SMITA CONDUCTORS LTD.versusEURO ALLOYS LTD.
2001 INSC 41731 August 2001Dismissed
Smita Conductors Ltd. (appellant) and Euro Alloys Ltd. (respondent) entered into contracts for the supply of aluminium rods that contained an arbitration clause but were never signed by the appellant. The appellant opened irrevocable letters of credit and made shipments, but later invoked a force‑majeure clause after R…
NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE MARKETING FEDERATION OF INDIA LTD.versusALIMENTA S.A.
1988 INSC 32626 October 1988Dismissed
The National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India Ltd. entered into two contracts with Swiss firm Alimenta S.A. for groundnut supplies, but a government export ban prevented performance. The first contract contained an arbitration clause, leading Alimenta to invoke arbitration through FOSFA, while the…
SVENSKA HANDELSBM'KEN AND OTHERS ETC.versusINDIAN CHARGE CHROME LTD. AND OTHERS
1994 INSC 2224 January 1994
The plaintiff (borrower) sued the suppliers, lenders and guarantor over a power‑plant project, invoking credit agreements that contained arbitration clauses. The lenders, particularly Svenska Handelsbanken (defendant No. 4), instructed their counsel not to appear or take any step in the main suit, limiting a power of a…
NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE MARKETING FEDERATION OF INDIAversusALIMENTA S.A.
2020 INSC 34522 April 2020Appeal(s) allowed
The National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India (NAFED) entered into a 1979‑80 groundnut export contract with Alimenta S.A. containing an arbitration clause and a contingency provision (Clause 14) that the contract would be cancelled if export was prohibited by the Government. Due to cyclone damage …
OPG POWER GENERATION PRIVATE LIMITEDversusENEXIO POWER COOLING SOLUTIONS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.
2024 INSC 71120 September 2024Dismissed
OPG Power Generation (the appellant) and its holding company Gita Power were sued by Enexio Power Cooling Solutions for unpaid amounts under supply and erection orders for an air‑cooled condenser unit. The arbitral tribunal held that Gita Power, as the holding company, was bound by the arbitration agreement and jointly…
RENUSAGAR POWER CO. LTD. ETC.versusGENERAL ELECTRIC CO. ETC.
1993 INSC 34217 October 1993Dismissed
Renusagar Power Co. entered into a contract with General Electric for the supply of equipment for a power plant, which later gave rise to disputes and an ICC arbitration. The arbitral tribunal awarded US$12,215,622.14, including regular interest, delinquent interest, compensatory damages, and costs. Renusagar challenge…
RENUSAGAR POWER COMPANY LTD.versusGENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY AND ANR.
1984 INSC 14516 August 1984Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined whether a suit filed by Renusagar Power Co. Ltd. seeking a declaration that three claims (unpaid regular interest, delinquent interest, and compensatory damages) were beyond the scope of an arbitration clause could be stayed under Section 3 of the Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) …
ADAVYA PROJECTS PVT. LTD.versusM/S VISHAL STRUCTURALS PVT. LTD. & ORS
2025 INSC 50716 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant and respondent No.1 formed an LLP governed by an agreement containing an arbitration clause (Clause 40). Disputes arose over the ITF project, and the appellant issued a Section 21 notice of arbitration only to respondent No.1 and filed a Section 11 application appointing an arbitrator, also only naming re…
STATE OF ORISSA ETC.versusKLOCKNER AND COMPANY AND ORS. ETC.
1996 INSC 53116 April 1996Dismissed
Klockner & Co., a German firm, had a marketing agreement with Orissa Mining Corporation (OMC) for exclusive marketing of charge chrome, containing an arbitration clause referring disputes to the ICC in London under Swiss law. After OMC's charge‑chrome division was taken over by the State of Orissa under Ordinance 8 of …
OIL & NATURAL GAS COMMISSIONversusWESTERN COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
1987 INSC 1416 January 1987Appeal(s) allowed
The Oil & Natural Gas Commission (ONGC) entered into a drilling contract with Western Company of North America that provided for arbitration under the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 and the law of India, with hearings to be held in London. An umpire, after the arbitrators could not agree, issued an interim award and a fi…
P.E.C. LIMITEDversusAUSTBULK SHIPPING SDN BHD
2018 INSC 105314 November 2018Dismissed
P.E.C. Limited chartered a vessel from Austbulk Shipping and a dispute arose over freight and demurrage. The parties had an arbitration clause in the charter party, and a sole arbitrator awarded US$150,362.18 to Austbulk. P.E.C. filed a petition for enforcement of the foreign award in the Delhi High Court, objecting th…
TRANSOCEAN SHIPPING AGENCY (P) LTD.versusBLACK SEA SHIPPING AND ORS.
