Created by Fuzzy Cloud

SONI SHRIVASTAVA

1027 judgments · newest first · showing 201–400

Ramlagan Singh @ Ramlagan Yadav @ Jay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellant, Ramlagan Singh, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.436 of 2024 arising from a 2018 case in Aurangabad. During the hearing on 25-03-2026, the appellant's counsel sought unconditional withdrawal of the appeal. The State and the other respondents did not object to this request. The bench, …

PAWAN CHAOUDHARY @ PAWAN KUMAR CHOUDHARYversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Pawan Chaudhary appealed against the State of Bihar and co-accused challenging a peremptory order. The High Court examined the appeal and noted that the peremptory order had already taken effect. It held that an appeal cannot be filed solely against the State of Bihar in the present circumstances. …

CHINTAMAN PRASAD YADAVversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appeal challenges the acquittal of three accused (Chhotu, Rajesh and Vijay Yadav) in a land‑dispute case where the informant, Chintaman Yadav, was assaulted and injured. The trial court had convicted Lalu Yadav under Sections 324 and 341 IPC for assault with a khanti, but acquitted the other …

LAKKHI DEVIversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellant Lakkhi Devi challenged the acquittal of four accused in a rape case arising from an alleged assault on 18 April 2010. The trial court had found that the prosecution failed to establish the charges under Section 376(D) IPC and acquitted the accused. On appeal, the High Court examined …

DILIP RAM @ DILIP KUMARversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The appellant, Dilip Kumar, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Section 4 of the POCSO Act and Section 376(2)(i) of the IPC for raping a girl allegedly aged 14. The appeal challenged the conviction on the ground that the victim's age was not properly proved, the school transfer …

Ajay Kumar Yadav @ Ajay Yadav @ JhulwaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants were convicted by the Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Samastipur, for gang rape under Section 376D IPC, along with charges under the IT Act and SC/ST Act, and sentenced to 20 years rigorous imprisonment and a fine. On appeal, the Patna High Court examined the evidence, noting a 13‑day delay …

Luv Kumar @ ChhotuversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants were convicted by the Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Samastipur, for gang rape under Section 376D IPC, along with charges under the IT Act and SC/ST Act, and sentenced to 20 years rigorous imprisonment and a fine. On appeal, the Patna High Court examined the evidence, noting a 13‑day delay …

Sonu Singh @ Sonu Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants were convicted by the Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Samastipur, for gang rape under Section 376D IPC, along with charges under the IT Act and SC/ST Act, and sentenced to 20 years rigorous imprisonment and a fine. On appeal, the Patna High Court examined the evidence, noting a 13‑day delay …

Amit Kumar @ Santji @ Amit Kumar KhanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants were convicted by the Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Samastipur, for gang rape under Section 376D IPC, receiving 20 years rigorous imprisonment and a fine. The prosecution's case relied solely on the victim's testimony, which was recorded 13 days after the alleged incident, and lacked …

BHAGAWAN GHI JHA @ BHAGAWAN JI JHAversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellant challenged the acquittal of respondent No.2 (Jagdish Yadav) in a murder case involving the death of Jitendra Jha, alleging that the trial court erred in finding the prosecution evidence insufficient. The prosecution case was based on a private complaint and the testimony of family …

Tuntun SahversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The Patna High Court heard multiple criminal appeals filed by seven accused who had been convicted under Section 376D of the IPC for alleged gang rape, along with charges under the IT Act and the SC/ST Act. The prosecution’s case rested solely on the testimony of the victim‑prosecutrix, who failed …

Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh MehtaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, was charged under Sections 302 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 27 of the Arms Act for alleged murder and conspiracy involving firearms. He applied for bail for the third time after earlier bail pleas were rejected and the trial court …

Chunnu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chunnu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a case (PS Rajepur No. 246 of 2025) alleging his participation in an armed ambush that resulted in injuries to a driver and attempted murder of an informant. The FIR records allege that the petitioner assaulted the driver, …

Gobardhan MandalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Gobardhan Mandal and Lalmuni Devi, aged 76 and 72, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a murder case concerning the death of the informant's daughter, allegedly over a dowry dispute. The FIR alleged their involvement under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., but …

Ganesh BharversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, four members of the Bhar family, were accused of assaulting the brother and son of an informant with a sword and a farsa, allegedly over a dispute concerning a buffalo that entered the informant’s premises. They claimed the FIR was lodged three days after the incident, that the …

Munna SinghversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

Munna Singh, Chairman of Kasiyan PACS, and his brother Rakesh Kumar Singh applied for bail in a case alleging embezzlement of 1,948.75 quintals of paddy worth Rs.45,30,843.75 under sections 316(2), 316(5), 318(4) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The petitioners submitted a no‑dues certificate and a letter …

Fulo DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Fulo Devi, a resident of Sitamarhi, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No.476 of 2025) filed under sections 126(1), 115(2), 124(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.S Act, 2023, alleging she assaulted the informant’s son with a chhanauta and hot oil. The petitioner contended that the …

Pappu DasversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Petitioner Pappu Das had earlier filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case. He later approached the Court seeking to withdraw that application so that he could surrender to the authorities and apply for regular bail. The Court examined the request and granted permission for the …

Afroz Ahmad Khan @ Afroz KhanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Afroz Ahmad Khan, sought anticipatory bail in a case alleging assault with an iron rod under several IPC sections. He claimed false implication to settle a money dispute and asserted that no serious injury was caused and the informant later filed a petition to withdraw the case. The …

Md. HakimversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, a family of four from Saidpur, Vaishali, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Mahua P.S. Case No. 1013 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable and Securities Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act, including assault, molestation, robbery …

Sanjay ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, parents of the main accused Kumarjeet Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 137(2), 96 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in a case where the accused allegedly fled with a minor to solemnise a marriage. The FIR did not specifically …

Md. Jeyauddin @ JiyauddinversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Md. Jeyauddin, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under the Arms Act for alleged involvement in a clandestine firearms manufacturing operation at his residence. The FIR, based on secret information, led police to recover firearms and manufacturing materials, …

BALIRAM SINGH @ BALI SINGHversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellant Baliram Singh alleged that on 10 January 2012 he and his son were attacked by six accused in a land‑dispute, resulting in his son's death. The trial court acquitted the accused, finding the prosecution had failed to prove the crime beyond reasonable doubt. On appeal under Section 372( …

