Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
17481 judgments · newest first · showing 8601–8800
The Patna High Court heard two anticipatory bail petitions arising from PS Maharajganj Case No.242 of 2021. The first petition (Cr. Misc. No.6306) sought bail on the ground of a post‑FIR compromise, but the court held that the offence was heinous and non‑compoundable, so the earlier denial of bail …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar, was named as an accused in a 2019 case involving alleged offences under Sections 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a) and 38(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, after 167.320 litres of illicit liquor were seized from a truck. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Daya Singh, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case registered under Sections 366A and 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act for allegedly raping the minor daughter of an informant. The prosecution …
Petitioners Nawal Ram and Manoj Ram sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR alleging murder, grievous hurt, and criminal conspiracy under IPC sections 302, 328 and 120B. They contended that the informant, who was not an eye‑witness, fabricated the case because of a matrimonial …
The petitioner, Ranjeet Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from a 2023 FIR alleging kidnapping of a minor and related offences under Sections 364, 323 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The victim's statement, recorded under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure …
The petitioner, Sashank Shekhar, sought anticipatory bail in a complaint (No. 146 of 2016) alleging offences under IPC sections 323, 494, 498A, 504 and 34, stemming from a family dispute over a second marriage. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, after a first marriage, entered a second …
Amit Kumar was named in an FIR for a violent assault that resulted in the death of an informant's son, with charges under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act. He contended that the FIR only described him as a member of the mob without alleging any specific overt act, unlike …
The petitioner, Raju Prasad, sought regular bail in a case registered under multiple IPC sections including assault, grievous hurt, attempt to murder, and robbery. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, armed, assaulted the informant Kanti Devi, causing grievous injuries to her hand and a …
The petitioners, three brothers, sought anticipatory bail in a case alleging offences under various IPC sections, including assault and robbery. The informant claimed the brothers entered his house armed, assaulted his sons, and looted Rs.31,000. Counsel for the petitioners argued that only the …
The petitioner, Ranjan Kumar, was named in an FIR for offences under IPC Section 414, the Arms Act (Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26, 35) and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018 (Section 30(a)) after co‑accused disclosed his name. No weapon or illicit liquor was recovered from his possession and he …
The petitioner, Farhad Ansari, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case alleging his involvement in attempted rape and the creation of obscene photographs. The FIR named him among accused persons under Sections 376, 504, 506, 509, 511, and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section …
The petitioner, Biren Sada, was named in an FIR alleging assault with a lathi, danda and iron rod that resulted in the death of the informant's brother, invoking IPC sections 341, 323, 325, 302, 504, 506/34. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated due to a pre‑existing dispute and …
Vijay Kumar Singh sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case (Saharsa Sadar PS Case No. 749 of 2023) alleging his involvement in murder, conspiracy and destruction of evidence under IPC sections 302, 201 and 120B. The informant alleged that the deceased’s illicit relationship with a …
Badal Kumar was charged with offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 326, 307, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing a pistol at an informant, causing injury to the informant's right knee. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail, claiming innocence …
The petitioner, Md Abid Hussain, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry harassment case (Wazirganj P.S. Case No. 225 of 2022) under Section 498A of the IPC and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that after a Muslim marriage in 2019, the petitioner demanded …
The petitioner, Pankaj Kumar Sahani, faced a complaint filed in 2018 alleging offences under IPC sections 323, 324, 379, 406, 498A and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, claiming he and his family demanded dowry and subjected the complainant to torture. The complainant, married to the …
The petitioner, Ramashish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑harassment complaint (Case No.1307/2022) alleging offences under IPC sections 323, 341, 354, 504, 506 and 498A. The prosecution alleged that after their 2016 marriage the petitioner demanded Rs 2 lakh as dowry, …
Petitioner Rajeev Kumar was implicated in a FIR (Noorsarai P.S. Case No. 566 of 2023) for allegedly forging his educational certificate to obtain a Panchayat Teacher position, invoking IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B). He contended that the certificate was initially accepted, that a later …
Pankaj Kumar Bharti, an employee of Muthooth Microfinance Company Ltd., was implicated in a case (PS Case No. 347 of 2023) for alleged misappropriation of Rs. 376,445 from 268 customers, invoking Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail, asserting that …
The petitioner, Rajeshwar Sah, applied for anticipatory bail in a complaint (Case No. 816 of 2023) alleging offences under IPC Sections 420, 467 and 468 relating to a fraudulent land sale. He claimed the allegations were false, arising from a prior land dispute involving the complainant Bhabhuka …
The petitioner, Avinash Kumar Saxena, sought anticipatory bail in a case alleging offences under Sections 498A, 354 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, filed by his wife Shobha Kumari. The FIR alleged mental and physical cruelty due to dowry demands. Both parties later claimed that …
The petitioners, who run Abrar Enterprises, were implicated in a FIR alleging offences under Sections 406, 420, 504, 506 and 34 of the IPC for allegedly failing to pay the informant for a paddy consignment worth Rs. 13.59 crore. The petitioners contend that the dispute is purely civil, that they …
The appellants were convicted for assaulting the informant and his wife during a family dispute over a gift deed, resulting in injuries. They were found guilty under Sections 323, 325 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to six months and three years of rigorous imprisonment, respectively, …
The petitioner, Om Prakash Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a complaint under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code alleging dowry harassment, physical assault, and attempted miscarriage of his wife, Aarti Kumari. The complaint detailed demands for additional dowry, harassment, and assault during …
