Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
17481 judgments · newest first · showing 9201–9400
The petitioners, Jhingan Sahani and Tetari Devi, were implicated in a 2015 case alleging multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code, including assault and robbery. They applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence, a 22‑day delay in filing the FIR, and no prior criminal record. The State …
The petitioner, Sanjay Prasad, husband of Ruby Devi, was arrested in a complaint alleging dowry harassment under IPC sections 498A, 379/34 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. The State and the wife opposed his bail, contending that he, with his family, had assaulted and evicted her for …
The appellant, Ankit Kumar, appealed against the denial of bail in a murder‑conspiracy case (Sections 302, 120(B)/34 IPC and Section 27 Arms Act) where the informant’s son was killed. The prosecution alleged that the appellant conspired with co‑accused and acted as a ‘liner’, relying on confessional …
Vivek Kumar was arrested in connection with a dacoity alleged under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code, involving theft of gold, silver ornaments and cash, and firearm injuries. He was not named in the FIR and has been in custody since 12‑08‑2024, with the prosecution’s case relying solely on a …
Mashum Khan, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case registered under sections 302 and 341 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act, where the FIR alleged that co‑accused Imtiyaz Khan and Amir Khan shot dead the father of an informant. The petitioner was not named in the FIR, and the …
Vipin Bihari, the owner of a truck from which 1760 liters of spirit were recovered, filed a pre‑arrest bail petition alleging that he had sold the truck and had no possession of the contraband. He asserted innocence, lack of criminal antecedents, and that no incriminating material was found on him. …
Sipahi Mahto, convicted under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment in 2013, has served over 14 years of actual custody. He filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Superintendent of Special Central Jail, Bhagalpur, to forward his case for permanent remission and premature …
The petitioner, Sunil Kumar Gupta, husband of Bina Devi, was arrested in a dowry harassment case filed under sections 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that he and co‑accused demanded Rs.2 lakh as dowry, assaulted and tortured …
The petitioner, Rajan Pandit, was arrested in connection with a violent incident in which multiple parties, including co‑accused Meena Devi and Raju Pandit, allegedly assaulted the deceased and each other. The deceased later died of septicemia 36 days after the incident. The petitioner contended …
The petitioner, Pravesh Sahani, was arrested in connection with a murder case (IPC Sections 302 and 34) arising from an altercation on 16‑03‑2024 that led to the death of the informant’s son. The FIR attributes the fatal assault solely to co‑accused Babloo Sahani, while the petitioner was present …
The petition filed by Upendra Paswan sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case (PS case No.59/2024) where he was accused of offences under various IPC sections for allegedly assaulting an informant and stealing a gold ring. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, asserting that …
The petitioner, Binit Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged robbery of an informant sleeping in his truck. The allegation states that the accused dragged the informant out, assaulted him, and stole Rs.3500 and an ATM card. The …
The petitioner, Shambhu Das, was arrested in connection with a case registered under multiple IPC sections including 420, 467, 468, 406, 376, 323, 504 and 506, alleging that he raped a married woman under the pretext of marriage. The petitioner claimed innocence, asserting that the sexual …
Nitish Kumar was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged kidnapping, theft, murder, concealment of evidence and criminal conspiracy, as well as an alleged offence under the SC/ST Act. The exclusive special judge denied his bail application. The appellant contended that there was no …
Mukesh Kumar petitioned the Patna High Court for bail after a complaint was lodged against him under IPC sections 323, 498A, 504, 506, 34 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4, alleging that he and his family demanded dowry, tortured his wife Rinku Kumari and evicted her from their matrimonial …
The petitioner, Sanjay Chaudhary, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Sections 302 and 34 IPC) and has been in custody since 7 April 2022. He alleged that the informant who lodged the FIR was not an eye‑witness and that the complaint was motivated by a family property dispute, as the …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, was named in FIR No.120 of 2022 for alleged offences including rioting, assault, and possession of arms, alleged to have occurred on a college campus where he and others assaulted students, staff and obstructed public servants. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming …
The appellant, Rajesh Kumar, was charged with murder, conspiracy (IPC §§302, 120(B)/34) and illegal possession of arms (Arms Act §27) for allegedly orchestrating the killing of the informant's son. He sought bail, claiming innocence and that his name surfaced only through a co-accused's confessional …
The petitioners, Dharmendra Kumar Mandal and Geeta Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging offences under Sections 341, 323, 308, 354, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that they, along with co‑accused, assaulted an informant with a lathi and a …
The petitioner, Prakash Jha, was charged with murder (IPC s.302), criminal conspiracy (IPC s.120B) and illegal possession of a firearm (Arms Act s.27) after his husband was shot dead. The informant, the deceased's wife, alleged that a colleague, Raj Kamal Thakur, had a motive to kill her husband and …
The petitioner, Ankit Kumar, was implicated in a case involving the illegal manufacture and sale of liquor, with offences under Sections 272, 273, 308/34 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The prosecution recovered 299.64 litres of illicit liquor from the premises …
The petitioner, Ajit Mahto, was arrested in connection with a robbery alleged to have taken place at a jewelry shop, charged under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He was not named in the FIR and has been in custody since 18 June 2025. The sole basis for the …
Ankit Kumar was arrested in connection with a kidnapping and alleged murder under Sections 364 and 120B of the IPC. He sought bail, contending that his name appeared only through a co‑accused's confessional statement and that the victim did not identify him, with no other incriminating material. The …
The petitioner, Md. Arif, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a complaint alleging offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 504, 379, 498A and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4, relating to alleged cruelty, harassment and dowry demands after the complainant's marriage. The prosecution …