AMIT KUMAR @ CHHOTU @ AMIT KUMAR PANDITversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Amit Kumar, was convicted by the Child Court-cum-1st Additional Sessions Judge in a POCSO case for offences under Section 376 IPC and Section 6 of the POCSO Act, receiving a 13-year imprisonment and a fine. He appealed, arguing that the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB) and the Children’s …

VIKASH KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant was convicted by the Children Court of Lakhisarai for murder, assault and causing hurt under Sections 302, 323 and 341 IPC based largely on the informant’s deposition and an investigating officer’s statement, which the trial court treated as a dying declaration. The appellant claimed …

SHARMA DUBEYversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The victim, Sharma Dubey, appealed the acquittal of Barisrar Dwivedi (respondent No.2) on IPC offences of murder, attempt to murder, assault and other charges, arguing that the trial court erred by dismissing the case without any prosecution evidence. The appeal was filed after the statutory …

RAJDEEP THATHERAversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ALLOWED

The appellant Rajdeep Thathera was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge‑VI‑cum‑Special Judge, POCSO, for kidnapping, rape and offences under the POCSO Act based on the testimony of a 15‑year‑old girl and other police evidence. The appellant appealed, contending that the victim was actually an …

MD. SALAUDDIN @ MD. SALAHUDDINversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellant Md. Salauddin appealed against the acquittal of six co‑accused in a case arising from a land‑dispute‑related assault alleged to have occurred on 2‑Dec‑2008. The prosecution relied on the informant’s written statement and nine witnesses, alleging that the accused assaulted the informant …

Ranjeet ChauhanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ranjeet Chauhan filed an application seeking modification of an earlier order dated 16‑04‑2025 that prescribed a surrender period in connection with Complaint Case No. 16 of 2023. The petitioner requested an extension of the surrender deadline. The court considered the grounds raised in paragraph‑4 …

Ram Chandra ThakurversusThe Union Of India

BAIL GRANTED

Ram Chandra Thakur, a Nepalese national, was arrested in Patna and charged under Section 135(1)(i)(c) of the Customs Act for possession of 58 counterfeit Rs.500 notes. He applied for bail, claiming false implication and no prior criminal record, while the DRI opposed, stating the notes were …

Santosh MandalversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Santosh Mandal, was charged under multiple sections of the BNS, 2023 and Section 6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly abducting and sexually assaulting the informant's minor daughters aged four and five. He applied for bail, arguing that the FIR was filed after an inordinate delay, the …

Pappu Kumar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pappu Kumar Mahto, was charged under Section 65(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a six‑year‑old girl, the victim's daughter. He applied for bail, claiming the accusation stemmed from personal enmity, that he was engaged in agricultural work …

Chandan RishiversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Chandan Rishi, was charged under section 65(1) of the BNS, 2023 and section 4 of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a minor girl. He claimed false implication arising from a family dispute and highlighted that the victim’s father discovered her, not the victim herself, and that the …

Suryabhan NishadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Suryabhan Nishad, was arrested in connection with a rape allegation under sections 65(1) and 123 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and section 4 of the POCSO Act. He contended that he was entrapped by the alleged victim, whose statement recorded under section 183 was …

Pankaj Rai @ Pankaj Ray @ Pankaj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Pankaj Rai and Binay Kumar were charged under Section 137(2) of the B.N.S. for allegedly killing two boys and disposing of their bodies in the Ganga. The FIR was filed four days after the alleged incident and was only presented to the court on 14‑08‑2024, despite being registered on …

Aakash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Aakash Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 65(2), 352, 351(2) of the B.N.S and Section 4 of the POCSO Act, alleging that he raped and assaulted the minor daughter of an informant. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated due …

Nilmani KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, a 19‑year‑old student, was charged under Section 65(1) of the B.N.S. and Section 4 of the POCSO Act for allegedly raping the minor daughter of the informant. He contended that the relationship was consensual, citing the victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S. …

Sujit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sujit Kumar, was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case under Sections 137(2), 140(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., alleged to have abducted the informant’s sister. The petitioner claimed that the victim, a major, had voluntarily left her home, entered into a relationship and later …

Subhash Mandal @ KailuversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Subhash Mandal, was charged with rape of a ten‑year‑old girl under Sections 64(1) and 65(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. He applied for bail, claiming false implication due to family enmity and relying on a medical report that showed no injuries or …

BIRJU RAM @ BIRJU BABAversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant Birju Ram was convicted by a Special POCSO Court for rape of an 11‑year‑old girl under IPC 376(2) and POCSO Sec 6 and sentenced to twenty years rigorous imprisonment. The prosecution’s case rested on the mother’s fardbeyan, the child’s statement recorded under Section 164 CrPC after an …

NITISH KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Nitish Kumar was arrested for allegedly kidnapping a girl, aged between 16 and 18, with the intention of marrying her, under sections 64 and 96 of the Bihar Negotiable Substances (BNS) Act and sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The victim later gave a statement under Section 183 of the BNS Act, …

Anish Kumar Rana @ Anish SinghversusThe Union of India through N.C.B, Patna

BAIL GRANTED

Anish Kumar Rana was arrested in connection with a seizure of 45.3 kg of ganja recovered from the houses of co‑accused Chandan Yadav and Anil Mehta. The petitioner contended that no contraband was found in his possession or in the vehicle he was travelling in, and that he was falsely implicated, …

Mannu Kumar @ Mannu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mannu Kumar Yadav was arrested in connection with a case where he and co‑accused allegedly fired upon an informant. He was not named in the original FIR, but his name was later identified through call data records during investigation. The petitioner, who has been in custody since 11 September 2025 …

Murari Kumar @ Murari Mandal @ Murari Kumar MandalversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Murali Kumar, applied for bail in a case under Sections 20 and 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, where 463 grams of brown sugar was seized from a motorcycle. The prosecution alleged that the seized quantity constituted a commercial amount and was found …

Pawan Kumar Singh @ Pawan Kumar @ Pawan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Pawan Kumar Singh was charged with murder, criminal conspiracy and unlawful use of arms under Sections 302, 120B, 34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for bail, claiming he was falsely implicated and that witnesses did not support the prosecution, emphasizing his status as a …

