Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Income Tax Act, 1961

1234 judgments · newest first · showing 1001–1200

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS AND ANR.versusMIS DALMIA CEMENT

1995 INSC 462Appeal(s) allowed

Mis Dalmia Cement, a public limited company, filed loss returns for assessment years 1952‑53 to 1954‑55 after the prescribed time. The Income Tax Officer refused to take cognizance of those returns, stating that no assessment could be made. For later years (1955‑56 to 1959‑60) losses were assessed, …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXversusPATEL BROTHERS AND CO. LTD. ETC. ETC.

1995 INSC 347Dismissed

Patel Brothers & Co. Ltd. claimed kitchen expenses for providing ordinary meals to its employees and out‑station customers for the assessment years 1969‑70, 1970‑71 and 1971‑72. The Income‑Tax Officer disallowed the portion relating to customers, classifying it as "entertainment expenditure" under …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JULLUNDURversusAJANTA ELECTRICALS, PUNJAB

1995 INSC 329Dismissed

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Jullundur issued notices under Section 139(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to Ajanta Electricals and its partners, requiring them to file returns within 30 days. The assessees filed their returns and applications for extension of time after the due dates, leading the …

GOSAR FAMILY TRUST, JAMNAGAR ETC.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

1995 INSC 311Dismissed

The Gosar Family Trust was a private discretionary trust with two classes of beneficiaries: the first class could receive the trust's annual income, while the second class would receive the corpus and any accumulated income upon termination. The trustees had absolute discretion to distribute or …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CALCUTIAversusBIJOY KUMAR ALMAL

1995 INSC 247Dismissed

The respondent owned an undivided one‑third share in a house occupied as his own residence along with his brother and other co‑owners. For assessment year 1962‑63 the Assessing Officer deducted the amount prescribed under Section 23(2) of the Income‑Tax Act from the total annual letting value of the …

SUMATI DAYALversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BANGALORE

1995 INSC 221Dismissed

Sumati Dayal, a dealer in art, claimed that large sums received in 1971‑72 and 1972‑73 were race winnings (Rs 3,11,831 and Rs 93,500). The Income‑Tax Officer treated the amounts as income from undisclosed sources under Section 68 of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961. The Settlement Commission, by majority, …

M/S. S.R.F. LIMITEDversusM/S. GARWARE PLASTICS AND POLYESTERS LTD. AND ORS.

1995 INSC 170Appeal(s) allowed

The Board of Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) approved a merger scheme to revive Flowmore Polyester Ltd., a sick company, by merging it with SRF Ltd. Garware Plastics and Polymers Ltd., which had earlier submitted a stand‑alone revival proposal that was rejected, claimed to be an …

MIS HIND WIRE INDUSTRIES LTD.versusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, WEST BENGAL-V

1995 INSC 70Appeal(s) allowed

Mis Hind Wire Industries Ltd. was originally assessed for income tax on 21 September 1979. The assessee obtained a rectification of that order on 12 July 1982 under Section 154 of the Income‑Tax Act. A second rectification application was filed on 4 July 1986, which the Income‑Tax Officer rejected …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXversusCHITTOR ELECTRIC SUPPLY CORPORATION AND ANR.

1995 INSC 30Appeal(s) allowed

The Commissioner of Income‑Tax appealed against a High Court order that had directed the revenue to pay interest under Section 244(1) of the Income‑Tax Act to Chittor Electric Supply Corporation, which had received a refund after a fresh assessment was made in 1973. The original assessment of 1966 …

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusUPENDRA SINGH

1994 INSC 623Appeal(s) allowed

The Union of India filed disciplinary proceedings against IRS officer Upendra Singh alleging that, while handling income‑tax proceedings under sections 133A, 144A and 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, he acted illegally by ignoring incriminating evidence, acquiescing to a reduced disclosure by the …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, HYDERABADversusM/S. P.J. CHEMICALS LTD. ETC.

1994 INSC 391Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether a government cash subsidy, granted as a percentage of an industrial asset's capital cost, could be deducted from the "actual cost" of the asset under Section 43(1) of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961 for the purpose of computing depreciation under Section 32. The Court …

BUILDERS ASSOCIATIONS OF INDIAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1994 INSC 294Dismissed

The Builders Associations of India filed a writ petition under Article 32 challenging the Supreme Court’s earlier decision in Commissioner of Income Tax v. N.C. Budharaja & Co., which held that the word “construction” in Section 32A(2)(b)(iii) of the Income‑Tax Act applies only to movable items such …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUJARAT, AHMEDABADversusSMT. KAMALTNI KHATAU

1994 INSC 198

The Supreme Court examined whether the tax authorities could choose to assess tax on either the trustees or the beneficiaries of a discretionary trust when the trust's income was distributed and actually received by the beneficiaries during the accounting year. The respondent, a beneficiary of six …

BURMAH SHELL OIL STORAGE AND DISTRIBUTING COMPANY OF INDIA LTD. (NOW KNOWN AS BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.)versusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), CALCUTTA

1994 INSC 143Dismissed

The appellant, Burmah Shell Oil Storage and Distribution Co. (now Bharat Petroleum), purchased iron cylinders as returnable packages for LPG distribution, costing Rs 1,09,63,754, and claimed no depreciation. In 1961 it sold the cylinders to the refinery for Rs 82,19,947, incurring a loss of Rs …

C.W.S. (INDIA) LIMITEDversusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

1994 INSC 98Dismissed

The appellants challenged the disallowance of certain expenditures under Sections 40(a)(v) and 40A(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arguing that the ceiling on such expenditures should not apply to assets used by an employee unless the employee also received a benefit under clause (i). The Supreme …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRASversusEXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD.

1994 INSC 5

Express Newspaper Ltd. claimed large losses in its returns for AY 1985-86, which the Assessing Officer rejected as fabricated and assessed a huge income. While the appeal against this assessment was pending, the company filed an application under Section 245‑C of the Income‑Tax Act seeking …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXversusRAM KUMAR AGGARWAL AND BROS.

1993 INSC 354

The assessee, a partnership firm dealing in shares, bought all equity shares of a company in 1945 and treated those shares as stock-in-trade for tax purposes. When the company was liquidated, the liquidator distributed a surplus to the shareholders, and the assessee received Rs. 32,25,550. The …

H.H. SIR RAMA VARMA (DEAD) BY L.RS.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, KERALA

1993 INSC 355Dismissed

The assessee earned long‑term capital gains in the accounting year relevant to AY 1970‑71 and had a carried‑forward long‑term capital loss from earlier years. He claimed a deduction under Section 80T of the Income‑Tax Act on the basis that the deduction should be computed on the gross capital gains …

THE C.L.T., GUJARAT-I, AHMEDABADversusTHE AHMEDABAD COTTON MFG. CO. LTD. & ORS.

1993 INSC 340

The assessee, a cotton textile manufacturer, paid amounts to the Textile Commissioner under Clause 21‑C(1)(b) of the Cotton Textiles (Control) Order, 1948, in lieu of producing the minimum required cloth, and also paid a sum for non‑fulfilment of an export obligation under a bond. The assessee …

SMT. SARIFABIBI MOHMED IBRAHIM AND ORS.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUJARAT

1993 INSC 294Dismissed

The appellants owned a 30,885‑sq‑yd plot registered as agricultural land but located within municipal limits. They obtained permission under Section 63 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act to sell the land for non‑agricultural use and sold it to a housing cooperative in May 1969. The …

SHRIYANS PRASAD JAIN (DEAD) BY LRS.versusINCOME TAX OFFICER AND ORS.

