Created by Fuzzy Cloud

SATYAVRAT VERMA

5892 judgments · newest first · showing 5601–5800

Rajendra Rai @ Rajendra RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajendra Rai, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 200 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He asserted a clean antecedent, argued that the liquor was …

Akash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Akash Kumar was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 105 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a friend had misused his …

Usha DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Usha Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging possession of 10 litres of liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that the liquor was found in a joint family house, making …

Kishori Kewat @ Kishori PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kishori Kewat, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 15.8 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a public place near a brick kiln. He argued that he was not caught in possession, the recovery site did not belong …

Nitish Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 126 litres of liquor from a motorcycle that he owned. He claimed the motorcycle had been stolen, a fact he reported to police on 23-02-2024, and argued that no liquor was …

Md. Minhaj AlamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Minhaj Alam, owner of a scooty from which 4.68 litres of liquor was recovered, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in his vehicle and that he was not in possession at …

Suraj Kumar @ Suraj Rai @ Suraj Kumar RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Suraj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), (b) and (c) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor and fermented jaggery from a public area not in his possession. He argued that the FIR lacked a proper informant, that the alleged …

Chhote PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Chhote Paswan sought anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 10 litres of liquor from his joint family house and from another house. He argued that he was not apprehended on the spot, no liquor was found in his conscious …

Rana Pratap KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rana Pratap Kumar, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly having 10 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a friend misused …

Pappu Kumar Gupta @ Pappu Kumar Shah @ Pappu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pappu Kumar Gupta, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 9.6 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the house being …

Avinash Kumar @ Abhinash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Avinash Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 157.2 litres of liquor from a car he owned. He argued that he had a clean criminal record, that the liquor was …

Dinanath SahniversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Petitioner Dinanath Sahni filed an anticipatory bail application. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court, after hearing both sides, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail …

Subodh Rai @ Mukesh Rai @ Subod RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner Subodh Rai sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 concerning alleged recovery of 60.300 litres of liquor from a field not belonging to him. He argued that the liquor was …

Umesh ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Umesh Chaudhary, was implicated in an excise case (PS No. 477 of 2025) for alleged possession of 50 litres of liquor and 400 litres of fermented Jawa Mahua, alleged under Sections 30(a), 30(c) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner argued that the liquor was recovered from …

Vikram KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Vikram Kumar and Rajdeo Chaudhary, filed an anticipatory bail application in a case registered under Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 170 litres of liquor. Rajdeo Chaudhary was arrested while the application was pending, and …

Bindeshwari ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bindeshwari Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that he was not caught in possession, that the liquor was not in his conscious control, …

Ishwardhari DinkarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Ishwardhari Dinkar and Bhim Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from the Sone river bank. They argued they have clean antecedents, no liquor was found in their …

Suraj Kumar @ Suraj Kumar YadavversusThe State Of Bihar

D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

Suraj Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar. No counsel appeared for the petitioner, while the State was represented by Mr. Md. Anzarul Haque Sahara. The court observed that there was no prosecution instituted against the petitioner. …

Rahul Kumar @ Pawan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 414 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the …

Pushpendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pushpendra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging recovery of 90 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he had no clean possession of the …

Manjit Chaurasiya @ Manjeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manjit Chaurasiya sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging recovery of 55.720 litres of liquor from Ganauri Mandal, with which he claimed no connection. The petitioner argued that no liquor was …

Prayag Bhuiyan @ Prayag RikiyasanversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Petitioner Prayag Bhuiyan filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Patna. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner, through counsel, sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court, after hearing both sides, …

Tapan Yadav @ Tapan Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Tapan Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 35 litres of liquor from a public hut near a temple. He has two prior criminal cases, one also under the Excise Act, but the alleged liquor was …

Abhinav Kumar @ Sunny SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Abhinav Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in an excise case involving alleged recovery of 455 litres of spirit from a Scorpio vehicle. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the seized liquor, was not the vehicle's owner, and was …

Anuj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Anuj Kumar, the owner of a motorcycle from which 75 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail, claiming he had no knowledge of the liquor being in his vehicle and that his friend misused the vehicle. He argued he had a clean criminal record and that the seizure was not from his conscious …

