Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Information Technology Act

503 judgments · newest first · showing 401–503

Sunil PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sunil Paswan was named in an FIR for alleged cyber‑related offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act, based on information obtained from co‑accused persons seized in a raid. No incriminating material was recovered from Paswan’s possession, and he maintains a …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Sonu Kumar, Ankit Kumar and Ritik Kumar, were named in an FIR for alleged cyber‑fraud and related offences under the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita and the Information Technology Act. The prosecution’s case relied on statements of co‑accused persons, but no incriminating material …

Nitish Kushwaha @ Nitish Kumar KushwahaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Nitish Kushwaha and Rahul Singh were arrested after a police raid on a Patna flat where mobile phones, ATM cards, a laptop and other items were seized, leading to charges under multiple sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances (B.N.S.) Act, 2023 and the Information Technology Act. They …

Diljan KhanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Diljan Khan, was arrested in connection with a 2022 police case alleging multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Information Technology Act, including dowry harassment, assault, and creation of a vulgar video. The informant, Najiya Pravin, claimed she was married to the …

Niladari BaruaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Niladari Barua, was arrested in a cyber‑fraud case (Cyber P.S. Case No. 344 of 2024) alleging violations of Sections 303(2), 318(4), 319(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 66(C) and 66(D) of the Information Technology Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner …

Mantu Kumar @ Mantu PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, four residents of Barith village, were arrested in connection with a cyber‑fraud case (Giriyak P.S. Case No. 336 of 2025) and have been in custody since 30 July 2025. They were charged under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, including sections 318(4), 319(2), …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The Patna High Court considered bail applications filed by four accused persons—Manish Kumar, Rohit Kumar, Anand Kumar, and Rajkrit Kumar—arising from a cyber‑fraud case (Motihari Cyber P.S. Case No. 139 of 2025) involving offences under the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology …

Ravi Kumar @ Ravishankar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ravi Kumar, was implicated in a cyber‑fraud case (Bettiah Cyber P.S. Case No. 42 of 2025) alleged to involve offences under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act. Police, acting on a tip that miscreants would collect …

Raju KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The Patna High Court considered bail applications filed by four accused persons—Mantu Kumar, Rahul Paswan, Raju Kumar and Anchal Kumar—who were arrested in connection with a Giriyak police case alleging cyber fraud and related offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Information …

Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The Patna High Court considered four bail applications filed by Manish Kumar, Rohit Kumar, Anand Kumar and Rajkrit Kumar in connection with a cyber‑fraud case (Motihari Cyber P.S. Case No. 139 of 2025) involving offences under the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act. The …

Anand KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The Patna High Court considered four bail applications filed by Manish Kumar, Rohit Kumar, Anand Kumar and Rajkrit Kumar in connection with a cyber‑fraud case (Motihari Cyber P.S. Case No. 139 of 2025) involving offences under the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act. The …

Anchal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, four residents of Barith village, were arrested in connection with a cyber‑fraud case (Giriyak P.S. Case No. 336 of 2025) and have been in custody since 30 July 2025. They were charged under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, including sections 318(4), 319(2), …

Rahul PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The Patna High Court considered bail applications filed by four accused persons—Mantu Kumar, Rahul Paswan, Raju Kumar and Anchal Kumar—who were arrested in connection with a Giriyak police case alleging cyber fraud and related offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Information …

AKASH KUMAR @ BUDHAversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Akash Kumar petitioned for pre‑arrest bail in a cyber‑offence case (Cyber P.S. Case No. 115 of 2025) involving alleged fraud under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act. The prosecution alleged that a raid recovered mobile devices used …

Abhishek PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Guddu Kumar was arrested in a cyber‑fraud case (PS‑79/2025) alleging violations of several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act (BNS) and the Information Technology Act. The prosecution relied on a co‑accused’s statement that Kumar was an associate in using other persons' bank accounts …

Sintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Sintu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case (Ranitalab P.S. Case No. 44 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act and Section 66E of the Information Technology Act for allegedly creating and circulating viral objectionable photographs and video of a …

Pramod PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Pramod Paswan, was implicated in a case (Shahpur P.S. Case No. 55 of 2025) involving alleged fraud and cyber offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and arguing that the allegations …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, was arrested in a cyber‑crime case (Patna Cyber P.S. Case No. 1582 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 318(2), 318(4), 319(2), 336(2), 336(3), 340(2) & 111(2)(b) of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 66(C) and 66(D) of the Information Technology Act, for allegedly …

