kumar RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Deepak Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 197.88 litres of liquor from a washroom tank adjacent to his house. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found …

Chandan MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandan Mahto, feared arrest in a case alleging recovery of 55 litres of liquor from a bush behind his house, an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and the …

Sanjay Singh @ Sanjay PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sanjay Singh, the owner/driver of a tempo, was implicated in a case involving the seizure of 355 litres of liquor from his vehicle, attracting charges under Section 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He applied for anticipatory …

Bipin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bipin Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 180 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of the …

Saroj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Saroj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 506 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He asserted that he had a clean criminal record, was not the owner of the seized vehicle, and was …

Karan Kumar @ Karan Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Karan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging possession of 25.935 litres of liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. The liquor was recovered from a joint family house belonging to Chintu Kumar, and the …

Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Rai @ Deepak Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging recovery of 17.115 litres of liquor from a location not belonging to him and based solely on a confessional statement of another person, Sonu …

Sunil Kumar @ Sunil PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunil Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 191(2), 190, 115(2), 132 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 30(a) and 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He alleged that liquor and a large sum of money …

Aman KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Aman Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 24 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not the owner of the vehicle, that the seizure was based on the testimony of a chowkidar …

Akhilesh Kumar Singh @ Gudar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Akhilesh Kumar Singh was implicated in an excise case for the alleged recovery of 8.64 litres of liquor from his motorcycle, although he was not caught with the liquor and was not apprehended at the spot. The petitioner argued that mere ownership of the vehicle should not constitute possession and …

Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vikash Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 6.9 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He contended that he had no knowledge of the liquor, that it was not in his conscious possession, and that he has a clean …

Sanjay MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, a husband and three wives, applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act alleging recovery of 25 litres of liquor from their joint family house and a paddy field. They argued they have clean …

Prem KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Prem Kumar sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 290 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the liquor, was not the owner of …

Manoj Prasad @ Manoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Prasad sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 274, 275(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, relating to the alleged recovery of 1,980 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He argued that he was not …

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, was implicated in a case alleging the recovery of 235.35 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned, under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting a clean antecedent and claiming he …

Sachin Kumar MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sachin Kumar Mandal, was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 72 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned, under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was not in possession of the …

Jitendra Kumar ShawversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar Shaw, sought anticipatory bail after a police raid recovered 2,997 litres of liquor from a Hyva truck he owned. He argued he had no prior criminal record and was unaware that his brother had misused the vehicle, asserting that the liquor was not in his conscious …

Ajay BinversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajay, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging possession of liquor recovered from locations unrelated to him. He argued he had a clean antecedent and that the allegations were based solely on a confessional statement …

Vinod Kumar @ Langra @ Langda @ LagdaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vinod Kumar sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where liquor was allegedly recovered from two other individuals, Shriniwas Kumar and Dipak Kumar, with no material found in Vinod's possession. The petitioner argued …

Jitendra Kumar Singh @ Jitendra SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar Singh, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016/2018 for allegedly recovering liquor and a pistol, based solely on a confessional statement of another accused and without any material seized from his …

Naresh PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Naresh Prasad, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of four litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, and was unaware that …

Rajan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajan Kumar, owner of a truck, was implicated in the seizure of 90.3 litres of liquor from his vehicle under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that he had no knowledge of the driver’s alleged misuse of the vehicle and that the liquor was not found in …

Sunil Yadav @ Sunil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunil Yadav, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016 for allegedly possessing 46.5 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, did …

Amresh RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Amresh Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 432 litres of liquor from a public riverbank. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location did not belong to …

Dhiraj Das @ Dhiraj Kurail @ Dhiraj Kumar DasversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dhiraj Das, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 38 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, the liquor was not in his conscious …

Ravi Ranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravi Ranjan Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 13.5 litres of liquor recovered from a plastic bag. He asserted that he has a clean criminal record, was not arrested at the spot, and had no control …

Pappu SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Pappu Sah and Dashrath Mahto applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, alleging that 100 litres of liquor was recovered from a field adjacent to …

Udeya RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Udeya Rai, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 45 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle, had a clean criminal record, and that ownership of the …

BALBIR SAHNIversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Balbir Sahni and Mantosh Sahani applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 36 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor from an orchard not belonging to them. They asserted they have clean antecedents, were not caught in …

