Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Information Technology Act

503 judgments · newest first · showing 201–400

Nitesh Kumar Singh @ Nitesh SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nitesh Kumar Singh, was not named in the FIR relating to a cyber fraud case involving illegal UPI withdrawals of Rs. 82,000. During investigation, a mobile used in the fraud was seized from a co-accused's shop, and the petitioner was implicated solely on the basis of a single Rs. …

Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Deepak Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a cyber‑crime case (Patna Cyber P.S. Case No. 1582 of 2025) involving alleged loan‑fraud advertisements on Facebook. The prosecution’s case rests on a complaint about a suspicious mobile number, a search that led to the arrest of two …

Azad ansari @ Azad AliversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Azad Ansari, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving offences under Sections 498(A), 385, 376, 354(C), 354(D), 34 of the IPC, Section 3 of the D.P. Act and Sections 67 and 67(A) of the IT Act. He claimed the underlying dispute was matrimonial, now resolved …

PANKAJ KUMAR SHRIVASTAVversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Pankaj Kumar Shrivastav applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in Cyber P.S. Case No. 132 of 2025, which alleges offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 316(2) and 61(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 66C and 66D of the Information Technology Act. The prosecution’s case is based on a …

Ayub AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Ayub Ansari, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a cyber‑fraud case (Motihari Cyber P.S. Case No.57 of 2025) involving offences under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and the Information Technology Act. The prosecution alleged that a police raid on …

Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Deepak Kumar was arrested in a cyber‑fraud case (Katrisarai PS Case No. 14 of 2026) and charged under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code and Sections 66(c) and 66(d) of the Information Technology Act. He applied for regular bail, claiming innocence, that only two mobile phones recovered from …

ASHWANI CHAUDHARY @ ASWANI CHOUDHARYversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ashwani Chaudhary, was accused of cheating an informant of approximately Rs. 23 lakh by promising loan facilitation and receiving payments through online modes. The offences alleged against him were under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Information Technology …

Pintu Sah @ Pintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Pintu Kumar, was named in an FIR alleging his participation in the kidnapping of a 14‑year‑old girl and related offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Information Technology Act and the POCSO Act. The informant claimed the girl was abducted twice, photographed and threatened …

Durganand MishraversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Durganand Mishra was arrested in a cyber fraud case (Bhagalpur Cyber P.S. Case No. 04 of 2026) alleging a transfer of Rs.18.70 lakh and offences under Section 318(4) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 66(c), 66(d), 111(2) of the IT Act. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that …

NAZIM ANSARIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Nazim Ansari, who was arrested in a cyber‑fraud case (Crime No.57 of 2024) involving alleged receipt of Rs.20,00,000 and charges under IPC Section 420 and IT Act Section …

ROHIT SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Rohit Singh was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No.55 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 64, 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act. The applicant contended that he is innocent, that the alleged …

TARUNversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Tarun applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 285 of 2025) involving alleged offences under the Indian Penal Code, the POCSO Act and the IT Act. The victim, PW‑1, testified during trial that she was not sexually assaulted, that no indecent photographs were posted, and that she was not …

X MINORversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, represented by counsel, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 331 of 2025, which alleged their involvement under Sections 69, 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act. No petitioner …

MAJHALE @ VEERESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Majhale @ Veeresh, sought bail in a session case involving alleged rape, blackmail, and the circulation of a pornographic video under Sections 376‑D, 34, 506 IPC, Sections 5(G)/6 POCSO Act and Section 67 of the IT Act. The prosecution alleged that the applicant seized the victim’s …

YADRAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Yadram, who was arrested in connection with a 2017 case alleging offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and IT Act section 66. The applicant, an employee of a …

JANU @ RAMAKANT SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Janu @ Ramakant Sharma, was charged with rape, criminal intimidation and offences under the POCSO and IT Acts, alleged to have possessed and helped viral a indecent video of the victim. The prosecution alleged that the applicant, along with co‑accused, raped the victim and blackmailed …

Wasim AkramversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Wasim Akram, a director of W.S. Innovatex Private Limited, applied for bail in a cyber‑fraud and money‑laundering case registered as Cyber (Bagaha) P.S. Case No. 24 of 2025. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner facilitated the transfer of approximately Rs. 5.75 crore and Rs. …

Ram Lakhan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Ram Lakhan Singh, was charged under IPC section 376DA, IT Act section 67, and POCSO Act sections 4 and 6 for allegedly raping a minor and recording a video. He applied for regular bail, claiming innocence and that he was not named in the FIR, while the State argued that the victim …

Mithilesh PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Mithilesh and Santosh Paswan, owners of a room situated on land they claim, challenged orders directing encroachment and possession of the room after illicit liquor was seized from it. The Sub‑Divisional Magistrate had ordered the Circle Officer to initiate encroachment proceedings, and …

ABHAY @ NATIRAJA CHANDAN SINGH BUNDELAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, a 20‑year‑old second‑year B.A. student, was arrested in October 2025 for alleged cyber offences under Sections 108, 351(2) and 54 of the BNSS, 2023, read with Section 66(d) of the Information Technology Act, involving threats, extortion and impersonation that led to the deceased's …

SATYAPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Satyapal Singh, who was arrested in a cyber‑fraud case (Crime No. 25 of 2025) involving alleged misappropriation of Rs 2,20,000 and cash of Rs 1,40,000. The …

SUNEEL KUMAR @ SUNIL KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Suneel Kumar, who was charged with IPC offences (420, 468, 471, 120‑B) and IT Act offences (66‑C, 66‑D) relating to alleged cyber fraud and forged GST refunds. The applicant …

MANISH PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P.

Manish Pandey applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 318(4) and 3(5) of the BNSS Act and Section 66(D) of the Information Technology Act, based on nine suspicious transactions dated 06.05.2024. The FIR was lodged nearly two years after the transactions, and …

SHIVAM PATELversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Shivam Patel, who was arrested in a cyber‑fraud case (Crime No. 72 of 2025) involving Sections 318(4), 338, 61(2) of the BNS and Section 66(d) of the IT Act. The …

VISHAL @ SHUBHNIT TRIVEDIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Vishal @ Shubhnit Trivedi was arrested in Crime No. 0010 of 2024 for alleged offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 of the IPC and Sections 66-C, 66-D of the IT Act. He has been in custody since 30‑12‑2025 and claims innocence, asserting that the only link to him is a mention in the …

NAGESHWAR MANDALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Nageshwar Mandal, who was arrested in a cyber‑fraud case involving alleged withdrawal of Rs. 8,38,402. The applicant claimed innocence, no prior criminal record, and …

NAUSHADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Naushad, who is charged under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) of the same Act and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act for an alleged cyber‑fraud involving …

TEJVEER ALIAS BHOOLAversusSTATE OF U.P.