Rakesh Kumar, accused of looting gold, diamonds and cash from a jewellery shop, was charged under Sections 395, 397 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code. He had earlier applied for regular bail, which was rejected on 29 February 2024, with the court directing speedy trial of all related cases. The …
The petitioner, Gaffar Ansari, sought anticipatory bail in a criminal complaint alleging offences under IPC sections 323, 498A, 34 and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The High Court had earlier ordered mediation, resulting in a compromise between the husband and wife, documented in a …
Rohit Kumar was charged under IPC sections 307, 326, 302 and 34 and Section 27 of the Arms Act for a murder‑extortion incident. His first bail application was rejected on 28‑08‑2024. He filed a second bail petition claiming that trial witnesses had turned hostile. The State opposed the bail, …
The petitioners, Sandeep Mahato and Sujeet Mahato, sought bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Kundwachainpur No. 64 of 2020) that alleged multiple offences including assault, robbery, arson and violations of the Epidemic Disease Act and the D.M. Act. The FIR alleged that they assaulted an informant’s …
The appellant, Ramswaroop Harijan, was convicted by the Sessions Court for dacoity under Section 395 IPC based primarily on the identification by the informant's wife, Sakuntala Devi, while the informant himself could not be examined due to his death. The High Court examined contradictions between …
The petitioner, Md Mahboob Alam, was implicated in a complaint (No. 575C of 2020) alleging cheating under Sections 420 and 504 of the IPC for receiving advance payments of Rs.1,11,000 and Rs.2,43,000 without executing the sale deed. The informant further claimed an additional cash payment of Rs.5 …
The petitioner, Uma Shankar Singh, was implicated in a case (Navinagar P.S. Case No. 65 of 2025) involving alleged assault with weapons, for which several IPC offences were alleged. The petitioner claimed innocence, asserting that the assault was committed by a co-accused, Shivam, and that there …
The petitioner, Ritesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a matrimonial dispute complaint (Case No. 5792 of 2024) filed under IPC sections 494, 498A, 34 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. Both parties had mediated, reached a compromise, and the petitioner paid a settlement of Rs. 11,00,000 to his wife. …
The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a matrimonial dispute case involving offences under the IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. Both spouses had agreed to live separately, and the petitioner offered to pay Rs. 1,00,000 to the wife as settlement. The court …
The petitioner, Surendra Singh, was implicated in a murder case (Baghaila PS Case No.71 of 2024) originally registered under Section 365 IPC, later amended to include Sections 302, 201 and 120B IPC. He alleged that he was falsely implicated and pointed out that a co‑accused, Tunu Kumar, had already …
Arbind Singh (Petitioner) was implicated in a matrimonial dispute complaint (Case No. 128 of 2022) alleging offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Dowry Prohibition Act. Mediation ordered by the court failed to resolve the dispute. The petitioner claimed innocence and …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a Mahila police case involving alleged offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 498A/34 and section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The case stemmed from a marriage in 2020 where the informant alleged dowry‑related harassment and …
Indu Devi, the wife of Saheb Yadav, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 363 and 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 8 and 17 of the POCSO Act. The trial was at the stage of final arguments before the Special Judge (POCSO Act) in Siwan. The petitioner argued …
Akhaya Lal Sah applied for pre‑arrest bail in a complaint case involving alleged offences under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and Sections 420, 323, 341 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. The matter was earlier referred to the Patna High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre, but …
The petitioner, Anand Murti, was charged under Sections 363, 364, 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for offences including robbery, dacoity, murder, and conspiracy. He applied for regular bail for the third time, having previously been denied twice. The petitioner argued that the trial was …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR (Garahiya Bazar PS Case No. 61 of 2025) alleged his involvement in a violent assault on a minor, charging him under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, …
The petitioner, Arjun Kumar Singh, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a complaint case registered under IPC sections 406, 420 and 34. The dispute could not be settled through mediation, as evidenced by a mediator’s report dated 30‑10‑2025. The High Court examined the seriousness of the alleged offences, …
The petitioner, Dhrup Sahni, was arrested in connection with a rape allegation under multiple sections of the BNS, 2023, the Indian Penal Code and the POCSO Act. He sought bail, arguing that the FIR was lodged three days after the incident, there was prior enmity between the parties, and the medical …
The petitioner, Shahnawaj Darji, a 20‑year‑old, was charged in a kidnapping case involving the minor daughter of an informant, alleged to have been abducted for sale in the flesh trade. The FIR named him under IPC sections 363, 366(A) and 34, and the State highlighted his prior criminal antecedent …
The petitioner, Md. Ashraf Khan, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 406 and 420/34 IPC alleging he fraudulently obtained Rs.6 lakh by promising a medical college admission for the informant's son. He contended that the matter was essentially a civil monetary dispute and sought an …
The petitioner, Chandrashekhar Rai, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case arising from a land‑dispute‑related assault alleged under several sections of the BNS and the IPC. He claimed innocence, a clean record, and expressed willingness to settle the matter amicably through mediation. The State also …
The petitioner, Anoj Kumar, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a complaint alleging offences under Sections 380, 420, 406, 408, 467, 468, 471 and 504 IPC relating to alleged misappropriation of land documents and fraudulent loan. The State opposed the bail, while the petitioner claimed innocence and …
The petitioner, Dilkhush Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case involving multiple serious offences under the Indian Penal Code, including murder and attempted murder. The trial is nearing completion, and the petitioner has been in custody since June 2024. The trial court had previously rejected …
Manu Kumar, accused of stabbing and murdering a person under Sections 326, 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, applied for regular bail for the second time. The trial is underway with four of seven witnesses already examined. The petitioner argued that the trial progress warranted bail, but the …
The petitioners, a group of seventeen women from Kargil Tola, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with FIR No.95 of 2025 filed under multiple IPC sections and a threat allegation under the SC/ST Act. The FIR alleged that the women, in a land‑dispute context, threatened the …