1993 INSC 295

Shriyans Prasad Jain, a former officer of Dalmia Cement & Paper Marketing Co., was paid Rs 7 lakhs on termination of his services and claimed the sum was compensation for loss of employment, exempt under section 7 of the Income‑Tax Act, 1922. The assessment tribunal, High Court and the Supreme Court …

TRIBHOVANDAS BHIMJI ZAVERIversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1993 INSC 289Dismissed

The appellants, a partnership firm, were searched under section 132 of the Income‑Tax Act on 28 October 1975 and cash, jewellery, diamonds and books of account were seized. On 31 December 1975 they filed a declaration of concealed income under section 3(1) of the Voluntary Disclosure of Income and …

VARKEY CHACKOversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

1993 INSC 276Dismissed

Varkey filed his income‑tax return on 16 April 1970. The Income‑Tax Officer (ITO) made an assessment on 27 March 1972, finding concealment of income amounting to less than Rs 25,000 and, on the same day, initiated penalty proceedings and later imposed a Rs 10,000 penalty. The Appellate Assistant …

SABARKANTHA ZILLA KHARID V. SANGH LTDversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

1993 INSC 256Dismissed

Sabarkantha Zilla Kharid Vechan Sangh Ltd., a cooperative society dealing in agricultural implements, seeds, livestock and other articles, claimed exemption from income‑tax on its profits and gains under Section 81(i)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Income‑Tax Officer held that the exemption …

PHOOL CHAND BAJRANG LAL AND ANR.versusINCOME TAX OFFICER AND ANR.

1993 INSC 226Dismissed

The assessee firm claimed a cash loan of Rs 50,000 from a Calcutta company and claimed interest deductions for several years. The Income‑Tax Officer (ITO) in Azamgarh, after receiving a specific letter from the ITO in Calcutta stating that the Calcutta company was merely a name‑lender and had not …

BHARAT BEEDI WORKS (PRIVATE) LIMITED AND ANR.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

1993 INSC 187Appeal(s) allowed

Bharat Beedi Works (P) Ltd., a private limited company, paid annual royalties to a partnership firm for the use of its brand name. The three partners of the firm were also directors of the company. The Income Tax Officer allowed the royalty deductions, but the Commissioner disallowed them under …

M.S.P NADAR SONS, VIRUDHU NAGARversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), MADRAS

1993 INSC 171Dismissed

M.S.P. Nadar Sons, a registered firm, sold shares in several companies during FY 1972‑73, realizing a gross long‑term capital gain of Rs 5,61,508 and a long‑term capital loss of Rs 96,583. The assessee computed assessable capital gains by first applying the standard deduction of Rs 5,000 and the 50% …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRASversusG.R. KARTHIKEYAN, COIMBATORE

1993 INSC 161Appeal(s) allowed

G.R. Karthikeyan, an individual assessee, won Rs 22,000 as prize money in the All India Highway Motor Rally and the Income‑Tax Officer included it in his total income under the definition of "income" in Section 2(24) of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner, the Tribunal and …

MINERAL AND METAL TRADING CORPORATIONversusR. C. MISHRA AND ORS.

1993 INSC 146Appeal(s) allowed

Minerals and Metals Trading Corporation (M.M.T.C.) acted as the intermediary in a private barter scheme through which Ferro Alloys Corporation exported manganese and chrome concentrates. The parties executed contracts whereby title to the goods passed to M.M.T.C., which issued letters of credit, …

CIT, MADRASversusBRAKES INDIA LTD.

1993 INSC 141Dismissed

Brakes India Ltd paid a foreign technical director a total remuneration of Rs 66,000, of which Rs 28,576 were perquisites. The Assessing Officer disallowed the portion of perquisites exceeding one‑fifth of the salary under Section 40(c)(iii) of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961. The Appellate Assistant …

SALEM COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LIMITEDversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS

1993 INSC 142Dismissed

Salem Cooperative Central Bank, a cooperative society engaged in banking, received Rs. 19 as interest on a security deposit with an electricity distribution company. The Income Tax Officer treated the amount as income from other sources and levied an additional surcharge under the Finance Act. The …

JYOTENDRASINHJIversusS.L. TRIPATHI AND ORS.

1993 INSC 138Dismissed

The appellant's father created three U.S. and two U.K. settlement trusts for family members and reported the trusts' income in his Indian tax returns from 1964‑65 to 1969‑70. After his death in 1969, the appellant filed returns for 1970‑71 including the same income and later contended that the …

UNIVERSAL RADIATORS, COIMBATOREversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TAMIL NADU

1993 INSC 125Appeal(s) allowed

Universal Radiators, a manufacturer of automobile radiators, purchased copper ingots from the United States to be rolled in Bombay and used as raw material. While the ingots were at sea, the vessel was seized during hostilities between India and Pakistan and the loss was compensated by the insurer, …

STANDARD TRIUMPH MOTOR CO. LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS

1993 INSC 71Dismissed

Standard Triumph Motor Co. Ltd., a UK non‑resident, entered a 1939 collaboration agreement with an Indian company to receive a 5% royalty on sales. The Indian company credited the royalty in its books each year, but the royalty was only remitted to the UK in sterling. The assessee claimed that, …

EMIL WEBBERversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, V AND M, NAGPUR

1993 INSC 61Dismissed

Ballarpur Paper and Straw Board Mills Ltd. hired foreign personnel, including Emil Webber, to set up a plant in India. Under the contract, the salaries were to be paid free of Indian tax, and Ballarpur paid the tax on Webber’s salary to the tax authorities. The Income Tax Officer treated the tax …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAJ, ORISSAversusDHADI SAHU

1992 INSC 319Appeal(s) allowed

The assessee concealed income of minor children and the Income‑Tax Officer referred the case to the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner (IAC) under Section 274(2) of the Income‑Tax Act because the minimum penalty exceeded Rs 1,000. The reference was made before the amendment of Section 274(2) which, …

C.B. GAUTAMversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1992 INSC 313Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioner C.B. Gautam sought to purchase a lease‑hold plot in Delhi, but the Income Tax authority ordered its compulsory purchase by the Central Government under Section 269UD of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961, without giving any reasons or a chance to be heard. The Supreme Court examined whether …

RAMBAI MANJANATH NAYAK AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1992 INSC 314Dismissed

The appellants, tenants of a three‑storeyed building, continued to occupy the premises after the owner sold it to the respondents. The Central Government, under Chapter XX‑A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, initiated acquisition proceedings, issued notices to the tenants, and eventually ordered …

ESCORTS LIMITED AND ANR. ETC. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1992 INSC 292Dismissed

Escorts Ltd. and other assessees challenged the Finance (No.2) Act, 1980 amendment that gave retrospective effect to clause (iv) of Section 35(2) of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961, arguing it allowed a double deduction for scientific‑research expenditure and violated Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 300A of the …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXversusSUN ENGINEERING WORKS (P) LTD.

1992 INSC 256Dismissed

Sun Engineering Works filed loss returns for assessment years 1960-61 and 1961-62 after the statutory time limit; the Income Tax Officer treated the returns as "no demand" and did not allow the losses. The assessee later disclosed Hundi loans, which the Officer treated as escaped income and, under …

GANGABAI CHARITIESversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX AND ANR.

