Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956

32 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

LIC OF INDIA AND OTHERSversusKRISHNA MURARI LAL ASTHANA AND ANOTHER ETC.

2016 INSC 29331 March 2016Disposed off

The Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) passed a Board resolution in 2001 to upgrade the basic pension and dearness relief for retirees who left service before 1 August 1997, proposing an amendment to the 1995 Employees Pension Rules (Para 3A of Appendix IV). The amendment required a rule under Section 48 of the Life Insu

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIAversusVISHWANATH VERMA AND ORS.

1994 INSC 42930 September 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The Jabalpur Municipal Corporation introduced a Family Benefit Fund Scheme whereby employees made voluntary contributions and, in return, received lump‑sum payments on retirement or on death of the employee to his family. The Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) contended that the scheme amounted to life insurance

LIC OF INDIAversusINSURE POLICY PLUS SERVICES PVT. LTD. & ORS.

2015 INSC 94629 December 2015Dismissed

The petitioners, a company dealing in the purchase and resale of life‑insurance policies, challenged LIC's circulars of 2003 and 2005 that refused to register assignments of policies to firms engaged in trading such policies. They argued that Section 38 of the Insurance Act, 1938 makes policies transferable and assigna

A.V. NACHANE & ANOTHERversusUNION OF INDIA & ANOTHER

1981 INSC 21128 December 1981Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of the Life Insurance Corporation (Amendment) Act 1981, the accompanying Ordinance and the Bonus and Dearness Allowance Rules, which sought to retrospectively nullify the 1974 settlements granting cash bonuses to Class III and IV employees of the Life Insurance Cor

DELHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY UNDERTAKINGversusBASANTI DEVI AND ANR.

1999 INSC 44428 September 1999Disposed off

The Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) offered a Salary Savings Scheme under which Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking (DESU) deducted insurance premiums from its employees' salaries and remitted them to LIC. DESU failed to remit premiums for two months, after which an employee died and his widow claimed the policy benefit

CHAIRMAN, LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION AND ORS.versusRAJIV KUMAR BHASKER

2005 INSC 32028 July 2005Disposed off

The Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) had introduced a Salary Savings Scheme under which employers were required to deduct insurance premiums from employees' salaries and remit them to LIC. When an employer failed to make the deductions, the employee’s policy lapsed and the claimant sought the assured sum after the empl

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIAversusMRS. ASHA RAMCHANDRA AMBEDKAR AND ANR.

1994 INSC 9328 February 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The widowed wife of a deceased LIC employee and her son applied for employment on compassionate grounds after the employee's death. The corporation rejected the wife's claim due to her exceeding the age limit and rejected the son's claim citing a circular that barred compassionate appointments when any family member wa

RANBIR SINGHversusSK ROY, CHAIRMAN, LIFE INSURANCE CORP. OF INDIA & ANR.

2022 INSC 48427 April 2022Disposed off

The case concerned claims by thousands of Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) workers who had been employed as temporary, badli or part‑time staff between 20 May 1985 and 4 March 1991, seeking regularisation (absorption) under the Srivastav Award and earlier Tulpule and Jamdar Awards. The Supreme Court examined w

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ANR.versusSHRI RAG HA VENDRA SESHAGIRI RAO KULKARNI

1997 INSC 66623 September 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, appointed as a Development Officer on probation by Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), was terminated on 22 May 1986 under Regulation 14(4) of the LIC Staff Regulations, which allows discharge without notice or cause during probation. He challenged the termination before the Karnataka High Court,

LIFE INSURANCE CORPN. OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC.versusPROF. MANUBHAI D. SHAH ETC. ETC.

1992 INSC 18122 July 1992Dismissed

The petitioners, Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) and Doordarshan, appealed against High Court orders directing LIC to publish a rejoinder to a criticism of its premium policy in its magazine and directing Doordarshan to telecast a documentary on the Bhopal gas disaster. The issues were whether a State‑owned c

RAVI AGRAWALversusUNION OF INDIA & ANOTHER

2024 INSC 64820 August 2024Disposed off

Ravi Agrawal filed a writ petition seeking retrospective application of the Finance Act, 2022 amendment to section 80DD of the Income Tax Act, which allows a subscriber to discontinue payments to a Jeevan Adhar scheme upon attaining the age of 60 and to use the accumulated benefit. He argued that the amendment should a

BANATWALA & COMPANYversusL.L.C. OF INDIA & ANR.

2011 INSC 69719 September 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Banatwala & Co., a tenant of premises owned by Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), sought fixation of standard rent and restoration of essential services under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 after the landlord raised rent and failed to repair a lift. The respondents argued that the premise

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIAversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

1996 INSC 27719 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) received a large income‑tax refund for the life‑insurance business in the assessment year 1963‑64, which it claimed should be treated as a profit and deducted under Rule 2(1)(b) of the Income‑Tax Act. The tax authorities argued that only the portion of the refund that had b

L.L.C. OF INDIA AND ANR.versusRAM PAL SINGH BISEN

2010 INSC 15116 March 2010Dismissed

The respondent, a Development Officer of LIC, was dismissed following a departmental inquiry that he alleged was conducted without a copy of the inquiry report and without a proper opportunity to be heard, violating natural justice. In the suit challenging his dismissal, the employer (appellant) did not lead any oral e

V.M. GADREversusM.G. DIWAN

1996 INSC 38915 March 1996

The petitioners, former employees of the Oriental Government Security Life Assurance Company, sought a revision of their pension and dearness allowance under the Oriental Pension Fund now managed by LIC, arguing that the existing minimum pension of Rs.375 was inadequate. LIC contended that the pension fund was a contra

LIC OF INDIAversusR. SURESH

2008 INSC 37814 March 2008Dismissed

R. Suresh, a Development Officer of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), was dismissed after a departmental enquiry found him guilty of negligence, though he was cleared of breach of trust and forgery. He raised an industrial dispute before an Industrial Tribunal under s.11A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 19

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusSMT. ASHA GOEL AND ANR.

