Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

T K THOMMEN

48 judgments delivered by benches including this judge.

SMT. A. N. KAPOORversusSMT. PUSHPA TALWAR

1992 INSC 3431 January 1992Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, who succeeded her father as landlord of a flat let to the appellant on October 1, 1961, sought eviction under clause (e) of section 14(1) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, claiming a bona‑fide personal requirement. The appellant contended that the flat, although let for residential purposes, was also

UNIVERSAL RADIATORS, COIMBATOREversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TAMIL NADU

1993 INSC 12530 March 1993Appeal(s) allowed

Universal Radiators, a manufacturer of automobile radiators, purchased copper ingots from the United States to be rolled in Bombay and used as raw material. While the ingots were at sea, the vessel was seized during hostilities between India and Pakistan and the loss was compensated by the insurer, resulting in a rupee

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS.versusKRISHNARAO SHINDE AND ORS.

1991 INSC 1929 January 1991Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Madhya Pradesh sought to evict Gwalior Dairy Limited (the Company) for failure to pay rent under a lease originally granted for one year and later extended for ten years, and subsequently renewed in 1971. The Company argued it was not a "Government lessee" within the meaning of Section 181 of the Madhya Pr

DHONDIRAM TATOBA KADAMversusRAMCHANDRA BALWANTRAO DUBAL

1993 INSC 24527 July 1993Dismissed

The case concerned a suit filed by Ramchandra Balwantrao Dubal (plaintiff) seeking redemption of a conditional mortgage dated 23 June 1952. The appellant, D.T. Kadam, claimed to be a tenant of the land under a lease dated 15 June 1949 and argued that he was dispossessed before 1 April 1957, thereby qualifying for the b

DR. LAKSHMANSINGH HIMATSINGH VAGHELEversusNARESH KUMAR CHANDRASHANKAR JHA AND ANR.

1990 INSC 21124 July 1990Dismissed

Dr. Lakshmansinh Vaghele, a Laboratory Officer of the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation, was appointed by the State Government as a Public Analyst under the Food Adulteration Act. A complaint was filed against him alleging offences under IPC sections 465, 468 and 201 for acts committed while performing his duties as Publ

SUTLEJ COTTON MILLS LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, WEST BENGAL III, CALCUTTA

1990 INSC 32023 October 1990Dismissed

Sutlej Cotton Mills Ltd., a British India resident company, sold cloth in both British India and native states. For the years 1945-46 to 1947-48 it was taxed under Section 42(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1922 on one‑third of the profit from native‑state sales as deemed accrued in British India, and also under Section 14(2

LALA RAGHURAJ SWARUP (DEAD) BY L.RS.versusHARDWARL LAL AND ORS.

1991 INSC 20221 August 1991Dismissed

The plaintiff, a land proprietor, sued the defendant, a sub-tenant, for ejectment after the original tenants surrendered their interests, causing the sub-tenant's interest to terminate. The defendant argued that his sub‑tenancy survived the tenants' surrender and that the suit should be filed under s.175, which was sta

STATE OF TAMIL NADUversusPK. SHAMSUDEEN

1992 INSC 17921 July 1992Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Tamil Nadu issued a detention order under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 against Sheik Ahamed Hajee on 8 March 1988. The detenu challenged the order in the Calcutta High Court on 5 April 1989, obtaining an interim injunction that was later vacated on 1

MANI RAM AND ANR.versusHARI SINGH AND ORS.

1992 INSC 18021 July 1992Dismissed

In Mani Ram & Anr. v. Hari Singh & Ors., the Supreme Court examined applications filed under Order 22 Rules 3 and 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, read with Section 151, seeking to bring the legal representatives of a deceased appellant on record in a regular second appeal. The Punjab & Haryana High Court had dismisse

MRS. MALATI RAMCHANDRA RAUT AND ORS.versusMAHADEVO VASUDEO JOSHI AND ORS.

1990 INSC 39320 December 1990Appeal(s) allowed

In a partition suit, the plaintiffs (holding two‑thirds) sought sale of undivisible property and the defendants (holding one‑third) applied under Section 3 of the Partition Act, 1893 to purchase the plaintiffs' shares. The dispute centered on the appropriate date for valuing those shares—whether it should be the date t

DARSHAN SINGH AND ANR. ETC. ETC.versusRAM PAL SINGH AND ANR. ETC. ETC.