The petitioner, Suraj Kumar Das, was charged under IPC sections 363, 366A and 34 and POCSO Act sections 8 and 12 for allegedly kidnapping a girl for marriage. The FIR was lodged a year after the alleged incident, and the victim later testified that she left home voluntarily and was in a consensual …
Munna Sah, a 22‑year‑old student, was named in an FIR for offences under the IPC, the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act after the informant Lalan Paswan alleged his daughter was abducted and assaulted. The petitioner claimed the girl was a consenting adult who left home voluntarily and married him, and …
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, was charged under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act in a case registered on 28 February 2023. He applied for regular bail for the third time, having been in custody since the date of arrest and with the trial already commenced. Earlier …
Bikash Kumar petitioned the Patna High Court for anticipatory bail, fearing arrest in a 2020 FIR alleging offences under sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 324 and 34 of the IPC. The FIR arose from a land dispute in which the petitioner and his family were accused of assaulting the informant, Bhairolal …
The petitioner, Shashikant Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered in 2014 under sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 311/34 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged cheating and forgery related to a promised tower installation. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner induced the …
Sunita Devi sought bail fearing arrest in a complaint (Case No. 455 of 2024) alleging cheating under IPC Section 420 concerning a land transaction. The complainant claimed she sold him a plot which she had already sold to a third party, leading to a dispute over mutation of the land. The petitioner …
Petitioner Purushotam Kumar Singh was apprehended for possible arrest in a murder case (Case No. 154 of 2022) involving offences under IPC sections 302, 120(B), 34 and Arms Act section 27. He was not named in the FIR and the police had filed a closure report in his favour, which was accepted by the …
The petitioner, Sunny Deval Yadav, was named in an FIR for murder, culpable homicide, conspiracy and abetment (IPC §§302, 201, 120(B), 34) and sought anticipatory bail. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that co‑accused had been granted bail, and that the FIR only alleged he called the …
The petitioner, Vikash Singh, was charged under Sections 302, 307, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. His earlier bail application was rejected on 9 July 2025. He filed a second regular bail application on 18 October 2025, about three and a half months after the rejection. …
The petitioner, Rajendra Prasad Tanti, was arrested in connection with a case registered on 17‑04‑2023 under multiple serious offences including murder (IPC §§ 147,148,149,341,323,324,307,120(b),302,504,506). He had previously filed two bail applications, one withdrawn and another rejected. The …
The petitioners, Ravi Kumar Kushwaha and Babloo Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Andar PS No.64/2024) involving multiple IPC offences including kidnapping, assault and extortion. The informant, Mahfooz Alam, alleged that the accused abducted him, assaulted him and …
Vikash Kumar was arrested in connection with a case filed under IPC sections 363 and 366(A) and section 8 of the POSCO Act, based on an FIR lodged by Satyendra Bharti alleging that Kumar forced the minor girl Nishu Kumari to marry him. The girl later gave a statement under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. …
Mantosh Kumar was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 363 and 365 of the Indian Penal Code. He applied for regular bail for the third time after two earlier rejections. The petitioner has been in custody since 10 August 2022 and the trial has already commenced. The court …
Lalmuni Devi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (PS No. 681/2023) involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 325, 354, 504 and later 302/34 of the IPC. The prosecution alleged that the accused assaulted the victim, who later died. The petitioner submitted that the …
The petitioner, Nazir Hussain, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Sections 302, 201, 34 IPC) and has been in custody since July 2023. He applied for regular bail for the third time, claiming that all trial witnesses have been examined. The trial court noted that the deceased's body was …
The petitioners, Kallu and Abhishek Singh, were implicated in an assault and robbery case (IPC Sections 341, 342, 323, 324, 307, 379, 387, 504, 506, 34) based on an informant’s statement that they, along with unknown persons, attacked a victim and stole Rs.50,000. The petitioners contended that the …
The petitioner, Nitu Kumari, feared arrest in a case originally registered under IPC sections 304B (dowry death) and 201/34 (causing disappearance of evidence). She contended that she was not a victim of homicide but had voluntarily eloped with Sunil Kumar, who was subsequently arrested along with …
The petitioners, Sarita Devi and Rangila Kumar, mother‑in‑law and brother‑in‑law of the deceased, were implicated in a dowry‑death case (Shahkund P.S. Case No. 123 of 2024) under Sections 304B and 201 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for allegedly causing the death of the …
Petitioners Saurav Kumar and Gaurab Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, the MMDR Act and the B.M.M Illegal Transportation & Storage Rules. They contended that they were falsely implicated, not owners or drivers …
The petitioners Kundan Kumar Chaubey and Vishal Singh applied for regular bail in a murder‑conspiracy case (Shikarpur P.S. Case No. 975 of 2022) involving offences under IPC sections 302, 307, 34, 120B and Arms Act section 27. Their earlier bail plea had been rejected and they had been in custody …
Kapilesh Kumar sought bail after an FIR was lodged under Sections 406, 409 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code alleging that he furnished false documents to obtain flood‑relief funds for ineligible persons in collusion with a Circle Officer and revenue staff. The petitioner argued that the relief amount …
The petitioners, Wakil Mian and Md. Bablu, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with a 2017 case (PS No.151) involving numerous IPC offences. They argued they have clean antecedents and that the FIR is vague, omnibus, and falsely implicates them for allegedly blocking a road and …
Sunil Chandrawanshi was arrested in connection with a dacoity of Rs.2,37,265 from Gramin Bank, charged under Sections 392 and 395 of the Indian Penal Code, and has been in custody since December 1, 2023. He is also accused in five other criminal cases. The petitioner applied for regular bail for the …
The petitioners Kundan Kumar Chaubey and Vishal Singh applied for regular bail in a murder‑conspiracy case (Shikarpur P.S. Case No. 975 of 2022) involving offences under IPC sections 302, 307, 34, 120B and Arms Act section 27. Their earlier bail plea had been rejected and they had been in custody …
Raju Kumar, a compounder at a nursing home, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving alleged rape, criminal conspiracy, intimidation, and the publication of obscene material under IPC sections 376, 120B, 506, 34 and IT Act section 67. He contended that he was not …
