Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
383 judgments · newest first · showing 201–383
The appellants were convicted by the Sessions Court for offences under Sections 341 and 307 read with Section 34 of the IPC for allegedly assaulting an informant and his father with various weapons. The prosecution relied on the testimony of relatives of the complainant and medical reports showing …
The appellant Kanhaiya Yadav appealed against his conviction under Section 323 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing a pistol at the informant and his brother. The trial court had sentenced him to one year imprisonment for the IPC offence and three years with a fine for the …
Mithun Singh was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Katihar, for rape under Section 376 of the IPC based primarily on the victim's testimony and the evidence of an eye‑witness (PW‑2) and certain documents (Ekrarnama). The victim alleged that Singh forcibly entered her house, assaulted and …
The appellant Chunmun Chaudhary appealed against his conviction and sentence for an offence under Section 308 of the Indian Penal Code, imposed by the Additional Sessions Judge. The prosecution alleged that the appellant stabbed the informant's brother during a dispute over turmeric, while the …
The appellant, Atendra Kumar, was convicted for attempting to rape an 11‑year‑old girl on 14 April 2012 in a wheat field near her village. The victim testified that the appellant chased her, caught hold of her, pushed her to the ground, and tried to open her pants before villagers intervened and the …
The petitioners, Md. Haider Ali and his wife Husne Ara Haidri, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash an order of the SDJM, Hajipur that had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 376 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code based on a complaint …
The petitioners, a group of family members, filed an interlocutory application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a Judicial Magistrate's order that had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 323, 341, 379, 380, 354(A) and 34 of the IPC based on a complaint …
The petitioner, Ravi Chandra, filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and Punjab National Bank. The application sought certain reliefs, but the petitioner later requested permission to withdraw the application while retaining the right to …
Triloki Nath Singh filed Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No.25683 of 2017 arising from a police case in Rohtas district. The petitioner, through counsel, sought the court's permission to withdraw the petition. The learned counsel for the State opposed the withdrawal. The Hon'ble Justice Shailendra …
Krishna Mani Devi filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the cognizance order dated 12‑04‑2016 of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC arising from a disputed land transaction. The petitioner …
Anil Kumar, then SHO of Muffasil Police Station, raided the house of Shabroon Nisha on secret information and recovered numerous firearms and related equipment. Members of the household protested and allegedly assaulted police, leading to a complaint under IPC sections 323, 341 and 504. The trial …
The petitioners, who are in‑laws of the complainant, sought to quash an order dated 11‑07‑2016 that had taken cognizance of offences under Section 498A of the IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act against them. They argued that the complainant’s statement did not allege any specific role …
Sunil Kumar filed a petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate that had taken cognizance of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioner argued that the proviso to Section 138, clause (b), requiring a …
The petitioners, Manvendra Narayan Singh and others, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition challenging the disposal of their complaint case No. 901 of 2014. The trial court had disposed of the complaint under Section 239 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The petitioners, through counsel, sought …
Vivek Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous petition against the State of Bihar and two accused persons. After the trial of the accused concluded, the petitioner’s counsel sought the court’s permission to withdraw the pending application. The Hon’ble Justice Shailendra Singh considered the request …
A criminal miscellaneous petition (No. 59187 of 2017) was filed by Akhilesh Prasad Singh against the State of Bihar and Nandan Kumar, arising from a police case in Khagaria. The petitioner, through counsel, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The Court examined the request and …
The petitioner, Nirmala Devi, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court. During the hearing on 2 February 2026, counsel for the petitioner sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The sole issue before the Court was whether the petitioner could be allowed to …
The petitioners, Rajdeo Singh and Mrityunjay Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition and later sought the court's permission to withdraw the petition. Their counsel, Mr. Rajeev Kumar Singh, requested the withdrawal. The Hon'ble Justice Shailendra Singh granted the permission, resulting in the …
The petitioners, Afroj Khan and Tausif Khan, were charged in a criminal case but were acquitted by the trial court, while two co-accused were convicted. They had filed a petition challenging the trial court's order dated 16‑04‑2016 that rejected their prayer for discharge. The High Court, after …
The petitioners, a group of relatives, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition against the State of Bihar and Madhusudan Rai. During the proceedings, the petitioners’ counsel informed the court that the parties had reached a compromise, rendering the petition infructuous. The counsel requested that …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous petition (No.39128 of 2017) arising from a police case in Jamui. During the proceedings, the petitioners, through counsel, applied to the High Court for permission to withdraw the petition. The court considered the request and, finding no impediment, …
The petitioner, Gyanendra Kumar Singh, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the order of cognizance dated 22‑08‑2016 taken by the Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate against him for offences under IPC Sections 323, 498A read with 34 and Dowry Prohibition Act Sections 3 and …
The appellants, Raj Kumar Singh and Ram Kumar Singh, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Darbhanga, for assault (IPC 323), criminal intimidation (IPC 504) and, in the case of the first appellant, outraging the modesty of a woman (IPC 354). The prosecution’s case relied on the testimony …
