Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
17749 judgments · newest first · showing 5001–5200
The petitioner, Sikandar Kumar, sought regular bail in a case involving offences under IPC sections 323, 34, 341, 376‑D‑A, 504 and 506 and Section 4 of the POCSO Act, relating to the alleged rape of a minor on 10‑04‑2020. The petitioner was not named in the FIR; his name appeared only in the …
The petitioners, Nagina Mahto and Devpati Devi, relatives of co‑accused Punit Kumar, were arrested in connection with a kidnapping and sexual exploitation case (IPC §§366A, 34 and POCSO Act §8) involving a 16‑year‑old girl. They contended that they were falsely implicated because the victim’s …
The petitioners, Shyam Nath Rai and Sanjeet Kumar Rai, were charged under multiple sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 for assaulting an informant and others during a land‑related dispute. They have prior criminal antecedents—nine and six cases respectively—and have been in custody …
Petitioner Rana Rakesh Singh sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a 2015 case (Giriyak PS No. 269) involving offences under several IPC sections and Section 47A of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was not named in the FIR, the seized vehicle did not belong to him, and no direct …
The petitioner, Rina Kumari, sought bail in a case (Kowakol P.S. Case No. 480 of 2025) involving multiple offences under the B.N.S., where she was alleged to have participated in a violent assault that resulted in the informant's death. She claimed innocence, asserted no specific allegation against …
The petitioner, Raman Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 363, 366A, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, abducted the informant's daughter and later forced her to marry him, as …
The appellant, Goga Rai, filed a criminal appeal which was pending before the Patna High Court. During the pendency, the police informed the court that the appellant had died. The court examined the applicable provision, Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section …
The petitioner, Md Maqbool, filed an anticipatory bail petition after being implicated in a case (Mahila P.S. Case No.46 of 2025) alleging sexual assault on his minor daughter under IPC sections 354, 354A and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. He claimed innocence, alleging that the FIR was lodged by his …
The petitioners, three brothers from Gaya district, were implicated in a land‑dispute case where the informant alleged they assaulted her and her son with firearms and an iron rod, causing injuries and alleged outraging of modesty. The petitioners claimed innocence, stating no injuries consistent …
The petitioner, Butta Yadav, was implicated in a case involving assault on an informant and her husband, with charges under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. He claimed innocence, alleging the case stemmed from a prior land dispute, and asserted a clean criminal record. The …
The petitioners, four residents of Dhanushi village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with Benipatti P.S. Case No. 75 of 2024, which involved multiple IPC offences. They asserted innocence, clean antecedents, and the absence of any incriminating material in their possession, …
The petitioners, seven residents of Sohaipur village in Gaya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Muffasil P.S. Case No. 1115 of 2025) involving alleged communal violence during the 2025 Bihar Legislative Assembly elections. The prosecution alleged that a WhatsApp message prompted …
The appellant, Kashi Chamar, filed a criminal appeal which was pending before the Patna High Court. During the pendency, the appellant died, as confirmed by a police superintendent's letter, an SHO report, and a death certificate. The court examined whether the appeal could proceed in the absence of …
The appellant, Ram Naresh Singh, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.45 of 2004 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as confirmed by a police letter, a police report, and a death certificate. The Court examined Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, …
Manohar Pandey filed a criminal appeal before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant was found to be deceased, as reported by the Superintendent of Police and the Sub‑Inspector. The Court examined the applicable provision, Section 394 of the Code of Criminal …
The petitioner, Raju Kumar, sought bail in connection with a Mahila Police Station case involving offences under Sections 65(I), 115(2), 126(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The informant's counsel informed the court that a process under Section 82 of …
The petitioners, three individuals, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that liquor was recovered from a rented room not belonging to them and that they had no conscious possession. They contended that the investigation …
The petitioner applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor. The petitioner argued that no liquor was recovered from his possession, the alleged incident occurred on premises …
The appellant, Ramdeo Yadav, filed Criminal Appeal (DB) No.381 of 2005 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as confirmed by a letter from the Superintendent of Police and a death certificate. The court examined the effect of the appellant’s death on the …
The petitioner, Dhiraj Prakash, was charged under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 34 for allegedly hiring a scholar to sit in the NEET examination, a fraud detected during digital verification. He filed an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC, asserting his innocence …
The appellants, Kaushalia Devi and Dasai Ram, filed a criminal appeal against the State of Bihar. During the pendency of the appeal, the police investigation revealed that both appellants had died, and death certificates were produced. Under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 …
The appellant Sunil Singh filed a criminal appeal, but during the pendency of the appeal the appellant died, as evidenced by a death certificate annexed to the police report. The High Court examined the report and noted that no near relative had applied for leave to continue the appeal. Relying on …
The appellant, Nathuni Chaudhary, filed a criminal appeal which was pending before the Patna High Court. During the pendency, the appellant died, as evidenced by a police letter, a police report, and a death certificate. The court examined Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 …
The petitioner, Bishnu Prakash Mahto, was implicated in a case where 16.38 litres of Nepali foreign liquor was recovered from a motorcycle he owned, which had been lent to a co‑accused. He alleged that he had no knowledge of the liquor or any involvement in its trade and possessed a clean criminal …
