Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948

3 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

THE BANGALORE TURF CLUB LTD.versusREGIONAL DIRECTOR, EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION

2014 INSC 98631 July 2014Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether race clubs such as the Bangalore Turf Club and the Royal Western India Turf Club, as well as a chit fund, fall within the definition of "shop" under the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (ESI Act) and the related notifications. The Court held that a race club is an "establishment"

ROYAL WESTERN INDIA TURF CLUB LTD.versusE.S.I. CORPORATION & ORS.

2016 INSC 22129 February 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether casual workers employed by Royal Western India Turf Club Ltd. on race days fell within the definition of "employee" under Section 2(9) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, and consequently whether the club was liable to pay ESI contributions from the 1978-79 period. Relying on

MANAGALORE PORT TRUSTversusTHE REGIONAL DIRECTOR, ESI CORPORATION, BANGALORE, KARNATAKA

2014 INSC 74328 October 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The New Mangalore Port Listed Workers Managing Committee was created in 1983 to provide stevedores for loading and unloading cargo at the New Mangalore Port Trust (NMPT) and was dissolved on 15 March 1990 when its workers were absorbed into NMPT as a cargo‑handling wing. The Committee challenged a Karnataka State Gover

DELHI GYMKHANA CLUB LTD.versusEMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPN.

2014 INSC 74228 October 2014Dismissed

The Delhi Gymkhana Club Ltd., a members' club with a kitchen and catering division employing more than twenty workers, was held by the Employees' State Insurance Corporation to be covered under the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 and was ordered to pay contributions for the period 1980-1985. The club challenged th

DAIVSHALA & ORS.versusORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ANR

2025 INSC 90428 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed

Shahu Sampatrao Jadhavar, a night watchman, died in a road accident on 22 April 2003 while commuting 5 km to his sugar factory workplace. His family claimed compensation under the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923, but the employer and insurer argued the accident did not arise out of or in the course of employment beca

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.versusKAMLESH AND OTHERS.

2025 INSC 72428 April 2025Disposed off

The claimants, legal heirs of a government employee who died in a motor accident, were awarded Rs.37,85,800 compensation by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. The insurer, New India Assurance Co., appealed seeking deduction of the financial assistance payable under the Haryana Compensation Assistance Rules, 2006, whil

BAKSHI SECURITY AND PERSONNEL SERVICES PVT. LTDversusDEVKISHAN COMPUTED PVT. LTD. AND ORS.

2016 INSC 55926 July 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The Gujarat Transport Department floated a tender for manpower services with conditions that the salary paid must not be less than the minimum wage and that bids must be fixed, not open‑ended. Three bidders qualified; the Technical Evaluation Committee fixed a minimum‑wage figure of Rs 3,00,92,346, rendering the bids o

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, HASSAN CO-OPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS SOCIETY UNION LIMITEDversusTHE ASSISTANT REGIONAL DIRECTOR EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION

2010 INSC 24326 April 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether two cooperative milk producer societies were liable to pay Employees' State Insurance (ESI) contributions for workers employed by contractors to transport milk. The societies argued that the contractors' workers were neither directly employed by them nor worked on their premises or un

HEMANT KUMAR VERMA & ORS.versusEMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION & ORS.

2022 INSC 74422 July 2022Dismissed

The petitioners, junior resident doctors employed on a contractual bond in ESIC medical colleges, sought inclusion in the 50% "in‑service" reservation for postgraduate medical seats that is available to Insurance Medical Officers Grade‑II (IMO‑II) recruited permanently by ESIC. They argued that both categories possess

EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION & ANR.versusMANGALAM PUBLICATIONS (I) PRIVATE LIMITED

2017 INSC 97321 September 2017Appeal(s) allowed

The Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) sought contribution from Mangalam Publications, a private limited company, for interim relief payments made to its employees between April 1996 and March 2000. The company argued that the interim relief was an ex‑gratia payment, not "wages" under Section 2(22) of the Em

THE ESI CORPORATIONversusM/S. RADHIKA THEATRE

2023 INSC 6020 January 2023Appeal(s) allowed

The ESI Corporation issued demand notices to M/s Radhika Theatre for ESI contributions after the theatre stopped paying contributions in 1989, arguing that the amendment to Section 1(6) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (effective 20 Oct 1989) made every establishment liable irrespective of employee count. Th

THE EMPLOYEES’ STATE INSURANCE CORPORATIONversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2022 INSC 7720 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The Employees’ State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) appealed against a Karnataka High Court order that had upheld promotions of its teaching staff under the Dynamic Assured Career Progression (DACP) Scheme. The respondents, who joined ESIC as Assistant Professors between February 2014 and June 2016, claimed promotion to

THE EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION & ORS.versusM/S KEY DEE COLD STORAGE PVT. LTD.