Munfed KhanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Munfed Khan applied for bail in a cyber‑crime case (Chhapra Cyber P.S. Case No. 245 of 2024) alleging offences under Sections 318(4), 328, 336(3) of the B.N.S. and Sections 66(C) and 66(D) of the Information Technology Act. The prosecution alleged that a fake Facebook ID of the S.P., Saran was …

Guddu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Guddu Kumar was arrested in a cyber‑fraud case (PS‑79/2025) alleging that he, as an associate of Abhishek Pandey, used other persons' bank accounts to launder proceeds of fraud. The prosecution relied on the co‑accused’s statement, while the petitioner claimed innocence, stating that only items from …

Archana Devi Chauhan @ Archana ChauhanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Archana Devi Chauhan was arrested in connection with a cyber‑P.S. case for allegedly withdrawing Rs 98,000 and routing it through an associate. She faced charges under Sections 303(2), 319(2), 318(4), 336(3), 338, 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 66, 66(c), 66(D) of the Information Technology …

Deepak Singh @ Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Deepak Singh applied for regular bail in a case registered under sections 77, 7, 351(3) and 352 of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and sections 66(C), 66(E), 67 and 67(A) of the I.T. Act. The prosecution alleges that Singh, without consent, made a video‑call conversation and objectionable …

Chunnu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, Chunnu Kumar and Sintu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a cyber fraud case involving fake loan advertisements. The prosecution alleged that they, along with others, participated in organized cyber fraud, with digital devices, cash and documents seized during a raid. …

Om Prakash Kumar @ Om PrakashversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Om Prakash Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S. and the Information Technology Act. The prosecution alleged that he threatened an informant and her husband and posted obscene photographs of the informant on …

Nirmala KulapattiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nirmala Kulapatti, wife of co-accused Raushan Kumar Jha, applied for anticipatory bail in a cyber‑crime case where the FIR alleged offences under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act and the Information Technology Act. The FIR named ten persons, but the only link …

Rohit Kumar @ Rahul YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case arising from a viral video showing individuals brandishing illegal firearms, for which he was implicated based on a statement by a local chowkidar. The prosecution alleged offences under Sections 25, 7, 27 of the Arms Act and Section …

AMAN RAJversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Aman Raj, was arrested in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No. 1649 of 2025 for alleged fraudulent advertisements promising PM Mudra loan approvals, under which he allegedly extracted sums ranging from Rs. 4,000 to Rs. 25,000 from victims. The prosecution charged him with offences …

Pintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Pintu Kumar was arrested in a cyber‑related case (Nawada Cyber P.S. Case No. 142 of 2025) on charges under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act. The prosecution alleged that mobile phones and a motorcycle recovered from him contained data …

Abhay Raj @ Raja RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Abhay Raj, was arrested in Nawada Cyber Police Station case No. 142 of 2025 on suspicion of multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act. The prosecution alleged that mobile phones and a motorcycle recovered from him contained data …

Sandeep Yadav @ Sandeep Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Sandeep Yadav, was charged under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, IPC and IT Act for alleged rape, robbery and related offences, based on the victim's claim that she was assaulted, filmed and threatened. The appellant contended he had a clean record, that the allegations were …

Jatin Goyal @ Yogesh Sahu @ YogeshversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners, Jatin Goyal and Shankar Mishra, were arrested in connection with a cyber‑fraud case involving alleged forgery, cheating and violations of Sections 419, 420, 379, 467, 468, 471, 120B/34 of the IPC and Section 66D of the IT Act. They sought regular bail, claiming they were merely …

Kata Srinivas RaoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Kata Srinivas Rao, was charged under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 303(2), 204 of the BNS, 2023 and Sections 66 and 66(d) of the Information Technology Act for allegedly cheating Rs. 14,33,487. He had been in custody for more than a year and offered to refund Rs. 5,00,000 to the informant …

Shankar Mishra @ Krishna Mahanti @ ShankarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners, Jatin Goyal and Shankar Mishra, were arrested in connection with a cyber‑fraud case involving alleged forgery, cheating and violations of Sections 419, 420, 379, 467, 468, 471, 120B/34 of the IPC and Section 66D of the IT Act. They sought regular bail, claiming they were merely …