The appellants, Ramjee Mahto and Nunnulal Mahto, filed a criminal appeal before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, both appellants died, as confirmed by a death certificate and police reports. No near relative filed an application for leave to continue the appeal. Pursuant to …
The appellant Krishna Prasad filed a criminal appeal against the State of Bihar. During the pendency of the appeal, it was discovered that the appellant had died, as evidenced by a death certificate dated 30-09-2020. The Superintendent of Police and the SHO submitted reports confirming the death. No …
The appellant, Jagdeo Mahto, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.884 of 2008 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the police confirmed that the appellant had died, and a death certificate was attached to the report. The court examined the applicable provision, Section 394 of …
The appellant, Munna Pandey, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.860 of 2010 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as evidenced by a death certificate annexed to a police report. The court examined the report and considered the provisions of Section 394 of …
The petitioner, Vijay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Benipatti P.S. Case No. 102 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 272, 273 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed he had sold the tempo in 2015 and was …
The appellant, Basudeo Sahni, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.96 of 2010 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as confirmed by a police report and death certificate. No near relative filed an application for leave to continue the appeal. The Court, …
The petitioner, Pankaj Upadhyay, was charged under Sections 364A and 411 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1‑Ba), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act for kidnapping a victim and demanding a Rs. 5 lakh ransom. He sought regular bail for the second time after an earlier bail application was rejected. The …
The petitioner, Raushan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after his name was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged illegal liquor trade. The prosecution’s case was based on information from two arrested co‑accused who named the petitioner, but no …
The appellant Bipin Kumar @ Kailu Kunwar filed a criminal appeal against the State of Bihar. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as confirmed by a death certificate and police reports. The court examined the Superintendent of Police's letter and the relevant statutory provisions, …
The petitioner, Raju Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS 72/2024) alleging offences under Section 310(2) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleges that five unidentified persons on two motorcycles looted Rs 4,00,000 from an informant at gunpoint. The petitioner’s name was …
The appellant, Suresh Mahto, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.167 of 2007 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant was found to be deceased, as evidenced by a police letter and a death certificate. The Court examined Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, …
The petitioner, Md Irshad, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (K. Hat P.S. Case No. 361 of 2025) under Section 21(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. The police had seized 9.900 litres of Codeine Phosphate and Triprolidine Hydrochloride syrup from a …
The appellants, Sajiwan Sao and Bhagwan Sao, filed a criminal appeal against the State of Bihar. During the pendency of the appeal, a police report confirmed that both appellants had died. The court examined Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section 435 of the …
The petitioner, Sunil Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 38.250 litres of foreign liquor recovered from co‑accused Rajesh Kumar and Ravi Kumar at Darbhanga Junction. He contended that the …
Guddu Nut applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 105 litres of liquor. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, that the liquor was recovered …
Lalita Devi, the mother of the driver of an E‑rickshaw, was implicated in a case (Lauriaya PS No. 80 of 2026) for alleged possession of an illegal country‑made pistol recovered from the vehicle. The pistol was seized from the E‑rickshaw, which is owned by the petitioner, and she was charged under …
The petitioner, Dwarika Prasad Yadav, the owner of a motorcycle, was implicated in an excise case for the recovery of two litres of country‑made liquor from his vehicle, alleged to violate Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. He applied for pre‑arrest bail, …
The petitioner, Vindhyachal Singh, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a FIR alleging assault, use of iron rod, and intent to kill the informant, under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed innocence, asserting that the dispute was a land matter and that the injuries were …
Kanhaiya Bhagat was implicated in a FIR alleging that he, along with co‑accused, assaulted an informant and his family with the intention to kill, invoking several sections of the Bihar Penal Code. The petitioner applied for pre‑arrest bail, claiming innocence, false implication, a five‑day delay in …
The petitioners, five members of the Paswan family, were named in FIR No. 90 of 2026 for alleged assault on an informant and his wife using a lathi and iron rod, invoking Sections 126(2), 115(2), 351(2), 110, 352 and 3(5) of the Bihar Non‑Compulsory Statutes, 2023. They contended that they were …
The petitioners Durga Chaudhary and Vikash Chaudhary were implicated in a case alleging recovery of 50 litres of country‑made liquor from the Falgu river, contravening Sections 30(a), 30(c) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. Vikash's bail request was withdrawn after his arrest. Durga …
The petitioner, Pavan Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 265 litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard. He has three prior cases under the Excise Act and argues that the liquor was not recovered …
The petitioner, Rupesh Kumar Roy, was charged with kidnapping under IPC s.363, later amended to include IPC s.366A and Section 4 of the POCSO Act, for allegedly abducting the minor daughter of an informant. The victim was recovered and, under Sections 161 and 164 of the CrPC, gave a statement that …
The petitioners, Sanjay Chaudhary and Kundan Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in Simari Police Station Case No. 38 of 2026, which alleged offences under multiple sections of the Bihar Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners assaulted an informant who claimed a …