The petitioner, Avinash Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case involving offences under Sections 392 and 395 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He argued that his trial had progressed very slowly, with only one prosecution witness examined after more than a year in custody, …
The petitioners Harendra Yadav, Shambhu Nath Yadav and Daya Shankar Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous petition (No.14639 of 2017) arising from a police case in Buxar. They later approached the High Court seeking permission to withdraw the petition. The sole issue before the court was whether the …
The petitioners Satish Kumar Rai and Vishwanath Rai filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court seeking relief. The trial court had already disposed of the case resulting in an acquittal of the petitioners. Consequently, the petitioners’ counsel requested permission to …
The petitioners, Kartik Singh and his sons, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and an individual named Satya Narayan Mahto. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners, while the respondent was represented by Advocate Renu Kumari. The …
The petitioner Anish Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous petition challenging an order dated 28 March 2014 in complaint case No. 850 of 2013. The High Court noted that the impugned order had already been disposed of on 4 August 2018. Since the matter was finally decided, the petition could no …
Ashok Kumar Verma filed a criminal miscellaneous petition in the Patna High Court. He later sought the court's permission to withdraw the petition. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Ashok Kumar Mishra, requested that the petition be withdrawn. The court considered whether a petitioner may be allowed to …
The petitioners, a group of family members, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition (No.33078 of 2017) arising from a police case in Bhojpur. After the underlying case was disposed, they sought the court's permission to withdraw the petition. The petition was presented before Hon'ble Justice …
Dr. Praveen Kumar Sinha filed a petition under Section 227 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking review of an order dated 10‑05‑2016 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge‑5th Lakhisarai, which had rejected his prayer. The trial court subsequently disposed of the case, rendering the order under …
The petitioners, Satya Vikash and others, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition (No.17016 of 2017) before the Patna High Court. On 30-01-2026, they applied for permission to withdraw the petition. The petitioners were represented by Mr. Nagmani Kumar, while the State of Bihar and the respondent …
Lakshman Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous petition in the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the case, the petitioner died. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition on account of the petitioner’s death. The court considered whether a petition can be withdrawn …
The petitioner, Soni Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court challenging the State of Bihar and Gyan Prakash. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The court examined the office report which showed that the trial of the accused had already concluded with …
The petitioner, Ramdev Sharma, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition (No.25367 of 2016) arising from a 1989 complaint case in Supaul. He later sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the petition. The matter was heard before Hon’ble Justice Shailendra Singh. The Court examined whether a criminal …
Rajesh Kumar filed a petition in the Patna High Court challenging an order passed in a criminal miscellaneous case (No.1209 of 2017) arising from a 2014 police case. The petition sought relief against the State of Bihar and Nimisha Gupta. The court observed that the impugned order had already been …
The petitioner, Muslim Alam, a 21‑year‑old with no prior criminal record, applied for regular bail in a case registered under sections 103, 3(5) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita concerning an alleged killing. His earlier bail plea had been rejected, and the investigating officer had made no …
The petitioners, Manish Kumar and Rudal Yadav, were arrested in Bihra Police Station Case No. 207/2023 for offences under IPC sections 364, 302, 120B and 201. They applied for regular bail, having previously been denied relief in July and September 2024. They argued that they had been in custody …
The petitioner, Sahida Khatoon, filed an application seeking restoration of Criminal Miscellaneous No. 24106 of 2025, which had been dismissed on 17‑12‑2025 for want of prosecution. The respondent State and a private party opposed the restoration. The court examined whether a dismissed criminal …
Vikash Kumar @ Mohit Yadav filed an application seeking restoration of Criminal Miscellaneous No. 64270 of 2025, which had been dismissed on 17-12-2025 for want of prosecution. The petitioner argued that the dismissal was premature and that the case should be reinstated to its original file. The …
The appellants were convicted under Sections 304 and 323 read with Section 149 of the IPC for a fatal assault allegedly stemming from a land dispute. The prosecution relied on injured witnesses and medical reports, while the defence highlighted stark contradictions between eyewitness accounts of …
The petitioners, Suma Devi, Raj Kumar Mondal and Indu Devi, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court seeking permission to withdraw the proceedings. They approached the court on 27-01-2026 through counsel Mr. Neeraj Kumar @ Sanidh and Mr. R.S. Pathak, requesting that the …
The petitioner, Umesh Dahlan, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition in the Patna High Court seeking relief. After the trial court issued a status report indicating that the case had been disposed of with the petitioner’s acquittal, the petitioner moved the High Court for permission to withdraw his …
The petitioners, a group of relatives from Buxar, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition arising from a complaint case (PS Case No. 282 of 2015). Their counsel, Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary, applied before the Patna High Court for permission to withdraw the petition. The court considered the request …
The petitioners, Md. Karimuddin and others, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court. They later approached the court seeking permission to withdraw the petition. The learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana, made the application. The court considered …