Disposed off/Decided on merits

The applicant, Tejveer alias Bhoola, sought bail in a criminal case under Sections 64, 351(3) of the BNS and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act for alleged extortion and distribution of indecent photographs. The applicant's counsel argued that he was falsely implicated, that the FIR was …

Md. SalmanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Md. Salman, originally an informant in a cyber‑fraud case, was later implicated as an accused under IPC sections 319, 318(4) and 111 and IT Act section 66(D) based largely on the confessional statements of co‑accused Abhimanyu Kumar and Rahul Kumar. The petitioner claimed innocence, asserted no …

Laddu Kumar @ Laddu RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Laddu Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging kidnapping, rape, and related offences under Sections 366, 376, 506 and 34 of the IPC and Section 67 of the IT Act. The petitioner asserted that he has a clean record, that the allegations are false, and that he and …

Anil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Anil Kumar and Rakesh Kumar Jaiswal, were arrested in a cyber‑fraud investigation that recovered numerous mobile phones, SIM cards, laptops, ATMs, passbooks and cheque‑books from a rented house. They were charged under multiple sections of the Bihar Narcotic (B.N.S.) Act, 2023, …

Shekhar Thakur @ Shekhar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Shekhar Thakur, a staff member of a Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) agent, feared arrest in a case alleging embezzlement of Rs.26,57,348 under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 34 and IT Act sections 65, 66C, 66D. The alleged fraud involved office boys and employees of the LIC Raxaul …

Harshit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Harshit Kumar was arrested on 20 July 2025 for allegedly operating an illegal SIM box that contained 1,400 SIM cards and was used for massive call traffic and cyber fraud, violating sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act, the Telecommunication Act and the Information Technology Act. The …

Vikash Kumar Neeraj @ Vicky @ BikyversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Vikash Kumar Neeraj was arrested in connection with a cyber‑crimes case (Saran Cyber P.S. Case No. 363/2025) alleging theft of personal photographs, hacking of an e‑mail, coercion into an illicit relationship, recording obscene videos, creation of fake social‑media accounts, distribution of obscene …

Guddu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Guddu Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging illegal possession of three country-made pistols and two live cartridges, charging him under sections 25(1‑b)a and 26 of the Arms Act and section 67 of the Information Technology Act. The petitioner contended that the seized items were not …

SHUBHAM KUMAR SAHversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Shubham Kumar Sah, was charged under Sections 64, 61(2), 81, 318 and 340 of the B.N.S. and Sections 67/67(A) of the Information Technology Act for allegedly offering a drink that rendered a woman unconscious, raping her, and recording the act, as well as sending obscene videos …

Jamal @ Md Jamal @ ZamalversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Jamal, a resident of Gilhabari, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged preparation of fake Aadhar cards and related offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act. The prosecution alleged that a raid on a neighbour's house …

Suraj Ram @ Suraj Kumar @ SurajversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Suraj Ram, a B.Sc. Agriculture student, was arrested in connection with a cyber fraud case (Cyber P.S. Purnia Case No. 45 of 2025) alleging that he supplied customer IDs to co‑accused Keshav Kumar for illegal withdrawals. He faced charges under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments …

Ayush KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Ayush Kumar was arrested in connection with alleged sexual exploitation of a 12‑year‑old girl, the informant's minor daughter, through Facebook, with accusations under sections of the BNS, the Information Technology Act and the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner recorded and …

Anuraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Anuraj Kumar applied for anticipatory bail in a case (Civil Line PS No. 282 of 2023) alleging offences under IPC sections 354‑B, 506, 509, IT Act sections 66(c), 66(d) and POCSO 14(1) for posting obscene photographs of a minor via fake Instagram IDs. The petitioner contended that he is not named in …

Binod Kumar @ Vinod KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Binod Kumar, was arrested in connection with a gambling case (Madhubani Cyber P.S. Case No. 37 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 297, 111(2)(b), 111(4), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 66(c) and 66(d) of the Information Technology Act. …

Niranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Niranjan Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he and his family enticed his niece to obtain her land and possibly subject her to exploitation. The FIR listed offences under the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, the POCSO Act and the IT Act. The petitioner claimed a clean antecedent and …

Kaushal Ranjan @ Kamal SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Kaushal Ranjan, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 376, 506, 500 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act for allegedly taking and publishing intimate photographs of a woman, pressuring her for marriage, threatening her, …

Abhay Kumar @ Abhay KharwarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Abhay Kumar, was arrested in a cyber‑fraud case (Buxar Cyber P.S. Case No. 55 of 2025) involving alleged mobile gaming and online fraud, with police seizing numerous electronic devices and documents. He sought bail, claiming innocence, that only a mobile phone was found in his …

Abhishek @ Abhishek Kumar @ ChunnuversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Abhishek Kumar and Sachin Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a cyber‑crime case (Sheikhpura Cyber P.S. Case No. 07 of 2026) involving alleged offences under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act (B.N.S.) and the Information Technology Act. The …

Jitendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Jitendra Kumar was arrested in connection with a cyber fraud involving the theft of approximately Rs. 1.45 crore from a bank account. The prosecution alleged that he seized the passbook, cheque book, ATM card, SIM cards and other items, and he later confessed to the crime and identified other gang …

PRATIK @ROHIT DAYABHAI CHOVATIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

The petitioners Pratik @Rohit Dayabhai Chovatiya and another filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash FIR No.11208057240045 (2024) registered for alleged offences under Section 66(c) of the Information Technology Act. The …

Rahul Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar Singh, was arrested in connection with a cheating case where he allegedly defrauded an informant of Rs.10,000 by promising a job, and was charged under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 319(2), 336(2), 336(3) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 66D of the …