The petitioner, Govind Kumar, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 12 litres of country‑made liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was falsely implicated due to personal enmity and that the …
The petitioners, Juhi Praveen, Md. Shaukat and Muskan Praveen, were implicated in a dowry harassment case (PS Case No. 361 of 2025) alleging demand of Rs. two lakh, assault and eviction of the informant, who is their daughter‑in‑law. The petitioners contended that they never demanded dowry, that the …
The petitioner, Manish Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a 2019 case alleging he fired at an informant, causing a wound to the right ear. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner shot the informant, supported by a medical report showing a lacerated wound, tattooing, and …
The petitioner, Bholu Kumar Ram, was arrested in connection with a case involving 69.84 litres of country-made liquor recovered from a motorcycle, alleged to violate Sections 30(a), 32(i)&(iii), and 41(i)&(ii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022. He applied for pre‑arrest bail, …
The petitioner, Bhola Ram, was implicated in a case (Simri P.S. Case No. 70/2026) for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, after police recovered liquor concealed in a family property during a raid. The petitioner claimed innocence, …
Vishal Anand, a former branch manager of North Bihar Gramin Bank, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a fraud case involving alleged defalcation of Rs.66,69,010.80 from 31 KCC accounts, with charges under IPC sections 420, 409, 120(B) and 34. The petitioner argued he was falsely …
Manoj Sah sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Bhaptiyahi No.230 of 2025) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 116.535 litres of liquor from a bari behind his house. He contended that the liquor was not in his …
Santosh Nut was accused under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 105 litres of liquor from a public place. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting a clean criminal record, no arrest, and no possession of the liquor, and claiming that the allegation stemmed from an inimical …
The petitioner, Sanni Singh, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 203.97 litres of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the alleged liquor was …
Bharat Pasi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. after a case was registered against him for alleged offences under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act involving the recovery of liquor from various locations. The petitioner asserted that he had no prior criminal record, that …
Ganesh Baitha was accused in a 2024 Rohtas police case of kidnapping the minor daughter of the informant under IPC sections 366(A) and 363. The victim, Ranjani Kumari, gave a statement under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. claiming she voluntarily left home to marry Baitha, was married at a temple, and …
Kajal Devi, the owner of a motorcycle from which 450 litres of liquor were seized, was implicated in offences under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. She argued that she had no prior criminal …
The petitioner, Sanoj Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 23.6 litres of liquor recovered from a cowshed on his premises. He contended that the liquor was hidden by hostile villagers and that he was …
The petitioner, Rajbanshi Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor from his auto. He argued that he was not present at the spot of …
Mukesh Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 7.5 litres of liquor recovered from his scooter. He was not arrested at the spot, and the prosecution’s case rested on his ownership of the vehicle, which his younger brother …
The petitioner, Rakesh Tiwari, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (PS Case No. 413 of 2023) alleging offences of forgery, cheating and conspiracy under sections 467, 468, 420, 471, 472, 120B read with 34 of the IPC. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner conspired to …
The petitioner, Radhika Devi, was implicated in a case (Mairwa PS Case No. 34 of 2026) alleging assault and theft, with the prosecution alleging that she participated in an assault on the informant and her family. The petitioner contended that she was innocent, that no specific overt act was alleged …
The petitioner, Hari Shankar Choudhary, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly possessing 5 litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the …
The petitioner, Gautam Yadav, sought pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 17 litres of country‑made liquor seized during a police raid. The FIR alleged that the liquor was linked to the petitioner based solely on …
The petitioner, Kishore Kumar Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 486 litres of liquor from a Hyundai car. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and …
The petitioner, Md Firoz @ Gulab Hussain, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 13.2 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the …
The petitioner, Sonu, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(A) of the Excise Act, alleging that 32.22 litres of liquor were recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in …
The petitioner, Naresh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging that 5.4 litres of liquor were recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, had a …
Debu Mandal appealed a criminal conviction, but during the pendency of the appeal he died, as confirmed by a death certificate. The court examined a police letter and report indicating his death. Under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section 435 of the Bharatiya …
Sarita Devi was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 30 litres of illicit country-made liquor recovered from an open area in front of her house. She argued that the liquor was not in her conscious possession and that the recovery …
Shyam Sahani, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that liquor was recovered from a river bank and not from his possession. He has three prior criminal cases, one relating to excise, and claims the accusation …
Raj Patel was arrested in Bhitaha police station for possession of 2.5 kg of ganja, with a total seizure of 8.88 kg, and charged under Sections 8, 20(b)(ii)(B) and 27‑A of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. The petitioner applied for bail, arguing that the quantity involved …