Abbas AliversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Abbas Ali was arrested in a case under Sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the NDPS Act after a raid recovered 52.6 grams of brown sugar from his vehicle. The petitioner contended that the seizure was false, the quantity was far below commercial levels, and the search was conducted without independent …

Arvind ChoudharyversusThe State Of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Arvind Choudhary was charged with multiple offences under the IPC and the Arms Act for allegedly assaulting an informant and his father and firing five shots at the informant, who escaped uninjured. The petitioner sought regular bail after an anticipatory bail application was rejected, arguing lack …

Vikram RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vikram Rai was arrested in a case alleging murder of an informant’s daughter under Sections 304B, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, purportedly over a dowry dispute. The petitioner contended that the daughter actually died of a heart attack and that the FIR was filed on a mistake of fact, as …

Rohit Kumar @ Ghanshyam BhartiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, was charged under IPC sections 406 and 420 and NI Act section 138 for allegedly receiving Rs. 38 lakh and issuing cheques that bounced. He claimed the money was for a land sale and that an agreement showed Rs. 33 lakh would be returned, with the remaining Rs. 5 lakh also …

SAJAN KUMARversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

REJECTED

The petitioner, Sajan Kumar, a 20‑year‑old student, was arrested in connection with the murder of the informant’s brother and charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He applied for bail, arguing that the case rests solely on a police‑recorded confession, which is …

Mundeshwari Devi @ Bundeshwari DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Mundeshwari Devi and Virendra Paswan, senior citizens and the mother‑in‑law and father‑in‑law of a deceased woman, were charged under Sections 304(b), 120(b) and 201 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly killing the daughter of an informant over a dowry dispute. The prosecution …

Chhotu Kumar Yadav @ Chhotu Kumar @ Dharmendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chhotu Kumar Yadav, was charged under Sections 341, 342, 323, 307, 379, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting an informant and his family with a lathi and iron rod, causing grievous injury. After his anticipatory bail was denied, he surrendered and sought …

Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, a 22‑year‑old student, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 118(1), 109 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., alleging assault on an informant. The FIR specifically attributes the knife‑attack to co‑accused Pawan Kumar, who had already been granted bail on …

FAKIRA RAYversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Fakira Ray, filed an application in the Patna High Court seeking permission to withdraw the pending criminal miscellaneous proceeding. Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Mukesh Kumar, requested that the court allow the withdrawal, stating the application had become infructuous. The …

Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, a 22‑year‑old with no prior criminal record, was arrested in connection with a cyber‑fraud case involving alleged recovery of a smartphone with a fake SIM card. He was charged under multiple sections of the B.N.S. and Section 66B of the Information Technology Act. While …

Md Vasim @ Vasim AhamedversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md Vasim, was arrested in connection with a case alleging kidnapping of a woman for the purpose of marriage. The victim later gave a statement under Section 183 of the BNSS, asserting that she left home voluntarily and married the petitioner. The petitioner, who has no prior criminal …

Ashraf Ali @ Asraf AliversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Ashraf Ali and Nek Mohammad, were arrested along with three minor girls and two minor boys in a case registered under Section 143 of the B.N.S., Section 79 of the Juvenile Justice Act and Section 14(A) of the Child Labour and Prohibition and Regulation Act, alleged to involve human …

Awinash Kumar @ Avinash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Avinash Kumar, sought bail in a criminal case registered under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and the Arms Act, alleging that he was not named in the FIR but was later implicated through witness statements that he, as a clerk, allegedly manipulated and …

Mahesh MandalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mahesh Mandal was arrested in connection with the seizure of 1,330.2 litres of foreign liquor recovered from a Bolero pick‑up van. He is charged under Sections 336(3), 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The …

Lakhan Kumar @ LaluversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Lakhan Kumar petitioned for bail in a criminal case (Cr. Misc. No.5341 of 2026) involving multiple offences under the B.N.S., including assault, robbery and causing grievous injury with a gas cylinder. The prosecution alleged that Kumar and co‑accused assaulted an informant, stole Rs.26,000 and …

Angaj Choupal @ Angaj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Angaj Choupal was arrested in connection with a FIR alleging that he forcibly entered a neighbour's house at night, attempted to disrobe the minor daughter of the informant, and assaulted her, invoking sections of the BNS, 2023 and the POCSO Act. The petitioner contended that the allegations were …

Raja @ Subhash Kumar Choudhary @ Subash Kumar ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The High Court heard bail applications of two accused, Raja Subhash Kumar Choudhary and Omkar Kumar Rajak, who were charged under Sections 25(1‑B)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act for allegedly snatching a mobile phone, cash and a Toto vehicle at point of weapons. The FIR originally named unknown …

Md. RafiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Rafi, sought confirmation of a provisional bail that had been granted on 11‑08‑2025 but could not be secured because the required bail bond of Rs.5,00,000 was not paid at that time. The petitioner later paid the full amount of Rs.15,00,000 into the account of the opposite party …

Siddhu Chauhan @ Sudhir ChauhanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Siddhu Chauhan, applied for bail in a criminal case registered under Sections 103(1), 61 and 238 of the B.N.S., alleging that he helped dispose of a dead body near a riverbank. The prosecution alleged that he aided co‑accused persons in the disappearance of the body, but his name did …

Raju RaiversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Raju Rai, was charged under Sections 109(1), 3(5), 61(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing at the son of an informant, causing a grievous injury to the lower back. The informant also alleged that a co‑accused, Amrendra Rai, assaulted him with the butt …

Md. Mumtaz Khan @ MusamaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Mumtaz Khan, was arrested in connection with a case registered under sections 310(6), 310(5), 310(1), 310(4) and 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, after a pistol and live cartridges were seized from his possession. He contended that the seizure was false, that …

Omkar Kumar Rajak @ Omkar Kumar @ Rajak @ KaliversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The High Court heard bail applications of two accused, Raja Subhash Kumar Choudhary and Omkar Kumar Rajak, who were charged under Sections 25(1‑B)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act for allegedly snatching a mobile phone, cash and a Toto vehicle at point of weapons. The FIR originally named unknown …

Gore Yadav @ Gorelal Yadav @ Gorelal PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, Gore Yadav, Vikash Yadav and Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for alleged assault on an informant and her family. The FIR contains general and omnibus allegations against …