ARUL SOMKUWAR AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Allowed

The petitioners, college students, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking quash of FIR No. 41 of 2026 registered for offences under Section 356 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 66E of the IT Act. The …

Irshad @ Irshad AhmadversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Irshad Ahmad, was arrested in connection with a cyber‑crime case (Case No. 132 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the B.N.S. and Sections 66(C) and 66(D) of the Information Technology Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was an associate of Aashuiq …

Abhishek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (Goraul PS Case No. 436 of 2025) involving alleged kidnapping, robbery, sexual assault, blackmail, and extortion, with charges under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Sections 66A …

Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Raushan Kumar was arrested on 15 September 2025 in connection with a case involving alleged offences under Sections 303(2), 318(4), 317(5), 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 66(c) of the Information Technology Act. The prosecution alleged that two mobile phones were …

Manu Kumar @ Sarwjeet Kumar @ Sarvjeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manu Kumar applied for anticipatory bail in a cyber‑fraud case (Warisaliganj P.S. Case No. 207 of 2025) where he was implicated solely on statements of co‑accused who were arrested and material seized from them. The prosecution alleged offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, …

Md. Noman @ NaumanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Noman, was accused of creating and circulating obscene photographs and videos of an informant, demanding Rs.5 lakh, receiving Rs.2 lakh, and allegedly continuing to send obscene material after payment. He sought anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and no prior criminal record. …

DHARMENDRA RAVIDAS @ DHARO @ D.J. @ DHARMENDRA KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Dharmendra Ravidas and Mantu Ravidas, were arrested in connection with a case registered on 03-10-2024 under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Arms Act and the IT Act. Their earlier application for regular bail was rejected, with the court directing a renewal …

Sanjay Kumar @ Sanjay RavidasversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the Arms Act and the Information Technology Act, and has been in custody since 3 October 2024. An earlier application for regular bail was rejected, with the …

Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Vikash Kumar was charged with blackmail, extortion, and the unlawful dissemination of objectionable videos, invoking sections 341, 448, 504, 506, 323, 354(D) of the IPC and section 67 of the Information Technology Act. The prosecution alleged that he threatened to upload the complainant’s private …

Dharmendra Soni @ Dharmendra Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dharmendra Soni, was implicated in a case alleging offences under IPC sections 354(c), 354(a), 34 and IT Act sections 67(A), 67(B) for allegedly supplying an obscene video to an informant. The informant claimed she received indecent material from an unknown number and suspected the …

Md. Jarar AlamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dr. Md. Jarar Alam, a medical practitioner, was accused in Mahila P.S. Case No. 35 of 2023 of raping a woman after rendering her unconscious with an injection, videographing the act, and blackmailing her for Rs. 2 lakh. The FIR, filed on 4 September 2023, alleged offences under IPC …

Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Vikash Kumar, was charged with rape, attempted rape, criminal intimidation, offences under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act and the Information Technology Act for allegedly deceiving a minor into a sexual relationship, recording a video, demanding money, and …

SHANOOversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 by Shanoo, who was arrested in connection with a cyber‑fraud case involving alleged creation of a fraudulent UPI account and misappropriation of Rs.5,07,029. The FIR alleged that Shanoo, along with a co‑accused, …

Ram Lal DasversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellant, Ram Lal Das, appealed against the order of the Exclusive Special Judge that denied his bail application in a case alleging rape of a mentally challenged girl, video recording of the act, and its circulation. The charges were framed under Sections 126(2), 64(2), 70(1) of the Bharatiya …

Devendra Sah @ Devendra DasversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellant, Devendra Sah, appealed against the order of the Exclusive Special Judge refusing bail in a case alleging his involvement in the rape of the informant's mentally challenged daughter, recording and circulating a video of the act, and offences under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) …

Rakesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Rakesh Kumar petitioned the Patna High Court for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR alleging multiple offences under the B.N.S., 2023 and the Information Technology Act. The allegations include establishing a physical relationship with the informant under undue pressure, taking …

Vishal Kumar Yadav @ Vishal Kumar @ RockyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vishal Kumar Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving a viral video showing firearms, alleged under Section 351(2) of the Bihar Narcotic (B.N.S.) Act, Sections 25(9), 7 and 27 of the Arms Act and Section 66D of the IT Act. The prosecution’s case was based on an …