NIKHIL HASMUKHBHAI SAVALIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Nikhil M. Savaliya, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection from arrest in connection with a FIR registered for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 66(d) of the IT Act. He …

NARINDER SINGH CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Narinder Singh Chauhan, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS and Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge-sheet and summons issued against him in a cyber‑extortion case. The FIR, lodged by Glenda Roleen Fernandes, detailed a scheme involving …

Saddam HussainversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Saddam Hussain, was arrested in connection with a cyber‑crime case alleging that he and co‑accused took Rs 21.75 lakh from an informant for forging documents for overseas employment and later assaulted the informant when the money was demanded back. He faces charges under several …

Ranjeet SinghversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Petitioner Ranjeet Singh, arrested on 15 July 2025, applied for bail in connection with a case involving alleged forcible sexual intercourse with a minor, creation and viral dissemination of a video of the victim, and related offences under the B.N.S., 2023, the POCSO Act and the IT Act. The …

SACHIN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Sachin Kumar, who was arrested in connection with offences under IPC Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2) and Section 66‑D of the IT Act. The applicant claimed …

Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, three mobile SIM retailers from Vaishali district, sought bail in an Economic Offence Unit case alleging involvement in cyber fraud through SIM cards sold to a suspect. The prosecution argued that the SIMs sold by the petitioners were used to commit offences under the Bihar …

Raja RavaniversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, two students, were arrested in connection with a cyber‑fraud case where police recovered laptops, mobiles, SIM cards and bank instruments from the house of a third‑party, Yamuna Ram. The prosecution alleged their involvement, while the petitioners claimed innocence, stating that …

Sujal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, two students, were arrested in connection with a cyber‑fraud case where police recovered laptops, mobiles, SIM cards and ATM cards from the house of a third‑party, Yamuna Ram. The prosecution alleged offences under sections 319(2), 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 111(2)(b) and 3(5) of …

Guddu Kumar @ Suraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant Guddu Kumar was charged under multiple IPC sections, the IT Act and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting the informant's daughter, stealing jewellery and cash, recording the incident and threatening her. He contended that the case was fabricated due to a …

Bablu Kumar @ Bablu RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Bablu Kumar was arrested in connection with a murder case arising from an alleged assault on 14‑03‑2025, where co‑accused Pappu Rai is said to have struck the victim with an iron rod, leading to his death. The petitioner, who has a clean antecedent, sought bail, arguing that the specific assault …

Javed @ DahadiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, Javed, Jamir, and Nanhe, applied for bail in a case registered as Barauli P.S. Case No. 368 of 2025, wherein they were accused of raping the minor daughter of an informant and recording the act on video. The charges include offences under Sections 70(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., …

Santosh SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Santosh Sharma was arrested in connection with a 2020 case alleging that he forwarded obscene photographs via WhatsApp, invoking Section 294 of the IPC and Section 67(a) of the IT Act. The petitioner argued that no electronic device had been seized and no Section 65B certificate under the Indian …

Vikky Mistry @ Vicky KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Vikky Mistry applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (PS No.162 of 2024) alleging that he lured a woman via Facebook with a false promise of marriage, recorded her undressing, and circulated the video, thereby violating sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the …

Nafis Alam @ Md. Nafis AlamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Petitioner Nafis Alam sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (Gaura PS Case No. 174 of 2025) alleging that he and a co-accused committed unnatural sexual acts with a ten‑year‑old boy and recorded the act on video. The offences alleged include sections 64(1) and 351(2)(3) of the …

Collektor @ DanishversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, a resident of Minapur, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 64 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 66(D) and 66(E) of the Information Technology Act for allegedly making intimate photographs and videos viral. He has been in custody …

Sachin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sachin Kumar was arrested in September 2025 on charges under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and Section 67 of the IT Act for allegedly creating an objectionable video of a woman, extorting money, and threatening to release the video. The petitioner contended that the …

SHIVAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shivam in a case under IPC sections 64, 352, 351(2) BNS and IT Act section 67A for allegedly circulating an indecent video. The applicant claimed innocence, stating he never possessed or recorded the video and that the co‑accused Amarjeet was …

KALLUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant Kallu was arrested on 19 July 2025 in connection with a case involving alleged indecent video creation, charged under IPC sections 504, 506, 376(2)M, sections 3/4 of the POCSO Act, section 3(2)(V) of the SC/ST Act and section 67 of the IT Act. He claimed the victim had consented to the …

ELAN KUJURversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Elan Kujur, who was charged under Section 420 of the IPC and Section 66‑D of the IT Act for alleged cyber fraud involving Rs 49,999. The applicant pleaded …

RAHUL YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Rahul Yadav, who was arrested in a cyber‑fraud case involving Sections 3(5), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 66‑D of the Information Technology Act. …

Nilesh SahuversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Nilesh Sahu, was arrested in February 2024 in connection with a cyber‑related case (Case No. 20 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 419, 420, 379, 467, 468, 471, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act. He applied for regular bail for …

Raja BabuversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Raja Babu petitioned for bail in a cyber‑fraud case (Motihari Cyber P.S. Case No. 62 of 2024) involving offences under several sections of the B.N.S. and Sections 66(C) and 66(D) of the Information Technology Act. The prosecution’s case relied on the statement of a co‑accused, Nesar Ali, who …

Naresh Sahni @ Naresh ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Naresh Sahni, a 66‑year‑old father of Guddu Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Information Technology Act for alleged extortion and distribution of compromising material. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner’s son, Guddu …

Santu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Santu Kumar, a mobile shop owner, was arrested for allegedly clicking an obscene photograph of a minor girl, the informant’s daughter, and making it viral. He faced charges under multiple sections of the Bihar Narcotic and Substance Act, 2023, the Information Technology Act, and the POCSO Act. The …

Monu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, nine candidates who qualified the Bihar Public Service Commission’s teacher recruitment examination, were marked with a “star” and their results were withheld because they were named in an Economic Offence case concerning a question‑paper leak. They argued that the pendency of the …

Abhishek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, applied for regular bail in a cyber‑fraud case registered under Sections 303(2), 319(2), 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 66(c) and 66(d) of the Information Technology Act. The prosecution alleged that he cheated an informant and withdrew money …

Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Raushan Kumar, was arrested in connection with a cyber fraud case (Patna Cyber P.S. Case No. 2167 of 2025) alleging violations of multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act. He was accused of defrauding individuals via social media …

Abhishek Nandan @ Abhishek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Abhishek Nandan, was implicated in a cyber‑related case (Cyber P.S. Case No. 44 of 2024) for alleged offences under Sections 419 and 420 of the IPC and Sections 66(C) and 66(D) of the IT Act. He claimed innocence, stating that no incriminating material was recovered from him and that …

Anwarul HaqueversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Anwarul Haque was arrested in connection with a large‑scale sim‑box operation that involved the activation of hundreds of fake SIM cards and the generation of over 51,000 fraudulent calls, including international VOIP calls converted to local calls, facilitating phishing, fake refunds, and …

Vishal Kumar @ Monti @ Vishal PratapversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Vishal Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged snatching of a purse and subsequent cyber‑fraud, charged under Sections 356, 379, 420 of the IPC and Section 66(c) of the IT Act. He claimed the FIR named unknown persons and that his name only …

Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raushan Kumar, was arrested on 15 July 2025 in connection with a case registered under Sections 75, 77 and 79 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 66E, 67 and 67(A) of the Information Technology Act for allegedly taking an indecent photograph of a victim and …

Prashant KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Prashant Kumar was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 75 and 78 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Section 67(B) of the Information Technology Act and Section 8 of the POCSO Act, alleging that he obtained a minor girl's mobile number, collected obscene photographs …

Mahendra Beldar @ Mahendra BindversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Mahendra Beldar and Yogendra Kumar, were arrested on 21 September 2025 in connection with a case of alleged molestation of a minor and the viral dissemination of her video, charged under sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, the POCSO Act and the Information Technology Act. …

Ravi KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ravi Kumar was arrested in September 2025 for allegedly making a private, obscene video and photographs of a victim public, offences charged under Sections 64, 74, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 67 and 67(A) of the Information Technology Act. The petitioner …

Ranjit Kumar TiwaryversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Ranjit Kumar Tiwary, was arrested in connection with a case alleging offences under Sections 66A and 67A of the Information Technology Act and Section 12 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleges that he befriended the victim’s daughter on Facebook, obtained her mobile number, …

JHUNJHUN KUMARversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Jhunjhun Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR alleged that he was involved in extortion calls amounting to Rs. 10 lakh, invoking sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Information Technology Act. He contended that he neither owned nor controlled the mobile numbers …

Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Yadav @ Chetan YadavversusThe State Of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner was arrested in a case alleging cheating under IPC sections 419 and 420 and cyber offences under IT Act sections 66(c) and 66(d) after a complainant reported a loss of Rs.8,11,927 through a fraudulent PhonePe transaction. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating that the money was …

Shiv Shankar Kumar @ Shiv Shankar RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shiv Shankar Kumar was arrested on 4 April 2025 in connection with a cyber‑PS case involving alleged rape, creation of a nude photograph, and threats to publish it unless the victim married him. The FIR cited offences under Sections 74, 75, 76, 79, 64 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, …

MUSHRIV ALIAS AMANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Mushriv alias Aman, who was arrested in connection with a cyber‑crime case involving IPC offences (419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 506, 120B) and Section 66D of the Information …

SACHIN KUMAR SINGH ALIAS SACHIN SURYAVANSHI ALIAS SONUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Sachin Kumar Singh, sought bail for a series of offences including IPC sections on murder, kidnapping, and the IT Act, alleging that the FIR was filed after a long delay and that the allegations of fraud, blackmail and sexual exploitation were false. The prosecution contended that the …

ASHWANI KUMAR @ BABLU BHUMIHAR @ BABLUversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ashwani Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he leaked a medical entrance‑examination question paper, invoking IPC sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B and IT Act section 66C. He had been in custody since 3 December 2025 and had already obtained bail in a …

Vibhash Kumar @ Bibhash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vibhash Kumar was arrested on 27-03-2025 in connection with a murder alleged in FIR dated 26-03-2025, charged under Sections 103 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 66(B) and 66(D) of the IT Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, assaulted a man in …

KUNDAN KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Kundan Kumar was arrested in connection with a cyber fraud case (Bhojpur Cyber P.S. Case No. 52/2025) alleged under Sections 318(4) and 319(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act. He had been in custody since 6 August 2025 and claimed to have a clean antecedent. The …

Golu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Golu Kumar, applied for bail in a cyber fraud case (Gopalganj Cyber P.S. Case No. 86 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 319(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act. The prosecution alleged that he committed …

Sanni KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sanni Kumar was arrested for alleged participation in online gambling games and charged under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that no complaint of cheating existed, and pointed to the bail …

Md. Sabbir @ Sabir @ Md. SaabbirversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Sabbir, was arrested in May 2025 on charges under Section 95 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, read with Sections 67, 67(A), 67(B) of the Information Technology Act and Sections 15(1) and 15(2) of the POCSO Act. He had been in judicial custody since 5 May 2025 and his earlier …

Dashrat BaghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Dashrat Bagh and Gaurav Tandi, applied for regular bail in a case involving alleged cyber fraud and illegal online gaming, charged under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, the Information Technology Act, and the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Rahul Kumar and Mumtaz Alam, were arrested in a cyber‑fraud investigation involving mobile gaming and alleged financial offences. The prosecution alleged that a raid on a rented house yielded numerous phones, laptops, SIM cards, ATMs, passbooks and that 18 persons, including the …

Sudhanshu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Sudhanshu Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a Nawada cyber‑fraud case (Case No. 110 of 2025) involving offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act. The prosecution alleged that a raid on his father’s house recovered electronic …

Kanchan Kumar Yadav @ Kanchan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Kanchan Kumar Yadav, was charged with offences under Sections 341, 323, 354, 354A, 354B, 506 of the IPC and Sections 66E, 67 of the IT Act for allegedly intercepting a woman, forcibly disrobing her, assaulting her with a pistol butt, taking nude photographs and threatening her. An …

SACHINversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sachin, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, as well as Sections 66C and 66D of the Information Technology Act, in connection with Crime No. 69 of 2026. He claimed innocence, stating that the FIR was lodged against an unknown person …