Petitioner Dipu Paswan applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR alleged he assaulted Umesh Paswan with a lathi, invoking IPC sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 506/34. The petitioner claimed innocence, asserted that the injury was simple, and highlighted his clean antecedent. The State opposed the …
The petitioners, Biplab Halder and Shyamal Biswas, sought anticipatory bail in a case (Baisi PS No.257/2021) involving alleged offences under IPC sections 272 and 273 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act sections 30(a), 41 and 47. The prosecution alleged that 630 litres of illicit liquor were …
The petitioner, Shashi Ranjan, was arrested in connection with a bank dacoity and the murder of two constables, alleged under IPC Section 396 and Arms Act Section 27. He was not named in the FIR; his name emerged from a co-accused's confessional statement, and no incriminating material directly …
The appellant Guddu Miyan was convicted for murder, attempt to murder and illegal possession of a firearm arising from a shooting on 22 November 2011 that killed Dharmendra Kumar and injured Amit Kumar. The prosecution case relied on the statements of the informant (PW‑8) and the injured eyewitness …
The petitioner, Vinit Singh, was implicated in an FIR alleging offences under Sections 376 and 313 of the Indian Penal Code, stemming from a relationship that began in 2015 and allegedly involved a false promise of marriage. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting a clean record, his age of …
Vinod Yadav was arrested in connection with a murder case (Sursand P.S. Case No.451 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 302, 363, 201 and 120‑B read with 34 of the IPC. He has been in custody since 22‑04‑2025. The police later submitted a closure report against him, stating that no …
The petitioner, Anurak Kumar Roy, was arrested in connection with a violent incident in Khanpur where a child was injured and a co‑accused, Sandeep Saurabh, was seen with a weapon. The FIR originally charged the petitioner under IPC sections 307 (attempt to murder) and 120 (criminal conspiracy) and …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, was implicated in a 2018 case (PS No.115) for alleged offences under Sections 420, 120(B) and 379 of the Indian Penal Code, accused of being a member of the ‘Chehra Pahchano Inam Pao’ gang. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and that the charges were …
The petitioner, Arsad Ali, was named in an FIR alleging murder under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, based on the informant's claim that he participated in the abduction and killing of her husband. The petitioner contended that he was innocent, the FIR was lodged after an …
Vikram Kumar sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a murder case (IPC Sections 302, 201/34) based on a co-accused's confession. The FIR does not name him; the only material against him is that he was in telephone contact with the co-accused, Ashok Kumar, at the time of …
The petitioner, Bhola Sah, was implicated in a violent incident arising from a land dispute, alleged to have beaten an informant with an iron rod. He faces multiple IPC charges including sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 307, 354, 379, 504 and 506. The petitioner sought pre‑arrest bail, contending a …
The petitioner, Vishal Kumar, was alleged to have participated in a mob protest against the Agnipath Scheme, during which vehicles were damaged and police injured, leading to charges under numerous IPC sections and the Damage of Public Property Act. He contended that he was not named in the FIR and …
Shivaji Singh applied for pre‑arrest bail after being implicated in a kidnapping case involving the minor sister of an informant. The prosecution alleged that Singh, along with co‑accused, abducted the child, and the victim’s statement recorded under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code …
The petitioners, Aarti Kumari, Visheswar Rai and Ram Singh Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging they assaulted police officers during an attempt to apprehend accused persons in Raghopur. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, along with others, brutally attacked the …
The petitioners, who were caretakers of a construction project, feared arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code for alleged fraud, assault, and theft. The prosecution alleged that the accused formed a construction company, received Rs.81.30 lacs from a …
Anupam Giri, fearing arrest in a criminal case (PS No.787 of 2017) involving offences under Sections 427 and 436 of the Indian Penal Code, filed an anticipatory bail application in 2026, nine years after the case was registered. The State opposed the application, highlighting the inordinate delay …
The petitioners, who were caretakers of a construction project, feared arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code for alleged fraud, assault, and theft. The prosecution alleged that the accused formed a construction company, received Rs.81.30 lacs from a …
Petitioner Rinki Kumari was implicated in a 2015 FIR alleging assault and murder of a woman, with the prosecution alleging she instigated her husband Pappu Paswan to commit the crime. The petition sought bail, arguing she had no direct involvement, no specific allegation of an overt act, and a clean …
The petitioner, Perwez Khan, feared arrest in a case involving numerous IPC offences and a provision of the Bihar Control of Use and Play of Loudspeaker Act, arising from a disturbance during a Durga immersion procession near a mosque. He asserted a clean antecedent and claimed false implication by …
The petitioner, Sunita Devi, sought bail in a dowry harassment case where she is alleged to be the gotini of the victim. The charges include offences under sections 498A and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner argued that the allegations were …
The petitioners, Sonu Singh, Monu Singh, Milan Singh and Shubham Singh, were implicated in an FIR alleging assault in the context of a long-standing land dispute, with charges under sections 341, 323, 324, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. They contended that the allegations were vague, no …
Petitioner Raj Kumar Sahni sought anticipatory bail after the police recovered 33.5 liters of foreign liquor from his residence, alleging offences under IPC sections 272, 273 and 34 and several provisions of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating no …
Vinay Kumar, the grandson of the informant, filed an application to quash the order dated 14‑05‑2010 of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, which had taken cognizance of alleged cheating, criminal breach of trust and forgery (IPC §§419, 420, 406, 467, 468, 471) against him and others. The …
The petitioner, Mithlesh Sharma, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Kharik P.S. Case No. 98 of 2022) involving alleged offences of murder, attempt to murder, criminal conspiracy and illegal possession of arms. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and co‑accused fired at the …
Shivan Yadav was arrested in connection with an alleged assault on an informant who had seized a tractor used in illegal sand mining. The prosecution alleged that Yadav, along with others, attacked the informant and police with lathis, dandas and bricks, leading to simple injuries. Yadav applied for …