The petitioner, Dharmendra Keshari, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 23.40 litres of liquor from his scooter. He argued that he was not present at the spot of seizure, that the liquor was not in his conscious …
The petitioner, Ajit Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 17 litres of liquor from a location not under his possession. He argued that he was not present at the spot, the liquor …
Vishwakarma Mahto applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging offences under Sections 336(3), 336(4), 340(2) and 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, claiming he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the seized liquor, and was not the …
Shyam Babu Roy was implicated in Mahnar P.S. Case No.223 of 2024 for alleged conspiracy to fraudulently prepare and execute a forged sale deed, charged under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 472 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He applied for bail, asserting innocence, lack of specific allegations …
Anand Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging that liquor was recovered from a site adjacent to his brick‑kiln and that he was not arrested or found in possession of the …
The appellant, Anil Pandey, died during the pendency of his criminal appeal. The Senior Superintendent of Police informed the Court of his death. The Court examined Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023), …
The petitioner, Vikram Kumar, sought bail after being implicated in a theft case involving a stolen motorcycle, with the prosecution alleging offences under Sections 414, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 34 of the IPC. The police report stated that three boys were seen attempting to flee on the motorcycle, …
The petitioners, members of the same extended family, sought quashing of two parallel criminal cases arising from a family dispute over property and partition. The first case alleged assault and related offences under Sections 341, 323, 324 and 504 IPC, while the second alleged assault, theft and …
The appellant, Rajendra Gor, filed a criminal appeal which was pending when he died, as evidenced by a police letter and a death certificate. The question before the Patna High Court was whether the appeal could continue in the absence of any application by a near relative for leave to proceed. The …
The appellant, Rajeev Yadav, died during the pendency of his criminal appeal, and a death certificate was produced. No near relative filed an application for leave to continue the appeal. The court examined the relevant provisions, namely Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 …
The appellant Prakash Mandal filed a criminal appeal, but during the pendency of the appeal he died, as confirmed by a death certificate and police reports. The court examined whether the appeal could continue in the absence of any application by a near relative for leave to proceed. Under Section …
The appellant Krishna Prasad filed a criminal appeal against the State of Bihar. During the pendency of the appeal, it was discovered that the appellant had died, as evidenced by a death certificate dated 30-09-2020. The Superintendent of Police and the SHO submitted reports confirming the death. No …
The appellant, Shivmurat Bind, filed a criminal appeal which was pending before the Patna High Court. During the pendency, the police informed the court that the appellant had died. The court examined whether the appeal could continue in the absence of the appellant and without any application by a …
The appellant, Nand Gopal Rai, filed a criminal appeal against the State of Bihar. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as confirmed by a death certificate issued by the village Sarpanch. No near relative filed an application for leave to continue the appeal. The Court, applying …
The appellant, Suresh Mandal, died during the pendency of his criminal appeal, and a death certificate was produced. The court examined the police report confirming the death. Under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha …
The appellant, Bhola Khan, filed a criminal appeal against the State of Bihar. During the pendency of the appeal, the Superintendent of Police reported that the appellant had died, attaching a death certificate. The court examined this report and considered Section 394 of the Code of Criminal …
The appellant, Kalpana Kumari, filed a criminal appeal but was found to be deceased, as evidenced by a death certificate attached to a police report. No near relative filed an application for leave to continue the appeal. Under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to …
The appellant, Suddi Singh, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.1238 of 2008 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as confirmed by a death certificate annexed to a police report. No near relative filed an application for leave to continue the appeal. Under …
The appellant, Ashutosh Chaudhary, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.228 of 2014 in the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as evidenced by a death certificate annexed to a police report. The court examined the applicable provision, Section 394 of the Code of …
The appellant Mahendra Singh filed a criminal appeal, but during the pendency the appellant died, as evidenced by a death certificate annexed to the police report. The court examined the report and noted that under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section 435 of …
The appellant, Rajeev Kumar Rai, filed a criminal appeal against the State of Bihar. During the pendency of the appeal, the Superintendent of Police reported that the appellant had died. Under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik …
The appellant, Badri Narain Khan, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.767 of 2007 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant was found to be deceased, as reported by the Superintendent of Police and the Police Inspector. The Court examined Section 394 of the Code of …
The appellant, Dharambir Paswan, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.241 of 2007 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the police informed the court that the appellant had died. The court examined the letter and report under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 …
The appellant, Kaushalya Devi, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.500 of 2007 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the court received a police letter confirming that the appellant had died. The court examined the applicability of Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, …
The appellant, Chandra Bhushan Sharma, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.133 of 2013 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, and a death certificate was produced by the police. No near relative filed an application for leave to continue the appeal after the …