The petitioners, brothers Rajesh Kumar Jaiswal and Rajeev Kumar Jaiswal, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the order of the ACJM that took cognizance of offences under IPC Sections 341, 323, 504 and the SC/ST Act Section 3(1)(x) arising from a protest‑cum‑complaint …
Satyanarayan Yadav filed Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No.44880 of 2016 arising from PS Case No.256 of 2014 in the High Court of Patna. The petitioner, through counsel Mrs. Sunita Kumari, sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the petition. The sole issue before the Court was whether the …
The petitioners, including Gorelal Kumar and relatives, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition against the State of Bihar and Jaimala Devi. They later sought the court's permission to withdraw the petition. Counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha, made the application before Justice …
The petitioners, a group of residents from Village Bharatha Patti, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court. They later approached the court seeking permission to withdraw the petition. The sole issue before the court was whether it could grant such permission. The court, …
Md. Minhaj Alam filed a criminal miscellaneous petition in the Patna High Court arising from a 2012 case. He later sought the court's permission to withdraw the petition. The State of Bihar, as the opposite party, was represented but did not contest the withdrawal. The court considered the …
The petitioner Raju Paswan filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC challenging a order dated 24‑06‑2015 of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui, who had taken cognizance of offences under IPC Sections 341, 323, 504 and the Arms Act Section 25(1‑B)(a). The petitioner claimed that the matter …
Anwar Alam, the petitioner, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition in the Patna High Court. He later sought the court’s permission to withdraw the petition. The sole issue before the court was whether the petitioner could be allowed to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous petition. The court, after …
The petitioner, Bishwambhar Nath Rai, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the application. The Court, exercising its inherent jurisdiction, considered the request and found no …
The petitioners, Narayan Tiwari and others, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court. Subsequently, they approached the court seeking permission to withdraw the petition. The court examined its inherent jurisdiction to allow withdrawal of such petitions. It held that the …
The petitioners, six individuals from Sarma village, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition (No.21787 of 2016) against the State of Bihar. The petition was at the stage of evidence when they applied to withdraw it, seeking liberty to raise all grounds before the trial court during the hearing. The …
Urmila Devi and Anil Kumar filed Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No.14687 of 2017 arising out of Police Station case No.78 of 2016 in the High Court of Patna. The petitioners sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel for the State opposed the withdrawal. The …
The petitioners, a group of residents from Samastipur, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court. During the hearing, they sought permission to withdraw the petition and instead raise all their grounds before the trial court. The court considered whether such a withdrawal …
The petitioners, Dr. Dhiraj Sinha and Pankaj Kumar Sinha, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 21876 of 2016 arising from a 2013 police case. They later approached the Patna High Court seeking the court’s permission to withdraw the petition. The sole question before the court was whether it …
The petitioners, a group of relatives, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition in the Patna High Court. They later approached the court seeking permission to withdraw the petition. The learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Neeraj Kumar, submitted an application for withdrawal. The court …
The appellant Pramod Sao appealed against his conviction under Section 498‑A of the IPC for alleged dowry‑related cruelty. The trial court had relied on the complainant’s testimony that the appellant demanded Rs.2,00,000 and a refrigerator and subjected her to assault and confinement. On appeal, the …
The respondent, a senior railway officer, alleged that his basic pay was reduced in October 2020 from Rs 99,800 to Rs 86,100 without any order, and that the Railways had been recovering Rs 17,65,430 as excess payment for a period dating back to 2004. The Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) had …
The appellant, Md. Maksood Alam, was convicted under Section 135(1) of the Electricity Act, 2007 for alleged electricity theft at a plastic manufacturing unit and sentenced to three years’ rigorous imprisonment and a hefty fine. The prosecution’s case relied on the testimony of the raiding party and …
The appellant Mukesh Sharma was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge in a POCSO trial for offences under IPC sections 366, 376 and 323, and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment. He appealed, contending that the victim’s complaint was filed after an unexplained 26‑day delay, that the alleged …
Ravi Kumar was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 331(4) and 305(a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He contended that he was falsely implicated and that the sole basis for his charge was the confessional statement of co‑accused Golu Kumar Sinha, which he argued had no evidentiary …
Rambabu Ray, the father of the main accused, was charged under sections 140(3), 103(1), 238 and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita in a case concerning the death of the informant’s son. He applied for regular bail, contending that he was not named in the FIR and was implicated only through a …
The petitioner, Pankaj Kumar Yadav, applied for regular bail in a case registered under sections 8 and 20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act, alleging false implication for political reasons. He contended that the 1.8 kg of cannabis recovered was not in his conscious possession, that the quantity did not …
Sunil Kumar, accused under Sections 331(4), 305 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. for a theft case (Shivajinagar PS Case No. 59 of 2025), applied for regular bail claiming innocence and that his alleged confession was made only before a village panchayat. He argued that there were no eyewitnesses, the …
The petitioners, Abhishek Kumar Singh and Mannu Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under sections 309(4) and 317(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and sections 25(1B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. They contended that they were falsely implicated, no incriminating material was …