Avinash Kumar was charged under multiple serious offences, including sections 342, 326, 307, 302, 120B of the IPC, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 3(2)(v)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. He had been in judicial custody since July 2024 and had previously applied for bail, …
The petitioner, Sukhari Raut, sought bail in a case registered under Section 414 IPC and Sections 8C, 20(b)(ii)(C) and 29 of the NDPS Act, where 2 kg of charas, mobile phones and cash were seized from a vehicle in which he was present. He contended that he was neither the owner nor the driver of the …
The appellant, Prabhu Yadav, was charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for serious offences including murder, attempt to murder and offences against the person. His bail application was rejected by the …
The petitioner, Bhuplal Yadav, was arrested in connection with a 2020 incident alleged to involve rioting, assault, and murder under IPC Sections 147, 148, 149, 324 and 302. He applied for regular bail, claiming he was falsely implicated and that the FIR contains only vague, omnibus allegations. The …
Vishal Sah @ Vishal Paswan was arrested in connection with a 2014 case alleging that a Maoist‑led explosive attack derailed a goods train, charging him under multiple sections of the IPC, the Explosive Substances Act, the Prevention of Damage of Public Property Act, the Unlawful Activities …
Petitioners Pramod Yadav and Shila Devi filed a petition under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code seeking to quash the order dated 07.05.2016 that had taken cognizance of the offence and issued summons against them. They argued that the criminal proceeding had become infructuous and therefore the …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, was implicated in a FIR alleging offences under sections 331(4), 191(3), 115(2), 126(2), 109 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act, arising from an incident where miscreants attacked an informant’s family and shot the informant’s son. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Md. Parvej, was charged under IPC sections 302 and 34 and Arms Act section 27 for the alleged murder of an informant's son on 30-12-2022. He applied for regular bail, arguing that the FIR was filed three days after the incident, the informant’s testimony was inconsistent, and the …
Vinaka Devi applied for bail in a murder case (Section 302/34 IPC) arising from an incident where she and others allegedly killed an informant's daughter. The prosecution alleged that she participated in pressing the victim's neck, while the defense argued she was falsely implicated, citing lack of …
Gulshan Yadav was arrested in connection with a 2016 incident where extremists demanded a levy for a railway bridge construction, burned four vehicles and assaulted workers, naming 63 accused including the petitioner. The petitioner filed a bail application, asserting that the FIR contains no …
Petitioners Biru Kumar and Rajdhari Ram were accused in a 2014 case involving a goods‑train derailment allegedly caused by Maoist‑planted explosives, and were charged under multiple serious provisions of the IPC, Explosive Substances Act, Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, UAPA, Criminal …
M/s Siyaram Construction, through its partner Amit Kumar, filed a writ petition challenging a Show Cause Notice dated 17‑10‑2022 and a subsequent black‑listing order dated 13‑04‑2023 issued by officials of the Bihar Minor Irrigation Department under the Bihar Contractors Registration Rules, 2007. …
The petitioner, who is the original complainant, is on trial for murder under IPC s.302 and sought CCTV footage of the Mundra Police Station for his defence. He filed an application (Exhibit‑448) under CrPC s.311 which the trial court initially allowed, but the DVR was found to have no backup; the …
The petitioners, who were the original accused, filed a Special Criminal Application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash FIR No. 11191045200064 (2020) that alleged offences under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The original …
On 6 April 1984, Santosh Kumar allegedly fired a pistol at Kishan Bihari, causing injuries that were medically confirmed as caused by a firearm. The trial court convicted Kumar under Section 324 of the IPC and sentenced him to two years of rigorous imprisonment. Kumar appealed, not contesting the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sameer, who is charged under Sections 363 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for an alleged offence involving a victim. The applicant’s counsel argued that the victim is a major, consented to the encounter, and …
The petitioner, Md. Farooque, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Sikty P.S. Case No.100 of 2024) involving multiple IPC offences arising from a land dispute that escalated into a violent clash over cattle, injuring seven persons. The petitioner argued that the FIR did not …
The petitioners, five residents of Mohanpur, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with FIR No.50 of 2025 alleging offences under sections 191(2), 190, 109, 132, 121(i), 121(2), 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, during a police …
Petitioner Pradip Kumar Gupta feared arrest in connection with PS Nayagaon Case No. 16 of 2019, where offences under IPC sections 420, 385, 506 and 504 read with section 34 were registered. He filed an anticipatory bail application, seeking liberty to surrender and obtain bail. The Court, after …
The petitioner, Nagendra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a 2022 case (PS Khusrupur Case No. 367) involving alleged offences under IPC sections 399 and 402 and the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case was based on statements of three co‑accused who named the petitioner, and a pistol was …
The petitioners, three brothers from Rohtas district, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a FIR (Rajpur PS Case No. 146 of 2024) that alleged their involvement in violent clashes and listed multiple IPC offences. The prosecution alleged that the accused attacked police and were identified by …
The petitioner, Kalyan Patel, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in two murder FIRs (Sections 302, 120(B) IPC) concerning the hanging deaths of a girl and a boy. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner lured the victims, while the petitioner argued the deaths were a suicide pact due …
The petitioners, three brothers from Nalanda, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging they entered a house with weapons and assaulted the occupants, causing head injuries. The prosecution alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and section 76 of the Bihar …
The petitioner, Ram Vinay Sharma, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a police case (No.193/2023) involving offences under Sections 448, 341, 323, 337, 307, 379, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner participated in assault, theft and other violent …
The petitioner, Shyambabu Rai, sought bail in a case (PS Kotwa Case No. 438 of 2022) where he was accused under Sections 411, 467, 468, 471, 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly punching the engine of a stolen bike and preparing duplicate documents. The prosecution’s case relied mainly …