2022 INSC 60219 May 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) appealed against a Guwahati High Court order that held its 21 July 1999 notification under Section 1(3) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, applied only to areas within the Silchar Municipal Corporation, thereby excluding the respondent M/s Key Dee Cold Storage

DHROPADABAI AND OTHERSversusM/S. TECHNOCRAFT TOOLINGS

2015 INSC 97719 March 2015Dismissed

The deceased employee, Ambadas Lahane, died while on duty and his legal heirs claimed compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923. The employer contended that the employee was an "insured person" under the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, and therefore barred from any claim under the 1923 Act pursuant

ADIRAJ MANPOWER SERVICES PVT. LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE PUNE

2022 INSC 20118 February 2022Dismissed

The appellant, Adiraj Manpower Services Pvt. Ltd., a manpower recruitment agency, entered into agreements with Sigma Electric Manufacturing to supply personnel for various manufacturing activities. The Commissioner of Central Excise issued a show‑cause notice alleging that the appellant had failed to assess and pay ser

AJAY RAJ SHETTYversusDIRECTOR & ANR.

2025 INSC 50017 April 2025Dismissed

The appellant, Ajay Raj Shetty, who was employed as General Manager/Technical Coordinator of M/s Electriex (India) Ltd., was convicted under Section 85(i)(b) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 for failing to remit ESI contributions that had been deducted from employees' wages. The issue before the Supreme Cour

CHECKMATE SERVICES P. LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1

2022 INSC 106912 October 2022Dismissed

The appellants, including Checkmate Services Pvt. Ltd., deposited employees' EPF and ESI contributions after the statutory due dates and claimed deductions under s.36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer disallowed the deduction, holding that the amounts constituted "income" under s.2(24)(x) and we

DAYA KISHAN JOSHI & ANR.versusDYNEMECH SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.

2017 INSC 7269 August 2017Disposed off

The appellant, father of a deceased employee, claimed compensation under the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 after the employee died in a road accident while returning from a field assignment. The Commissioner and the High Court dismissed the claim, holding the accident was not "arising out of and in the course of em

THE EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATIONversusM/S TEXMO INDUSTRIES

2021 INSC 1678 March 2021Dismissed

The Employees State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) inspected Texmo Industries and found that the company had underpaid ESI contributions by including conveyance allowance in the wage base. Texmo contested, arguing that conveyance allowance is not "wages" under Section 2(22) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948. Th

EMPLOYEES’ STATE INSURANCE CORPORATIONversusVENUS ALLOY PVT. LTD.

2019 INSC 1435 February 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The Employees’ State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) observed that Venus Alloy Pvt. Ltd., though covered under the Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948, had not paid ESI contributions on the remuneration paid to its directors. ESIC issued an order on 6 April 2005 directing the company to make the contribution, which the c

SARDAR NIRMAL SINGH (DEAD) THR. LRS.versusBHATIA SAFE WORKS & ANR.

2016 INSC 11713 March 2016Disposed off

The appellant sought to enforce an auction sale of a plot in Kanpur that had been conducted to recover land revenue under the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948. The auction was held a day after notice, the successful bidder deposited the required 25% by cheque and later by bank draft, both of which were rejected, and

ZUARI CEMENT LTD.versusREGIONAL DIRECTOR E.S.L.C. HYDERABAD & ORS.

2015 INSC 4702 July 2015Dismissed

Zuari Cement Ltd. had previously obtained exemption from the Employees State Insurance (ESI) scheme under Section 87 of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 for 1986‑1993, but its application for renewal for 1993‑2001 was rejected, leading to demand notices for contributions. The High Court directed the company to a

MCLEOD RUSSEL INDIA LIMITEDversusREG. PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, JALPAIGURI

2014 INSC 4572 July 2014Dismissed

The case concerned a tea estate (Mathura Tea Estate) that defaulted on EPF contributions. After the estate was taken over by Eveready Industries (later McLeod Russel India Ltd.), the new management argued it was not the "employer" liable for damages under Section 148 of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search