Sonu Kumar Singh @ Amajeet Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar Singh, was implicated in a FIR (Dariyapur PS Case No. 664 of 2022) alleging offences under sections 307, 341, 323, 324, 325, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the IPC, involving armed assault and injuries. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting that a compromise had been …

Lal Bihari Kumar @ Lal Bihari KuarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Lal Bihari Kumar, was arrested on charges under Section 79 of the Juvenile Justice Act and Sections 3 and 14 of the Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 for allegedly trafficking children to Vijayawada for work on an under‑construction over‑bridge. The …

Arun KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Arun Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under Section 309(4) of the B.N.S, 2023, alleging theft of Rs. 135,550 and a mobile phone. The prosecution alleged that the accused snatched the bag at gunpoint, and the petitioner’s name appeared in the co‑accused’s confessional …

Subhash Yadav @ Subhash Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners Subhash Yadav and Gagandeo Rai were arrested in a case registered under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 sections 103(1), 238 and 61(2) for allegedly killing the informant’s granddaughter by hanging over a dowry demand. They contended that the deceased was of unstable mind and had …

Subhas YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Subhas Yadav applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with PS Ashtawan case no.112 of 2025, which alleges assault leading to the death of an informant's father. The petitioner was not named in the original FIR; his name appeared later in a restatement by the informant. Two …

Bhola Bhokta @ Amrendar Bhokta @ Amrendar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bhola Bhokta, was arrested in connection with a 2017 incident where Naxalites attacked an informant and took guards hostage. The FIR named over 40 unknown persons and listed numerous serious offences under the IPC, the Explosive Substances Act and the UAPA, but made no specific …

Madhusudan RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Madhusudan Rai, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 238, 80 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., alleging that he had killed the sister of an informant over a dowry demand. He contended that the allegations were false, that the deceased was his wife in a love marriage, and that …

Guddu Kumar VermaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Guddu Kumar Verma was charged under several sections of the B.N.S. 2023 and the Arms Act, 2025 for allegedly firing on police and possessing a pistol. Two co-accused, apprehended at the scene, identified him, but he was not arrested on the spot; he was later taken into custody on 26‑06‑2025 and a …

Ajay Yadav @ JathaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Ajay Yadav and Balgovind Yadav, were charged with murder, attempt to murder, assault, and offences under the Arms Act in connection with a cattle theft and the killing of a Sub‑Inspector. They argued that they were not named in the FIR, were not subjected to an identification …

Ram Prasad SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The High Court considered bail applications filed by Ram Prasad Sharma and Indal Kumar in NDPS Case No. 09 of 2025, where 123.45 kg of ganja had been seized from a Scorpio vehicle. The petitioners contended they were not owners or drivers of the vehicle, that no independent witness was present …

Ajay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ajay Kumar was arrested in a case registered under Sections 140(3) and 96 of the B.N.S for allegedly kidnapping the minor daughter of an informant. The girl was later recovered and, under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S, stated that she voluntarily went with the petitioner to Ludhiana, stayed with him, …

Abhishek Kumar @ Abhishek YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar Yadav, was arrested in connection with a robbery of a truck and charged under Sections 309(4) and 317(2) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that he and co‑accused Karan Jha stole the truck, with a pistol and live cartridge recovered from Jha. The petitioner …

Jitendra MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Jitendra Mahto, was arrested in connection with the murder of the informant's son and sought bail under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. He argued that there were no eye‑witnesses and that his relationship with the deceased was cordial, emphasizing his young age and clean …

Ravi Shankar Kumar @ Amit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ravi Shankar Kumar, was arrested in connection with an alleged extortion and assault case under several sections of the B.N.S. The prosecution's case is based on hearsay information from villagers, with no test identification parade or incriminating material recovered from the …

Md. TalibversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Talib, was arrested in connection with a violent incident in which the brother of an informant was killed after a knife assault. The FIR contains general and omnibus allegations against the petitioner and co‑accused, while a confessional statement of a co‑accused indicates that …

Chhotu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Chhotu Kumar was arrested on charges of rape under Sections 64 and 62 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. The alleged victim, his cousin sister, claimed the incident was limited to assault with fists and slaps while she was picking mangoes, as recorded under …

Dayanand Yadav @ Dayanand Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dayanand Yadav, a 20‑year‑old, was charged with kidnapping his minor girlfriend, the informant's granddaughter, and with offences under the B.N.S., the POCSO Act and the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act. The FIR was lodged seven days after the alleged incident and the victim’s …

Satrudhan PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Satrudhan Prasad, was charged with facilitating the illegal entry of a Nepali national by providing forged documents, invoking Sections 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3(2)(c) and 14(a)(b) of the Foreigner Act, 1946. He contended that …

Sajan Kumar ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Sajan Kumar Thakur, was arrested for murder under Section 103/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act after the informant’s brother was found dead and allegedly identified the petitioner as his assailant. The petitioner filed a bail application …

Bangtu Mandal @ Bateshwar Mandal @ Banktu MandalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Bangtu Mandal was arrested in connection with a murder case (Nathnagar PS Case No. 328 of 2024) alleged under sections 103(1), 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. The FIR claims that he and another person restrained the deceased while co‑accused Mithun Mandal fired …

Narayan Kumar Mallick @ Narayan MallickversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Narayan Kumar Mallick, director of Manokamna Infra Project Pvt Ltd, was charged with cheating an informant of Rs. 11 lakh for failing to register land in the informant's favour, under IPC sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B). He applied for bail, claiming he was falsely implicated and that …

Arun Ray @ Arun Raya @ Chhatu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Arun Ray, was arrested on charges of kidnapping the minor daughter of an informant under Section 96 of the B.N.S. and Section 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The petitioner claimed the incident stemmed from a consensual love relationship, and the …

Anwar Sah @ Anwar ShahversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Anwar Shah was arrested in Gopalganj after a government pistol with live cartridges and a country‑made pistol were allegedly recovered from his residence. He filed a bail petition, claiming the seizure was false, that the seizure list lacked an independent witness, and that he had already been …

Raja KumarversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioners, Raja Kumar and Mithu Kumar, were charged with offences including kidnapping, gang rape, and other serious crimes under various sections of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act and the POCSO Act. They applied for bail, claiming false implication, the victim’s age of 19, and the lack …