Kundan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 51 litres of liquor from a scooty. He has three prior criminal cases and contends that he was not arrested on the spot, that the liquor was not in his conscious …

Rakesh ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rakesh Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 10 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not arrested …

Pramod KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pramod Kumar sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, relating to the alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of …

Pintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pintu Kumar sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 45 of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that 30.75 litres of liquor were recovered from a third‑party, Madan, and not from his own possession. He contended that the case against …

Pintu Yadav @ Pintu Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pintu Yadav sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 175 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was unaware of his friend's …

Pradyut SamantaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pradyut Samanta, was implicated in a case involving the seizure of 2,646.72 litres of liquor from a truck, with charges under several IPC sections and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and that the …

Amarjit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Amarjit Kumar sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 102 litres of liquor from a public area near an Ahar. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the location was accessible to the public, and the …

SureshversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Suresh, the owner of a vehicle from which 300.750 litres of liquor was seized, applied for anticipatory bail under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not arrested at the scene, and …

Sandeep KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sandeep Kumar, was implicated in a case involving the alleged recovery of 150 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that he had a clean …

Aditya RajversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Aditya Raj, filed a second application for anticipatory bail in Criminal Miscellaneous No.72079 of 2025, relating to an excise case pending before the Exclusive Special Excise Court No.-1, Banka. He had previously sought anticipatory bail in Criminal Miscellaneous No.44530 of 2021, …

Nawal RoyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nawal Roy, feared arrest in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 102 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not caught in the act, the seized vehicle was not his, and the complaint originated from a chowkidar, raising doubts about …

Kundan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 29 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, and was unaware of any …

Govind KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Govind Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, the liquor was not found in his possession, and he was …

DINANATH RAMversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dinanath Ram, feared arrest in a case alleging that 25.20 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle, invoking Sections 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had no clean antecedent, was not arrested …

SANJAY PASWANversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjay Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 666 litres of liquor from a Bolero vehicle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was …

Amarnath PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Amarnath Pandey sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 84.48 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued that he was not present at the seizure, had no liquor in his possession, and was only the owner of …

Santosh Chaudhary @ Santosh Kumar ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Chaudhary sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 2.250 litres of liquor recovered from Baleshwar Kumar. The petitioner, who has thirteen prior cases, argued that he was not caught in …

Biru Mishra @ Birendra Mishra @ Birendra Kumar MishraversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Biru Mishra, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 414, 420, 467, 468, 34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, relating to the alleged recovery of 25,500 litres of liquor from an auto. He contended that he was not …

Madhurendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, a B.Sc. Nursing student, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No.135/2025) involving multiple offences under the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, the POCSO Act and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The allegations stem from a neighbour dispute where the …

Abdul WadudversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Abdul Wadud was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 45 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that the motorcycle had been stolen before the incident, that no liquor was found in his conscious possession, and …

Dharmshila DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dharmshila Devi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving the alleged recovery of 36 litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned, under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. She …

Nandev Yadav @ Nand Kishor YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nandev Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, for the alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was …

Mahesh Yadav @ Mahesh Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mahesh Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018/2022 for alleged recovery of 970.200 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was seized from his possession, …

Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vikash Kumar, the owner of a motorcycle from which 6.75 litres of liquor was recovered, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that he was not in possession of …

Lalan Yadav @ Prem Raj @ Lalan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Lalan Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 317(4) and 111(4) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, relating to alleged recovery of 750 litres of liquor from ten motorcycles. He argued …

Shrawan YadavversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shrawan Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 9.160 litres of liquor from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that he had no conscious …

MohitversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mohit, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 3067.56 litres of liquor from a truck and three vehicles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the …

Anand KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Anand Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. During the hearing, his counsel requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail and instead surrender to the trial court to seek regular bail. The Court granted the request, allowing the withdrawal of the …

Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rajesh Kumar Yadav sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging recovery of 15 litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard belonging to another person. The petitioner argued that he had no possession of the liquor, …