The petitioner, Randhir Yadav, was named in a 2016 FIR (Sirdala PS Case No. 264) for a range of offences under the Indian Penal Code, the Arms Act and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming he resides in another district and was unaware of the …
The petitioners, Chhahku Sharma and Mangal Sharma, feared arrest in a 2012 case involving offences under IPC sections 447, 341, 323, 504 and 34. They had been granted regular bail by the CJM, Madhepura on 16 July 2012, after which a charge‑sheet under section 307 IPC was filed and cognizance taken …
The petitioner, husband of the deceased woman, applied for regular bail in a case registered under sections 304B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging dowry‑related cruelty and murder. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was involved in the death of his wife, while the petitioner claimed …
Pawan Kumar Thakur applied for bail after being implicated in a theft case (IPC Sec. 380) based on an informant’s claim that he, as her husband, stole her mobile, cash and gold. The petitioner contested the allegation, asserting that the informant’s claim of marriage was false and that she was …
Petitioner Jafir Ahmad applied for bail in a criminal case (Gaunaha P.S. Case No. 77 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 341, 323, 354B, 379, 498A, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The allegations relate to dowry demands, alleged torture, and …
The petitioner, Kumar Gaurav Roy, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the IPC. The FIR was filed after a vigilance inquiry into his appointment as a teacher without registration under an amnesty scheme, …
The petitioner, Jitendra Prasad, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code relating to alleged fraud and forgery. The prosecution alleged that the accused attempted to withdraw Rs.20,000 and had previously withdrawn Rs.10,000 …
The petitioner, Sonu Devi, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR alleged that she, along with others, entered the informant’s land, abused, assaulted, and attempted to outrage the informant’s modesty. She contended that she is the rightful landowner and the case was fabricated to facilitate a land …
The petitioners, Ramji Manjhi, Budhu Manjhi and Jagar Nath Singh, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered in 2017 under sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that they were being framed for forging documents to claim land belonging to Sukhan Dushadh’s …
The petitioner, Vibhishan Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 395 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code for theft of cash and mobile phones. The FIR described an armed robbery by unknown miscreants, and the petitioner’s name was not originally mentioned …
Gyanti Devi and Lalita Devi applied for anticipatory bail after being named in a FIR alleging involvement in a murder under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that co‑accused Rajan Ray and Bhola Ray assaulted an informant, causing his death, but the petitioners …
The petitioners, a group of relatives from Vaishali district, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case registered under sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 472 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code concerning an alleged fraudulent sale of land. The prosecution alleged that Binod Mahto …
The petitioner, Chandeshwari Kamat, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS 110 of 2021) alleging offences under Sections 409 and 201 of the IPC for allegedly failing to deposit case records for four years after his posting. The prosecution contended that the omission amounted to …
The petitioner, Md. Imajuddin, was arrested in connection with a murder case (PS Kodhobari Case No. 32 of 2023) under sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleges that the sister of an informant, who was married to the petitioner, was tortured and killed, while the …
The petitioner, Babua Sah, aged about 57, was named in an FIR relating to a land dispute where he was alleged to have assaulted an informant with a lathi. He sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with multiple IPC …
Mithun Rai sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No.19/2023) involving alleged offences under Sections 147, 149, 323, 504, 302 and 506 IPC, where he was accused of assaulting an informant’s family and causing the death of the informant’s father by pressing his testicles. The …
Pappu Sah applied for bail in a murder case (Kuchaikot P.S. Case No. 110 of 2025) where he is accused under IPC Sections 126(2), 115(2), 108 and 3(5) B.N.S. for allegedly killing the informant's daughter. The petitioner contended that he is the husband of the deceased, was falsely implicated, and …
The petitioners, Arun Patel and his wife Kiran Devi, filed an anticipatory bail application in a case registered under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109(1), 303(2), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. for alleged assault and theft. Arun Patel withdrew his application after being arrested, and the court dismissed …
The petitioner, Praveen Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case (Kesariya P.S. Case No. 251 of 2023) involving offences under several IPC sections including assault, robbery and criminal intimidation. The prosecution alleges that Kumar, along with others, assaulted an …
The petitioners, Bibi Hazra, Md. Siraj Uddin and Md. Shohrab Raja, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a complaint (No. 264 of 2024) alleging offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 120(B), 504 and 506 for allegedly executing a forged sale deed. They contended that the matter was a civil …
Ram Vilash Chaupal was arrested in connection with a case (PS 507 of 2020) alleging offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, including murder, robbery and assault, stemming from a fight between two families. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated due to a trivial …
The petitioners, Saroj Devi and Indu Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑death case (Sections 304B and 34 IPC) concerning the death of their sister‑in‑law. The prosecution alleged that the deceased was harassed for dowry and subsequently killed, while the petitioners claimed she …
The petitioner, Pappu Kumar, was implicated in a case alleging purchase of a stolen motorcycle, with charges under Sections 356, 379 and later 411 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution’s case relied primarily on the confessional statement of a co-accused, while no stolen article was found in the …
The petitioner, Sunil Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Buxar Town PS Case No.416 of 2025) involving alleged impersonation in a constable recruitment exam. The FIR named sections 319(2), 318(4), 336(3), 340(2), 341(1) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code, but did not name the …
The petitioner, Ravindra Kumar, sought bail in a case registered under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged dacoity involving the theft of a truck and its contents. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was part of a group that overpowered the informant's truck and seized the …