NAWAZ @ BAPU FARUKHBHAI BUKHARIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat considered an application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, filed by Nawaz @ Bapu Farukhkhan Bukhari seeking regular bail after a charge‑sheet was filed for offences under the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act. …

Md. Salim @ Mohammad Salim Sheikh @ Mohammad salim sekhversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Salim, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, the POCSO Act and the IT Act based on allegations by informant Rehana that she was repeatedly raped, threatened with the release of intimate videos, and extorted for Rs. …

Prem Kishore SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Prem Kishore Singh sought relief from arrest in a cyber‑fraud case where he was alleged to have been involved in misappropriating Rs 26,57,348 under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 34 and IT Act sections 65, 66C, 66D. The informant, a LIC branch manager, filed the FIR on 24‑10‑2024, but the …

Md. Dilsad @ Md. DilshadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Md. Dilsad, applied for regular bail under section 64 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and section 67 of the Information & Technology Act in connection with a rape case (FIR No. 272 of 2025). The prosecution alleged that the petitioner raped a woman, recorded the act, and …

Manoj Kumar @ MantuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manoj Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging criminal intimidation, forgery, and the creation and distribution of obscene material under Sections 506, 469 of the IPC and Sections 67, 67A of the IT Act. The complainant claimed the accused threatened his family, blackmailed his …

Ramesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ramesh Kumar was arrested in connection with a cyber‑related case (Sitamarhi Cyber P.S. Case No. 27 of 2023) alleging offences under IPC sections 406, 420, 379 and IT Act section 66(D). He contended that the money withdrawn from the informant's account was done by unknown persons and that the …

Bal Kishun KewatversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Bal Kishun Kewat applied for bail in a case (Atri PS No.136 of 2025) involving alleged offences under the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, the Information Technology Act and the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that Kewat, as the father of Shalu Kumar, had called on a mobile number to dissuade …

Kalawati KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, a Police Sub‑Inspector, was punished with a six‑month withholding of increment for allegedly failing to complete a rape‑related investigation within the prescribed 60‑day period. She challenged the punishment by filing a writ petition seeking quashing of the disciplinary order dated …

Shubham Singh @ ChunnuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Shubham Singh, was named in an FIR for allegedly capturing and uploading obscene photographs during a video call with a 22‑year‑old informant, in violation of Sections 76, 77, 78, 356(2) and 3 of the Bihar Penal Code and Sections 67 and 67‑A of the Information Technology Act. The …

Pappu @ Majid @ Mohammad MajidversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Pappu @ Majid @ Mohammad Majid, sought anticipatory bail after police, acting on secret information, raided a hotel and apprehended members of an online fraud gang who named him as an associate. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was involved in offences punishable under IPC …

Ganesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ganesh Kumar was arrested in connection with an online loan fraud case (Warisaliganj P.S. Case No. 207 of 2025) and charged under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act. The prosecution alleged that a police raid uncovered mobile phones, SIM cards …

Praduman Kumar SawversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellant, Praduman Kumar Saw, was charged under several IPC provisions, the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the Information Technology Act for allegedly sending obscene photographs of the informant to her husband and threatening her. He applied for …

Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Raushan Kumar was arrested on 22 July 2025 in connection with a Mahila Police Station case alleging offences under Sections 376, 354(C)/34 of the IPC and Sections 66(C) and 67(D) of the Information Technology Act, involving alleged sexual relations with a married woman and the taking of private …

Amit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Amit Kumar was arrested during a police raid on a house in Patna after a Facebook advertisement offering loans through SBI YONO was traced to a suspicious mobile number. He was charged under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act and Sections 66(C) and 66(D) of the Information …

Rohit Kumar Mehta @ Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Rohit Kumar Mehta, was arrested on 11 August 2025 in connection with a Mahila Police Station case involving alleged sexual exploitation of a minor, including the creation of an obscene video and threats to disseminate it. He sought regular bail, claiming a clean antecedent and that …

Pintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Pintu Kumar petitioned for bail in a cyber‑related case (Cyber P.S. Case No. 134 of 2025) involving offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act. The prosecution alleged that during a raid on co‑accused Kanhai Kumar’s house, several mobile phones and identity …

Lavkush KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Lavkush Kumar was arrested on 11 October 2025 in connection with a case alleging that he, along with co‑accused, collected mobile numbers and lured the public into taking online loans in the name of Dhani Finance, violating several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and the Information …