1998 INSC 1914 January 1998Dismissed
Transocean Shipping Agency (P) Ltd appealed against a Bombay High Court decree that enforced a foreign arbitral award made in Ukraine in favour of Black Sea Shipping Co. The dispute arose from a 1992 agency agreement containing an arbitration clause referring disputes to the country where the owners were registered. Af…
M/S SHRIRAM EPC LIMITEDversusRIOGLASS SOLAR SA
2018 INSC 81613 September 2018Dismissed
The parties obtained an ICC arbitral award in London ordering RioGlass Solar to pay Shriram EPC Ltd €4.36 million. Shriram filed a petition under Section 47 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to enforce the foreign award in India, while RioGlass contended that the award was unenforceable because it had not b…
BRACE TRANSPORT CORPORATION OF MONROVIA, BERMUDAversusORIENT MIDDLE EAST LINES LTD., SAUDI ARABIA & ORS.
1993 INSC 32912 October 1993Appeal(s) allowed
Brace Transport Corporation of Monrovia sold a vessel to Orient Middle East Lines Ltd. and its nominee under a contract that provided for arbitration in England. An arbitral award granted the appellant a monetary sum, part of which remained unpaid. The vessel was subsequently sold to a third respondent (an Indian gover…
SHIN-ETSU CHEMICAL CO. LTD.versusAKSH OPTIFIBRE LTD. AND ANR.
2005 INSC 36012 August 2005Disposed off
Shin‑Etsu Chemical Co. Ltd. entered into a contract with AKSH Optifibre Ltd. containing an international arbitration clause. After the contract was terminated, the respondent sued for a declaration that the arbitration agreement was void, while the appellant sought a direction under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Con…
DRESSER RAND S.A.versusM/S. BINDAL AGRO CHEM LTD. AND ANR.
2006 INSC 2012 January 2006Dismissed
The Indian company Bindal Agro Chem Ltd. invited bids for equipment and, after negotiations, agreed to modify its General Conditions of Purchase (which contained an arbitration clause) with Dresser Rand SA. The parties exchanged a revised set of conditions on 10 June 1991 and subsequently issued Letters of Intent on 12…
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANYversusRENUSAGAR POWER COMPANY
1987 INSC 20411 August 1987Appeal(s) allowed
General Electric Company (GEC) and Renusagar Power Company entered into a contract for equipment supply, which later gave rise to disputes referred to ICC arbitration. Renusagar filed a suit in the Bombay High Court seeking a declaration that the disputes were not arbitrable, while GEC applied for a stay of the suit un…
R.M. INVESTMENT AND TRADING CO. PVT. LTD.versusBOEING CO. AND ANR.
1994 INSC 6210 February 1994Dismissed
R.M. Investment & Trading Co. (RMI) entered into a consultancy agreement with Boeing to promote sales of aircraft in India and later claimed a commission of US$17.5 million after Boeing sold two aircraft to Air India. The agreement contained an arbitration clause, and Boeing invoked Section 3 of the Foreign Awards (Rec…
M/S. CENTROTRADE MINERALS & METAL INC.versusHINDUSTAN COPPER LTD.
2006 INSC 3109 May 2006Matter referred to larger bench
Centrotrade Minerals & Metal Inc. and Hindustan Copper Ltd. entered into a contract containing a clause that provided for arbitration in India and, if either party was dissatisfied, a second arbitration in London whose award would be binding. The Indian arbitrator issued a NIL award, after which Centrotrade invoked the…
DLF LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS DLF UNIVERSAL LTD) AND ANR.versusKONCAR GENERATORS AND MOTORS LTD.
2024 INSC 5938 August 2024Case Partly allowed
The Supreme Court considered an appeal by DLF Ltd. and another Indian company against a Croatian generator firm concerning the enforcement of a foreign arbitral award expressed in euros. The key issues were the appropriate date for fixing the foreign exchange rate to convert the award into rupees and the treatment of a…
FUERST DAY LAWSON LTD.versusJINDAL EXPORTS LTD.