Rubi DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rubi Devi, the mother of the alleged victim, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 65(1), 352(2), 351(3), 61(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 6 of the POCSO Act, alleging she aided the co‑accused in a sexual assault. The petition argued that the FIR was lodged after a long delay, the …

Gaurav Kumar @ Chhotu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Gaurav Kumar, was arrested in connection with a violent assault, robbery and related offences alleged to have occurred at the informant's residence, where five masked assailants allegedly disrobed and filmed the victim. The prosecution’s case rests on the confessional statements of …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Rahul Kumar, husband of a woman who allegedly committed suicide over a dowry dispute, was charged under Sections 80(2), 238(b) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. for her murder. He applied for bail, arguing that he was implicated merely because of his marital relationship to the deceased and that he has a clean …

Chandan MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Chandan Mukhiya, filed a bail application in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 68356 of 2025 arising from PS Case No. 385 of 2024. During the hearing on 24-02-2026, senior counsel for the petitioner sought the court's permission to withdraw the bail application so that a fresh application …

Rahul Kumar Yadav @ Rahul YadavversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar Yadav, was charged with murder under Sections 103 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for bail, arguing that the FIR originally named six unknown persons and that he was implicated only through a confessional statement made in an unrelated …

Golu Kumar @ Ankit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, a 20‑year‑old student, applied for bail in a case registered under sections 109, 118(2), 127 and 191(3) of the BNS, 2023, alleging that he fired at Gopal Kumar causing a simple back injury. The petitioner contended he was not present at the incident, had no criminal antecedents, and …

Badal Dikshit @ Amarjeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Badal Dikshit, was arrested on charges of kidnapping his minor niece under Section 96 of the B.N.S. The prosecution’s case is based on the FIR and the victim’s statement under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S., alleging the kidnapping. The petitioner contended that he was falsely …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, was arrested in connection with the murder of Shubham Kumar, alleged to have arisen from a money dispute. The FIR under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act was based largely on suspicion and information from a local resident, with no eye‑witness …

Monu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Monu Kumar was arrested for allegedly kidnapping the minor daughter of an informant, facing charges under Sections 137(2), 87, 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The petitioner argued that the FIR was lodged after an inordinate delay of about 20 days and that the victim’s …

Dhanesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dhanesh Kumar, was arrested in connection with an assault and theft of a vehicle, camera and mobile phone, alleged under FIR No.122 of 2025 filed under section 309(6) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. The FIR named unknown miscreants, but the looted motorcycle was later …

Chandan Kumar @ Chandan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, was arrested under Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act after a pistol was recovered from his residence. The recovery stemmed from a viral video showing Karu Paswan brandishing a pistol, who later informed police that the weapon was kept at the petitioner's …

Shatrudhan PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Shatrudhan Paswan, a driver, was arrested in connection with the seizure of illicit liquor from a vehicle and charged under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was …

Kamlesh Singh BhoktaversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Kamlesh Singh Bhokta, applied for bail in a case under Sections 18, 20 and 22 of the NDPS Act, alleging that 76.9 kg of poppy straw was recovered from his mud house. He claimed false implication and highlighted that a co-accused had already been granted bail. The State opposed bail, …

Suraj Sharma @ Suraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Suraj Sharma was arrested on charges of kidnapping the minor daughter of an informant, alleged under Sections 137(2), 96, 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act. The petitioner argued that the FIR was lodged ten days after the alleged incident and that the victim had voluntarily …

Annu Kumar @ Amrit RajversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Annu Kumar, the petitioner, applied for bail in a criminal case where he is accused under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing on an informant, causing injuries to the informant's stomach and hand. The petitioner claimed the charges …

Mithu Kumar @ Mithun KumarversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioners, Raja Kumar and Mithu Kumar, were arrested in connection with a case alleging the abduction and gang‑rape of a minor girl, charged under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. They applied for bail, claiming false implication, …

Rupesh PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rupesh Prasad, was arrested for allegedly kidnapping the 17‑year‑old daughter of an informant, facing charges under multiple sections of the B.N.S. and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S. indicated that she had voluntarily …

Lal Babu Prasad @ Lal Babu GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Lal Babu Prasad, was charged with rape of the informant’s minor daughter under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 8 and 9 of the POCSO Act. He applied for bail, claiming he was falsely implicated and has no prior criminal record, though he has been in custody since …

Suresh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Suresh Yadav, was arrested in connection with a complaint alleging fraud and forgery under Sections 420 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code, relating to a fake sale deed of land. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with co‑accused, fraudulently obtained a land deed that …

Vikas kumarversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioners, a group of individuals from Banka district, were charged with cyber fraud offences under Sections 336(3), 340(2), 318(3), 318(4), 111(3), 111(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 66C and 66D of the Information Technology Act. The prosecution alleged that they …

Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioners, a group of individuals from Banka district, were arrested in connection with a cyber fraud alleged to have been perpetrated through the online platform 'WIN ADDA'. During a police raid, mobile phones, ATM cards, SIM cards, a laptop and two motorcycles were seized from their …

Birendra Kumar @ Birendra RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Birendra Kumar, was arrested in connection with an alleged assault on the uncle of an informant, involving multiple co‑accused and unknown persons, and charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner claimed the incident arose from a petty grazing …

RAHUL KUMARversusThe State Of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rahul Kumar, a B.Sc. Agriculture student, was charged with multiple offences including murder (Section 302 IPC) after allegedly assaulting an informant and her husband with a bamboo stick, the husband later dying five days later. The petitioner contended he was not present at the scene and that his …

Hiralal YadavversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Hiralal Yadav, was charged under sections 302, 147, 148, 149, 323 and 504 of the IPC and section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing on an informant's brother, resulting in death. He applied for bail while the trial was at an advanced stage, with all charge‑sheet witnesses …

Ritesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ritesh Kumar, was arrested in connection with a seizure of 72.6 litres of codeine‑containing cough syrup from Asha Nursing Home and charged under section 21C of the NDPS Act. He contended that he had no ownership or control over the nursing home and that the seizure was effected …