The petitioner, Awadhesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving alleged cheque fraud and related offences under Sections 467, 468, 471, 409 and 420 of the IPC. The FIR alleged that Rs. 4,30,000 was illegally withdrawn and later credited to the informant’s account, …
Robin Paswan was arrested in connection with a theft, robbery and extortion case (IPC §§ 461, 379, 411) involving the loss of 65‑70 mobile phones, cash of Rs.20,000 and repairing articles worth Rs.15,000 from a shop. The prosecution’s case relied solely on the confessional statement of a co‑accused, …
The petitioner, Pappu Kumar, was implicated in a 2016 murder case (No.284) under sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act. He contended that he was not named in the FIR and was only alleged to have fed the accused after the killing. The petitioner had been in …
Petitioner Harinath Mishra was implicated in a criminal case (Laheriyasarai PS Case No. 614 of 2023) for alleged offences under Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC, accused of conspiring to defraud an informant of Rs. 20,00,000. He contended that he was innocent, explaining that he had sold land to a …
Manish Pandey applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged looting of cash and valuables from an informant's house. The FIR named several accused, and Pandey's name surfaced in a co‑accused's confessional statement, …
Petitioner Kamlawati Devi sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a criminal case (Bhore P.S. Case No. 368 of 2022) involving alleged forgery, property fraud, and offences under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that she, along with …
The petitioners, Gango Ray and Kongresh Ray, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging looting of 16 quintals of wheat at gunpoint and related offences under the IPC and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged offences including robbery, assault, criminal intimidation …
The petitioner, Shashi Bhushan Kumar Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 147, 341, 504, 323, 325, 308 and 354(A)/34 relating to an alleged assault on an informant with an iron rod and lathi on 17 October 2022. The FIR names eight accused, but the …
The petitioners, Raju Kumar Yadav and Vijay Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a violent incident at Chakkadih village, where the prosecution alleged they assaulted an informant with iron rods and caused serious injuries. The FIR listed offences under several sections of the …
The petitioner, Sintu Yadav, was arrested in connection with a 2020 murder case (Gopalpur PS Case No. 114) alleged under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR named seven accused, but the petitioner's counsel argued that no specific allegation was made …
The petitioner, Randhir Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case alleging kidnapping, criminal intimidation, wrongful confinement and criminal conspiracy under Sections 363, 366(A), 504 and 120(B) r/w 34 of the IPC. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and co‑accused enticed a …
The petitioners, Sanjit Kumar and Kundan Kumar, brothers‑in‑law of the informant, were charged under sections 498A, 323, 341, 504, 506, 380, 34 of the IPC and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for allegedly extorting a dowry of Rs 1 lakh and subjecting the informant to physical and …
The petitioner, Piyare @ Saddam Hussain, sought anticipatory bail in a case (Kochadhaman P.S. Case No. 240/2023) alleging offences under Sections 414 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code relating to a stolen motorcycle. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner had sold the motorcycle to Maksood Alam, …
The petitioners, Abhishek Kumar and Bijay Yadav, were implicated in a case registered under IPC Section 414 and several provisions of the Arms Act following the recovery of illegal firearms from a co-accused's house. They applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and arguing that the only …
The petitioners, Sunil Kumar and Ganesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a complaint alleging they acted as middlemen in a land transaction and committed offences under Sections 406, 420, 415, 416, 467 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code. The complainant claimed she paid full …
The petitioner, Bicky Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a robbery case under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR described an assault and theft of jewellery, a mobile phone and cash by three unknown persons, but the petitioner’s name does not …
Manoranjan Kumar, chairman of Mathai PACS, was arrested in a case alleging misappropriation of paddy procured under the Bihar State Food Corporation scheme and charged under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471. The prosecution claimed that only part of the procured paddy was supplied to the …
The petitioners, Jainath Kumar and Shyam Babu Ray, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022. They contended that they were not arrested on the spot, …
The petitioner, Md. Jahir, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging possession of 796.8 litres of liquor recovered from a Mahindra pick‑up, with charges under IPC sections 272 and 273 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 sections 30(a), 36 and 41. He contended he had a …
The petitioner, Santosh Kumar, was arrested in connection with a robbery (Section 392 IPC) alleged to have occurred on 27 May 2024, during which cash, a mobile phone, and vehicle keys were stolen. He has been in custody since the incident and claims false implication, stating that his name was …
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, was arrested in connection with a robbery under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code, wherein the alleged victim was allegedly robbed of cash and a motorcycle at gunpoint. He has been in custody since 12 December 2023 without being produced for a T.I. parade, although …
The petitioner, Kaushal Kumar Thakur, was implicated in a liquor seizure case (126 litres recovered from a motorcycle) and charged under IPC sections 272, 273, 414/34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that his name appeared only because an apprehended person …
The petitioner, Lal Mohammad Miyan, filed an anticipatory bail application in connection with a criminal case (PS Case No. 105 of 2025) under Sections 190, 191(2) and 191(3) of the Indian Penal Code. Earlier, a withdrawal petition had been filed and subsequently withdrawn before the Additional …
The petitioner, Dhiraj Kumar, was arrested in June 2023 for alleged possession of 1.610 kg of charas-like substance, a country-made pistol with live cartridges, and a mobile phone. He sought bail, claiming innocence, lack of a forensic report, and that the seized items did not belong to him. The …
The petitioners, Kapil Yadav and Aditya Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case arising from a land dispute where they were accused of assaulting a woman and her husband under IPC sections 341, 323, 308, 504 and 34. They contended that the alleged assault on the husband was …
