STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESHversusKHUDIRAM CHAKMA
1993 INSC 16827 April 1993Case Partly allowed
The Chakma refugees, who migrated from East Pakistan to Assam in 1964 and were later shifted to the North‑East Frontier Agency (now Arunachal Pradesh) in 1966, were allotted land under a government resettlement scheme but subsequently occupied land donated by a local Raja inside a protected inner‑line area. The State d…
BHAGWATI PRASAD DIXIT 'GHOREWALA'versusRAJEEV GANDHI
1986 INSC 9525 April 1986Dismissed
Bhagwati Prasad Dixit challenged the election of Rajiv Gandhi to the Lok Sabha on three grounds: alleged loss of Indian citizenship due to marriage and property in Italy, holding an office of profit by receiving a parliamentary salary, and the ineligibility of the Chief Election Commissioner. The High Court dismissed t…
MR. LOUIS DE RAEDT & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1991 INSC 16124 July 1991Dismissed
The petitioners, foreign missionaries who had been residing in India since the pre‑Independence era on periodically renewed residential permits, were ordered to leave the country in July 1987. They contended that, having been ordinarily resident for more than five years immediately before the commencement of the Consti…
AKMAL AHMADversusSTATE OF DELHI
1999 INSC 13124 March 1999Case Partly allowed
The appellant was intercepted at New Delhi Railway Station with a loaded revolver and two passports – one Indian and one Pakistani – and was charged under Section 12 of the Passport Act, 1967 and Section 5 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA). The Supreme Court held that Section 12(1)(a) r…
UNION OF INDIAversusBAHAREH BAKSHI
2024 INSC 64622 August 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, an Iranian citizen married to an Indian national, applied for an Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) card but was denied because the authorities required her estranged husband to be present, either physically or virtually, for a personal interview. She challenged this requirement in the Delhi High Court, wh…
UNION OF INDIAversusPRANAV SRINIVASAN
2024 INSC 79218 October 2024Case Allowed
The case concerned Pranav Srinivasan, born in Singapore in 1999 to parents who had renounced Indian citizenship by acquiring Singapore citizenship in 1998. Pranav applied in 2017 for resumption of Indian citizenship under Section 8(2) of the Citizenship Act, 1955, and the High Court held he was entitled to it, but the …
ASSAM SANMILITA MAHASANGHA & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2014 INSC 87417 December 2014Directions issued
The Supreme Court examined writ petitions filed under Article 32 challenging the constitutional validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955, which was inserted to give effect to the Assam Accord. The petitioners, representing the people of Assam, argued that illegal migration from Bangladesh threatened the sove…
IN RE : SECTION 6A OF THE CITIZENSHIP ACT 1955 versus
2024 INSC 78917 October 2024Reference answered
The case concerns the constitutional validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955, which grants citizenship to certain migrants from Bangladesh to Assam based on cut-off dates (before 1.1.1966 and between 1.1.1966 and 25.3.1971). The provision was enacted to implement the Assam Accord. Petitioners challenged it …
COMMITTEE FOR C.R. OF C.A.P. & ORS.versusSTATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH & ORS.
2015 INSC 67217 September 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The Committee for Citizenship Rights of the Chakmas of Arunachal Pradesh filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking a direction to the Union of India to grant Indian citizenship to Chakma and Hajong refugees who migrated between 1964 and 1969 and have since settled in Arunachal Pradesh. The State of Arunachal Prade…
ABDUL KUDDUSversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
2019 INSC 68417 May 2019Disposed off
The petitioners challenged a perceived conflict between sub‑paragraph (2) of paragraph 3 and paragraph 8 of the Schedule to the Citizenship (Registration of Citizens and Issue of National Identity Cards) Rules, 2003, contending that persons declared illegal migrants or foreigners could still appeal and be included in t…
K. KRISHNA M.A. RALHANYversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2007 INSC 61116 May 2007Disposed off
The appellant, K. Krishna M.A. RAIHANY, applied for Indian citizenship by naturalization under Section 6(1) of the Citizenship Act, 1955. He alleged that no order had been passed on his application, while the Union of India and the State of Maharashtra contended that a communication dated 29 August 2006 from the Under …
ASSAM PUBLIC WORKSversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2019 INSC 89113 August 2019Directions issued
The Supreme Court examined the State Coordinator's report on the National Register of Citizens (NRC) in Assam, specifically paragraphs 7(a), 7(b) and 7(c) which dealt with the exclusion or inclusion of descendants of Declared Voters (DV), Declared Foreigners (DF) and Persons Found to be Tribunals (PFT). The petitioners…
MIZO CHIEF COUNCIL MIZORAM, THR. PRESIDENT SHRI L. CHINZAHversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2026 INSC 23613 March 2026Dismissed
The Mizo Chief Council filed a writ petition under Article 32 on behalf of tribal chieftains alleging that the State had acquired their traditional lands without paying due compensation, violating their fundamental right to property. The petition was filed in 2014, more than six decades after the 1955 notification that…
ASSOCIATION OF OLD SETTLERS OF SIKKIM AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
2023 INSC 2913 January 2023Disposed off
The petitioners, old Indian settlers of Sikkim, challenged the definition of “Sikkimese” in Section 10(26AAA) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and the proviso that excluded a Sikkimese woman who married a non‑Sikkimese after 1 April 2008 from the tax exemption. They argued that the exclusion of settlers whose names were not…
HARISHANKAR JAINversusSONIA GANDHI
2001 INSC 43812 September 2001Dismissed
The appellants Hari Shanker Jain and Hari Krishna Lal challenged the election of Sonia Gandhi to the Lok Sabha, alleging that she was not a citizen of India despite holding a certificate of citizenship under Section 5(1)(c) of the Citizenship Act, 1955. They also questioned the constitutional validity of the Citizenshi…
SARBANANDA SONOWALversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
2005 INSC 28712 July 2005
The Supreme Court examined a public‑interest writ petition challenging the constitutionality of the Illegal Migrants (Determination by Tribunals) Act, 1983 (IMDT Act) and its 1984 Rules, which were applicable only to Assam for detecting and deporting illegal migrants. The Court held that the Act and Rules were ultra‑vi…
MD. RAHIM ALI @ ABDUR RAHIMversusTHE STATE OF ASSAM & ORS.