The petitioners, three agnates of the informant, were charged with multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code, including assault, grievous hurt and attempted murder, arising from a family dispute. They sought bail, arguing that the FIR was lodged two days after the incident, the injuries were …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, was charged under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Mahendra Yadav. He applied for regular bail for the second time after an earlier bail application was rejected. The prosecution argued that the petitioner’s name appeared in a …
The petitioner, Deepak Bhagat, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a dowry‑death case involving offences under Sections 304B, 498A and 34 of the IPC. He contended that the informant was not an eye‑witness, that the death was a suicide, and that there were no prior …
The petitioner, husband of the complainant, applied for bail in a criminal complaint (Case No. 10C of 2024) alleging offences under IPC sections 323, 334, 498A/34 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. The dispute arose from matrimonial discord, with the wife leaving the matrimonial home after …
The petitioner, Sujeet Kumar Thapchi, was arrested on 21 May 2024 in connection with a case involving alleged gang activity in charas and other illegal substances. He faced charges under IPC sections 399, 402 and 412, the Arms Act sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35, and NDPS Act sections 8 and …
Jay Prakash Narayan Singh, a former branch manager of Koilawan Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, was charged with offences under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 409 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly withdrawing Rs.12.48 lakh fraudulently. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that the FIR was lodged …
Arvind Kumar Yadav, a former branch manager of the Khagaria District Central Co‑operative Bank, was implicated in a fraud case (PS No. 167 of 2024) alleging that Rs 4,70,176 deposited by a shopkeeper through an agent, Mithilesh Kumar, was misappropriated. The petitioner contended that he had …
The petitioner, Sanoj Kumar, was charged under Section 365 of the Indian Penal Code for attempting to cause death and later under Section 302 for murder, based on allegations that he pushed the informant's son into a river. He has been in custody since May 19, 2024, and previously applied for …
The petitioner, Ali Hussain, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with FIR No. 172 of 2023 that alleged offences under several IPC sections. He asserted a clean antecedent and claimed false implication by the informant, alleging a dispute over a Madarsa that led to mutual assaults. …
The petitioner, Santosh Mahto, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly looting a motorcycle and mobile phone at gunpoint. The prosecution presented a self‑inculpatory statement of a co‑accused, other incriminating material, and …
The petitioner, Ranjan Manjhi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case (PS‑Atri, Gaya) involving alleged offences under several IPC sections including 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 504 and 506. He contended that he has a …
The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 419, 420 and 34 of the IPC read with Section 10 of the Bihar Conduct of Examination Act, 1981. He asserted a clean record and claimed he was merely giving an examination on behalf of another …
The petitioners, Gagan Raj and Biru Paswan, applied for bail in two separate criminal miscellaneous proceedings arising from a dacoity case (Section 395 IPC) involving robbery of gold and cash, and alleged violations of the Arms Act (Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 34). Both had previously been denied …
The petitioner, Dilkhush Kumar, was charged under Sections 395, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for a dacoity involving Rs. 4,30,000. He applied for regular bail for the second time after his earlier bail application was rejected on 19-03-2025. The prosecution alleged that unknown criminals …
The petitioners, seven young men from Karneji village, were named in FIR No. 180 of 2025 for alleged assault and robbery against an informant and his family, involving weapons such as an iron rod, a sharp cutting instrument and a bamboo stick, and the theft of a gold chain and Rs.18,000. They …
The petitioners, a group of Patels from Gamhariya Kala, sought relief fearing arrest in connection with Darpa P.S. Case No.34 of 2024, which alleged offences including robbery, assault and other IPC crimes. They contended that the incident stemmed from a land dispute that escalated into a free …
Navin Kumar was arrested in connection with a case registered on 5 January 2024 for offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 34 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 66(B) and 66(D) of the Income Tax Act. He applied for regular bail for the third time after two earlier applications …
The petitioner, DSP Diaspi Kumar, was arrested in connection with a murder case (S.Tr. No. 99 of 2024) alleged under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR accuses him, along with co‑accused, of killing the wife of an informant, but the investigation …
The petitioner, Omprakash Kumar, was arrested on 4 March 2024 in connection with a case registered under Sections 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He sought regular bail for the second time, arguing that no witness had been examined in the trial and that a …
Lalan Ray applied for bail in a murder case under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. An earlier anticipatory bail application had been rejected by a coordinate bench of the Patna High Court and the Supreme Court also denied special leave. The prosecution’s case is based on a confessional …
Kamlesh Kumar was implicated in a kidnapping case (Sections 363 and 366 IPC) after the victim’s statement under Section 164 CrPC named him as having accompanied the co‑accused Ranjan Kumar in forcibly taking her, her ornaments and her two‑year‑old son. The petitioner argued that the FIR was lodged …
The petitioner, Ravindra Sahni, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code alleging kidnapping and sexual assault of a minor. He contended that he has a clean antecedent and was falsely implicated by the informant, highlighting a three‑day delay in …
The petitioner, Prakash Kumar Pathak, applied for regular bail in a complaint case registered under IPC sections 420, 120B and 34, alleging that he was falsely implicated in a cheating scheme involving a fake lucky draw. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner received money from the complainant …
The petitioner, Animish Kumar, was implicated in a case under Sections 406 and 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly receiving Rs.2,94,000 from an informant who sought a back‑door appointment as Sub‑Inspector. The petitioner contended that he has a clean record and that the informant’s …
The petitioner, Prince Kumar, was arrested in February 2024 in connection with a murder case (PS Case No. 120 of 2024) alleging he and others killed the son of an informant by cutting his neck, charged under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He applied for regular bail, which was …