Arun SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Arun Sahni applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act alleging recovery of 35 litres of liquor from his joint‑family house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, …

Pattu Ram @ Mantu RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pattu Ram, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 69.12 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, the liquor was not in his …

Sachin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sachin Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 10.5 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was unaware of his friend’s misuse of the …

Chandan Mahato @ Chandan Kumar PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandan Mahato, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, the seized liquor was not in his conscious possession, and he was …

Vijay YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vijay Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that he was implicated solely on the basis of confessional statements of co‑accused and that no liquor was recovered from his …

Arun Singh @ HariomversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Arun Singh and his son Abhishek Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 21.75 litres of liquor and 54 litres of beer recovered from a cowshed on Arun Singh's premises. They argued they have clean …

Arvind ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Four petitioners applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 25 litres of liquor from a mango orchard. The petitioners argued that they were not arrested at …

PRAVIN KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Pravin Kumar and Munai Lal sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 15 litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard not owned by them. They argued they have no prior criminal record and …

Mangal BindversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mangal Bind sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 60 litres of liquor were recovered from four accused. He argued that he was not caught in possession and that his implication relied solely on a confessional statement of …

Pawan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pawan Kumar feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging that 27 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle. He argued he had no possession, was not the vehicle’s owner, and the case relied on a confessional …

Raman YadavversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Raman Yadav filed an anticipatory bail application in the Patna High Court fearing arrest in a criminal case. The petitioner, through counsel Binod Kumar Sinha, later sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail and instead surrender to the authorities to apply for regular bail. Justice …

Suren Yadav @ Vijendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Suren Yadav and Sandip Kumar were implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 for allegedly recovering 35 litres of liquor and 300 litres of Jawa Mahua from a public bamboo orchard. They argued that nothing was seized from their …

Savita Kuwar @ Sabita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Savita Kuwar and Sangeeta Devi, women residing in a joint‑family house in Bheldi, Saran, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for allegedly possessing 30 litres of liquor. They argued that they have no prior criminal record, that the liquor was …

Ajay PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajay Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Penal Code (191(2), 191(3), 190, 303(2), 132, 121(2), 109 and 121(1)). The FIR alleged that a group, including the petitioner, scuffled with …

Sattan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sattan Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC Sections 413 and 414 and Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act Sections 30 and 30(a) for alleged recovery of 335 litres of liquor and two motorcycles. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, was not …

Sima DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sima Devi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 20 litres of liquor recovered from a scooty she owned. She argued she had a clean antecedent, was unaware of any misuse of her vehicle by a …

Manoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Kumar, the owner of a Scorpio vehicle, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of five litres of liquor from his vehicle. He contended that he had no knowledge of the liquor, was not arrested at the spot, and that his nephew Hira Lal had …

Paichu Bhuiyan @ Arvind Bhuiyan @ ArvindversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Paichu Bhuiyan and Ramkesh Bhuiyan, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of liquor from premises adjacent to petitioner 1’s poultry farm and from petitioner …

Sanjeet DasversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjeet Das, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 41(1) and 41(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 2,517.120 litres of liquor from three vehicles. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested …

Umesh PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Umesh Paswan applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, where liquor was seized from his residence. The petitioner argued that …

Ramdeo RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ramdeo Ram, the owner of an auto from which 261 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and that the vehicle was …

Krishna Kant Kumar @ Anshu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Krishna Kant Kumar and Manoj Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in two separate criminal miscellaneous proceedings arising from the same police case (PS Case No.213 of 2025) involving alleged recovery of 555.57 litres of liquor from a Scorpio vehicle and a Basa under Section 30(a) …

Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Yadav @ YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, was implicated in a case (PS Case No.‑77/2017) for alleged offences under Sections 414 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 30(a)(d) of the Bihar Excise Act, concerning the recovery of five quintals of Mahua flower from an auto‑rickshaw. He contended that …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manish Kumar and Sandesh Kumar, owners of two motorcycles, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of 69.120 litres of liquor. They argued they had clean or minimal criminal …

Lalbabu Manjhi @ Lala Babu ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Lalbabu Manjhi, a resident of Chitnawan Mushari, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 105 litres of liquor and 2,000 litres of Jawa Mahua that were seized and destroyed. He contended that the liquor was stored in a joint‑family house, …

