Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
5892 judgments · newest first · showing 5801–5892
Petitioner Saurav Kumar had filed an anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Procedure Code. During the hearing, he requested permission to withdraw that application and instead surrender to the trial court to seek regular bail. The Court, after hearing counsel, granted the request, …
The petitioner, Md Noor Alam, the owner of a vehicle from which 259.200 litres of liquor were seized, applied for anticipatory bail, claiming he had no knowledge of the liquor being in his vehicle and possesses a clean criminal record. The State opposed the bail, arguing the seizure implicated the …
The petitioner, Suraj Ram, was implicated in a case alleging possession of 43.41 litres of liquor, 19.5 litres of beer and a motorcycle, offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 32(2) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He contended that the liquor was stored in a …
The petitioner, Ritesh Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for the alleged recovery of 21 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, had a clean antecedent, and was unaware that …
The petitioner, Sikinder Mahto, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging recovery of 50 litres of liquor from his meat shop, alleged to violate Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession, the …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 30 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in …
The petitioner, Radheshyam Sharma, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act after 99.9 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle and that the seizure was not from his conscious …
Shaida Khatun, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, where 57,600 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a motorcycle she owned. She argued that she had no conscious possession of the liquor, had a clean …
Munna Kumar was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. He sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application after his arrest. The court considered whether a petitioner may withdraw an anticipatory bail application after being taken …
The petitioner, Prem Raj, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged possession of 4.86 litres of liquor and seizure of his scooty. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious …
The petitioner, Bhola Kumar Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016‑22 (Amended) concerning alleged recovery of 10,200 litres of liquor from a sack placed on a public street adjacent to his shop. He argued that he was …
Golden Kumar and his wife Puja Kumari applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 alleging that 31.140 litres of liquor were recovered from their house and 25.500 litres from a Toto vehicle parked …
The petitioner, Santosh Sahani, feared arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 94 litres of liquor from a boat. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the boat, and had …
The petitioner, Ramji Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from his house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, and that the 2018 …
The petitioner, Brijlal Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application in the Patna High Court after being implicated in a criminal case (PS. Case No.-228 Year-2025). While the application was pending, the petitioner was arrested by the police. The petitioner then sought the Court's permission to …
The petitioner, Satyendra Patel, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 20 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which he claims is joint family property and that he had no knowledge or possession of the liquor. He asserted a clean criminal …
Mehsi Devi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where liquor was allegedly recovered from a joint family house. The petitioner argued she had no conscious possession, the …
The petitioners, nine individuals from Kasba, Purnea, were charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly demolishing a house, assaulting relatives, and looting cash on 18 April 2025. They applied for anticipatory bail, claiming they have clean antecedents and were falsely …
The petitioner, Bajrangi Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 118(1) and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes (BNS). He claimed a clean antecedent and alleged that the informant, an agnate with whom he had a property …
The petitioners, five residents of Sabalpur village, feared arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Sale (BNSS) relating to alleged illegal sand mining and assault on police. They claimed they were falsely implicated, stating that the tractor involved belonged to …
The petitioners, three residents of Goraipur, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with a case involving alleged assault and firing that resulted in the death of a minor informant. The informant claimed the petitioners were present when her brother was assaulted and a firearm …
Mantu Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (PS‑181/2025) involving offences under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The informant alleged that Yadav called him, a confrontation ensued and Yadav fired a weapon, injuring the …
The petitioners, five Yadavs from Gaya, applied for anticipatory bail after being named in an FIR for offences under IPC sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 121(2), 132 and 109, stemming from a police raid on illegal sand mining where a sand‑mafia allegedly attacked police personnel. They contended that …
Bipin Yadav applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2)(3), 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that he was falsely implicated in an assault and firing incident involving the informant's husband. The informant claimed …
The petitioners, a group of individuals accused in a land dispute case, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest under multiple sections of the Bihar Non-Compromise of Offences Act. One petitioner, Harendra Sah, withdrew his application after being arrested, and the court dismissed his bail …
The petitioner, Dilkhush Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and the Arms Act, alleging that he was implicated in the manufacturing of illegal weapons based solely on the confessional statements of co‑accused arrested …
The petitioners, Jagdambi Yadav and his son Dharmendra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No.166/2025) involving multiple IPC offences including assault, robbery and attempt to murder. They claimed to have clean antecedents, argued that the informant was a relative with …
The petitioner, Md. Saddam, filed an anticipatory bail application in the Patna High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead surrender to seek regular bail. The Court granted the request, dismissing the …
Vinay Kumar Singh, the petitioner, faced criminal proceedings under PS Case No.694 of 2025. He filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. During the hearing, senior counsel for the petitioner requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application, stating that …