Sujit Kumar @ FaramversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sujit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of liquor not from his possession. He has six prior criminal cases, four under the Excise Act, and contended that the …

Rahul Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 432 litres of liquor from two vehicles he owned. He argued …

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, involving alleged recovery of 2,682.9 litres of liquor from three vehicles. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was …

Satyendra Rai @ Satyendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Satyendra Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, alleging that 180.18 litres of liquor were recovered from a bathan (open space) linked to him and another person. He argued that no liquor was found in …

Niraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sumangal Kumar Rai, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 954 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not in possession of the seized vehicle, that the case was based on secret information, …

Sumangal Kumar Rai @ Sumangal RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sumangal Kumar Rai, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 954 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not in possession of the seized vehicle, that the case was based on secret information, …

Shyamdev Chaudhari @ Shyamdev KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shyamdev Chaudhari, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Sections 30(a) and 34 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for alleged recovery of 55 litres of liquor from a public field. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, …

Chunchun Kumar Sah @ Chunchun SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Chunchun Kumar Sah, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in offences under the NDPS Act, Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, and the Arms Act. The allegations stemmed from a co-accused's confessional statement linking the petitioner to the supply of a gun used in …

Mahavir SahversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The appellants, a group of individuals from Bachhauta village, filed a criminal appeal (SJ) No.4662 of 2025 before the Patna High Court challenging a conviction by the Khagaria Sessions Court. During the hearing on 7 January 2026, the appellants informed the court that they had surrendered and …

Bhola Kumar ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Bhola Kumar Choudhary filed an anticipatory bail application in the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then sought permission from the court to withdraw his anticipatory bail petition. The court, after hearing counsel, granted the request to withdraw. …

Mahesh Kumar @ Mahesh sahversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Mahesh Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application in the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court, after hearing counsel, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was …

Pankaj Yadav @ Pankaj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pankaj Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Sections 30(a), 30(c) and 47 of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of large quantities of liquor and a motorcycle. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, that the seized liquor was …

Khalil SaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Khalil Sai applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 120 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was …

Mahi Yadav @ Mahendra Kumar @ Modi Yadav @ Madi YadavversusThe State Of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Mahi Yadav, was charged under several IPC offences and provisions of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for an alleged caste‑based assault on 8 January 2024. The FIR was lodged ten days later, and the appellant contended that the delay and the nature of the allegations indicated …

Dinesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Dinesh Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in an excise case (PS No.161 of 2000) under Section 47(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The court noted that the case dates back to the year 2000 and that regular bail processes under Sections 82 and 83 of the Criminal …

Lalti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Lalti Devi, the owner of a scooty from which 20 litres of liquor were recovered, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 (as amended in 2022). She argued that she had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of …

Manoj Kumar Data @ Manoj Kumar DuttaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Kumar Data, the owner of a licensed liquor shop in Dhanbad, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 1,400 litres of liquor from a "magic vehicle." …

Ishwar ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three residents of Rohtas district, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 180 litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard. They argued that they were not in possession of the …

Aakash Kumar @ Aakash Kumar Singh @ Vivek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Aakash Kumar and Bittu Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 206 litres of liquor from a vehicle. They argued that they were not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in their …

Kunil Yadav @ Sunil YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Kunil Yadav applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 47.5 litres of liquor and a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, the seized vehicle does not belong to him, and the only evidence against him is a …

Nitesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nitesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 45 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 4.77 litres of liquor. He argued that no liquor was recovered from his possession and the case was based solely on a confessional statement of …

Akhilesh RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Akhilesh Ram, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 7,662.6 litres of liquor from a truck and five pickup vehicles. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in …

Rajababu SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The appellants, a group of brothers and a sister from Dharampur, were charged under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC sections for alleged assault with weapons at the informant's house. They contended that the allegations were false, that the injuries were caused by blunt …

Rajesh Yadav @ Rajesh RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rajesh Yadav sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a), 38(1) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 756.72 litres of liquor from his house, outhouse and a container vehicle. He …