Ajit Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ajit Kumar Yadav, was arrested in connection with a case alleging cruelty, dowry demand, and the illegal dissemination of a private video, invoking sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, Dowry Prohibition Act and the Information Technology Act. The petitioner contended that the …

Mayank MohanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Mayank Mohan, was named in an FIR for alleged fraud involving the operation of an informant's bank accounts and offences under several IPC and IT Act provisions. He sought bail, contending that the FIR was lodged after a year, the bank had taken no action, and the informant suffered …

RAMANAND SAH @ RAMANAND KUMAR SHAHversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

BAIL GRANTED

Ramanand Shah was arrested for allegedly secretly recording a video of a minor taking a bath and subsequently disseminating the footage. He faced charges under Sections 74, 77, and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, Sections 10, 12 and 15 of the POCSO Act, and Section 67 of the …

Sanjivan Paswan @ Sanjivan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sanjivan Paswan, was charged with rape and related offences under Sections 376(D), 341, 342, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 67(A) of the Information Technology Act. The FIR alleged that he, along with co‑accused, lured the victim with a false promise of marriage, drugged …

Akash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Akash Kumar, a 21‑year‑old student, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a cyber‑crime case (Case No. 254 of 2023) under Sections 67(A) and 67(B) of the Information Technology Act for alleged child pornography posted on Facebook from a mobile number registered in his …

Gopal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Gopal Kumar was named in an FIR for alleged cyber fraud under several provisions of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act. The prosecution’s case rested mainly on a disclosure by a co‑accused, with no electronic trail or other incriminating material found against the …

Raja KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Raja Kumar, was arrested on 1 March 2025 for alleged cyber fraud and charged under Sections 318(4) and 319(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 66(C) and 66(D) of the Information Technology Act. The Cyber Police recovered several mobile phones, a laptop and written …

Naresh Ram Turi @ Naresh RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Naresh Ram Turi, was arrested in connection with a case registered at Gaya Mahila Police Station (Case No. 41 of 2024) for offences under Section 64(i) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 67 and 67(A) of the Information Technology Act. He applied for bail, claiming he …

Ram Naresh Jha @ Bikau JhaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ram Naresh Jha, sought regular bail in a case (PS 381/2024) involving alleged offences under the B.N.S., the POCSO Act and the Information Technology Act, where he was accused of being the father of the main accused who allegedly harassed a minor. The prosecution contended that the …

NikhilversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nikhil, applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving multiple offences under the B.N.S., the Information Technology Act and the Arms Act, alleging that his name appears in a co-accused's confessional statement but he will cooperate with the investigation. The State opposed the …

Kapil Yadav @ Kapil Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Kapil Yadav was arrested in connection with a celebratory firing at a birthday party, alleged under Sections 25, 7 and 27 of the Arms Act and Section 66C of the Information Technology Act. A video showed a co‑accused firing, with the firearm being handed to the petitioner, but no injury occurred and …

Prakash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Prakash Kumar was arrested in connection with a cyber‑crime case (Rohtas Cyber P.S. Case No. 35 of 2025) alleging that he sent obscene messages and threatened to make them public unless money was paid, invoking sections 78, 79, 308(3), 351(2) of the B.N.S. and sections 67 and 67A of the …

Sanjay DasversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sanjay Das, was arrested in connection with a cyber case (Motihari Cyber P.S. Case No. 60 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic and Substance (BNS) Act, 2023 and Sections 67 and 67A of the Information Technology Act. He contended that the allegations …

Dharmpal Chaudhary @ Dularchand ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dharmpal Chaudhary, was named in an FIR for alleged cyber fraud under several provisions of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act. The investigation uncovered no electronic trail or incriminating material against him, and his alleged involvement stemmed …

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, was charged under multiple IPC sections including rape, extortion, assault, intimidation and common intention, as well as sections of the POCSO Act and the IT Act, for allegedly having a physical relationship with the informant's daughter, recording and distributing …

Sumit Saurabh @ Sumit SauravversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sumit Saurabh, was arrested in connection with a cyber‑fraud case (Motihari Cyber P.S. Case No. 92 of 2025) and charged with multiple offences under the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, the Information Technology Act and the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case is based on a confessional …

Md. Zahid Hussain @ Md. Zahid @ Zahid HussainversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Md. Zahid Hussain, his son Md. Sakir Hussain and wife Nahid Khatoon, sought bail after being named in an FIR relating to alleged sexual offences against a minor under the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, the POCSO Act and the IT Act. The FIR alleged that the accused brother, Md. …