The petitioner, Prince Kumar Khalnayak, was charged under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act for a robbery in which cash was snatched at gunpoint. He has ten prior criminal antecedents but contends that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and identified …
The petitioner, Jitendra Nut, was charged under Sections 396, 397 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code for dacoity and dacoity with murder. He applied for bail for the third time after two earlier applications were rejected. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the trial was being delayed and that this …
Pawan Kumar was arrested in May 2023 in connection with a case registered under Sections 448, 452, 376 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that he raped a woman at gunpoint. The petitioner applied for bail, contending that the victim was in a consensual relationship with him and that the …
The petitioner, Md. Quddush, applied for regular bail in a murder case (Sections 302/34 IPC) arising from Gaya Muffasil P.S. Case No. 315 of 2024. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and others killed the deceased and that the petitioner had previously fired at the victim. The petitioner had …
Yogendra Pandit was charged under Sections 302, 120(B), 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly contracting the murder of a deceased person. He has been in custody since February 2024 and previously applied for bail, which was rejected on the ground that he was the …
The petitioner, Chandan Yadav, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 126(2), 109, 352, 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that he and co‑accused stopped an informant and that co‑accused Jitendra Kumar fired at the informant. The …
The petitioner, Raja Singh, was charged under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code for a robbery in which Rs. 10.95 lakh was allegedly looted. He sought bail for the second time after an earlier bail application was rejected. The prosecution relied on a self‑inculpatory statement of co‑accused …
The petitioner, Dhiraj Kumar, was charged under IPC sections 323, 354(D), 504, 506/34, 307 and Arms Act section 27 for allegedly posting obscene images of an informant and her sister, assaulting the informant, and firing a weapon that caused injury. The petitioner claimed innocence, asserted a …
Milan Kumar Paswan was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 366A and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly kidnapping a minor girl for marriage. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code did not support the prosecution, and the …
Amarjeet Paswan was arrested in connection with a case alleging assault with a knife, charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed the allegations were false, stemming from a personal grudge, and argued that the injury was minor and not corroborated by medical evidence. The …
The petitioner, Ashok Yadav, was charged under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly assaulting the deceased. He applied for regular bail, having been in custody since 29 January 2025. The trial had already commenced and three of six prosecution …
The petitioner, Hirday Paswan, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code for robbery and assault. The petition had previously been rejected. The State argued that the petitioner was implicated through co‑accused statements and is also charged in six …
The petitioner, Aman Kumar, was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case (Section 365 IPC) concerning the abduction of the informant’s father on 7 July 2022. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with co‑accused, had threatened the victim’s father prior to the kidnapping. The …
The petitioner, Pawan Kumar, was arrested in connection with the murder of his two‑year‑old child, initially alleged against other suspects but later self‑confessed to the crime. He is charged under Sections 120(B), 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner filed a second bail application …
The petitioner, Tuntun Bind, was arrested in connection with a murder case (PS Case No. 84 of 2019) involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that the informant was not an eye‑witness, …
The petitioner, Prabhakar Kumar, was charged under IPC sections 341, 323, 307, 120(B)/34 and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly shooting an informant who later died. He had previously sought anticipatory bail, which was withdrawn, and regular bail, which was rejected. In the present hearing, …
The petitioner, Kanchan Mandal, applied for regular bail in a case registered under sections 363, 366A, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging kidnapping of a 14‑year‑old girl for marriage. The prosecution’s informant claimed the girl was abducted by the petitioner and another accused, …
The petitioners, three brothers from Harpurnag Tola, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Trial No. 1998 of 2022) stemming from a 2000 FIR that alleged they assaulted and strangled an informant, invoking IPC sections 447, 341, 323, 504 and 307/34. They contended that they were …
The petitioner, Ranjan Kumar, was arrested in connection with a 2019 case (Harnaut PS No.503) alleging kidnapping and dacoity under IPC sections 363, 365 and 34. The informant claimed her husband, a professional driver, went missing after a phone call on 22‑11‑2019 and alleged that the petitioner …
Petitioners Gagan Raj and Biru Paswan applied for bail in separate criminal miscellaneous proceedings concerning a dacoity (IPC Sec. 395) and violations of the Arms Act (Secs. 25(1‑b)a, 26, 34). Their earlier bail applications had been rejected on 7 March 2025. The prosecution alleged that unknown …
Munna Kumar Mahto was arrested in connection with a FIR alleging offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. He had previously been denied anticipatory bail by a coordinate bench of the Patna High Court. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, that no …
The petitioner, Md. Saddam, was implicated in a fraud case (Sultanganj P.S. Case No. 177 of 2024) involving alleged cheating and intimidation under IPC sections 420, 406, 506 and 34. He offered to pay a total restitution of Rs. 5,00,000, proposing Rs. 2,50,000 on surrender and the balance within six …
Saroj Yadav was charged under several serious provisions of the Indian Penal Code (sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 385, 307, 504, 506) and section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing at a victim. He has been in custody since 19‑12‑2024 and is alleged to have been an absconder for seven years, with …
The petitioner, Pappu Kumar Yadav, was arrested in connection with a robbery alleged under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code, wherein Rs. 1,00,000 was looted and a motorcycle was recovered. The co‑accused’s self‑inculpatory statement implicated the petitioner. He applied for regular bail, but the …
The petitioner, Md. Sonu, was arrested in connection with a robbery and shooting incident alleged to have occurred in Patna, and is charged under Sections 394 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case relies on the informant’s statement and a …
The petitioner, Lalu Ganju, was arrested in connection with a robbery (Section 392 IPC) in which a container truck’s tyre was punctured and cash and a motorcycle were stolen. The prosecution’s case relied on a confessional statement of a co‑accused, Parmeshwar Ganju, and alleged that the petitioner …
