SECUNDERABAD CANTONMENT BOARD, ANDHRA CIRCLE,-SECUNDERABAD REP. BY EXECUTIVE OFFICERversusMOHAMMED MOHIUDDIN AND ORS.
2003 INSC 68328 November 2003Disposed off
The respondents applied to the Secunderabad Cantonment Board for sanction of a layout plan on land they claimed to own. The Board initially returned the plan for lack of an exemption certificate under the Urban Land (Ceiling) Act, but the High Court held that such a certificate was not required. The plan was later retu…
THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANOTHERversusULTRATECH CEMENT LTD
2022 INSC 87126 August 2022Dismissed
The State of Rajasthan sought to overturn a Rajasthan High Court order directing it to allot a parcel of land, classified as a ‘Johad’, to Ultratech Cement Ltd. for a cement plant. The High Court had relied on two spot‑inspection reports of the Tehsildar, which found no natural water body or catch‑ment on the land, and…
SHIROMANI GURUDWARA PRABANDHAK COMMITTEEversusMAHANT PREM DASS
2009 INSC 24724 February 2009Dismissed
The SGPC applied under Section 7 of the Sikh Gurdwaras Act, 1925 to have the institution known as Gurdwara Sahib Gurdwara Bhagat Bhagwan declared a Sikh gurdwara. The Sikh Gurdwaras Tribunal initially held it to be a Sikh gurdwara, but the Punjab & Haryana High Court reversed that decision, finding the institution to b…
STATE OF U.P. & ORS.versusM/S. SWADESHI POLYTEX LTD. & ORS.
2008 INSC 73216 May 2008Dismissed
Swadeshi Polytex Ltd., a sick company unable to pay employee wages, was subjected to attachment and auction of its property under the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950. The company challenged the sale, arguing that the sale proclamation and auction notice were not served on the actual default…
SURENDRA PAL SINGHversusTHE BOARD OF REVENUE FOR RAJASTHAN AND ORS.
1993 INSC 19813 May 1993Dismissed
The case concerned the determination of ceiling area for Raghubir Singh under the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955, where the Sub‑Divisional Officer (SDO) treated the father and his minor son Surendrapal Singh as separate units and allotted each 62 bighas 8 biswas. Raghubir Singh appealed the SDO's order, which was upheld b…
BAGIRATH SINGH AND ANR.versusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.
2005 INSC 4006 September 2005Dismissed
The case concerns the validity of a 1995 Consolidation Scheme for Shamlat Deh lands in three villages of Haryana, originally framed under the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1966 and later modified after a series of challenges. Earlier, the Deputy Commissioner had quashed the partition of these lands unde…