1990 INSC 36120 November 1990Dismissed

The appellants were contesting alienations of immovable property under the Punjab Custom (Power to Contest) Act, 1920, and their suits were at the appellate stage when the Punjab Custom (Power to Contest) Amendment Act, 1973 came into force on 23 January 1973. The High Court dismissed the appeals, holding that after th

BYRAM PESTONFL GARIWALAversusUNION BANK OF INDIA AND ORS.

1991 INSC 24520 September 1991Dismissed

The appellant, Gariwala, challenged a decree passed on a compromise that was reduced to writing and signed only by his counsel, arguing that the 1976 amendment to Order XXIII Rule 3 of the CPC required the parties themselves to sign. The respondents contended that the expression "parties" includes a recognised agent or

CHANAN LAL AND ORS.versusSMT. AZIZUNISHA

1990 INSC 14820 April 1990Dismissed

The respondent landlady filed an eviction suit under Section 12(1)(f) of the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961, claiming a bona‑fide need for the premises to continue her son’s tailoring business. The trial court upheld the claim, but the appellate court reversed, holding that the son’s business was poor a

BANGALORE MEDICAL TRUSTversusB.S. MUDDAPPA AND ORS.

1991 INSC 16019 July 1991Dismissed

The Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) allotted a plot reserved for a public park in a development scheme to the Bangalore Medical Trust for a private nursing home/hospital, based on State Government orders and a BDA resolution. Residents of the locality challenged the diversion as contrary to the Bangalore Developm

ASHOK KUMAR SHARMA AND ANRversusCHANDER SHEKHER AND ANR.

1992 INSC 35218 December 1992Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents challenged the appointment of the appellants as Junior Engineers, arguing that the appellants were not qualified at the time of filing their applications because their B.E. (Civil) results were declared after the last date for submission. The High Court initially dismissed the challenge, but the Divisio

STATE OF U.P. AND ANR.versusM/S. SYNTHETICS AND CHEMICALS LTD. AND ANR.

1991 INSC 15918 July 1991Appeal(s) allowed

The Uttar Pradesh legislature amended its 1939 Motor Spirit, Diesel Oil and Alcohol Taxation Act to levy a purchase tax on industrial alcohol, which was challenged as unconstitutional because industrial alcohol is regulated by the Central Government under the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951. The respo

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.versusPARAS LAMINATES (P) LTD.

1990 INSC 23517 August 1990Appeal(s) allowed

Paras Laminates imported goods and claimed they fell under tariff item 84.60, but customs classified them under 73.15(2). After losing before the Collector of Customs, the importer appealed to the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal. A two‑member bench doubted the correctness of an earlier three‑membe

EAST INDIA CORPORATION LTDversusSHREE MEENAKSHI MILLS LTD.

1991 INSC 10216 April 1991Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent sued the appellant for possession of a building on the ground of wilful default in paying rent of Rs.900 per month. The appellant denied being a tenant, claiming to be a co‑sharer, but the lower courts held it was a tenant and decreed eviction. While the suit was pending, clause (ii) of section 30 of the

AMIRTIIAM KUDUMBAHversusSARNAM KUDUMBAN

1991 INSC 10516 April 1991Dismissed

The father, as natural guardian, sold immovable property belonging to his minor daughter without court permission and not for legal necessity, violating the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956. The sale was voidable, and after attaining majority the daughter sold the property to the respondent within three years,

K.A. PAUL AND ORS.versusTALUK LAND BOARD, ALATHUR AND ORS.

1992 INSC 34215 December 1992Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether the phrase "son or daughter" in Section 84(1A) of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 includes step‑children. The donor, a step‑mother, executed a gift deed between 1 January 1970 and 5 November 1974 in favour of her husband’s two sons from a previous marriage. The Court held that a ste

ASSOCIATED ENGINEERING CO.versusGOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANR.

1991 INSC 15115 July 1991Dismissed

The dispute concerned awards made by an arbitrator (umpire) under a contract for the construction of the Nagarjunasagar Dam. The arbitrator awarded several claims, some of which were not supported by the contract (escalation for napa‑slabs, extra lead for water, flattening of canal slopes) while others (labour escalati

P.M.C. KUNHIRAMAN NAIRversusC.R. NAGANATHA IYER AND ORS.

1992 INSC 16915 May 1992Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Kunhiraman Nair, claimed possession of land, building and mills after a series of agreements that transferred management and lease rights to him. The respondents, originally lessees of the property, entered into a March 22, 1955 agreement with T.M. Rama Iyer, surrendering their leasehold rights, and T.M.