1992 INSC 183Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether the income of Ganga Bai Charities, a trust that owned a building let out as a marriage hall and operated a printing press, qualified for exemption under Section 11(l)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The trust argued that its income was wholly applied to religious, …

ARVIND MILLS LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUJARAT

1992 INSC 176Dismissed

Arvind Mills Ltd., a textile mill, paid betterment charges under the Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954 as part of a town‑planning scheme and claimed a deduction under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arguing that the payment was a revenue expense. The Income Tax Officer disallowed the deduction; …

C.I.T., BOMBAYversusGWALIOR RAYON SILK MANUFACTURING CO. LTD.

1992 INSC 139Dismissed

The assessee, Gwalior Rayon Silk Manufacturing Co., claimed depreciation on the written‑down value of roads and drains constructed within its factory premises, arguing that they form part of the factory building under Section 32 of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961. The Income‑Tax Officer disallowed the …

M.R. PRATAPversusV.M. MUTHUKRISHNAN, INCOME-TAX OFFICER, CENTRAL - III, MADRAS

1992 INSC 141Dismissed

M.R. Pratap, the Managing Director of Rayala Corporation Private Ltd., signed and verified the company's income‑tax return for AY 1965‑66, which was later found to be false. He was prosecuted under section 277 of the Income‑Tax Act for wilfully making a false verification. The appellant contended …

K.T.M.S. MOHD. AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA

1992 INSC 134Appeal(s) allowed

The Enforcement Directorate seized Rs.4,28,713 in 1966 and recorded statements from appellants K.T.S. Mohammed and M. Jamal Mohammed under Section 39 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA). Both appellants later retracted those statements, claiming they were obtained under duress, and the …

ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUJARATversusI.M. PATEL AND CO.

1992 INSC 136Appeal(s) allowed

The assessee filed income‑tax returns for the assessment years 1964‑65, 1965‑66 and 1966‑67 well after the statutory due dates, resulting in penalties under section 271(1)(a) of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer and the Appellate Assistant Commissioner upheld the penalties, but the …

SHRIMANT PADMARAJE R. KADAMBANDEversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PUNE

1992 INSC 120Appeal(s) allowed

Shrimant Padmaraje R. Kadambande, a descendant of the former ruler of Kolhapur, received a monthly cash allowance that was discontinued after the State of Kolhapur merged with Bombay under the Bombay Merged Territories Miscellaneous Alienations Abolition Act, 1955. The Act abolished such …

Y.P. CHAWLA AND ORSversusM.P. TIWARI AND ANR.

1992 INSC 101Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents, Tiwari and Passi, were prosecuted under Section 276‑B of the Income‑Tax Act for failing to deposit TDS. They applied to the Commissioner for compounding of the offences under Section 279(2). The Central Board of Direct Taxes had issued Instruction No. 1317 under Section 119(1) …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUCKNOWversusONKAR SARAN AND SONS

1992 INSC 75Dismissed

The Hindu Undivided Family Onkar Saran & Sons filed returns for assessment years 1961-62 and 1962-63 that omitted capital gains from land sales. The Income‑Tax Officer, after discovering the omission, issued notices under s.148 in 1965 and the assessee filed revised returns in 1969, still concealing …

DAGI RAM PINDI LAL AND ANRversusTRILOK CHAND JAIN AND ORS.

1992 INSC 37Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff sought recovery of a sum and, during trial, obtained court summons for the Income Tax Department to produce assessment records of the defendants for years 1964-65 to 1971-72. The Department produced the records in sealed covers, claiming privilege under the then‑applicable Section 137 …

CONTINENTAL CONSTRUCTION LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL-I

1992 INSC 7Dismissed

Continental Construction Ltd., a civil engineering firm, entered into several overseas construction contracts, notably the Karkh Water Supply project in Iraq, and sought deductions under Section 80‑0 of the Income‑Tax Act for payments received as royalties, fees or similar. The Central Board of …

INDIAN TUBE CO. (P) LTDversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CALCUTTA

1992 INSC 5Dismissed

Indian Tube Co. transferred Rs 90 lakh to a dividend reserve in 1963, of which Rs 76 lakh was paid out as dividend and Rs 14 lakh remained. The issue was whether the transferred amount, or any part of it, should be treated as a reserve for computing the company's capital under the Companies …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, GUJARATversusARVIND MILLS LTD.

1991 INSC 332Appeal(s) allowed

Arvind Mills Ltd. imported plant and machinery from abroad and financed the purchase with a foreign loan. After the 1966 devaluation of the rupee, the rupee liability on the loan increased. The assessee claimed a development rebate under Section 33 of the Income‑Tax Act on the revised (higher) cost …

RADHASOAMI SATSANG, SAOMI BAGH,AGRAversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

1991 INSC 297Appeal(s) allowed

The Radhasoami Satsang, a religious institution, had its income assessed as taxable for several years after an earlier period of exemption, prompting the assessee to challenge the assessments before the Income‑Tax Tribunal, which held that the income was exempt under sections 11 and 12 of the …

NAVNIT LAL SAKAR LALversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

1991 INSC 276Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Navnitlal Sakarlal was bequeathed half of his grandfather's estate under a 1956 will that named no executor. The deceased's son, Sakarlal Balabhai, acted as legal representative and filed tax returns for the estate, being assessed on the estate's income until 1967-68. The Income Tax …

MAHADEO PRASAD BAIS (DEAD}versusINCOME-TAX OFFICER 'A' WARD, GORAKHPUR AND ATJR.

1991 INSC 230Dismissed

Mahadeo Prasad Bais, as Karta of a Hindu Undivided Family, was assessed as a HUF up to AY 1948‑49 and thereafter filed individual returns claiming total or partial partition. The Tribunal and the High Court later accepted a partial partition, making certain family income assessable to him …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUJARATversusCELLULOSE PRODUCTS OF INDIA LTD.

1991 INSC 220Appeal(s) allowed

Cellulose Products of India Ltd, a chemical manufacturer, claimed exemption under Section 84 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 1966-67, arguing that its new industrial undertaking began producing "articles" only when it started manufacturing Carboxy Methyl Cellulose (CMC) in June 1961. …

CENTRAL PROVINCES MANGANESE ORE. CO. LTD.versusI.T.O., NAGPUR

1991 INSC 197Dismissed

The appellant, a non‑resident company exporting manganese ore, was assessed for the assessment year 1953‑54. Customs authorities later found that the company had under‑invoiced its exports, resulting in a finding of under‑invoicing of about Rs 44‑45 lakh. On this basis, the Income‑Tax Officer issued …

VANIA SILK MILLS (P) LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, AHMEDABAD

1991 INSC 194Appeal(s) allowed

Vania Silk Mills Ltd. purchased machinery in 1957 and hired it to Jasmine Mills, which insured the machinery. A fire in 1966 destroyed the machinery; the insurer paid the lendee, which in turn paid the appellant Rs 6,32,533 as insurance claim. The assessee treated the excess of the claim over the …

ATTAR SINGH GURMUKH SINGHversusINCOME TAX OFFICER, LUDHIANA ETC.

1991 INSC 176Dismissed

The assessees, Attar Singh and Gurmukh Singh, made cash payments exceeding Rs.10,000 for purchases of stock-in-trade, which the assessing authority disallowed as deductions under Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 read with Rule 6DD of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. The assessees challenged the …

VIJAYA LAXMI SUGAR MILLS LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KANPUR

1991 INSC 171Dismissed

The appellant, a company in liquidation, sold its assets and invested the proceeds in fixed deposits, earning interest income. The liquidator incurred various expenses (salaries, legal fees, etc.) which the company sought to deduct from the interest under section 57(iii) of the Income Tax Act. The …

MOTILAL CHHADAMI LAL JAINversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI ETC.