Bikranta KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Bikranta Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application in the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner, through counsel, sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court examined the request and found no …

Pandit TiwariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Pandit Tiwari sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging recovery of 64.590 litres of liquor from the house of Idrish Mian. He argued that he was not present at the location, had no …

DHARMENDRA MANJHIversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dharmendra Manjhi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Sections 30(a), 41(1) and 52 of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor from a place adjacent to his house. He asserted that …

Ramakant PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramakant Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged possession of 15 litres of liquor. The petitioner argued he had a clean antecedent and that the alleged recovery was made from persons apprehended by police, not from …

Akhilesh Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Akhilesh Kumar Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 351 litres of liquor from a pick‑up vehicle he owned. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that he had a clean antecedent, was not present at the spot of seizure, and …

Gopal @ Anant Gopal @ Gopal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gopal Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case where he is charged under multiple sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 70.5 litres of liquor. He has eight prior criminal cases, six of which are under the …

Mahesh RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mahesh Rai sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 18 litres of liquor from his tobacco shop. He contended that the liquor was seized in his absence and that the police relied on secret information without proper …

Ranjeet Yadav @ Ranjeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Ranjeet Yadav and Madhusudan Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case alleging offences under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Excise Act. They contended that they were not arrested at the scene, no liquor was …

Krishan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Krishan Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Section 317(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 30(A) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 916.200 litres of liquor from nine motorcycles. He asserted a clean antecedent, claimed he was not in possession of the …

Md. Rakim @ Md. Rakim AliversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Rakim Ali, was implicated in an excise case for allegedly possessing 4.52 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his friend misused the vehicle. The State …

Gautam Kumar @ Gautam @ RajaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Gautam Kumar and Anil Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 (Amended), where 108.75 litres of liquor was recovered from a joint family house and 1.8 litres from a bush. They argued that the …

Basant Yadav @ Vasant YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Basant Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 116.935 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. The petitioner argued that he was not in …

Amit Kumar @ ChintuversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Amit Kumar was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 41(1) and 41(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 17.250 litres of liquor recovered from a house that forms part of a joint family property adjacent to a petrol pump. The petitioner argued that he has a clean …

Anil Choudhary @ Anil ChaudhariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anil Choudhary, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of 14 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that he was not arrested, no liquor was found …

Vikky Yadav @ Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Kumar @ Vikky YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vikky Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 870.120 litres of liquor from a tractor. He contended that he was not arrested at …

Chhotan TiwariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chhotan Tiwari, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 after 34.2 litres of liquor were recovered from a scooty he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of …

Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor from an under‑constructed house and a motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, …

Mukesh Mahto @ Mukesh Kumar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Mahto applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of 32,400 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, the liquor was not …

Vishal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vishal Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC in connection with alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Excise Act, where 23.5 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a house not owned by him. The petitioner argued that he was not in possession of the …

Surendar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Surendar Kumar was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 11.88 litres of liquor from his motorcycle, attracting charges under Sections 272 and 273 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The petitioner argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual …

Md Intiyaz AnshariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md Intiyaz Anshari, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018 for the alleged recovery of 425 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, was not arrested at the spot, and was …

Md Amanullah @ AmanullahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md Amanullah, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 61.2 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was unaware of his friend's …

Soni DeviversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Soni Devi, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from an excise investigation. The petitioner’s counsel sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application, requesting liberty to re‑file it …

Manoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The Patna High Court entertained two anticipatory bail applications filed by Krishna Kant Kumar (also identified as Manoj Kumar) in separate criminal miscellaneous proceedings arising from a police case involving the alleged recovery of 555.57 litres of liquor from a Scorpio vehicle and a Basa. The …

Nandlal SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Nandlal Singh and Ankit Raj, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 866.52 litres of liquor recovered from a joint family house and an auto. They argued that no liquor was found in their …

Pappu Yadav @ Ravindra Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pappu Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor from a public bush near Chalho Hill. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession, the location did not …

Vishal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vishal Kumar was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 56(b) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 135 litres of liquor from a car he owned. He contended that he was not present at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his driver misused the …

Santoke Bhuiya @ Santokhi BhuiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santoke Bhuiya sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of nine litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was only the owner of the …