The appellant, Kamal Deo Singh, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.330 of 2012 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, and a death certificate was produced by the Superintendent of Police. The court examined the report and noted that no near relative had …
Kalpana Kumari filed a criminal appeal against the State of Bihar. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, and a death certificate was produced. Under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (now Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023), an appeal may be …
The petitioners, members of two branches of the same family, sought quashing of criminal proceedings arising from a family dispute over property partition. The original cases involved allegations of assault, theft and criminal intimidation under various IPC sections, filed by each side against the …
The petitioner, Gaurav Kumar, was charged under IPC Section 354A, several provisions of the SC/ST Act, and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act for allegedly raping the minor daughter of an informant. He applied for regular bail, arguing that five prosecution witnesses had turned hostile and that no …
Manoj Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a cyber‑case (Gopalganj PS Case No.12 of 2023) involving alleged offences under IPC sections 420, 406, 467, 468 and 471. The prosecution alleged that Vinod Kumar was caught with Rs.3,00,000 in a hawala transaction and claimed that the petitioner …
The petitioner applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under IPC sections 384 (extortion) and 506 (criminal intimidation) and POCSO Act sections 4 and 12, alleging that he had obtained and was threatening to publish sexual images of a minor for ransom. The prosecution alleged that the …
The petitioner, Rameshbhai Chamanlal Moliya, filed a criminal revision seeking relief from a conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, originally imposed by a magistrate and affirmed by a Sessions Court. During the pendency of the proceedings, the parties settled …
The appellants Hetram, Shanker and Bhudat were convicted by the Sessions Court for rape under Section 376 IPC based on testimonies of three eyewitnesses and a medical report that showed no injuries. They appealed under Section 374 CrPC, arguing that the FIR was delayed, witness statements were …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Counsel for the applicant informed the court that the application had become infructuous. The court, relying on this statement, dismissed the application as infructuous. No further arguments or evidence were …
The appellants Jaipal and Ranvir were convicted by the Sessions Court for offences including rioting, voluntarily causing hurt and common intention under Sections 147, 148, 323 and 149 of the IPC, and were released on probation bonds. They appealed, contending that the prosecution witnesses were …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498A, 323 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The dispute arose from matrimonial discord and the parties had reached a full …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 22414 of 2024) instituted by the State of U.P. for offences under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 354-A, 427 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The High Court …
Ankit Kumar filed a revision under Section 319 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to summon five alleged accomplices in a murder case, alleging that the trial court had mechanically rejected his application without applying judicial mind. He argued that the accused were present at the scene, that Section 106 of …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Ravindra Kumar Nirmal under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with FIR No. 0087 of 2023, which alleged offences under IPC sections 186, 323, 332, 353, 447, 504 and 506. The applicant argued that …
Mukesh filed a revision petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the order of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Etah, which dismissed his criminal complaint against Randheer Singh and others. The petition sought to invoke the High Court's revisional jurisdiction directly. The Court …
The applicants filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the criminal case (Criminal Case No. 1347 of 2025) pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Moradabad. The court examined the record and found that the material on file did …
The applicants, Rajeev Kumar and three others, were charged under IPC sections 452, 323, 504 and 506 in Criminal Case No. 9760 of 2019. They filed a Section 482 application seeking quash of the proceedings, alleging that the dispute with the key prosecution witness (Opposite Party No.2) had been …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 21‑10‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 06‑12‑2024 in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506, 406 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Delhi Police …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 16‑01‑2026 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge/FTC, Varanasi, which had remitted the matter back to an Executive Magistrate for fresh consideration. The applicants argued that the …
The applicants, Mujahid Hussain and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicants expressed a desire to withdraw the application. The State's counsel raised no objection to the …
The applicant, Nikhil Mittar, filed an application under Section 528 seeking quash of a chargesheet and cognizance order relating to alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 506 IPC arising from a land‑registration dispute. The court observed that the dispute was essentially civil, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 69913 of 2024) arising from a matrimonial dispute that they claim has been resolved by compromise. The court examined the record and observed that the …
The applicant, Amir Ansari, filed a petition under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 5 March 2021 that framed charges against him in a trial for offences under Sections 376, 354‑D, 506 of the IPC and Section 67 of the IT Act. The petition was filed on 8 …
The applicant, Pavan Bind, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 299 of 2025) involving alleged violations of Section 317 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act. He claimed the charges were false and based on a planted recovery, arguing that his prolonged …