The petitioner, Sonu Rai, was arrested in connection with a robbery and dacoity case (Sections 395 and 379 IPC) where nine unknown assailants allegedly looted a motorist. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, noting that he was not named in the FIR and that the only link to him …
The petitioner, Md. Sk Kamran, was charged under IPC sections 379, 411, 413 and 414 for alleged theft of a motorcycle, with co‑accused statements implicating him. He had been in custody since 1 October 2024 and possessed two prior criminal antecedents of a similar nature, which he had suppressed …
The petitioner, Jai Ram Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Chanan P.S. Case No. 78 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, including assault and abetment. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, assaulted an informant …
Suraj Kumar was named in an FIR for alleged assault on a police constable during an incident at Barabar hill, with charges under several IPC sections including assault and attempt to murder. He contended that he was not present at the scene, the allegations were vague, and he had a clean antecedent. …
The petitioner, Shamser Alam, was arrested in connection with a triple murder case involving poisoning of three women, charged under Sections 302, 34 and 306 of the Indian Penal Code. He contended that he has no criminal antecedents, was not named in the FIR, and that the only material against him …
The petitioners, three residents of Sirisiya Maath, were implicated in a 2012 forest‑related case alleging illegal felling of Sheesham, Jamun and Putrajiva trees and assault on forest officials during a seizure operation. They contend they were not present at the incident, no incriminating material …
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, was charged under IPC sections 406, 420, 468, 469, 384 and 506 for allegedly posing as a cyber expert, extracting Rs 7.40 lakh from an informant by false promises, and threatening him with extortion. He has been in custody since 18‑06‑2025 and possesses fourteen prior …
Pawan Kumar and Nawin Kumar, accused of offences including wrongful restraint, hurt, attempted murder, murder with common intention and a violation of the Arms Act, applied for bail for a case registered on 30‑09‑2023. Their earlier bail plea was rejected on 24‑04‑2024. In a second bail application …
The petitioner, Sajan Kumar (also known as Tabla/Suraj Kumar), was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 413, 414 and 34 of the IPC for allegedly purchasing a stolen motorcycle from a co‑accused. The prosecution's case relied mainly on the co‑accused’s confessional statement, …
The petitioner, Manoj Kumar, sought bail in a case (PS No.375 of 2019) involving alleged offences under IPC sections 376, 420, 406, 506, 34 and POCSO Act sections 4 and 6, relating to alleged sexual assault of a minor and financial fraud. He claimed innocence, highlighted a five‑month delay in …
The petitioner, Dinesh Sah, was charged under Sections 302 and 201 of the IPC for the murder of the informant's son, whose body was found near a railway track. The prosecution alleged a love affair between the deceased and the petitioner's daughter and presented witness statements and mobile call …
Abu Mohammad applied for anticipatory bail in a case where he was implicated based on the confessional statement of a co-accused, Md. Kaif, in a police raid that recovered weapons, live ammunition and narcotics. The prosecution alleged offences under several sections of the IPC, the Arms Act and the …
The petitioner, Ratan Yadav, was charged under IPC sections 302, 307, 120B/34 and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing indiscriminately and causing death. He applied for regular bail for the second time after an earlier bail denial on 23.10.2024. The High Court noted that the charge sheet …
The petitioner, Nitu Rai, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 498(A) and 304(B) read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging his involvement in the dowry death of his wife. The prosecution alleged that the deceased was subjected to cruelty and financial …
Krishna Kumar was arrested for allegedly forging his intermediate mark‑sheet and certificate to obtain a government teaching post, and is charged under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(b). He applied for bail, claiming innocence, lack of prior criminal record, and that he had submitted all …
The petitioner, Govardhan Chauhan, was charged under Sections 304(b), 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly strangling his daughter‑in‑law over a dowry demand. He contended that he was falsely implicated, asserting that the deceased had committed suicide by ingesting poison and that he …
The petitioner, Om Narayan Manjhi, was arrested in connection with a neighbourhood dispute that led to an alleged assault on an informant and others, resulting in charges under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 397, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner contended that the incident was a …
Pammy Devi, the petitioner, was arrested in a complaint case alleging forgery and cheating under Sections 467, 468 and 34 of the IPC related to a land dispute. She contended that she was the bona‑fide purchaser of the land, that the matter was essentially a civil family dispute, and that she had a …
Bullet Ansari was charged under IPC sections 363, 302, 120B, 201 and 34 for allegedly kidnapping and killing the son of an informant. He had previously been denied bail, but argued that the case was based only on suspicion, with no incriminating material recovered and no eyewitnesses, and that only …
The petitioner, Ranjan Kumar, applied for bail in a case of robbery at gunpoint under Section 310(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (equivalent to Section 395 IPC). He claimed innocence, alleging that his name was added to the FIR based on a coerced confessional statement of a co‑accused and …
Bambam Singh was arrested in connection with a murder case (Section 302 IPC) involving alleged conspiracy (Section 120B IPC) and common intention (Section 34 IPC), as well as illegal possession of arms (Section 27 Arms Act). He applied for regular bail, but the trial had already commenced and the …
The Patna High Court considered an application for bail by Raj Kumar Yadav, who is in custody for a 2010 robbery (IPC Section 395) involving the theft of money and a mobile phone from a van driver. The prosecution alleged that he had evaded the authorities for more than two years before being taken …
The petitioner, Kamlesh Pathak, was arrested in connection with a 2002 dacoity and murder case (Section 396 IPC) based solely on a confessional statement of a co‑accused, Ram Ballabh Sahni. The petitioner was not named in the FIR and had been in custody since 25‑08‑2025. He sought bail, arguing that …
The petitioner, Praveen Khatoon, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 406, 420, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly cheating the informant of Rs. 25,90,000 by promising overseas employment. The prosecution alleged that both the petitioner …
The petitioner, Sameer Singh, was arrested in connection with a murder case (S.T. No. 439 of 2025) involving the killing of an informant's father and charged under Sections 302, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was one of the co‑accused, while the …