Sunita Kumari, a teacher appointed in 2010, was implicated in a case (Bathnaha P.S. Case No. 69 of 2023) for allegedly producing a forged intermediate mark‑sheet to obtain her appointment, attracting charges under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120 B. Anticipating arrest, she applied for …
The petitioner, Bindul Yadav, was implicated in a case concerning the disappearance and presumed murder of a hospital patient’s son, alleged under IPC sections 363, 364, 365, 120(B), 302 and 201/34. The prosecution’s case rests on the presence of the accused near the hospital and a prior enmity, …
Chandan Kumar was implicated in a robbery case (Section 392 IPC) where two assailants, at gun‑point, allegedly snatched Rs 64,470. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, that no incriminating material or identification parade was conducted, and that the …
Munna Sah was arrested in a 2014 robbery case alleged under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code, involving the hijacking of a truck and assault on the driver. The prosecution’s case is that a group of four miscreants committed the robbery on 17 October 2014 and fled, leaving the victims …
The petitioner, Rooplal Mahto, was arrested in connection with a robbery alleged to have occurred on 10 February 2024, for which sections 392, 34 and later 395 of the Indian Penal Code were invoked. He contended that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and that his alleged involvement …
Vikash Kumar applied for bail in a case registered under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging robbery and shooting. The prosecution alleged that three miscreants, including the petitioner, intercepted and robbed an informant, causing injuries. The petitioner …
Manu Kumar petitioned for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a robbery case (Section 392 IPC) where he alleges he was falsely implicated. The FIR named unknown persons; his name surfaced only from a co-accused’s confessional statement in a separate case. He claims innocence and points to his lack …
The petitioner, Md. Shakir @ Raja, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 14 February 2017 passed by the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 498A …
The petitioners sought to quash an order dated 24 November 2017 passed by the Judicial Magistrate‑I, Katihar, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 498(A), 385/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petition argued that the matter had become …
The petitioner, Pramod Kumar, sought regular bail in a case involving multiple serious offences under the IPC and the Arms Act, arising from an incident where a newly elected MLA and his son allegedly fired at a crowd, resulting in a death. The petitioner contended he was falsely implicated and that …
Jitendra Kumar Singh filed a petition in the Patna High Court seeking to quash an order dated 30 July 2016 passed by the Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Arwal, which had taken cognizance under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner argued that the proceedings had become …
The petitioners filed a petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash an order dated 25 November 2016 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, which had taken cognizance of a complaint under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act …
The petitioner Rohit Ram filed a petition under criminal miscellaneous jurisdiction seeking to quash an order dated 01‑07‑2017 passed by the Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Nagachia, which had taken cognizance of offences under IPC sections 323, 506, 498A and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition …
The appellant, Gope Khan, was charged under several IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged assault and caste-based abuse. He applied for anticipatory bail, which was denied by the District and Additional Sessions Judge. The appellant contended that the notice was …
Bimal Kumar Jha was named in an FIR for alleged mental and physical cruelty and dowry harassment, including offences under Sections 341, 323, 498A, 504, 506 and 34 of the IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that the allegations were vague and the FIR was …
Sudhir Kumar Yadav was charged under IPC sections 379, 511, 323 and 504 and under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged theft and caste‑based verbal abuse. He applied for anticipatory bail, which was rejected by the Additional District Judge‑I cum …
The petitioners, Shashi Kant Shukla and relatives, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 07‑09‑2017 of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑IV, Saran, which had taken cognizance of a complaint under Section …
The petitioner, Shivam Vishwakarma, was implicated in a murder case (PS Case No. 33 of 2024) for allegedly supplying a country‑made pistol and live cartridge to co‑accused Gulshan Yadav, who later confessed to the murder. The petitioner argued that the informant was not an eye‑witness and that the …
Chhotu Kumar was charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting a woman, Shobha Kumari, with an iron rod and using caste-based slurs. The trial court rejected his application for anticipatory bail. Kumar …
The appellants, a group of twelve persons from Hardaspur village, were charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly abusing and assaulting children playing music on a government platform, using caste slurs, and …
Satish Kumar (Satish Yadav) was named in an FIR for alleged mental and physical cruelty under Sections 498‑A/34 of the IPC and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, stemming from a dowry demand for land and a car. The FIR was lodged 15 days after the alleged incident, and the petitioner’s counsel …
The petitioner, Tajman Ray, was arrested in connection with a case (Turkauliya P.S. Case No. 1080 of 2022) alleging offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 308, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code for assaulting an informant and his son. The petitioner contended that the incident was a "free …
The petitioners, eight residents of Pakadhi village, were named in an FIR for multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code and the POCSO Act, alleged to have assaulted the husband of an informant, causing his death, and to have outraged the modesty of the informant's daughter. The defence argued …
Madan Rai and Indu Devi were charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting the informant’s minor son, abusing her with caste slurs, and stealing jewellery. They applied for anticipatory bail, which was …
The appellant Kanhaiya Yadav appealed against his conviction under Section 323 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing a pistol at the informant and his brother. The trial court had sentenced him to one year imprisonment for the IPC offence and three years with a fine for the …
The appellant Rajeev Kumar was charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly threatening a farmer over a land dispute, including using caste-based insults. The trial court denied his prayer for anticipatory bail. The …
Rajiv Kumar, husband of the deceased daughter of an informant, was charged with dowry death and related offences under Sections 304B, 302, 201, 34 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. He had been in custody since 1 May 2025 and the charge was already framed. The petitioner applied for regular bail, …