The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar, applied for regular bail in a kidnapping case registered under sections 137(2) and 140(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He argued that the only evidence against him was a confessional statement of a co‑accused and that no incriminating material was found in his …
Suraj Kumar applied for regular bail in a case involving offences under Sections 109, 309(6) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case is based solely on a confessional statement of a co‑accused, Manish Kumar, who had already been granted bail. No …
Vishal Kumar, a waiter, was charged under Section 307 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing a pistol at his employer, Manoj Kumar, causing a neck injury on 12 July 2015. The petitioner applied for regular bail, contending that the injury was simple, he had been in custody since …
Shantanu Kumar was arrested in connection with a case registered under sections 25(1B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, alleging that a firearm and cartridges were recovered from the asbestos sheet of his sweet shop. The petitioner applied for regular bail, contending that the seized items were not in …
The petitioner, Naushad Alam, applied for regular bail in a case registered under sections 317(4) and 317(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita concerning the alleged theft of a motorcycle. He contended that the FIR was fabricated by the police, that he purchased the motorcycle in good faith from a …
Petitioner Abhishek Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging recovery of six mobile phones and a motorcycle, but no stolen items were found in his possession and the seizure list was signed only by police witnesses. He has prior criminal cases but is already on bail in those matters and …
Bijay Kumar Bijay filed a criminal miscellaneous petition (No.90290 of 2025) arising from a police case in Munger. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Kumar Kamal Nayan, sought the court's permission to withdraw the petition. The State of Bihar, represented by an Assistant Public Prosecutor, did not …
Krishna Kumar was arrested on 10 August 2025 in connection with offences under Section 111 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and several sections of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. He applied for regular bail, claiming innocence, false implication, and a clean …
Kanti Devi, the mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, was arrested in a dowry‑death case (PS Case No. 165 of 2025) under Sections 80(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. She had been in custody since 25‑08‑2025. The FIR made no allegation of dowry demand and did not specify her role in the alleged killing, the …
Golu Kumar, a 19‑year‑old with no prior criminal record, applied for regular bail in a case registered under sections 87 and 96 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He was not named in the FIR and the investigation produced statements from three girls, recorded under section 180, denying his involvement; …
Ritik Raushan was arrested in connection with offences under sections 310(4), 310(5), 312 and 109(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and section 27 of the Arms Act. He contended that he was not named in the FIR, his name only appeared in a co‑accused’s confessional statement, he was absent from CCTV …
The petitioner, Satyam Vishwas, was arrested in connection with offences under sections 303(2) and 317(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and has been in custody since 23 August 2025. He applied for regular bail, contending that the case against him rests solely on suspicion, his past antecedents, …
The petitioner, Shambhu Chaudhry, applied for regular bail in a criminal miscellaneous case (No. 90187 of 2025) arising from a police report registered under Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He alleged that the FIR was lodged four months after the alleged incident, that the informant’s …
The petitioner, Aashish Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under sections 103(1), 61(2), 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and section 27 of the Arms Act. He contended that he was not named in the FIR and was implicated only through a confessional statement recorded in a …
Vikash Kumar Suman was arrested in connection with a case registered under sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act for the alleged recovery of 19 cartridges from the roof of an abandoned house adjacent to his residence. He pleaded that the cartridges were not in his possession, he has no …
Petitioner Pawan Kumar applied for regular bail in a case registered under sections 310(2) and 311 of the BNS. He had been in custody since 20 September 2025 despite having only one prior criminal antecedent and already being on bail in the same case. The petitioner argued that the investigation was …
Petitioners Ram Lagan Kumar and Manish Kumar applied for regular bail in a case registered under sections 25(1B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. They contended that the allegations arose from village rivalry and politics, that no incriminating article was found in their possession, and that the …
The petitioner, Bhavesh Kumar, was charged under Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act in a case registered as Pachmahla P.S. Case No. 25 of 2025. He was not apprehended at the scene; his name was disclosed only by a co‑accused who was caught at the spot. The petitioner argued that the …
Chanda Khatoon was arrested in connection with Haraiya Police Station Case No. 34 of 2024 for alleged offences under sections 108, 238 and 61(2) of the BNS and has been in custody since 3 December 2024. She applied for regular bail, asserting a clean antecedent, completion of the investigation, lack …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Section 309(4) of the BNS. He argued that he was not named in the FIR, was implicated only on information from a police spy, and that no material was recovered from his possession nor was he subjected to a test …
The petitioner, Dayanand Rishideo, applied for regular bail in a murder case (Section 302 IPC) registered on 06.06.2024. He claimed innocence, stating there were no eyewitnesses and that the informant had retracted his earlier allegations before the trial court. The State opposed the bail, but the …
Petitioner Bharat Kumar was arrested on 8 June 2025 for alleged possession of 1.85 kg of ganja, a loaded country-made pistol and a motorcycle, and was charged under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, and Sections 8 and 20(b)(ii)(B) of …