1991 INSC 95Appeal(s) allowed

The Hindu Undivided Family (M.C. Jain) leased its premises to Jain Glass Works Ltd for an annual rent of Rs 21,000, of which Rs 10,000 was contractually payable directly to a college run by a charitable trust. The Court held that this arrangement is merely a self‑imposed application of income and …

BURN STANDARD COMPANY LIMITEDversusMCDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL INC. AND ANOTHER

1991 INSC 87Dismissed

Burn Standard Company Ltd., a Government undertaking, entered into a technical collaboration agreement with McDermott International Inc. to obtain foreign technical know‑how, requiring RBI permission under Section 28(1)(b) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (FERA). The agreement received …

GARDEN SILK WEAVING FACTORY, SURATversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUJARAT, AHMEDABAD

1991 INSC 81Appeal(s) allowed

Garden Silk Weaving Factory, a registered partnership firm, challenged the Income‑Tax Officer’s addition of Rs 5,08,423 (unabsorbed depreciation and unabsorbed business loss) to its total income for AY 1968‑69. The firm argued that unabsorbed depreciation should be carried forward by the firm, while …

A.L.A. FIRMversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS

1991 INSC 59Dismissed

The appellant, A.L.A. Firm, a partnership engaged in money‑lending and property transactions, was dissolved on 13 March 1961 and reported a revaluation surplus of $1,01,248 (Rs.1,58,057) in its 1961‑62 return, treating it as neither revenue nor capital. The Income‑Tax Officer initially accepted this …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, WEST BENGALversusWESMAN ENGG. CO. (P.) LTD.

1991 INSC 13Dismissed

Wesman Engineering Co. (P) Ltd., a licensee, sought a certificate under s.195(2) of the Income Tax Act to remit payments to its foreign collaborators for royalties and cost of working drawings. The Income Tax Officer held the entire remittance taxable and directed 65% TDS. The assessee appealed, …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CALCUTTAversusBRITISH PAINTS INDIA LTD

1990 INSC 386Appeal(s) allowed

British Paints India Ltd. valued its stock‑in‑trade at the cost of raw materials only, excluding overheads, claiming that paints have a short shelf‑life. The Assessing Officer added the overheads to the stock value under section 145 of the Income‑Tax Act, increasing tax for 1963‑64 and allowing a …

MAHABIR COLD STORAGEversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PATNA

1990 INSC 382Dismissed

Mahabir Cold Storage, a partnership firm newly constituted after the original firm Prayagchand & Hanumanmal took on Periwal & Co. as a partner, claimed a development rebate for machinery installed by the original firm in 1959‑60. The claim was made in the 1962‑63 assessment year. The issue was …

INCOME TAX OFFICER, CUTTACK AND ORS.versusBIJU PATNAIK

1990 INSC 383Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, Biju Patnaik, was assessed for the year 1957-58 but allegedly failed to disclose a Rs.15 lakh capital gain from the sale of his mining business. The Income Tax Officer, after obtaining approval, issued a notice under sections 147(a) and 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to reopen the …

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.versusU.P. STATE WARE HOUSING CORPORATION

1990 INSC 334Dismissed

The Union of India, as the revenue authority, demanded advance tax from the U.P. State Ware Housing Corporation for the assessment year 1974-75, contending that the corporation's rental income from its godowns and warehouses was not exempt under Section 10(29) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The …

BIKANER GYPSUMS LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RAJASTHAN

1990 INSC 319Appeal(s) allowed

Bikaner Gypsums Ltd., a mining company, held a lease for gypsum extraction but the railway had encroached on the leased land, obstructing mining. The parties negotiated a cost‑sharing arrangement for shifting the railway, and the company paid Rs 3 lakh of the total Rs 12 lakh expense. The company …

POONJABHAI VARMALIDASversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AHMEDABAD

1990 INSC 311Dismissed

The assessee, Poonjabhai Varmalidas, had written off certain debts as bad under Section 10(2)(xi) of the Income Tax Act, 1922 in 1959‑60. His business ceased before the amounts were later recovered in the assessment years 1964‑65, 1965‑66 and 1967‑68, after the 1961 Act had repealed the 1922 Act. …

INCOME TAX OFFICER, CALICUTversusSMT. N.K. SARADA THAMPATTY

1990 INSC 280Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a member of a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF), claimed that a partition agreement dated 3 July 1958 and a subsequent civil court decree had dissolved the HUF, so that the family could not be taxed as a HUF for assessment years 1967-68, 1968-69 and 1969-70. The Income Tax Officer …

SARASWATI INDUSTRIAL SYNDICATE LTD.versusC.I.T., HARYANA, HIMACHAL PRADESH, DELHI

1990 INSC 266Appeal(s) allowed

Saraswati Industrial Syndicate Ltd. (the appellant) claimed exemption from tax on Rs.58,735, a trading liability that had been allowed to the Indian Sugar Company before it was amalgamated into Saraswati in 1962. The Income Tax Officer and the Appellate Assistant Commissioner disallowed the claim, …

JUTE CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR.

1990 INSC 267Disposed off

The Jute Corporation of India Ltd. was assessed for income tax for AY 1974-75 and later claimed a deduction of Rs.11,54,995 for its liability to Purchase Tax, an issue not raised before the Income Tax Officer. While hearing its appeal before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, the corporation was …

U.P. STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATIONversusMUNIRUDDIN

1990 INSC 234Disposed off

The respondent, a bus conductor of the U.P. State Road Transport Corporation, was dismissed for allegedly erasing way‑bills and reselling tickets. He contended that carbon copies of crucial documents were withheld during the disciplinary enquiry, causing prejudice. The trial court and first …

NORTHERN CORPORATIONversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1990 INSC 221Disposed off

Northern Corporation imported MSCR defective sheets in 1984 and stored them in a customs warehouse. The Income Tax Department imposed a ban under Section 132(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, preventing the goods from being cleared. After the ban was lifted in 1988, customs demanded payment of duty at …

SHASHIKANT LAXMAN KALE AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

1990 INSC 208Dismissed

The petitioners, an employee of a private‑sector firm and a trade union, challenged the constitutional validity of clause 10‑C inserted by the Finance Act, 1987 into section 10 of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961, which grants tax exemption on voluntary‑retirement payments only to employees of public‑sector …

SMT. KUSUM LATA SINGHALversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX RAJASTHAN, JAIPUR AND ORS.

1990 INSC 204Dismissed

Smt. Kusum Lata Singhal, a tobacco stockist, challenged the seizure of her books and jewellery after a search under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act was deemed unauthorized. Her husband, R.K. Singhal, was simultaneously prosecuted under Section 132(5) and claimed the jewellery belonged to him as …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRASversusK.R. SADAYAPPAN

1990 INSC 195Appeal(s) allowed

K.R. Sadayappan, a film distributor, purchased a plot of land in his son's name for a total consideration of Rs.1,40,000, but his wealth statement omitted this investment and his return showed only Rs.80,000. The Income Tax Officer treated the unaccounted Rs.18,750 as undisclosed income and imposed …

SMT. SHANTI DEVI L. SINGH AND ANR.versusTAX RECOVERY OFFICER AND ORS.