Gaytri DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gaytri Devi, sought anticipatory bail after a police case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleged that 4.32 litres of liquor were recovered from her joint family house and 360 ml from Anuj Kumar. The petitioner, a woman with one prior case, argued that she had no …

Mukesh ManjhiversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Manjhi was implicated in a case (PS No. 253 of 2021) for allegedly possessing eight litres of liquor, alleged offences under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner claimed he had a clean antecedent, that the liquor …

Ashok sardarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ashok Sardar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 53.875 litres of liquor from his residence, which is a joint family property. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that he was not arrested at the scene, no liquor was found in his …

Mahanth KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mahanth Kumar, a resident of West Champaran, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering nine litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he had no conscious possession, was not the vehicle's owner, and that the only link to him …

Sanjit Kumar @ Anish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging possession of 750 litres of liquor recovered from ten motorcycles, with the petitioner owning one of the vehicles. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware of his …

Bharat SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Bharat Singh, the owner of a motorcycle from which 35 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered, feared arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He contended that he was not present at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and he was unaware …

Ranjit Kumar @ Ranjit RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjit Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 150 litres of liquor from a vehicle registered in his mother’s name. He argued that he was not in possession of the vehicle at the time, was unaware of his friend’s alleged misuse, …

Bihari Kumar @ Amit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bihari Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 111.6 litres of liquor from a public field. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, had a clean antecedent, and was implicated by a …

Dharmendra Kumar @ Dharmendra RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 178.200 litres of liquor recovered from a hut that does not belong to him. He has seven prior criminal cases and was not arrested at the …

Dhanjee YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three residents of Ishivipur, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 12 litres of liquor. They argued that they were not apprehended at the spot, no liquor was found in their possession, and the alleged …

Dinkar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dinkar Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 167.4 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He contended that he had a clean antecedent and that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, asserting that he …

Ravi Kumar @ Ravi ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravi Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 20 litres of liquor from a plastic bag. He contended that the liquor was not found in his possession, the bag belonged to …

Sattan Prasad VermaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sattan Prasad Verma, sought anticipatory bail after a police case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleged that 90 litres of liquor were recovered from a scooty he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, …

Sanjay Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Sanjay Kumar Singh, owner of two pickup vehicles, was implicated in a case alleging the seizure of 259.200 litres and 291.720 litres of liquor from his vehicles under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession …

Gaurav Kumar @ Butan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gaurav Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where six litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a scooty not owned by him. He argued that the seizure was based on secret information and that no …

Chhotu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Chhotu Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail petition. The court, after hearing counsel, granted permission to withdraw the application. Consequently, …

Manoj Kumar @ Manoj RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Arms Act and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, arising from a land‑dispute incident involving alleged firing and assault. The petitioner contended that he was …

Pintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Pintu Kumar, a resident of Nalanda, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 28 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that he had a clean antecedent, the liquor was not found in his immediate …

Awdesh Sah @ Avdhesh SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Awdesh Sah applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, where 141.6 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was …

Vikash Rai @ Vikesh Kumar @ Vikesh Kumar RayversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Vikash Rai, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail petition. The learned counsel for the State opposed the withdrawal. The Court, after hearing both sides, …

Chaitu ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chaitu Manjhi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a)(c) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 20 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that he had no conscious possession, the …

Parwati DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Parwati Devi sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 5 litres of liquor from her house, which she claims is joint family property and that she had no conscious possession. She argued that the amendment to …

Gulzar Ansari @ GulzanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gulzar Ansari, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 288 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a vehicle not owned by him. He argued that the police had no …

Nand Kishore YadavversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nand Kishore Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 317(5) of the BNSS and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, relating to alleged recovery of 639 litres of liquor from a vehicle he did not own. He argued that he …

KUNDAN KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of 29.1 litres of liquor from a scooty registered in his father's name. The petitioner argued that he was not …

Bittu Kumar @ Bittu RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Bittu Kumar and Umesh Rai, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 110 litres of liquor from the roof of a house that is part of a joint family property. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not arrested at the …