The petitioner, Md. Sharif, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Section 111 of the BNS and multiple sections of the Arms Act for allegedly operating a mini gun factory at his residence. He applied for regular bail, arguing that he is an elderly person, has been in custody since …
Durgesh Pathak was arrested in connection with a murder alleged to have been committed in furtherance of dowry demands, charged under IPC sections 304B, 201 and 34 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. He applied for regular bail, contending that the allegations were implausible because his …
Anand Kumar was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act. He pleaded innocence, asserting that no firearms were found on his person, that the seizure list was fabricated, and that he has no prior criminal record. The State opposed his bail …
The petitioners, Company Yadav and Shital Yadav, were arrested in connection with a land dispute and charged under multiple sections of the B.N.S. and the Prevention of Witch (Dain) Practices Act. They contended that the FIR did not specifically allege their involvement, the injuries to the …
The petitioner, Bhuwal Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under section 310(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He contended that he was not named in the FIR, was falsely implicated due to village politics, and that his confessional statement was obtained under duress. He also …
The petitioner, Rudal Singh, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Section 310(2) of the BNS. He argued that he was not named in the FIR and his alleged involvement stemmed only from a co‑accused’s confessional statement, which he claimed lacked evidentiary value. No material was …
The petitioner, Karan Lal Dev, was arrested in connection with Baheri Police Station Case No. 345/2025, which alleged offences under multiple sections of the BNS, including loot and murder. He applied for regular bail, contending that he had returned looted items and had no involvement in the …
Shamim Alam applied for regular bail in a case registered under sections 61(2) and 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and section 27 of the Arms Act. He contended that he was not named in the FIR and was only a friend of the accused Samsun Johar, whose brother (the informant) had a land dispute with …
The petitioner, Bittu Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 310(2) and 111(2) of the B.N.S. He claimed innocence, alleging that his name was added to the FIR only on the basis of a co‑accused's confessional statement and that he was never subjected to a proper …
Pappu Rai was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case (Raghopur PS Case No. 227 of 2025) alleged under Sections 96 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that Rai, along with co‑accused, abducted the informant's minor daughter, but the victim’s statement recorded …
The petitioner, Sunil Kumar, was arrested on 30 July 2025 in connection with a seizure of approximately 3.844 kg of ganja from the house of co‑accused Sipahi Kumar Rai. He was charged under Sections 20(b)(ii)(B) and 8 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. The petitioner …
Petitioner Pardesi Tanti was arrested in connection with offences under the Arms Act (Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26, 35 and 25(9)) and the Information Technology Act (Section 66(C)) and has been in custody since 17‑08‑2025. He applied for regular bail, contending that co‑accused persons facing similar …
Golu Kumar was arrested and remanded from one police case to another on the basis of a confessional statement, which the petitioner contended had no evidentiary value. The FIR alleged theft of various household items, but the police failed to establish a link between the recovered articles and those …
The petitioner, Md. Saddam, a 20‑year‑old, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 137(2), 87 and 96 of the B.N.S. and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s recorded statement alleged that the principal offence was committed by co‑accused Md. Najir and made no …
The petitioner, Constable Niranjan Kumar, was arrested on charges under Sections 308(2), 316(5), 318(4) and 61(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and Sections 7(a), 7 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly taking bribes on behalf of a senior constable. He applied for …
The petitioner, Chandra Shekhar Kumar Azad, was arrested in a loot case (Bypass P.S. Case No. 392 of 2025) under Section 309(4) of the B.N.S. after Rs. 40,000 was recovered from his house. He argued that the police failed to establish any link between the recovered money and the alleged loot, and …
Petitioner Subodh Yadav, brother‑in‑law of the alleged victim, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 366 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The victim had recorded a statement under Sections 180 and 183 of the BNSS, in which she did not support the prosecution’s allegations. …
Vijay Ray, a co‑driver, was arrested when police seized a truck carrying approximately 540.6 kg of ganja‑like substance; the driver fled. Ray claims he was unaware of the narcotics, believing the cargo to be cashew nuts, and asserts his poverty. The prosecution contends that his presence in the …
Sunil Prasad, accused under IPC sections 363, 366(A), 376(DA) and 34 as well as POCSO Act sections 4 and 6, applied for regular bail after being in custody for more than two years. The petitioner argued that the victim’s deposition, filed as annexure, indicated that no offence was committed by him …
Rani Devi, the registered owner of a Hyundai car, was arrested after the vehicle was seized containing 28.2 litres of codeine‑based cough syrup and three mobile phones in a case under Section 21(b) of the NDPS Act. She contended that she was unaware of the contraband as the car had been taken by …
The petitioner, Nagesh Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered on 22‑08‑2025 under Sections 310(2) and 3(5) of the BNS. He argued that his name does not appear in the FIR and that the only basis for his implication is a confessional statement of co‑accused Nitesh Kumar, which he …
Fekan Yadav was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 20 and 22 of the NDPS Act for alleged recovery of 1.4 kg of ganja and 12 kg of plant parts from his courtyard. He contended that the narcotics were not in his conscious possession and pointed out that several co‑accused had already …
Shyam Kumar was arrested in July 2025 for alleged possession of 4.99 kg of a ganja-like substance, charged under Sections 8, 20(b)(II)(B), 23(b), 25 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. He applied for regular bail, asserting that he has no prior criminal record, has been in …