DEEPAK YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Deepak Yadav filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 44583, alleging that he was falsely implicated for allegedly uploading a video on Facebook. The State argued that an FIR under Section 318(4) of the BNSS and Section 66‑D of the …

Ranjit Kumar Singh @ MaharathiversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjit Kumar Singh, filed a petition in the Patna High Court seeking to quash the order dated 16‑04‑2018 of the Additional Sessions Judge, Patna, which had framed charges under Sections 341, 376, 511 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66A of the Information Technology Act. The …

Umesh SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Umesh Singh, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving alleged rape, extortion, and the transmission of obscene photographs, with charges under Sections 69 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 66(E) and 67(A) of the Information Technology …

SUJEET YADAV ALIAS DEVNATH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Sujeet Yadav was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged sexual offences against a 13‑year‑8‑month‑old girl, charged under several IPC sections, the POCSO Act, the Information Technology Act and the SC/ST Act. The victim’s statements recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of the BNSS did …

SAURABH DUBEYversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Saurabh Dubey, husband of a deceased woman, who was charged under Sections 85, 352, 108, 351(3) of the B.N.S., Section 67 of the Information Technology Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for alleged abetment of suicide. The …

Suraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Suraj Kumar, was arrested on 15 October 2025 for alleged cyber fraud involving fraudulent investment schemes on Telegram and WhatsApp, charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act. He applied for regular bail, claiming …

Rajkran Kumar @ Rajkaran Kumar @ Rajkaran YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Rajkran Kumar, was arrested following a police raid on 22 November 2025 during which two mobile phones and Rs.2000 were seized from him. He is charged under multiple sections of the Bihar Penal Code (sections 316(2), 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 3(5) and 61(2)) and sections …

Hifazu Rahman @ Hifazu Rahman Ansari @ Hifazu RahamanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Hifazu Rahman was charged with multiple serious offences, including rape, murder, and offences under the Information Technology Act, based on allegations that he intoxicated a woman, had sexual relations, and created exploitative photographs and videos. The prosecution alleged that he forced the …

Kundan Kumar @ Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, was arrested during a police raid targeting alleged cyber fraudsters and charged under multiple sections of the Bihar Narcotic and Psychotropic Substances Act and the Information Technology Act. He contended that only a mobile phone and Rs.9,850 were recovered from him, …

SADDAM HUSSAINversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Saddam Hussain, was arrested in connection with a cyber‑crime case alleging possession of child pornography, charged under Section 95 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Sections 67, 67(A), 67(B) of the IT Act and Sections 15(1) and 15(2) of the POCSO Act. Police intercepted a …

SANNI KUMAR @ SANNI MAHTOversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three brothers, were accused of uploading objectionable photographs of an informant's daughter on social media, violating several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 66(E) of the Information Technology Act. They sought anticipatory bail, claiming that only the third …

Md. Ziaul Mustafa AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, Md. Ziaul Mustafa Ansari and Md. Nooruddin Ansari, were accused in a cyber‑crime case (PS Case No. 1797 of 2025) for allegedly hacking an informant’s email and social‑media accounts and disseminating objectionable photographs, offenses alleged under Sections 79, 75(3), 351(2), 352, …

Ganesh Kumar MandalversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Ganesh Kumar Mandal was arrested in connection with a cyber‑fraud case (Bhagalpur Cyber P.S. Case No. 65 of 2025) alleging violations of Section 318(4) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 66(c) and 66(d) of the Information Technology Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, using a QR code, …

Raushan Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raushan Kumar Singh, was charged in a 2023 FIR under multiple IPC sections (341, 323, 305, 306, 385, 386, 504, 506, 34) and Section 67 of the IT Act for posting threatening messages and demanding a 10% ransom. He claimed innocence, stating the case was filed by an informant whose …

Golu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Golu Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 74 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and Section 66(E) of the Information Technology Act for allegedly uploading intimate photographs of a woman to social media. He contended that the photographs were taken …

Raja KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Raja Kumar, sought relief fearing arrest in a cyber‑fraud case (Rohtas Cyber P.S. Case No. 49 of 2025) filed under sections 303(2), 319(2), 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and sections 66(c), 66(d) of the Information Technology Act. The investigation linked him to the fraud …

Lalit Kumar Yadav @ Lalit Kumar @ Lalit YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Lalit Kumar Yadav petitioned for bail in a cyber‑crime case (Sup​aul Cyber P.S. Case No. 40 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 303(2), 318(4) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 66(c), 66(d) of the Information Technology Act. The prosecution alleged that a stolen mobile was used to port the SIM …

SAGAR CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 on behalf of Sagar Chauhan, who was charged with multiple offences under the BNS and the Information Technology Act for allegedly facilitating the fraudulent transfer of Rs. 74,90,866 into accounts he signed as …

Gopal RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Gopal Ray applied for bail in a cyber‑P.S. case involving alleged illegal gambling under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act. The prosecution alleged his participation in the gambling scheme, while the petitioner claimed false implication, absence …

Dhiraj Kumar Ojha @ Dheeraj OjhaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dhiraj Kumar Ojha, was in custody since May 4, 2025 for alleged offences under Section 64 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 66, 67 and 66E of the IT Act, involving a claim that he forced a married woman into sexual relations by threatening to post obscene photos …

NEERAJ MANDIYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 by Neeraj Mandiya, who was charged with offences under Sections 316(4), 118(4), 336(3), 340(2), 338 of the BNS and Section 66‑D of the Information Technology Act for alleged participation in a large financial …

SHARIF MOHAMMED BAPU THOTTYLIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Sharif Mohammed Bapu Thottyli applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 75, 78, 79 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act for alleged sexual harassment, stalking and outraging modesty of a female athlete. The prosecution alleged that …

KISHANBHAI @ AJAYBHAI S/O HASMUKHBHAI DABHIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Kishanbhai, a 21‑year‑old, was charged under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the Information Technology Act and IPC 103(1) for a fatal incident that allegedly occurred during a village function attended by about 20,000 people. He applied for regular bail under …

Badri Prasad @ Jay Kishore PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Badri Prasad, was named in an FIR for alleged rape under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and the I.T. Act. He claimed the complainant habitually files false cases and that she had previously married him, later blackmailing him to lodge the rape complaint. During …

Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, a 22‑year‑old with no prior criminal record, was arrested in connection with a cyber‑fraud case involving alleged recovery of a smartphone with a fake SIM card. He was charged under multiple sections of the B.N.S. and Section 66B of the Information Technology Act. While …

Md. Mojammil Hussain @ Mojammil HussainversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Mojammil Hussain, a 20‑year‑old, was charged under Sections 352 and 351(3) of the BNS and Section 67B of the Information Technology Act for allegedly attempting to make obscene photographs and videos of a minor girl viral and for harassing her by phone calls. He pleaded that no …

Sanjiv Sharma @ TiruwaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The Patna High Court considered the bail application of Sanjiv Sharma, who is charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act for alleged rape and murder. The petitioner argued that he was not named in the FIR and that his alleged …

Devopom BanarjeaversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Devopom Banarjea, applied for anticipatory bail in a cyber fraud case (Madhepura Cyber P.S. Case No.67 of 2024) alleging he had taken Rs.2,00,000 from the informant's account. The charges were under sections 303(2) and 318(4) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, and sections …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners, Rahul Kumar and Rohit Kumar Chaudhary, were alleged to have posted the name and photograph of an informant on Facebook and Instagram to harass her. The investigation linked them to the alleged offence through mobile number records. They sought anticipatory bail for offences under …

Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, was implicated in a cyber‑crime case (No. 1435 of 2025) alleging harassment, coercion, posting of compromising photographs, and intimidation of the informant's family under sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act. The informant …

Gautam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Gautam Kumar was arrested in connection with a cyber‑offence alleged under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 66C and 66D of the Information Technology Act. He filed a bail application which was rejected on 24‑09‑2025. Within six months he filed a second …

Chandan Kumar @ Chandan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (Goradih P.S. Case No. 248 of 2025) under Sections 25, 7 and 27 of the Arms Act and Section 66(c) of the Information Technology Act for allegedly brandishing and firing illegal firearms in a viral video. The …

Sagir AlamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sagir Alam, was arrested in January 2025 and charged under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 317(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 66(i) and 66(ii) of the Information Technology Act. He had been in custody for over a year without any witness examination and had no prior …

Abhimanyu Kumar @ LaluversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Abhimanyu Kumar, was arrested during a police raid on his village on allegations of involvement in a cyber fraud gang and has been in custody since April 19, 2025. He filed a second application for regular bail in connection with charges under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya …

Sanni Kumar @ Sunny KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sanni Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 25, 7, 27 of the Arms Act and Section 66(c) of the I.T. Act, based on a viral video showing illegal firearms. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with co‑accused, brandished and …

Santosh Kumar @ Santosh kr RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Santosh Kumar was charged under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 66, 66(B) and 66(D) of the Information Technology Act for alleged cyber fraud. He had earlier applied for bail, which was rejected on 14 March 2024. In a second bail application, the …

Neeraj Kumar @ Niraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Neeraj Kumar was arrested following a cyber‑raid that uncovered a laptop, mobile phones, ATM cards and other items, and he was charged under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act (BNS) and the Information Technology Act. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, …

Kaushlendra Pd. SinhaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Pankaj Kumar and Kaushlendra Prasad Sinha, were arrested following a police raid that seized mobile phones, SIM cards and a vehicle in connection with Nawada Cyber Police Station Case No. 165 of 2025, which alleged offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 …

Pankaj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Pankaj Kumar and Kaushlendra Prasad Sinha, were arrested following a police raid on a vehicle where several mobile phones and SIM cards were seized. They were charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act for alleged cyber …

SUNIL RALIYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sunil Raliya under Sections 318(4) and 61(2) of the BNS Act and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act, relating to a cyber‑fraud case. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR and that the only link to him was a co‑accused’s …

Azhar AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Azhar Ansari was arrested in connection with a cyber‑fraud case where an informant alleged that he obtained an OTP via a WhatsApp call and withdrew Rs 49,995 from her SBI account. The petitioner, in custody since 14‑Nov‑2025 and having one prior criminal antecedent, claimed no incriminating evidence …

Raj Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Raj Kumar Singh was arrested in connection with a cyber‑fraud case involving false advertisements on Facebook and Instagram to obtain PM Mudra loans, alleged to have defrauded victims of Rs.4,000‑25,000. He was charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (318(2), 318(4), …

Sajjid RajaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Sajjid Raja, was accused in a criminal case for alleged rape of an informant's daughter, creation and viral dissemination of a video of the act, and extortion of Rs. 2 lakh. The victim’s statement, recorded under Section 183 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNSS), corroborated the …

Neeraj Kumar @ Niraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, Neeraj Kumar and Rakesk Kumar Thakur, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a cyber‑crime case (Saharsa P.S. Case No. 36 of 2024) involving alleged forgery of death certificates and illegal withdrawal of funds under a labour department scheme. The prosecution alleged that the …

Md. Mahmood Ansari @ Mahmood AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Md. Mahmood Ansari, applied for anticipatory bail after being named in FIR No.250 of 2025 for allegedly photographing a 14‑year‑old niece of an informant at a family marriage, editing the image and disseminating it via a fake ID, thereby invoking Sections 352 and 351(2) of the …

Vikas kumarversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioners, a group of individuals from Banka district, were charged with cyber fraud offences under Sections 336(3), 340(2), 318(3), 318(4), 111(3), 111(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 66C and 66D of the Information Technology Act. The prosecution alleged that they …

Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioners, a group of individuals from Banka district, were arrested in connection with a cyber fraud alleged to have been perpetrated through the online platform 'WIN ADDA'. During a police raid, mobile phones, ATM cards, SIM cards, a laptop and two motorcycles were seized from their …

Bharat KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bharat Kumar, was arrested along with four others during a police raid on a Scorpio vehicle, where two mobile phones were recovered from his possession. He faces multiple offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act, including sections relating …

Jitendra Shah @ Jitendra SahversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Jitendra Shah, sought bail in a case registered as Shikarpur P.S. Case No.169 of 2025, which alleged offences under multiple sections of the B.N.S., Section 8 of the POCSO Act and Section 66E of the IT Act, including blackmail, extortion, assault and the possession of obscene …

Satish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Satish Kumar was arrested following a police raid that recovered several mobile phones and SIM cards, leading to a cyber‑crime FIR charging him under multiple sections of the B.N.S., 2023 and the Information Technology Act. The petitioner contended that the FIR was vague, that he was falsely …

MANOJ @ ARYAN CHAUHANversusState of U.P.