Prabhat Sharma @ Prabhat KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Prabhat Sharma, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging offences under several IPC sections (468, 471, 420, 414, 34) and the Bihar Excise Act (30(a), 32, 36, 41) relating to the alleged recovery of 5,951.880 litres of liquor from five vehicles. He contended that he …

Rekha DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rekha Devi was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 15 litres of liquor recovered from her joint family house. She argued that the liquor was not in her conscious possession, the house is jointly owned, and the 2018 amendment to the Excise Act …

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Nitish Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. During the hearing, his counsel requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail and instead surrender to face regular bail proceedings. The Court granted the request, allowing the withdrawal and directing that …

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after a vehicle he owned was seized containing 328.5 liters of liquor, alleged to be a violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not present at the spot of seizure, and was unaware of …

Daroga RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Daroga Rai and Moti Rai, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 50 litres of liquor and 5,000 litres of semi‑prepared liquor from a bamboo orchard. They sought anticipatory bail, arguing that the liquor was not in their …

Benga SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three residents of Pakaridayal, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 75 litres of liquor from the shop of petitioner No. 3. They argued that the liquor was seized in the absence of …

Shahil Roy @ Sahil RayversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shahil Roy applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 201.75 litres of liquor from two vehicles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the …

Poonam DeviversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Poonam Devi filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from a police station case in Supaul. She later approached the High Court seeking permission to withdraw that application. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Vivek Kumar, requested the court’s leave to withdraw, …

Anuj SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Anuj Singh, the owner of a motorcycle from which 8 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware of his …

Shiokant Devi @ Shivkanti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shiokant Devi, owner of an auto, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 210 litres of liquor from her vehicle. She argued that she had no knowledge of the liquor, was not in possession, and had a clean criminal record, …

Panna Kumar @ Rakesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Panna Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for allegedly possessing 9.5 litres of liquor recovered from his joint‑family house. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, that no liquor was found in his conscious …

Pawan Kumar @ Pawan RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Pawan Kumar and Niraj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 300 litres of liquor. They contended they were not arrested on the spot, had no conscious possession of …

Pramila Devi @ Parmila DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pramila Devi, sought anticipatory bail after a motorcycle she owned was seized with 98.6 litres of liquor, alleged to be a violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. She argued that she had no prior criminal record, was not present at the …

Vijay MahatoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vijay Mahato was implicated in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 849.54 litres of liquor and a motorcycle, with six prior excise cases among a total of seven criminal antecedents. He was not arrested at the scene and the prosecution’s case relied on a …

Mahendra SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mahendra Singh, a resident of Aurangabad, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 30(c) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 4 litres of liquor and destruction of 60 litres of fermented jaggery solution from a hut that does not belong to him. He contended that he had no …

Vakil MusharversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Vakil Mushar and Jitendra Mushar sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018-22 alleging recovery of six litres of liquor from their joint family house. They argued that no arrest was made at the scene, no …

Raju Tiwari @ Guddu TiwariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raju Tiwari, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging recovery of 20 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his shop. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his …

Sonu Nut @ Sonu NatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three residents of Bajit Bhoraha, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 120 litres of liquor and 2000 litres of Mahua pass. They contended that the alleged seizure was from a public …

Talib Ali @ Taleb AliversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Talib Ali was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for the alleged recovery of 855 litres of liquor from a pickup vehicle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and …

Pankaj Kumar ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The appellant, Pankaj Kumar Thakur, filed a criminal appeal (SJ) No.3376 of 2025 before the Patna High Court arising from a 2023 complaint case in Bhagalpur. During the hearing on 6 January 2026, the appellant’s counsel sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the appeal and to surrender, …

Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 41.6 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and …

Rajesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 160 litres of liquor from his auto. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at …

Ram Ekbal YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ram Ekbal Yadav applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 78 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. He has four prior excise cases and is alleged to have been involved in the recovery of 135 litres of liquor from …

Dipu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dipu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016 for alleged recovery of 89.675 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had no prior …

Varisalal Yadav @ Baris Lal Yadav @ Vagis Lal YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Varisalal Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging possession of 225 litres of liquor recovered from two motorcycles, charging him under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He …

