DELHI GYMKHANA CLUB LTD.versusEMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPN.
2014 INSC 74228 October 2014Dismissed
The Delhi Gymkhana Club Ltd., a members' club with a kitchen and catering division employing more than twenty workers, was held by the Employees' State Insurance Corporation to be covered under the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 and was ordered to pay contributions for the period 1980-1985. The club challenged th…
P.B. NAYAK & ORS.versusMANAGING DIRECTOR, BHILAI STEEL PLANT & ORS.
2021 INSC 67026 October 2021Dismissed
The appellants, employees of a canteen operating in the Steel Club of Bhilai Steel Plant, challenged their dismissal under Section 58 of the Madhya Pradesh Shops and Establishments Act, 1958, arguing that the Act applied to the club. The respondents contended that the club was a "club not being a residential club" and …
BALWANT RAI SALUJA &ANR. ETC. ETC.versusAIR INDIALTD. & ORS.
2014 INSC 56125 August 2014Dismissed
The case concerned workmen employed by a contractor to run a statutory canteen on the premises of Air India, which under Section 46 of the Factories Act, 1948, must provide such a facility. The workmen claimed they were deemed employees of Air India and sought regularisation and other employment benefits. The Supreme C…
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.versusSARVA SHRAMIK SANGH, SANGLI AND ORS.
2013 INSC 70821 October 2013Disposed off
The State of Maharashtra terminated the services of 256 workmen employed on 25 lift‑irrigation schemes after transferring the schemes to a sugar factory. The workmen claimed entitlement to reinstatement and backwages, arguing that the termination was a breach of Section 25N of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, while t…
CURRENCY NOTE PRESS & ANR.versusN. N. SARDESAI & ORS.
2018 INSC 62520 July 2018Dismissed
The Currency Note Press, a government-owned corporation, was sued by 17 former employees who claimed overtime wages for work done between 1986 and 1990 under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Labour Court dismissed their applications, but the Bombay High Court set aside that order and granted th…
LANCO ANPARA POWER LIMITEDversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.
2016 INSC 97318 October 2016Dismissed
Lanco Anpara Power Ltd was constructing a thermal power plant and had obtained registration under the Factories Act. The State authorities issued show‑cause notices under the Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996 (BOCW Act) and the Buildings and Other Con…
SECURITY PRINTING AND MINTING CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. & ORS. ETCversusVIJAY D. KASBE AND ORS. ETC
2023 INSC 38818 April 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, supervisory employees of the Security Printing and Minting Corporation of India Ltd., claimed double overtime allowance under Section 59(1) of the Factories Act, 1948 for work performed between 1988 and 2005. Their claim arose while they were central government servants holding civil posts, and therefor…
AJAY RAJ SHETTYversusDIRECTOR & ANR.
2025 INSC 50017 April 2025Dismissed
The appellant, Ajay Raj Shetty, who was employed as General Manager/Technical Coordinator of M/s Electriex (India) Ltd., was convicted under Section 85(i)(b) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 for failing to remit ESI contributions that had been deducted from employees' wages. The issue before the Supreme Cour…
BHUSHAN POWER AND STEEL LTD. AND ORS.versusSTATE OF ORISSA AND ANR.
2012 INSC 13114 March 2012Appeal(s) allowed
Bhushan Power & Steel Ltd. (appellant) entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the State of Orissa on 15 May 2002, wherein the State agreed to recommend iron‑ore mining leases for the appellant’s integrated steel plant. After restructuring of the Bhushan group, the State claimed the MOU had ceased and dem…
BALWANT RAI SALUJA & ANR. ETC. ETC.versusAIR INDIA LTD. & ORS.
2013 INSC 75513 November 2013Matter referred to larger bench
The workmen employed in the canteen of Air India, which was operated by Chef Air, a unit of the Hotel Corporation of India (HCI), claimed they were regular employees of Air India. Air India argued that HCI was a separate legal entity and that it had no control over the workers' hiring, wages, or discipline. The Supreme…
R.R. PAREKHversusHLGH COURT OF GUJARAT & ANR.