SMT. P. LEELAVATHAMMAversusCONTROLLER OF ESTATE DUTY, ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD

1991 INSC 4415 February 1991Dismissed

The appellant, SMT. P. Leelavathamma, appealed against the Controller of Estate Duty challenging the computation of the net principal value of the deceased’s estate. She argued that the estate duty payable on the property passing on death constituted a first‑charge encumbrance and therefore should be deductible under S

RESERVE BANK OF INDIAversusS.S. INVESTMENTS AND ORS.

1992 INSC 20514 August 1992Appeal(s) allowed

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) entered into a sale agreement with S.S. Investments that contained an arbitration clause. Two arbitrators – a former judge and a lawyer – were appointed but each issued a separate award, indicating a disagreement. The RBI sought to refer the matter to the appointed Umpire under Clause 4

BHAGIRATHDANversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.

1992 INSC 20614 August 1992Dismissed

The petitioners, two Assistant Mechanical Engineers, sought promotion to Deputy Drilling Engineer on the ground that their higher educational qualifications (degrees) satisfied the requirements of Entry 6 of the Rajasthan Mines and Geological Service Rules, 1960, which prescribed a diploma and five years of drilling or

A.R. RANGAMANNAR NAJDUversusSUB COLLECTOR OF CHIDAMBARAM

1992 INSC 20414 August 1992Appeal(s) allowed

Ten acres of land belonging to the appellant were acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded compensation at Rs.1.01 per square foot, which was enhanced to Rs.2.25 per square foot by a reference court under Section 18 of the Act. The State appealed, and the Madras High

SMT. SHRISHT DHAWANversusSHAW BROTHERS

1991 INSC 34013 December 1991Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Smt. Dhawan, applied to the Delhi Rent Controller under Section 21 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, seeking permission to let her premises for a three‑year residential tenancy, stating she would need the house thereafter. The Rent Controller granted the permission, but the tenant, Shaw Brothers, late

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CALCUTTAversusBRITISH PAINTS INDIA LTD

1990 INSC 38613 December 1990Appeal(s) allowed

British Paints India Ltd. valued its stock‑in‑trade at the cost of raw materials only, excluding overheads, claiming that paints have a short shelf‑life. The Assessing Officer added the overheads to the stock value under section 145 of the Income‑Tax Act, increasing tax for 1963‑64 and allowing a deduction for 1964‑65.

PRAKASH WAREHOUSING CO.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER BOMBAY AND ANR.

1991 INSC 7313 March 1991Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Prakash Warehousing Co., obtained a licence and later an assignment of rights over two corporation godowns and, with the corporation’s knowledge, allowed a second respondent to store goods under an agreement. The corporation later formalised the appellant’s status as principal occupier by a deed dated 17

BARA SINGHversusKASHMIRA SINGH AND ORS.

1990 INSC 27512 September 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the sale of a 3/5 share of ancestral land by three Jat Sikh co‑owners who had migrated from their village. The remaining co‑owners filed a declaratory suit claiming that, under local custom, ancestral land could not be alienated except for necessity or as a bona‑fide act of good management, and that

SURINDER SINGH SIBIAversusVIJA Y KUMAR SOOD

1991 INSC 25910 October 1991Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Surinder Singh Sibia, owned a house in Himachal Pradesh where he occupied the first floor and let the second floor to a judge. The entire house was later requisitioned for the judge's use under the Himachal Pradesh Requisition and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1972, and the appellant did not fil

P. ORR AND SONS (P) LTD.versusASSOCIATED PUBLISHERS (MADRAS) LIMITED

1990 INSC 3439 November 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The landlord sought eviction of the tenant under section 14(1)(b) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, claiming the building needed immediate demolition for reconstruction. The tenant contended the building was structurally sound and that the landlord’s motive was purely economic. The Rent Co

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusJ.S. BRAR

1992 INSC 2709 October 1992Appeal(s) allowed

Major J.S. Brar was charged under Section 69 of the Army Act, 1950 read with Section 379 IPC for theft of army property. After an initial General Court Martial (GCM) found him guilty of one charge and acquitted him of another, the Confirming Authority ordered a revision under Section 160 and Rule 68 of the Army Rules,

POONJABHAI VARMALIDASversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AHMEDABAD