Md. RajuversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Md Raju, the husband of the deceased, applied for bail in a case where the informant alleges he killed his daughter over a dowry demand. The FIR charges him under sections 103, 61 and 3(5) of the BNS. The petitioner contends that no dowry was demanded, that the death was a suicide by hanging as per …

Rohit Jha @ Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners Rohit Jha and Hema Devi sought bail in a dowry‑death case where the informant’s daughter was alleged to have been killed for non‑payment of dowry. The senior counsel withdrew the bail application for Rohit Jha, leaving only Hema Devi, who is the mother‑in‑law of the deceased and aged …

Anwarul HaqueversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Anwarul Haque and Shahnawaz Hussain, were arrested in connection with a case where 101.5 grams of brown sugar was seized from the first petitioner. The seizure was alleged to be irregular because no independent witness was listed, violating mandatory provisions of the NDPS Act. Both …

Raj @ Swad @ Toufik AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, a 19‑year‑old student, was arrested in connection with an alleged offence under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the B.N.S., accused of luring the informant’s daughter with a view to marriage and taking her to another place. The prosecution’s case is based largely on suspicion; the victim …

Amit Kumar @ Amit Kumar Singh @ Gunnu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Amit Kumar, was arrested in connection with a cyber‑fraud case (Saran Cyber P.S. Case No.75 of 2025) alleging that he helped open a bank account using the personal details of an informant’s son, which was later used for fraudulent transactions. The petitioner argued that the account …

Raj Kumar PatelversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Raj Kumar Patel was arrested for alleged firing on the leg of an informant's son, charged under IPC sections 307, 34, 120B and Arms Act section 27. He contended that the FIR named an unknown assailant and his only link was ownership of a mobile number used by others, for which he had …

Sanjeet Patel @ Sanjit Patel @ Sanjit Kumar PatelversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sanjeet Patel, was arrested in connection with an alleged offence under Section 317(5) of the B.N.S and Section 8/21(C) of the NDPS Act relating to a commercial quantity of cough syrup. He applied for bail, which had been rejected on 29‑04‑2025, arguing that the investigation had …

SHIV CHAND KUMAR @ SHIVCHAND BIND @ SHIVCHANDRA KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Shiv Chand Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under Section 70(1) of the B.N.S. and Section 6 of the POCSO Act, alleging rape of a minor. The prosecution alleges that the petitioner, along with co‑accused, raped the informant's daughter, who has given a statement supporting …

Tanikan Bind @ Tanik PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Tanikan Bind, applied for bail in a criminal case (PS Case No.109 of 2025) alleging violation of Sections 25(1-AA), 25(1-B)(1), 26(1) and 26(2) of the Arms Act for allegedly operating an illegal gun factory at his residence. The prosecution contended that illegal firearms and related …

Arhul DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Arhul Devi was arrested under several provisions of the Arms Act after a co‑accused, Praveen (Munna Singh), claimed he had hidden a pistol and cartridges in her house. The petitioner argued that the recovery was false, that proper search‑seizure procedures were not followed, and that she had no …

Balram Kumar @ Balram Kumar RajakversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Balram Kumar Rajak was arrested for alleged kidnapping of a minor girl, an offence punishable under Section 87 of the B.N.S. and the POCSO Act. The FIR was lodged five days after the alleged incident, and the victim’s statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the B.N.S. were contradictory, with the …

Niranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Niranjan Kumar, was arrested on allegations that he transported twelve minor girls to a spinning mill in Tamil Nadu by promising them employment, an act alleged to be human trafficking under Section 143(5) of the B.N.S and Section 79 of the Juvenile Justice Act. The petitioner …

Nitesh Yadav @ Nishu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nitesh Yadav, sought bail in a case registered under sections 25(1‑B)a and 35 of the Arms Act after a pistol and cartridge were recovered from his house. He alleged that the recovery was false and that he was implicated due to a land dispute with agnates. He had been in custody since …

Vishal Kumar Jha @ Vishal Jha @ RajaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vishal Kumar Jha applied for bail in a case (Danapur P.S. Case No. 751 of 2024) where he was implicated under sections 103, 111(2), 61(2), 3(5) of the BNS and section 27 of the Arms Act for the alleged shooting of an informant's son. The FIR named unknown miscreants, and the investigation later …

Bittu Kumar JhaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Bittu Kumar Jha was arrested on charges of kidnapping a 17-year‑9‑month‑old girl for marriage, alleged under Sections 96 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 7 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution’s case is based on the FIR, while the victim’s statement under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S. claims she left …

Md. ImranversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Md. Imran, the owner of a motorcycle, was made an accused in a case where 166.101 kg of ganja and the motorcycle were seized. He was not named in the FIR nor arrested at the scene, and he has no prior criminal record. He applied for bail, arguing that his only connection to the contraband is …

Tarkeshwar DasversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Tarkeshwar Das and Dhaneshwar Das, were arrested in connection with an FIR alleging assault on the informant's son and firing of gunshots, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 115(2), 103(1) and 109 of the B.N.S. The FIR was lodged three days after the alleged incident and …

Shailesh Giri @ Shailendra GiriversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Shailesh Giri, was arrested for alleged kidnapping of the informant's sister with the intent to solemnise marriage, and charged under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The FIR was lodged 39 days after the alleged …

Dhaneshwar Das @ Dhaneshwar Kumar @ DasversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Tarkeshwar Das and Dhaneshwar Das, were arrested in connection with an FIR alleging assault on the informant's son and firing of gunshots, filed under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 115(2), 103(1) and 109 of the B.N.S. The FIR was lodged three days after the alleged incident and …

Deepak YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Nitish Kumar and Deepak Yadav, were charged under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. for allegedly assaulting a deceased inmate who later died in custody. The FIR was based on a letter (No. 418) that made no mention of any assault, while a later letter (No. 421) introduced the …

Karan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Karan Yadav, filed an application seeking modification of the bail order dated 09.05.2025 to extend the period for surrender. The court considered the grounds raised in the application and agreed to extend the surrender period by two weeks from the date the order is produced, subject …

Dharam Paras KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dharam Paras Kumar, an 18‑year‑old, was arrested in connection with an offence punishable under Section 87 of the B.N.S. after the FIR, originally lodged against unknown persons, was later linked to him through a conversation with the victim. The FIR was filed seven days after the …