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Nitish Kumar and Ayush Kumar, both in custody, applied for bail in a cyber‑fraud case (Patna Cyber P.S. Case No. 1670 of 2025) involving offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act. They contended that they were falsely implicated, that no incriminating …

Dhramveer KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Dhramveer Kumar, was arrested in a cyber‑crime case (Patna Cyber P.S. Case No. 1670 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the B.N.S. and the Information Technology Act, including cheating through online gaming apps. The prosecution claimed that a raid on Ranvijay …

Ayush KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Nitish Kumar and Ayush Kumar, both in custody, applied for bail in a cyber‑fraud case (Patna Cyber P.S. Case No. 1670 of 2025) involving offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act. They contended that they were falsely implicated, that no incriminating …

AKSHAY SADASHIV GALAVEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered two bail applications arising from the same cyber‑fraud case (Crime No.25 of 2025) involving alleged conversion of a Rs 5 lakh fraud amount into cryptocurrency. The prosecution alleged that the applicants received the money from a co‑accused and were aware it was …

Abhay Kumar @ Abhay Kumar GudduversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Abhay Kumar, a caretaker/guard of Awadh Bihari Sanskrit College in Khagaria, was named in FIR No.18 of 2025 for alleged failure to deposit Rs.15,36,000 revenue and for land encroachment by the college, invoking multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act (BNS) and the Information Technology …

Barun KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Barun Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 96 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, alleging kidnapping of a minor and creation of nude photographs that were circulated online. The petitioner …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manish Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging that he took obscene photographs of a minor, assaulted her, and attempted to abduct her, offences punishable under Section 74 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Section 67 of the Information Technology Act and Section …

Manvendra Krishna BharatversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Manvendra Krishna Bharat, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case involving multiple offences under the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 66(E) of the Information Technology Act. The FIR alleges that he eloped with an informant, subsequently …

Kanhai KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Kanhai Kumar, sought regular bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Information Technology Act. The prosecution’s case was based on a raid of the petitioner’s house, during which eight mobile phones, a passbook, identity documents and …

Roshan Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Roshan Kumar Sah, was arrested in a cyber‑crime case alleging cheating of Rs.1,45,000 by promising investment returns. He is accused under IPC sections 379, 406, 419, 420, 468 and IT Act section 66(D). The petitioner claimed the alleged investment never occurred and that the case was …

Vikram KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Vikram Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case where he was alleged to have molested a minor girl and circulated a video of the act, invoking sections of the Bihar Narcotic (BNS) Act, the POCSO Act, and the Information Technology Act. The petitioner claimed innocence and argued …

Tushar BhartiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Tushar Bharti, was arrested in connection with Pothiya police case No. 77 of 2024, which alleged offences under Sections 64, 76, 308, 3(5) of the BNS Act, 67(A) of the IT Act and later Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The FIR states that co‑accused Ritik Yadav sexually exploited …

Amit Kumar @ Amit Kumar DubeyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Amit Kumar Dubey, was accused of kidnapping the minor daughter of an informant, creating obscene videos of her, and threatening her death, with charges under Sections 137(2), 87 and 3(5) of the BNS, Sections 4 and 8 of the POCSO Act and Section 67 of the IT Act. The petitioner sought …

Avinash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Avinash Kumar was arrested in a cyber‑crime case for allegedly creating a fake website that mimics the Patna High Court, violating Sections 337 and 336(3) of the B.N.S. and Section 66 of the Information Technology Act. The FIR was lodged by the Registrar General after the fake site was discovered …

SANJIV RAJENDRA BHATTversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2015 INSC 767Dismissed

Senior IPS officer Sanjiv Rajendra Bhatt filed writ petitions under Article 32 seeking transfer of investigations into two criminal cases to the CBI or a fresh Special Investigation Team (SIT), alleging that he was present at a 2002 Gujarat meeting, that the Court‑appointed SIT leaked confidential …

TANVI SARWALversusCENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION AND . ORS.

2015 INSC 1000Case Allowed

The Supreme Court examined petitions under Article 32 challenging the All India Pre‑Medical and Pre‑Dental Entrance Test 2015, alleging that a criminal syndicate used electronic gadgets to transmit answer keys to candidates during the exam. Investigation reports identified a network involving over …