2000 INSC 59813 December 2000Disposed off

The husband of Smt. Asha Goel obtained a life insurance policy from the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) in 1979 and died in 1980. The widow claimed the sum assured, but LIC denied payment alleging that the deceased had misrepresented his health in the proposal. The widow filed a writ petition under Article 22

ASGER IBRAHIMAMINversusLIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA

2015 INSC 76412 October 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, who had served LIC for over 23 years and resigned after turning 50, sought pension under the Life Insurance Corporation of India (Employees) Pension Rules, 1995, which were given retrospective effect. The corporation denied the claim, arguing that resignation forfeited pension rights. The Supreme Court e

BANK OF INDIAversusVIJAY TRANSPORT AND OTHERS

1987 INSC 32611 November 1987Appeal(s) allowed

The Bank of India sued Vijay Transport and its partners to recover a cash‑credit loan of Rs.18,14,817.91, claiming mortgages over several properties. The Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Agriculturists Relief Act, 1938 provides that debts of agriculturists may be "scaled down" under section 13, but section 4(e) excludes de

CHAUHARYA TRIPATHI & ORS.versusL.L.C. OF INDIA & ORS.

2015 INSC 95011 March 2015Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined appeals filed by several Development Officers of the Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) challenging a High Court order that set aside an award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal. The core issue was whether these Development Officers qualified as "workmen" under Section 2(s) of the In

THE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIAversusD. J. BAHADUR & ORS.

1980 INSC 20910 November 1980Dismissed

The Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) and its workmen entered into two 1974 settlements under the Industrial Disputes Act (ID Act) that provided a cash bonus to Class III and IV employees. After the settlements expired, LIC issued notices under s.19(2) and s.9A of the ID Act and the Central Government amended Regulation

MRS. BHUMIKABEN N. MODI & ORS.versusLIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA

2024 INSC 3958 May 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased submitted a life insurance proposal on 6 July 1996 and paid the first premium by cheque on 9 July 1996; he died accidentally on 14 July 1996. The insurer issued an Acceptance‑cum‑First Premium Receipt on 9 July, which the appellants (widow and children) relied on to claim policy benefits. The insurer argue

ANANDRAO RAMCHANDRA SALUNKEversusLIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA & ANR.

2019 INSC 3287 March 2019Dismissed

The appellant purchased a 25‑year endowment life insurance policy in 1993, paid premiums for 31 quarters, and in 2001 took a loan of Rs 15,000 against the policy before stopping premium payments. He sought the surrender value, and LIC offered Rs 2,268 after deducting the loan and interest, which the District Consumer F

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIAversusJAYA CHANDEL

2008 INSC 1527 February 2008Case Allowed

Karan Singh Chandel purchased a LIC life insurance policy on 28‑03‑1994. The annual premium due on 28‑03‑1995 was not paid and the policy lapsed after a one‑month grace period. The insured died on 01‑07‑1995. A cheque for the premium and late fee was issued on 27‑06‑1995 but was only received by LIC on 12‑07‑1995, afte

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA & ANOTHER ETC.versusS.S. SRIVASTAVA & OTHERS

1987 INSC 1495 May 1987Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the constitutional validity of Regulation 19(2) of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (Staff) Regulations, 1960, as amended in 1977, which required employees appointed on or after 1 September 1956 and belonging to Class I or II to retire at age 58, with a provision for retirement at 50 in the co

SASADHAR CHAKRAVARTY AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 12724 November 1996Dismissed

The petitioners, a retired employee of Indian Oxygen Ltd. and a pensioners’ society, challenged the scheme of the company’s non‑contributory approved superannuation fund. They argued that improvements made to the fund in 1985 should have been extended to existing pensioners and that the denial of such benefits violated

HARSHAD J. SHAH AND ANR.versusL.I.C. OF INDIA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 3694 April 1997Disposed off

The insured had taken four LIC policies and missed the third half‑yearly premium. A general agent collected a bearer cheque for the overdue premium after the grace period, encashed it and deposited the amount with LIC after the insured's death. LIC rejected the claim, stating the policies had lapsed because the premium

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(TDS) KANPUR AND ANR.versusCANARA BANK

2018 INSC 5632 July 2018Dismissed

Canara Bank paid interest on fixed deposits to the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) without deducting tax at source under Section 194A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer treated the bank as a defaulter and issued a demand notice, which the bank appealed, relying on Notification dated 2

DISTT. REGISTRAR & COLLECTOR, HYDERABAD AND ANR.versusCANARA BANK ETC.

2004 INSC 6311 November 2004Dismissed

The Andhra Pradesh amendment of Section 73 of the Indian Stamp Act gave the Collector power to inspect, seize and impound any registers, books or documents, including those in banks, without any procedural safeguards. The High Court struck down this provision as unconstitutional, and the State appealed. The Supreme Cou

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search