UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.versusSUNIL TRIPATHI ETC. ETC.
2018 INSC 65331 July 2018Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined appeals by the Union of India and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) against a Delhi High Court order that directed the CBI to convert three preliminary enquiries into FIRs/RCs and to complete the investigation. The CBI argued that its preliminary enquiries concluded there was no invol…
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusFAROOK MOHAMMED KASIM MAPKAR & ORS.
2010 INSC 46130 July 2010Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined an appeal by the State of Maharashtra challenging a Bombay High Court order that directed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to register a case and investigate the 1993 Hari Masjid incident, where police fire caused six deaths. The State argued that the High Court should not have exerc…
BINOD KUMARversusSTATE OF JHARKHAND AND ORS.
2011 INSC 23429 March 2011Dismissed
The case concerned a multi‑crore iron‑ore mining lease scam involving former ministers of Jharkhand, including a former chief minister, with allegations of illicit wealth amassed through abuse of official position. The High Court, noting the complexity and trans‑national nature of the alleged investments, referred the …
COMMON CAUSEversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
2017 INSC 115228 November 2017Dismissed
The public‑interest litigation filed by Common Cause challenged the appointment of Shri Rakesh Asthana as Special Director of the CBI, alleging that the Selection Committee had not taken a decision and that the appointment was illegal, arbitrary and tainted by pending investigations. The Court examined the Delhi Specia…
MANOJ NARULAversusUNION OF INDIA
2014 INSC 56827 August 2014Disposed off
The petition challenged the appointment of several Union Ministers on the ground that they had criminal antecedents or were facing charges for serious offences, seeking a declaration that such appointments were unconstitutional and requesting the Court to frame guidelines for ministerial appointments. The Court examine…
POOJA PALversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2016 INSC 8622 January 2016Appeal(s) allowed
Pooja Pal, the widow of slain MLA Raju Pal, alleged that the state police and administration were complicit or indifferent in the murder of her husband and sought a fresh investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). The High Court dismissed her writ petition, but the Supreme Court held that when an inves…
NAHAR SINGH YADAV & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2010 INSC 79019 November 2010Dismissed
The Supreme Court considered an application by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to transfer the trial of the Ghaziabad Provident Fund scam from the Special Judge, CBI, Ghaziabad to a court in Delhi. The case involved alleged fraudulent withdrawals of government funds by former court officials and judges. The C…
COMMON CAUSE & ANRversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.
2019 INSC 22819 February 2019Dismissed
Common Cause and an RTI activist filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking to quash the appointment of Mr. Nageshwar Rao as interim Director of the CBI and to compel the Union of India to appoint a regular Director in accordance with Section 4A of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946. They also demande…
MANOHAR LAL SHARMAversusTHE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ORS.
2013 INSC 83917 December 2013Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined whether Section 6A of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946, which requires prior Central Government approval for CBI investigations into senior officials, applies when the investigation is being monitored by the Court itself. The Court noted that the CBI had initiated investigatio…
M/S. FERTICO MARKETING AND INVESTMENT PVT. LTD AND ORS. ETC.versusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND ANOTHER ETC.
2020 INSC 64517 November 2020Disposed off
The case arose from a CBI investigation into alleged corruption involving Fertico Marketing and Investment Pvt. Ltd., its director, and two public servants of Uttar Pradesh. The CBI registered an FIR under IPC sections 120B and 420 and the Prevention of Corruption Act without obtaining prior consent from the State unde…
STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.versusTHE COMMITTEE FOR PROTECTION OF DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS, WEST BENGAL & ORS
2010 INSC 10417 February 2010Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined whether a High Court, exercising its jurisdiction under Article 226, could direct the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to investigate a cognizable offence that occurred within a State's territory without the State's consent, in light of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (S…
LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL U.P. LUCKNOW & ORS.versusSUSHIL KUMAR & ORS.
2025 INSC 124116 October 2025Disposed off
The Uttar Pradesh Legislative Council’s recruitment process for staff was challenged on grounds of unfairness, arbitrariness and collusiveness, leading to writ petitions and a special appeal. The High Court, while hearing the special appeal, directed a suo motu public interest litigation and ordered a preliminary enqui…
ROHIT CHATURVEDIversusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND & OTHERS
2026 INSC 49015 May 2026Disposed off
The petitioner, Rohit Chaturvedi, was convicted for murder under Sections 120B and 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment in 2007. After serving more than twenty‑two years, he sought premature release, which was recommended by the Uttarakhand State Government but rejected by the Ministry of Home Affairs in a letter…
AKHILESH YADAV ETC. ETC.versusVISHWANATH CHATURVEDI & ORS.
2012 INSC 60713 December 2012Disposed off
The Supreme Court reviewed a 2007 order that directed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to inquire into alleged disproportionate assets of a political family and to submit its report to the Union of India. The petitioners sought a review, arguing that the Court lacked jurisdiction to order a CBI inquiry without…
LALITA KUMARIversusGOVT. OF U.P. AND ORS.
2013 INSC 74812 November 2013Reference answered
The Constitution Bench examined whether a police officer must register a First Information Report (FIR) under Section 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) upon receiving information of a cognizable offence, or may first conduct a preliminary inquiry to test its veracity. Relying on the literal meaning of …
CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENT AND FOOD SECURITYversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2011 INSC 38512 May 2011Heard
The Centre for Environment and Food Security filed a public‑interest writ petition seeking directions to ensure proper implementation of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, 2005 (MGNREGA) and its schemes, alleging fund diversion and irregularities, particularly in Orissa. The Supreme Court, afte…
SURENDRA KOLIversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.