Satish Rai was arrested in connection with the recovery of allegedly stolen motorcycles and charged under sections 414 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He had earlier obtained anticipatory bail but could not surrender because he was detained in another case, resulting in his continued …
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under sections 137 and 96 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and section 8 of the POCSO Act. He argued that the alleged victim, now an adult, had withdrawn the complaint and affirmed a consensual relationship, and that the …
Suraj Kumar, accused under Sections 25(1‑b/a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, sought regular bail. He has six prior criminal cases but the prosecution’s case rests solely on a confessional statement of co‑accused Manish Kumar, which the State admits lacks evidentiary value. The learned APP acknowledged …
The petitioner, Shankar Prasad, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 331(4) and 305 of the B.N.S. for allegedly receiving stolen jewellery. The main accusation of theft pertained to his son, whose sale of the jewellery was captured on CCTV, while the petitioner was only …
The petitioner, Ajay Kumar, was arrested on 18 October 2025 in connection with a case registered under Sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the NDPS Act for allegedly possessing ten small packets of a smokeless powder weighing about 6 g. He argued that the actual weight of the contraband, after accounting for …
Azmat Taj, who was in custody, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court. After being released from jail, he sought to withdraw the petition. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous. The court considered the submission and the request to …
Petitioners Nepal Kumar and Phul Chand Rishi Dev, accused under Sections 143(5) and 146 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 79 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act for alleged child trafficking, applied for regular bail after being in custody since 22 July 2025. They …
Lalita Devi, a 45‑year‑old woman, was named as an accused in a case registered under sections 103(1), 303(2), 118(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita concerning the death of a person whose body was found hanging in an orchard. The petitioner applied for regular bail, contending that the …
The petitioner, Sanni Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under sections 303(2), 317(3) and 317(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He contended that he was merely a passive participant, was taken to the scene by co‑accused, and that no incriminating material was recovered from him. …
The petitioner, Manchan Kumar, a 20‑year‑old, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Section 309(4) of the B.N.S. He argued that the only evidence against him was the testimony of a co‑accused, while the alleged stolen mobile phone was recovered from another co‑accused and there was no …
Santosh Kumar was arrested on 18 July 2025 and charged under Sections 25(1‑B)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act in Harnaut P.S. Case No. 344/2025. He applied for regular bail, arguing that all material witnesses of the prosecution are police officers who participated in the raid and that there is no …
Raju Paswan was arrested in connection with a case (G.R. No. 3006 of 2023) alleging embezzlement of funds related to the construction of a Nal Jal Tower under a government scheme, and was charged under IPC sections 420, 406, 409 and 34. Paswan contended that he was merely the chairman of the …
The petitioner, an 18‑year‑old student named Gautam Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Section 96 of the B.N.S. and has been in custody since 11 September 2025. The victim’s statement indicated no allegation against the petitioner and described a consensual relationship …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under sections 309(4) and 317(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He argued that there is no incriminating evidence, no looted articles were recovered, and he was not subjected to a test identification parade, while a …
Petitioner Pramod Mehta was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 108 and 3(5) of the BNS for the alleged death of his daughter‑in‑law, who had committed suicide after a marital dispute. The petitioner, aged 57, had been in custody since 15 October 2025 and sought regular …
Radheshyam Prasad was arrested in connection with a case registered on 11 September 2025 for offences under Sections 310(4) and 310(5) of the B.N.S. and Sections 25(1‑B), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. He applied for regular bail, contending that only one live bullet was recovered, that there were …
Petitioners Manoj Kumar Sah and Uday Narayan Sah, Nepalese nationals, were arrested in connection with a case registered under sections 310(4) and 310(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and sections 25(1B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. They applied for regular bail, contending that the recovery of …
Guddu Kumar was arrested in connection with offences under Section 65(1) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. The petitioner argued that the victim did not corroborate the FIR statements before the Judicial Magistrate under Section 183 of the BNSS, that there was a …
Umesh Yadav was arrested in connection with offences under sections 316(2), 316(5), 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. He applied for regular bail, contending that the inspection of his Fair Price Shop was conducted improperly – the authorities …
Sonu Kumar was arrested in connection with a murder case (Magadh University P.S. Case No. 94/2024) under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC. He has no prior criminal record and has been in custody since 14 June 2025. The prosecution’s case rests on the informant’s suspicion, with no …
Sukhdev Manjhi, a 65‑year‑old with no prior criminal record, applied for regular bail in a case (Mufassil P.S. No. 345 of 2025) involving multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He contended that the FIR was a counter‑blast of an earlier case, that the charge‑sheet did not specifically …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar, aged 23, was arrested on 13 October 2025 in connection with a case registered under Section 96 read with Section 3(5) of the BNS. He sought regular bail, contending that the alleged victim, the informant's daughter, had not supported the prosecution and had, in a …
Rahul Kumar Singh was arrested on 30 April 2025 in connection with offences under Section 140(2) read with 61(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The petitioner argued that he was never identified in the test identification parade and that the …