1990 INSC 152Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners purchased immovable property at auction sales conducted by the Tax Recovery Officer (TRO) for recovery of income‑tax and were issued certificates of sale. They approached the Sub‑Registrar to register the certificates, but the Sub‑Registrar and the Collector of Stamps refused unless …

M.B. ABDULLAversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, KERALA

1990 INSC 93Dismissed

The petitioner was caught with contraband gold worth Rs 20 lakhs, which was confiscated by customs. The assessing officer added the value of the gold to the petitioner’s income under Section 69‑A of the Income‑Tax Act, treating it as income from an undisclosed source. The Appellate Assistant …

HUNDRAJ KANYALAL SAJNANI ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1990 INSC 88Dismissed

The petitioners, Group‑A Income‑Tax officers promoted from Group‑B, challenged the 1973 Seniority Rules and the accompanying seniority list, alleging that the rules were based on a mistaken finding that promotions exceeded the statutory quota and that the classification of officers into Group‑A and …

KESHAVJI RAVJI & CO. ETC. ETC.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

1990 INSC 26Appeal(s) allowed

The partnership firm Keshavji Ravji & Co. paid interest to its partners on their capital credits and also received interest from the same partners on borrowings during the assessment year 1975-76. The Assessing Officer disallowed the interest paid to partners without setting off the interest …

DEVI CINE PROJECTOR MANUFACTURING CO., ETC. ETC.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

1990 INSC 27Appeal(s) allowed

Devi Cinema and other firms challenged the disallowance of interest paid to their partners under Section 40(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal had held that the entire interest paid by the firm to a partner was disallowable, ignoring any interest the partner paid back …

ELEL HOTELS AND INVESTMENTS LIMITED AND ANR. ETC. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA

1989 INSC 164Dismissed

Elel Hotels and Investments Ltd. and other hoteliers challenged the Hotel Receipts Tax Act, 1980, which imposed a 15% tax on the gross receipts of hotels whose room charges were Rs.75 or more per day per individual. The petitioners argued that the Act was beyond Union legislative competence, falling …

ELECTRONICS CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR.

1989 INSC 168Directions issued

Electronics Corporation of India Ltd entered into an agreement with a Norwegian firm for technical services and sought a No Objection Certificate under s.195(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to remit payments without tax deduction. The Commissioner rejected the application, holding that s.9(1)(vii) …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, LUCKNOWversusBAZPUR CO-OPERATIVE SUGAR FACTORY LTD.

1989 INSC 160Appeal(s) allowed

The Bazpur Co-operative Sugar Factory Ltd., a cooperative society, required its producer‑shareholders to deposit amounts into a 'Loss Equalisation & Capital Redemption Reserve Fund' under a bye‑law. The deposits were used for the society’s business, including converting partly paid shares to fully …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AMRITSARversusSTRAW BOARD MANUFACTURING CO. LTD.

1989 INSC 149Dismissed

The Straw Board Manufacturing Co. claimed concessional tax rates, a development rebate under section 33 and a deduction under section 80‑E of the Income Tax Act for the assessment years 1965‑66 to 1967‑68, asserting that strawboard manufacturing is a priority industry listed in the schedules. The …

VIBHUTI GLASS WORKSversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUCKNOW

1989 INSC 151Dismissed

Vibhuti Glass Works, a public limited company, mortgaged its glass factory and obtained a loan from the Industrial Finance Corporation on the condition that the Uttar Pradesh Government manage the factory for 20 years and receive a share of profits if they exceeded a prescribed limit. During the …

CLAGGETT BRACHI CO. LTD., LONDONversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, A.P.

1989 INSC 142Dismissed

Claggett Branch Ltd., a non‑resident company dealing in tobacco, had its income for assessment years 1959‑60 and 1960‑61 originally assessed on the basis of returns filed by its Indian agents under s.23(3) of the Income‑Tax Act, 1922. While assessing the later year 1962‑63 the Income‑Tax Officer …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CALCUTTAversusPRAHALADRAI AGARWALA

1989 INSC 143Dismissed

The assessee, a partner in a firm, gifted Rs.51,000 to his wife who then contributed the amount as capital to a newly formed partnership and became a partner. The Income Tax Officer included the wife’s share of the partnership profit in the assessee’s total income under section 64(1)(iii) of the …

ALEMBIC CHEMICAL WORKS CO. LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUJARAT

1989 INSC 118Appeal(s) allowed

Alembic Chemical Works Ltd., a penicillin manufacturer, paid Rs 2,39,625 to Japanese firm Meiji for sub‑cultures, technical know‑how, designs and training to improve yields in its existing plant. The assessee claimed the payment as a revenue expense deductible under Section 37 of the Income‑Tax Act, …

SHUBHLAXMI MILLS LIMITEDversusADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, GUJARAT

1989 INSC 102Dismissed

Shubhlaxmi Mills Ltd., a textile mill, claimed a development rebate of Rs.1,26,233 for AY 1962-63 under s.33 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Income‑Tax Officer rejected the claim because the company had not created a reserve fund as required by s.34(3)(a). The claim was upheld by the Appellate …

MRS. ARUNDHATI BALKRISHNAversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

1989 INSC 74Dismissed

Mrs. Arundhati Balkrishna, a beneficiary of the Shrimati Arundhati Balkrishna Trust, claimed deductions for interest paid by the trust on amounts withdrawn from an estate account. The Income Tax Officer disallowed part of the interest, holding that some withdrawals were for personal expenses. The …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CALCUTTAversusKARAM CHAND THAPAR & BROS. (P) LTD.

1989 INSC 55Dismissed

The assessee, K.C. Thapar & Bros. (P) Ltd., claimed deductions for losses incurred on the sale of shares of Bharat Starch & Chemicals Ltd. and Greaves Cotton & Co. Ltd. for AY 1959-60, which the Income‑Tax Officer disallowed on the ground that the transactions were at undervalued prices and were …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUCKNOWversusU.P. COOPERATIVE FEDERATION LTD.

1989 INSC 51Disposed off

The U.P. Cooperative Federation Ltd., an apex cooperative society, received interest of Rs.9,000 on a cash security of Rs.2 lakh furnished to a cooperative sugar factory under an agency agreement, and interest of Rs.51,295 on loans advanced to its member societies for sugar distribution. The Revenue …

A.R. KRISHNAMURTHY & ANRversusC.L.T. MADRAS

1989 INSC 50Dismissed

The appellants, a body of individuals, bought two parcels of land in 1966 and in 1970 granted a ten‑year mining lease to an allied private company for a premium of Rs.5 lakh. The Income‑Tax Officer treated the lease‑hold interest as a transfer of a capital asset and levied long‑term capital gains on …

INCOME TAX OFFICER, AZAMGARH & ANR.versusMEWALAL DWARKA PRASAD & VICE VERSA

1989 INSC 52Disposed off

The Income‑Tax Officer issued a notice under section 148 of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961, alleging that three cash‑credit entries totalling Rs 1 lakh had escaped assessment for the year 1965‑66. The assessee challenged the notice, arguing that it was issued more than seven years after the original …

DR. BALIRAM WAMAN HIRAYversusJUSTICE B. LENTIN AND OTHERS

1988 INSC 272Case Allowed

The State of Maharashtra appointed Justice B. Lentin as a one‑man Commission of Inquiry to investigate the death of 14 patients at J.J. Hospital. The Commission found the appellant, Dr. Baliram Waman Hiray, gave contradictory evidence and issued a show‑cause notice for perjury under s.193 IPC read …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAYversusITALINDIA COTTON CO. (P) LTD.

