Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959

12 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

GANDHI GRAH NIRMAN SAHKARI SAMITI LTD. ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.

1993 INSC 12630 March 1993Dismissed

The Gandhi Grab Nirman Sahkari Samiti Ltd., together with Bhawani Singh, purchased 3,49,000 sq. yards of land in Jaipur and submitted a development plan to the Urban Improvement Trust, which was objected to and referred to the State Government. The State Government, after hearing objections, issued a notice under Secti

PRATAP & ANR.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.

1996 INSC 31927 February 1996Dismissed

The appellants' land was acquired by the State of Rajasthan under Section 52 of the Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959, and vested in the State upon publication of a notification in 1984. After this vesting, the Central Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was extended to Rajasthan and the State amended its own Act in 1987 an

NARPAT SINGH ETC. ETC.versusJAIPUR DEVELOPMENT

2002 INSC 22224 April 2002Disposed off

The appellants' land was acquired under the Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act for a public development scheme, and the Land Acquisition Officer awarded them monetary compensation together with residential plots of 1,000 or 2,000 square yards. A tripartite settlement later reduced the compensation and confirmed the plot al

URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST, BIKANERversusGORDHAN DASS (D) THROUGH LRS. & OTHERS

2023 INSC 93519 October 2023Matter referred to larger bench

The case concerns three bighas of land in Bikaner purchased by Gordhan Dass and co‑owners in 1970, which the Urban Improvement Trust later claimed to have acquired under the Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959. The Trust issued acquisition notices to the original khatedars recorded in the revenue records but not to t

UMED INDUSTRIES AND LAND DEVELOPMENT CO. AND ORS.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.

1995 INSC 4717 January 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959 was used to acquire land, and the Additional Collector fixed a market value. The claimants appealed for higher compensation, solatium and interest, while the State appealed the interest awarded. The District Court awarded compensation in 1983 and reduced interest, and the High

URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUSTversusSMT. VIDHYA DEVI AND ORS.

[2024] 12 S.C.R. 99313 December 2024Dismissed

The Urban Improvement Trust (the appellant) sought to acquire land in Nangli Kota and Moongaska villages under the Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959. The respondents challenged the acquisition, alleging procedural defects: failure to serve individual notices under s.52(2), premature possession before compensation w

THE INCOME TAX OFFICERversusURBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST

2018 INSC 97112 October 2018Leave Granted & Allowed

The Urban Improvement Trust (UIT) of Kota, created under the Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959, claimed exemption from income tax under Section 10(20) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, asserting that it qualified as a "local authority" within the meaning of clause (iii) of the explanation – i.e., a Municipal Committee.

URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST, JODHPURversusGOKUL NARAIN AND ANR.

1996 INSC 50210 April 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The Urban Improvement Trust (Jodhpur) acquired land of Gokul Narain under Section 52 of the Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959 and paid compensation. The High Court later enhanced the compensation and, applying the Central Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (as amended), awarded solatium, interest and additional amount, whi

STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.versusSWAIKA PROPERTIES & ANR.

1985 INSC 778 April 1985Appeal(s) allowed

The Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959 authorized the acquisition of land in Jaipur for a public development scheme. A notice under s.52(2) was served on the respondents at their Calcutta office, and the land was later vested in the State of Rajasthan by a notification under s.52(1). The respondents filed a writ pet

SWAIKA PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. AND ANR.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.

2008 INSC 1497 February 2008Dismissed

The appellants' land was notified for acquisition under the Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959 in 1975 and a declaration was made in 1984 directing them to surrender possession. They first approached the Calcutta High Court, which was stayed by the Supreme Court on jurisdictional grounds. Possession was taken in 198

JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusSITA RAM AND ORS.

1997 INSC 963 February 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The Jaipur Development Authority (JDA) issued a notification under Section 52 of the Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959 in 1979 and later, after the JDA Act came into force, issued a fresh notification in 1984 to continue land acquisition under the repealed Act. Several writ petitions challenged the validity of the

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search