Raushan Kumar, a 20‑year‑old with a clean record, was arrested in connection with a case registered under sections 310(4) and 310(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and sections 25(1B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. He applied for regular bail, contending that the investigation was complete, the only …
The petitioner, Abhishek Chaudhary, sought regular bail in S. Tr. No. 377 of 2025 arising from a FIR registered under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the BNS for alleged assault (marpit) that resulted in the death of a minor. The petitioner argued that the FIR did not specify his individual role in the …
The petitioner, Md. Sonu, was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he and 10-12 others assembled in an orchard armed with firearms intending to commit dacoity, and that a loaded country-made pistol was recovered from his possession. The petitioner contended that the weapon was planted by …
Ajeet Sah was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case (Case No. 519 of 2024) involving the abduction of a baby boy from a hospital. He was charged under Sections 140(3), 143(4) and 3(5) of the BNS. The petitioner argued that co‑accused persons and his wife, who were similarly implicated, had …
Petitioner Rahul Kumar was arrested in Gurua P.S. Case No. 192 of 2025 for an offence under section 308(5) read with section 3(5) of the BNS. He contended that he was not named in the FIR, had already been granted bail in a related case (Gurua P.S. Case No. 232 of 2025), and that the investigation …
Rambhu Yadav was charged under IPC sections 302, 120B read with 34 and Arms Act section 27 for the murder of Md. Gulzar. He applied for regular bail, having been in custody since November 2022, after a prior bail request was denied. The informant opposed bail, noting that a key witness, Badri Yadav, …
Arbind Kumar was charged in PS Case No. 461 of 2022 arising from Belhar, Banka district. He was acquitted of the charges, and his counsel sought permission to withdraw the pending criminal appeal against the State of Bihar and Gulabi Pujar. The court considered whether an appeal could be withdrawn …
The appellant, Satyam Kunwar, appealed against the trial court's order rejecting his bail application in a case under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 2015. He had been in custody since May 2023 and argued that the trial had progressed very slowly, with only …
The petitioner, Yogendra Dubey, an octogenarian with age‑related ailments, was arrested on 10 August 2025 in connection with a case registered under Sections 20(b)(ii)(B), 22 and 25 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985. He applied for regular bail, contending that the …
The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 137(2), 96 and 3(5) of the BNS and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. He has been in custody since 10 September 2025 and claims no prior criminal record. The victim later withdrew her statement and did not …
Petitioner Rahul Kumar was arrested under sections 25(1‑B)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act and has been in custody since 4 September 2025. He applied for regular bail, contending that the investigation was complete, that a prior criminal case was pending where he was already on bail, and that the police’s …
The petitioner, Subham Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act for possession of 16.490 grams of cannabis, an intermediate quantity. He applied for regular bail, contending that the mandatory …
The petitioner, Sawal Ram Drolia, a 71‑year‑old, was arrested in Lakhisarai P.S. Case No. 619 of 2024 for offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 61(2), 336(3) and 338 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, arising from a long‑standing land dispute between his ancestors and those of the informant. …
Dinesh Sharma and Vinesh Sharma were arrested in connection with a case registered under section 303(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, based primarily on the confessional statement of co‑accused Prince Kumar. The petitioners have been in custody since 10 October 2025 and claim that the …
The petitioner, Shinu Sharma, a 21‑year‑old, was arrested in connection with Bypass P.S. Case No. 167 of 2025 for offences under Sections 64, 381(4), 123, 351(2) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He sought regular bail, contending that he has no prior criminal record, the allegations …
Shiv Lal Mahto was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 341, 342, 406, 420, 467, 468, 506 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He applied for regular bail, contending that the FIR was lodged 21 days after the alleged incident, that the matter involved a civil dispute …
Bablu Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous petition (No.86776 of 2025) before the Patna High Court against the Union of India through the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence. During the hearing on 9 January 2026, the petitioner's counsel sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The …
The petitioner, Yogendra Yadav, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 395 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code. He had previously been granted bail by the trial court, which was later cancelled because he was absent at the charge‑framing hearing, having travelled out of state for …
Rabila Khatoon was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 8 and 20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act, based primarily on the testimony of a police chowkidar who claimed she was present at a field where contraband was seized. The petitioner contended that she had no relationship with …
The petitioner, Babu Mubarak, was arrested in connection with a case registered on 21 July 2025 under Sections 137(2), 96 and 87 read with 3(5) of the BNS, alleged to involve the kidnapping of a girl. He claimed he had no prior criminal record and had been in custody since 22 July 2025 while the …
The petitioner, Surendra Rajbanshi, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Section 304(b) read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that he was the husband of the deceased and had no prior criminal record. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with his …
The petitioner, Deepu Mishra, applied for regular bail in a criminal case (Piprakothi PS Case No. 241 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 336(3), 338 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. He contended that the dispute stemmed from a civil matter concerning specific performance of a contract …
Shankar Chaudhary was arrested in connection with Sirdalla Police Station Case No. 336 of 2025 for alleged offences under sections 317(4) and 317(5) of the BNS, relating to the recovery of parts of a motorcycle from a nearby abandoned bathan. He has been in custody since 2 September 2025 despite …