AMIT KUMAR YADAV @ AMIT YADAVversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Amit Kumar Yadav, was charged under IPC sections 328, 304B and 34 for allegedly killing an informant's daughter over a dowry demand. The petition sought bail, arguing a three‑day delay in filing the FIR, lack of criminal antecedents, and that the key informant, examined during trial, …

Md. GulfarajversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Md. Gulfaraj, filed an application in a criminal miscellaneous case and later sought the court’s permission to withdraw it, claiming the application had become infructuous. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Amarendra Nath Verma, requested that the court allow the withdrawal. The court, …

Chandan SahversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Chandan Sah, the petitioner, filed an application before the Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Dharmveer, later sought to withdraw the application, stating it had become infructuous. The court considered the request for withdrawal. …

Mantosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mantosh Kumar was arrested in connection with a POCSO case (sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act) and section 76 of the BNS, alleged to have taken a minor girl to a field and attempted sexual assault. The petitioner sought bail, arguing that the allegations were general, the victim refused medical …

Durgesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Durgesh Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court. No counsel appeared on his behalf on 8 October 2025 or on 15 October 2025. The State of Bihar was represented by Advocate Anant Kumar, and the informant by Advocate Dhananjay Kumar. The Court observed that the …

Rahul Kumar SahniversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Petitioner Rahul Kumar Sahni was arrested in connection with the recovery of 283.10 kg of ganja from a truck, a commercial quantity, under sections 8C, 20B, 25 and 29 of the NDPS Act. He has been in custody since 31‑10‑2022 and his earlier bail applications were rejected twice. The petitioner, who …

RANJAN KUMARversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

BAIL GRANTED

Ranjan Kumar was charged under IPC sections 376, 201 read with 34 and POCSO Act sections 4 and 6 for alleged rape and intimidation of Puja Kumari. The petitioner’s earlier bail plea was denied, but he renewed the application after charge framing, noting that three of eight prosecution witnesses had …

Bachhru Lathour @ Bachharu LathourversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Bachhru Lathour, applied for bail in a murder case (PS Itarhi Case No. 277 of 2024) where he is accused under Sections 103(1), 123 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. for allegedly killing the sister of an informant, who was also his wife of nine years. The petitioner claimed false implication, …

Shubham KumarversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Shubham Kumar, was charged under Section 364(A) of the Indian Penal Code for kidnapping the informant's son. He applied for bail after his earlier bail request was denied on 26-10-2024 and has been in custody since 17-12-2023. The prosecution and the informant opposed bail, noting …

Shivam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Shivam Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under sections 81, 351(2) and 352(3) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, alleging he had a sexual relationship with an 18‑year‑old woman under the pretext of marriage and that she was two months pregnant. The …

Munna KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The Patna High Court considered a bail application filed by Munna Kumar, who was arrested in connection with a POCSO case involving alleged sexual relations with an 18‑year‑old girl under the pretext of marriage and the viral dissemination of objectionable photographs. The FIR listed serious …

AKMAL HUSSAINversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Akmal Hussain, sought bail in a case (Amdabad P.S. Case No.135 of 2025) where he was accused under sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 for the alleged killing of his wife’s daughter over a dowry demand. He contended that the allegations were baseless, …

PANKAJ SHARMA @ PANKAJ THAKURversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION

The petitioner, Pankaj Sharma, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition (No.1444 of 2023) against the State of Bihar arising from a police case. The petitioner failed to appear before the High Court despite repeated notices, and no counsel was appointed for him. The learned Assistant Public …

Anil Kumar Gond @ Anil GondversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Anil Kumar Gond, the husband of a deceased woman, was charged under Sections 304B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly killing his wife over a dowry dispute. He applied for bail, claiming he never demanded dowry, had no criminal record, and that post‑mortem reports did not show poison. The …

Mintu Yadav @ Mantu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Mintu Yadav and Devan Yadav, were arrested in connection with a FIR alleging indiscriminate firing that resulted in a death, charged under sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 103(1), 109 of the B.N.S. and section 27 of the Arms Act. They contended that the FIR contains only vague, omnibus …

Mahendra ChauhanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Mahendra Chauhan, was charged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 329, 74, 351, 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. for allegedly assaulting an informant and her son after a dispute over a petty issue. The petitioner contended that he is a relative of the informant and that the altercation …

Sri Ram BhagatversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ram Bhagat, was charged with abduction and offences under Sections 137(2) and 140(3) of the B.N.S. and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act after allegedly marrying the 17‑year‑old daughter of an informant. The victim’s statement under Section 183 of the B.N.S. indicated she left home …

Azad AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Azad Ansari, an 18‑year‑old, was charged under Sections 64, 123 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly exploiting a 19‑year‑old girl by promising marriage. The petitioner sought bail, arguing that the alleged victim was a major and …

Nikki PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The High Court heard two bail applications arising from the same police case (No. 254 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 111(2)(b), 111(3), 111(4), 111(6) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 20(b)(ii)(c) and 27 of the NDPS Act. The prosecution alleged that 13.4 kg of …

Ravi Shankar Kumar @ Amit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ravi Shankar Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under Section 309(4) of the B.N.S., alleging that his name was implicated only through the confessional statement of co-accused Manish Kumar. The prosecution highlighted the petitioner’s prior criminal record, while the …

Pappu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Pappu Kumar was arrested under Section 111(4) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 25 of the Arms Act after police claimed to have recovered a country‑made pistol and two live cartridges from his possession. The petitioner contended that the recovery was false and …

Pawan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Pawan Kumar applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 103(1), 109, 61(2), 111, 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging conspiracy to murder. The prosecution, based on the FIR, alleged that the accused, including the petitioner, hired criminals who killed the …

Dharmendra Giri @ Sadhu BabaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The High Court heard two bail applications arising from the same police case (No. 254 of 2025) involving alleged narcotics offences under the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and the NDPS Act. The prosecution alleged that 13.4 kg of ganja was seized from the shop of co‑accused Ravindra Giri and a …

Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mukesh Kumar was arrested on charges of cheating an informant by allegedly selling the informant's tractor, invoking multiple sections of the B.N.S. The petitioner contended that he is the registered owner of the tractor, provided ownership documents, and had listed the vehicle for sale on OLX while …