Guddu Dhangad @ Guddu DhangarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Dhangad applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 45.700 litres of liquor from his joint‑family house. The petitioner asserted a clean antecedent and argued that the …

Dinesh RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dinesh Rai, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act for the alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was …

Chhakku Chaudhary @ Chhaku ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Chhakku Chaudhary sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 47(a)(f) of the Bihar Excise Act, 1915, alleging recovery of liquor from a hut not belonging to him and no conscious possession. He argued that the police had mechanically implicated him without proper …

Ajit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajit Kumar, was implicated in an excise case (Case No. 314/2025) for alleged recovery of 169.660 litres of liquor from a cowshed belonging to his brother. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, that no liquor was found in his possession, and that the only evidence was a …

Yogi Manjhi @ Yogi MajhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Yogi Manjhi, was implicated in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor recovered from a joint family house, with the prosecution alleging recovery of 5 litres of liquor and 40 litres of Naushadhar solution. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not in …

Sadanand KamatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Sadanand Kamat and Nitish Kumar Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. The court allowed the withdrawal of the application for petitioner No.2 after his arrest, and dismissed that part of …

Jitendra ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jitendra Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 95 litres of liquor near a toilet, which he claims was not in his possession and was reported by a chowkidar. He has two prior cases …

Arun Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Arun Kumar Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of three litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested …

Manjeet Kumar @ Manjit Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manjeet Kumar sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 433.340 litres of liquor from a Tata Sumo. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in his …

Amit Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Amit Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 480 litres of liquor from his Scorpio. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not present at the spot of seizure, …

Satyendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Satyendra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 405.36 litres of liquor from three vehicles he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rahul Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 25 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, was unaware of his friend's misuse of the vehicle, and …

Anuj Kumar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anuj Kumar Mahto, was implicated in a case (PS Case No. 275 of 2025) for alleged recovery of 2,700 litres of spirit from his Bolero pickup vehicle under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the seized liquor, and …

Fuljhari DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Fuljhari Devi, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging recovery of ten litres of liquor from a village area not under her exclusive control. She asserted a clean criminal record and argued that the liquor was not in her …

Reshmi DeviversusThe State of BIhar

DISPOSED

Reshmi Devi and Gaurav Kumar, the wife and son of Pawan Sah, filed a petition fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 132, 121(2) and 3(5) of the BNS and Sections 37 and 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. They argued that they have clean antecedents, were not …

Kamlesh SahuversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Kamlesh Sahu sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, for the alleged recovery of 1,260 pieces of illicit liquor from his auto. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the scene, and …

VIKASH KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vikash Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor recovered from a motorcycle and his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, he was not the owner of the vehicle, and the house was joint …

Bikki Saw @ Bikki Shah @ Vikki SawversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bikki Saw, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 36 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, relating to the alleged recovery of 909 litres of liquor from a truck. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the …

Teni SoniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Teni Soni, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 13 litres of liquor recovered from his joint‑family house. He argued that no arrest was made at the scene, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and the …

Sanjay Rai @ Sanjay PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjay Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 7 litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the …

Lal Mohan Ray @ Lalmohan RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Lal Mohan Ray applied for anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 103.86 litres of liquor from a location not owned by him. The petitioner claimed he was not in possession of the liquor and that the complaint was filed by a hostile …

Sunaina DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunaina Devi, feared arrest in a case alleging possession of 7.5 litres of liquor under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. She contended that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that the liquor was found in a joint family house, not in her …

Biru Kumar @ Biru Yadav @ Akhilesh Rai @ Akhilesh RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Biru Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that the alleged 13.8 litres of liquor was recovered from a public place and not from his possession, and that the only evidence was a confessional …

BIPIN KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bipin Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of liquor from a mini‑truck, a car and a motorcycle seized from a poultry farm. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, that the seized items were …

DHARAM RAJ KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, D.R. Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging the seizure of 2,289 litres of liquor from a mini‑truck, a car and a motorcycle linked to his poultry farm. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, that none of the liquor was found in …