The petitioner, Priyanshu Kumar Singh, a student with a clean record, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a violent incident alleged by an informant. The informant claimed that a group of accused, including the petitioner, fired at him and assaulted his brother, allegedly over a …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after the police alleged that 26.1 litres of liquor were recovered from two motorcycles linked to him. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and that the case against him was based …
The petitioners, five residents of Eatahari village, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Section 27 of the Arms Act. They alleged that the FIR was filed by …
Gold Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Procedure Code. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner, through counsel, sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The learned counsel for the State …
Petitioner Pawan Tiwari, a retired army personnel, feared arrest in a criminal case (Shahpur P.S. Case No.158/2025) involving multiple offences under the B.N.S., 2023. He alleged that the informant falsely implicated him, claiming a raid on his house on 16 June 2025 where his family allegedly …
The petitioner, Saddam Miyan, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 225 litres of liquor from an auto. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at …
Manoj Kumar Yadav and Nitish Kumar Mandal applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 274, 275, 317(5) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging the recovery of 108 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. The petitioners argued that they were not …
The petitioner, Ranjit Rai, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case involving offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 354, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 37(b)(c) of the Excise Act. He alleged that the informant, his aunt, fabricated the complaint due to a …
The petitioner, Subodh Chauhan, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession …
The petitioner, Abhinandan Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act involving the alleged recovery of 1080 litres of liquor from two vehicles he owned. He argued that he was not present at the time of …
The petitioner, Sikender Sahani, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(A) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of 122.7 litres of liquor from his joint family house. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested, the …
The petitioner, Pappu Kumar Rai, owner of a bus, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 22.5 litres of liquor from his vehicle. He was not arrested at the spot and did not have the liquor in his conscious possession; the allegation arose solely …
Sanjeev Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor from his semi‑constructed house and from another person's house. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested, no liquor …
The petitioner, Ankit Raj, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 250 litres of liquor in a Santro car. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, the vehicle was not his, and the only basis for his implication was a confessional …
Manish Kumar Singhania applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging that 2,479.2 litres of liquor were recovered from two trucks, one of which he owned. He argued that he was not present at the spot of seizure, had no conscious possession …
The petitioner, Laxman Yadav, was implicated in a case (PS Case No. 444 of 2025) for alleged offences under Section 317(5) of the BNS, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, involving the recovery of 108 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not apprehended at the …
The petitioner, Kamal Sahni, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 40 litres of liquor and 6,000 litres of fermented Mahua solution from a public place. He asserted that he has a clean criminal record, was not caught in possession, and that the …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 58.1 litres of liquor from a government school corner. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no possession, …
The petitioner, Sanjay Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for alleged recovery of 128.5 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had a clean …
Petitioner Rajnandan Bhagat applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor from a public canal. The petitioner claimed he had a clean antecedent, …
Vivek Ram was implicated in a case (P.S. Case No. 447 of 2025) for allegedly recovering 509 litres of liquor from a poultry farm, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner argued that he was not caught in possession, the recovery was made from a location adjacent to his premises, …
The petitioners, Shaligram Paswan and Nirdosh Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor. They contended that the liquor was not in their conscious possession, the recovery site did …
Petitioners Dhiraj Yadav and Navin Yadav sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 100 litres of liquor from a public canal area. They argued that the liquor was not in their possession, the informant’s identity was …
The petitioner, Asho Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 0.375 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the …
Mani Bhushan Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 171 litres of liquor from five sacks tied to a motorcycle. He contended that the police had not seized any liquor from his immediate possession and that the only information came from a …
Manoj Ray sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, where police alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from an auto and 20 litres from a scooty, none of which were in his possession. The petitioner argued he was not the …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from public places. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the alleged recovery …
Mahanth Chaudhary sought anticipatory bail after learning of a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 711 litres of liquor from a Bolero vehicle. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and that the …
The petitioners, Shaligram Paswan and Nirdosh Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and (c) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of liquor. They contended that they were not caught in possession, the liquor was recovered from a public area, and …
The petitioner, Deepak Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 46 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that no arrest was made at the scene, no liquor was found in his conscious possession, and …
The petitioner, Jitendra Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Procedure Code. During the hearing, his counsel found difficulty in arguing and requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead surrender to seek regular bail. The Court granted …