1990 INSC 3119 October 1990Dismissed

The assessee, Poonjabhai Varmalidas, had written off certain debts as bad under Section 10(2)(xi) of the Income Tax Act, 1922 in 1959‑60. His business ceased before the amounts were later recovered in the assessment years 1964‑65, 1965‑66 and 1967‑68, after the 1961 Act had repealed the 1922 Act. The Revenue taxed the

HAMDA AMMALversusAVADIAPPA PATHAR AND 3 OTHERS

1990 INSC 3417 November 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant purchased a suit‑property from the vendors by a sale deed executed on 9 September 1970 and registered it on 26 October 1970. Before the registration, the respondent filed a money suit on 13 September 1970 and obtained attachment before judgment of the property on 17 September 1970, later obtaining a decre

CHETAR SEN JAINversusADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE III, DEHRADUN AND ORS.

1992 INSC 1967 August 1992Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Chetar Sen Jain, had taken a lease of premises in 1958 and continued possession, first as a residence and later as a godown under a fresh oral lease in 1971. In 1982 the landlord alleged a "deemed vacancy" and sought allotment of the premises under Section 12(3) of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of

NATIONAL THERMAL POWER CORPORATIONversusSINGER COMPANY AND ORS.

1992 INSC 1517 May 1992Appeal(s) allowed

The National Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC) entered into a contract with Singer Company for equipment supply, stipulating that Indian law would govern the contract and Delhi courts would have exclusive jurisdiction. A dispute was referred to an ICC arbitral tribunal, which chose London as the seat and rendered an int

SMT. RAM PYARI & ORS.versusJAGDISH LAL

1991 INSC 3225 December 1991Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined a contempt petition filed by Ram Pyari against Jagdish for failing to comply with a prior order that required the respondent to vacate premises, pay any rent arrears, and file an undertaking within three months. The respondent contended that the proper remedy was execution of the decree, not

K.A.ANTHAPPAIversusC. AHAMMED

1992 INSC 1495 May 1992Appeal(s) allowed

The landlord, K.A. Anthappai, sought eviction of his tenant, C. Ahmed, under sections 11(3) and 11(4)(ii) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act, claiming the building was needed bona‑fide for his residence after retirement. The Rent Controller dismissed the petition, finding no bona‑fide need and no damage

RAYMOND SYNTHETICS LTD. AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1992 INSC 354 February 1992Appeal(s) allowed

Raymond Synthetics Ltd. and others issued a prospectus for a public issue of shares and debentures, seeking permission from several stock exchanges to list the securities. The company received massive oversubscription, allotted shares before the statutory 10‑week deadline for obtaining exchange permission, and later fa

SWADESH RANJAN SINHA.versusHARADEB BANERJEE

1991 INSC 2523 October 1991Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, an allottee of a flat allotted by a housing cooperative society under a 99‑year lease from the Metropolitan Development Authority, sub‑let the premises to the respondent. After the respondent failed to vacate following a notice of termination, the appellant sued for eviction under Section 13(1)(ff) of th

D.T.C. WORKERS' UNION & ORS.versusDELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION

1991 INSC 862 April 1991Disposed off

The Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC) Workers' Union filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking a mandamus directing DTC to implement, from 1 January 1986, the Fourth Pay Commission recommendations for its employees, as per Office Orders dated 15 September 1983 and 7 February 1984. The Union argued that employees w

LAXMAN MAROTRAO NAVAKHAREversusKESHAVRAO S/O EKNATHSA TAPAR

1993 INSC 772 March 1993Dismissed

The appellant, a monthly tenant of an automobile garage, was served a notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act and faced an eviction suit. The trial court dismissed the suit on the ground of insufficient notice, but the appellate court reversed the decision and granted possession to the landlord. While

MANGANESE ORE (INDIA) LTD.versusCHAND LAL SAHA AND ORS.

1990 INSC 3361 November 1990Dismissed

Manganese Ore (India) Ltd. paid its mine workers a cash wage, an attendance bonus and supplied grain at concessional rates. The workers claimed that the cash value of the grain concession and the attendance bonus were being deducted from their statutory minimum wages fixed by a government notification, and filed applic

KALAWATIBAIversusSOIRYABAI AND OTHERS

1991 INSC 1231 May 1991Dismissed

Kalawati, a daughter of a Hindu widow, claimed ownership of the entire estate inherited by her mother from her husband, asserting that a 1954 gift deed transferring the property to her was valid and that she had become an absolute owner under section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. Soiryabai, the other daughter,

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search