The petitioner, Monu Kumar, who is in custody, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 304(B), 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that he murdered his wife and disposed of her body. He contended that his wife died of tuberculosis, that his confession was obtained by force, …
Baijnath Das was arrested in connection with a land‑dispute related assault alleged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 308(3), 352 and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code. He has been in custody since 17‑Nov‑2025 and sought bail, contending that the incident was a "free fight" in which both …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar, was arrested in connection with a fraud case alleging he duped an informant of approximately two crore rupees and impersonated an employee of the Food Corporation of India. He faces charges under IPC sections 406 (criminal breach of trust), 420 (cheating), 34 (common …
Vinay Pal was arrested in connection with a kidnapping and murder case (Sections 364 and 302 IPC) arising from an incident on 26 May 2022, with the FIR lodged 45 days later. The petitioner, claiming a clean antecedent, argued that the investigation was complete, a charge sheet had been filed, and no …
The petitioner, Baleshwar Mistri, a former Panchayat Sachiv, was accused under Sections 175 and 409 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly failing to furnish merit lists and certificates of teacher candidates to the Vigilance Department. He sought anticipatory bail, arguing that the alleged …
The petitioners, Sobha Manjhi and Sukhu Manjhi, applied for bail in a murder trial (Sessions Trial No. 535 of 2025) arising from a 2009 case involving alleged killings of Gopal Singh and Umesh Singh under Sections 302, 307, 324 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. They claimed false implication, lack of …
The petitioner, Sahil Kumar, was charged under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code for a robbery allegedly involving the snatching of cash from a motorcycle at gunpoint. He contended that he was falsely implicated, noting that the FIR was initially lodged against unknown persons and no …
The petitioner, Satrajeet Chaudhary, was arrested in connection with a bank dacoity case (S.Tr. No.318 of 2024) and charged under several IPC sections (399, 402, 413, 414, 212) and Arms Act sections (25(1‑B)a, 26, 35). He was not named in the FIR; his name surfaced only through the confessional …
The petitioner, Sahil Kumar, was arrested in connection with a robbery case (Section 392 IPC) where cash was allegedly snatched from an informant. He applied for bail, arguing that he was falsely implicated and that a co-accused had already been granted bail. The State opposed the bail on the ground …
Manu Singh was charged under IPC sections 323, 341, 307, 504, 506 and 34 for allegedly assaulting an informant with a lathi‑danda and iron rods. He applied for regular bail, claiming he was falsely implicated, that no specific overt act could be attributed to him, and that he has a clean antecedent. …
The petitioners, Sakaldev Thakur and Vipin Kumar Thakur, were named in an FIR for alleged offences under Sections 147, 427, 506 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, accused of obstructing government work and pelting stones at police personnel. They claimed innocence, arguing that no specific overt …
The petitioners, three sisters-in-law of a deceased woman, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 328, 302, 201 and 34 for alleged poisoning and murder of the informant's daughter on 31 May 2023. The prosecution alleged that the daughter was forcibly given …
The State of Gujarat appealed the acquittal of three accused in a murder case arising from a land dispute, while the original complainant filed a revision. The prosecution presented nine eyewitnesses and medical evidence indicating fatal head injuries caused by a stick, but the sole primary …
The State appealed the acquittal of four accused in a murder case where the victim, Roshanben, died from extensive burn injuries. The prosecution alleged that the accused conspired to set the victim on fire using kerosene, relying on two dying declarations, the crime‑scene panchnama, and medical …
The Allahabad High Court heard an appeal by Rizwan against his conviction under Section 25 of the Arms Act and Section 307 of the IPC for allegedly firing at a police party on 22 January 1999. The prosecution’s case rested solely on the testimony of police officers, with no independent witnesses, no …
The petitioner, Sharik Khan, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking to set aside the discharge orders dated 09.11.2022 by the Chief Judicial Magistrate and 26.09.2025 by the Additional Sessions Judge in a criminal case involving alleged offences under Sections 420, 468, 471 and 120‑B IPC. The …
The appellant, Rakesh Babu alias Ramesh, was acquitted of charges under Sections 147, 148, 307/149, 326/149 and 120‑B IPC in Sessions Trial No. 581 of 2003, while co‑accused were convicted. After the judgment, he applied under Section 452 of the CrPC for the release of a licensed gun seized as a …
The appellant, Smt. Majeedan, appealed an acquittal of six accused under Sections 366, 504 and 506 IPC for allegedly abducting and intoxicating her daughter, threatening her, and forcing a marriage. The prosecution alleged the accused took the girl, administered an intoxicant, and threatened her, …
The applicant, Advocate Lallan Chaubey, sought to quash the criminal proceedings (CrPC Case No.1083 of 2014) and stay a non‑bailable warrant issued against him, invoking Section 528 of the BNSS (the modern equivalent of Section 482 CrPC). He argued that the charge‑sheet against him under IPC 406 …
Petitioner Sanjay Yadav, the father‑in‑law of a deceased woman, sought anticipatory bail in a dowry‑death case filed under Sections 304B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He asserted that he had no involvement in the family affairs, maintained a clean record, and that the deceased had committed …
The petitioner, a child of approximately ten years, was accused of raping and murdering a 1 year 8 months old girl and was denied bail by the Additional Sessions Judge and the Juvenile Justice Board. The revision petition argued that the evidence was insufficient, the confession was made under …
The petitioner, Gulshan Kumar, sought regular bail in a case registered under section 304 of the Indian Penal Code concerning the alleged theft of a golden chain. The prosecution alleged that a boy snatched the chain from a woman, and a gold-like chain was later recovered from the petitioner’s …
The petitioner, Bali Nut, was taken into custody after his anticipatory bail was cancelled when a criminal antecedent of more than two cases was discovered. He subsequently filed a regular bail application (Cr. Misc. No.88817 of 2025) which was initially rejected, with the court directing him to …
Fekan Sahni was arrested in connection with a case involving the seizure of 432 litres of liquor and charged under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, that no incriminating …
Mukesh Sahani applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving multiple serious offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act. The FIR alleged that two persons, Pankaj and Bhutkun, were killed in an altercation, with the petitioner purportedly shooting Bhutkun. The petitioner’s counsel …