1988 INSC 262Dismissed

The assessee, Italindia Cotton Co. Ltd., incurred a loss in the assessment year 1960‑61 and sought to set off that loss against income in the assessment year 1963‑64. A change in shareholding occurred in 1963, and the Income‑Tax Officer denied the set‑off under Section 79 of the Income‑Tax Act, …

SURINDER NATH KAPOORversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

1988 INSC 202Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined a garnishee order issued under section 226(3)(x) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which sought payment of Rs.8,56,377.55 despite the notice specifying only Rs.2,86,450. The Court held that because the amount in the order was not mentioned in the notice, the garnishee order was …

TATA TEA LTD. & ANR. ETC.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. ETC.

1988 INSC 144Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined writ petitions filed by Tata Tea Ltd. and other tea companies challenging amendments made by the West Bengal and Kerala legislatures that sought to tax the entire income from the sale of tea grown and manufactured by the assessees. The petitioners argued that only 60% of …

CHUHARMAL S/0 TAKARMAL MOHNANIversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, M.P., BHOPAL

1988 INSC 126Dismissed

The petitioner, Chuharmal, filed an income‑tax return for AY 1974‑75 showing a total income of Rs 3,113. During a customs search in May 1973, 565 foreign watches valued at Rs 87,455 were seized from his bedroom. The Income‑Tax Officer issued notices under s.69A of the Income Tax Act to treat the …

CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES AND 0THERSversusADITYA V. BIRLA

1987 INSC 351Dismissed

Aditya V. Birla, a technician, entered into a three‑year agreement with Thai Rayon Company to provide services in Bangkok and sought approval from the Indian Government to claim a deduction under Section 80RRA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Government refused, contending that the provision applied …

SIR SHADI LAL AND SONS, SHAMLIversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, KANPUR

1987 INSC 352Dismissed

Sir Shadi Lal and Sons, a Hindu undivided family, leased a house and the lease required the tenant to keep the premises in good repair, while the lessor would handle major structural repairs. The Assessing Officer initially allowed a deduction for repairs under s.24(1)(i)(a) of the Income Tax Act, …

WAZID ALI ABID ALI, ETC.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUCKNOW, ETC.

1987 INSC 323Case Partly allowed

The case concerned two registered partnership firms in which a partner died during the previous year. In the first firm, the partnership deed expressly provided that the firm would not dissolve on a partner's death, and the deceased partner's son was admitted as a new partner without executing a …

GANESH DASS SREERAM, ETC.versusINCOME TAX OFFICER, 'A' WARD, SHILLONG AND OTHERS ETC.

1987 INSC 302Disposed off

The appellants, registered firms, filed income‑tax returns after the prescribed time but within the four‑year period allowed under sub‑section (4) of section 139 of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer, invoking that provision and the proviso to sub‑section (1), levied interest on the tax …

C.I.T. GUJARATversusELECON ENGINEERING CO. LTD.

1987 INSC 178Dismissed

Elecon Engineering Co. Ltd., a public limited company, claimed a rebate under Section 84 of the Income‑Tax Act for the assessment year 1964‑65, the second year of its new industrial project. The Assessing Officer initially allowed a rebate of Rs 2,72,372 but on reassessment reduced it to Rs …

R.K.UPADHYAYAversusSHANABHAI P. PATEL

1987 INSC 137Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent challenged a notice of reassessment issued under section 147(b) of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1965‑66, arguing that the notice was barred by the statutory limitation. The Gujarat High Court quashed the notice, relying on the earlier Banarsi Debi decision which …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, KANPURversusBEHARI LAL RAM CHARAN LTD.

1987 INSC 126Dismissed

The Commissioner of Income‑Tax appealed against the Allahabad High Court’s decision in favour of Behari Lal Ram Charan Ltd, which allowed the company to set off a capital loss of Rs 3,17,500 incurred in assessment year (AY) 1957‑58 against capital gains of Rs 3,10,200 in AY 1965‑66. The Revenue …

SMT. PADMAVATI JAIKRISHNAversusADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUJARAT AHMEDABAD

1987 INSC 123Dismissed

Smt. Padmavati Jaikrishna, an individual assessee, claimed a deduction of Rs.10,275 under section 57(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for interest paid on loans taken to meet personal obligations such as income‑tax, wealth‑tax and a statutory annuity deposit. The Income Tax Officer held that only a …

INCOME-TAX OFFICER, CALCUTTA & ORS.versusRADHESHYAM LADIA

1987 INSC 121Dismissed

The respondent, Radheshyam, was assessed for the years 1960-61, 1961-62 and 1962-63 and was served notices under sections 147(a) and 148 of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961. The Income‑Tax Officer alleged that his wife had received valuable assets from him without adequate consideration and that the income …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, U.P.versusSHAH SADIQ AND SONS.

1987 INSC 108Dismissed

Shah Sadiq & Sons, a partnership firm registered under the Income Tax Act, incurred speculation losses of Rs 60,054 in AY 1960‑61 and Rs 6,839 in AY 1961‑62 and claimed to set them off against a profit of Rs 58,102 in AY 1962‑63. The Income‑Tax Officer rejected the claim, holding that, for a …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CALCUTTAversusT.I. & M. SALES LTD.

1987 INSC 101Dismissed

The assessee, T.I. & M. Sales Ltd., was assessed as a representative assessee for ten non‑resident companies and the Revenue claimed a "business connection" under Section 9 of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961, making the Indian company an agent under Section 163(1)(b). The assessee contended that no such …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXversusMUSSADILAL RAM BHAROSE

1987 INSC 24Dismissed

The assessee, a liquor‑vendor firm, filed its return of income based on its own books, which the Income‑Tax Officer rejected and recomputed using an 8% net‑profit rate, resulting in a total income that was less than 80% of the correct income. A penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income‑Tax Act …

YUDHISHTERversusASHOK KUMAR

1986 INSC 265Dismissed

The appellant, Yudhishter, had been in possession of a residential premises since 1962. The respondent landlord, Ashok Kumar, purchased the premises in 1971 and later filed an eviction petition in 1974 under the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, claiming a bona‑fide requirement …

KALYAN MILLS LTD.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

1986 INSC 249Dismissed

The Union of India sought to recover tax arrears owed by an assessee company and was informed that the amount could be recovered from a debt the appellant, Kalyan Mills Ltd., owed to the assessee. Notices under Sections 46(2) and 46(5A) of the Income Tax Act were issued to the appellant, and the …

C.I.T., ANDHRA PRADESHversusTRUSTEES OF H.E.H., THE NIZAM'S FAMILY TRUST

1986 INSC 208Dismissed

The Nizam of Hyderabad created a family trust in 1950, dividing the corpus into a Reserve Fund and a Family Trust Expenses Account, each with distinct purposes. The income of these two funds was assessed separately for 1960‑61 and 1961‑62, but the Income‑Tax Officer later reopened the assessments …

O.P. BHANDARIversusINDIAN TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.& ORS.

1986 INSC 202Appeal(s) allowed

O.P. Bhandari, a manager of a hotel under the Indian Tourism Development Corporation (ITDC), was terminated by a notice‑pay order under Rule 31(v) of the ITDC Conduct, Discipline and Appeal Rules, 1978. He challenged the constitutional validity of the rule, arguing that termination by mere notice or …

HINDUSTAN WIRES PRODUCTS LIMITEDversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, PATIALA

1986 INSC 162Dismissed

Hindustan Wires Products Ltd., a manufacturer of insulated copper wires, claimed that its winding wires qualified as "cables" under item 7 of the Fifth/Sixth Schedule of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and therefore entitled it to development rebate and priority‑industry deductions under sections 33 and …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KANPURversusSARAN ENGINEERING CO. LTD.