2024 INSC 51111 July 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Md. Rahim Ali, was declared a foreigner by the Foreigners Tribunal, Nalbari, on the basis that he failed to prove his Indian citizenship under Section 9 of the Foreigners Act, 1946. He challenged the Tribunal's order, arguing that the authorities had no material basis for the allegation of illegal migrat…
NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSIONversusSTATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH AND ANR.
1996 INSC 389 January 1996Case Allowed
The National Human Rights Commission filed a writ petition under Article 32 on behalf of about 65,000 Chakma refugees settled in Arunachal Pradesh, alleging persecution, quit notices and threats of eviction by the All Arunachal Pradesh Students Union. The Chakmas had applied for Indian citizenship under Section 5(1)(a)…
A. RAJAversusD. KUMAR
2025 INSC 6296 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, A. Raja, contested and won the Devikulam Assembly seat, a constituency reserved for Scheduled Castes, by filing a nomination stating he belonged to the Hindu Parayan caste, supported by a caste certificate. The respondent challenged the election, alleging that the appellant's paternal grandparents migrat…
LAL BABU HUSSEIN AND ORS.versusELECTORAL REGISTRATION OFFICER AND ORS.
1995 INSC 986 February 1995Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the Election Commission's directives that empowered district collectors and police to determine a person's citizenship and delete alleged foreign nationals from electoral rolls. Petitioners challenged the procedure, arguing that notices relied solely on police reports, limited the documents t…
BASUDEV DUTTAversusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.
2024 INSC 9405 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed
Basudev Dutta, an Ophthalmic Assistant employed by the West Bengal Government since 1985, was terminated in 2011 after a police verification report, filed 25 years later, labeled him ‘unsuitable’ for the post. He challenged the termination, asserting Indian citizenship based on his father’s migration certificate and ar…
SQN. LDR. (RETD.) NAVTEJ SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2018 INSC 11575 December 2018Appeal(s) allowed
Squadron Leader Navtej Singh, an Indian Air Force officer, applied for permission to marry a Canadian immigrant in 2008 but contracted the marriage without waiting for the required approval. He was later invalidated from service on medical grounds in November 2009. After his retirement, he sought to have his wife and d…
RUPAJAN BEGUMversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2017 INSC 11795 December 2017Case Partly allowed
The Supreme Court examined the validity of certificates issued by Gram Panchayat (GP) Secretaries, countersigned by revenue officials, for married women who migrated to other villages. These certificates were listed as supporting documents for claims of inclusion in the National Register of Citizens (NRC) under Section…
KAMALAKHYA DEY PURKAYASTHA AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS .
2017 INSC 11845 December 2017Disposed off
The petitioners filed writ petitions under Article 32 seeking a judicial definition of the phrase “originally inhabitants of the State of Assam” in Clause 3(3) of the Schedule to the Citizenship (Registration of Citizens and Issues of National Identity Cards) Rules, 2003, and directions on how such persons should be id…
SARBANANDA SONOWALversusUNION OF INDIA
2006 INSC 9545 December 2006Case Allowed
The petitioners challenged the Foreigners (Tribunal) Amendment Order, 2006 which made the 1964 Foreigners (Tribunals) Order inapplicable to Assam, arguing that it contravened Articles 14, 21 and 355 of the Constitution and sought to nullify the Supreme Court's earlier judgment in Sarbananda Sonowal v. Union of India (2…
ANUSHKA RENGUNTHWAR & ORSversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2023 INSC 993 February 2023Case Partly allowed
The petitioners, who are Overseas Citizens of India (OCI) card‑holders, had been allowed since 2005 to appear for the All India Pre‑Medical Test (NEET) and compete for medical seats on parity with Non‑Resident Indians (NRIs) and Indian citizens. In March 2021 the Union of India issued a notification under Section 7B(1)…
BHANWAROO KHAN AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2002 INSC 1762 April 2002Dismissed
Bhanwaroo Khan and his wife, who migrated to Pakistan after Partition and obtained Pakistani passports, entered India in 1955 on a visa, later failed to return and lived underground. In 1984 they applied for Indian citizenship, but the Government of India, invoking Section 9(2) of the Citizenship Act, 1955 and Rule 3 o…
PALLAVIversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2023 INSC 7821 September 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The petitioner, an OCI card‑holder and U.S. national, applied for a postgraduate medical seat through the NEET (PG) exam and was initially treated as a foreign national, securing a high percentile and being allotted a pediatrics seat in AIIMS during the mock round. Shortly before the first counselling round, the author…