2025 INSC 130811 November 2025Appeal(s) allowed
Surendra Koli, a former domestic help at the Nithari residence, was convicted for the murder, rape and related offences of a minor based on a Section 164 confession and alleged discoveries under Section 27 of the Evidence Act. The Supreme Court had earlier affirmed his conviction and death sentence in 2011, and a revie…
VIJAY RAJMOHANversusSTATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CBI, ACB, CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU
2022 INSC 106611 October 2022Dismissed
Vijay Rajmohan, a Central Secretariat Service officer, was alleged to have amassed disproportionate assets and was investigated by the CBI, which sought sanction for prosecution under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act from the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT). The DoPT consulted the Central Vigi…
CBIversusR.R. KISHORE
2023 INSC 81711 September 2023Matter referred to larger bench
The CBI registered a case against Dr. R.R. Kishore for alleged bribery under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, but conducted the investigation without the prior approval of the Central Government required by Section 6A(1) of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946. The Delhi High Court allowed the trial …
DR. JAYA THAKURversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS
2023 INSC 61611 July 2023Disposed off
The petitioners challenged the Central Vigilance Commission (Amendment) Act, 2021, the Delhi Special Police Establishment (Amendment) Act, 2021 and the Fundamental (Amendment) Rules, 2021 on the ground that they allowed arbitrary extensions of the tenure of the Director of Enforcement and the Director of CBI, thereby e…
THE STATE OF WEST BENGALversusUNION OF INDIA
2024 INSC 50210 July 2024Directions issued
The State of West Bengal filed an original suit under Article 131 of the Constitution seeking a declaration that the Union of India’s registration of cases by the CBI after the State withdrew its consent under Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment (DSPE) Act is unconstitutional, and asked for an injunctio…
BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (CBI) AND ANR.versusTHOMMANDRU HANNAH VIJAYALAKSHMI @ T. H. VIJAYALAKSHMI AND ANR.
2021 INSC 6438 October 2021Appeal(s) allowed
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) registered an FIR against a senior Income Tax Commissioner and her husband, alleging possession of assets disproportionate to their known sources of income under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The respondents challenged the FIR, arguing that the CBI should have conduct…
ALOK KUMAR VERMAversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.
2019 INSC 368 January 2019Disposed off
The Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) and the Government of India issued orders on 23 October 2018 divesting Director Alok Kumar Verma of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) of his powers, functions and supervisory role. The Director challenged the legality of these orders, arguing that under Section 4B(2) of th…
SUBHASH CHANDversusSTATE (DELHI ADMINISTRATION)
2013 INSC 158 January 2013Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a food manufacturer, was charged under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act after a complaint by the Local Health Authority and was acquitted by a Metropolitan Magistrate. The State sought to appeal the acquittal in the Sessions Court under Section 378(1)(a) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, wh…
HEMAversusSTATE, THR. INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MADRAS
2013 INSC 97 January 2013Disposed off
The appellant, a clerk in a travel agency, was convicted under sections 120B, 420, 511, 465 and 471 of the IPC for conspiring to obtain 42 passports using forged applications and documents. The prosecution alleged that the travel agency, run by a co‑accused, submitted ante‑dated applications with duplicate file numbers…
MS. MAYAWATIversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2012 INSC 2726 July 2012Case Allowed
Mayawati, then Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh, filed a writ petition under Article 32 challenging FIR No. RC 0062003A0019 dated 05.10.2003, which the CBI had lodged under Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act alleging disproportionate assets. The FIR was said to be based on a Sup…
DR. SUBRAMANIAN SWAMYversusDIRECTOR, CENTERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ANR.
2014 INSC 3586 May 2014Case Allowed
The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of Section 6‑A of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (inserted by Section 26(c) of the Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003), which required prior approval of the Central Government before the CBI could inquire into or investigate alleged offences u…
UNION OF INDIAversusV. SRIHARAN @ MURUGAN & ORS.
2015 INSC 8862 December 2015Reference answered
The case arose from the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, for which several accused were convicted and sentenced to death, later commuted to life imprisonment by the Supreme Court. The State of Tamil Nadu proposed to remit the life sentences of the convicts, prompting the Union of India to file a wri…
LALU PRASAD YADAVversusSTATE OF BIHAR & ANR.
2010 INSC 1881 April 2010Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined whether the State of Bihar could file an appeal under Section 378(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against an acquittal rendered by a Special CBI Judge when the offence was investigated by the Delhi Special Police Establishment (CBI). The Court held that the opening words "save as o…
ASHOK KUMAR TODIversusKISHWAR JAHAN & ORS.
2011 INSC 1701 March 2011Disposed off
Rizwanur Rahman married Priyanka Todi under the Special Marriage Act. After the marriage, police officials repeatedly interfered, threatened the couple and later the deceased was found dead on railway tracks. The mother and brother of the deceased filed a writ petition seeking transfer of the investigation from the Sta…
THE STATE, CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONversusA. SATISH KUMAR & ORS.
2025 INSC 111 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) filed appeals against a High Court order that quashed FIRs and subsequent proceedings against two Central Government employees accused of offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The respondents argued that, following the bifurcation of Andhra Pradesh, the CBI req…