Surendra Nath Rai, a government servant, was summoned in a criminal proceeding (Case No. 3454 of 1999) for offences under IPC sections 147, 504, 342, 323 and 306. He filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the summoning order on the ground that no …
The applicant, Pokhpal, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to set aside an order dated 13 January 2026 passed by the Special Judge (E.C. Act) in Aligarh, which had rejected his earlier application under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The impugned order arose …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Evidence Act challenging an interim maintenance order dated 15‑07‑2025 passed by the Additional District Judge, Barabanki, under Section 125 of the CrPC. The applicant claimed that the order requiring a monthly payment of Rs.5,000 to …
The applicant, Ajay Pandey, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 13 March 2025 in a case pending before the ACJM Court in Deoria, which alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 191(2), 352, 351(3) and 324(4) of the Indian Penal …
The petitioner, N.K. Jairath, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, the petitioner expressed a desire not to pursue the application and sought its withdrawal. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted a request to …
The petitioners, Akash Sonkar, filed a criminal revision challenging an interim maintenance order dated 03.01.2025 passed by the Principal Judge of Family Court No.1, Meerut, under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The revision was filed 327 days after the impugned order, prompting a …
The appellants, Nasir and Guddu, were initially named in an FIR but were later exonerated by the investigating officer after a re‑statement by the complainant on 26 November 2022, resulting in a charge‑sheet only against co‑accused Nanhe and Maqsood. Two years later, during trial, the complainant …
The appellants Vikram and two others appealed against a Special Judge's order rejecting their discharge application under Section 227 Cr.P.C. The case involved charges under Section 3(1)(r) of the SC/ST Act and Sections 452 and 506 of the IPC. The appellants argued that the alleged insult occurred …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application under CrPC Section 482 filed by Dr. Raj Roop, who claimed he was falsely implicated in a rape case and that the relationship with the victim was consensual. The applicant argued that the pending Section 528 application and lack …
The applicant, Jahid Ali, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 28‑10‑2025, the cognizance order dated 17‑1‑2026, and the criminal proceedings (Case No. 461 of 2026) arising from FIR No. 269 of 2025 that alleged offences under …
The petitioner, Faizan @ Bablu, accused of offences under Sections 376, 354, 384, 506 IPC and Section 67(a) of the IT Act, filed an application under Section 207 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the sealed pen‑drive containing a video of the victim. The trial court rejected the application, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside two interlocutory orders dated 04-10-2024 and 21-09-2024 passed by the trial court in a criminal case (MU/AS 559/2019) involving alleged offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 307 of the IPC and the Dowry …
The applicant, Ashok Kumar Seth, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 25‑April‑2015 and the cognizance order dated 22‑May‑2015 in State v. Ashok Kumar Seth (Case No. 5851/2015), which arose from FIR No. 125/2015 alleging …
The applicant, Ashok Kumar Seth, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the quashing of a charge sheet dated 25 May 2015 and a cognizance order dated 9 June 2015 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Varanasi, in criminal case No. 446/2019 relating to …
The applicants, Kaptan Singh and eleven others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 20‑10‑2021, the cognizance and summoning order dated 10‑02‑2022, and the entire proceedings of Case No. 5209 of 2024 relating to offences under …
The applicant, Mohd Rahil, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a case arising from alleged offences under several IPC sections. He alleged false implication, claiming the investigation was improper and …
The applicant filed a Section 482 CrPC application seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 11‑06‑2021 and the proceedings of case No. 2576 of 2022 (State vs Vindhyachal et al.) arising from a 2018 offence under IPC sections 272, 273 and Excise Act sections 60, 72. The applicant alleged that no offence …
The applicant, Sanjay Kumar Sonkar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the entire criminal proceeding (Case No. 2571 of 2019) filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh, which involved offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 406 of the Indian Penal …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance order, bailable warrant and non‑bailable warrant dated 4 March 2025 issued by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kanpur Dehat, in S.S.T. No. 82 of 2011 (State of U.P. vs. …
The applicants, Saddam Husain and another, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a rape case (Crime No. 179 of 2025). They claimed innocence, alleging that the victim's statement under Section 180 CrPC showed no abduction or rape and that there was no credible …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 15‑10‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 27‑01‑2026, and the entire criminal proceedings in Case No. 39 of 2026 (State v. Hemant & others). The High Court …
The applicant Tushar filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the quashing of a charge sheet dated 27‑09‑2021 and the cognizance order dated 03‑12‑2022 in State v. Ajay Goswami (Case No. 27644 of 2022), which alleged offences under Sections 323, 325 and 506 of …
The applicant, Pushpendra Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order dated March 2023 in a case involving alleged offences under sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B IPC. The applicant alleged false …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge-sheet dated 12‑10‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 24‑12‑2025, and the entire criminal proceedings in Case No. 342 of 2026 arising from FIR No. 413 of 2025. The High Court …
The revisionist alleged that a group of persons assaulted Sarswati Devi, stole cash and jewellery, and committed trespass on disputed property, filing an application under Section 173(4) CrPC seeking registration of an FIR. The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate treated the application as a …