Bina Kumari, a middle school teacher, was named in an FIR for alleged forgery of her matriculation certificate and mark‑sheet to obtain a government teaching post, facing charges under IPC sections 420, 120B, 467, 468 and 471. She contended that the original documents were genuine, that she had lost …
The petitioner, Ramesh Sahni, was implicated in a FIR alleging kidnapping of a 14‑year‑old girl and alleged illicit intercourse/marriage under Sections 363, 366A of the IPC and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 164 CrPC stated that she married the petitioner …
The petitioner, Nepali Pandit, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Suryagarha P.S. Case No. 149 of 2019) under IPC sections 302/34 and Arms Act section 27. He sought bail, arguing that the FIR lacked an eye‑witness and was based merely on prior enmity, and that the police had submitted a …
The petitioners, Sanjay Mahto and Chhotu Mahto, were named in an FIR for alleged murder of an informant's husband, originally under Sections 363, 120‑B and 34 of the IPC, later amended to include Sections 302 and 201. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners administered intoxicating liquor and …
Vikesh Kumar Singh was arrested in connection with a FIR alleging mental and physical cruelty and dowry harassment under IPC sections 341, 323, 498A, 504, 506, 34 and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner contended that the allegations were vague, the FIR was lodged two months after …
The petitioners, nine members of the Ansari family, were accused in Forbesganj P.S. Case No. 394 of 2024 of murdering the husband of an informant, allegedly by a group assault involving lathis and fists. The prosecution charged them under multiple IPC sections including 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 302, …
Vikram Kumar was named in a complaint (No. 1033C/2023) alleging offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 328, 379, 504, 498A and a provision of the Dowry Prohibition Act for alleged mental and physical cruelty linked to a dowry demand for a four‑wheeler. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the …
The petitioner, Anil Choudhary, sought bail in connection with a complaint (No. 1666/2023) alleging offences under several IPC sections and the Dowry Prohibition Act, based on alleged mental and physical cruelty for a dowry demand. Counsel for the petitioner argued that the complaint was not …
Vikash Kumar Singh was arrested in connection with a complaint alleging offences under IPC sections 323, 498A, 379, 34 and the Dowry Prohibition Act for mental and physical cruelty linked to a dowry demand for land. The petitioner argued that the complaint lacked a supporting affidavit and contained …
The petitioners, Manju Devi, Vikash Prasad and Ravi Raushan Kumar, were arrested in connection with a rape case (Sugauli PS Case No. 196 of 2024) alleging that the complainant, a married woman, was deceived into a sexual relationship under a false promise of marriage. The petitioners sought …
The petitioner, Bharat Paswan, was named in an FIR for offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 354‑B, 504/34 and Section 8 of the POCSO Act, alleged to have outraged the modesty of a minor girl and touched her cheek. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the informant, who resides with her maternal …
The petitioners, Ravindra Kumar Jaiswal and his wife Sinku Jaiswal, were named in a 2019 complaint alleging cheating under IPC sections 323, 406, 420, 504 and 34 for receiving Rs.1 lakh and failing to deliver goods. They contended that the dispute was essentially civil and that the criminal …
The petitioner, Pawan Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case alleging an attempt to rape a 17‑year‑old girl, with charges under Sections 341, 323, 354‑A, 354‑B, 504/34 of the IPC and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. The petitioner contended that the FIR was false, arising from a land‑mortgage …
The petitioner, Jayaullah, was named in an FIR for a multitude of offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act, relating to an alleged assault during a land‑dispute incident. The FIR alleged that he, along with co‑accused, used lathis and iron rods causing injuries, with an alleged …
The petitioners, Prwin Kumar Singh and Chao Shen, were named in an FIR for alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B and 34 of the IPC, accused of cheating an informant by forging a stamp‑paper agreement for the supply of mobile handsets. They contended that they had supplied handsets …
The petitioner, Amit Singh, was arrested in connection with a 2018 incident in which he allegedly fired a shot at Mukesh Gupta, causing grievous injury, and was charged under IPC sections 326, 307, 504, 506, 34 and Arms Act section 27, with a later addition of a murder charge under section 302 after …
The petitioners, four brothers, were named in an FIR for alleged forgery of a sale deed, extortion and other offences under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code. They contended that the matter was essentially a civil land dispute, as the land belonged to their grandfather, and that the alleged …
The petitioner, a developer, was charged under IPC sections 406, 420, 467, 468 and 471 for allegedly forging a share‑division deed related to a land development agreement. The original agreement required completion of construction within two and a half years, after which the landlord cancelled the …
The petitioner, Nikhil Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case involving multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code, including sections relating to kidnapping, abetment, and sexual assault. The prosecution alleged that he facilitated a co-accused in raping the victim by providing a pistol, …
Kali Yadav was arrested in connection with a violent incident on 19-12-2024 in which he and other accused entered a house, assaulted family members, looted a motorcycle and briefly kidnapped a neighbour. He is charged under IPC Sections 147, 324, 323, 395 and 504. The petitioner sought regular bail, …
The petitioner, Swami Nath Yadav, was named in an FIR for offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 324, 498A, 34 and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging mental and physical cruelty and assault with a sharp-edged weapon. The defence argued that the allegations of cruelty were vague and that …
The petitioner, Hazari Yadav, sought pre‑arrest bail after being implicated in a case alleging rape under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner forcibly took the victim to a brick kiln and had sexual intercourse with her, and …
The petitioner, Ajmeri Khatoon, sought bail in a murder case (Sections 302 and 34 IPC) alleging she was falsely implicated. She argued that the charge sheet lacked specific overt acts and that she had no prior criminal record, having been in custody since September 2023. The State opposed bail, …
Chhotu Kumar petitioned for bail in a case registered under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging he was falsely implicated through a co-accused's confessional statement and not named in the FIR. The prosecution contended that material in the case diary …