Chandrashekhar Singh @ C. D. Singh @ Chandeshwar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Chandrashekhar Singh sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, for alleged recovery of 7.38 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, he did not own …

Sudama YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The appellants Sudama, Krishna and Dhirendra Yadav appealed under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against a refusal of anticipatory bail. The informant alleged that the accused assaulted him and his brother over a land dispute, with claims of caste‑based abuse. The …

Budha Singh @ Rupesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Budha Singh, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging that liquor was recovered from a public place and not from his possession. He argued that the police relied on secret information and had not conducted a …

GAURI SHANKAR RAYversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Gauri Shankar Ray, a 70‑year‑old member of a Scheduled Caste, was charged under IPC sections 341, 323, 504 and 506 and Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting the son of an informant. The police, invoking Section 41A of the Cr.P.C., did not arrest him …

Golu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Golu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 430.50 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He contended that he had no prior criminal …

Raj Bali Manjhi @ Bali ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioners, five individuals from East Champaran, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, they were arrested. The petitioners then sought the court's permission to withdraw their anticipatory bail plea. The court, after hearing …

Rameshwar Ram @ Rameshar RamversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Rameshwar Ram, was implicated in a criminal case (PS Case No.256/2025) and filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and to surrender to the trial …

Santosh Sah @ Santosh Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, a group of family members from Neuri Tola Navtoliya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 303(2), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023. They alleged that the FIR was false, stemming from a property dispute in which the …

Manoj SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three residents of Dumri Kala, filed an anticipatory bail application in a case registered under multiple sections of the BNS, 2023, alleging assault and related offences. Petitioners 1 and 3 withdrew their applications, while petitioner 2, Jhunu Singh, sought anticipatory bail, …

Amarjeet Ram @ Amarjeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Amarjeet Ram applied for anticipatory bail in a criminal case arising from PS Sarairanjan. During proceedings, he sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and to surrender, intending to apply for regular bail. The Court, after hearing counsel, granted permission to withdraw …

Santosh Kumar @ LangaraversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Santosh Kumar and his sister Guriya Devi, filed anticipatory bail applications in a case registered under Sections 8 and 20(b)(ii)B of the NDPS Act. Santosh withdrew his application, which the court allowed, resulting in its dismissal. Guriya, a woman with a clean record, claimed …

Chhotu Kumar Rai @ Sanjiv Kumar Rai @ Chhotu RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, five individuals from Manihari, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 354A, 308, 504, 506 and 34 of the IPC. They argued that the police had investigated the matter under Section 41A of the CrPC without arresting them, and only after …

Putul DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Putul Devi sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a murder case involving alleged dowry demands, where the informant, the deceased's sister-in-law, alleged that the petitioner participated in strangling the victim. The petitioner argued she has a clean record, the informant is …

Amar Manjhi @ Amar Kumar Manjhi @ Amar Kumar ManjhversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Amar Manjhi, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged theft of goods worth Rs. 7 lakh from his own house. He claimed to have a clean antecedent, asserted that he was working in Delhi at the time of the …

Muklesh RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, Muklesh Rai and Biresh Kumar Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Case No. 235 of 2024) under Sections 303(2) and 317(2) of the BNS, 2023, relating to alleged illegal sand mining. They argued they have clean antecedents and were falsely implicated, …

Ganesh Kumar @ Ganesh Yadav @ Ganesh Prasad YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Ganesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered in 2017 for offences under Sections 395 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that the FIR named him only on the basis of a confessional statement of a co‑accused. He claimed a clean antecedent and that the alleged …

Naimullah Ansari @ Nimullah AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Naimullah Ansari, filed an anticipatory bail application under the criminal procedure. During the hearing, he sought permission to withdraw that application and instead surrender to face trial, intending to apply for regular bail. The court granted his request, allowing the …

Gulab YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Gulab Yadav applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging his involvement in a dacoity plan involving firearms, with charges under Sections 310(4), 310(5), 132 of the B.N.S. and Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act. The police raid recovered cartridges and arrested three co‑accused, …