The petitioner, Brajesh Kumar, was charged under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly keeping the motorcycle used in a murder. The prosecution alleged that the deceased was killed by hired criminals at the behest of Vinay Kumar Singh, and the …
Manu Kumar was convicted by a Special POCSO Court for rape under Section 376D IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act based solely on the victim’s testimony. On appeal, the Patna High Court examined the victim’s age, noting that she declared herself 18 years old and a medical opinion placed her …
The petitioner, Md. Wakil Alam Ansari, a junior engineer in the Electricity Department, was charged under IPC sections 323, 379, 504 and 506 for allegedly demanding a bribe, assaulting the complainant and stealing copper wires. He contended that the complaint was filed in retaliation for an FIR he …
Petitioner Rajendra Kamal filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a Judicial Magistrate's order dated 30-06-2017 that had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner argued that …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous petition seeking transfer of a case (Taraiya PS Case No. 237 of 2022) involving offences under Sections 498(A), 341, 323, 325, 379, 354/34 of the IPC and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act from the Court of ACJM‑I, Saran (Chapra) to the Court of CJM, …
Isteyaque Khan filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 01‑06‑2018 of the SDJM Motihari, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner argued …
The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar Dubey, was arrested in connection with a dowry‑related complaint (Case No. 1260 of 2022) alleging mental and physical cruelty under multiple IPC sections and Section 5 of the Anaitik Vyapar Adhiniam. The complaint was filed on 21‑12‑2022, nine months after the alleged …
The petitioner, Alok Kumar, was arrested on 29 March 2023 in connection with a murder that allegedly took place in a court premises, and is charged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 20(1‑b)a, 26, 35 and 27 of the Arms Act. He filed a second bail …
The petitioner, Nausad Alam, was charged under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act for the murder of a man whose wife allegedly conspired with the petitioner. The pistol used in the crime was recovered from a third person, Parwez Alam, and the petitioner has been in …
The petitioner, Md Asgar @ Jamshed Naddaf, was charged under Sections 354, 354A, 363, 366A, 376(2)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4 and 8 of the POCSO Act in PS Singhwara Case No. 44 of 2023. He filed a second application for regular bail, arguing that the trial was underway. The court …
Rahul Kumar was arrested in connection with a case registered under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code (dacoity) and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly shooting at an informant and committing loot. He made a self‑inculpatory statement and has been in custody since 28‑11‑2023. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Chhotu Kumar, sought regular bail in a criminal case (PS Case No. 1002 of 2022) for alleged offences under Sections 363 and 365 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner argued that all witnesses had already been examined in trial, contending that there was no longer a need for his …
The petitioner, Vikas Ranjan, filed an application seeking to quash the order dated 11‑01‑2024 of the Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, which had taken cognizance of offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 498A/34 and D.P. Act sections 3 and 4. The petitioner produced a Family …
Shambhu Sahani was charged under Sections 364 and 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly killing a chowkidar who opposed their illegal activities in a river. The petitioner applied for regular bail for the second time after his earlier bail plea was rejected. The State opposed the bail, …
Shahil Kumar, who operated a call centre and allegedly defrauded victims by persuading them to install the AnyDesk application and siphoning funds, was charged under IPC sections 419, 420, 468, 120B and IT Act sections 66(c) and 66(d). He had previously applied for regular bail, which was denied by …
The petitioners Shankar Singh and Pintu Singh sought regular bail in two criminal miscellaneous applications arising from PS Belaganj Case No. 195 of 2024, which involved offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 386 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 27, 25(1‑b), 26, 25 of the Arms Act. Both …
The petitioner, Roushan Mahto, was charged under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code in PS Chauri Case No. 57 of 2023. He filed a second bail application after an earlier bail denial on 1 October 2024. Counsel argued that the trial was nearing its conclusion with all witnesses examined, warranting …
The petitioners, Kailash Prasad Singh and Neelam Devi, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition challenging an order dated 19‑11‑2017 of the Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pupri, which had taken cognizance of offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 504, 427 and 436/34. The petitioners contended …
The petitioners filed a petition in the Patna High Court seeking to quash an order dated 12 March 2018 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑I, Danapur, which had taken cognizance of offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 302, 120‑B and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The …
The petitioner, Rajiv Kumar Mishra, applied for regular bail in a case involving kidnapping, kidnapping for ransom, murder and concealment of evidence under IPC sections 363, 364, 302, 201 and 34. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and co‑accused killed the deceased, motivated by a love …
Petitioners Rahul Kumar and Vikash Kumar were charged under IPC sections 394 (dacoity) and 302 (murder) and Arms Act section 27. Their earlier bail application was rejected, but they argued that no material (motorcycle or number plate) was recovered from them, the only recovery being from a …
The petitioners, Nishant Kumar Patel and Awadh Kishore Paswan, police officers, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 13-03-2018 of the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jamui, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 417 and 465 …
The petitioners, Umashankar Sahani and Banti Kumar, were charged under IPC sections 489A, 489B, 489C (counterfeiting) and 34 (common intention) in a case registered on 29.03.2024. Their earlier bail applications were rejected, and one of them had counterfeit notes recovered while the other did not. …
The petitioner, Punam Devi, was charged under Section 363A of the Indian Penal Code for kidnapping a three‑year‑old boy, who was later recovered from her. The prosecution alleged that she had arranged the kidnapping and purchased the child from a co‑accused for Rs 50,000. The petitioner applied for …
Rohit Kumar was charged under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code for robbing a motorcycle and a mobile phone at gunpoint. The stolen motorcycle was later recovered from his residence and he has been in custody since 29‑04‑2024. He filed a second regular bail application after an earlier denial. …