Manoj Ram was arrested in connection with a dispute over dirty wastewater, alleged to have assaulted the informant and his family with weapons, leading to grievous injuries. The FIR lists offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 354B, 447, 504, 506, 34 and later added section 307 (attempt to …
The petitioner, Dinesh Singh, was charged under Sections 395 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code for dacoity and robbery. He applied for bail after being in judicial custody since 12 January 2025. The High Court had earlier rejected regular bail, citing the gravity of the offences. The State opposed …
The petitioner, Md. Shamim, applied for bail in a case (Maheshkhunt P.S. Case No. 163 of 2023) involving alleged offences of dacoity, attempt to murder, criminal conspiracy under Sections 394, 307, 120B of the IPC and possession of arms under Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that …
The appellants, Aslam Khan, Kaushar Khatoon and Alam Mian, were charged under several IPC offences and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged assault, caste‑based abuse and damage to crops in a land‑dispute with the informant Lalan Choudhary. The Special …
Guddu Kumar appealed against the Special Judge's order rejecting his anticipatory bail under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution alleged that Kumar and others assaulted a fast‑food shop owner, used caste‑based abuse, and outraged the modesty of female family …
The petitioners—Abdul Rahman, Md Noorsid Alam and Khurshed Alam—filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case (PS‑Chhauradhano Case No. 282 of 2022) involving offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant alleged that the …
The petitioners, Vinod Prasad and his wife Malti Devi, along with their daughters Chhatiya Devi and Priyanka Kumari, sought relief from arrest in a murder case (Sections 304B/34 IPC) registered as Dhanarua P.S. Case No. 257 of 2017. The counsel for the first two petitioners withdrew the bail …
Bhim Patel applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related complaint (Case No. 519 of 2023) that alleged offences under Sections 498A, 323, 379, 406, 504, 120B of the IPC and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that Patel and others assaulted the victim to …
The petitioners, four individuals from East Champaran, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 341, 379, 307/34 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleges that they assaulted an informant and extorted Rs. 41,000. The petitioners contended …
The petitioner, Binkatesh Kumar Rai, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related assault case (Complaint No. 1200 of 2023) alleging offences under IPC sections 323, 324, 498A/34 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner assaulted the victim to …
Petitioner Ravin Mandal applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related complaint (Case No. 1929 of 2018) that alleged offences under IPC sections 341, 342, 323, 498A and 494. The prosecution alleged that he assaulted the victim to demand dowry, while the petitioner claimed innocence …
The petitioner, Sanjay Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with a criminal case (Mashrakh P.S. Case No. 322 of 2020) involving multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner assaulted a victim, causing grievous injuries, and …
Rupesh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a complaint case (No. 261C of 2024) filed under IPC sections 115(2), 109, 85, 305 and Section 3 of the DP Act. He claimed innocence and alleged false implication. The court, relying on the Supreme Court’s guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. …
The petitioners, eleven accused persons, were arrested in connection with a case registered under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes and the Indian Penal Code for assaulting an informant, his wife and brother and outraging the wife’s modesty. They claimed innocence and sought bail, …
The petitioner, Amarjit Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR (Manigachi PS Case No. 66 of 2025) was lodged alleging offences under sections 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352 and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and co‑accused assaulted the …
Roushan Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (PS Kumarkhand Case No.141 of 2024) that alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, including assault and other violent crimes. The petitioner asserted his innocence, clean antecedent and sought …
The petitioners, Bigna Devi and Juli Kumari, filed an anticipatory bail application in connection with a criminal case (Chenari P.S. Case No. 118 of 2024) involving alleged offences under Sections 498(A), 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner's counsel withdrew the application on …
The petitioner, Himanshu Kumar (alias Chandan), was accused in a dowry harassment case (Complaint No. 277 of 2024) under IPC sections 498A and 34 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and false implication. The State opposed the bail. Relying on the …
Sunny Kumar Yadav applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case involving alleged dowry‑related violence and other offences under the IPC, Dowry Prohibition Act, SC/ST (POA) Act and POCSO Act. The court observed that the dispute is essentially a private matrimonial conflict rather than a societal offence …
The petitioner, Aldip Singh, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 316(2), 318(4) and 351(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act, alleging that he merely facilitated a visa for the informant after receiving Rs. 2,00,000, and that the visa turned out to be a tourist visa …
The petitioner, Ramadhar Ram, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a complaint alleging cheating, criminal breach of trust and forgery under IPC sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and NI Act section 138. The petitioner claimed innocence and sought settlement through mediation, while the State and …
The petitioners, Md. Samru, Md. Asif and Md. Pocha, were named in an FIR for allegedly creating a ruckus at a police station, assaulting police personnel and pressurising them to release a detainee, along with 50‑60 unknown persons. They contended that the FIR did not specifically allege any overt …
The petitioner, Ziyarul Haque, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Section 498A of the IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging that the FIR was based on a matrimonial dispute involving alleged dowry harassment. The petitioner’s counsel argued that he was innocent, …
The petitioners, Pashupati Nath Dubey and Basukinath Dubey, were charged under several IPC sections for allegedly assaulting an informant, his wife and sons over a vegetable dispute. They applied for pre‑arrest bail, claiming innocence and that the allegations were fabricated. The State opposed the …
The petitioner, Ravi Shankar Sah, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code, including assault, grievous hurt, robbery and attempt to murder. The FIR alleged that he assaulted the informant's father with an iron rod, causing serious injury. The …