1986 INSC 154Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether various reserves created by Saran Engineering Co. Ltd. could be treated as "standard deductions" under the Super Profits Tax Act, 1963, and thus be included in the computation of capital for the Companies (Profit) Surtax Act, 1964. The reserves in question included …

PATNAIK & CO. LTD.versusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ORISSA

1986 INSC 137Appeal(s) allowed

Patnaik & Co., an automobile dealer, claimed a loss of Rs.53,650 on the sale of its subscription to the Orissa Government Loan 1972, arguing it was a revenue loss deductible against future profits. The Income Tax Officer treated it as a capital loss, but the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held it was …

MADNANI DEVELOPMENT CORPN. (P) LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, ORISSA

1986 INSC 139Dismissed

Madnani Development Corp., a contractor, bought two parcels of land to obtain earth for a railway construction contract and later sold the land at a loss of Rs.45,241. The company treated the loss as a revenue expense (cost of earth) and claimed a deduction of Rs.30,045 for the assessment year …

ANCHOR PRESSINGS (P) LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, U.P. & ORS.

1986 INSC 140Dismissed

Anchor Pressings Ltd. was assessed to income‑tax for AY 1963‑64 without claiming the rebate under s.84 of the Income‑Tax Act. After the assessment, the company applied under s.154 for rectification of the order to obtain the s.84 relief, but the Income‑Tax Officer and the Commissioner rejected the …

COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, KANPUR ETC. ETC.versusCHANDER SEN ETC.

1986 INSC 143Dismissed

Rangi Lal and his son Chander Sen formed a Hindu undivided family (HUF) that later underwent a partial partition, after which Rangi Lal died leaving a credit balance in the firm’s books. Chander Sen, who had his own HUF with his sons, claimed that the balance and its interest were his individual …

C.I.T (CENTRAL), MADRASversusCANARA WORKSHOPS (P) LTD., KODIALBALL, MANGALORE

1986 INSC 131Dismissed

Canara Workshops Ltd., a company engaged in automobile ancillaries, also commenced an alloy‑steel manufacturing unit, both of which are listed as priority industries under the Fifth Schedule of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The company claimed an 8% deduction under section 80E (then s. SOE) on the …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CALCUTTAversusBIJU PATNAIK

1986 INSC 120Appeal(s) allowed

The assessee, Biju Patnaik, claimed deductions for interest on loans from the Kalinga Foundation Trust and dividends from shares of Kalinga Tubes Ltd. The Income‑Tax Officer treated the cash credits and dividends as income from undisclosed sources, concluding that the trust was a camouflage for the …

INDIAN OIL CORPORATIONversusINCOME TAX OFFICER, CENTRAL CIRCLE V, CALCUTTA & ORS.

1986 INSC 115Appeal(s) allowed

The Indian Oil Corporation, a UK‑incorporated company with its principal place of business in India, claimed large deductions for London management expenses incurred by its parent company, Burmah Oil Co. Ltd., in its income‑tax returns for the years 1957‑58 to 1959‑60. The Assessing Officer, relying …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX, BOMBAYversusVANAZ ENGINEERING (P) LTD., BOMBAY

1986 INSC 104Appeal(s) allowed

Vanaz Engineering (P) Ltd. introduced a gratuity scheme in mid‑1970 and, based on an actuarial report, provisioned Rs 2,11,305 as a liability as of 31 December 1970. The Income‑Tax Officer allowed only Rs 27,249, the difference between the provision and the liability for 1969, but the Appellate …

K. GEORGE THOMASversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME- TAX, KERALA

1986 INSC 99Dismissed

K. George Thomas, an individual who owned a printing press and a daily newspaper, received Rs.5,85,637 from the United States in his capacity as Vice‑President of the India Gospel Mission. The funds were credited to a bank account in the name of the Mission but were largely used for the newspaper’s …

NATIONAL TEXTILE CORPORATION LTD. & ORS.versusSITARAM MILLS LTD. & ORS. ETC.

1986 INSC 61Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether the surplus lands owned by Shree Sitaram Mills formed part of the "assets in relation to the textile undertaking" under sub‑section (2) of section 3 of the Textile Undertakings (Taking Over of Management) Act, 1983. The mill, a sick textile undertaking, had been …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX U.P, LUCKNOWversusJ.K. HOSIERY FACTORY, KANPUR

1986 INSC 48Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether an unregistered partnership firm that became a registered firm could carry forward unabsorbed depreciation from the year it was unregistered (1949-50) and set it off against the partners' income in the subsequent year (1950-51). The Tribunal had denied the set‑off, …

NIRANJAN & CO. P. LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, WEST BENGAL-I & OTHERS

1986 INSC 49Dismissed

Niranjan & Co. Ltd. filed its 1962 return showing a profit of Rs 2,092 but later discovered that profit from construction work of Rs 10,718.46 had been omitted. The Income‑Tax Officer (ITO) assessed the year‑end tax on 27 Nov 1963, having taken the construction profit into account from the …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, ORISSAversusORISSA CORPORATION (P) LTD.

1986 INSC 50Dismissed

The assessee, Orissa Corporation, claimed a cash credit of Rs 1,50,000 as loans from three individuals, producing confirmation letters and hundis but could not serve notices under s.131 to the alleged lenders. The Income‑Tax Officer deemed the lenders “name‑lenders”, added the amount as unproved …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXversusSHIVAKAMI CO. PVT. LTD.

1986 INSC 44Dismissed

Shivakami Co. Pvt. Ltd., a private company, sold unquoted shares of two other companies and claimed a loss. The Income‑Tax Officer, relying on the first proviso to section 12B(2) of the 1922 Income‑Tax Act (now section 52 of the 1961 Act), deemed the break‑up values of the shares and assessed …

ASHOK KUMAR MITTALversusMARUTI UDYOG LTD, & ANR.

1986 INSC 30Disposed off

The petitioner, Ashok Kumar Mittal, applied for an allotment of a Maruti 800 car but due to a computer error his application was recorded for a Maruti truck; the company agreed to consider his case under the manufacturer's discretionary 5% quota. In the course of correspondence, Maruti Udyog …

S.P. GRAMOPHONE COMPANYversusC.I.T PATIALA

1986 INSC 9Dismissed

The appellant, S.P. Gramophone Co., sought registration of its partnership under Section 26A of the Income Tax Act, 1922 for AY 1961‑62 after a fresh partnership deed added four new partners to the original two, who were disabled. The Income Tax Officer rejected the application, alleging that the …

STATE BANK OF TRAVANCOREversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KERALA

1986 INSC 3Dismissed

The State Bank of Travancore, a subsidiary of SBI, maintained its books on a mercantile basis and charged interest on advances it deemed "sticky" (highly doubtful of recovery) by debiting borrowers but crediting the amounts to an "Interest Suspense Account" instead of its profit‑and‑loss account. It …

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHIversusBANSI DHAR & SONS

1985 INSC 252Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) that received Rs.2,49,874 as insurance proceeds after the death of the Karta's father. The income from this amount was initially taxed in the Karta's personal assessment, but the Income Tax Officer later treated it as HUF income, leading to …