The applicant sought to quash the charge sheet and the magistrate's cognizance order under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, alleging a three‑day delay in filing the FIR and that the investigating officer had not properly inquired before filing the charge sheet. The State opposed the …
Ranvijay Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 39085 of 2025) instituted by the State of Uttar Pradesh under Sections 406, 419 and 420 of the IPC. The applicant contended that Sections 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 …
Lal Chandra filed a criminal revision challenging the order dated 06.03.2026 of the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Kanpur, which directed maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code in the case Shweta Sen vs Lal Chandra. The revisionist sought to set aside that order and …
The applicant, Hari Narayan Rai, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the entire criminal proceeding (Case No. 3372 of 2018) initiated by the State of U.P. The case involved charges under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 406 of the IPC. The applicant contended that …
The applicants, Avdhesh Kumar and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Pankaj Kumar Mishra, sought permission to withdraw the application, citing that the trial court had already proceeded to frame …
The applicant, Ajay Shekhar Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 30‑04‑2025 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Varanasi, in a case arising from a 1999 FIR under IPC sections 457, 411 and 380. The High Court examined the …
The applicants Subhash Kumar, Ram Kripal and three others filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the quash of a chargesheet dated 18‑04‑2024, the cognizance order dated 08‑04‑2025, and the entire proceedings of State v. Subhash Kumar (Case No. 652 of 2025) …
The applicant, Lucky, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking a direction that the trial courts allow a single surety bond for four separate criminal cases, relying on a Supreme Court decision in Hani Nishad v. State of U.P. The State opposed the prayer. The court noted that the …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 06-10-2023, the cognizance and summoning order dated 20-12-2024, and the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 7225 of 2024 (State vs. Arvind Yadav and others) relating to …
The applicant, Kailash Giri, filed an application before the Allahabad High Court under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Subsequently, the applicant expressed a desire not to pursue the application and sought its withdrawal. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted a request to …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the entire proceedings of State vs. Ramprakash Yadav (Case No.4732 of 2020) involving offences under several IPC sections and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Act. The High Court examined the FIR, the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 28.05.2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 04.11.2025, and the entire proceedings in State v. Jagdeesh and others (Case No. 156601 of 2025). The court examined the …
The revisionist, Devendra Singh, filed a criminal revision seeking to set aside a family court order dated 09.03.2026 that secured amounts deducted in an execution case. He contended that earlier maintenance orders under Section 125 Cr.P.C. had been enhanced under Section 127 Cr.P.C., and he was …
Smt. Chitrarekha filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 13‑03‑2024 issued in State v. Sunita (Case No.01 of 2007). She limited her prayer to obtaining a direction that, if she surrenders within three weeks and applies for …
The applicants, Furqan and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 23772 of 2025) arising from FIR No. 193 of 2022 alleging offences under Sections 307, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The High Court examined the FIR, …
The applicant, Sonu Tiwari, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the order dated 30 July 2024 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhadohi, and the entire proceedings in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments …
The applicants, Zeeshan and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the order dated 13‑11‑2025 that rejected their discharge application in a case involving offences under Sections 323, 504, 506, 452, 325 and 308 IPC. They alleged false implication, collusion …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Complaint No. 18553/2022) arising from allegations under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 406, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had settled their dispute through the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 12‑11‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 01‑01‑2026, and the entire proceedings in Case No. 48 of 2026 arising from FIR charges under IPC sections 110, 118(1), …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Smt Chhavi, who is the sister‑in‑law of a deceased person alleged to have been murdered. The applicant claimed the death was a suicide, citing the post‑mortem report showing a hanging with no other injuries and an intact hyoid bone, and argued …
The applicants, Arun Kumar and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 19‑09‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 06‑03‑2025, and the entire proceedings of Case No. 2014 of 2026 (State v. Vikas et al.) …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 07-08-2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 05-02-2026, and the entire proceedings of case No. 2451 of 2026 arising from FIR containing offences under various IPC …
Anand filed a criminal revision under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code alleging that his deceased sister had been kidnapped and forced into marriage, and that the opposite parties had threatened his life. The Judicial Magistrate rejected the application, directing a preliminary police …
The applicant, Hemant Kumar Verma, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash non‑bailable warrant orders dated 07.03.2026 and 25.03.2026 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhansi, in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments …
The applicant, Pankaj, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the chargesheet and cognizance/summoning order dated 09.12.2024 in Criminal Case No.18513 of 2024, where he was charged under Sections 420, 406 and 120‑B IPC. The applicant contended that Sections 420 …