Manoj @ Aryan Chauhan was arrested in connection with a case alleging impersonation of a jailer and extortion of approximately Rs.50,000, charged under several IPC sections (417, 418, 419, 420, 384, 467, 468, 411) and Section 66-D of the IT Act. The accused contended that he was falsely implicated, …

MYCALE DENO ADEXversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Mycale Deno Adex, was arrested in connection with alleged fraud offences under IPC sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and IT Act section 66-D. He filed a second bail application after a first one was rejected, contending that he was not named in the FIR, that the FIR was lodged with an …

GAFFAR KHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Gaffar Khan in a criminal case (Crime No.09 of 2025) involving alleged cyber‑extortion under Sections 308(3), 351(4), 318(4), 319(2) of the IPC and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, …

AMAN AGARWALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered bail applications filed by Aman Agarwal, Aftab Alam and Jagjeet Singh, who were charged with cyber fraud under various sections of the Information Technology Act and the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha (BNS) Act. The applicants argued that the police search and seizure …

Aman KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Aman Kumar applied for bail in a cyber‑fraud case (Motihari Cyber P.S. Case No. 157 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the B.N.S. and Sections 66(C) and 66(D) of the Information Technology Act. The prosecution contended that the petitioner, together with co‑accused, opened multiple …

Munna KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The Patna High Court considered a bail application filed by Munna Kumar, who was arrested in connection with a POCSO case involving alleged sexual relations with an 18‑year‑old girl under the pretext of marriage and the viral dissemination of objectionable photographs. The FIR listed serious …

Ranjan kumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Ranjan Kumar and Rajiv Ranjan (Fantus), were arrested during a cyber‑fraud raid in Panchi village and charged under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act. They contended that they were falsely implicated, that no incriminating …

Kunal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Kunal Kumar, was arrested during a cyber‑crime raid on 2‑3 August 2025 and a mobile phone was recovered from him. He faces charges under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 66(C) and 66(D) of the Information Technology Act. The petitioner’s counsel …

Prince KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Prince Kumar, was accused of raping a minor girl, recording the act, and threatening to disseminate the video, leading to the victim's suicide. The allegations arise under Sections 64, 108, 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Sections 4 and 17 of the POCSO Act, and Sections 67 and …

Rakesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, Rakesh Kumar and Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging they, along with others, recorded an obscene video of a 16‑year‑old girl and blackmailed her. The prosecution charged them under Sections 75, 77, 78, 79, 351(3) and 351(4) of the Bihar Narcotic …

Ramesh Kumar JaiswalversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, named Ramesh Kumar Jaiswal, Hemant Kumar Nishad, Aman Kumar Jaiswal and Ajit Kumar Jaiswal, were arrested in a cyber‑fraud raid conducted by Buxar Cyber Police Station in connection with case No. 55 of 2025. The FIR alleged that the accused were involved in mobile gaming and cyber …

Aman Kumar @ Aman Kumar JaiswalversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, named Ramesh Kumar Jaiswal, Hemant Kumar Nishad, Aman Kumar Jaiswal and Ajit Kumar Jaiswal, were arrested in a cyber‑fraud raid conducted by Buxar Cyber Police Station in connection with case No. 55 of 2025. The FIR alleged that the accused were involved in mobile gaming and cyber …

Ajit Kumar JaiswalversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, named Ramesh Kumar Jaiswal, Hemant Kumar Nishad, Aman Kumar Jaiswal and Ajit Kumar Jaiswal, were arrested in a cyber‑fraud raid conducted by Buxar Cyber Police Station in connection with case No. 55 of 2025. The FIR alleged that the accused were involved in mobile gaming and cyber …

Manoj DasversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Manoj Das, a 20‑year‑old resident of Jharkhand, was arrested on suspicion of committing cyber fraud. The FIR, initially filed against an unknown person, later implicated him based on mobile tower location. During the investigation his house was raided, yielding two mobile phones (not his) and …

Mr. Sajid PrawezversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Sajid Prawez sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a cyber‑fraud and money‑laundering case involving alleged conversion of defrauded funds into USDT and other cryptocurrencies. The prosecution’s case relied primarily on confessional statements of co‑accused, which mentioned …

Krishna Kumar Singh @ Krishna KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Krishna Kumar Singh was arrested in connection with a cyber‑fraud case (Muzaffarpur Cyber P.S. Case No. 79 of 2025) alleging the receipt of Rs 8.33 crore through a bank account of an NGO and the preparation of fraudulent Aadhar cards. The prosecution’s case relied on the statements of co‑accused and …

Anand Kumar Goshwami @ Anandi Goshwami @ Anand GoshwamiversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Anand Kumar Goshwami was implicated in a theft and assault case where a bag and a mobile phone were stolen from a train and a woman was injured while pursuing the accused. The prosecution’s case relied on a confessional statement by a co-accused, Aman, who named the petitioner, though no material …

Fultun Ravidas @ Fultun Das @ Phultun RavidasversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Fultun Ravidas, was arrested in a raid on allegations of involvement in cyber fraud and charged under several provisions of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, noting that no incriminating …

Parmanand KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Parmanand Kumar filed an application fearing arrest in CR No. 1077 of 2023, which alleged that he had committed rape under Section 376 of the IPC and a cyber offence under Section 66E of the IT Act. He contended that the complaint was false, motivated by the victim being the wife of a disgruntled …

Sonu Saw @ Sonu Kumar SawversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Sonu Saw was charged with kidnapping, ransom demand and several other offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Information Technology Act. He applied for regular bail for the first time, which was denied, and subsequently made a second bail application. The petitioner argued that the trial was …

AMIT JAYANTILAL PITADIYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Amit Jayantilal Pitadiya, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 136 of 2024 under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 66D of the …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manish Kumar was named in an FIR for several offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Information Technology Act after a police raid on a cyber‑crime hub. The raid recovered mobiles but no incriminating material was found at his residence; a co‑accused merely identified him among 12 …

Tithlesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Tithlesh Yadav, was arrested in connection with a case arising from a viral video showing individuals brandishing illegal firearms, alleged to have taken place in the village of Etwa. He was charged under Sections 25, 7 and 27 of the Arms Act and Section 66(c) of the Information …

Nikhil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Nikhil Kumar, was arrested in connection with a cyber fraud case (Vaishali Cyber P.S. Case No. 10 of 2025) and charged under multiple sections of the B.N.S. and Sections 66(C) and 66(D) of the Information Technology Act. He applied for regular bail, having been in custody since 14 …

Guriya KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Guriya Kumari, sought regular bail for offences under Sections 115(2), 308(4), 351(2), 303(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 66(C) and 66(D) of the Information Technology Act. The FIR and case diary allege that she is a member of an organized gang that …

Ganshu Kumar @ Ganesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Ganshu Kumar, applied for regular bail in a cyber‑fraud case (Case No. 91 of 2024) charged under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 66(C) and 66(D) of the Information Technology Act, with additional charges under Sections 338, 336(3) and …

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case involving multiple offences under the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and the Information Technology Act, alleging cyber fraud. His earlier bail application had been rejected on 27-08-2025, with the court noting the seriousness of …

Farhad AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Farhad Ansari, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case alleging his involvement in attempted rape and the creation of obscene photographs. The FIR named him among accused persons under Sections 376, 504, 506, 509, 511, and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section …

Satyanarayan Manjhi @ BabuajiversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Satyanarayan Manjhi was arrested on charges of forceful sexual intercourse, recording a video, and related offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the POCSO Act and the IT Act. The petitioner argued that the FIR was lodged four days after the alleged incident without explanation, claiming false …

Ritik KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ritik Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged cyber fraud and related offences under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code (BNS) and the Information Technology Act. The FIR alleged that objectionable material was recovered during a raid, but no incriminating material was found on …

Raju KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Raju Kumar, a compounder at a nursing home, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving alleged rape, criminal conspiracy, intimidation, and the publication of obscene material under IPC sections 376, 120B, 506, 34 and IT Act section 67. He contended that he was not …

Husne Ali SaifiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Husne Ali Saifi, was named in an FIR for alleged hacking of the RCMS portal to obtain ration cards, facing charges under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act. He contended that he operates a legitimate Customer Service Centre and that …

Rajendra PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Rajendra Prasad was arrested in connection with offences alleged under Sections 77, 79, 351(2), 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Section 8 of the POCSO Act and Sections 66E and 67 of the Information Technology Act. The prosecution alleged that he engaged in obscene conversations …

Kanhaiya Kumar @ Kanhaiya MandalversusThe State Of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Kanhaiya Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case alleging rape, blackmail, extortion and theft under Sections 64, 303(2), 352, 351(2)(3) of the Bihar Penal Code and Section 66E of the IT Act. The prosecution alleges that the petitioner raped the informant when she was alone, …

Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rohit Kumar petitioned for bail after being implicated in a cyber‑crime case (Warisaliganj P.S. Case No. 297 of 2025) involving offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Information Technology Act. The FIR was based on a raid and the petitioner’s name appeared only in confessional …

Md. Rizvi @ Raja @ Md. RijviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Rizvi, was arrested in connection with a rally where objectionable remarks were allegedly made against the Prime Minister and his mother, leading to charges under multiple sections of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 67 of the IT Act. The petitioner contended that he was falsely …

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Nitish Kumar and his father Mantush Raut, were named in an FIR for alleged cyber fraud under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act. The FIR was based largely on statements of co‑accused who identified them, and a motorcycle registered in the father's …

Shahil Kumar @ SunnyversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Shahil Kumar, who operated a call centre and allegedly defrauded victims by persuading them to install the AnyDesk application and siphoning funds, was charged under IPC sections 419, 420, 468, 120B and IT Act sections 66(c) and 66(d). He had previously applied for regular bail, which was denied by …

Md. SidhikiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Sidhiki, was implicated in a train robbery that resulted in the death of a passenger, Kajal Kumari, and charged under Sections 61(2), 112, 307, 305(a), 313 of the B.N.S and Section 66 of the Information Technology Act. The prosecution’s case relied solely on a confessional …

Jagdish RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Jagdish Ram and Chinta Devi, and Dinesh Kumar, Ranju Devi and Nilu Kumari, are the parents of co-accused individuals in a rape and video‑sharing case registered as Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 202 of 2025. The FIR alleges that the co‑accused committed rape, married the victim, and …

Fantesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Fantesh Kumar was named in an FIR for alleged cyber fraud and related offences under the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita and the Information Technology Act. The petitioner argued that his name was recorded only based on statements of co‑accused and that no incriminating material was recovered from …

Dinesh Kumar @ Dinesh RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, parents of a co-accused in a rape and video‑sharing case, sought bail after being implicated as supporters of the alleged offender. The FIR alleged offences under Sections 64, 123, 318(2), 351(2), 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita and Sections 67 and 67(A) of the Information …

Deepak Kumar@ Dipu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a cyber‑crime case (PS No. 81 of 2024) involving offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act. The prosecution alleged that a police raid recovered mobile phones and data, leading to …

Gauri Kumar @ Gauri ShankarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Gauri Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he was implicated in a cyber fraud case (Warisaliganj P.S. Case No. 220 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 34 of the IPC and Sections 66(D) and 66(B) of the Information Technology Act. The …

Satish PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Satish Paswan sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in connection with a police case involving multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act. The prosecution alleged that a raid, based on secret information, uncovered …

Neeraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Neeraj Kumar, was charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act for alleged gang‑related extortion of Rs. 2,59,260 from an informant. He has been in custody since 17‑12‑2024 and has five prior criminal antecedents. The …

Sourav KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sourav Kumar was arrested in a cyber‑fraud case (Lakhisarai Cyber P.S. Case No.35 of 2025) and has been in custody since 24‑08‑2025. He faced charges under several provisions of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 66‑C and 66‑D of the Information Technology Act. The petitioner argued that …

Munna KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Munna Kumar was named as an accused in a cyber‑fraud case involving multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Information Technology Act. He contended that he was implicated solely on the basis of a co‑accused’s confessional statement and that no material evidence linked him to the …

Jyotish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Jyotish Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged cyber‑related offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act, based on information obtained from co‑accused persons during a raid. No incriminating material was recovered from the petitioner’s …