The petitioner, Abhimanyu Paul, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 56(b) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 108 litres of liquor from his Hyundai car. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor, was not in possession of it, and that the seizure was solely …
Tunni Devi applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act alleging possession of six litres of liquor at her residence, which is a joint family property. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the …
The petitioner, Sitaram Bind, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 21.5 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that he had no conscious possession, has a clean antecedent, and …
The petitioner, Roopu Ram, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 11.25 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and that …
The petitioner, Kanhaiya Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 8.1 litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the liquor, …
The petitioner, Kallu Khatik, sought anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for alleged recovery of ten litres of liquor from a public place. He contended that the liquor was not in his …
Santosh Kumar, facing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of 135 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, applied for anticipatory bail. He contended that the seized vehicle was not in his possession, he was not the owner, and his …
The petitioner, Santosh Kumar, feared arrest in a case registered under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, alleging recovery of 171 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He contended that he was not present at …
Petitioners Rajan Kumar and Sonu Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 for allegedly recovering 12.6 litres of liquor from an orchard. They argued they had no conscious possession, were not owners of the …
The petitioner, Binod Ram, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 0.72 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a third party, Suraj, …
Manti Devi, the owner of a motorcycle from which 150 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered, feared arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. She argued that she had no prior criminal record, was unaware of her friend's alleged misuse of the vehicle, and that mere …
Manoj Chaupal applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging recovery of 720 litres of liquor from four motorcycles, with charges under Sections 274, 275 and 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, …
The petitioner, Dinkar Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 6.84 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, …
Petitioner Chhotu Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 24 litres of liquor from a sack. He argued he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was recovered from a place not belonging to him, and the only evidence is a …
Guddu Mishra sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 25.76 litres of liquor from his residence, which he claims is a joint family property and that he had no conscious possession of the liquor. He argued that the …
The petitioner, Raushan Kumar, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 18 litres of liquor from a scooty he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, …
Jaspreet Singh, the owner of a vehicle from which 3,438 litres of liquor were seized, was charged under several IPC provisions (188, 420, 467, 468, 471/34) and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act (30(a), 32(i)(ii), 41). He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming a clean antecedent and that he was …
Manju Devi, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from a public place. She argued that the liquor was not found in her possession, the FIR did not name her, and she had only two …
Mukesh Sahni sought anticipatory bail after the police alleged that liquor was recovered from his straw house in violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in his immediate possession, and that the straw …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar Dev, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, for the alleged recovery of 114.9 litres of liquor from his auto. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not …
The petitioners, Vinod Yadav and Badhu Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 25 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. They argued they had no possession of the liquor, were not the owners of the vehicle, and were implicated solely …
Petitioner Pintu Paswan sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 30 litres of liquor and destruction of 1500 litres of semi‑fermented mahua. The petitioner claimed a clean antecedent, argued that no arrest was made, …
The petitioner, Ful Kumari Devi, owner of a motorcycle from which 102.375 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail under Sections 274, 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. She argued that she had a clean antecedent, was a …
Abdul Barik applied for anticipatory bail before the Patna High Court. During the hearing, his counsel requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead surrender to obtain regular bail. The Court granted the request, allowing the withdrawal and directing that the …
Birendra Rai, the owner of a vehicle from which 261.54 litres of liquor were seized, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being transported, was not in possession at the time of …
Naval Kishor Yadav applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging recovery of 2006.64 litres of liquor from a pick‑up and a motorcycle. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious possession …
Petitioner Pradip Chaudhary was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 25 litres of liquor and 180 litres of fermented Jawa Mahua recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He applied for anticipatory …
The petitioner, Afroz, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, where 4 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not arrested on the spot, and …
The petitioners, Ankit Kumar and Aniket Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. During the hearing, their counsel requested permission to withdraw the application, preferring to surrender and seek regular bail. The Court granted the request, dismissing the …
Randhir Kumar, the owner of two scooties from which 70 litres of liquor were seized, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C., claiming he had no conscious possession of the liquor and was unaware that others misused his vehicles. He argued that his clean antecedent and lack …
The petitioners, employees of Masters Development Management (India) Private Ltd, were named in an FIR filed by Tapovardhan Prakritik Chikitsa Kendra alleging breach of a construction contract, overcharging and non‑completion of work. They contended that the dispute was civil, governed by an …
Arvind Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court seeking relief against the State of Bihar. No counsel or party appeared on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated calls. The State was represented by Advocate Mr. Bharat Lal. The presiding judge noted the absence of …