MAYA RANI PUNJversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI,

1985 INSC 248

Maya Rani, the assessee for assessment year 1961-62, failed to file her income‑tax return by the due date of 28 September 1961 and eventually filed it on 3 May 1962, after the Income Tax Act, 1961 had come into force on 1 April 1962. The Income Tax Officer imposed a penalty of Rs 4,060 under section …

SCIENTIFIC ENGLNEERING HOUSE (P) LTD.versusCOMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ANDHRA PRADESH

1985 INSC 235Appeal(s) allowed

Scientific Engineering House (P) Ltd. entered into two 1961 collaboration agreements with Metrimpex Hungarian Trading Company to obtain technical know‑how for manufacturing microscopes and theodolites. The foreign collaborator supplied a complete set of drawings, designs, charts, plans and related …

STATE BANK OF INDIAversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ERNAKULAM

1985 INSC 234Dismissed

The appellant, formerly Bank of Cochin Ltd., purchased foreign‑currency negotiable instruments as part of its banking business and later realised the proceeds in foreign banks. When the Indian rupee was devalued on 6 June 1966, the rupee value of these foreign‑exchange assets increased by Rs …

SHREE SAJJAN MILLS LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, M.P, BHOPAL AND ANR,

1985 INSC 224Dismissed

Sajjian Mills Ltd, a public limited company, incurred a statutory liability to pay gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 and actuarially determined its total liability of Rs 48,59,431 for the assessment year 1973‑74. It made a provision of Rs 20 lakhs in its books, added it back in its …

SMT. SAROJ AGGARWALversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,U.P.

1985 INSC 217Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Saroj Aggarwal, was the widow of a partner who died in 1959. After his death a new partnership deed was executed, admitting her and an adopted son as partners. The deceased had unabsorbed speculation losses from earlier years. In the assessment year 1962‑63, the appellant claimed to …

SHRL SUNIL SLDDHARTHBHAL ETCversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AHMEDABAD ETC.

1985 INSC 207Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a partner in two different partnership firms, contributed shares of limited companies to the firms as capital. The Revenue argued that the contribution constituted a transfer of a capital asset under section 45 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and that a capital gain arose because the …

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BANGALOREversusSRI J.H. GOTLA, YADAGIRI

1985 INSC 187Dismissed

The assessee, an oil‑mill owner, gifted part of his machinery to his wife and three minor children and a firm was formed by his wife and another person. The firm leased the mill premises and machinery and the assessee rendered management services, receiving commission. The assessee had large losses …

DISTRIBUTORS (BARODA) PVT. LTD.versusUNION OF INDIA AND TWO ORS.

1985 INSC 143Dismissed

Distributors (Baroda) Ltd., an investment company, claimed a deduction under Section 80M of the Income Tax Act for inter‑corporate dividends based on the full amount of dividends received, contrary to the Revenue’s view that the deduction should be calculated on dividend income as computed under the …

K.C. JOSHIversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1985 INSC 98Appeal(s) allowed

K.C. Joshi was appointed as Store Keeper in the Oil and Natural Gas Commission (ONGC) and, after completing his probation, was placed on the regular establishment. He was an active trade‑union worker and, following union actions, his services were terminated on 29 December 1967 with one month’s pay …

MURARI MOHAN DEBversusTHE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA & ORS.

1985 INSC 82Appeal(s) allowed

Murari Mohan Deb, a Class IV forester of the Tripura Government, was compulsorily retired in 1962 by the Chief Forest Officer. He challenged the order, alleging denial of a fair hearing and violation of natural‑justice principles. The respondents contended that compulsory retirement is not a …

SANT RAJ & ANR.versusO.P. SINGLA & ANR.

1985 INSC 81Case Partly allowed

Two loaders, Sant Raj and Itwari Lal Sherya, were terminated by their employer, a foreign air‑transport company. The Labour Court held the termination to be retrenchment and illegal because the employer had not complied with Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and awarded them one …

Y. RAMANJANEYULUversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ORS.

1985 INSC 75Case Partly allowed

The appellant, a civil servant in the Cooperative Societies department, claimed that Government Order No. 559 (May 4, 1961) entitled him to a promotion to Deputy Registrar in 1965 under the principle of reservation extended to all cadres. He filed a representation petition in 1977, which the …

M/S LOHIA MACHINES LIMITED AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1985 INSC 14Dismissed

The petitioners, industrial undertakings, challenged the validity of Rule 19A of the Income‑Tax Rules, 1962, which excluded borrowed capital and fixed the computation of "capital employed" on the first day of the previous year for the purpose of the tax exemption under Section 80J of the Income‑Tax …

WORKMEN OF HINDUSTAN STEEL LTD. AND ANR.versusHINDUSTAN STEEL LTD. AND ORS.

1984 INSC 237Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined the dismissal of an assistant of Hindustan Steel Ltd. who was removed from service under Standing Order 32 on the ground that his continued employment was "inexpedient". The employer dispensed with the disciplinary enquiry prescribed in Standing Order 31 and did not record …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ANDHRA PRADESHversusM. CHANDRA SEKHAR

1984 INSC 229Dismissed

The assessee filed voluntary income‑tax returns after the statutory deadline prescribed under s.139(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Income Tax Officer levied interest under clause (iii) of the proviso to s.139(1) and treated the assessee as in default, imposing penalties under s.271(1)(a). The …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CALCUTTAversusDALHOUSIE PROPERTIES LTD.

1984 INSC 157Dismissed

Dalhousie Properties Ltd, assessed for the year 1966-67, claimed a deduction of Rs.1,78,784 for municipal taxes under the proviso to section 23(1) of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961, arguing that the deduction should be allowed on the basis of the tax liability even though the amount was not fully paid and …

P. JAYAPPANversusS.K. PERUMAL, FIRST INCOME-TAX OFFICER, TUTICORIN

1984 INSC 147Dismissed

The petitioner, a proprietor of a food business, filed income‑tax returns that were later found to contain false statements and suppressed transactions after a search of his premises. Complaints were lodged against him under sections 276C and 277 of the Income‑Tax Act and sections 193 and 196 of the …

COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, KANPURversusM/S. J.K. COTTON MANUFACTURERS LTD.

1984 INSC 49Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether tax liabilities arising from settlements under the Taxation on Income (Investigation Commission) Act, 1947, which remained unpaid at the valuation dates, could be deducted as debts owed in computing net wealth under the Wealth‑Tax Act, 1957. The assessee companies …

SMT. M.M. AMONKAR & OTHERSversusDR. S.A. JOHARI

1984 INSC 41Appeal(s) allowed

Dr. S.A. Johari, an honorary surgeon attached to Dr. Amonkar Hospital, occupied a small cabin within the hospital premises and paid a monthly compensation. The Amonkar family, owners of the premises, gave notice terminating his attachment and sought his eviction. Johari filed a suit claiming he was …

C.I.T. WEST BENGAL - III & ORS. ETC.versusORIENTAL RUBBER WORKS ETC .

1983 INSC 176Dismissed

The Income Tax Department seized the books of account and documents of Oriental Rubber Works under section 132(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and retained them beyond the statutory period of 180 days. The assessee contended that the Revenue failed to communicate the Commissioner’s approval and the …

COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, MADRASversusK. S. N. BHATT

1983 INSC 158Appeal(s) allowed

The assessee, K.S.N. Bhatt, claimed deductions in his wealth‑tax returns for income‑tax, wealth‑tax and gift‑tax liabilities, arguing that these amounts were debts owed on the valuation dates for the assessment years 1964‑65 to 1967‑68. The Wealth Tax Officer allowed only part of the deductions; the …