Devan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Mintu Yadav and Devan Yadav, were arrested in connection with a FIR alleging indiscriminate firing that resulted in a death, charged under sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 103(1), 109 of the B.N.S. and section 27 of the Arms Act. They contended that the FIR contains only vague, omnibus …

Md. Masil @ MasilversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Md. Masil, sought bail under section 21C of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act after 6.7 litres of codeine‑containing cough syrup were seized from his residence. He contended that the search and seizure violated sections 41 and 42 of the NDPS Act and that the …

Bhola BhuiyanversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Bhola Bhuiyan, was arrested in September 2024 on charges of raping a seven‑year‑old girl, alleged to be the daughter of an informant, under Section 65(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. He applied for bail, claiming false implication and …

Anwar AliversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Anwar Ali, filed an application in the Patna High Court seeking to withdraw the pending application due to several defects and to file a fresh one. Ms. Mili Kumari, learned advocate, moved on behalf of the petitioner's counsel, Mr. Shashank Shekhar, for permission to withdraw. The …

Guddu Das @ Shiva DasversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Guddu Das (also known as Shiva Das), the husband of a woman who died under suspicious circumstances, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 85, 103 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, alleging that his wife had committed suicide and that he was falsely implicated. The …

Fulkumari DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Fulkumari Devi, mother of a co‑accused, was arrested in a case under IPC Sections 366A and 34 for allegedly abducting a minor girl with intent to marry. The FIR was lodged nine days after the alleged incident, and the victim’s medical report showed no external injuries; her age was assessed at 18‑19 …

Eklakh AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Eklakh Ansari, a 19‑year‑old, was arrested in connection with a rape case (PS Majhauliya, Case No. 437 of 2025) under Sections 65(2), 70(2), 238(a), 61(2)(a) of the Bihar Narcotic and Psychotropic Substances Act and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The petitioner contended that he was merely a …

Punit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Punit Kumar, applied for bail in a criminal case (Criminal Miscellaneous No. 65933 of 2025) registered under Sections 137(2), 140(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. for allegedly abducting the sister of an informant. The victim, a minor of 17/18 years, was examined under Section 183 of the …

Sunil YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sunil Yadav, was charged with kidnapping, abduction, and intent to marry a 17‑year‑old girl, later amended to include rape under Section 376 of the IPC and offences under Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The FIR was lodged 50 days after the alleged incident, and the victim, in a …

Saintu Kumar @ Sintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Saintu Kumar, was arrested for alleged firing on police and possession of an illegal firearm, charged under Sections 132, 109(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act. He contended that the recovery of the weapon was …

Khushboo Devi @ Khushboo KumariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Khushboo Devi, was arrested for allegedly conspiring to murder her husband under Sections 103(1), 61(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. The prosecution’s case lacked any eye‑witness, and the petitioner claimed she learned of her husband’s death only the next day, …

Anil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Anil Kumar and Lallu Gond filed a petition in the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar. After the trial concluded, their counsel, Mr. Manish Rai Sharma, sought the court's permission to withdraw the pending application. The court considered whether a party may be allowed to withdraw an …

Sanjeet Kumar @ Sanjeet Ram @ SanjeetversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sanjeet Kumar, was charged under Section 70(1) of the B.N.S. for alleged rape of a 45‑year‑old informant who is also his sister‑in‑law. The petitioner argued that the FIR was concocted and filed with an unreasonable delay, noting that the alleged incident occurred on 31‑12‑2024 but …

Mahendra YadavversusThe State Of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mahendra Yadav and Rajendra Yadav were charged under IPC sections 448, 307, 506, 34 and Arms Act section 27 for abusing, threatening an informant and firing a licensed rifle. They had previously obtained bail in 2005, which was cancelled in 2008 for misuse, and have been in custody since 20‑08‑2025. …

SUSHIL MUKHIYAversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Sushil Mukhiya, was charged under Sections 80, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly killing the daughter of an informant over a dowry demand. He contended that the death was a suicide by hanging, that he was falsely implicated, and that he has no …

Abhishek Kumar @ Abhishek Gond @ Abhishek GadeversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, filed an application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding concerning a case registered at Dhanaha police station. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the case records had been transferred to the Juvenile Court for age verification of the accused. …

Md. Tuna @ Sadre AlamversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Md. Tuna @ Sadre Alam, was charged under Sections 127(3), 109(1), 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. for allegedly throwing an informant's son from a terrace with intent to kill. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, citing the co-accused's exoneration and the …

Rajiv RavidasversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners Rajiv and Raju Ravidas were accused of murdering the son of an informant and disposing of the body, alleged under Sections 103(1), 238(A) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The prosecution’s case rested on a dispute over remuneration for catching a snake and lacked any eye‑witness; the …

Chhotelal Bind @ Chhetelal BindversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chhotelal Bind, was arrested in connection with an alleged attempt to rape a minor, charged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 76, 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act. The petitioner contended that the allegations were false, noting that neither the FIR nor the …

Lokendra Kumar @ Lochan @ Lokendra Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Lokendra Kumar, was arrested along with co‑accused on a secret tip and a country‑made pistol with two live cartridges was seized from his possession. He contended that the recovery was false as the seizure was not witnessed by any independent person and the list of witnesses …

Ritesh Kumar @ Ritesh Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ritesh Kumar, was charged under several sections of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly opening fire on an informant, though no weapon was recovered and no one was injured. He sought bail, arguing that the case was filed with an oblique motive and that he had no …

Amola DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Amola Devi and Bhola Harijan, mother‑in‑law and father‑in‑law of a deceased woman, were arrested in a case under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. for allegedly killing the informant’s daughter. They contended that the death was a suicide resulting from marital discord and that the …

Rahim ShekhversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Rahim and Sohag Shekh were arrested in connection with the recovery of 45.5 litres of cough syrup containing a high percentage of codeine from their possession. They applied for bail under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, contending that the seizure was false and that …

Arvind KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Arvind Kumar was arrested on charges under Section 79 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act and Sections 3 and 14 of the Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 for allegedly trafficking children to Vijayawada for work on a construction project. The …

Kunal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Kunal Kumar, was arrested on charges of cheating, false promise of marriage, and related offences under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 69, 115(2), 352 and 351(2). The prosecution alleged that he had a year‑long physical relationship with the informant, extracted Rs.1,00,000 on the pretext …