The applicant, Mukesh Patel, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking an expeditious disposal of Session Trial No. 223 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506, 325, 308 and 304 of the IPC. The FIR was lodged in 2024 and the charge was …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 CrPC by Bidura Digal, who was implicated in an NDPS case involving 42 kg of ganja. The applicant argued false implication, lack of independent witness during arrest, and asserted no criminal history, …
The applicant, Smt. Radhika Devi, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking an expeditious disposal of a recovery case (No. 298/XII/2018) filed under Section 31(1) of the Domestic Violence Act. The recovery case, arising from a domestic violence petition filed on …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the entire criminal proceeding (Criminal Case No.11908 of 2025) arising from FIR and chargesheet under various IPC sections. The High Court examined the FIR, the impugned order, the chargesheet and …
The applicant, Smt Upasna, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking an expeditious disposal of a pending domestic violence case (Case No. 401 of 2025) filed under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. The case had been pending since 29 …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Criminal Procedure Code for Sushil Kumar Shukla, who was implicated in a case involving alleged fraudulent sale deeds and multiple IPC offences. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, the FIR was lodged with …
The revisionist Kanhaiya Maurya filed a criminal revision challenging the trial court's rejection of his discharge application in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He argued that the cheque amount had been repaid, that the opposite party had not returned the cheque, …
The applicant, Nagendra Gupta, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking quashal of the order that rejected his discharge application in a rape case. He alleged that the FIR was false, he was elsewhere in his shop (supported by CCTV), and that the prosecution had not conducted a …
Aman Gaund was arrested in connection with Crime No. 25 of 2026, charged under multiple sections of the Criminal Procedure Code, the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial, arguing that a co‑accused, Nitesh Vishwarkarma, had already been released on bail and …
The applicant, Vasudev, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking an order to expedite a criminal case (Case No. 1037 of 2012, crime no. 374 of 2008) pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.2, Fatehpur since 2008. He argued that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dayashankar, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the Bihar Narcotic Substances (BNS) Act, and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement under Section 183 BNSS indicated that she had …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rajesh Kumar, who was arrested in connection with a murder case (Crime No.23 of 2026) under Sections 103(1), 238A and 61(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The applicant argued that the FIR and investigation specifically implicated the co‑accused …
Anand @ Ikrar Khan was charged in a Bareilly case under several IPC sections including 333, 64, 352, 115(2), 351(2) and 308, with the alleged victim being a married woman. The victim’s statement under Section 183 of the CrPC indicated a personal motive related to a family dispute, and there was a …
Dr. Munishwar Gupta filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a criminal complaint (case no. 889/2020) filed by the State of U.P. under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant argued that the dispute was essentially a monetary one and could be settled …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 10‑10‑2025, a summoning order dated 07‑06‑2024, and the entire proceedings of case No.1064 of 2022 (State of U.P. v. Ajay Sharma) under Section 354 IPC. The High Court …
The applicant, Azmal, was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 197 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2) of the IPC and Section 61(2) of the CrPC. He contended that his name did not appear in the FIR and that he was implicated only through a …
The High Court of Allahabad entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed by Asif in a case registered as Crime No. 131 of 2026, alleging offences under Sections 303(2), 317(2) and 317(5) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed he was …
The applicant, Dilip Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 25203 of 2024) instituted by the State of Uttar Pradesh against Surjeet and others under IPC sections 498‑A, 323, 506 and 341. The High Court …
Abdul Hakeem alias Munna filed a criminal revision under Section 227 of the Criminal Procedure Code challenging the Additional Sessions Judge's order rejecting his application for discharge. He argued that the trial court failed to apply judicial mind to the facts and evidence. The State opposed, …
The applicant filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 21‑08‑2024 in Criminal Case No. 10795 of 2024, which alleged offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC. The applicant contended, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi Race Club …
The applicant, Devesh Kanaujia, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Complaint No. 4674 of 2012) arising from a 2007 case under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties, including the complainant Mamta …
The applicant, Swapnendra Singh, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking expeditious disposal of a pending criminal trial (Sessions Case No. 615 of 2022) involving offences under Sections 323, 504, 506, 364 and 392 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued …
The applicant, Ansar Ahmad, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bail and Security of the State (BNSS) Act seeking to quash the summons, warrant and the entire criminal proceeding (Complaint No.27 of 2025) initiated under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He contended that the …
Gaurav Goyal filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mathura, to frame charges and expedite the disposal of State vs. Ajay Kumar Jain (Case No. 3155 of 2019) arising from a 2013 FIR involving offences …
The applicant, Arif Khan, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking an order directing the Special Judge (DAA) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑social Activities Act, Hamirpur, to expedite the trial of criminal miscellaneous case No. 113 of 2025 (State v. …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the proceedings of Special Case No. 405 of 2018, which arose from a criminal case under IPC sections 354, 504, 506 and POCSO Act sections 7/8, and to set aside a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) and the proceedings under …