2016 INSC 51312 July 2016Case Partly allowed
The case concerned a senior judicial officer, R.R. Parekh, who was dismissed from service after two disciplinary inquiries found him guilty of misconduct for awarding sentences below the statutory minimum under Section 135 of the Customs Act, allegedly motivated by corrupt or oblique motives. The High Court had revisit…
J.J. IRANI & ANR.versusSTATE OF JHARKHAND
2014 INSC 5358 August 2014Appeal(s) allowed
On 3 March 1989 a fire broke out at temporary pandals erected for Tata Iron and Steel Company's Foundation Day, killing and injuring many. The Inspector of Factories conducted a preliminary investigation on 5‑6 March 1989 and later received a detailed committee report on 23 April 1990; a criminal complaint was filed on…
PEOPLES RIGHTS AND SOCIAL RESEARCH CENTRE (PRASAR) & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2024 INSC 5826 August 2024
The Peoples Rights and Social Research Centre (PRASAR), a Delhi‑based NGO, filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking relief for the widespread occurrence of silicosis among workers in mining, construction, stone‑cutting and sand‑blasting industries. The petition alleged violations of fundamental rights under Artic…
NATIONAL KAMGAR UNIONversusKRAN RADER PVT. LTD. & ORS.
2018 INSC 35 January 2018Disposed off
The National Kamgar Union (appellant) challenged the closure of Kran Rader Pvt. Ltd.'s manufacturing unit, alleging that more than 100 workers were employed and that the employer failed to comply with Section 25-K of Chapter VB of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Industrial Court had held that 115 workers were em…
HEMANT MADHUSUDAN NERURKARversusSTATE OF JHARKHAND AND ANOTHER
2016 INSC 3724 May 2016Disposed off
An inspection of Tata Steel's Growth Shop and Fabrication Yard revealed violations of the Factories Act, 1948 and Bihar Factories Rules, including lack of overtime slips, absence of leave books for contract labour, and several canteen deficiencies. Cognizance was taken against the occupier, Heman Madhusudan Nerurkar, a…
MOHAN SINGH & ORS.versusTHE CHAIRMAN RAILWAY BOARD & ORS.
2015 INSC 5393 August 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants were canteen workers at the Moradabad Division of the Northern Railway who claimed that their canteen should be treated as a statutory canteen under the Factories Act, 1948 and that their services should be regularised. The respondents argued that the canteen was a non‑statutory, non‑recognised facility …
PREM SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.
2019 INSC 9832 September 2019Disposed off
Prem Singh, a welder, worked for about 37 years in a work‑charged establishment of the Uttar Pradesh government and was later regularised before superannuation. He claimed that the period spent in the work‑charged establishment should be counted as qualifying service for pension under the Uttar Pradesh Retirement Benef…
E.S.I. CORPORATION, REP. BY THE REGIONAL DIRECTORversusM/S. ENDOCRINOLOGY AND IMMUNOLOGY LAB
2023 INSC 6652 August 2023Dismissed
The case concerned whether M/s Endocrinology and Immunology Lab, a pathological laboratory, fell within the ambit of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 and, if so, from which date. The High Court had held that the lab was covered from 6 September 2007 under a Kerala government notification that extended the Act t…
THE STATE OF GOA & ANR.versusNAMITA TRIPATHI
2025 INSC 3062 March 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Goa filed a complaint alleging that the respondent's professional laundry service operated as a factory without a valid licence, violating the Factories Act, 1948. A Judicial Magistrate First Class issued summons on the basis of the complaint, but the High Court quashed the process, holding that dry‑cleani…
GUJARAT MAZDOOR SABHA & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT
2020 INSC 5721 October 2020Appeal(s) allowed
The Gujarat Mazdoor Sabha and a national trade union challenged two Gujarat State notifications issued under Section 5 of the Factories Act, 1948 that exempted all factories from provisions on working hours, rest intervals and overtime pay during the COVID‑19 pandemic. The petitioners argued that the pandemic did not c…
THE MANAGEMENT OF WORTH TRUSTversusTHE SECRETARY, WORTH TRUST WORKERS UNION
2025 INSC 4321 April 2025Dismissed
The Worth Trust, a charitable organization that also runs commercial factories, was challenged by its workers' union for payment of bonus and ex-gratia for the year 1996-97. The union argued that the workers, employed in the Trust's factories, fall within the definition of "workmen" under the Factories Act and are ther…