Md. Irshad was arrested in connection with a Forbesganj police case for alleged offences under sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. He petitioned for regular bail, contending that the recovery of the narcotic contraband was falsely shown, that mandatory …
Gopal Sahani (alias Gopal Kumar) was arrested in connection with Banjariya Police Station Case No. 182 of 2024, which alleged offences under several sections of the BNS Act. He filed a petition for regular bail, contending that the FIR was vague, naming 30 accused and 200 unknown persons, and that …
Mitendra Prasad Mandal, a police officer, was arrested in connection with a vigilance case alleging he took a bribe under Section 7(a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (Amendment 2018) and Section 61(2) of the B.N.S. He applied for regular bail, claiming innocence and that the investigation …
Gaurav Kumar was arrested in connection with a loot of Rs.9,10,000 and charged under Section 309(6) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for regular bail, contending that the only evidence against him was a confessional statement of co‑accused Babloo Kumar, which he argued had no …
Ganesh Yadav was arrested on 23 August 2025 for alleged possession of a loaded pistol, a live cartridge and a submersible water motor, offences under Sections 310(4), 310(5), 317(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The petitioner contended that …
Amar Paswan was arrested in connection with a case registered under Section 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He applied for regular bail, contending that the FIR was lodged against unknown persons and that he was made an accused solely on the basis of a co‑accused's statement and a …
Mukesh Kumar was arrested in connection with a case registered under Section 96 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and later Section 8 of the POCSO Act. The petitioner argued that the allegations were false, citing the victim’s statement under Sections 180 and 183 of the BNSS that she had …
The petitioner, Sanjay Das, was arrested in connection with a cyber case (Motihari Cyber P.S. Case No. 60 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic and Substance (BNS) Act, 2023 and Sections 67 and 67A of the Information Technology Act. He contended that the allegations …
The petitioner, Vinod Thakur, was arrested in connection with a dowry death case (Matihani P.S. Case No. 139 of 2025) and charged under Sections 80(2), 238 and 3(5) of the BNS 2023. He alleged that he was merely an e‑rickshaw driver hired by co‑accused to transport the deceased's daughter to a …
Abhilekh Kumar Tiwari was arrested in connection with a Gopalganj Town police case involving offences under sections 341, 323, 324, 327, 447, 387 IPC (read with section 34) and section 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for regular bail after his earlier bail plea was rejected on 28 July 2025. Counsel …
The petitioner, Sanjay Goshwami, was arrested in connection with S.Tr. No. 308 of 2025 for offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 126, 115(2), 109(1), 117(2), 303(2), 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S, 2023. He had been in custody for more than six months and the charges had been formally framed. The …
The petitioner, Rambha Kumari, filed a criminal writ application before the Patna High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ, stating that the matter had become infructuous. The Court considered the request and allowed the withdrawal. …
The Patna High Court heard an appeal by Abhishek Kumar against his conviction for kidnapping, rape and offences under the POCSO Act. The trial court had sentenced him to 20 years for IPC Section 376AB and five years for other offences, all to run concurrently. The appellant argued that the victim’s …
The Patna High Court heard appeals by Selim Sheikh and Mannalal Chaudhary, who had been convicted by a Special Court for offences under Sections 489B, 489C and 120B of the IPC relating to the trafficking of counterfeit Indian currency. Both had pleaded guilty under Section 229 of the CrPC and were …
The Patna High Court heard two appeals filed by Selim S.K. and Mannalal Chaudhary, who had been convicted by a Special Court for offences under Sections 489B, 489C and 120B of the IPC for trafficking counterfeit currency. Both had pleaded guilty under Section 229 of the CrPC and were sentenced to …
The State of Bihar convicted Md. Tahir and his mother Hadizan Khatoon for the murder of Tahir's wife Rina Khatoon and her two daughters by setting the house on fire, invoking Sections 302, 34 and 201, 34 of the IPC. The trial court sentenced Tahir to death and Hadizan to life imprisonment, relying …
The State of Bihar convicted Md. Tahir and his mother Hadizan Khatoon for the murder of Tahir's wife Rina Khatoon and her two daughters by setting the house on fire, invoking Sections 302, 34 and 201, 34 of the IPC. The trial court sentenced Tahir to death and Hadizan to life imprisonment, relying …
The State of Bihar convicted Md. Tahir and his mother Hadizan Khatoon for the murder of Tahir's wife Rina Khatoon and her two daughters by setting the house on fire, invoking Sections 302, 34 and 201, 34 of the IPC. The trial court sentenced Tahir to death and Hadizan to life imprisonment, relying …
The Union of India appealed against a district judge’s order rejecting its application under Section 34(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to set aside an arbitral award on the ground of limitation. The dispute turned on whether the limitation period for a Section 34 application begins …
The Union of India and related railway authorities appealed against a condition imposed by the trial court that they deposit 80% of the arbitration award in Miscellaneous Arbitration Case No. 37 of 2018. The respondents, Afcons Infrastructure Limited, informed the court that the appellants had …
Samriddhi Rice Mill Private Limited appealed to the Patna High Court alleging that the District Judge, Vaishali (Hajipur), failed to pass any order on its application for an ex-parte ad‑interim injunction in Commercial Suit No.1 of 2023, despite notice having been served on the defendants. The …
Petitioner Braj Nandan Singh filed a writ of habeas corpus seeking the production of his two granddaughters, alleging they were missing and traceless. The High Court had earlier directed the Superintendent of Police to investigate. The police report revealed that the girls were living with their …
Surendra Paswan filed a second writ of habeas corpus seeking custody of his minor son, alleging the child is being held by his wife Babita Kumari and Ram Sagar Paswan without authorization. The petitioner had earlier filed a writ alleging his wife's kidnapping, which was dismissed after she claimed …