Nek Mohammad MianversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nek Mohammad Mian, applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging violations of Sections 33, 41 and 42 of the Indian Forest Act and Sections 2, 9, 27, 29, 31, 39 and 51 of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, for alleged grazing of his cattle in a forest that led to the destruction …

Ramayan SaoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ramayan Sao and his wife Sushila Devi, senior citizens and father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a dowry‑death case registered under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. They argued that the informant, the victim’s mother, was …

Irfan AliversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Irfan Ali, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR alleged his involvement in kidnapping a girl for marriage, invoking IPC sections 363, 366(A), 34 and POCSO sections 8 and 17. The petitioner claimed a clean record and argued that the alleged victim, initially said to be 17, later …

Vikram KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Vikram Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. He later approached the Court seeking permission to withdraw that application and to surrender, requesting regular bail thereafter. The Court allowed the withdrawal, dismissed the anticipatory bail as withdrawn, and …

Rupesh Kumar @ Bittu Singh @ Biddu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The appellants were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act for allegedly assaulting an informant, abusing his caste, and stealing a locket while a land dispute was in progress. They filed an …

Manoj UraonversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Uraon applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for possession of liquor. The petitioner argued he had a clean antecedent, the liquor was recovered from a joint family house, and no conscious possession was …

Vinay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vinay Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after a car owned by him was seized containing 231.75 litres of liquor, leading to charges under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Excise Act. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his …

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Excise Act for allegedly possessing 18 litres of liquor. He argued that he had no ownership of the seized vehicle, was not arrested on the spot, and the police had implicated …

Amit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Amit Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was …

Sanket Sahani @ Sanket SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Sanket Sahani and Saroj Sahani, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor and Mahua from a public pond. They contended that they were not …

Rahul SoniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Rahul Soni and Deepak Kumar Soni, brothers, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of five litres of beer from a car. They argued they have clean antecedents, were …

Mithu @ Mithun Kumar @ Mithun MandalversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Mithu, the petitioner, filed an anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Procedure Code. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner’s counsel sought the court’s permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court granted the permission to …

Chandan ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandan Thakur, was implicated in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for alleged recovery of 23.700 litres of liquor from his shop. He has two prior cases under the same Act and feared arrest. He argued that the liquor was recovered in his absence and …

Amal Singh @ Amal SinghaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Amal Singh, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 161.400 litres of liquor from a Maruti Swift owned by him. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and had no …

Bunty Kumar @ Bunty SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bunty Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly possessing 54 litres of liquor recovered from a cowshed on his premises. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in his …

Rimani KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rimani Kumari was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 1.5 litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned. She contended that she had no conscious possession of the liquor, had a clean antecedent, and was unaware that a friend misused her …

Ashan NijamiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ashan Nijami, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 9.250 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, …

Rohit Kumar @ Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Rohit Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case. During the hearing, his counsel requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail and to surrender, seeking regular bail instead. The Court granted the request, dismissing the anticipatory bail petition as withdrawn and …

Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Santosh Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case concerning alleged seizure of liquor. The State argued that the FIR described seizure of 60 litres from a motorcycle, whereas the impugned order recorded seizure of 35 litres from the petitioner's house, …

Pankaj Kumar @ Pankaj Sahni @ Pankaj Kumar SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with offences under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Excise Act, alleging that 82.35 litres of liquor were recovered from his XUV 500 vehicle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was …

Rahul KumarversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rahul Kumar, owner of a motorcycle from which 30 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, had no knowledge of his friend's alleged misuse of the vehicle, …

Raju RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Raju Ray sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under IPC sections 272 and 273 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018 (sections 30(a), 32(2) and 41(1). He alleged that the liquor seizure of 175 litres from a Bolero vehicle was based solely on a statement by Digvijay …

Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 111.9 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the …

Kanhaiya Rai @ Kanhaiya YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kanhaiya Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 400 litres of spirit were allegedly recovered from a location adjacent to his house. He argued that the police had mechanically implicated him without …

Dablu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dablu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 1,093.01 litres of liquor recovered from a room in a shop run by his brother. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, no liquor was found in …