2011 INSC 4798 July 2011Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined a batch of Special Leave Petitions arising from orders of the Delhi and Calcutta High Courts that refused to enforce foreign arbitral awards or to award interest. The central question was whether an order that is not appealable under section 50 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 co…
SSANGYONG CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD.versusNATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA (NHAI)
2019 INSC 6478 May 2019Appeal(s) allowed
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) awarded a construction contract to Ssangyong Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd., which included a price‑adjustment formula based on the Wholesale Price Index (WPI) old series. When the Ministry of Industrial Development stopped publishing the old series and introduced a …
M/S. N.S. NAYAK AND SONSversusSTATE OF GOA
2003 INSC 2868 May 2003Dismissed
The appellant, N.S. Nayak & Sons, challenged the High Court's dismissal of its appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, arguing that the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 should govern the appeals because the arbitration agreement referred to "the provisions of the Arbitration Act, 1940 or any statut…
M/S ARIF AZIM CO. LTD.versusM/S MICROMAX INFORMATICS FZE
2024 INSC 8507 November 2024Dismissed
M/s Arif Azim Co. Ltd., an Afghan distributor, entered into a 2010 distributorship agreement with M/s Micromax Informatics FZE (UAE) that contained an arbitration clause designating Dubai as the venue and subjecting the arbitration to UAE Arbitration and Conciliation rules. After a credit dispute, the petitioner sought…
THYSSEN STAHLUNION GMBH ETC.versusSTEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD.
1999 INSC 4637 October 1999
The Supreme Court examined three appeals concerning the applicability of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the new Act) versus the Arbitration Act, 1940 (the old Act) and the Foreign Awards Act, 1961. In Thyssen Stahlunion GmbH v. SAIL (CA 6036/98), arbitral proceedings began in 1995 under the old Act and the…
STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.versusBASANT NAHATA
2005 INSC 4067 September 2005Dismissed
The respondent, Basant Nahata, sought registration of a power of attorney, which the Sub‑Registrar refused under a Rajasthan Government notification issued pursuant to Section 22‑A of the Indian Registration Act. The notification declared such documents "opposed to public policy" and barred their registration. The resp…
KOCH NAVIGATION INC.versusHINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPN. LTD.
1989 INSC 2717 September 1989Appeal(s) allowed
Koch Navigation chartered its vessel to Hindustan Petroleum for oil transport. A dispute was referred to a single arbitrator in London, who awarded a principal sum, interest, and ordered the costs of the arbitration reference to be paid by the respondent, to be determined by agreement or, failing that, by taxation. The…
NATIONAL THERMAL POWER CORPORATIONversusSINGER COMPANY AND ORS.
1992 INSC 1517 May 1992Appeal(s) allowed
The National Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC) entered into a contract with Singer Company for equipment supply, stipulating that Indian law would govern the contract and Delhi courts would have exclusive jurisdiction. A dispute was referred to an ICC arbitral tribunal, which chose London as the seat and rendered an int…
BHARAT ALUMINIUM CO.versusKAISER ALUMINIUM TECHNICAL SERVICE, INC.
2012 INSC 3796 September 2012Reference answered
The dispute arose from a contract between Bharat Aluminium Co. and Kaiser Aluminium Technical Service, Inc. that provided for arbitration in London under English law, but governed the contract by Indian law. After two awards were rendered in England, the appellant sought to set aside the awards under Section 34 of the …
SUMITOMO HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.versusONGC LTD. AND ORS.
1997 INSC 7884 December 1997Dismissed
Sumitomo Heavy Industries Ltd entered into a contract with ONGC Ltd for the installation of an oil platform, containing a clause that disputes would be governed by Indian law and arbitrated in London under ICC rules. A dispute led to arbitration, and the appointed umpire issued an award. ONGC filed a petition in the Bo…
M/S. FUERST DAY LAWSON LTD.versusJINDAL EXPORTS LTD.
2001 INSC 2554 May 2001Appeal(s) allowed
Mis. Fuerst Day Lawson Ltd. entered into a supply contract with Jindal Exports Ltd. which gave rise to a dispute arbitrated before the International General Produce Association, resulting in a foreign award dated 13 August 1996. The award was sought to be enforced in Delhi High Court, but the court dismissed the execut…
SHRI LAL MAHAL LTD.versusPROGETIO GRANO SPA
2013 INSC 4233 July 2013Dismissed
Shri Lal Mahal Ltd., the seller, sought to resist enforcement of two foreign appeal awards (Nos. 3782 and 3783) passed by the Board of Appeal of the Grain and Feed Trade Association, London, on the ground that the awards contravened the contract and were contrary to public policy of India. The Delhi High Court had uphe…
PURUSHOTTAM S/O TULSIRAM BADWAIKversusANIL & ORS.
2018 INSC 4462 May 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant and respondents entered into a partnership agreement in 2005 that contained an arbitration clause referring to the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940. The respondents filed a suit seeking injunction, and the appellant moved an application under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (1996 Act) …
ATLAS EXPORT INDUSTRIESversusKOTAK AND COMPANY
1999 INSC 3771 September 1999Dismissed
Atlas Export Industries entered into a contract for the supply of groundnut extractions that incorporated by reference the GAFTA standard contract, which contained an arbitration clause mandating disputes be resolved in London under GAFTA rules. A dispute arose, arbitration was conducted in London and an award was made…